Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corporate Veil & Governance-1
Corporate Veil & Governance-1
&
GOVERNANCE
The famous song from the movie, Shikar is the refrain of the promoters,
whereas the common investing public would much rather sing “Parda
Uthe Salaam Ho Jaaye” The courts have had to strike a fine balance
between the two.
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
The House of Lords in Salomon v Salomon1 affirmed the legal principle that,
upon incorporation, a company is generally considered to be a new legal
entity separate from its shareholders. The court did this in relation to what was
essentially a one person company. Windeyer J, in the High Court in Peate v
Federal Commissioner of Taxation, stated that a company represents:
“new legal entity, a person in the eye of the law. Perhaps it were better in
some cases to say a legal persona, for the Latin word in one of its senses
means a mask: Eriptur persona, manet res.”
Salomon v Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22
The separate legal entity principle has continued unexpurgated corporate law
for more than one hundred years. When a company acts it does so in its own
right and not just as an alias for its controllers. Similarly, shareholders are not
liable for the company’s debts beyond their initial capital investment, and have
no proprietary interest in the property of the company.
At the same time, courts have acknowledged that the corporate veil of a
company may be pierced to deny shareholders the protection that limited liability
normally provides. “Piercing the corporate veil” refers to the judicially imposed
exception to the separate legal entity principle, whereby courts disregard the
separateness of the corporation and hold a shareholder responsible for the actions
of the corporation as if it were the actions of the shareholder. A court may also pierce
the corporate veil where requested to do so by the company itself or shareholders in
the company, in order to afford a remedy that would otherwise be denied, create an
enforceable right, or lessen a penalty.
When courts pierce the corporate veil, they can remove the protection of
limited liability otherwise granted to shareholders. It is therefore relevant to
review the reasons why companies are granted limited liability.
Thirdly, limited liability assists the efficient operation of the securities markets
because the prices at which shares trade does not depend upon an
evaluation of the wealth of individual shareholders.
The paper of which above is the first part draws upon legal expertise of a