ARTIKEL WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS LK-Verlags UG LIDS) RIN tS sla “ORONA MERS The Misconception eel -re] aT esi Dr Stefan Lanka1 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin ou'zo20:Austug The Misconception called Virus Measles as an example Dr Stefan Lanka Contrary to what most people believe, there are no pathogenic viruses. The claims about the existence of viruses and Viral diseases are based on historic misin- terpretations and not, as | thought in the past - on fraud or deliberate deception. We now have new better, in the positive meaning “scientific” discoveries and ex- planations for the origin, therapy and prevention not just of “viral” diseases. The phenomenon of simultaneous or subsequent appearance of symptoms in different persons, which has been until now interpreted as contagion and was believed to be caused by the transmis- sion of pathogens, is now also easy to understand through new discoveries. Thus, we now have a new view of life (which in reality is an old view) and of the cosmological integration of biologi- cal processes. The “new”, rather re-discovered per. spective could only originate outside of the official “science”; one of the rea- sons for this is that the people involved in scientific institutions do not fulfil their first and most important scien- tific duty - to permanently doubt and double-check every theory. Otherwise, they would have already discovered that the misinterpretation had been taking place for a long time already and had become a dogma only by extremely unscientific activities in the years 1858, 1953 and 1954. The transition to a new explanation of health, disease and healing will only succeed because all the concerned therapists and scientists can save face with it. From history and the new per- spective on biology and life, we now also have explanations for the emotions, the ignorance and all kinds of human be- haviour. This is the second optimistic message. Coming out of a dead end and forgiving the errors of the past can take place even more effectively, the more one understands what happened and learns for the future. I know that for all the people directly involved, such as doctors, virologists, health care professionals, and above all for the people affected by the system, who suffer under misdiagnoses or who have even lost relatives on account of it, it may be difficult to intellectually accept the explanation of reality that | will offer in this article. In order that the germ theory doesn’t develop into a dangerous momentum, as was the case with AIDS, BSE, SARS, MERS, Corona and various other animal flu cases, or even lead to a public order breakdown, Jam politely asking all the people who are discovering just now the facts about the “non-existence” of the alleged vi ruses to discuss the topic in an objec- tive and unemotional manner.23 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS maganin ev2020. Auszug The current situation ‘Allclaims about viruses as pathogens are wrongand ae based, con easily recognisable, understandable and verifiable misin- terpretations, The real causes of diseases and phenonema which are ascribed to viruses have already been discovered and researched: this nowiedgeis now available. Al scientists who think they are working with viruses in laboratories are ac tually working wth ypeal particles of specific dying tissues oF cells which were prepared in a special wa. They believe that those tissues and cells are dying because they were infected bya virus. In teaity those prepared tissues and cells are dying ‘because they were starved and poisoned as a consequence of the experiments in the lb, Virologsts believe in viruses, because they add to the tissue and cell culture allegedly infected blood, saliva or other body fluids ~ afer having withdrawn the nutrients from the respec ‘tive cell culture and after having started poisoningit with tox- ie antibiotics. They believe that the cell culture is then killed by viruses. However, the death of the tissue and cells takes place in the exact same manner when no “infected” genetic, material is added at all The vralogists have apparently not noticed ths fact. According othe scientiflogicand the rules of scientifc conduct, control experiments should have been cated out. In order to confirm the newly discovered meth- cod of so-called “virus propagation”, in order to see whether I was not the method itself causing or falsifying the result, the scientists would have had to perform additional experiments, called negative control experiments, in which they would add sterile substances or substances from healthy people and an- imalsto the cell clture ‘These control experiments have never been carried out bythe official “science” to this day. During the measles vius trial, | commissioned an independent laboratory to perform this, control experiment and the result was that the tissues and. cells die due to the laboratory conditions in the exact same ways when they come into contact with allegedly “infected” material ‘The purpose of control experiments to exclude the posbii- ty that itis the applied method ar technique which may cause ‘the result. Control experimentsare the highest dutyin science and also the exclusive basis of claiming that one’s conclusion Is scientific. During the measles virus tral it was the legally appointed expert who stated that the papers which are cru cial forthe entire wrology contain no contol experiments. We learn fiom this thatthe respective scientists work extremely unscientifcally, without noticing it This completely unscientife approach originated in June 1954 when an unscientific and refutable speculative article wat published, according to which the death of tissue in atest tube was considered a possible evidence fr the presence of a virus. Sic months later, on 10 December 3954, the main author ofthis opinion was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine fot another equally speculative theory. The speculation from June 1934 was then raised to a scientific fact and became a dogma which has never been challenged to this date Since une 1954, ‘the death of tissue and cell in atest tube has been regarded a5 proof forthe existence ofa virus. The so-called evidence forthe existence of viruses ‘The death oftissues/clls is also regarded as the isolation of | Virus, because they claim that something from the outside, from another organism, was brought into the laboratory, although a virus has never been isolated according to the ‘meaning ofthe word isolation, and it has never been photo- sraphed and biochemically characterised as a whole unique sttucture, The electron micrographs of the alleged viruses show in reality quite normal cellular partieles from dying ts- se and cells, and most photos show onlya computer model (CGI ~ computer generated images). Because the involved parties also BELIEVE that the dying tissue and cells become viruses themselves, their death is also tegarded as propags tion ofthe virus The involved partes still believe this because the discoverer ofthis method was awarded the Nobel Prize and his papers remain the reference papers on “viruses”. More about this below Without having purified this concoction consisting of dying tissue and cells from monkeys, bovine foetuses and toxic antibiotics, this minture is being used as a “live” vaccine, because its supposed to consist of so-called “attenuated” viruses. The death of issue and cell on account of sta tion and poisoning and not because ofan alleged infection = has continuously been misinterpreted as evidence for the ‘existence of viruses, as evidence for their isolation and as evidence oftheir propagation. ‘Thus the resulting toxic miture fll foreign proteins, foreign nucleic acids (ONARNAY, cytotoxic antibiotics, microbes and spores ofall types is being labelled a “live vaccine”. It is im planted in children through vaccination mainly into the mus: cles, ina quantity which fit were injected into the veins would immediately lead to certain death. Only ignorant people who blindly ust in the state authorities who are “testing"and ap- proving the vaccines can regard vaccination asa small harm- less prick”, The verifiable facts demonstrate the danger and nedligence of these scientists and politicians, who claim that vaccines are safe, have litle or no side-effects and would pro- tect from a disease. None ofthete claims is tue and scent, ‘on the contrary: upon precise scientific analysis, one finds that vaccines are useless and the respective literature admits tothe lackofany evidence in their favour? Individual molecules are extracted from the particles of dead tissue and cells, they are misinterpreted to be parts of virus and are theoretically put together into a virus model ‘Areal and complete virus does not appeat anywhere in the ‘entire “scientific literature. The consensus-finding process for the measles “virus”, in which the participants debated in order to determine what belonged to the virus and what didn't, lasted for decades. >4 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin x/2020:Austug Diagram Contr! experiments are ising and thusithas been ignored that thee is oly a hypothetical an imaginary evidence for viruses and ro material, scientific evidence, Cutting tents Poisonous antibiotics, which kl elle ™~ The antibiotics ore supposed to exclu de that the expe: ted death of the cells is coused by The cell oe sup- posed to become “hungry” in order to more easly ab- sorb the ilaged vase, bacteria With the appatently new China Coronavirus 2019 (2019- CoV, meanwhile re-named), this consensus-finding pro- cess lasts only a few mouse clicks. With onlya few mouse clicks as well, a program can create any virus by putting together molecules of short parts of nucleic acids from dead tissue and cells with a determined biochemi= «al composition, thus arranging them as desired into a longer genotype whichis then declared tobe the complete genome ofthe new virus. In realty not even this manipulation, called “alignment”, can resltin the “complete” gen virus which could then be called its genome. fe material of In this process of theoretical construction ofthe “viral DNA”, thore requences that don't tare “smoothed out” and miss- Ingones are added. Thus, a DNA sequence is invented which doesn't exist in reality and which was never discovered and scientifically demonstrated as a whole. In a nutshell: From short fragments, theoretically and according to a model of Sorealled injection The cella die ‘ofblood or saliva from starvation from sickpeople and poisoning — | ; ieee i Lees] “ eel “infectious experiment” False bel ‘The cls de fom a vias ‘The ells die bystaration and poisoning i lea “Control experiments” Realty To date, neither medicine The cal die from star~ ror “science” have carried vation and poisoning ‘ut conta experiments, 4 virus DNA. a bigger piece is also theoretically fabricated, which in reality doesn’t exist. For example, the *theoreti- cal" construction of the measles virus DNA with its short fragments of cellular particles is missing more than half of the molecule sequences which would represent a complete virus. These ate in part artificially ereated by biochemical methods and the rest are simply invented* The Chinese scientists who now claim thatthe nucleic acids from which the genome of the new Corona-viruszoi9 was theoretically constructedg probably originate from poiton- ‘ous snakes are alzo the vitims ofthis current global mi conception regarding "viruses", as we all are. The more viral “DNA sequences” ate invented, the mote they “discover” similarities with everything. These errors happen methot cally A large part of our academic science works like this: A theory is invented, itis always argued inside the theory, they call it science and claim that this represents the reality In reality it just represents the postulated theory! >5 WSSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin oz Ausrug Diagram 2: How a vital DNA sequence is hypothetically constructed from typical cellular molecules and how it was proven during the measles virus tal that "ruses" ore only artificial maginary models Dying Calls teolation of specific particles | (Guelele acid) pica compo Avirus has never nents of ying appeared nor calls has it been seen ‘The Virus Tests ‘Due tothe lack of negative control experiments, it hasn't yet oc- curred tothe involved scientists that al tests fr “viruses” wilre- sultin a certain number of ‘positives, depending onthe sens tivtyofthe calibration ofthe testing equipment. The “templates” that they use in the tests in order to find the alleged “viruses” don't come frm “Weuses”, but rather fom the tissue, cells and foetal serum (blood without specific components) coming from animals, mainly monkeys and calves Because these animals are biochemically very similar to ushumans, its clea hat such pa ‘icles, which ate misinterpreted a veal particles, can be foundin all humans by means of virus tests". Some “viruses” and their ‘accines” ~ not the measles “virus” ~ actually originate fom aborted human foetuses itis especiallyeye-opening here that ll the teats detect molecules which exist in every human being and that vaccines can cause particulary dangerous allergireactions, ‘which have been named “autodmmune diseases”. ‘One ofthe most contaminated und impure components of vac- ines i the bovine foetal serum, without which the tissue and cals inthe laboratory don't grow at all or don't grow quickly fmough, and which is extracted in the most gruesome man- ner from foetuses without anaesthesia. It contains all kinds of known and unknown microbes, their spores and a huge number ‘of unknown proteins. Besides the particles rom monkey kidney tissue, itis alo particles of his foetal serum that scientists are ‘extracting and analysing when they believe that they are putting together a virus", which does not exist and was never proven Inthe entire “ecientiRe” literature asa whole “Wius” Determination ‘Sovall particles are ofthe composition theoretically added into virus model The cients beieve ‘The people invaed thatthe celia particles are pieces ofa virus Deleve that this imag nary. model represents "ius", although this model was never found inzeal fe Because the vacines ar exclusively manufactured onthe basis. ofthese substances, tis explains why itis especialy the vacci- nated people who test “postive” toall hese imaginary “viruses” from which vaccines are manufactured The tests only react to animal particles ofthe alleged viruses, animal proteins or nucleic _acide which are often identical or very similar to human proteins and nuclei aids. The vius tests do not find anything specific, certainly nothing “viral” and on account of this they are woth: less. The consequences, however, as we have seen with Ebola, HIV, Influenza etc, are that people become paralyzed with fear and they often die due tothe very dangerous treatment. kis noteworthy hat no so-alled “virus test” has a “yes” or“ result, rather they are calibrated in a way that they ean be inter- preted as “positive” only after a particular concentration level has been reached. Thus, one can arbitrarily test “postive” just a few people, many people, none oral people and animals, ac- cording tothe calibration of the test kit The dimension ofthis entre scietifcillusion becomes lear as soon as we understand, that otherwise quite “normal” symptoms are only diagnosed as [AIDS BSE, fu, measles ete. ifthere isa "postve” test fort Crucial Details Up to 1952 the vcologists believed that a virus was a toxic protein or enzyme directly poisoning the body and that ie was somehow multiplied by the body itself and would spread in the body as well as between people and between animals. B>(6 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin o/2020:Austug Medicine and science gave up on ths idea in 195, because the suspected vrushad never been seen in an electron miero= scope and, above all, no control experiments had ever been carted out It was acknowledged that even healthy animals, ‘organs and tissue would release during the decomposing ro ‘ess the same decay products that had been previouslymisin- terpreted as “viruses”. Virologyhad refuted itself* However, when the wife ofthe later Nobel prize winner Crick drew a double helix and this drawing was published inthe f- ‘mous scientife magazine Nature a8 an alleged scientifialy developed model ofthe supposed DNA, a new and very suc cessful hype began, the so-alled molecular genetics. From that moment on, the causes of disease were thought to be in the genes. The idea of a virus changed and over night a Virus was no longer a toxin but rather a dangerous genetic se- quence, a dangerous DNA, a dangerous viral strand etc. This, new genetic virology was founded by young chemists who had. no idea about biology and medicine, but they had unlimited research money. And they dnt know thatthe old virology had already refuted tse For over 2000 years we have the saying: forgive them, for they Jnownot what they do. Since 1955, since we asked the questions about the evidence and published the answers, we ean add: for ‘they an't admit that what theyhave lee and practiced isn't tue and, mote than that, itis dangerous or even lethal. Be cause nebody untl now understood the entire context and had the courage to saythe ruth, we now have even more subsidiary hypotheses, such a the “immune system” ot “epigenetcs™ in ‘order to maintain the fettous theories The idea of a veus arose from the forced logic ofthe dogma of celular theory. Then came the idea ofthe pathogenic bacr teria, the bacterial toxins, then the vial toxins, uni this dea was finaly given up in 3952, Starting with 1953, Virchows idea cof a disease poison (Latin = virus) became the genetic virus, which in turn gave birth tothe idea ofthe cancer genes, then we had the "war agtinst cancer" founded in the Nixon era, and later the idea of genes for everything appeated. In the year 2000, however, the entire genetic theory was refuted as wel, after the contradictory data ofthe so-called human ge- nome project was published together with the embarrassing, claim cht the entie human genome had been mapped, even, ‘though mare than half oft was completely invented? People are not aware that itis very difficult forthe respective academies to admit that they were involved in such miscon- ceptions. The so-called bacteria-eaters ‘The model forthe ides of genetic virus in humans, animals and plants, which started to develop from 1953 onwards, were the so-called bacteriaveatrs, called (bactrio)phages, which had drawn the attention of scientists since 193. From 2938, when commercially available electron microscopes were applied in research, these phages could be photographed, igalated as whale particles and all thei components could be biochemically determined and characterised. To isolate them, ie. concentrate the particles and separate them fom all other components (isolation), to photograph them im- ‘mediately inthe isolated state and to biochemically charac- terise them allin one go this, however, has never happened with the alleged viruses of humans, animals and plants be- cause these do not exist ‘The scientists researching bacteria and phages, who worked with actual existing structures, provided a model as to what human, animal and plant viruses could look lke. However, the “phage experts” have overlooked by their misinterpre- tation of phages as bacteria eaters thatthe phenomenon of the formation of these particles is caused by the extreme inbreeding of bacteria. This effect, ie. the formation and release of phages (bacteria eaters, aka bacteria viruses), doesn't exist with pure bacteria freshly extracted from an ‘organism or from the environment. When their nutrients are Withdraw slowiy or thei living conditions become impossi- bile, normal bacteria, e. bacteria which are nat grown in the lab, create the known survival forms, the spores, which can survive for along time or even “eternally”. From spares, new bacteria appear a8 s00n asthe living conditions improve However, isolated bacteria, when grown in the lab, lose all characteristics and abilities. Many of them do not perish automatically through this in-breeding, but rather turn sud~ denlyand completely into small particles, which in the “good versus evil" theory perspective have been misinterpreted as bacteriaeaters. In realty, bacteria originate from these exact “phages” and they turn back again into these lif forms when the living conditions are no longer available, Ganther Ender- lein (2827-1968) described exactly these processes: how bac- teria appear from invisible structures, thei development into mate complex forms and back again. That is why Enderlein did not agree withthe cll theory, according to which life ap- pears fom cells ands organised a cellular level Asa young, student, myselfisolated sucha “phage” structure fiom a sea Alene and believed at that time to have discovered the frst, harness virus, the fst stable "virus host system”? ‘The idea that bacteria exist as single viable organisms, which ‘an exist alone without any other life forms, is incorrect. In an isolated form, they automatically die off after some time. This never occurred to the scientists, because after a suc- cessful “isolation” of a bacterium, a pat oft is frozen and can be worked with inthe lab decades later. The idea of bac- teria being living independent structures which can survive by themselves isa laboratory artefact, a misinterpretation. Thus, the claim that bacteria ate immortal is therefore wrong, Bacteria are immortal only in symbiosis with 2 huge number of other bacteria, fungi and probably many more un known life forms which are dificult to characterise, such a8 for example the amoeba. Amoebae, bacteria and fungi form spores as soon as their living environment disappears and. re-emerge once the living conditions return. Ifone compares that with humans, we have the same perspective: Without a living envitonment, from and with which we lve, nothing, ean exist, >17 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS again laano:Austug However, these discoveries go much deeper, Not onlythe entire species concept is dissolving, but also the idea and the claim about the alleged existence of dead matter. Observations and ‘conclusions about alving “active matter” (as physicists calle) are dismissed as unscientific talism, However, there is con- siderable evidence tha all thore elements that the “dominant ‘opinion” in “science” does not consider as being alive actual- Iy oviginate and develop fiom the membrane of wate, Le. the "Ursubstan2™, the primordial source of lie. These elements then ereate the nuclei acids, and around the nucleic acids they ‘reat the biological fein the form of amoebae, bacteria tardi- ‘pades and mare complex life farms. We have two distinct con- firmatons on this perspective. One of them can be observed by ‘every person for himelfas wells for ather people. that bi: ‘ological fe inthe form oF our bodys actually a materiaiation ‘ofthe elements ofan existing conscience. We can name ther and we ow the exact way in which our organs and psyche interact and influence each other through information eg a ‘Single word which ean either do damage or slvea conflict), we can verify ll these aspects because they are precitible. Thus, ‘the three criteria of scientificresearch are fulfled These find- ings andthe knowiedge on how they relate to each other free us {from feat as wel as from the fer-inducing “good versus evil ‘mentality and the behavioural patterns deriving fom i. These revealing scientific discoveries clarify as well the processes of disease, healing, the “healing crisis", the suspended healing, and the phenomenon of subsequent diseates aka the old con- cept of contagion”) Virus, its time to go:* The nightmare of the materialistic science seems to come true: even the apparently dead matters alive itis vita. The Vitalism, according to which there isa life force in all things, was contested by the Greek philosophers Demokrit and Epi> kur and the followers oftheir doctrine, Their main argument was that they wanted to castigate any abuse of faith and pre- vent its repetition. Their intention was apparently good, how- eer, they ignored that by denying the concepts of conscience and sprit and all the levels of manifestation of these forces, they tured involuntarily into destroyers oflife and enemies ofthe people. ‘These “good versus evil” interpretations, which were discov: cred and described by Silo Gesell (in general) and Ivan lich (in meine), are constantly increasing due tthe thirst for profit andits fatal consequences. The consequences of our money system's inherent compulsion to even more growth, to permanent growth, which generates cylial catastrophes and brings about even more powerful winners and simultaneously 1 constantly increasing impoverishment and suffering, is be- ing interpreted by all the people involved as proof for an inde- pendent principle of evil because these people don't know the mathematically determined, tenacious inherent mechanisms ofthe money system. It appears thatthe people on the winning, side, who are ethically corect, regard the mathematically ob- ory generated profit as evidence of their godliness and ex- {4 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magasnox2080- Ausrug In order to exclude that it was not the fds of diseased tissue that caused the symptoms, one would have had to do an iden tical experiment, only with ther fuids or with stesed fds However, that has never happened, Extremely rue animal experiments are carted out to date —for example inorder to prove the transmissibility ofmeasles; during, these experiments, monkeys are tied and immobilised ina vacue tum chamber wth a tube in their nose, and then tortured by sci> centsts who insert the allegely infected fluids through the tube intothe trachea and lungs othe monkeys The exact same dam= age would be caused by sterile saline solution, steried blood, ppusor saliva. The induced symptoms, which ae ony “similar” C0 measles are then claimed tobe measles Since the allegedly infected fuids are pressed through a filter which allegedly ites out bacteria and they ae slightlyheated, the scientists claim thatthe suffering and death ofthe animals in those experiments cannot be caused by bacteria, but rather bysmaller “pathogens”, the viruses. The involved scientists ig- nored the fact already acknowledged at that time that there are ‘extremely more unknown bacteria than known ones, that many bacteria ate heat resistant and that they fom spotes which ean- not be fitrated, It is important to mention here that there Is no evidence whatsoever that bacteria cause any disease either. They ae of course often present in the disease proces, like the Firemen putting out the fre. Bacteria do not cause disease, but rather they participate in biological meaningful reparation processes. As with viruses, the only so-called evidence for the apparently negative role of bacteria are the horfc animal ex- periments which are completely meaningless, since all control experiments are missing Enders and Polio Upto the year 1949. the “vtologists” cultivated their suspect ced “Viruses” (proteins) by placing 2 piece of putrescent ge- netic material, which had been taken from a tissue allegedly infected by a virus, on a sic of healthy" tissue ofthe same type. The visible intensification ofthe pultefaction pracess, hich was transmitted ftom the "sick" tissue to the “healthy” tissue, was misinterpreted as proliferation and spreading of ‘the virus, ofthe pathogenic poison. Due to control experi- rents with healthy tissue carried out for the First ie in 195 the virologists discovered that what they saw were quite nor- mal processes of tissue decay and nota virus that would only be present in “sick” tissue Enders “discovered” by chance in 1949 ~ because he had no fresh “healthy” nerve tissue available ~ that other types of tissue started to decompose as well fa piece of brain from 4 person who died of polio was placed on i. Previously, the virologists had believed that every virus could only propagate Inthe genetic material that it would alsa damage. Fr the al= leged discovery that “viruses” propagate in other tissues a5, well, which they don't damage in ive humans, Enders and the other involved academics were awarded the Nobel Prize fot Medicine on 30 June 1954 From then on, the alleged “pli virus” was propagated by mine ing human foetal skin tssue and muscle with bran substance ‘rom people who had died of "polio" thus inducing total decay ‘The filtrate from this mixture was considered to contain a virus ‘The famous Jonas Salk adopted this exact idea without naming, the inventor. Salkused the Fitrate of decayed human foetal tissue as 2 polio vaccine, the New York Times stated thatthe vaccine worked and would be safe and Salk generated millions of dallas with the polo vaccine, without sharing anything withthe realin- ventor ofthe idea of using decomposing human feetuses* For these reasons, Enders worked hard to develop anather tech nique, for which he could take the credit fom the very beginning. He chose the second most lucrative area ofthe germ theoty of disease, namely that of the symptoms called measles. Enders used the same ideas and methods fiom bacteriology Gn which hhehad graduated) and believed thatthe phages were the viruses ofbacteia, ‘Analogous to this technique of demonstrating how phages alle: ‘edly destroybacteria on aPeti dish, he developed tissue streak ‘on which allegedly infected fui was placed, Analogous to the dying off ofthe bacteria, the dying of ofthe tissue streak was claimed to be atthe same time the presence ofthe suspected virus, the proof forts existence its isolation and its propagation This precise protocol ssl applied to dat in cases of measles and, sghty modified, ac “evidence” ofl pathogenic viruses The misture of dying or dead cllsissues is now called a “lve vaccine". If singe parties of dead tssue or sythethcally pro- duced molecules are used in vaccines, the experts call “kiled saccine” or “inactivated vacine” Enders blamed the strikingly high numbers of deaths and inj ries thatthe Salk polio vaccine caused inthe population on the contamination ofthe vaccine, whichis why he worked in his lab with tissues rom monkey kidneys and fetal serum fom horses and unborn calves. There are four striking and crucial diferences between the ev: idence of the existing (bacterio)phages and Enders’ alleged evidence of the hypothetc “viruses” in humans and animals. These differences clarify Enders’ wrong assumptions, since he completely forgot his eatlercleaty expressed doubts once he had received the Nobel prize, and so he ld all ofhis colleagues and consequently the entre wrld (see Corona pane) down the ‘wrong path... The entire world, except a pretty but stubborn schwabian village nea the lake Konstanz (where Dr Lanka lives): 2. The (bacteriophages have indeed been isolated inthe mean ing ofthe word “isolation” with standard methods (density sra- dient centrifugation). Immediately aftr the isolation they have been photographed in an electron microscope, thle purity is determined and then their components, their proteins and their DNAhave been biochemically described all at once, one single paper 2 Withrespectto al “viruses” of humans, animals or plants, no Virus was ever isolated, photographed in an isolated form and. its components were never biochemically characterised all at ‘once from the “izlate” >19 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magain oniso20: Ausaug In reality there was a consensus process over years, in which single particles of dead cells were theoretically ascribed to a virus model. The phages served as 2 model for this entire in- terpretation process, as we can see clearly rom the frst daw ings ofa “virus” 43 The tissue and cells used forthe “proof and propagation” of “viruses” ae prepared in a very special manner before the act ofthe alleged “infection”. 80% oftheir nutrients is withdrawn, 10 that they can become “hungry” and better absorb the “vie ruses". Theyare treated with antibotiesin order to exclude the possibility that bacteria, which are present always and every wherein all tssues and serums, may cause the expected death ofthe cells It was acknowledged only in 1972 by biochemistry experts that those antibiotics were damaging and king the cells by themselves, a fact that the virologats had previously ignored "Starvation" and “poisoning” is whatilsthe cells, but ‘this was and sil is misinterpreted as the presence isolation, ‘effect and propagation ofthe hypothetical viruses 4. The control experiments that are crucial and requited in ei tence have to date not been carried out with respect to viruses: they could exclide the possiblity that instead of a virus just ‘typical cell particles were misinterpreted as a virus. The contol ‘experiments regarding the isolation, biochemical description and electron micrographs ofthe phages, however, were all car- tied out. Thus, Enders speculations dated 3 June 1954" about the pos sible proof of an “agent” which could “possibly” play a tole in measles became an apparently "scientic™ fact and the exclusive basis fr the entire new genetic virology after 952, all because of his Nobel prize forthe “human foetus/polio Virus vaccine” in December 1954. A few months after having received his Nobel prize, Enders forgot or suppressed the discrepancies and doubts that he had mentioned himself in his 194 paper. Still suffering due tothe plagiarism committed by Jonas Salk, who had stolen his idea forthe polio vaccine, Enders stated that all future developments ofa measles vac~ cine would have to be based on his (Enders) technique. Enders killed his tissue cultures himself through the treat- ment with antibiotics (without negative control experiments ~ and thisisa crucial aspectin the context of mandatory mea- sles vaccination). Ever since Enders experimented with sue fom a young boy named David Edmonston, the first model of 1 measles “virus” (hypothetically pu together rom particles cof dead tissue) has been called the "Edmonston strain". The ‘measles vaccine, as tosic sum of al those decayed pieces of tissue, is also claimed to contain the “Edmonston strain". A art ofthat mixture containing dead monkey tissue and foetal bovine serum is being constantly frozen and then used regu larly to “inoculate” other dying tissue/cell in order to create “measles viruses” and “ive vaccines” The importance of winning the measles virus trial The crucial expert opinions, protocols and rulings of the measles virus trial (2012-2017) that | will refer to in the following. are feely available on the internet wwmwissen- schaffiplusdefblog Further expert opinions and refutations ofthe claims regarding the measles virus, which the Court did not take into account, are published inthe editions of the WissenschaffPlus magazine from 2014 to 2017 The background of the measles virus tral, which began in zon, was fo prevent the planned compulsory measles vac Cinations. A former Federal justice minister had called me and asked for scientific data to help stop the introduction of mandatory vaccination. A leading senior state prose- cutor gave us the idea to offer a prize for the proof of the “measles virus” and, in the subsequent civil ral, to legally establish that there is no scientific evidence forthe claims that the measles virus exlats and that vaccines were safe and effective. Our plan was entirely successful. This is easily un- derstandable if one knows why the paper by John Franklin Enders et al. dated 2 June gs4 became the only and exclusive basis of the entire new genetic virology ofthe "live virus” vaccine production after the ald virology had died a natural death in apsi-igs2 Knowing thatthe Robert Koch Institute (RK), contrary to its legal duty, had not published a single paper on the alleged ‘existence ofthe measles virus, | offered a €100,000 prize for scientific paper from the RKI containing the scientific evi- dence for the existence ofthe measles virus. A young doctor from Saarland presented me with six papers but none from the RKI; the papers were: the one from Enders dated 3 June 1954 and five others, based exclusively on Enders" paper, one of them being the most comprehensive review of other pa- pers on the measles virus. In this “review” they describe the laborious consensus-bullding process which lasted for dec~ adesand included dilemmas such as which parts ofthe dead tissue ae tobe ascribed tothe measles virus model and also how the measles virus model had to be constantly modified. | replied to the young doctor (who urgently recommended me to waive the (indeed) costly “legal dispute” and to im- ‘mediately pay him the prize money) that in none of the sb publications was there any identifiable viral structure, but rather easly recognisable typical celular particles and struc tures, Thereupon he filed a suit with the Ravensburg Local Court, however, without submitting the six publications to the court. The Ravensburg Court decided against me, even ‘though the six publications never appeared inthe legal les. Apart from that, the verdict of the Ravenburg Local Court occurred under more than unusual circumstances." ‘The plaintiff admitted tothe judge during the appeal at the Stuttgart Higher Court that he himself had never read the six publications. So he was planning to shut me down and. thus silence the central refutation of the vaccination through the tedious legal battle", He may have been a vitim of the false belief in viruses himself, because he probably trusted his teachers, who had no idea about the erroneous develop- ment in medicine since 1858 and did not de any historical research with respect to thet false beliefs, thus becoming. simultaneously culprits and victims oftheir fatal beliein the term theories and their trust in vaccinations. >to WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin olz020:Austus Ie is plausible that the plaintiff did not read the six publi= cations he presented to me, but not tothe court. At least i is clear that he didn't Sook for them himself, because they are the only publications in the entire field of about 30,000 technical articles about “measles” in which reference to the accepted existence of the measles virus is made. However, all the tons of other papers, which nobody can ever finish reading, assume “a rior” the existence ofthe measles virus and always refer to citations of citations, which are finally and exclusively based on the alleged “evidence” supplied by Enders on 1 June s954 ‘The Ravensburg Local Court decided in 2014 to accept the lawsuit of Dr Bardens and concluded that the prize money was to be paid out even without any publication from the ARKL. Apart from that, the Ravensburg Local Court decided that it wouldn't be necessary for the scientific evidence for the existence ofthe measles virus tobe published in one sin- le pape, but rather that the overall 3366 papers (the sum of all the papers cited in the si submitted publications) for 1954 to 2007 was to be accepted as proof. The legally appointed expert Professor Podbielski from Ros- ‘ockargued accordingly (or the local court adjusted its open- ing decision tothe expert opinion): "Ihave to expressly clat- {y that one cannot provide evidence inthe classical sense in biology as one can in mathematics or physics. In biology one can only gather clues, which then in their entirety become conclusive Based on this extremely unscientific claim arising fram Pod bielsk's lack of arguments and his bias due to the discrep= ancies between reality and the beliefs he had grown so fond of, something happened which behavioural scientists call “displacement”. Podbielski invented a desperate excuse, namely that biology and the medicine based thereon as well as vaccinations ar per se unscentiicand without evidence, ‘without proof In his opinion, only collection of clues could “some day” and “somehow” (practically) become valid. A more explicit admission of the existent unscientific nature of current biology and medicine has never been expressed with such clarity What i most important at presenti to make legal use of al this evidence for the unscientific nature of the infection the- coryand the vaccination policies, which are already impacting ‘our constitutional rights. We need to make the mandatory ‘measles vaccination, voted upon and implemented in Ger- many as of March 2020, simply disappear Further information about thi willbe published in our news- letter. . Continuation ofthis article: 1. The duty of science to carry out contol experiments. The statements given to protocol by Professor Podbielski during, the measles viru tral that all the crucial publications abou the existence ofthe measles virus and all subsequent publi= cations, contrary his expert written opinion, da nat contain 2 single conttl experiment» 2 The crucial importance of the legal judgment from the Stuttgart Upper State Court from :6/o2/20%6, Article 12 U 65/5 for virology and vaccination polices." 4. Reports and advice on what has already been done in of- der to reverse the mandatory measles vaccination law wil followin the next WissenschafftPlus edition 2/2020.1 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magus a/20z0- Ausug List of sources "The Nobel Prize is for many reasons the most embarrassing thing that can happen toa scientist and to society: 1. All recognition is based on the respective “dominant api ion” ofthe academic orthodoxy and its claim toexclusveness. 2. Al such recognitions have proved tebe wrang after a short period ranging from several years to several decades. Thus, ‘he Nobel Prize impedes the advancement of cientificknow edge by turning mere assertions into dogmas. 43. A small number of extremely elitist people having left the realm of reality ate ultimately in chatge of deciding what is science and whatis not science. These people predefine "sci= etic” fashions and methods and suppress any knowledge that contradicts ther views. The practice of “Peer-Review", thats, the evaluation of scientific papers prier to their publi- cation, prevents that any undesired piece afknowedge refut- ing their ideas and dogmas ends up being published, For fur- ther information read the report about the Nobel Prize in the magazine WissenschaffPlus Nr, x/2017. The teport includes the picture ofa sculpture showing the essence of this issue and speaking louder than any words. “The members of the Libertas8Sanitas association in theit effort to stop mandatory vacination, have published compre hensive documentation about the knowledge available to the decision-makers in the health authorities. In that way it has bbeen proved that there is no data available in Germany that leads to the conclusion that vaccines ate safe and that vac ination only entails a small risk. Furthermore: In Germany theres no collection of data that helps verify if fllowing the WHO definitons, there was a propagation or epidemic of mea- sles of a stop to that propagation through vaccines for that matter. See: sowwlibertaseanitas.de. | also recommend the remarkable video “Verstand&Logik im Gesprich mit Priori (Masern-Mumpe-Rételn-Lebendimpfstoff [2020]" (English: " Mind&Lope in conversation with Priovx (measles - mumps — tubella~ attenuated vaccine) (2020) | Those fluent in English wil realize by reading the following publication thatthe construction ofa complet vial genome is just something purely theoretical: Complete Genome Sequence ‘of a Wild-Type Measles Virus Isolated during the Spring 2033, Epidemic in Getmany”, tobe found here: https! edoc.rkide? hhandle/s76904/1876. The Robert Koch Institute was involved in this research. Prof. Mankertz co-author of the publication and head ofthe National Reference Institute for Measles, Mumps and Rubella, claimed upon request that contrl experiments Were caied aut for this study inorder to rule out that typical call components were misinterpreted as viral particles. She re- fused however to release the documentation concerning these control experiments. Dring the appeal Prof. Mankert replied that she did nothave the contol experiments available, but she was sure that her colleagues in Munich should have carried out and documented such experiments. | personally wrote (0 all, authors and to their laboratory managers asking fr the con- tuo experiments, which are an obligation since 1998, No one answered. The rectors ofthe contacted research institutes did rot answer my questions either and so the appeal procedure ceameto nating + Publication of 22.2020: Homalogous recombination within the spike glycoprotein ofthe newly identified coronavirus may boost cross species transmission from snake to human. Au ‘thors: Wei i, We! Wang, Xiaofang Zhao, jujie 2a, Xingguang Li. Tobe found in this link: http//do.org/s0.100a/jmvas682 * For further information read the pages 33-36 of the article Eine neue Sichwese aufdac Leben - Tell” English: "A new perspective on life ~ Part I"), WissenschaffPlus magazine Ne 2/2019. In this article itis explained how almost any form of academic and state Fhanced science will automatically fllow an erroneous trend. The legal historian and sociologist Eugen Rosenstockalready showed this in 956, specifically naming the then already refuted theory of infection and cancer medicine “ Karheinz Lode: Zur Geschichte der then Virusforschung Wie sich mit technischen Fortchrtten bei der Untersuchung -fitrerbarer"infektioser Agenaien das Verstindnis der Vitus raturentwicket hate. (English: On the history of early virus tesearch, How technical progress in the investigation of "fk terable” infectious agents developed the understanding ofthe ature of viruses). Reprint Nr. 125 (1999) of the "Max-Planck stituts fr Wissenschaftsgeschichte” (Man-Planck-lnstitte for the history of science, 89 pages. "On the refutation ofall previousideas about a so-called genetic ‘material as building and function plan of life, you can tefer tomy articles inthe WissenchafRPhus magazine. The ines fr all pub lished editions since 2003's aullaleantheinternet Particularly worth reading isthe article “Erbgut in Aufasung”, published in “DIE ZEIT” on 3262008 (English: Genome in dissolution) that {savallable on the internet for free, This article summarizes that, the “genome” is constantly changing therefore it cannot cary ‘outthe things that scientist ascribe te genomes and aso that it changes ate misinterpreted as disease genes. + A good insight into the work and system of knowledge of Prof. Ginter Enderiein can be found in the doctoral thesis written by Eke Krimer ,Leben und Werk von Prof Or. pil Gunther Enderlein (1872 1968)” (English: Life and work of Prof Dr. phil. Ginther Enderiein (1872 968), published as a ‘book n 2012 by Reich! Verlag St. Goar. > Riesenvten und die Entstchung des Lebens (English: Giant viruses and the origin of life). WissenschaftPlus Nr. i204 “= Wasser begreifen, Leben erkennen, Wasser: Mer as nur cenergetisiertes HaO. (English: Understanding water, perce ing life. Pi-water: More than just energized Ha0), Wissen- schaffPlus Nr. 6/2038, This contribution can be found on our webpage wwwwissenschaffiplus de under "important texts” » See the introduction toa new perspective on life in issues 2, 2and 3/2019 of WissenschaftPlus + Comprehensive presentation ofthe measles vtus trial: 20 Virus go, Der Bundesgerichtshof list den Glauben an Viren untergehen (English: go virus go. The Federal Court lets the beliin viruses go down), WitsenschaffPlus Ne 2/2037, Alko free on the internet: wissenschafeplus de12 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS marin olzo20 Ausug » Asan introduction tothe findings and solution proposals of Silvio Gecell to ezcape from the autonomous mechanisms of the monetary system, you can read the book , Wet hat Angst vor Silvio Gesell" (English: Who fears Silvio Gesell) written by Hermann Benjs (292 pages) “elvan lich Die Nemesis der Medizin: Die Kriticder Meili. lerung des Lebens. (English: van Ilich. The nemesis of med: icine: erticiam on the medicalization of life) 9 pages, 2976 and 1995 » In his book .Can Medicine be cuted? The cortuption of a profession "the author Seamus O'Mahony, a famous rsh gastroenterologic, distort the writings of Wan lich lich states that his diagnosis on the perversion of medicine has as ts “only” cause the internal dynamics resulting from the profitemaking compulsion, being the pharmaceutical indus tty one more player in that system. O'Mahony on the othet hand blames the pharmaceutia) industry forthe corruption ofthe medical professions and concludes that medicine ca not be cured. According to him, medicine on its own would not be able to get rd ofthat perversion and only human tarian catastrophe of a war would make a reset possible. In this way he ovetsees the misconception that originated in 1838 due to Vitchow: The incorrect and, even at that time, baseless cellular pathology theoty hat was the diect pre cursor ofthe ater developed but equally wrong and dan- eros, theories about infection, the immune system, genes. and cancer. On page 262 of his book, the author acknowl ‘edges tha there was another school of medicine that under- stood health asa result of life being in harmony with itself ‘and with ts environment but that thie school had no chance He was referring tothe “psychosomatic” of Prof. Claus Bah= re Bahnson and his international colleagues. They did not make much progress ough, stuck as they were inthe false biochemistry ofthe cell theory. Only Dr. Ryke Gerd Hamer ‘ranaged to develop a scientific, comprehensive and individ alized psychosomatic theory “Rudolf Vitchow, ein Stratege der Macht. Teil: und Tel (English: Rudolf Vrchow, a strategist of power. Part and part 2) Siegfried Johann Mohr. WissenschaffPlus Nr, s2035 and Ne. 6/2035 and Entwickiung von Medizin und Menschheit.(Eng- lish: Development of medicine and mankind) Stefan Lanka WissenschafftPlus Nr. 6/2035, » Annette Hina-Wessels, Das Robert Koch-Institut im National: sotialismus (Enlsh: The Robert Koch Insitute under Nation- al Socialism) Kulturverlag Kados, 192 pages, 2012. The book points out that only after the German scientists opposing and. refuting the theory of infection wer killed, deported or impris: ‘nee, did the theory of infection turn inte a mainstream glob aly accepted theory. © See the English version ofthe Wikipedia article about John Franklin Enders, The First Measles Virus. Jefrey P. Baker. Verafenticht im Magazin Pediaties, September 2033, 328 (3) 485437; DOI: utps//deiorghioasezipeds.201.-a430 ' Propagation in Tissue Cultures of Cyeopathogenic Agents fiom Patients with Measles John F. Enders and Thomas C Peebles, im Magazin ,Proceedings of the Society for Experi mental Biology and Medicine", Vol. 86, lue 2 vorn 3.63954, Seite 277286, htips://doiory/10.383/00579727-86-21073 Sees, “Protocol ofthe trial of 123.2035 before the Ravensburg Local Court, page 7 lower section. See wwawissenschaftplus de/ blogide Protocol ofthe tral of 23 2015 before the Ravensburg Local Court, page 7 upper section. See wamiwissenschatftplus.de/ bloglde “To be found here http: (frbwejurisde or here en wanes senschaftplus de/blogideMAUNAWAI? Kini » Tischwasserfiltersystem Table Water Filter System — al? ee made in Germanymagazin Abonnement lise — = =) eee WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS | | WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS | WISSENSCHAFFIPLUS | | WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS | magazin ‘magazin ‘magazin | | magacin | tage * w [we —] fw | | | WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS | | WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS | | WISSENSCHAFTTPLUS magazin Zin ASSENSCHAFFTPLUS | igazin ve wens = [weesss we WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS | | WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS | | WSSENSCHAFFTPLUS | Abonnieren Sie jahrlich 4 Ausgaben _Bestellen Sie eine kostenlose des W* magazins: Probeausgabe (als PDF oder Print) von Wissenschaffiplus als gedrucktes Heft: 29 Euro ice als PDF per E-Mail: 18 Euro per E-Mail: info@wplus-verlag.de, oder gedruckt+PDF: 38 Euro Fax: 03327-5708930, unter wwwwissenschaffiplus.de oder telefonisch: 03327 7265079 Ll