The Supreme Court issued a resolution authorizing the Office of the Clerk of Court to change the policy regarding motions for extension of time to file a petition for review. Specifically, the Clerk of Court is no longer required to ensure such motions provide a full statement of all material dates, including the dates of receipt of the assailed judgment and filing of the motion for reconsideration. Instead, the motions need only state the date of receipt of the denial or dismissal of the assailed decision and/or denial of the motion for reconsideration. This change was made to allow for more effective delivery of justice by not denying motions for failure to provide all dates when some dates are omitted.
Original Description:
Original Title
A.M. No. 04-7-03-SC - Section 2, Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure As Amended
The Supreme Court issued a resolution authorizing the Office of the Clerk of Court to change the policy regarding motions for extension of time to file a petition for review. Specifically, the Clerk of Court is no longer required to ensure such motions provide a full statement of all material dates, including the dates of receipt of the assailed judgment and filing of the motion for reconsideration. Instead, the motions need only state the date of receipt of the denial or dismissal of the assailed decision and/or denial of the motion for reconsideration. This change was made to allow for more effective delivery of justice by not denying motions for failure to provide all dates when some dates are omitted.
The Supreme Court issued a resolution authorizing the Office of the Clerk of Court to change the policy regarding motions for extension of time to file a petition for review. Specifically, the Clerk of Court is no longer required to ensure such motions provide a full statement of all material dates, including the dates of receipt of the assailed judgment and filing of the motion for reconsideration. Instead, the motions need only state the date of receipt of the denial or dismissal of the assailed decision and/or denial of the motion for reconsideration. This change was made to allow for more effective delivery of justice by not denying motions for failure to provide all dates when some dates are omitted.
Re: Section 2, Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure As
Amended Gentlemen: Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated JUL 13 2004. Submitted for consideration of the Court is a Memorandum addressed to the Honorable Justice Reynato S. Puno, as Chairman, of the Second Division by Atty. Ludichi Yasay-Nunag, Clerk of Court of the said Division, relative to the motions for extension of time under Section 2, Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, within which to file petition for review on certiorari which assails not only the judgment of the lower court or government agency but also the resolution of denial of the motion for reconsideration thereof. The Division Clerk of Court seeks authority to discontinue the policy of requiring a full statement of material dates in said motions for extension of time. In reporting for the agenda of the Court, the Office of the Division Clerk of Court (DCC) states that it initially examines whether petitioners indicated in their motions the complete statement of material dates, i.e., the dates of receipt of the assailed judgment, filing of the motion for reconsideration, and receipt of the resolution of denial of the motion for reconsideration. In some instances where the motions merely stated the date of receipt of the resolution of denial and failed to state the dates of receipt of the assailed judgment and the filing of the motion for reconsideration, it notes that said omissions resulted in the denial of the motions for failure to show that petitioners have not lost the fifteen (15)-day reglementary period within which to appeal. Section 4, Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure requires, among others, that the petition shall indicate the material dates showing when notice of judgment or final order or resolution subject thereof was received, when motion for new trial or reconsideration, if any, was filed and when notice of the denial thereof was received. Such requirements, however, are not required in a motion for extension of time to file a petition for review under Section 2, Rule 45 of the Rules. IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING, and for a more effective delivery of justice, the Court hereby authorizes the Office of the Clerk of Court to include in its report of motions for extension of time to file petition only the date of receipt by petitioner of the denial/dismissal of the assailed decision and/or the denial of the motion for reconsideration, provided, however, that when a motion for extension of time to file petition is granted, it shall be counted from the expiration of the reglementary period and conditioned upon the timeliness of the filing of the motion. Very truly yours, (Sgd.) LUZVIMINDA D. PUNO Clerk of Court