Modeling movability across recognition scheme if usefulness of linear pointer counters the way caring

nbytes −occur
about or of digital vital or vivid issues (
¿ log 2 1+ )
nbytes+occur ⋅ key that is going to be rightly chosen
¿
¿
across away while transition traceability along over where probabilistic show empowers expectation
1
−1

( )
1
p
¿ ∫ log 2 1+ ∂p
show on what 0 1 charges for locate a centric approach justifies the call
+ ∫ key ( tellg ( ) )
p tellg ()
¿
¿
for active adjustment of boundary barrier limit approach can state maintaining attainability by the way
that for each accountability show, valid standardization affects would recognize proper way for
1
−1

( )
1
p
¿ ∫ log 2 1+ ∂p
exploiting digital usefulness around over away. Thus 0 1 can highlight
+ ∫ key ( tellg ( ) )
p tellg ()
¿
¿
sensitivity pressure if digital concerns have to know formal language refers to boundary barrier limit
show has to address governable terminology or approach through imaging impact:

1 p

( ( )) ( ( ))
1 −1 1 −p
p p
¿ limit ∫ log2 1+ ∂ p =limit ∫ log2 1+ ∂p
1 p can limit
0
+ ∫ key ( tellg() ) 0
+ p ⋅ ∫ key ( tellg () )
p tellg() p tellg ()

¿
¿
digital rules keeping closer influence effects to harmonize or individualize principles of integrity if
envisage key shall make pressure on job scheduling show. An example can agree with envisage
exploration of key integrity through exploitation of reading through shifting principles can assume that
Across above:: inline virtual bool RetCh(char* pch){
if( fptr && (fptr.good())){

fptr.seekg(occur, std::ios::beg);

fptr.read(pch, sizeof( T ));

occur = fptr.tellg();

if(occur == nbytes) if(fptr) fptr.close();

return( true );

}else{

fputs("not possible to run over away \n", stderr);

exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
 }
}
Next after:: inline virtual void SetKey(){
if(typeid( T ) == typeid(std::streamoff)) key = occur;

else{

char* pch = new char[sizeof(T)];

if(RetCh( pch )){

if(typeid(T) == typeid(char)) key = (char)(*pch);

else if(typeid( T ) == typeid(short)) key = atoi(pch);

else if(typeid( T ) == typeid( int )) key = atoi(pch);

else if(typeid( T ) == typeid( long )) key = atol( pch );

else if(typeid( T ) == typeid( double )) key = atol( pch );

else if(typeid( T ) == typeid( float )) key = atof( pch );

/*else if(typeid( T ) == typeid( std::ios::binary)) key ;

else if(typeid( T ) == typeid( std::string)) key;*/

else{

fputs("not possible to run away \n", stderr);

exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}else{

fputs("not possible run away \n", stderr);

exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}

if( occur == nbytes ) if(fptr) fptr.close();

}

Using driven dynamics on what transition traceability has to adjust any causality
show through kernel language of cycle based simulation that would measure the whole
required θ = 2 * pi * f * n * T0 that can adjust equivalence language on what
θ (ix +sizeof ( T ) )
sin2 − cos2
digital evaluation
¿ ∫
θ ( ix )
(
log 2 1+ )
1 −sin 2 ⋅cos 2
∂θ
that invokes principles to try
¿
¿
justification law or rule on what digital circumstantiation or
circumstance( standing or placed around; surrounding) has to explore or to refer
to. Although digital dynamics remains useful if this approach does point to a raw
 θ (ix +sizeof ( T ) )
sin2 − cos 2
material works on cycle based simulation
¿ ∫
θ (ix )
(
log 2 2+ )
1 −sin 2 ⋅cos 2
∂θ
that would
¿
¿
ensure selfish traceability belongs to inner report struggling specification
impacts
template<class T, class V> bool SetList(char* fn, std::list<AssignHold<T, V>>&
vct ){

bool ae = false;

AssignHold<T, V>* cl = new AssignHold<T, V>(fn);

vct.push_back( *cl );

delete cl;

auto it = vct.end();

do{

it = std::prev( it );

T ch = it->GetKey();

std::streamoff ix = it->GetOccur();

std::streamsize vbytes = it->GetNbytes();

auto ik = vct.begin();

do{
if( (it != ik) && (ik->operator==(ch))){

ik->InCrement(ix);

vct.pop_back();

if( ae == false ) ae = true;

break;
}

ik = std::next( ik );

}while( ik != vct.end());

ix = ix + sizeof( T );

if( ix < vbytes ){

it = std::next( it );

Ohold(ix, vct);

}else break;

}while( it != vct.end());
 return( ae );
}

In fact, cycle based simulation which has to reactivate “fresh call” for new
“fptr.tellg()” that has to advance linear pointer to mastering location where
p ⋅∫ key ()
required can be gathered. Using (
¿ log 2 1+
)
p+∫ key ( ) which can be translated to
¿
¿
reality show only uses “fptr.tellg()” or so called “ if( stream ) tell get()”
dynamics has to gather information based upon effects of sensor sensibility
probably running around larger wider domain of application experience low power
sensors that holds flavorful-ness of transition traceability. The basic inspired
occur i

( )
⋅ ∫ key ()
nbytes occur i ⋅ ∫ key ()
show:
¿ log 2 1+
occur i
nbytes
+∫ key ()
=log 2 1+
( )
occur i +nbytes ⋅ ∫ key () that is rightly settling to

¿
¿
extract principles of occurrence or appearance. Therefor linear pointer property is
based upon great effects of implementable integrity emphasizes equipped effect of
“if(stream) tell get()” seems being dominant design of learning existence threads ”
it can exist Composite being somehow in Relationship with Minus(among, basic)” that
reserves the equipped waveform compression show for eventually exploitation of
occur i ⋅∫ key ()
existence approach
¿ log 2 1+
( )
occur i + sizeof (ifstream ) ⋅∫ key () that has to present a driven
¿
¿
tactical approach closer to get rightly safer defines unique proportional
processing because for any occur iterator where the reached measurable number of
bytes ( occur = fptr.tellg() movable from nil bytes to total number of bytes = size
of( if (stream)) a battleground that adjusts principles of centric metrics approach
based upon liable linguistic logic’s show:

¿ measurable : :amount ,utility ::tools

instill ::node , infuse ::edge
custom ( event ) ::happening ,trust ( time ) ::accountability
¿
¿
Liable linguistic can through this small compact concept of centric jump shall join
transition traceability effects with active tour of wonderful compact when the

1 ∏ (1 − p ∫ key ( )
)∂ p
tellg() tellg()
amount ¿ ∫ that has to insist on hopefulness looks being good
0 1 − p ⋅ ( 1− p )
¿
¿
for implementable approach invokes principles of entirely movable pointer has to
count a number a bytes along over across that keeps tract for “at byte number x,
there is opportunity to convert gathering data into driven dynamics of encoding –
decoding that refers to original show of digital computing. While pipeline
principles which does express character show = { to fetch or pick up or select or
choose, to decode (two bytes = an integer number (for example 21 , at first byte
there is char( 2 ) and at second byte there is char( 1 )). Hence, advance
algorithms have to learn more about exploitation of linearity and non linearity
that works on exploring dynamics deals with balancing behavior shall recovery
a⋅ b⋅ ( b −a )
¿ Wavy ( p ) =
( a+b )3
principles of wavy concept a= Min ( p ,1 − p ) that deploys justification show on
b=Max ( p , 1 − p )
¿
¿
what linearity appears having to offer through basic show of digital concept would
signify that diversity in competence describes or exposes or posts how the
integrity of non linearity can master turns for cycle based simulation that works
sin 2 −cos 2
to adapt principles
¿ log 2 1+ ( )
1− sin 2 ⋅cos2 that considers itself changeable dynamics
¿
¿
looks forwards towards principles of governable terminology that has to compare
∂2 progress
∂ tim 2
¿ challenge=
original show on what clear ⋅ behavior that understands principles
illusion∓
dynamics
¿
¿
of linear pointer show along over away making causality much more convenient that
has to liberate open mind think about adjustable arrangement that would ask for
more explanation on what digital mount management has to judge in complete reality
show has to insist on an English Schooling in English can count on principles of
attainability. Linear pointer has to accept the reality stage of envisage
1+ p ⋅ ∫ key () 1+ ( 1− p ) ⋅ ∫ key ()

appointment: ¿
log 2 ( 1− p ) (
⋅log 2
p ) that can insist on major main
p 1− p
1+16 ⋅ ( 1+cos 2 ) ⋅ e 1 − p ∨e p

¿
¿
principles of liable linguist logic’s admits that signal complexity does cover
originality of transition traceability in average show shall endorse or advocate
standards for absolute assignment of composite. Let assume that scalability policy
appears very closer to be thinkable basics does set diversity from proposal of
political typifying or diversity that has to separate into sliding slices refers to
vital (energetic soul engines) commits of “post law”. As know why shall any ruling
law be divided in sliding slices would reach a number of thirty ( well- or well be
belongs to enhancement team, a team has to recognize all certain of posting super-
well done show through inertial focus on what is deliverable. Because enhancement
or improvement or amelioration has to be involved within any scientific hopes which
itself has to endorse or advocate jump or measurement show all about to present
methodology pf measuring charges of advances and of traditionalism along over any
ruling law. But although excitement of meaningfulness or designation of driven
definition has to stand for itself to review all justification on what a super well
or advances of basic requirement has to report around over away. Although
enlargement or a dragging show on what a wide spread approach struggles between
recognition show of basic elements define the bright clear concept of existence.
These basic elements integrate themselves to express original dynamics unifies
principles of measurable approaches … an other entity or kindness or typifying
refers involvement of all design of scalability policy is the categorization show
that has to impose worthy wealthy open door show shall fight for itself through
learning of causality and more a lot on what a real world has to explore (through
adaptive virtuality shall construct scratch scheduling for human integrity).

A
⋅ y ( scalability )
vector ( x ) a
¿e = , n=countable=0 , 1 ,2 , ..., N
Max ()
− y ( scalability ) +
2n
¿
¿
The scalability policy has to run more a lot indexes for offering best orientation
of political policy has to present super-translation of human comportment and
behavior around across adjustable arrangement that has to responds to what human
willing has to ask for or request around over away :: a b c wanna want to be a b c
it is turn for reminder around … a b c it can suggest to deal with wishes and
dreams … a b c it honestly concern for better lifer covering smiles and more … a b
c it can be run on what super well has to offer forth while money has to produce
for better show of tranquility and standing behind around …

Appendix
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <ios>
#include <iosfwd>
#include <iomanip>
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstddef>
#include <cstdint>
#include <cstdarg>
#include <cstring>
#include <fstream>
#include <cmath>
#include <list>
#include <queue>
#include <typeinfo>
#include <algorithm>

#define pi 22/7

#define T0 1/4

#define Min(x, y) (x <= y) ? x : y

#define Max(x, y) (x >= y) ? x : y

#define con( p ) ((p >= 0) && (p <= 1)) ? Max(p, 1 - p) + Min(p, 1 - p) : 1

#define diff( p ) ((p >= 0) && (p <= 1)) ? Max(p, 1 - p) - Min(p, 1 - p) : 0

#define round( p ) ((p >= 0) && (p <= 1)) ? Max(p, 1 - p) * Min(p, 1 - p) : 0

#define eval( p ) ((p >= 0) && (p <= 1)) ? 1 - round( p ) : 1

#define periodicity( p ) ((p >= 0) && (p <= 1)) ? round( p ) * diff( p ) : 0

#define Wavy( p ) ((p >= 0) && (p <= 1)) ? periodicity( p ) / pow(con( p ), 3) : 0

#define Zing( p ) ((p >= 0) && (p <= 1)) ? periodicity( p ) / eval( p ) : 0

#define sin(p, n) ((p >= 0) && (n * p <= n)) ? sin(2 * pi * n * T0 * p) : 0

#define cos(p, n) ((p >=0) && (n * p <= n)) ? cos(2 * pi * n * T0 * p) : 1

#define qx(p, n) ((p >= 0) && (n * p <= n)) ? sin(p, n) * log2(2 + Wavy( p )) : 0

#define qy(p, n) ((p >= 0) && (n * p <= n)) ? cos(p, n) * log2(2 + Wavy( p )) : 1

#define qz(p, n) ((p >= 0) && (n * p <= n)) ? sin(p, n) * log2(2 + Zing( p )) : 0

#define qw(p, n) ((p >= 0) && (n * p <= n)) ? cos(p, n) * log2(2 + Zing( p )) : 1

#define qv(p, n) ((p >= 0) && (n * p <= n)) ? sin(p, n) * log2(2 +

periodicity( p )) : 0

#define qu(p, n) ((p >= 0) && (n * p <= n)) ? cos(p, n) * log2(2 +

periodicity( p )) : 1

#define qr(p, n) ((p >= 0) && (n * p <= n)) ? sin(p, n) * log2(1 + eval( p )) : 0

#define qs(p, n) ((p >= 0) && (n * p <= n)) ? cos(p, n) * log2(1 + round( p )) : 1

#define qo(p, n) ((p >= 0) && (n * p <= n)) ? sin(p, n) * log2(2 + diff( p )) : 0

#define qq(p, n) ((p >= 0) && (n * p <= n)) ? cos(p, n) * log2(2 + diff( p )) : 1

#define qp(p, n) ((p >= 0) && (n * p <= n)) ? sin(p, n) * log2(1 + con( p )) : 0

#define q0(p, n) ((p >= 0) && (n * p <= n)) ? cos(p, n) * log2(1 + con( p )) : 1

using namespace std;

template<class T, class V> class AssignHold{

public:

AssignHold<T, V>() : ptr() { }

AssignHold(const AssignHold<T, V>* obj) : pObj( obj ) { }

AssignHold<T, V>(char* fn){

fptr.open( fn, std::ios::in | std::ios::binary);

nbytes = sizeof( fptr );

occur = fptr.tellg();

SetKey();

SetOffset();
}

AssignHold<T, V>(std::streamoff& ix) : occur( ix ){

SetKey();
 SetOffset();
}

~AssignHold<T, V>(){

if( fptr ) fptr.close();

else if( ptr ) delete ptr;

else if( pObj ) delete pObj;

else{ }
}

inline virtual bool operator==( T& ch){

return( ch == key );
}

inline virtual bool RetCh(char* pch){

if( fptr && (fptr.good())){

fptr.seekg(occur, std::ios::beg);

fptr.read(pch, sizeof( T ));

occur = fptr.tellg();

if(occur == nbytes) if(fptr) fptr.close();

return( true );

}else{

fputs("not possible to run over away \n", stderr);

exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}

inline virtual float SetFloat(){

if(occur == nbytes){

if(fptr) fptr.close();

return( 0.000);

}else return( log2( 1 + (nbytes - occur) / (nbytes + occur *

key)));
}

inline virtual void SetKey(){

if(typeid( T ) == typeid(std::streamoff)) key = occur;

else{
 char* pch = new char[sizeof(T)];

if(RetCh( pch )){

if(typeid(T) == typeid(char)) key = (char)(*pch);

else if(typeid( T ) == typeid(short)) key =

atoi(pch);

else if(typeid( T ) == typeid( int )) key =

atoi(pch);

else if(typeid( T ) == typeid( long )) key =

atol( pch );

else if(typeid( T ) == typeid( double )) key =

atol( pch );

else if(typeid( T ) == typeid( float )) key =

atof( pch );

/*else if(typeid( T ) == typeid( std::ios::binary))

key ;

else if(typeid( T ) == typeid( std::string)) key;*/

else{

fputs("not possible to run away \n", stderr);

exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}

}else{

fputs("not possible run away \n", stderr);

exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}

if( occur == nbytes ) if(fptr) fptr.close();

}

inline virtual void SetOffset(){

if(typeid( V ) == typeid(std::streamoff)) offset.push( occur );

else if(typeid( V ) == typeid( long )) offset.push((long)occur);

else if(typeid( V ) == typeid( double ))

offset.push((double)occur);

else if(typeid( V ) == typeid( float )) offset.push( SetFloat());

else{

fputs("not possible to run away \n", stderr);

 exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}

if( occur == nbytes ) if(fptr) fptr.close();

}

inline virtual void InCrement(std::streamoff& ix){

occur = ix;

float a = SetFloat();

if( a ) {

if(typeid( V ) == typeid( float )) offset.push( a );

else SetOffset();

}else{

fputs("not possible to run away \n", stderr);

exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}

if( occur == nbytes ) if(fptr) fptr.close();

}

inline virtual T GetKey() const { return( key ); }

inline virtual std::queue<V> GetOffset() const {return( offset ); }

inline virtual std::streamoff GetOccur() const {return( occur ); }

inline virtual std::streamsize GetNbytes() const {return( nbytes ); }

inline virtual AssignHold* Getptr() const {return( ptr ); }

inline virtual AssignHold<T, V>* GetpObj() const {return( pObj ); }

inline virtual void MakeClean(){

if(fptr) fptr.close();

else if( ptr ) delete ptr;

else if( pObj ) delete pObj;

else { }
}

private:

std::ifstream fptr; // if = whether stream

std::streamoff occur; //movibility

std::streamsize nbytes; //how many

 T key; //typefying of a key

std::queue<V> offset; //address or offset

AssignHold* ptr; // to point to or to match

AssignHold<T, V>* pObj; // instantiation of operative object

};

template<class T, class V> void Ohold(std::streamoff& ix, std::list<AssignHold<T,

V>>& vct){

AssignHold<T, V>* obj = new AssignHold<T, V>( ix );

vct.push_back( *obj);

delete obj;
}

template<class T, class V> bool SetList(char* fn, std::list<AssignHold<T, V>>&

vct ){

bool ae = false;

AssignHold<T, V>* cl = new AssignHold<T, V>(fn);

vct.push_back( *cl );

delete cl;

auto it = vct.end();

do{

it = std::prev( it );

T ch = it->GetKey();

std::streamoff ix = it->GetOccur();

std::streamsize vbytes = it->GetNbytes();

auto ik = vct.begin();

do{
if( (it != ik) && (ik->operator==(ch))){

ik->InCrement(ix);

vct.pop_back();

if( ae == false ) ae = true;

break;
}
 ik = std::next( ik );

}while( ik != vct.end());

ix = ix + sizeof( T );

if( ix < vbytes ){

it = std::next( it );

Ohold(ix, vct);

}else break;

}while( it != vct.end());

return( ae );
}
int main( int argc, char** argv){

if( argc != 3){

fputs("not enough parameters \n", stderr);

exit(EXIT_FAILURE);

}else{
typedef AssignHold<short, float> cl;

std::list< cl > vect;

std::ofstream lptr;

if(SetList<short, float>(argv[1], vect) ) lptr.open(argv[2],

std::ios::out | std::ios::binary);

auto it = vect.begin();

while( it != vect.end()){

lptr << it->GetKey();

std::queue<float> vx = it->GetOffset();

while( ! vx.empty()){

lptr << vx.front();

vx.pop();
}
}

lptr.close();

return 0;
}
}