Writing

Surveillance cameras, has pros and cons. Pro 1: Public Video Surveillance
Improves Public Safety. When we install a home security camera, we gain
increased house safety. Just like that, the main benefit of surveillance cameras in
public spaces is also the increase in public safety. Public surveillance cameras
help you stay safe while clubbing, shopping, and traveling. Since public safety is
guaranteed, people's fear of crime can also be reduced, while their sense of
security is created. To ensure students' safety, administrators of Broward County
School have announced that they will introduce AI-powered facial recognition
security systems to the campuses after the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High
School shooting in 2018 that led to the death of 17 students and staff.
Pro 2. Public Surveillance Cameras Reduce Crime Rate
Video surveillance statistics show that camera surveillance does reduce crime –
after security cameras were put in public, crime incidents in Humboldt Park
dropped 20%.
If an individual knows that there are live surveillance cameras in a certain area,
they may be less willing to commit a crime near the location for the fear of being
caught.
Pro 3. Public Video Surveillance Helps Catch Criminals
If a crime is committed in an area where a public surveillance camera has been set
up, the chances of catching the criminal are much higher.
Facial recognition software has improved greatly over the years. So, if criminals
are captured by security cameras in public places, the local authority is able to
recognize and catch them easier with facial recognition technology.
Cons of Security Cameras in Public Places
While there are advantages ofthere are disadvantages.
What's wrong with public video surveillance? Here are some bad points of public
cameras.
Con 1. Surveillance Systems Are Easily Abused
A con of surveillance cameras in public places is that these security cameras may
be abused. One example of how a public camera may be misused is that
information gathered by law enforcement can be used as a form of blackmail.
Overall, the simple lack of control or limits on public camera use is one of the
biggest problems. Until now, there is no a good check-and-balance system, in
order to prevent abuses from occurring.
Con 2. Effectiveness of a Public Security Camera Is Doubted
Another controversy of the use of surveillance cameras in public places is that its
effectiveness has not been proven.
Con 3. Public Camera Surveillance Is Expensive
One of the arguments against the widespread use of public surveillance cameras is
that it costs big money. Since it is not effective enough to deter crimes and theft,
why would we spend too much money in it, which not only fails to make us safer
but also violates our personal rights?