Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/288182456
CITATIONS READS
0 4,882
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
EVALUATION OF COMPOST AND COMPOST EXTRACT EFFICIENCY AS BIO-CONTROL AGENTS ON DAMPING-OFF DISEASE INCIDENCE OF FENUGREEK View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Ali Salama Ali Salama on 26 December 2015.
BY
Approval Sheet
BY
approved by:
ABSTRACT
This work was carried out in the laboratory and greenhouse
of Agric. Microbiology Dept. at the Faculty of Agriculture,
Zagazig University, Egypt, in order to isolate and select efficient
indigenous strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. vicieae,
Azospirillium spp. and Azotobacter spp. which isolated from
different locations in Sharkia governorate to use them as bio-
fertilizers for broad bean (Vicia faba L.) and wheat (Triticum
aestivum L.) plants. Thirty two Rhizobium isolates were selected
as effective strains for nodulation on broad bean, 18 isolates of
Azospirillum, and 14 isolates of Azotobacter were efficient in
nitrogenase activity in liquid cultures. Five isolates showing high
values in nitrogen fixation of R. leguminosarum bv. vicieae and
the highest five effective isolates of each of Azotobacter spp. and
Azospirillum spp. were used for GA3, IAA and IBA production
in liquid cultures. The selected bio-fertilizers were examined on
the effect on growth and productivity of broad bean and wheat
plants which cultivated in both sandy and clay soils under
different levels of inorganic and organic N fertilizers in six
greenhouse experiments. The results showed that the isolate
RZ11 was the highest efficient isolate of R. leguminosarum bv.
vicieae in plant growth, nodulation, nitrogenase activity and
production of growth promoting substances. In addition the
isolate ZH21 of Azotobacter spp. and isolate ASH21 of
Azospirillum spp. reflected the highest activity of nitrogenase
enzyme and production of growth promoting substances in liquid
cultures. The inoculation of broad bean and wheat plants grown
on both sandy and clay soils with the selected bio-fertilizers
(R. leguminosarum bv. vicieae, Azotobacter spp and
zospirillum spp) is importance to obtain the best performance in
growth, yield and total nitrogen and mineral contents.
4
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work has been carried out under the supervision and
direction of Prof. Dr. Samir H. Salem Prof. of Microbiology,
Agric. Microbiology. Dept. Fac. Agric., Zagazig University. To
him I express my deepest gratitude for suggesting this problem,
valuable assistance, progressive criticism, keeping interest and
guidance.
I also wish to express my thanks and gratitude to Prof. Dr.
Fatma I. El-Zamik Prof. and head of Agric. Microbiology
Department, Fac. Agric., Zagazig University for her supervision,
unlimited help and effort during the preparation of this
manuscript.
Thanks are also due to Dr. Howaida M. L. Abd El-Basit
Assistant Prof. of Microbiology,in the same Department for
supervising this work and here valuable advise and guidance
Gratitude are also due to all the staff members and
colleagues in Agric. Microbiology. Dept. Fac. Agric., Zagazig
University for their encouragement and providing facilities
throughout this work.
5
CONTENTS
Title of contents Page
I-INTRODUCTION 1
II-REVIEW OF LITERATURE 4
III- MATERIALS AND METHODS 43
IV-RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 71
4.1. Testing the efficiency of different isolates of
Rhizobium, Azotobacter and Azospirillum..............................................
71
4.1.1. Testing the efficiency of Rhizobium isolates .........................................
71
4.1.1.1. Nodulation 72
4.1.1.2. Nitrogenase activity 73
4.1.1.3. Plant dry weight 74
4.1.1.4. Nitrogen content 75
4.1.1.5. The phage reaction of Rhizobium isolates .............................................
78
4.1.2. Testing the efficiency of N2-fixation by
Azotobacter and Azospirillum isolates in liquid
culture 79
4.1.3. Determination of growth promoting substances in
liquid cultures of Rhizobium, Azotobacter and
Azospirillum isolates 82
4.1.3.1. GA3, IAA and IBA in Rhizobium isolates .............................................
82
4.1.3.2. GA3, IAA and IBA in Azotobacter isolates ..............................................
83
4.1.3.3. GA3, IAA and IBA in Azaspirillium isolates ........................................
83
4.2. Response of broad bean plants to bio-fertilizers and
inorganic N-fertilizers under cultivation in sandy
and clay soils 86
4.3. Response of broad bean plants to bio and organic
fertilizers under cultivation in sandy and clay soil ....................................
109
6
LIST OF TABLES
Table
No. Title of Tables page
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig.
No. Title of Figure page
I. INTRODUCTION
The intensive agricultural farming system as practical in
Egypt, where the crop rotation consists of 2 or 3 crops per year,
are main reasons for the high consumption of chemical
fertilizers. Intensive methods of farming and food production are
having unfavorable consequences on the quality of food,
environment and on animal and human health. In these systems,
agriculture is treated like other industries, with an emphasis on
efficiency and maximum productivity regardless of their impacts
on human health and ecology. The amount of nitrogen applied to
the soil in intensive agricultural systems varies considerably,
depending upon the crop being grown, the soil type, and the
previous cropping history of the soil. Nowadays, the harmful
effects on the environment of heavy use of N fertilizers are
becoming more evident. Furthermore, the fossil fuels which are
used in the production of N fertilizers are becoming scarcer and
more expensive. Therefore, there is a great need to search for all
possible avenues to improve biological nitrogen fixation and its
use by farmers through bio-fertilization process (Hussien et al.,
1997).
Nitrogen fixation by the legume-Rhizobium symbiotic
partnership represents an inexpensive alternative to the use of
chemical nitrogen fertilizers in the production of food protein
and oil. The process requires that the host crop be adequately
nodulated by Rhizobium bacteria effective in nitrogen fixation.
Inoculation of legumes with suitable rhizobial strains is carrying
out in many countries to ensure nodulation (Brock et al. 2003).
16
nodules, roots and stems of old lucerne plants and also in the soil
surrounding the roots but not a distance for than about 35 cm
(Golebiowska et al., 1971).
Golebiowska et al., (1976) suggested that rhizobial phages
are present in the rhizosphere of legumes and are absent in
non-rhizosphere soils. In addition, Evans et al., (1979) stated
that the presence of a virulent bacteriophage in root zone of
clover growing in seedling agar under controlled environments
produced changes in the persistence and symbiotic effectiveness
of a susceptible strain of R. trifolii.
On surveying rhizobiophage distribution, a wide range of
phage types have been recognized from over 80% of the sites
examined (Kowalski et al., 1974 and Patel and Graig, 1984).
Also, they reported that bacteriophages of rhizobia occur
commonly in the rhizosphere of legumes and are often
associated with susceptible strains.
Also, in Egypt, rhizobiophages were found to be common
in the Nile valley soils cultivated with leguminous plants
(Emam et al., 1983; Othman, 1986; El-Didamony, 1990 and
Salama, 1992). Six phages were isolated by Emam et al., (1983)
from the rhizosphere of different legumes. These phages formed
morphologically different plaques and showed a relatively wide
host range. The tested Rhizobium strains were not lysogenic
when they were tested with mitomycin C.
Studying the distribution of 19 phages within the soil
samples taken from nine sites of pasture soils, Patel et al.,
(1985) found that phage ØWC 211 lysed the rhizobia strains
isolated from 11 sites, two sites (4, 8) only were free from 0W3
39
pea after pigeon pea, phages were also found in nodule exudates
and maximum titer was 3.2 x 10 particles / g nodules mass.
Shahaby et al. (1999) studied the incidence and survival of
rhizobiophages in bacterial carriers and liquid culture media
under stress conditions as well as response of some legumes to
inoculation with rhizobial phage-resistant isolates. The response
of four legumes to inoculation with phage- resistant rhizobial
isolates and their homologous strains was also evaluated. The
phages were detected and isolated from both fine peat and Irish
peat carriers but not from vermiculite after enrichment with
YEM broth medium. The number of phages ranged from 9 to
18 and from 12 to 25 PFU/g carriers for fine peat and Irish peat,
respectively. When the three carriers were inoculated with
rhizobial strains, the Irish peat showed higher values of phage
plaques than fine peat, while the vermiculite carrier exhibited no
plaques. The numbers ranged from 1.8X102 to 4.6X102 and
1.6X102 to 2.8X102 PFU/g carrier for Irish peat and fine peat,
respectively. The isolated phages specific for rhizobial strains
showed no lysis for phage-resistant rhizobial isolates. Rhizobium
leguminosarum bv. trifolii isolates (ARC 102 and TAL 112) and
R. leguminosarum bv. vicieae isolates (ARC 207F and ICARDA
441) did not differ in appearance and showed no variations in
their colony morphology as compared to their parent strains,
while others were different. All tested phages were highly
sensitive to high temperatures.
Sharma et al., (2001) tested the diversity among
rhizobiophages from rhizospheres of legumes inhabiting three
ecogeographical regions of India. Diversity among phage
42
Aniones
HCo3- 0.31 0.48
-
Cl 0.43 1.28
So4-- 0.61 1.52
Co3-- Traces Traces
K2SO4 87.00
MnSO4 0.338
4 H3BO3 0.247
ZnSO4.7H2O 0.288
CuSO4.5H2O 0.10
CoSO4.7H2O 0.056
Na2MoO2.2H2O 0.048
For each 10 liters of full strength culture solutions, 5 ml
each of solution 1-4 were taken then added to 5 liter of water,
then diluted to 10 liters. NaOH (1.0 N) was used to adjust the pH
to 6.6 – 6.8.
3.11.5. Nutrient agar (Difco, 1985)
Beaf extract 3.0 g
Peptone 5.0 g
Agar-agar 15.0 g
Tap water 1000 ml
pH 7.00
3.11.6. Semi solid malate medium (Döbereiner et al., 1976)
Malic acid 5g
NaCl 0.1 g
K2HPO4 0.1 g
KH2PO4 0.4 g
FeCl3.6H2O 0.01 g
MgSO4.7H2O 0.2 g
CaCl2.2H2O 0.02 g
Na2MoO2.2H2O 0.002 g
Bromothymol blue (0.05 % in ethanol) 2.0 ml
82
KOH 4.0 g
Agar-agar 1.75 g
Distilled water 1000 ml
pH 7
3.11.7. N-free semi solid malate medium (NFb medium)
(Baldani and Döbereiner, 1980)
Malic acid 5g
K2HPO4 0.5 g
MgSO4.7H2O 0.2 g
NaCl 0.1 g
CaCl2 20 mg
KOH 4.0 g
Bromothymol blue (0.05 % in ethanol) 2.0 ml
Trace elements 2 ml
Vitamin solutions 1 ml
Fe.EDTA 4 ml
Agar 1.75 g
Distilled water 1000 ml
pH 6.8
The trace-element solution containing:
Na2MoO2.2H2O 200 mg
MnSO4.H2O 235 mg
H3BO3 280 mg
ZnSO4.7H2O 24 mg
CuSO4.5H2O 8 mg
Distilled water 200 ml
83
4.1.1.1. Nodulation
Data in Table 3 indicat that inoculation of broad bean
seedlings with different 32 isolates of R. leguminosarum bv.
vicieae resulted in formation of root-nodules with different
numbers depending on the efficiency of rhizobial- isolates. The
mean number of nodules per plant after 7 weeks from cultivation
ranged between 10.3 (in case of inoculation with isolate RH21)
and 126.7 (in case of isolate RZ33), while the uninoculated
control treatment did not form nodules because of the use of
autoclaved soil.
In addition, isolates RZ32, RK13, RZ23 and RZ22 of
R. leguminosarum bv. vicieae had the highest nodules dry weight
per plant, being 163.33, 150.0, 143.3 and 140.0 mg / plant,
respectively.
4.1.1.2. Nitrogenase activity
The specific nitrogenase activity of broad bean root
nodules, measured as μ mole C2H4/h/g nodules dry weight,
as affected by inoculation with different isolates of
R. leguminosarum bv. vicieae is also shown in Table 3.
Nitrogenase activity ranged between 7.206 (for isolate RZ11)
and 0.564 (for isolate RK11) μ mole C2H4/h/g nodules dry
weight. The results show that shoot nitrogen content of broad
bean plants was highly correlated with nitrogenase activity and
nodule mass in most of inoculated treatments.
These results are in agreement with those reported by
Salem et al. (1981), Narendra et al., (1996) and Hussein et al.
87
Table (3): Shoot and root dry weight (g/plant), total nitrogen
content, nitrogenase activity and phage interaction
in nodulation test of broad bean plants, as affected
by inoculation with different isolates of rhizobia
Mean
Mean dry Nitrogenase Mean Mean
Mean no. of shoot Mean root Phage
weight of activity root dry shoot N
Isolates nodules dry N content inter-
nodule µ mol/h/g weight content
/plant weight (mg/plant) action
(mg/plant) dry nodule (g/plant) (mg/plant)
(g/plant)
control 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.58 0.19 12.41 2.28 0
RR11 43.30 86.66 2.945 1.43 0.60 55.63 12.30 VI
RR13 36.70 103.33 2.917 1.04 0.28 34.32 5.12 VI
RR23 116.70 110.00 2.590 1.49 0.34 53.49 6.22 V
RR31 47.00 116.66 1.892 0.84 0.33 31.50 6.37 II
RF12 45.00 123.33 1.509 1.32 0.33 45.14 5.78 VI
RF13 36.00 123.33 3.955 1.36 0.45 55.62 10.44 VI
RF21 57.70 73.33 6.015 1.55 0.34 64.64 9.28 V
RF23 64.00 100.00 3.605 1.19 0.34 44.15 7.31 III
RF31 66.00 26.67 3.846 1.24 0.33 47.00 6.93 IV
RF32 83.30 16.66 3.225 1.04 0.34 40.77 6.63 VI
RH13 87.70 123.33 2.410 1.21 0.44 41.38 8.58 V
RH21 10.30 50.00 2.465 0.97 0.41 35.60 7.18 IV
RH31 92.00 93.33 3.833 0.95 0.27 36.67 5.94 V
RA21 25.70 116.66 2.494 0.93 0.28 31.81 5.40 V
RA33 35.00 130.00 1.219 1.28 0.53 43.26 8.90 VI
RZ11 46.70 90.00 7.206 1.65 0.46 69.96 12.56 IV
RZ21 48.70 126.67 1.707 1.25 0.55 41.75 9.63 VI
RZ22 56.70 140.00 5.008 1.47 0.49 61.30 11.27 IV
RZ23 69.30 143.33 1.273 1.37 0.56 44.25 9.46 IV
RZ32 43.00 163.33 0.766 0.68 0.21 19.86 3.34 V
RZ33 126.70 126.66 3.923 0.87 0.38 35.58 8.47 IV
RK11 71.70 73.33 0.564 0.86 0.20 23.74 3.06 VI
RK12 49.00 70.00 4.532 1.31 0.43 53.58 9.59 VI
RK13 42.30 150.00 1.563 0.96 0.32 35.23 5.60 IV
RK21 89.70 123.33 1.355 1.35 0.34 44.55 5.88 V
RK23 101.70 116.66 1.273 1.02 0.33 32.33 5.31 IV
RK31 41.70 30.00 1.760 0.98 0.24 33.52 4.39 IV
RK32 56.70 83.33 2.365 1.10 0.37 40.37 6.22 V
RS3 61.00 46.66 2.779 1.12 0.30 43.90 5.58 IV
RB1 66.00 113.33 1.043 1.19 0.42 44.74 8.06 IV
RB2 50.00 70.00 4.331 1.37 0.34 57.13 7.89 III
RB3 43.30 76.66 3.978 1.29 0.33 51.21 6.77 0
88
Chemical analysis
locations physical analysis Mechanical analysis
cations anions
1 7.86 2.67 2.43 33.22 13.91 52.89 Clay 0.55 0.60 1.65 0.07 0.28 0.81 1.70
Zagazig (Z) 2 7.45 0.93 2.79 43.55 13.10 43.31 Clay 0.33 0.31 0.45 0.03 0.41 0.32 0.07
3 8.09 1.45 2.50 35.0 30.2 43.7 Clay 0.19 0.45 1.31 0.3 0.54 0.42 0.68
Clay loam
1 7.51 4.3 1.68 25.5 40.1 34.2 5.7 6.9 15.9 .31 3.6 13.4 11.7
Sandy
Fakous (F) 2 7.50 5.6 0.87 55.1 25.5 19.6 10.3 12.8 31.7 .32 3.0 29.8 22.8
loam
3 8.00 6.4 1.82 38.8 5.6 55.6 10.7 11.5 43.5 .54 3.0 32.6 30.6
Clay
1 7.75 4.8 1.22 58.0 8.1 33.8 S.clay loam 6.8 6.8 34.8 0.4 3.6 8.6 3.9
Abo-Kibeer
2 7.95 1.2 1.59 35.0 30.2 34.7 Clay loam 7.1 5.5 3.5 0.5 4.1 41.3 51.7
(K)
3 8.01 8.8 1.52 70.8 7.6 21.6 S.clay loam 11.4 13.8 71.7 0.36 3.1 8.0 3.2
1 7.85 1.5 2.08 18.22 7.8 74.00 Clay 5.7 2.7 4.4 0.36 3.1 8.0 3.2
El-Hessenia
2 7.85 9.4 1.89 9.58 10.33 80.09 Clay 27.81 26.2 60.9 0.08 2.5 43.2 65.0
(H)
3 7.95 19.7 1.98 34.32 12.97 52.82 Clay 40.0 27.8 119.6 0.5 2.7 132.4 52.8
9.08
1 8.20 1.95 36.0 20.1 43.8 Clay 26.2 23.2 60.9 0.08 2.5 4.32 12.1
Kafr-Sakr 17.2
2 7.55 1.22 40.1 35.2 24.7 Loam 51.5 24.0 7.5 3.2 3.6 9.6 75.7
(R) 0
3 7.60 2.13 38.8 7.7 53.5 Clay 29.9 37.8 163.0 1.3 3.5 148.8 79.6
32.8
Abo- 1 7.75 4.8 1.8 32.2 27.6 39.6 Clay loam 6.8 6.3 34.8 0.41 3.4 28.4 16.2
Hammad 2 7.5 2.8 1.33 35.0 31.6 33.3 Clay loam 14.8 3.3 3.01 1.9 2.2 8.1 4.2
(A) 3 8.1 8.8 1.96 15.4 24.2 60.1 Clay 11.4 13.8 71.7 0.50 4.1 41.3 51.7
Sandy
Belbase (B) 1 7.1 7.0 1.22 87.2 1.6 11.2 26.2 22.1 34.8 0.46 2.4 38.4 42.7
loam
Salhia (S)
1 7.75 4.2 1.33 89.0 5.7 5.1 Sandy 27.1 15.3 20.1 0.31 2.3 43.3 18.1
th
92
ASF32 (1.07 μg/ 100 m1), while the lowest content was obtained
by isolate ASF 11 (0.15 μg/ 100 m1).
Table (6): GA3, IAA and IBA in liquid culture of Rhizobium
leguminosarum bv. vicieae, Azotobacter and
Azospirillum isolates
Isolates GA3 (μg/100ml) IAA (μg/100ml) IBA (μg/100ml)
Rhizobium isolates
Azotobacter isolates
Azospirillum isolates
15
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatments
80 Sandy
70
Nodule dry weight
60 Clay
(mg/plant)
50
40
30
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatm ents
1.5
0.5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatm ents
0.6 Sandy
0.5
Root dry weight
Clay
(g/plant)
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatm ents
3 Sandy
Whole plant dry weight (g/plant)
2.5 Clay
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatm ents
soils. The results showed that shoot dry weight generally ranged
from 1.13 to 2.25 g/plant. The lowest value of shoot dry weight
was obtained by uninoculated treatment (control) in both sandy
and clay soils, being 1.30 and 1.13 g/plant, respectively. The
highest value of shoot dry weight was obtained by treatment
receiving 1/2 N dose + inoculated with RZ11 in sandy soil and
treatment receiving 1/2 N dose + inoculated with
tri-mixture inoculants of RZ11, ZH21 and ASH21in clay soil,
being 2.25 and 2.00 g/plant, respectively. The differences
between soil textures were significant (P ≤ 0.05), while the
differences among treatments and the interaction between soil
textures and treatments were not significant.
In addition, the root dry weight (g/plant) ranged from 0.22
to 0.55 g/plant. The differences among treatments were highly
significant (P ≤ 0.01). While, the differences between soil
textures and the interaction between soil textures and fertilization
treatments were not significant. The highest average root dry
weight (0.49 g/plant) was recorded for plants treated with 1/2 N
dose + inoculated with tri-mixture inoculants of RZ11 + RZ21
and ASH21 as compared with the averages of all other
treatments of both sandy and clay soils.
Regarding the effect of bio-fertilization and inorganic
N-fertilizers on the whole plant dry weight, it generally, ranged
between 1.35 and 2.68 g/plant. The differences among
fertilization treatments and between soil textures were significant
(P ≤ 0.05). However, the interaction between soil textures and
treatments was not significant. The lowest dry weight of the
whole plant was obtained in case of the control treatment in both
108
sandy and clay soils, being 1.54 and 1.35 g/plant, respectively.
The highest value of whole plant dry weight was obtained by the
treatment receiving 1/2 N dose + inoculation with isolate RZ11
in sandy soil and treatment receiving 1/2 N dose + inoculation
with tri-mixture inoculants of RZ11 + ZH21 and ASH21 in clay
soil, showing 2.68 and 2.50 g/plant, respectively. It is clear that,
whole plant dry weight of broad bean plants grown on sandy soil
was higher than those grown on clay soil, reflecting average
values of 2.37 and 2.04 g/plant, respectively.
The obtained date are in agreement with those reported by
Hassan et al., (1990), El-Ghandour and Galal (1997),
Namdeo and Gupta (1999) and Anyeabeba et al. (2001). The
latter revealed that inoculation of broad bean plants with bio-
fertilizers and applied inorganic N-fertilizer gave the best results
with regard to shoots, roots and whole plant dry weights.
In addition, El-Ghandour et al. (2001) studied the effect of
Rhizobium inocultion and mineral nitrogen for growth,
N2-fixation and yield of broad bean. They found that the
application of inoculants showed remarkable increase in dry
matter of shoot and grain yield as well as the N-uptake by both
components.
These data concluded that inoculation with tri-mixture
inoculants of RZ11, ZH21 and ASH21 plus the application of
1/2 N-inorganic gave the highest value with regard to shoots,
roots and whole plant dry weights of broad bean plants cultivated
in sandy and clay soils.
109
40
20
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatm ents
14 Sandy
12
Clay
Total N/root
(mg/plant)
10
8
6
4
2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatm ents
120 Sandy
100 Clay
Total N/plant
(mg/plant)
80
60
40
20
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatm ents
12
(mg/plant)
10
8
6
4
2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatm ents
1.4 Sandy
1.2
Clay
Total P/root
(mg/plant)
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatm ents
16 Sandy
14
Clay
Total P/plant
12
(mg/plant)
10
8
6
4
2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatm ents
60
40
20
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatm ents
16 Sandy
Total K/root (mg/plant)
14
Clay
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatments
120 Sandy
100 Clay
Total K/plant
(mg/plant)
80
60
40
20
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatm ents
Fertilization treatments Sandy Clay Av. Sandy Clay Av. Sandy Clay Av.
Control 37.25 49.15 43.20 3.18 3.20 3.19 19.83 19.97 19.90
*
Inoculation by RZ11 57.20 74.10 65.65 3.57 3.82 3.69 22.28 23.81 23.05
Recommended nitrogen dose 55.25 58.65 56.95 3.59 3.47 3.53 22.44 22.56 22.50
N + RZ11* 59.20 65.45 62.33 3.65 3.65 3.65 22.81 22.79 22.80
1/4 N + RZ11* 49.10 66.40 57.75 3.55 3.57 3.56 22.15 22.30 22.23
1/2 N + RZ11* 58.00 75.70 66.85 3.80 3.73 3.77 23.75 23.32 23.53
3/4 N + RZ11* 54.00 73.15 63.58 3.71 3.76 3.73 23.19 23.52 23.35
1/2 N+ RZ11+ZH21+ASH21 ** 59.20 74.05 66.63 3.81 3.81 3.81 23.78 23.79 23.79
Soil texture av. 53.65 67.08 3.61 3.63 22.53 22.76
LSD for Soil texture Fertilization S×F Soil texture Fertilization S×F Soil texture Fertilization S×F
4 Sandy
3.5
Nitrogen (%) in
3 Clay
2.5
seeds
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatm ents
25 Sandy
20 Clay
Protein (%) in
seeds
15
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Treatm ents
soil, being 68.05 and 52.35 g/100 seeds for the first and second
soil, respectively. The differences between soil textures were
highly significant (p ≤ 0.01).
In addition, data in Table 18 and Fig 13 show also that
inoculation of broad bean plants with R. leguminosarum bv.
vicieae (RZ11) combined with compost gave the highest
nitrogen (%) and protein (%) in seeds of broad bean plants
grown on both soils. The values were 3.84 and 3.91 % N and
23.94 and 24.43 % protein in seeds of broad bean plants grown
on both sandy and clay soils, respectively. The statistical
differences in nitrogen (%) and protein (%) among fertilization
treatments and between soil textures were highly significant
(p ≤ 0.01). Abd EL-Ghany (1996) showed o that, the 100 seeds
weight/plant of soyabean and number of pods/plant were
positively influenced by seed inoculation with Azotobacter
chroococcum, Azospirillum lipoferum and its mixtures (1:1) as
compared with uninoculated treatments. Also, Sarwar et al.
(1998) demonstrated that, the percentage of increase in yield due
to the inoculation with specific Bradyrhizobium ranged from
15-30% in cowpea to 75:200 % in soybean.
These results emphasize the importance of bio-fertilizers
inoculation of broad bean plants either growing in sandy or clay
soils with bio-fertilizers to obtain the highest biomass yield and
nitrogen percentage in seeds.
4.4. Response of broad bean plants to bio-fertilizers
under cultivation in sandy and clay soils
A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the response of
broad bean plants (Giza 843) grown on sandy and clay soils to
146
than those obtained from wheat plants grown on clay soil, being
29.52 and 41.62 g/1000grains, respectively. In addition, there
were highly significant differences (P≤0.01) among fertilization
treatments, soil textures and interaction between soil textures and
fertilization treatments in nitrogen (%) and protein (%) of wheat
plants grown on both sandy and clay soils. The highest value was
obtained by the treatment received 1/2 N + inoculation with
tri-mixture inoculants of ASH21, AH21 and RZ11 in sandy soil
being, 2.19 N% and 12.60% protein in grains. However, in clay
soil treatment received N-dose without bio-fertilization and
treatment received 3/4 N dose + inoculation with ASH21 only
gave also highest figures namely 2.15 and 2.14 % N and
12.36 and 12.33 % protein in grains, respectively. The
uninoculated treatment (Control) in sandy soil did not form any
grains in plant.
The obtained data are in agreement with those reported by
El-Demerdash et al., (1993), Galal and Elgandour (1994) and
Galal and Thabet (2002). They revealed that the inoculation
with bio-fertilizers and biomass applied inorganic N-fertilizers of
wheat plants gave the best results with regard to yield and
N uptake in shoot and grains of wheat plants.
Inoculation with associative N2-fixers particularly
Azotobacter and Azospirillum have a great importance to
improve growth and increase yield of cereal crops as well as the
mineral contents of shoot, root and whole plants not only due to
high N2-fixation activity, but also the ability of these bacteria to
produce antibiotics, growth-promoting substances (phytohormones),
siderophores and the ability to solubilize phosphate (Pandey and
Kumar, 1989)
196
sandy and clay soils. The results show that the total phosphorus
content in shoot, root and whole plant of wheat plants were
significantly increased by the application of bio-fertilization as
compared to the uninoculated treatment (control). The highest
values of total phosphorus content namely 3.51, 0.36 and
3.87 mg P/plant in shoot, root and whole plant, respectively,
were obtained by the treatment inoculated with tri-mixture
inoculants of ASH21, ZH21 and RZ11. The lowest values of
total phosphorus content in shoot, root and whole plant of wheat
plants were obtained by uninoculated treatment (Control). In this
respect, the effect of soil texture was insignificant. On contrast,
the interaction between the two tested factors reveal that
inoculation with tri-mixture inoculants of ASH21, ZH21 and
RZ11 in sandy soil induced the highest total phosphorus content,
being 4.67 and 5.07 mg P/plant in both shoot and whole plant
respectively.
The obtained results are in agreement with those reported
by El-Bakry et al., (2001) in sorghum and Radwan et al.,
(2002) in wheat.
The results concluded that inoculation of wheat plants with
Azospirillum sp. (isolate ASH21) combined with Azotobacter sp.
(isolate ZH21) and R.Leguminosarum bv. vicieae (isolate RZ11)
significantly increased the total phosphorus content in shoot, root
and whole plant dry weight of wheat plants grown on both sandy
and clay soils.
4.9.5. Total potassium content
The effect of bio-fertilizers on total potassium content in
shoot, root and whole plant (mg/plant) in wheat plants cultivated
230