ITEM NO.

1
ª COURT NO.11 SECTION X
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 132/2015
PRIYA PILLAI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Respondent(s)
(with appln. (s) for intervention and permission to appear and
argue in person and permission to place addl. documents on record
and stay and office report)
Date : 09/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
For Petitioner(s) Ms. Karuna Nandy,Adv.
Ms. Liz Mathew,Adv.
Mr. M.F. Philip,Adv.
Ms. Aanchal Tikmani,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta,ASG
Mr. Rajiv Nandu,Adv.
Mr. B. Raghunath,Adv.
Mr. B.K. Prasad,Adv.
Mr. Rajat Nair,Adv.
Mr. Raghunath,Adv.
Dr. Subramanian Swamy, In-person
Mr. Mahesh Agarwal,Adv.
Ms. Neeha Nagpal,Adv.
Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv.
Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv.
Intervenor-in-person
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Heard.
In view of the judgment of this Court in Subramanian Swamy
v. Union of India - (2016) 7 SCC 221, we are not inclined to go
into the validity of provisions of Sections 499 and 500 of the
I.P.C. again. However, it is open to the parties to take
appropriate remedies at appropriate forum in accordance with
law.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA)
COURT MASTER COURT MASTER