Ancient civilizations like the Sumerians, Babylonians, Egyptians, Chinese dynasties, Greeks, and Romans all contributed to early management thought. The Sumerians developed the use of coins for trade. The Babylonians established written laws and commands. The Egyptians specialized labor and implemented span of control. Chinese dynasties developed bureaucracy and meritocracy. Greeks specialized labor and recognized the importance of information sharing. Romans standardized management practices.
Ancient civilizations like the Sumerians, Babylonians, Egyptians, Chinese dynasties, Greeks, and Romans all contributed to early management thought. The Sumerians developed the use of coins for trade. The Babylonians established written laws and commands. The Egyptians specialized labor and implemented span of control. Chinese dynasties developed bureaucracy and meritocracy. Greeks specialized labor and recognized the importance of information sharing. Romans standardized management practices.
Ancient civilizations like the Sumerians, Babylonians, Egyptians, Chinese dynasties, Greeks, and Romans all contributed to early management thought. The Sumerians developed the use of coins for trade. The Babylonians established written laws and commands. The Egyptians specialized labor and implemented span of control. Chinese dynasties developed bureaucracy and meritocracy. Greeks specialized labor and recognized the importance of information sharing. Romans standardized management practices.
civilizations make to management thought? SUMERIANS- Through writing they conceptualized the use of coins for they to be flourished in the merchant culture better than before. BABYLONIANS- Written laws and commands serve as the context that leads to disciplined management which also later come up to the idea of giving incentives as a motivation to work harder. EGYPTIANS- Through observation, they come up that segregation labors through coordination and specialization will help to emphasized detailed projects and with the addition of span of control they manage the workers very well to give more look to the details. DYNASTIES IN CHINA- To focus in different aspects of society, they contemplated and organized the idea of bureaucracy. Through this you can only focus on what aspects will be given to you, like bureau of defense, treasury and etc. To give more emphasis, the idea of meritocracy was being developed to promote certain officials to work diligently and productively. GREEKS- As Plato recognized the human diversity, the Greeks organized to divide labor in different specializations. Through noticing the development of managerial skills, Socrates tells that information sharing and analysis with coordination will surely help in working efficiently. ROMANS- Slavery is one of the most inhumane acts of managing a worker but due to economic changes, Roman workers starting to have freedom. Also, the Romans influence the standardization in managerial aspects, through this it can build a lot of detailed information through a corporation that the Romans also developed.
2. How did the Industrial Revolution change
business and the economy?
The establishment of the marketplace
enhanced the organizing and exchanging of goods. The idea of specialization and coordination within corporation by Adam Smith developed the segregation of labor and specialized workers within the management and the workers. The invention of steam engine lowered production and transportation costs. The idea of modern corporation by having factory setting coordinated and specialized by management is better than the family setting production prior to factory production. The revolution in transportation by creating canals and railroads enhance the transferring and production of products and services. Through enhance the way of communicating by having telegraph system it is more efficient to communicate intercompany or intracompany. The developed credit system and improved transportation broadens the possibility of production and market options. By standardizing equipment, industrial revolution leads corporation become gigantic by increasing productivity and capability.
3. Describe scientific management. How was
scientific management different from the management techniques that came before it?
Scientific management is the approach of
developing managerial skills by using the logical reasoning of science by enhancing work, working capabilities, managerial skills, and command responsibility between the workforce and management. The difference between prior management techniques and scientific management approach is that the former focuses only on how they be productive by recognizing workers as a tool for creating products, that there is no cooperation and coordination between the workforce and management while the latter explains that there is more context outside the box, that if you treat the workforce within the principles of science there will be better changes and create more opportunities like improvement in relations and development in work-lifestyle environment.
4. Which management scholar do you find the
most influential and important, and how would you incorporate their approach into your managerial approach?
Chester Bernard’s function of the executive
and zone of indifference will be the best to hone my managerial skills. By gaining resources from members to hiring and retaining talented employees with best authority and communications from the management by giving monetary incentives and nonmonetary incentives like recognition is my ideal approach to everyone. Also, the idea of zone of indifference where you must comply first and it’s a must to understand the order even it is indifferent is one way of learning and experiencing different things. This idea also persuades that everything must be consistent with organizational goals and must not violate individual’s personal beliefs. I will incorporate this managerial approach to mine by creating an environment that even though I have the authority, I’ll not put barriers between me and my subordinates and I’ll express my sincere and honest feelings towards them and motivate in everything they do.
5. Based on the reading, defend or attack
this statement that would be stated by a direct report: Management is unethical because it is about manipulating workers.
I’ll rephrase this statement by saying,
“Management us ethical because it is about helping and guiding workers.” The state given above is too pessimistic, in a workforce where management is a pessimist there will be no great things that will come out of their work. We must be optimistic and think that communication between the management and the workforce is all about guiding and helping them to their jobs, as a manager it is a must that they will make their subordinated feel that the management is one of them. And I’ll leave a saying that says, “A optimistic manager may create a happy worker, but a pessimist manager will never create a happy worker”.