You are on page 1of 1

The allowable load on a tank nozzle is a common request; however, the procedure to arrive at an

appropriate set of loads is not always straightforward.

Firstly, the allowable nozzle loads on a tank are generally significantly different to a similar sized
pressure vessel with a nozzle of the same diameter. In summary, the 30D/40D rule rarely holds. This is
primarily due to the vastly different diameter to thickness ratio that exists in tanks. The internal pressure
of tanks should not exceed 50kPa (this is a trip point for design to pressure vessel standards) and hence
diameter to thickness ratios are generally greater than 600. This ratio is beyond the scale of most WRC
107/297 charts, which is a preliminary indicator that the result will be substantially different to pressure
vessels.

Secondly, the increased diameter to thickness ratio implies a more compliant nozzle. The result is less
resistance to piping expansion loads and hence a smaller reaction at the connection with the tank. It
follows that the piping analysis should consider the stiffness of the tank to calculate a realistic load at
the connection with the tank. Therefore, the design of the nozzle connection should ideally be an
iterative process between the tank and piping designers.

In reality, it is not always possible for the quick transfer of information between tank and piping
designers to occur. In this circumstance, the tank designer must make an estimate of the allowable
nozzle loads based on an initial nozzle geometry, generally selected according to experience. The trial
loads are selected according to the 30D/40D principle but scaled down according to the tank geometry.
The stresses in the nozzle and shell can be evaluated using finite element modelling and compared
against pressure vessel codes such as ASME Section VIII, Div 2 or AS1210. The assumption is that the
pressure vessel code provides equal, if not greater, protection against failure. Once these initial loads
have been established, the iterative process with the piping designer begins, where the nozzle geometry
is updated according to whether the allowable nozzle loads are greater than the expected loads
calculated by the piping designer.

FEC has extensive in-house experience in the evaluation of external nozzle loads on both tanks and
pressure vessels and can assist clients in either application. For simple nozzle to tank analyses, FEC
utilises Nozzlepro software to calculate stresses in the nozzle neck and shell under external loads and
the in-built checks against pressure vessel codes to efficiently evaluate the capacity of any nozzle. For
more complex tank nozzle geometries and loading, FEC utilises other finite element software such as
Abaqus and Strand7 to complete the analysis to the relevant design standard.

You might also like