Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Optimal BESS Allocation With Increased Photovoltaic Penetration in Distribution System by Utilizing GA and Another Loss Sensitivity Based Approach
Optimal BESS Allocation With Increased Photovoltaic Penetration in Distribution System by Utilizing GA and Another Loss Sensitivity Based Approach
pillar’s brick. Aside from this other applicable requirement [16]. Both buses are connected through a transmission line
that should be considered when modelling BESS specialized which has resistance (𝑅𝑖 ) and reactance (𝑋𝑖 ) for this line and
qualities as such as round circle efficiency, charging and dis- 𝑌𝑖 is expressed as line admittance. 𝑉𝑖 and 𝑉𝑖+1 are expressed
charging power. both qualities are extraordinary and distinc- as both end bus voltages.
tive for every BESS innovation relying upon the BESS limit The real and reactive power losses across the transmis-
and discharge time necessity [2] - [8]. sion line of two buses can be obtained by following equa-
Among different BESS innovations Vanadium redox bat- tions:
tery (VRB) has most noteworthy life cycle. The principle
downside of Lead-acid batteries is their constrained cycle
life and the fundamental impediment of Nickel–cadmium 𝑃𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠ℎ ℎ
= 𝑅(𝑖,𝑖+1) (∣ 𝑉(𝑖,𝑖+1) − 𝑉𝑖ℎ ∣ × ∣ 𝑌(𝑖,𝑖+1)
ℎ
∣)2 (1)
(𝑖,𝑖+1)
(Ni–Cd) cells is the nearness of poisonous substantial metal
Cadmium [8]. Lithium-particle (Li-particle) batteries are for
the most part a choice in brief timeframe scale applications, 𝑄𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠ℎ ℎ
= 𝑋(𝑖,𝑖+1) (∣ 𝑉(𝑖,𝑖+1) − 𝑉𝑖ℎ ∣ × ∣ 𝑌(𝑖,𝑖+1)
ℎ
∣)2 (2)
because of their generally high every day self-release, some- (𝑖,𝑖+1)
where in the range of 1 and 5%. Vanadium Redox Battery where, 𝑃𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠ℎ and 𝑄𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠ℎ are network hourly active
(VRB) is an exceptional sort of flow batteries. Because of (𝑖,𝑖+1) (𝑖,𝑖+1)
little self-discharge every day, it is appropriate for long ca- and reactive power losses in the line for time varying load.
pacity span, for example, hours or months. Likewise, VRB The power losses can be obtained by adding the active
have the most noteworthy cycle life, and consequently, are and reactive power lossess throughout the day. According to
received in this paper. The cycle life is around 12,000 [5] literature most of the studies shows that BESS supply only
regardless of whether the battery depth of discharge (DoD) real power in the system and has a unity power factor. So
is 100% [9] - [16]. the total daily power losses can be expressed by following
This paper presents another approach for siting and siz- equation:
ing of BESS in PV-BESS project in time varying different
∑
24 ∑
𝑁
load models in distribution system. A control strategy is pre- 𝑃𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠 = 𝑃𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠ℎ (3)
sented for utilize the PV output in conjunction with battery in ℎ=1 𝑖=1
(𝑖,𝑖+1)
and 𝑄𝐷𝑡𝑦𝑝𝑒
ℎ respectively obtained for each bus by utilizing 3.1. Minimize annual energy losses
following equations: When PV penetration is increased, the load side energy
production may be more than consumers’ demand. As a re-
sult, power is back to the transmission network and voltage
ℎ
𝑃 𝐷𝑡𝑦𝑝𝑒 ℎ
= 𝑃 𝐷𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 ∗ (𝐿𝐹 )ℎ𝑡𝑦𝑝𝑒 (6) magnitude and energy losses may be enhanced. To adapt to
this issue, BESS is charged when production of PV is more
than consumers’demand and discharged when consumers’
demand is enhanced. This benefit can be modeled as below
ℎ
𝑄𝐷𝑡𝑦𝑝𝑒 ℎ
= 𝑄𝐷𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 ∗ (𝐿𝐹 )ℎ𝑡𝑦𝑝𝑒 (7) in (10)
The total power demand in distribution system can be ∑
24
obtained by adding hourly active and reactive power demand 𝑀𝑖𝑛.(𝑃𝐿𝑜𝑠𝑠 ) = 364 × ℎ
(𝑃 𝐷𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 ℎ
− 𝑃 𝐷𝑡𝑦𝑝𝑒 ) (10)
of all the buses in the network. This calculation is epressed 𝑛=1
in following equations: where 𝑃𝐿𝑜𝑠𝑠 is annual energy loss reduction.
𝐼 ℎ ⩽ 𝐼𝑚𝑎𝑥 (17)
4.10.1. PV project
The simulation results for the PV project, the annual re-
duction in energy losses, improvment in voltage at weakest
bus in IEEE 69 bus test distribution system are shown in Ta-
ble 2. As compared to base case, the reduction in annual
energy losses in each load model due to connection of PV
project in distribution networks was signinicantly higher.The
system performance in term of energy loss reduction and re-
duction in overvoltage at buses in each time varying load
model were noticed. In this project, power demand, PV out-
put for IEEE 69 bus system are presented in Figure 14, 15
and 16 for time varying load models i.e. commercial, resi-
dential and industrial respectively. Furthermore, the connec-
tion effect of PV project in the distribution system was ex-
amined by comparing both PV project and base case results
to each other. it is also noticed that only commercial load
peak demand is managed by PV generation. Other rest two
Figure 6: Flowhart for proposed methodology loads i.e. residential and industrial load peak demand comes
between 19 to 23 Hrs. so PV project fail to supply electricity
in this condition and losses were increased in both cases.
In the optimization process, load flow analysis and BESS
capacity adjustment are implemented to optimize the schedul- 4.10.2. PV-BESS project
ing of BESS and adjust the capacity of BESS. Newton raph- The simulation results for the PV-BESS project, the an-
son method is adopted to optimize the charging/discharging nual reduction in energy losses, improvment in voltage at
power of BESS to accomplish minimum network losses. Based weakest bus and the enhancement in penetration of PV in
on optimal scheduling of BESS, the step of BESS capacity IEEE 69 bus test distribution system are shown in Table 3.
adjustment, charging/discharging done by considering 𝐹 (𝛼). As compared to PV project case, the reduction in annual en-
The BESS capacity optimized at a single node [17] can meet ergy losses in each load model due to connection of BESS
the necessities of one-day energy charging/discharging. At units in distribution networks was signinicantly higher.The
Figure 7:Hourly Voltage prole Comparison for commercial load with considered cases in
IEEE-69 bus network
Figure 8: Hourly Line current prole Comparison for commercial load with considered
cases in IEEE-69 bus network
system performance in term of energy loss reduction, en- current profile comparison for IEEE 69 bus test system are
hancements in PV penetration and reduction in overvoltage presented by considering each type of load models in Fig. 7
at buses in each time varying load model were noticed. In to 12.
this project, power demand, PV output and batteries charg-
ing/discharging for IEEE 69 bus system are presented in Fig- 4.11. Simulation results and discussion
ure 14, 15 and 16 for time varying load models i.e. commer- The execution site and capacity of BESS are determined
cial, residential and industrial respectively. Furthermore, the by the proposed method. In the simulation study, the effect
connection effect of BESS unit in the distribution system was of PV penetration, energy losses and performance of system
examined by comparing both PV-BESS and PV project re- parameter is assessed.; PV penetration is characterized as the
sults to each other. The 3D model of bus voltage and line proportion of total PV rating power to maximum apparent
power of load and it is also depend on type of time varying
Figure 9:Hourly Voltage prole comparison for Residential load with considered cases in
IEEE-69 bus network
Figure 10: Hourly Line current prole comparison for Residential load with considered
cases in IEEE-69 bus network
Table 2
Simulation result on IEEE 69 BUS test Network with PV
Parameters Commercial Residential Industrial
Base Case with PV Base Case with PV Base Case with PV
Figure 11:Hourly Voltage prole comparison for Industrial load with considered cases in
IEEE-69 bus network
Figure 12: Hourly Line current prole comparison for Industrial load with considered cases
in IEEE-69 bus network
load (commercial, residential and industrial ) profile. demand fulfilled PV generation. It is also shown in Fig.
Simulation results for both cases are presented in Table 3 that residential and industrial peak load demand comes
2 and Table 2. The graphical 3D representation and compar- around in between 19 hours to 23 hours. The energy losses
ison of hourly bus voltage profile, hourly line current profile are high during peak load hours. So as a result of this PV
and 2D power Loss profile for each type of time varying load project only mitigate the commercial peak demand. But PV-
(commercial, residential and industrial) are shown in Figure BESS project utilize the BESS to mitigate the peak demand
7 to 12 respectively. on each load profiles and reduce the annual energy losses.
4.12. Effect on Peak power dispatch 4.13. Effect on Annual Energy Losses
In general out of three time varying load model (com- The arrangement of output power from PV-BESS project
mercial, residential and industrial) only commercial load peak for each time varying load model was performed by optimal
Table 3
Simulation result on IEEE 69 BUS test Network with PV-BESS
Parameters Commercial Residential Industrial
Base Case with PV- Base with PV- Base Case with
BESS Case BESS PV-
BESS
Figure 13: Hourly power loss prole for commercial, residential & industrial Load with
considered cases in IEEE-69 bus network
[6] Lee, T.-Y., Chen, N., Lee, T., et al.: ‘Determination of optimal con-
tract capacities and optimal sizes of battery energy storage systems for
time-of-use rates industrial customers’, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.,
1995, 10, (3), pp. 562–568
[7] Borowy, B.S., Salameh, Z.M.: ‘Methodology for optimally sizing the
combination of a battery bank and PV array in a wind/PV hybrid sys-
tem’, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 1996, 11, (2), pp. 367–375
[8] Eyer, J., Iannucci, J., Butler, P.: ‘Estimating electricity storage power
rating and discharge duration for utility transmission and distribution
deferral’, 2005
[9] Oudalov, A., Chartouni, D., Ohler, C.: ‘Optimizing a battery energy
storage system for primary frequency control’, IEEE Trans. Power
Syst., 2007, 22, (3), pp. 1259–1266
[10] Brown, P.: ‘Optimization of pumped storage capacity in an isolated
power system with large renewable penetration’, IEEE Trans. Power
Syst., 2008, 23, (2), pp. 523–531
[11] Le, H., Nguyen, T.: ‘Sizing energy storage systems for wind power
firming: an analytical approach and a cost-benefit analysis’. IEEE PES
General Meeting, 2008, (II), pp. 1–8
[12] Mohammad Rasol Jannesar, Alireza Sedighi, Mehdi Savaghebi, Josep
M. Guerrero, Optimal placement, sizing, and daily charge/discharge
of battery energy storage in low voltage distribution network with high
photovoltaic penetration, Applied Energy, Volume 226, 2018,Pages
957-966
[13] Y. Zhang, S. Ren, Z. Y. Dong, Y. Xu, K. Meng and Y. Zheng, "Optimal
placement of battery energy storage in distribution networks consider-
ing conservation voltage reduction and stochastic load composition,"
in IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 11, no. 15, pp.
3862-3870, 19 10 2017.
[14] J. Xiao, Z. Zhang, L. Bai and H. Liang, "Determination of the opti-
mal installation site and capacity of battery energy storage system in
distribution network integrated with distributed generation," in IET
Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 601-607,
18 2 2016, doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0130.
[15] Ling Ai Wong, Vigna K. Ramachandaramurthy, Phil Taylor, J.B.
Ekanayake, Sara L. Walker, Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban, Review on
the optimal placement, sizing and control of an energy storage sys-
tem in the distribution network, Journal of Energy Storage, Volume
21, 2019, Pages 489-504
[16] I. I. Atteya, H. Ashour, N. Fahmi and D. Strickland, "Radial dis-
tribution network reconfiguration for power losses reduction using
a modified particle swarm optimisation," in CIRED - Open Access
Proceedings Journal, vol. 2017, no. 1, pp. 2505-2508, 10 2017, doi:
10.1049/oap-cired.2017.1286.