The use of vector-controlled induction motors represents an alternative to the

other forms of brushless motors for servo drives. In the selection of a vector-
controlled induction motor, the following points need to be considered,
particularly when they are being compared with permanent-magnet sine-wave-wound
motors:

•
Induction motors are inherently more difficult to control.

•
Induction-motor drives are typically larger than permanent-magnet sine-wave wound
motor-drives, for identical output powers; this is because of the rotor power loss
in induction motors. Therefore, a provision may have to be made for forced cooling.

•
For the same output torque, the efficiency (which directly dictates the frame size)
is lower for induction motors. Permanent-magnet sine-wave wound machines have of
higher efficiencies because of the lack of any rotor losses.

•
Induction motors can be designed for higher flux densities than those of permanent-
magnet sine-wave-wound motors, which are limited by the design of the rotor and its
permanent magnets.

•
Induction motors cost less than the equivalent permanent-magnet sine-wave-wound
motors, due to their simplicity and lack of permanent magnets.

•
In induction motors, field weakening is easily achieved over a wide speed range;
this is not possible in permanent-magnet sine-wave-wound motors.

•
The vector control of induction motors requires a considerable amount of computing
power, and while microprocessors are an advantage they are not a necessity. In
safety-critical applications, the use of motors incorporating sophisticated
microprocessor-based controllers may constitute an undue safety risk