Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NTRA April 2020 Benchmarking Report Full PDF
NTRA April 2020 Benchmarking Report Full PDF
1 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
رمس توضيحي "انفوجراف" ملؤرشات جودة
٢٠٢٠ خدمات احملمول يف شهر أبريل
2 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
• يف اطار حرص اجلهاز القويم لتنظمي التصالت عيل حتسني جودة خدمات التصالت املقدمة للمواطنني؛ أصدر اليوم املركز القويم ملراقبة جودة
خدمات التصالت التابع للجهاز القويم تقريره لنتاجئ قياسات شهر أبريل جلودة خدمات الصوت والانرتنت املقدمة من رشاكت التصالت العامةل
يف مرص؛ حيث مت اجراء اختبارات جودة اخلدمة خالل الشهر ملا يقرب من 24الف كيلو مرت من املناطق املأهوةل ابلساكن يف مجهورية مرص
العربية ،واملقسمة اىل ما يقرب من 80مدينة ويح؛ حيث متت القياسات خلدمات الصوت والبياانت ابجراء مئات الآلف من املاكملات
الاختبارية ابلضافة اىل اختبارات خدمات البياانت للمحمول.
• يمت تقيمي جودة اخلدمات الصوتية وفقا للمعايري ادلولية واليت من أمهها:
oمؤرش عدم بدء املاكملة ) (Call blockوهو يعرب عن عدم قدرة العميل عىل بدء املاكملة الصوتية.
oمؤرش انقطاع املاكملة ) (Call dropوهو يعرب عن انقطاع اخلط اثناء املاكملة الصوتية.
oمؤرش جودة صوت املاكملة ( )Voice qualityوهو يعرب عن متوسط مس توى جودة الصوت اثناء املاكملة الصوتية.
• فامي يمت تقيمي جودة اختبارات خدمات البياانت للمحمول وفقا ملعايري أمهها :
oرسعة تزنيل البياانت ( )Download Throughputويه رسعة تزنيل احملتوى من الش بكة للعميل.
oرسعة حتميل البياانت ) (Upload Throughputويه رسعة حتميل احملتوى من العميل اىل الش بكة.
3 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
فامي ييل اعداد املناطق (مدن وأحياء) اليت مت رصد اهنا تعاين من مشألك يف جودة اخلدمات الصوتية يف شهر ابريل :
• لرشكة فودافون :من أصل ( )80مدينة ويح مت اجراء اختبارات القياس علهيم مت رصد عدد ( )18مدينة ويح تعاين من تأثر يف مؤرش عدم بدء املاكملات ،من أمهها مدينيت
والعبور ومرص اجلديدة ومدينة نرص واملرج والسالم وحدائق القبة والعباس ية وشربا واملقطم يف القاهرة ،ومن حيث عدم أكامتل أو انقطاع املاكملات عدد ( )4مدينه ويح وأمهها
يف القاهرة املعادي ،ومن حيث جوده صوت املاكملات عدد ( )6مدينه ويح أمهها يف القاهرة مدينيت.
• ولرشكة اوراجن :من أصل ( )80مدينة ويح مت اجراء اختبارات القياس علهيم مت رصد عدد ( )23مدينة ويح تعاىن من تأثر يف مؤرش عدم بدء املاكملات ،من أمهها العبور
والتجمع ومدينة نرص والعباس ية وحلوان يف القاهرة والسادس من اكتوبر والش يخ زايد والهرم ويف اجلزية ،ويف السكندرية ،مناطق يف غرب الاسكندرية ومرىس مطروح ،ومن
حيث جوده صوت املاكملات عدد ( )11مدينه ويح أمهها مناطق يف رشق وغرب الاسكندرية.
• ولرشكة اتصالت :من أصل ( )80مدينة ويح مت اجراء اختبارات القياس علهيم مت رصد عدد ( )17مدينة ويح تعاىن من تأثر يف مؤرش عدم بدء املاكملات ،من أمهها مدينيت
والعبور وشربا والزماكل واملعادي واملقطم يف القاهرة ،ومن حيث عدم أكامتل أو انقطاع املاكملات عدد ( )7مدينه ويح وأمهها مدينيت والعبور وحلوان يف القاهرة ومناطق يف
رشق السكندرية ،ومن حيث جودة صوت املاكملات عدد ( )4امهها السادس من اكتوبر يف اجلزية.
• ولرشكة وى :من أصل ( )80مدينة ويح مت اجراء اختبارات القياس علهيم مت رصد عدد ( )24مدينة ويح تعاىن من تأثر يف مؤرش عدم بدء املاكملات ،من أمهها العبور
والرحاب ومرص اجلديدة ومدينة نرص وحدائق القبة والعباس ية واملنيل وشربا والزماكل وحلوان واملعادي واملقطم يف القاهرة ،ويف اجلزية الش يخ زايد ويف السكندرية رشق
السكندرية ،ومن حيث جوده صوت املاكملات عدد ( )5مدينه ويح أمهها السادس من اكتوبر يف اجلزية .
4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
• ويتضح من التقرير التفصييل أن معايري خدمات البياانت يف احلدود املقبوةل جليع الرشاكت وفقا للرتخيص مع متزي رشاكت أوراجن واتصالت يف رسعة تزنيل
البياانت فامي عدا بعض املناطق أوقات اذلروة (وفقا للتقرير التفصييل للك منطقة).
• ويأيت هذا التقرير يف اطار متابعة اجلهاز القويم لتنظمي التصالت جلودة اخلدمات املقدمة من مشغيل ش باكت التصالت يف السوق املرصي للمس تخدمني
ورفع وعي املس تخدمني مبؤرشات جودة هذه اخلدمات.
• وفامي ييل قامئة ابملناطق اليت مت رصد هبا حتسن أو سوء للخدمة حسب لك مشغل ومنطقة جغرافية:
5 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Benchmarking Report No. 10
APRIL 2020
10 10 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Executive
Summary
11
11 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
12 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Executive Summary
Due to the fact that NTRA in Egypt is concerned about maintaining the highest standards of the quality of the
network and getting the market insight about how operators are performing in the market from a QoS/QoE
perspective. NTRA along with Rohde and Schwarz carried out an extensive benchmarking survey of the Mobile
networks in Egypt with focus on the performance of the four operator’s network.
The full scope of measurements performed covers Egypt on monthly basis. Measurement is divided over
seven main regions, Cairo, Giza, Alexandria, Delta, Canal, Red Sea and Upper Egypt. Each area is consisting
of some clusters that will be measured during each month. And the results of each month will be discussed on
this presentation.
This presentation gives a summary view of April-20 measurements that took place in April 2020 for Egypt as
defined in later slides of this presentation, during this survey, a distance of ~ 24,000 KM’s were driven. All
measurements were done in Window time from 8AM to 8PM.
This presentation addressed 2nd, 3rd and 4th generation mobile networks (2G,3G,4G) for the Four licensees
Etisalat, Orange, Vodafone and WE (sorted alphabetically) in outdoors measurements. Key performance
indicators used in the survey are included in Annexes slides at the end of this presentation. For this campaign,
Mobile to Mobile voice scenario approach was followed to better represent customer experience in a
modernized manner.
13 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Quantitative Information
Voice Measurements Number of Tests
Total Number of Voice Calls 56,361
14 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Methodology
NTRA has preformed drive test that cover all governorates and major highways across the country. The
tests were in same time and condition for the four operators to ensure fair comparison.
NTRA measures the major “key performance indicators” (KPI) that directly relate to the public’s experience
through Outdoor (in-car user experience). These include block, dropped calls, voice quality, data
throughput. (all details will be found on annexes slides)
The drive test results represent a snapshot of the mobile service provider’s network in-car user experience
and using a particular type of smartphones to simulate end user. The reported level of service quality may
therefore not be exactly comparable with the consumer’s own experience;
The threshold for each KPI in license is mentioned in the legend of each graph. (and it is included in the
annexes slides) For better understand the results in reference to the threshold value:
• Every result exceeds the threshold value is considered as a violation to the license terms for Voice KPI’s.
• Every result exceeds the threshold value is considered as a violation to the license terms for Data KPI’s except for
Download Throughput and Upload throughput.
• Download Throughput and Upload throughput violation counted when the result is lower than the threshold value.
• We Denotes the violations where penalties are applied as dashed Dark RED Line
• We Denotes the violations where penalties are not applied as Solid Black Line
15 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Licensed-KPI’s Violation Percentage over Egypt (31 zones * 8 KPIs in license = 248 possible violations)
6%
4%
96%
94%
Violated KPI's - Voice Violated KPI's - Data Non-violated KPIs Violated KPI's - Voice Violated KPI's - Data Non-violated KPIs
4% 0.4% 4% 1%
96% 95%
Violated KPI's - Voice Violated KPI's - Data Non-violated KPIs Violated KPI's - Voice Violated KPI's - Data Non-violated KPIs
16 16 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Licensed-KPI’s Violation Percentage over Egypt
9%
29%
7% 64%
91%
Call blocked Rate Call Dropped Rate Call blocked Rate Call Dropped Rate MOS < 2.8
8%
10%
8%
10%
7%
77%
80%
Call blocked Rate Call Dropped Rate SBR UL Call blocked Rate Call Dropped Rate SBR DL SBR UL
17 17 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Call Blocked Rate - Zones
38%
36%
34%
32%
30%
28%
26%
24%
22%
20%
18%
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
18 18 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Call Dropped Rate - Zones
4.42%
6.25%
6.60%
4% 3.57%
2.11%
2.41%
2.11% 2.17%
3.20%
4.69% 2.04%
2.14% 2.20%
2.21%
3%
2%
1%
0%
19 19 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
CSFB Failure Rate - Zones
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
20 20 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Voice Speech Quality - Zones
13.56%
40%
11.48% 11.49% 12.92% 11.24% 11.68% 12.65% 11.94% 14.72% 11.43% 11.66%
10.19% 10.84% 14.62% 10.55% 10.73% 10.29% 10.38% 19.20% 12.53% 10.15% 12.04% 10.79% 16.30% 14.26% 11.91%
30%
20%
10%
0%
21 21 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
22 22 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
23 23 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
24 24 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
25 25 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Download Session Setup Time - Zones
26 26 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Upload Session Setup Time - Zones
27 27 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Cairo
Region
KPIs
28
28 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
29 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Zones Definition
Cairo
Madinity
Cairo Z1
Obour
Rehab
Sherouk
Tagamoaa
Heliopolis 1
Cairo Z2
Heliopolis 2
Nasr City 1
Nasr City 2
Ain Shams
Cairo Z3
ElMarg
ElSalam
Qobba Gardens
Abbasia
Cairo Z4
AlManyal
Shobra
Shobra ElKhamia
Zamalek
Helwan 1
Cairo Z5
Helwan 2
Maadi
Mokattam
30 30 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call
1.26% 6%
4%
1.51%
2%
2.28%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).
6%
4%
2%
0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
31 31 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Retainability: Call Dropped Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call
Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones
5%
0.82% 4%
0.19% 3%
2%
0.88%
1%
0.58%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
32 32 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%] 2/3/4G: Short Call
0.00% 3%
2%
0.00%
1%
0.00%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &
unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.
CSFB Failure Rate
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
33 33 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 2/3/4G: Short Call
Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones
20%
4.68%
15%
4.19%
10%
3.23%
5%
3.91%
0%
0% 10% 20% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples
15%
10%
5%
0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
34 34 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
10.05
0
0 5 10 15 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
Call Access Time represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to
the receiving terminal.
10
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
35 35 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones
5
0.71 4
0.84 3
2
0.84
1
0.88
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
36 36 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
0.80 3
2
0.60
1
0.62
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
37 37 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Scores
3.42 3
2
3.43
1
3.40
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
38 38 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage
Call Technology Usage Overall Call technology Usage represents the call technology
used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the
better MOS served.
Vodafone 98% 2%
Orange 100% 0%
3G
Etisalat 99% 1% 2G
We 99% 1%
Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR 0.06%
wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end EFR
user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)
AMR WideBand
AMR NarrowBand
39 39 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes
9%
20%
30%
2G Quality
43% 2G Quality
3G Quality
3G Quality
41% Mobility Issue 30%
Core Network
Other
RAN Issue
RAN Issue 20%
5%
2%
4%
45% 7%
2G Quality 2G Quality
32%
3G Quality 48% 3G Quality
Core Network Core Network
43% 10%
Mobility Issue Mobility Issue
4%
RAN Issue RAN Issue
3%
4%
40 40 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2
41 41 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2
42 42 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Failed Calls Causes
1% 7%
2G Quality 3%
21% 3G Quality
32%
3G Quality 3%
1% 4G Quality
4G Coverage
41% Core Network
13%
15% CSFB Issue
CSFB Issue
Mobility Issue
Mobility Issue
No service 25%
9% No service
8% Other
Paging Issue
1% 12% Paging Issue 7%
RAN Issue
RAN Issue 1%
15% 3G Quality
11% 3G Quality
26% 4G Quality
20% 4G Quality
13%
Core Network 10%
5% Core Network
CSFB Issue 7%
5% 9% CSFB Issue
Mobility Issue
Mobility Issue
1% No service
12% 23% No service
1% Other 15%
18% Paging Issue
9% Paging Issue
RAN Issue
RAN Issue
43 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2
44 44 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2
45 45 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
46 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type
NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST
35,000 140,000
30,000 120,000
25,000 100,000
Maximum throughput
Average throughput
20,000 80,000
15,000 60,000
10,000 40,000
5,000 20,000
- -
20 sec Continuous Download 15 sec Continuous Upload 20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload
(400 MB file) (200 MB file)
400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall 400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
20057 35,000
30,000
31071 25,000
20,000
26396 15,000
10,000
24696 5,000
0
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
48 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance
200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
30,000
10084 25,000
20,000
24266
15,000
10153 10,000
5,000
15676
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
49 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates
Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
20%
0.48%
15%
0.39%
10%
0.41%
5%
0.88%
0%
0% 5% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
15%
10%
5%
0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
50 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates
Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
15%
0.45%
10%
0.42%
0.22% 5%
1.16%
0%
0% 5% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
15%
10%
5%
0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
51 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time
Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.18 8
0.10 6
4
0.20
2
0.10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
52 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time
Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.06 8
0.04 6
4
0.11
2
0.10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
53 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience
20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall
20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
35,000
19,634
30,000
29,278 25,000
20,000
26,117 15,000
10,000
23,572 5,000
0 10,000 20,000 30,000 0
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el ElKhamia Town
Mostkbal
54 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience
2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
20,000
4,461
15,000
13,254
10,000
9,710
5,000
9,029
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el ElKhamia Town
Mostkbal
55 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
0.49%
5%
0.38%
1.63%
0%
0% 5% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
10%
0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
56 56 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time
4.15 6
4
4.80
2
3.16
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
10
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
57 57 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
0.40%
5%
0.36%
1.33%
0%
0% 5% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
15%
10%
5%
0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
58 58 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time
2.00 6
4
2.31
2
1.85
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
59 59 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones
20%
3.54%
15%
0.57%
10%
0.55%
5%
2.66%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
60 60 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Freezing Time [msec]
Freezing Time
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el ElKhamia Town
Mostkbal
61 61 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Video Quality
4.09 3
2
4.08
1
4.09
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
62 62 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Time to 1st Picture
Time to First Picture [s] - Overall Time to First Picture [s] - Zones
5
2.14 4
1.74 3
2
1.79
1
1.70
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
0
Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk - Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_Down Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam
Madinet el Town
Mostkbal
63 63 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Youtube - Image Resolution
100%
80%
60%
Image
Resolution
40%
20%
0%
1088 720 480 360 240 144
64
64 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Giza
Region
KPIs
65
65 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
66 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Zones Definition
Giza
Zayed 1
Giza Z1
Zayed 2
6th of Oct 1
6th of Oct 2
Giza Z3 Giza Z2
Faisal
Haram
Embaba
Mohandseen
67 67 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call
0.57% 2%
1.12%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).
6%
4%
2%
0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
68 68 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Retainability: Call Dropped Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call
Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones
5%
0.26% 4%
0.31% 3%
2%
0.47%
1%
0.36%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
69 69 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%] 2/3/4G: Short Call
0.00% 3%
0.00% 2%
1%
0.00%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &
unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.
CSFB Failure Rate
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
70 70 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 2/3/4G: Short Call
Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones
10%
3.50%
3.99%
5%
4.99%
5.32%
0%
0% 5% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples
10%
5%
0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
71 71 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
7.75 5
9.11
0
0 5 10 15 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Call Access represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to the
receiving terminal.
10
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
72 72 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones
5
0.73 4
0.79 3
2
0.65
1
0.89
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
73 73 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
0.85 3
2
0.66
1
0.71
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
74 74 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Scores
3.42 3
2
3.52
1
3.40
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
75 75 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage
Call Technology Usage Overall Call technology Usage represents the call technology
used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the
better MOS served.
Vodafone 100% 0%
Orange 100%
3G
Etisalat 99% 2G
We 99%
Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR
wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end
AMR WideBand
user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)
AMR NarrowBand
76 76 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes
2G Quality
3G Quality 17%
20% 60% 3G Quality
Mobility Issue
Core Network
RAN Issue 50%
RAN Issue
44% 43%
56% 57%
3G Quality 3G Quality
RAN Issue RAN Issue
77 77 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2
78 78 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2
79 79 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Failed Calls Causes
22%
22% 3G Quality
11%
38% 4G Quality
3G Quality 3%
5% Core Network
CSFB Issue
45% CSFB Issue
22% Mobility Issue 5%
8% 19% Mobility Issue
RAN Issue
No service
RAN Issue
9% 9% 14% 3G Quality
27%
3G Quality 36% 4G Quality
9% 9%
CSFB Issue CSFB Issue
No service 14% Mobility Issue
46% Other 14% No service
Paging Issue Paging Issue
9% RAN Issue
4%
80 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2
81 81 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2
82 82 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
83 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type
NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST
40,000 140,000
35,000
120,000
30,000
100,000
Maximum throughput
25,000
Average throughput
80,000
20,000
60,000
15,000
40,000
10,000
20,000
5,000
- -
20 sec Continuous Download 15 sec Continuous Upload 20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload
(400 MB file) (200 MB file)
Vodafone Orange Etisalat We Vodafone Max Orange Max Etisalat Max We Max
84 84 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Download Transfer Throughput – Network Performance
400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall 400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
45,000
20213 40,000
35,000
30,000
34403 25,000
20,000
27514 15,000
10,000
23097 5,000
0
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000 37,500 40,000 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
85 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance
200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
35,000
11650 30,000
25,000
26119 20,000
15,000
6931
10,000
13137 5,000
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
86 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates
Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
10%
0.48%
0.13%
5%
0.80%
0.32%
0%
0% 5% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
5%
0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
87 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates
Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
10%
0.24%
0.04%
5%
0.50%
0.75%
0%
0% 5% 10% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
5%
0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
88 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time
Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.24 8
0.10 6
4
0.24
2
0.13
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
89 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time [sec]
Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.05 8
0.05 6
4
0.12
2
0.13
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
90 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience
20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall 20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
19,920 35,000
30,000
32,252 25,000
20,000
27,169 15,000
10,000
22,548 5,000
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
91 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience
2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
20,000
4,615
15,000
14,083
10,000
11,159
5,000
7,463
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
92 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
0.04% 3%
2%
0.95%
1%
1.02%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
93 93 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time
4.28
5
5.13
3.31
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
94 94 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
0.13% 3%
2%
1.25%
1%
1.12%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
95 95 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time
1.88 6
4
2.30
2
1.89
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
96 96 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones
5%
0.39% 4%
0.18% 3%
2%
0.81%
1%
1.14%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
97 97 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Freezing Time [msec]
200
44.63
150
75.56 100
50
47.86
0
0 50 100 150 200 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Freezing Time
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
98 98 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Video Quality
4.09 3
2
4.09
1
4.09
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
99 99 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Time to 1st Picture
Time to First Picture [s] - Overall Time to First Picture [s] - Zones
5
2.05 4
1.71 3
2
1.83
1
1.72
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
100100 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Youtube - Image Resolution
100%
80%
60%
Image
Resolution
40%
20%
0%
1088 720 480 360 240 144
101 / 284 101 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Alexandria
Region
KPIs
102
102 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
103 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Zones Definition
Alexandria
East1
East2
Alex Z1
East3
East4
East5
West 1
Alex Z3 Alex Z2
West 2
Matrouh
Northencoast
104104 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call
1.38% 3%
2%
0.54%
1%
1.40%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).
10%
5%
0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
105105 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Retainability: Call Dropped Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call
Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones
5%
0.39% 4%
0.23% 3%
2%
0.46%
1%
0.39%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
106106 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%] 2/3/4G: Short Call
0.00% 3%
2%
0.00%
1%
0.00%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &
unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.
CSFB Failure Rate
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
107107 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 2/3/4G: Short Call
Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones
20%
4.31%
8.71%
10%
4.48%
4.77%
0%
0% 10% 20% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples
10%
0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
108108 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
7.50 5
8.61
0
0 5 10 15 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
Call Access Time represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to
the receiving terminal.
10
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
109109 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones
5
0.67 4
1.13 3
2
0.65
1
0.83
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
110110 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
1.11 3
2
0.66
1
0.73
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
111111 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Scores
3.33 3
2
3.52
1
3.41
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
112112 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage
Call Technology Usage Overall Call technology Usage represents the call technology
used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the
better MOS served.
Vodafone 99% 1%
Orange 95% 5%
3G
Etisalat 99% 1% 2G
We 99% 1%
Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR
wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end HR
user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)
AMR WB
AMR NB
113113 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes
20%
33%
3G Quality
20% 60% 2G Quality
Mobility Issue 67%
3G Quality
RAN Issue
33% 40%
60%
3G Quality 3G Quality
67%
RAN Issue RAN Issue
114114 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2
115115 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2
116116 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Failed Calls Causes
6%
13% 5%
25%
28%
3G Quality 3G Quality
4G Coverage 28% Core Network
38%
12% Mobility Issue CSFB Issue
No service Mobility Issue
3G Quality
11% 17% 4G Quality
17% 5%
Core Network
43%
5% CSFB Issue
57% 3G Quality
11% Mobility Issue
CSFB Issue 6%
17% 11% No service
Other
Paging Issue
RAN Issue
117 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2
118118 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2
119119 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
120 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type
NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST
35,000 220,000
200,000
30,000
180,000
25,000 160,000
140,000
Maximum throughput
Average throughput
20,000
120,000
100,000
15,000
80,000
10,000 60,000
40,000
5,000
20,000
- -
20 sec Continuous Download 15 sec Continuous Upload 20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload
(400 MB file) (200 MB file)
400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall 400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
50,000
45,000
32249 40,000
35,000
29393 30,000
25,000
20,000
26826 15,000
10,000
28313 5,000
0
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
122 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance
200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
30,000
27,000
11689 24,000
21,000
22745 18,000
15,000
12,000
6266 9,000
6,000
16524 3,000
0
0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000 10,500 12,000 13,500 15,000 16,500 18,000 19,500 21,000 22,500 24,000 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
123 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates
Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
10%
0.07%
0.07%
5%
0.45%
0.16%
0%
0% 5% 10% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
10%
5%
0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
124 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates
Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
10%
0.07%
0.07%
5%
0.37%
0.24%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
10%
5%
0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
125 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time
Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.16 8
0.12 6
4
0.29
2
0.11
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
126 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time
Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.04 8
0.06 6
4
0.12
2
0.12
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
127 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience
20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall 20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
29,309 35,000
30,000
27,370 25,000
20,000
26,259 15,000
10,000
26,992 5,000
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
50,000
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
128 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience
2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
15,000
4,783
10,000
9,988
7,831 5,000
8,650
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
10,000
5,000
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
129 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
0.07%
5%
0.60%
0.33%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
10%
5%
0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
130130 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time
3.73 6
4
5.41
2
3.43
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
10
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
131131 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
0.07%
5%
0.52%
0.24%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
5%
0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
132132 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time
Average Session Time - Overall Average Session Time - Zones
10
1.94 8
1.91 6
4
2.41
2
2.04
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
133133 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones
10%
0.27%
0.07%
5%
0.60%
0.49%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
5%
0%
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
134134 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Freezing Time [msec]
16
50
19
8
0
0 50 100 150 200 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
Freezing Time
200
150
100
50
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
135135 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Video Quality
4.10 3
2
4.06
1
4.08
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
136136 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Time to 1st Picture
Time to First Picture [s] - Overall Time to First Picture [s] - Zones
5
1.77 4
1.79 3
2
1.82
1
1.75
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 East Alex West Alex Northen Coast
0
East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast
137137 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Youtube - Image Resolution
100%
80%
60%
Image
Resolution
40%
20%
0%
1088 720 480 360 240 144
138
138 / 284 138 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Delta
Region
KPIs
139
139 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
140 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Zones Definition
Delta Cities
Delta Z1
Banha
Qalyoub
Qanatir
Delta Z2
10th of ramadan
Faqous
Zagazig
Delta Z3
Damnhour
Kafr Eldawar
Delta Z4
Kafr el Zayat
Tanta - Mahalla
Delta Z5
Desouk
Kafr El sheikh
Delta Z6
Mansoura
Senbelawen
Domyat
Delta Z7
Ras El bar
Delta Z8
Menoufbagour
Shebin el Koum
141141 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call
8%
1.13%
6%
1.34% 4%
2%
2.40%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).
142142 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Retainability: Call Dropped Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call
Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones
5%
0.85% 4%
0.17% 3%
2%
0.51%
1%
0.47%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
143143 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%] 2/3/4G: Short Call
0.04% 3%
2%
0.00%
1%
0.00%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &
unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.
CSFB Failure Rate
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
144144 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 2/3/4G: Short Call
Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones
20%
5.24%
7.14%
10%
4.34%
4.92%
0%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples
10%
0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
145145 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
8.81
0
0 5 10 15 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
Call Access represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to the
receiving terminal.
10
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
146146 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones
5
0.61 4
0.85 3
2
0.75
1
0.79
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
147147 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
1.15 3
2
0.83
1
0.76
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
148148 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Scores
3.34 3
2
3.48
1
3.39
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
149149 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage
Call Technology Usage Overall Call technology Usage represents the call technology
used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the
better MOS served.
Vodafone 98% 2%
Orange 99% 1%
3G
Etisalat 99% 1% 2G
We 99% 1%
Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR 0.09%
wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end EFR 0.09%
user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)
AMR WB
AMR NB
150150 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes
5%
10% 2G Coverage 25%
30%
2G Quality
50% 3G Quality
3G Quality
10% 40% Mobility Issue
Core Network 25%
5% RAN Issue
Mobility Issue
RAN Issue
9% 9%
18% 3G Coverage
3G Coverage
50% 33% 3G Quality
55%
3G Quality 9%
Core Network
Core Network 9%
8% Mobility Issue
RAN Issue
RAN Issue
151151 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2
152152 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2
153153 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Failed Calls Causes
4%
4%
3G Quality
7%
4% 4G Coverage
29% 18%
3G Coverage 7% 4G Quality
3G Quality 48% CSFB Issue
11%
Mobility Issue Mobility Issue
21%
No service 11% No service
28% 4%
RAN Issue 4%
Other
Paging Issue
RAN Issue
2%
12%
12%
2G Quality
2% 5%
9% 2% 3G Quality
3G Quality
4G Quality
13% CSFB Issue 67% 11%
Core Network
66% No service
CSFB Issue
RAN Issue
Paging Issue
RAN Issue
154 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2
155155 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2
156156 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
157 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type
NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST
35,000 140,000
30,000 120,000
25,000 100,000
Maximum throughput
Average throughput
20,000 80,000
15,000 60,000
10,000 40,000
5,000 20,000
- -
20 sec Continuous Download 15 sec Continuous Upload 20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload
(400 MB file) (200 MB file)
400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall 400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
22689 35,000
30,000
29176 25,000
20,000
23662 15,000
27152 10,000
5,000
0
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
159 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance
200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
25,000
12205 20,000
17143 15,000
10,000
12401
5,000
13288
0
0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000 10,500 12,000 13,500 15,000 16,500 18,000 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
160 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates
Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
15%
0.19%
10%
0.11%
0.13% 5%
0.38%
0%
0% 5% 10% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
5%
0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
161 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates
Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
15%
0.23%
10%
0.07%
0.17% 5%
0.13%
0%
0% 5% 10% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
10%
5%
0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
162 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time
Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.14 8
0.15 6
4
0.16
2
0.11
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
163 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time
Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.06 8
0.07 6
4
0.14
2
0.13
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
164 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience
20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall 20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
21,876 35,000
30,000
28,182 25,000
20,000
23,838 15,000
10,000
26,886 5,000
0
0 10,000 20,000 30,000 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
165 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience
2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
15,000
4,614
10,000
10,388
8,266 5,000
8,205
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
166 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
0.26%
5%
0.34%
0.46%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
5%
0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
167167 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time
4.68 5
3.43
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
10
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
168168 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
0.11%
5%
0.26%
0.25%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
5%
0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
169169 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time
2.32 6
4
2.56
2
2.22
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
170170 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones
25%
0.63% 20%
0.33% 15%
10%
3.52%
5%
0.72%
0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
171171 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Freezing Time [msec]
800
81
600
142 400
200
109
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
Freezing Time
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
172172 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Video Quality
4.08 3
2
4.06
1
4.06
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
173173 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Time to 1st Picture
Time to First Picture [s] - Overall Time to First Picture [s] - Zones
5
1.96 4
1.88 3
2
2.10
1
1.91
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya
0
Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th of Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta - Desouk - Kafr Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf - Shebin el
ramadan Mahalla Ghounim bagour Koum
174174 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Youtube - Image Resolution
100%
80%
60%
Image
Resolution
40%
20%
0%
1088 720 480 360 240 144
175
175 / 284 175 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Canal
Region
KPIs
176
176 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
177 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Zones Definition
Canal City
Canal Z1
Fayed Abou Sultan
Ismailia
Qantara
Suez
PortSaid
Hurghada
178178 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call
1.71% 3%
2%
0.52%
1%
1.05%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% Ismailia Suez PortSaid
Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
179179 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Retainability: Call Dropped Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call
Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones
5%
0.66% 4%
0.13% 3%
2%
0.26%
1%
0.53%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Ismailia Suez PortSaid
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
180180 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%] 2/3/4G: Short Call
0.00% 3%
2%
0.00%
1%
0.00%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Ismailia Suez PortSaid
CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &
unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.
CSFB Failure Rate
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
181181 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 2/3/4G: Short Call
Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones
20%
3.37%
7.37%
10%
3.79%
4.06%
0%
0% 5% 10% 15% Ismailia Suez PortSaid
MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples
10%
0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
182182 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
8.00 5
8.59
0
0 5 10 15 Ismailia Suez PortSaid
Call Access represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to the
receiving terminal.
10
0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
183183 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones
5
0.92 4
1.14 3
2
0.96
1
0.97
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
184184 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
1.04 3
2
1.20
1
1.02
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Ismailia Suez PortSaid
Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end
0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
185185 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Scores
3.36 3
2
3.55
1
3.42
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Ismailia Suez PortSaid
0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
186186 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage
Call Technology Usage Overall Call technology Usage represents the call technology
used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the
better MOS served.
Vodafone 100% 0%
Orange 97% 3%
3G
Etisalat 100% 0% 2G
We 99% 1%
Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR
wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end
AMR WideBand
user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)
AMR NarrowBand
187187 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes
40% 40%
2G Quality
3G Quality 3G Quality
20% RAN Issue 100%
25%
50% 50%
3G Quality 3G Quality
RAN Issue 75% RAN Issue
188188 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2
189189 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2
190190 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Failed Calls Causes
20%
38%
No service
60% 20% CSFB Issue
Other 62%
RAN Issue
RAN Issue
13%
25% 12%
3G Quality
12%
13%
Core Network
50% CSFB Issue
12% CSFB Issue
No service
25% Mobility Issue
RAN Issue 38%
Other
RAN Issue
191 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2
192192 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2
193193 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
194 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type
NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST
35,000 180,000
160,000
30,000
140,000
25,000
120,000
Maximum throughput
Average throughput
20,000
100,000
80,000
15,000
60,000
10,000
40,000
5,000
20,000
- -
20 sec Continuous Download 15 sec Continuous Upload 20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload
(400 MB file) (200 MB file)
400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall 400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
37,500
32983 35,000
32,500
30,000
27,500
28092 25,000
22,500
20,000
17,500
31064 15,000
12,500
10,000
7,500
26129 5,000
2,500
0
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000 Ismailia Suez PortSaid
196 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance
200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
30,000
11584 25,000
20,000
24720
15,000
22088 10,000
5,000
20015
0
0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000 10,50012,00013,50015,00016,50018,00019,50021,00022,50024,00025,50027,000 Ismailia Suez PortSaid
197 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates
Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
10%
0.24%
0.12%
5%
1.32%
0.25%
0%
0% 5% 10% 15% Ismailia Suez PortSaid
5%
0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
198 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates
Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
10%
0.24%
0.12%
5%
1.06%
0.64%
0%
0% 5% 10% Ismailia Suez PortSaid
5%
0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
199 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time
Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time - Zones
10
0.10 8
0.13 6
4
0.15
2
0.10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Ismailia Suez PortSaid
0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
200 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time
Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time - Zones
10
0.05 8
0.06 6
4
0.10
2
0.11
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Ismailia Suez PortSaid
0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
201 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience
20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall 20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
31,983 35,000
30,000
27,304 25,000
20,000
29,560 15,000
10,000
25,824 5,000
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Ismailia Suez PortSaid
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
202 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience
2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
20,000
4,452
15,000
14,125
10,000
11,505
5,000
10,202
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 Ismailia Suez PortSaid
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
203 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
0.62% 3%
2%
1.73%
1%
0.89%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Ismailia Suez PortSaid
5%
0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
204204 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time
3.85 5
3.36
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Ismailia Suez PortSaid
10
0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
205205 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
0.00%
5%
1.85%
0.51%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Ismailia Suez PortSaid
5%
0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
206206 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time
2.40 6
4
2.15
2
2.12
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Ismailia Suez PortSaid
0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
207207 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones
10%
0.24%
0.25%
5%
1.61%
0.64%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Ismailia Suez PortSaid
5%
0%
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
208208 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Freezing Time [msec]
200
328
150
27 100
50
16
0
0 100 200 300 400 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Freezing Time
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen
209209 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Video Quality
4.06 3
2
4.09
1
4.09
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Ismailia Suez PortSaid
0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
210210 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Time to 1st Picture
Time to First Picture [s] - Overall Time to First Picture [s] - Zones
5
1.89 4
2.36 3
2
1.58
1
1.74
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ismailia Suez PortSaid
0
Ismailia Sokhna Suez PortSaid
211211 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Youtube - Image Resolution
100%
80%
60%
Image
Resolution
40%
20%
0%
1088 720 480 360 240 144
212
212 / 284 212 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Upper Egypt
Region
KPIs
213
213 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
214 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Zones Definition Upper Egypt
SinurisTirsa
BanySwif
Wasta
AbuQurqas
Menya
Asyut
DayroutManfalout
Sohag
TahtaAkhmim
Kharga
Dakhla
Farafra
Qena
Nagaa
Esna
Luxor
Aswan
Upper Z9
Abu Semble
Komombo
215215 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call
Call Blocked Calls represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).
216216 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Retainability: Call Dropped Rate 2/3/4G: Short Call
Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones
5%
0.28% 4%
0.37% 3%
2%
0.61%
1%
0.52%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
217217 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%] 2/3/4G: Short Call
0.00% 3%
2%
0.05%
1%
0.00%
0%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &
unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.
CSFB Failure Rate
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
218218 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 2/3/4G: Short Call
Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones
15%
5.93%
10%
6.51%
5.14% 5%
6.29%
0%
0% 10% 20% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples
15%
10%
5%
0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
219219 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
8.01 5
8.95
0
0 5 10 15 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
10
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
220220 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones
5
0.89 4
0.92 3
2
1.09
1
1.21
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
221221 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.] 2/3/4G: Short Call
1.22 3
2
0.70
1
0.73
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
222222 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: MOS Scores
3.34 3
2
3.50
1
3.39
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
223223 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage
Call Technology Usage Overall Call technology Usage represents the call technology
used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the
better MOS served.
Vodafone 96% 4%
Orange 99% 1%
3G
Etisalat 97% 3% 2G
We 96% 4%
Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR
wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end HR
user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)
AMR WideBand
AMR NarrowBand
224224 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes
17% 13%
25%
33%
2G Coverage 2G Coverage
25%
2G Quality 3G Coverage
33%
17%
3G Quality 3G Quality
37%
RAN Issue RAN Issue
8% 9%
23% 18%
2G Quality 3G Coverage
3G Quality 3G Quality
69%
RAN Issue 73% RAN Issue
225225 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2
226226 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2
227227 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Analysis: Failed Calls Causes
2G Coverage
3G Coverage
3G Coverage
14% 3G Quality 2%
22% 3G Quality
3% 4G Quality
2% 37%
Core Network
53% 7% CSFB Issue
CSFB Issue
14% 2%
Mobility Issue 7%
3% 2% Mobility Issue
2%
No service 3%
No service
2%
Other
14% 8% Other
3% Paging Issue
Paging Issue
RAN Issue
RAN Issue
7%
1%
3%
1% 7% 3G Quality
3%
2G Coverage
18%
1% 4G Coverage
19%
2% 3G Coverage 3%
2% 4G Quality
3G Quality
Core Network
4G Coverage 26%
27% 41% CSFB Issue
Core Network 37% 2%
Mobility Issue
CSFB Issue
No service
No service
Paging Issue
RAN Issue
RAN Issue
228 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2
229229 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2
230230 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
231 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type
NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST
35,000 120,000
30,000
100,000
25,000
80,000
Maximum throughput
Average throughput
20,000
60,000
15,000
40,000
10,000
20,000
5,000
- -
20 sec Continuous Download 15 sec Continuous Upload 20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload
(400 MB file) (200 MB file)
400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall 400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
40,000
17132 35,000
30,000
30739 25,000
20,000
20614 15,000
10,000
25018 5,000
0
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
233 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance
200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
25,000
8663 20,000
16095 15,000
10,000
10558
5,000
14319
0
0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000 10,500 12,000 13,500 15,000 16,500 18,000 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
234 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates
Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
30%
1.75%
20%
1.26%
1.73% 10%
3.17%
0%
0% 5% 10% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
20%
10%
0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
235 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates
Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones
25%
1.89% 20%
0.95% 15%
10%
2.47%
5%
3.73%
0%
0% 5% 10% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
236 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time
Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.18 8
0.17 6
4
0.15
2
0.14
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
237 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time
Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones
10
0.11 8
0.15 6
4
0.16
2
0.29
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
238 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience
20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall 20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones
45,000
18,117 40,000
35,000
30,000
31,008 25,000
20,000
21,192 15,000
10,000
25,774 5,000
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra Hamadi - Daraw - Abu
Farashut Sembele
239 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience
2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall 2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones
15,000
4,210
10,000
9,921
9,408 5,000
8,051
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra Hamadi - Daraw - Abu
Farashut Sembele
240 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
1.80% 15%
10%
2.34%
5%
4.29%
0%
0% 5% 10% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
20%
10%
0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
241241 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time
4.71 6
4
4.68
2
4.04
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
242242 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
1.88% 15%
10%
2.29%
5%
4.14%
0%
0% 5% 10% 15% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
20%
10%
0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
243243 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Time
2.30 6
4
2.42
2
2.51
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
244244 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Session Failure Ratio
YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones
80%
2.52%
60%
2.44%
40%
6.28%
20%
12.84%
0%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
60%
40%
20%
0%
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
245245 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Freezing Time [msec]
242
1,000
131
350
0
0 200 400 600 800 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
Freezing Time
2,000
1,000
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
246246 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Video Quality
4.02 3
2
4.06
1
4.03
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
247247 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Time to 1st Picture
Time to First Picture [s] - Overall Time to First Picture [s] - Zones
10
2.17 8
2.26 6
4
1.99
2
2.38
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan
0
Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout - Sohag Tahta - Kharga - Nagaa Hamadi Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -
Manfalout Akhmim Fararfra - Farashut Daraw - Abu
Sembele
248248 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Youtube - Image Resolution
100%
80%
60%
Image
Resolution
40%
20%
0%
1088 720 480 360 240 144
249
249 / 284 249 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
AGENDA
1. Executive Summary
2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo
3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo
4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza
5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza
6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria
8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta
9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta
10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal
11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal
12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt
14. Annexes
250 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
KPI definitions - Voice KPIs
Call Access: (non-Licensed KPI)
Call Blocked Rate: (licensed KPI) Represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete
The percentage of unsuccessful call setup attempts to the total destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to the
number of call attempts in a specified period. receiving terminal.
Threshold value = 2 %
CSFB Delay: (non-Licensed KPI)
Represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead
Call Dropped Rate: (licensed KPI) of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.
The percentage of dropped or interrupted calls without the
subscriber’s permission after successful call establishment to the Telephony Return Delay: (non-Licensed KPI)
total number of successfully established attempts. Measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network
Threshold value = 2 % after call end
251 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
KPI definitions - Data KPIs
Session Blocked Rate: (Licensed KPI’s) YouTube Session Failure: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)
The Percentage ratio of number of data sessions setup that failed Stream session failure rate in percentage equal Total number of
to attach on the network data domain to the total number of Streams / Total number of failed Streams .
sessions.
Freezing Time: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)
Average freezing during stream in miliseconds. The relative amount of
Average Session Setup Time: (Licensed KPI’s) freezing in the stream, that is, the ratio between the total time of
freezings and the video sequence duration.
The time taken in seconds to access network data domain
averaged over all sessions. Video Quality: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)
Average of visual quality from an average of visual quality per video
stream. The predicted MOS value lies in the range of 1 to 5, where 1
Average http download throughput: (Licensed KPI’s) stands for bad, and 5 for excellent stream quality.
The average rate of successful data downloaded over a
communication channel. The throughput is measured in bits per Time to 1st Picture: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)
second (bit/s or bps). Average Time to first picture appear in seconds for the sessions.
252 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Causes Definition will be added
Classification Definition
253 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
Quantitative Information
Calls License Target value
254 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020
THANK YOU
255 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020