You are on page 1of 10

JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT

(JSNA)
DEPRIVATION 2019

October 2019
Business Performance Team

Business Performance Team – October 2019


Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2019

The latest round of indices were released in September 2019. The indices measure levels of
deprivation across a number of domains at small area level – lower super output areas (LSOAs).

Overall, 88 per cent of neighbourhoods that are in the most deprived decile according to the Index of
Multiple Deprivation 2019 (IMD2019) were also the most deprived according to IMD2015. Many
London Boroughs have seen a reduction in the proportions of their neighbourhoods that are highly
deprived from the IMD2015.

Hillingdon is made up of 162 LSOAs across our 22 wards. The indices are made up of multiple domains,
ranked out of all LSOAs in England. The main domains we are usually interested in are the overall
indices, that affecting children and that affecting older people.

Each local authority will have an overall score and each LSOA will have a score; these scores are then
ranked as deciles, with a rank of 1 being the most deprived and 10 being the least deprived. Although
it is not possible to use the indices to measure changes in the absolute level of deprivation in places
over time, it is possible to explore changes in relative deprivation, or changes in the pattern of
deprivation, between iterations - as if comparing two snapshots in time.

The indices are based on the same methodology as the 2015 indices, providing a consistent suite of
outputs which are in line with previous iterations. Overall, 65% of neighbourhoods remained in the
same decile of deprivation between iterations. This indicates that, in relative terms at least, the most
deprived areas and least deprived areas have tended to remain the same between updates.

At the neighbourhood-level, the indices provide a place-based insight into deprivation. However, this
description does not apply to every person living in these areas. Many non-deprived people live in
deprived areas, and many deprived people live in non-deprived areas. It is important to note that the
indices are designed to identify and measure specific aspects of deprivation, rather than measures of
affluence.

Hillingdon Headlines

- In the overall indices, Hillingdon still has no LSOAs in the least deprived decile
- In the overall indices, 65% of our LSOAs are still ranked in the same decile as 2015 (the same
figure as nationally)
- The biggest change can be seen in the indices affecting children with 51% of Hillingdon’s LSOAs
now ranked in a less deprived decile than 2015
- For older people, 30% of Hillingdon’s LSOAs are now ranked in more deprived deciles than
2015

Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD)


Of Hillingdon’s 162 LSOAs, 106 (65%) have had no change in their rank since 2015, 32 (20%) are now
ranked in a less deprived decile and 24 (15%) are now ranked in a more deprived decile:

- 16 wards contain the LSOAs now ranked as less deprived


- 15 wards contain the LSOAs now ranked as more deprived
- All wards have seen changes in LSOAs

Hillingdon still has no LSOAs in the most deprived decile.

Business Performance Team – October 2019


Indices of deprivation affecting children and older people
f Multiple Deprivation 2019
Income Deprivation Affecting Children’s Index (IDACI)
Of our 162 LSOAs, 58 (36%) have had no change in their rank since 2015, 82 (51%) are now ranked in
a less deprived decile and 22 (13%) are now ranked in a more deprived decile:

- 21 wards contain the LSOAs now ranked as less deprived (Uxbridge South is the only ward
who doesn’t have a positive change)
- 15 wards contain the LSOAs now ranked as more deprived
- All wards have seen changes in LSOAs

Hillingdon still has 2 LSOAs in the most deprived decile (10), the same 2 from 2015 – in West Drayton
and Yeading wards.

Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI)


Of our 162 LSOAs, 96 (59%) have had no change in their rank since 2015, 17 (11%) are now ranked in
a less deprived decile and 49 (30%) are now ranked in a more deprived decile:

- 11 wards contain the LSOAs now ranked as less deprived


- 20 wards contain the LSOAs now ranked as more deprived
- All wards have seen changes in LSOAs

Hillingdon now has 6 LSOAs in the most deprived decile (10); 5 are the same as 2015 (in Townfield,
Uxbridge South and Yeading wards), and now have one in Barnhill ward that has decreased in rank
from 2 to 1.

Business Performance Team – October 2019


Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2019

Business Performance Team – October 2019


Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) 2019

Business Performance Team – October 2019


Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI) 2019

Business Performance Team – October 2019


IMD2015 IMD2019

Business Performance Team – October 2019


IDACI 2015 IDACI 2019

Business Performance Team – October 2019


IDAOPI 2015 IDAOPI 2019

Business Performance Team – October 2019


Indices of Deprivation in London

Some areas have become less deprived between the IoD2015 and IoD2019. Local authority districts in
London have seen a relative decrease in their levels of deprivation between the IMD2015 and IMD2019. In
IMD2015, eight London Boroughs were ranked in the most deprived 30 per cent of local authorities when
looking at the proportion of their neighbourhoods which were the most deprived nationally - Tower
Hamlets, Haringey, Hackney, Islington, Westminster, Enfield, Kensington & Chelsea and Waltham Forest.

In IMD2019, only three London Boroughs are ranked in the most deprived three deciles (Hackney, Haringey,
Kensington & Chelsea). Tower Hamlets has become considerably less deprived on this measure, ranking
24 in IMD2015 and 175 in IMD2019 indicating that the neighbourhoods within the authority have become
less deprived relative to other neighbourhoods in England. In IMD2015, 274 LSOAs in London were in the
most deprived decile; for IMD2019 this has reduced to 107.

Source: Office of National Statistics press release, September 2019

Business Performance Team – October 2019

You might also like