You are on page 1of 255

‫تقرير مختصر عن نتائج قياس جودة خدمات شبكات‬

‫المحمول عن شهر ابريل ‪2020‬‬

‫إصدار ‪ 1‬يونيو ‪2020‬‬

‫‪1 / 284‬‬ ‫‪National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020‬‬
‫رمس توضيحي "انفوجراف" ملؤرشات جودة‬
٢٠٢٠ ‫خدمات احملمول يف شهر أبريل‬

2 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
‫• يف اطار حرص اجلهاز القويم لتنظمي التصالت عيل حتسني جودة خدمات التصالت املقدمة للمواطنني؛ أصدر اليوم املركز القويم ملراقبة جودة‬
‫خدمات التصالت التابع للجهاز القويم تقريره لنتاجئ قياسات شهر أبريل جلودة خدمات الصوت والانرتنت املقدمة من رشاكت التصالت العامةل‬
‫يف مرص؛ حيث مت اجراء اختبارات جودة اخلدمة خالل الشهر ملا يقرب من ‪ 24‬الف كيلو مرت من املناطق املأهوةل ابلساكن يف مجهورية مرص‬
‫العربية‪ ،‬واملقسمة اىل ما يقرب من ‪ 80‬مدينة ويح؛ حيث متت القياسات خلدمات الصوت والبياانت ابجراء مئات الآلف من املاكملات‬
‫الاختبارية ابلضافة اىل اختبارات خدمات البياانت للمحمول‪.‬‬
‫• يمت تقيمي جودة اخلدمات الصوتية وفقا للمعايري ادلولية واليت من أمهها‪:‬‬
‫‪ o‬مؤرش عدم بدء املاكملة )‪ (Call block‬وهو يعرب عن عدم قدرة العميل عىل بدء املاكملة الصوتية‪.‬‬
‫‪ o‬مؤرش انقطاع املاكملة )‪ (Call drop‬وهو يعرب عن انقطاع اخلط اثناء املاكملة الصوتية‪.‬‬
‫‪ o‬مؤرش جودة صوت املاكملة ( ‪ )Voice quality‬وهو يعرب عن متوسط مس توى جودة الصوت اثناء املاكملة الصوتية‪.‬‬
‫• فامي يمت تقيمي جودة اختبارات خدمات البياانت للمحمول وفقا ملعايري أمهها ‪:‬‬
‫‪ o‬رسعة تزنيل البياانت (‪ )Download Throughput‬ويه رسعة تزنيل احملتوى من الش بكة للعميل‪.‬‬
‫‪ o‬رسعة حتميل البياانت )‪ (Upload Throughput‬ويه رسعة حتميل احملتوى من العميل اىل الش بكة‪.‬‬
‫‪3 / 284‬‬ ‫‪National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020‬‬
‫فامي ييل اعداد املناطق (مدن وأحياء) اليت مت رصد اهنا تعاين من مشألك يف جودة اخلدمات الصوتية يف شهر ابريل ‪:‬‬

‫• لرشكة فودافون‪ :‬من أصل (‪ )80‬مدينة ويح مت اجراء اختبارات القياس علهيم مت رصد عدد (‪ )18‬مدينة ويح تعاين من تأثر يف مؤرش عدم بدء املاكملات‪ ،‬من أمهها مدينيت‬
‫والعبور ومرص اجلديدة ومدينة نرص واملرج والسالم وحدائق القبة والعباس ية وشربا واملقطم يف القاهرة‪ ،‬ومن حيث عدم أكامتل أو انقطاع املاكملات عدد (‪ )4‬مدينه ويح وأمهها‬
‫يف القاهرة املعادي‪ ،‬ومن حيث جوده صوت املاكملات عدد (‪ )6‬مدينه ويح أمهها يف القاهرة مدينيت‪.‬‬

‫• ولرشكة اوراجن‪ :‬من أصل (‪ )80‬مدينة ويح مت اجراء اختبارات القياس علهيم مت رصد عدد (‪ )23‬مدينة ويح تعاىن من تأثر يف مؤرش عدم بدء املاكملات‪ ،‬من أمهها العبور‬
‫والتجمع ومدينة نرص والعباس ية وحلوان يف القاهرة والسادس من اكتوبر والش يخ زايد والهرم ويف اجلزية‪ ،‬ويف السكندرية‪ ،‬مناطق يف غرب الاسكندرية ومرىس مطروح‪ ،‬ومن‬
‫حيث جوده صوت املاكملات عدد (‪ )11‬مدينه ويح أمهها مناطق يف رشق وغرب الاسكندرية‪.‬‬

‫• ولرشكة اتصالت‪ :‬من أصل (‪ )80‬مدينة ويح مت اجراء اختبارات القياس علهيم مت رصد عدد (‪ )17‬مدينة ويح تعاىن من تأثر يف مؤرش عدم بدء املاكملات‪ ،‬من أمهها مدينيت‬
‫والعبور وشربا والزماكل واملعادي واملقطم يف القاهرة‪ ،‬ومن حيث عدم أكامتل أو انقطاع املاكملات عدد (‪ )7‬مدينه ويح وأمهها مدينيت والعبور وحلوان يف القاهرة ومناطق يف‬
‫رشق السكندرية‪ ،‬ومن حيث جودة صوت املاكملات عدد (‪ )4‬امهها السادس من اكتوبر يف اجلزية‪.‬‬

‫• ولرشكة وى‪ :‬من أصل (‪ )80‬مدينة ويح مت اجراء اختبارات القياس علهيم مت رصد عدد (‪ )24‬مدينة ويح تعاىن من تأثر يف مؤرش عدم بدء املاكملات‪ ،‬من أمهها العبور‬
‫والرحاب ومرص اجلديدة ومدينة نرص وحدائق القبة والعباس ية واملنيل وشربا والزماكل وحلوان واملعادي واملقطم يف القاهرة‪ ،‬ويف اجلزية الش يخ زايد ويف السكندرية رشق‬
‫السكندرية‪ ،‬ومن حيث جوده صوت املاكملات عدد (‪ )5‬مدينه ويح أمهها السادس من اكتوبر يف اجلزية ‪.‬‬

‫‪4 / 284‬‬ ‫‪National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020‬‬
‫• ويتضح من التقرير التفصييل أن معايري خدمات البياانت يف احلدود املقبوةل جليع الرشاكت وفقا للرتخيص مع متزي رشاكت أوراجن واتصالت يف رسعة تزنيل‬
‫البياانت فامي عدا بعض املناطق أوقات اذلروة (وفقا للتقرير التفصييل للك منطقة)‪.‬‬

‫• ويأيت هذا التقرير يف اطار متابعة اجلهاز القويم لتنظمي التصالت جلودة اخلدمات املقدمة من مشغيل ش باكت التصالت يف السوق املرصي للمس تخدمني‬
‫ورفع وعي املس تخدمني مبؤرشات جودة هذه اخلدمات‪.‬‬

‫• وفامي ييل قامئة ابملناطق اليت مت رصد هبا حتسن أو سوء للخدمة حسب لك مشغل ومنطقة جغرافية‪:‬‬

‫‪5 / 284‬‬ ‫‪National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020‬‬
Benchmarking Report No. 10
APRIL 2020

10 10 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Executive
Summary

11
11 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
12 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Executive Summary
Due to the fact that NTRA in Egypt is concerned about maintaining the highest standards of the quality of the
network and getting the market insight about how operators are performing in the market from a QoS/QoE
perspective. NTRA along with Rohde and Schwarz carried out an extensive benchmarking survey of the Mobile
networks in Egypt with focus on the performance of the four operator’s network.

The full scope of measurements performed covers Egypt on monthly basis. Measurement is divided over
seven main regions, Cairo, Giza, Alexandria, Delta, Canal, Red Sea and Upper Egypt. Each area is consisting
of some clusters that will be measured during each month. And the results of each month will be discussed on
this presentation.

This presentation gives a summary view of April-20 measurements that took place in April 2020 for Egypt as
defined in later slides of this presentation, during this survey, a distance of ~ 24,000 KM’s were driven. All
measurements were done in Window time from 8AM to 8PM.

This presentation addressed 2nd, 3rd and 4th generation mobile networks (2G,3G,4G) for the Four licensees
Etisalat, Orange, Vodafone and WE (sorted alphabetically) in outdoors measurements. Key performance
indicators used in the survey are included in Annexes slides at the end of this presentation. For this campaign,
Mobile to Mobile voice scenario approach was followed to better represent customer experience in a
modernized manner.

13 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Quantitative Information
Voice Measurements Number of Tests
Total Number of Voice Calls 56,361

Data Measurements Number of Tests


HTTP Download 58,378
HTTP Upload 58,304
HTTP Browsing - Facebook 58,043
HTTP Browsing – Twitter 57,918
HTTP Browsing – Google 58,179
HTTP Browsing – YouTube 58,134
HTTP Browsing – Yahoo 57,955
YouTube - Video Stream 58,231
Total Ping Attempts 2,937,517

14 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Methodology
NTRA has preformed drive test that cover all governorates and major highways across the country. The
tests were in same time and condition for the four operators to ensure fair comparison.
NTRA measures the major “key performance indicators” (KPI) that directly relate to the public’s experience
through Outdoor (in-car user experience). These include block, dropped calls, voice quality, data
throughput. (all details will be found on annexes slides)
The drive test results represent a snapshot of the mobile service provider’s network in-car user experience
and using a particular type of smartphones to simulate end user. The reported level of service quality may
therefore not be exactly comparable with the consumer’s own experience;
The threshold for each KPI in license is mentioned in the legend of each graph. (and it is included in the
annexes slides) For better understand the results in reference to the threshold value:
• Every result exceeds the threshold value is considered as a violation to the license terms for Voice KPI’s.
• Every result exceeds the threshold value is considered as a violation to the license terms for Data KPI’s except for
Download Throughput and Upload throughput.
• Download Throughput and Upload throughput violation counted when the result is lower than the threshold value.
• We Denotes the violations where penalties are applied as dashed Dark RED Line
• We Denotes the violations where penalties are not applied as Solid Black Line

15 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Licensed-KPI’s Violation Percentage over Egypt (31 zones * 8 KPIs in license = 248 possible violations)

6%
4%

96%

94%

Violated KPI's - Voice Violated KPI's - Data Non-violated KPIs Violated KPI's - Voice Violated KPI's - Data Non-violated KPIs

4% 0.4% 4% 1%

96% 95%

Violated KPI's - Voice Violated KPI's - Data Non-violated KPIs Violated KPI's - Voice Violated KPI's - Data Non-violated KPIs

16 16 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Licensed-KPI’s Violation Percentage over Egypt

9%
29%

7% 64%
91%

Call blocked Rate Call Dropped Rate Call blocked Rate Call Dropped Rate MOS < 2.8

8%
10%
8%
10%
7%

77%
80%

Call blocked Rate Call Dropped Rate SBR UL Call blocked Rate Call Dropped Rate SBR DL SBR UL

17 17 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Call Blocked Rate - Zones

Call Blocked Rate


40%

38%

36%

34%

32%

30%

28%

26%

24%

22%

20%

18%

16%

14%

12%

10%

8%

6%

4%

2%

0%

18 18 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Call Dropped Rate - Zones

Call Dropped Rate


5%
8.57%

4.42%

6.25%
6.60%

4% 3.57%
2.11%
2.41%

2.11% 2.17%
3.20%
4.69% 2.04%

2.14% 2.20%

2.21%
3%

2%

1%

0%

19 19 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
CSFB Failure Rate - Zones

CSFB Failure Rate


5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%

20 20 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Voice Speech Quality - Zones

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8


50%

13.56%

40%
11.48% 11.49% 12.92% 11.24% 11.68% 12.65% 11.94% 14.72% 11.43% 11.66%

10.19% 10.84% 14.62% 10.55% 10.73% 10.29% 10.38% 19.20% 12.53% 10.15% 12.04% 10.79% 16.30% 14.26% 11.91%

30%

20%

10%

0%

21 21 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones

HTTP Download Throughput [kbps]


50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

22 22 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones

HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps]


35,000

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

23 23 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

Download Session Block Ratio


60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

24 24 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

Upload Session Failure Ratio


70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

25 25 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Download Session Setup Time - Zones

Download Session Setup Time [sec]


10

26 26 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Upload Session Setup Time - Zones

Upload Session Setup Time [sec]


10

27 27 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Cairo
Region
KPIs

28
28 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
29 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Zones Definition

Cairo
Madinity

Cairo Z1
Obour
Rehab
Sherouk
Tagamoaa
Heliopolis 1

Cairo Z2
Heliopolis 2
Nasr City 1
Nasr City 2
Ain Shams

Cairo Z3
ElMarg
ElSalam
Qobba Gardens
Abbasia

Cairo Z4
AlManyal
Shobra
Shobra ElKhamia
Zamalek
Helwan 1

Cairo Z5
Helwan 2
Maadi
Mokattam

30 30 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call

Call Blocked Rate - Overall Call Blocked Rate - Zones


10%
2.14% 8%

1.26% 6%

4%
1.51%
2%
2.28%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).

Call Blocked Rate


8%

6%

4%

2%

0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

31 31 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Retainability: Call Dropped Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call

Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones
5%
0.82% 4%

0.19% 3%

2%
0.88%
1%
0.58%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Voice Call Retainability is represented by call drop rates.

Voice Call Droped Rate


12%

10%

8%

6%

4%

2%

0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

32 32 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%] 2/3/4G: Short Call

CSFB Failure Rate - Overall CSFB Failure Rate - Zones


5%
0.00% 4%

0.00% 3%

2%
0.00%
1%
0.00%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &
unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.
CSFB Failure Rate
5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

33 33 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 2/3/4G: Short Call

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones
20%
4.68%
15%
4.19%
10%
3.23%
5%
3.91%
0%
0% 10% 20% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8


20%

15%

10%

5%

0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

34 34 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Call Access Time - Overall Call Access Time - Zones


15
6.76
10
7.72
9.58 5

10.05
0
0 5 10 15 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Call Access Time represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to
the receiving terminal.

Call Access Time


15

10

0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

35 35 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones
5
0.71 4

0.84 3

2
0.84
1
0.88
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay


5

0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

36 36 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Telephony Return Delay - Overall Telephony Return Delay - Zones


5
0.72 4

0.80 3

2
0.60
1
0.62
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end

Telephony Return Delay


5

0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

37 37 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Scores

Voice Speech Quality - Overall Voice Speech Quality - Zones


5
3.40 4

3.42 3

2
3.43
1
3.40
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Voice Speech Quality


5

0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

38 38 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage

Call Technology Usage Overall Call technology Usage represents the call technology
used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the
better MOS served.
Vodafone 98% 2%

Orange 100% 0%
3G
Etisalat 99% 1% 2G

We 99% 1%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Codec Base Usage

Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR 0.06%

wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end EFR
user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)

AMR WideBand

AMR NarrowBand

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

39 39 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes

9%
20%
30%
2G Quality
43% 2G Quality
3G Quality
3G Quality
41% Mobility Issue 30%
Core Network
Other
RAN Issue
RAN Issue 20%

5%

2%

4%
45% 7%

2G Quality 2G Quality
32%
3G Quality 48% 3G Quality
Core Network Core Network
43% 10%
Mobility Issue Mobility Issue
4%
RAN Issue RAN Issue
3%

4%

40 40 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2

41 41 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2

42 42 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Failed Calls Causes

1% 7%
2G Quality 3%
21% 3G Quality
32%
3G Quality 3%
1% 4G Quality
4G Coverage
41% Core Network
13%
15% CSFB Issue
CSFB Issue
Mobility Issue
Mobility Issue
No service 25%
9% No service
8% Other
Paging Issue
1% 12% Paging Issue 7%
RAN Issue
RAN Issue 1%

15% 3G Quality
11% 3G Quality
26% 4G Quality
20% 4G Quality
13%
Core Network 10%
5% Core Network
CSFB Issue 7%
5% 9% CSFB Issue
Mobility Issue
Mobility Issue
1% No service
12% 23% No service
1% Other 15%
18% Paging Issue
9% Paging Issue
RAN Issue
RAN Issue

43 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2

44 44 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2

45 45 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
46 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type
NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST
35,000 140,000

30,000 120,000

25,000 100,000

Maximum throughput
Average throughput

20,000 80,000

15,000 60,000

10,000 40,000

5,000 20,000

- -
20 sec Continuous Download 15 sec Continuous Upload 20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload
(400 MB file) (200 MB file)

47 47 / 284 Vodafone Orange Etisalat We National


Vodafone Max
Telecom Orange Max Authority
Regulatory Etisalat Max| Benchmarking
We Max Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Download Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall 400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
20057 35,000
30,000
31071 25,000
20,000
26396 15,000
10,000
24696 5,000
0
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps]


45,000
42,500
40,000
37,500
35,000
32,500
30,000
27,500
25,000
22,500
20,000
17,500
15,000
12,500
10,000
7,500
5,000
2,500
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el ElKhamia Town
Mostkbal

48 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
30,000
10084 25,000

20,000
24266
15,000
10153 10,000

5,000
15676
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps]


36,000
34,500
33,000
31,500
30,000
28,500
27,000
25,500
24,000
22,500
21,000
19,500
18,000
16,500
15,000
13,500
12,000
10,500
9,000
7,500
6,000
4,500
3,000
1,500
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el ElKhamia Town
Mostkbal

49 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
20%
0.48%
15%
0.39%
10%
0.41%
5%
0.88%
0%
0% 5% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Download Session Blocked Ratio


20%

15%

10%

5%

0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

50 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
15%
0.45%
10%
0.42%

0.22% 5%

1.16%
0%
0% 5% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Upload Session Blocked Ratio


20%

15%

10%

5%

0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

51 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.18 8

0.10 6

4
0.20
2
0.10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Average Session Setup Time [sec]


10

0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

52 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.06 8

0.04 6

4
0.11
2
0.10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Average Session Setup Time [sec]


10

0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

53 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience
20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall
20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
35,000
19,634
30,000

29,278 25,000
20,000
26,117 15,000
10,000
23,572 5,000
0 10,000 20,000 30,000 0
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

20MB Download Throughput [kbps]


40,000

35,000

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el ElKhamia Town
Mostkbal

54 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
20,000
4,461
15,000
13,254
10,000
9,710
5,000
9,029
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps]


20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el ElKhamia Town
Mostkbal

55 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

Session Failure Ratio - Overall Session Failure Ratio - Zones


10%
0.90%

0.49%
5%
0.38%

1.63%
0%
0% 5% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Session Failure Ratio


20%

10%

0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

56 56 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time

Average Session Time - Overall Average Session Time - Zones


10
4.20 8

4.15 6

4
4.80
2
3.16
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Average Session Time


12

10

0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

57 57 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

Session Failure Ratio - Overall Session Failure Ratio - Zones


10%
0.82%

0.40%
5%
0.36%

1.33%
0%
0% 5% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Session Failure Ratio


20%

15%

10%

5%

0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

58 58 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time

Average Session Time - Overall Average Session Time - Zones


10
2.16 8

2.00 6

4
2.31
2
1.85
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Average Session Time


10

0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

59 59 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones
20%
3.54%
15%
0.57%
10%
0.55%
5%
2.66%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

YouTube Session Failure Ratio


50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

60 60 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Freezing Time [msec]

Freezing Time - Overall Freezing Time - Zones


900
133 800
700
600
36 500
400
47 300
200
49 100
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Freezing Time
2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el ElKhamia Town
Mostkbal

61 61 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Video Quality

Video Quality [VMOS] - Overall Video Quality [VMOS] - Zones


5
4.06 4

4.09 3

2
4.08
1
4.09
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Video Quality - VMOS


5

0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

62 62 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Time to 1st Picture

Time to First Picture [s] - Overall Time to First Picture [s] - Zones
5
2.14 4

1.74 3

2
1.79
1
1.70
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Time to First Picture [s]


5

0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal

63 63 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Youtube - Image Resolution
100%

80%

60%

Image
Resolution
40%

20%

0%
1088 720 480 360 240 144

64
64 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Giza
Region
KPIs

65
65 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
66 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Zones Definition

Giza
Zayed 1

Giza Z1
Zayed 2
6th of Oct 1
6th of Oct 2

Giza Z3 Giza Z2
Faisal
Haram
Embaba
Mohandseen

67 67 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call

Call Blocked Rate - Overall Call Blocked Rate - Zones


6%
0.46%
4%
1.89%

0.57% 2%

1.12%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).

Call Blocked Rate


8%

6%

4%

2%

0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

68 68 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Retainability: Call Dropped Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call

Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones
5%
0.26% 4%

0.31% 3%

2%
0.47%
1%
0.36%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Voice Call Retainability is represented by call drop rates.

Voice Call Droped Rate


5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

69 69 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%] 2/3/4G: Short Call

CSFB Failure Rate - Overall CSFB Failure Rate - Zones


5%
0.00% 4%

0.00% 3%

0.00% 2%

1%
0.00%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &
unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.
CSFB Failure Rate
5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

70 70 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 2/3/4G: Short Call

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones
10%
3.50%

3.99%
5%
4.99%

5.32%
0%
0% 5% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8


15%

10%

5%

0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

71 71 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Call Access Time - Overall Call Access Time - Zones


15
6.73
10
7.66

7.75 5

9.11
0
0 5 10 15 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Call Access represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to the
receiving terminal.

Call Access Time


15

10

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

72 72 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones
5
0.73 4

0.79 3

2
0.65
1
0.89
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay


5

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

73 73 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Telephony Return Delay - Overall Telephony Return Delay - Zones


5
0.72 4

0.85 3

2
0.66
1
0.71
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end

Telephony Return Delay


5

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

74 74 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Scores

Voice Speech Quality - Overall Voice Speech Quality - Zones


5
3.40 4

3.42 3

2
3.52
1
3.40
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Voice Speech Quality


5

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

75 75 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage

Call Technology Usage Overall Call technology Usage represents the call technology
used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the
better MOS served.
Vodafone 100% 0%

Orange 100%
3G
Etisalat 99% 2G

We 99%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Codec Base Usage

Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR
wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end
AMR WideBand
user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)

AMR NarrowBand

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

76 76 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes

20% 17% 16%

2G Quality
3G Quality 17%
20% 60% 3G Quality
Mobility Issue
Core Network
RAN Issue 50%
RAN Issue

44% 43%
56% 57%
3G Quality 3G Quality
RAN Issue RAN Issue

77 77 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2

78 78 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2

79 79 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Failed Calls Causes

22%
22% 3G Quality
11%

38% 4G Quality
3G Quality 3%
5% Core Network
CSFB Issue
45% CSFB Issue
22% Mobility Issue 5%
8% 19% Mobility Issue
RAN Issue
No service
RAN Issue

9% 9% 14% 3G Quality
27%
3G Quality 36% 4G Quality
9% 9%
CSFB Issue CSFB Issue
No service 14% Mobility Issue
46% Other 14% No service
Paging Issue Paging Issue
9% RAN Issue

4%

80 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2

81 81 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2

82 82 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
83 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type
NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST
40,000 140,000

35,000
120,000

30,000
100,000

Maximum throughput
25,000
Average throughput

80,000

20,000

60,000
15,000

40,000
10,000

20,000
5,000

- -
20 sec Continuous Download 15 sec Continuous Upload 20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload
(400 MB file) (200 MB file)

Vodafone Orange Etisalat We Vodafone Max Orange Max Etisalat Max We Max

84 84 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Download Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall 400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
45,000
20213 40,000
35,000
30,000
34403 25,000
20,000
27514 15,000
10,000
23097 5,000
0
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000 37,500 40,000 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps]


50,000
47,500
45,000
42,500
40,000
37,500
35,000
32,500
30,000
27,500
25,000
22,500
20,000
17,500
15,000
12,500
10,000
7,500
5,000
2,500
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

85 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
35,000
11650 30,000
25,000
26119 20,000
15,000
6931
10,000

13137 5,000
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps]


39,000
37,500
36,000
34,500
33,000
31,500
30,000
28,500
27,000
25,500
24,000
22,500
21,000
19,500
18,000
16,500
15,000
13,500
12,000
10,500
9,000
7,500
6,000
4,500
3,000
1,500
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

86 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
10%
0.48%

0.13%
5%
0.80%

0.32%
0%
0% 5% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Download Session Blocked Ratio


10%

5%

0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

87 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
10%
0.24%

0.04%
5%
0.50%

0.75%
0%
0% 5% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Upload Session Blocked Ratio


10%

5%

0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

88 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.24 8

0.10 6

4
0.24
2
0.13
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Average Session Setup Time [sec]


10

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

89 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time [sec]

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.05 8

0.05 6

4
0.12
2
0.13
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Average Session Setup Time [sec]


10

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

90 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall 20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
19,920 35,000
30,000
32,252 25,000
20,000
27,169 15,000
10,000
22,548 5,000
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

20MB Download Throughput [kbps]


40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

91 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
20,000
4,615
15,000
14,083
10,000
11,159
5,000
7,463
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps]


25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

92 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

Session Failure Ratio - Overall Session Failure Ratio - Zones


5%
0.34% 4%

0.04% 3%

2%
0.95%
1%
1.02%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Session Failure Ratio


6%

5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

93 93 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time

Average Session Time - Overall Average Session Time - Zones


10
4.21

4.28
5
5.13

3.31
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Average Session Time


10

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

94 94 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

Session Failure Ratio - Overall Session Failure Ratio - Zones


5%
0.29% 4%

0.13% 3%

2%
1.25%
1%
1.12%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Session Failure Ratio


6%

5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

95 95 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time

Average Session Time - Overall Average Session Time - Zones


10
1.99 8

1.88 6

4
2.30
2
1.89
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Average Session Time


10

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

96 96 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones
5%
0.39% 4%

0.18% 3%

2%
0.81%
1%
1.14%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

YouTube Session Failure Ratio


5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

97 97 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Freezing Time [msec]

Freezing Time - Overall Freezing Time - Zones


300
54.89 250

200
44.63
150
75.56 100

50
47.86
0
0 50 100 150 200 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Freezing Time
600

500

400

300

200

100

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

98 98 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Video Quality

Video Quality [VMOS] - Overall Video Quality [VMOS] - Zones


5
4.09 4

4.09 3

2
4.09
1
4.09
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Video Quality - VMOS


5

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

99 99 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Time to 1st Picture

Time to First Picture [s] - Overall Time to First Picture [s] - Zones
5
2.05 4

1.71 3

2
1.83
1
1.72
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Time to First Picture [s]


5

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

100100 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Youtube - Image Resolution
100%

80%

60%

Image
Resolution
40%

20%

0%
1088 720 480 360 240 144

101 / 284 101 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Alexandria
Region
KPIs

102
102 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
103 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Zones Definition

Alexandria
East1
East2

Alex Z1
East3
East4

East5
West 1

Alex Z3 Alex Z2
West 2

Matrouh
Northencoast

104104 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call

Call Blocked Rate - Overall Call Blocked Rate - Zones


5%
0.61% 4%

1.38% 3%

2%
0.54%
1%
1.40%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).

Call Blocked Rate


15%

10%

5%

0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

105105 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Retainability: Call Dropped Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call

Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones
5%
0.39% 4%

0.23% 3%

2%
0.46%
1%
0.39%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Voice Call Retainability is represented by call drop rates.

Voice Call Droped Rate


5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

106106 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%] 2/3/4G: Short Call

CSFB Failure Rate - Overall CSFB Failure Rate - Zones


5%
0.00% 4%

0.00% 3%

2%
0.00%
1%
0.00%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &
unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.
CSFB Failure Rate
5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

107107 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 2/3/4G: Short Call

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones
20%
4.31%

8.71%
10%
4.48%

4.77%
0%
0% 10% 20% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8


20%

10%

0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

108108 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Call Access Time - Overall Call Access Time - Zones


15
6.57
10
8.88

7.50 5

8.61
0
0 5 10 15 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Call Access Time represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to
the receiving terminal.

Call Access Time


15

10

0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

109109 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones
5
0.67 4

1.13 3

2
0.65
1
0.83
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay


5

0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

110110 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Telephony Return Delay - Overall Telephony Return Delay - Zones


5
0.67 4

1.11 3

2
0.66
1
0.73
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end

Telephony Return Delay


5

0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

111111 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Scores

Voice Speech Quality - Overall Voice Speech Quality - Zones


5
3.40 4

3.33 3

2
3.52
1
3.41
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Voice Speech Quality


5

0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

112112 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage

Call Technology Usage Overall Call technology Usage represents the call technology
used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the
better MOS served.
Vodafone 99% 1%

Orange 95% 5%
3G
Etisalat 99% 1% 2G

We 99% 1%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Codec Base Usage

Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR
wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end HR
user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)

AMR WB

AMR NB

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

113113 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes

20%
33%

3G Quality
20% 60% 2G Quality
Mobility Issue 67%
3G Quality
RAN Issue

33% 40%

60%
3G Quality 3G Quality
67%
RAN Issue RAN Issue

114114 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2

115115 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2

116116 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Failed Calls Causes

6%
13% 5%

25%
28%
3G Quality 3G Quality
4G Coverage 28% Core Network
38%
12% Mobility Issue CSFB Issue
No service Mobility Issue

12% RAN Issue RAN Issue


33%

3G Quality
11% 17% 4G Quality

17% 5%
Core Network
43%
5% CSFB Issue
57% 3G Quality
11% Mobility Issue
CSFB Issue 6%
17% 11% No service
Other
Paging Issue
RAN Issue

117 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2

118118 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2

119119 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
120 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type
NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST
35,000 220,000

200,000
30,000
180,000

25,000 160,000

140,000

Maximum throughput
Average throughput

20,000
120,000

100,000
15,000

80,000

10,000 60,000

40,000
5,000
20,000

- -
20 sec Continuous Download 15 sec Continuous Upload 20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload
(400 MB file) (200 MB file)

121121 / 284 Vodafone Orange Etisalat We National


Vodafone Max
Telecom Orange Max Authority
Regulatory Etisalat Max| Benchmarking
We Max Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Download Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall 400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
50,000
45,000
32249 40,000
35,000
29393 30,000
25,000
20,000
26826 15,000
10,000
28313 5,000
0
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps]


65,000
62,500
60,000
57,500
55,000
52,500
50,000
47,500
45,000
42,500
40,000
37,500
35,000
32,500
30,000
27,500
25,000
22,500
20,000
17,500
15,000
12,500
10,000
7,500
5,000
2,500
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

122 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
30,000
27,000
11689 24,000
21,000
22745 18,000
15,000
12,000
6266 9,000
6,000
16524 3,000
0
0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000 10,500 12,000 13,500 15,000 16,500 18,000 19,500 21,000 22,500 24,000 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps]


30,000
28,500
27,000
25,500
24,000
22,500
21,000
19,500
18,000
16,500
15,000
13,500
12,000
10,500
9,000
7,500
6,000
4,500
3,000
1,500
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

123 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
10%
0.07%

0.07%
5%
0.45%

0.16%
0%
0% 5% 10% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Download Session Blocked Ratio


15%

10%

5%

0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

124 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
10%
0.07%

0.07%
5%
0.37%

0.24%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Upload Session Blocked Ratio


15%

10%

5%

0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

125 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time
Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.16 8

0.12 6

4
0.29
2
0.11
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Average Session Setup Time [sec]


10

0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

126 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.04 8

0.06 6

4
0.12
2
0.12
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Average Session Setup Time [sec]


10

0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

127 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall 20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
29,309 35,000
30,000
27,370 25,000
20,000
26,259 15,000
10,000
26,992 5,000
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

20MB Download Throughput [kbps]


55,000

50,000

45,000

40,000

35,000

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

128 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
15,000
4,783
10,000
9,988

7,831 5,000

8,650
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps]


15,000

10,000

5,000

0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

129 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

Session Failure Ratio - Overall Session Failure Ratio - Zones


10%
0.14%

0.07%
5%
0.60%

0.33%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Session Failure Ratio


15%

10%

5%

0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

130130 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time

Average Session Time - Overall Average Session Time - Zones


10
3.73 8

3.73 6

4
5.41
2
3.43
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Average Session Time


15

10

0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

131131 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

Session Failure Ratio - Overall Session Failure Ratio - Zones


10%
0.14%

0.07%
5%
0.52%

0.24%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Session Failure Ratio


10%

5%

0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

132132 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time
Average Session Time - Overall Average Session Time - Zones
10
1.94 8

1.91 6

4
2.41
2
2.04
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Average Session Time


10

0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

133133 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones
10%
0.27%

0.07%
5%
0.60%

0.49%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

YouTube Session Failure Ratio


10%

5%

0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

134134 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Freezing Time [msec]

Freezing Time - Overall Freezing Time - Zones


100
31

16
50
19

8
0
0 50 100 150 200 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Freezing Time
200

150

100

50

0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

135135 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Video Quality

Video Quality [VMOS] - Overall Video Quality [VMOS] - Zones


5
4.09 4

4.10 3

2
4.06
1
4.08
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Video Quality - VMOS


5

0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

136136 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Time to 1st Picture

Time to First Picture [s] - Overall Time to First Picture [s] - Zones
5
1.77 4

1.79 3

2
1.82
1
1.75
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Time to First Picture [s]


5

0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

137137 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Youtube - Image Resolution
100%

80%

60%

Image
Resolution
40%

20%

0%
1088 720 480 360 240 144

138
138 / 284 138 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Delta
Region
KPIs

139
139 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
140 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Zones Definition

Delta Cities

Delta Z1
Banha
Qalyoub
Qanatir

Delta Z2
10th of ramadan

Faqous
Zagazig

Delta Z3
Damnhour

Kafr Eldawar

Delta Z4
Kafr el Zayat

Tanta - Mahalla

Delta Z5
Desouk

Kafr El sheikh

Delta Z6
Mansoura

Senbelawen

Domyat

Delta Z7
Ras El bar

Delta Z8
Menoufbagour

Shebin el Koum

141141 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call

Call Blocked Rate - Overall Call Blocked Rate - Zones


12%
1.17% 10%

8%
1.13%
6%
1.34% 4%

2%
2.40%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).

Call Blocked Rate


24%
22%
20%
18%
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

142142 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Retainability: Call Dropped Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call

Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones
5%
0.85% 4%

0.17% 3%

2%
0.51%
1%
0.47%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Voice Call Retainability is represented by call drop rates.

Voice Call Droped Rate


5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

143143 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%] 2/3/4G: Short Call

CSFB Failure Rate - Overall CSFB Failure Rate - Zones


5%
0.04% 4%

0.04% 3%

2%
0.00%
1%
0.00%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &
unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.
CSFB Failure Rate
5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

144144 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 2/3/4G: Short Call

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones
20%
5.24%

7.14%
10%
4.34%

4.92%
0%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8


20%

10%

0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

145145 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Call Access Time - Overall Call Access Time - Zones


15
6.71
10
8.18
7.95 5

8.81
0
0 5 10 15 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Call Access represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to the
receiving terminal.

Call Access Time


15

10

0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

146146 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones
5
0.61 4

0.85 3

2
0.75
1
0.79
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay


5

0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

147147 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Telephony Return Delay - Overall Telephony Return Delay - Zones


5
0.66 4

1.15 3

2
0.83
1
0.76
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end

Telephony Return Delay


5

0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

148148 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Scores

Voice Speech Quality - Overall Voice Speech Quality - Zones


5
3.40 4

3.34 3

2
3.48
1
3.39
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Voice Speech Quality


5

0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

149149 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage

Call Technology Usage Overall Call technology Usage represents the call technology
used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the
better MOS served.
Vodafone 98% 2%

Orange 99% 1%
3G
Etisalat 99% 1% 2G

We 99% 1%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Codec Base Usage

Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR 0.09%
wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end EFR 0.09%
user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)

AMR WB

AMR NB

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

150150 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes

5%
10% 2G Coverage 25%
30%
2G Quality
50% 3G Quality
3G Quality
10% 40% Mobility Issue
Core Network 25%
5% RAN Issue
Mobility Issue
RAN Issue

9% 9%

18% 3G Coverage
3G Coverage
50% 33% 3G Quality
55%
3G Quality 9%
Core Network
Core Network 9%
8% Mobility Issue
RAN Issue
RAN Issue

151151 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2

152152 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2

153153 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Failed Calls Causes

4%
4%
3G Quality
7%
4% 4G Coverage
29% 18%
3G Coverage 7% 4G Quality
3G Quality 48% CSFB Issue
11%
Mobility Issue Mobility Issue
21%
No service 11% No service
28% 4%
RAN Issue 4%
Other
Paging Issue
RAN Issue

2%

12%
12%

2G Quality
2% 5%
9% 2% 3G Quality
3G Quality
4G Quality
13% CSFB Issue 67% 11%
Core Network
66% No service
CSFB Issue
RAN Issue
Paging Issue
RAN Issue

154 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2

155155 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2

156156 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
157 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type
NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST
35,000 140,000

30,000 120,000

25,000 100,000

Maximum throughput
Average throughput

20,000 80,000

15,000 60,000

10,000 40,000

5,000 20,000

- -
20 sec Continuous Download 15 sec Continuous Upload 20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload
(400 MB file) (200 MB file)

158158 / 284 Vodafone Orange Etisalat We National


Vodafone Max
Telecom Orange Max Authority
Regulatory Etisalat Max| Benchmarking
We Max Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Download Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall 400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
22689 35,000
30,000
29176 25,000
20,000
23662 15,000
27152 10,000
5,000
0
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps]


50,000
47,500
45,000
42,500
40,000
37,500
35,000
32,500
30,000
27,500
25,000
22,500
20,000
17,500
15,000
12,500
10,000
7,500
5,000
2,500
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

159 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
25,000
12205 20,000

17143 15,000

10,000
12401
5,000
13288
0
0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000 10,500 12,000 13,500 15,000 16,500 18,000 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps]


30,000
28,500
27,000
25,500
24,000
22,500
21,000
19,500
18,000
16,500
15,000
13,500
12,000
10,500
9,000
7,500
6,000
4,500
3,000
1,500
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

160 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
15%

0.19%
10%
0.11%

0.13% 5%

0.38%
0%
0% 5% 10% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Download Session Blocked Ratio


10%

5%

0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

161 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
15%
0.23%
10%
0.07%

0.17% 5%

0.13%
0%
0% 5% 10% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Upload Session Blocked Ratio


15%

10%

5%

0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

162 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.14 8

0.15 6

4
0.16
2
0.11
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Average Session Setup Time [sec]


10

0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

163 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.06 8

0.07 6

4
0.14
2
0.13
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Average Session Setup Time [sec]


10

0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

164 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall 20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
21,876 35,000
30,000
28,182 25,000
20,000
23,838 15,000
10,000
26,886 5,000
0
0 10,000 20,000 30,000 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

20MB Download Throughput [kbps]


45,000

40,000

35,000

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

165 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
15,000
4,614
10,000
10,388

8,266 5,000

8,205
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps]


20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

166 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

Session Failure Ratio - Overall Session Failure Ratio - Zones


10%
0.19%

0.26%
5%
0.34%

0.46%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Session Failure Ratio


10%

5%

0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

167167 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time

Average Session Setup - Overall Average Session Setup - Zones


15
4.02
10
4.30

4.68 5

3.43
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Average Session Time


15

10

0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

168168 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

Session Failure Ratio - Overall Session Failure Ratio - Zones


10%
0.27%

0.11%
5%
0.26%

0.25%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Session Failure Ratio


10%

5%

0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

169169 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time

Average Session Setup - Overall Average Session Setup - Zones


10
2.36 8

2.32 6

4
2.56
2
2.22
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Average Session Time


10

0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

170170 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones
25%
0.63% 20%

0.33% 15%

10%
3.52%
5%
0.72%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

YouTube Session Failure Ratio


35%

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

171171 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Freezing Time [msec]

Freezing Time - Overall Freezing Time - Zones


1,200
70 1,000

800
81
600
142 400

200
109
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Freezing Time
2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

172172 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Video Quality

Video Quality [VMOS] - Overall Video Quality [VMOS] - Zones


5
4.07 4

4.08 3

2
4.06
1
4.06
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Video Quality - VMOS


5

0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

173173 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Time to 1st Picture

Time to First Picture [s] - Overall Time to First Picture [s] - Zones
5
1.96 4

1.88 3

2
2.10
1
1.91
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Time to First Picture [s]


5

0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum

174174 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Youtube - Image Resolution
100%

80%

60%

Image
Resolution
40%

20%

0%
1088 720 480 360 240 144

175
175 / 284 175 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Canal
Region
KPIs

176
176 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
177 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Zones Definition

Canal City

Canal Z1
Fayed Abou Sultan

Ismailia

Qantara

Canal Z4 Canal Z3 Canal Z2


Sokhna

Suez

PortSaid

Hurghada

178178 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call

Call Blocked Rate - Overall Call Blocked Rate - Zones


5%
0.65% 4%

1.71% 3%

2%
0.52%
1%
1.05%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).

Call Blocked Rate


5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

179179 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Retainability: Call Dropped Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call

Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones
5%
0.66% 4%

0.13% 3%

2%
0.26%
1%
0.53%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Voice Call Retainability is represented by call drop rates.

Voice Call Droped Rate


5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

180180 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%] 2/3/4G: Short Call

CSFB Failure Rate - Overall CSFB Failure Rate - Zones


5%
0.00% 4%

0.00% 3%

2%
0.00%
1%
0.00%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Ismailia Suez PortSaid

CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &
unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.
CSFB Failure Rate
5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

181181 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 2/3/4G: Short Call

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones
20%
3.37%

7.37%
10%
3.79%
4.06%
0%
0% 5% 10% 15% Ismailia Suez PortSaid

MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8


20%

10%

0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

182182 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Call Access Time - Overall Call Access Time - Zones


15
6.50
10
8.33

8.00 5

8.59
0
0 5 10 15 Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Call Access represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to the
receiving terminal.

Call Access Time


15

10

0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

183183 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones
5
0.92 4

1.14 3

2
0.96
1
0.97
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay


5

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

184184 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Telephony Return Delay - Overall Telephony Return Delay - Zones


5
1.03 4

1.04 3

2
1.20
1
1.02
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end

Telephony Return Delay


5

0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

185185 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Scores

Voice Speech Quality - Overall Voice Speech Quality - Zones


5
3.43 4

3.36 3

2
3.55
1
3.42
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Voice Speech Quality


5

0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

186186 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage

Call Technology Usage Overall Call technology Usage represents the call technology
used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the
better MOS served.
Vodafone 100% 0%

Orange 97% 3%
3G
Etisalat 100% 0% 2G

We 99% 1%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Codec Base Usage

Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR
wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end
AMR WideBand
user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)

AMR NarrowBand

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

187187 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes

40% 40%
2G Quality
3G Quality 3G Quality
20% RAN Issue 100%

25%

50% 50%
3G Quality 3G Quality
RAN Issue 75% RAN Issue

188188 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2

189189 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2

190190 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Failed Calls Causes

20%

38%

No service
60% 20% CSFB Issue
Other 62%
RAN Issue
RAN Issue

13%
25% 12%
3G Quality
12%
13%
Core Network
50% CSFB Issue
12% CSFB Issue
No service
25% Mobility Issue
RAN Issue 38%
Other
RAN Issue

191 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2

192192 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2

193193 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
194 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type
NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST
35,000 180,000

160,000
30,000

140,000

25,000
120,000

Maximum throughput
Average throughput

20,000
100,000

80,000
15,000

60,000
10,000

40,000

5,000
20,000

- -
20 sec Continuous Download 15 sec Continuous Upload 20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload
(400 MB file) (200 MB file)

195195 / 284 Vodafone Orange Etisalat We National


VodafoneTelecom
Max Orange Max Authority
Regulatory Etisalat Max| Benchmarking
We Max Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Download Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall 400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
37,500
32983 35,000
32,500
30,000
27,500
28092 25,000
22,500
20,000
17,500
31064 15,000
12,500
10,000
7,500
26129 5,000
2,500
0
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000 Ismailia Suez PortSaid

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps]


40,000
37,500
35,000
32,500
30,000
27,500
25,000
22,500
20,000
17,500
15,000
12,500
10,000
7,500
5,000
2,500
0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

196 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
30,000
11584 25,000

20,000
24720
15,000
22088 10,000

5,000
20015
0
0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000 10,50012,00013,50015,00016,50018,00019,50021,00022,50024,00025,50027,000 Ismailia Suez PortSaid

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps]


33,000
31,500
30,000
28,500
27,000
25,500
24,000
22,500
21,000
19,500
18,000
16,500
15,000
13,500
12,000
10,500
9,000
7,500
6,000
4,500
3,000
1,500
0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

197 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
10%
0.24%

0.12%
5%
1.32%

0.25%
0%
0% 5% 10% 15% Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Download Session Blocked Ratio


10%

5%

0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

198 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
10%
0.24%

0.12%
5%
1.06%

0.64%
0%
0% 5% 10% Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Upload Session Blocked Ratio


10%

5%

0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

199 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time - Zones
10
0.10 8

0.13 6

4
0.15
2
0.10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Average Session Setup Time


10

0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

200 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time - Zones
10
0.05 8

0.06 6

4
0.10
2
0.11
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Average Session Setup Time


10

0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

201 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall 20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
31,983 35,000
30,000
27,304 25,000
20,000
29,560 15,000
10,000
25,824 5,000
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Ismailia Suez PortSaid

20MB Download Throughput [kbps]


40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

202 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
20,000
4,452
15,000
14,125
10,000
11,505
5,000
10,202
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 Ismailia Suez PortSaid

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps]


20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

203 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

Session Failure Ratio - Overall Session Failure Ratio - Zones


5%
0.12% 4%

0.62% 3%

2%
1.73%
1%
0.89%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Session Failure Ratio


10%

5%

0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

204204 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time

Average Session Time - Overall Average Session Time - Zones


15
3.97
10
4.91

3.85 5

3.36
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Average Session Time


15

10

0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

205205 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

Session Failure Ratio - Overall Session Failure Ratio - Zones


10%
0.24%

0.00%
5%
1.85%

0.51%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Session Failure Ratio


10%

5%

0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

206206 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time

Average Session Time - Overall Average Session Time - Zones


10
2.32 8

2.40 6

4
2.15
2
2.12
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Average Session Time


10

0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

207207 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones
10%
0.24%

0.25%
5%
1.61%

0.64%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Ismailia Suez PortSaid

YouTube Session Failure Ratio


10%

5%

0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

208208 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Freezing Time [msec]

Freezing Time - Overall Freezing Time - Zones


300
12 250

200
328
150
27 100

50
16
0
0 100 200 300 400 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Freezing Time
600

500

400

300

200

100

0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

209209 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Video Quality

Video Quality [VMOS] - Overall Video Quality [VMOS] - Zones


5
4.10 4

4.06 3

2
4.09
1
4.09
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Video Quality - VMOS


5

0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

210210 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Time to 1st Picture

Time to First Picture [s] - Overall Time to First Picture [s] - Zones
5
1.89 4

2.36 3

2
1.58
1
1.74
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ismailia Suez PortSaid

Time to First Picture [s]


5

0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid

211211 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Youtube - Image Resolution
100%

80%

60%

Image
Resolution
40%

20%

0%
1088 720 480 360 240 144

212
212 / 284 212 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Upper Egypt
Region
KPIs

213
213 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
214 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Zones Definition Upper Egypt

Upper Z8 Upper Z7 Upper Z6 Upper Z5 Upper Z4 Upper Z3 upper Z2 Upper Z1


Fayoum

SinurisTirsa

BanySwif

Wasta

AbuQurqas

Menya

Asyut

DayroutManfalout

Sohag

TahtaAkhmim
Kharga
Dakhla
Farafra

Qena

Nagaa

Esna

Luxor

Aswan

Upper Z9
Abu Semble

Komombo

215215 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call

Call Blocked Rate - Overall Call Blocked Rate - Zones


18%
16%
2.55% 14%
12%
2.65% 10%
8%
4.35% 6%
4%
4.55% 2%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Call Blocked Calls represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).

Call Blocked Rate


34%
32%
30%
28%
26%
24%
22%
20%
18%
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

216216 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Retainability: Call Dropped Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call

Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones
5%
0.28% 4%

0.37% 3%

2%
0.61%
1%
0.52%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Voice Call Retainability is represented by call drop rates.

Voice Call Droped Rate


10%

8%

6%

4%

2%

0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

217217 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%] 2/3/4G: Short Call

CSFB Failure Rate - Overall CSFB Failure Rate - Zones


5%
0.15% 4%

0.00% 3%

2%
0.05%
1%
0.00%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &
unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.
CSFB Failure Rate
5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

218218 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 2/3/4G: Short Call

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones
15%
5.93%
10%
6.51%

5.14% 5%

6.29%
0%
0% 10% 20% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8


20%

15%

10%

5%

0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

219219 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Call Access Time - Overall Call Access Time - Zones


15
6.47
10
8.01

8.01 5

8.95
0
0 5 10 15 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Call Access Time


15

10

0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

220220 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones
5
0.89 4

0.92 3

2
1.09
1
1.21
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay


5

0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

221221 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call

Telephony Return Delay - Overall Telephony Return Delay - Zones


5
0.99 4

1.22 3

2
0.70
1
0.73
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end

Telephony Return Delay


5

0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

222222 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Scores

Voice Speech Quality - Overall Voice Speech Quality - Zones


5
3.38 4

3.34 3

2
3.50
1
3.39
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Voice Speech Quality


5

0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

223223 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage

Call Technology Usage Overall Call technology Usage represents the call technology
used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the
better MOS served.
Vodafone 96% 4%

Orange 99% 1%
3G
Etisalat 97% 3% 2G

We 96% 4%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Codec Base Usage

Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR
wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end HR
user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)

AMR WideBand

AMR NarrowBand

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

224224 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes

17% 13%
25%
33%
2G Coverage 2G Coverage
25%
2G Quality 3G Coverage
33%
17%
3G Quality 3G Quality
37%
RAN Issue RAN Issue

8% 9%
23% 18%

2G Quality 3G Coverage
3G Quality 3G Quality
69%
RAN Issue 73% RAN Issue

225225 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2

226226 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2

227227 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Failed Calls Causes

2G Coverage
3G Coverage
3G Coverage
14% 3G Quality 2%
22% 3G Quality
3% 4G Quality
2% 37%
Core Network
53% 7% CSFB Issue
CSFB Issue
14% 2%
Mobility Issue 7%
3% 2% Mobility Issue
2%
No service 3%
No service
2%
Other
14% 8% Other
3% Paging Issue
Paging Issue
RAN Issue
RAN Issue

7%

1%
3%
1% 7% 3G Quality
3%
2G Coverage
18%
1% 4G Coverage
19%
2% 3G Coverage 3%
2% 4G Quality
3G Quality
Core Network
4G Coverage 26%
27% 41% CSFB Issue
Core Network 37% 2%
Mobility Issue
CSFB Issue
No service
No service
Paging Issue
RAN Issue
RAN Issue

228 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2

229229 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2

230230 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
231 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type
NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST
35,000 120,000

30,000
100,000

25,000
80,000

Maximum throughput
Average throughput

20,000

60,000

15,000

40,000
10,000

20,000
5,000

- -
20 sec Continuous Download 15 sec Continuous Upload 20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload
(400 MB file) (200 MB file)

232232 / 284 Vodafone Orange Etisalat We National


Vodafone Max
Telecom Orange Max Authority
Regulatory Etisalat Max| Benchmarking
We Max Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Download Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall 400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
17132 35,000
30,000
30739 25,000
20,000
20614 15,000
10,000
25018 5,000
0
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps]


50,000
47,500
45,000
42,500
40,000
37,500
35,000
32,500
30,000
27,500
25,000
22,500
20,000
17,500
15,000
12,500
10,000
7,500
5,000
2,500
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra Hamadi - Daraw - Abu
Farashut Sembele

233 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
25,000
8663 20,000

16095 15,000

10,000
10558
5,000
14319
0
0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000 10,500 12,000 13,500 15,000 16,500 18,000 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps]


30,000
28,500
27,000
25,500
24,000
22,500
21,000
19,500
18,000
16,500
15,000
13,500
12,000
10,500
9,000
7,500
6,000
4,500
3,000
1,500
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra Hamadi - Daraw - Abu
Farashut Sembele

234 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
30%
1.75%
20%
1.26%

1.73% 10%

3.17%
0%
0% 5% 10% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Download Session Blocked Ratio


30%

20%

10%

0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

235 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
25%
1.89% 20%

0.95% 15%

10%
2.47%
5%
3.73%
0%
0% 5% 10% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Upload Session Blocked Ratio


25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

236 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.18 8

0.17 6

4
0.15
2
0.14
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Average Session Setup Time [sec]


10

0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

237 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.11 8

0.15 6

4
0.16
2
0.29
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Average Session Setup Time [sec]


10

0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

238 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall 20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
45,000
18,117 40,000
35,000
30,000
31,008 25,000
20,000
21,192 15,000
10,000
25,774 5,000
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

20MB Download Throughput [kbps]


45,000

40,000

35,000

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra Hamadi - Daraw - Abu
Farashut Sembele

239 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
15,000
4,210
10,000
9,921

9,408 5,000

8,051
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps]


20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra Hamadi - Daraw - Abu
Farashut Sembele

240 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

Session Failure Ratio - Overall Session Failure Ratio - Zones


25%
2.58% 20%

1.80% 15%

10%
2.34%
5%
4.29%
0%
0% 5% 10% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Session Failure Ratio


30%

20%

10%

0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

241241 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time

Average Session Time - Overall Average Session Time - Zones


10
4.74 8

4.71 6

4
4.68
2
4.04
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Average Session Time


10

0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

242242 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

Session Failure Ratio - Overall Session Failure Ratio - Zones


25%
2.57% 20%

1.88% 15%

10%
2.29%
5%
4.14%
0%
0% 5% 10% 15% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Session Failure Ratio


30%

20%

10%

0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

243243 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time

Average Session Time - Overall Average Session Time - Zones


10
2.50 8

2.30 6

4
2.42
2
2.51
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Average Session Time


10

0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

244244 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones
80%
2.52%
60%
2.44%
40%
6.28%
20%
12.84%
0%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

YouTube Session Failure Ratio


80%

60%

40%

20%

0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

245245 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Freezing Time [msec]

Freezing Time - Overall Freezing Time - Zones


2,000
183

242
1,000
131

350
0
0 200 400 600 800 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Freezing Time
2,000

1,000

0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

246246 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Video Quality

Video Quality [VMOS] - Overall Video Quality [VMOS] - Zones


5
4.05 4

4.02 3

2
4.06
1
4.03
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Video Quality - VMOS


5

0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

247247 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Time to 1st Picture

Time to First Picture [s] - Overall Time to First Picture [s] - Zones
10
2.17 8

2.26 6

4
1.99
2
2.38
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Time to First Picture [s]


10

0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele

248248 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Youtube - Image Resolution
100%

80%

60%

Image
Resolution
40%

20%

0%
1088 720 480 360 240 144

249
249 / 284 249 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
250 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
KPI definitions - Voice KPIs
Call Access: (non-Licensed KPI)
Call Blocked Rate: (licensed KPI) Represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete
The percentage of unsuccessful call setup attempts to the total destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to the
number of call attempts in a specified period. receiving terminal.
Threshold value = 2 %
CSFB Delay: (non-Licensed KPI)
Represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead
Call Dropped Rate: (licensed KPI) of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.
The percentage of dropped or interrupted calls without the
subscriber’s permission after successful call establishment to the Telephony Return Delay: (non-Licensed KPI)
total number of successfully established attempts. Measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network
Threshold value = 2 % after call end

Bad Speech Voice Quality Rate: (licensed KPI)


The percentage of bad speech voice calls (less than 2.8) scored
on MOS score which is a measure for end-to-end (mouth to ear)
speech quality of a voice service call to the total number of
completed calls. Threshold value = 10 %

CSFB Call Setup Failure Rate (licensed KPI)


The ratio between unsuccessful CSFB Call setup attempts to all
successful CSFB Call setup attempts for the calling UE.
Threshold value = 4 %

251 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
KPI definitions - Data KPIs
Session Blocked Rate: (Licensed KPI’s) YouTube Session Failure: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)
The Percentage ratio of number of data sessions setup that failed Stream session failure rate in percentage equal Total number of
to attach on the network data domain to the total number of Streams / Total number of failed Streams .
sessions.
Freezing Time: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)
Average freezing during stream in miliseconds. The relative amount of
Average Session Setup Time: (Licensed KPI’s) freezing in the stream, that is, the ratio between the total time of
freezings and the video sequence duration.
The time taken in seconds to access network data domain
averaged over all sessions. Video Quality: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)
Average of visual quality from an average of visual quality per video
stream. The predicted MOS value lies in the range of 1 to 5, where 1
Average http download throughput: (Licensed KPI’s) stands for bad, and 5 for excellent stream quality.
The average rate of successful data downloaded over a
communication channel. The throughput is measured in bits per Time to 1st Picture: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)
second (bit/s or bps). Average Time to first picture appear in seconds for the sessions.

Image Resolution: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)


Average http Upload throughput: (Licensed KPI’s) The total percentage of Image resolutions using in the clips.
The average rate of successful uploaded data over a
communication channel. The throughput is measured in bits per Browsing Session Failure: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)
second (bit/s or bps). The percentage of failed browsing sessions.

Browsing Session Time : (Non-Licensed KPI’s)


Presents the average time needed for browsing (download) a
webpage.

252 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Causes Definition will be added
Classification Definition

2G Coverage Weak GSM (2G) Coverage


2G Quality Weak GSM (2G) Quality
3G Coverage Weak UMTS (3G) Coverage
3G Quality Weak UMTS (3G) Quality
4G Coverage Weak LTE (4G) Coverage
4G Quality Weak LTE (4G) Quality
Core Network Problem related to core recourses not radio recourses
CSFB Issue Problem related to transfer the call to lower than LTE (4G)
technology
Mobility Issue Problems related to transfer call from one base station to another
No service No service
Paging Issue Problem related to delayed or missing paging
RAN Issue Problems related to grant the radio access
Other Timeouts

253 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Quantitative Information
Calls License Target value

Call Blocked Rate 2%

Dropped Call Rate 2%

Speech Voice Quality 10%

CSFB Call Setup Failure Rate 4%

Calls License Target value

Session Blocked Rate 10%

Average Session Setup Time 10 Sec

Average http download throughput 2.5 Mbps

Average http upload throughput 1.5 Mbps

254 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
THANK YOU

255 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

You might also like