“> Central Railway C. E. (C)'s Office csTM No. EWIG41/BRN-I/CAO (C) X Date — 17/01/2019 DY CE (C) DR, GC, JNJ DY (C) PNVL, PA, ANG, MRJ.BEED DY (C) BSL, NGP, WR & BETUL Sub — Checklist for suomission of GAD ¢ waterway bridges, FOBs,ROBs, Launching scheme Ref - CBE’s letter no. WI294/BR/GAD/CIRCULAR dt. 31-12-2018 In connection with above subject a copy of CBE 's letter no. Wi294/BR/GAD/ CIRCULAR dt. 31-12-2018 is enclosed herewith for your information & necessary action please. ths \ (S. D. Kamble) Dy CE (C) DesignSr.No. BR ER CENTRAL RAILWAY HEADQUARTERS OFFICE ENGINEERING BRANCH, MUMBATC ST No. Wi24/BRIGADICIRCULAR Dale 91-12-2016 eae} ORM BB, BSL, SUR, NGP, PA ub: ~ Checklist for submission of GAD of waterway Bridges FOBs, ROBs, Launching scheme. Ref: - CRS caniral circle, Mumbai fetter no, C-8/8 (9}/2018/775 dated 20.08.2018. \With reference to the above, a check list for scrutiny on above subject is enclosed herewith, 1 is requested thal the same should be complied & accompany the GADs! Drawings submitted fer approval ofthis office. cAece) yi ) _ This is for your information and necessary action please u 5 FON DA: As above Aaa? ee (RK Goel) cece c | 8 Chief Bridge Engineer VYme Ch 4. CMDIMVG, Churchgate v1 2. MD/ MRIDC, 2nd Floor, Hoechst House, NCPA Road, Nariman Point, ‘Mumbai-400 021 3, CPM-VRVNL, CSMT & CPMAIRVNL, Pune sp CPMVDFCCIL, CSMT ‘5, St, DEN (Co) BB, BSL, SUR, PA & NGP erates apt Oy cee oaAnnexure- | (A) REVISED CHECK LIST TO BE SUBMITTED WITH GADs OF RLY BRIDGES OR EXTENSION OF BRIDGES (Ref: Commissions L. No. C-8/B (9) /2018/775 Dated 30/08/2018) (For Waterway Bridges) Teno (ORS ur. ‘Check list- General Remarks (esNo) Whether GAD has been Prepared as per Check list issued by RDSO vide letter No.CBS/DBR/IMP/Policy dated 02.11.2017? Para wise compliance of the checkiist to be Submitted. (check list is to be ensured for all Railway Bridges/F OBs/RUBS/RFo's/ROB's). Details given in Sr no 7, 8. 9& 10 ‘Whether the GAD has been prepared with key pian showing existing alignment with all features like bridges, curve etc., up to the curve/stations on both side of ROB? 1)Key Plan also to be drawn on scale up to curves or station yard or 1000 m at least on either side. 2)Railway boundary to be shown even in key plan 3) No cut lines. GA A) of RDSO Letter under item 5 General: Whether Following has been written on Right Bottom Comer? ()Name of work - to be mentioned correctly ie. Name of Railway, Division, Project, Work With location, name of Consultant etc (i) Drawing number — to be mentioned correctly. (ii) Scale - to be mentioned correctly, Size of drawing to be not less than AT, on tracing paper (to be converted to tracing cloth after execution). 1)Scale 1 :100 as a rule 2)Key Plan also to be drawn on scale up to curves or station yard or 1000 m at least on either side in case OF ROBs. this distance may be reduced to 500m or less than 500 in case of RUB or Bridges 3)Railway boundary to be shown even in key plan 4) No cut lines. (jv) Name and Signature — The name and signature of all official Involved in preparation of GAD fo be written clearly and to be signed with date. For construction organization works, name and signature of divisional officer also. Provision to be made for signature of Head Quarter officials. (Item no, 2) Names are often missing and Signatures are often without date. (v) Reference- Reference of PBlothers, item no. with name of sanctioned work fo be ‘mentioned clearly. GA 8) of RDSO Letter under stem 5 Notes: Notes (To be written on the right side of plan) {)Dimensions-To be Written Clearly (Preferably in mm and levels in meter) The Font Size Should be reasonably big and easily readable. (i) Colour-Whether the Color of Existing Work and Proposed Work has been Indicated? 1)All proposed works in RED 2) Existing in Black. § ————— 3) Works to be dismantled in black dotted. 4) Proposed lines or works in red | ——— 5) Future work red dotted = 8) temporary work: in magenta § ———— 7) Works to be done by open line and const org/RVNL (Emerald green) etc, to be in aiff color. (iil) Directions —Whether North directions has been shown in the Plan? ‘To be shown on Top Right Corner ‘ONLY’ (jv) Whether Plan section and elevation to be as per scale? Scale to be Mentioned. Scale should be checked to be correct. No Shrinkage Command Pl (w) Whether Direction to Field Engineers has been Incorporated (Direction to field Engineers before execution should be mentioned clearly i.e. verification of various: levels including rail level, Formation level, HFL, MAX Observed Scour level on Up‘stream, foundation level, bore Log data, type of Soil, Bearing capacity etc. Clear directions in case there is apprehension of damage to nearby Structure etc) (vi) Co-ordination —Clear direction to executive department to consul finlimale to ‘other concerned departments. Clear responsibility of other executive departments to be defined for Consultation ‘intimation to other departments. (vil) Traffic diversion —in case of traffic diversion during execution, the same to be mentioned with details like chain age of takeoff points on both the ends etc. Division should show and ensure. (vil) Speed restriction -Clear mention of Speed restriction to be followed before! during and after the execution (o) Reference Drawings-the drawings to be referred for detailing to be mentioned clearly. ‘The drawings to be referred for detailing to be mentioned clearly. Inspection facilities, Structural Drawings. Type plans such as rain water harvesting, RCC Hume pipe, Height gauge etc. (x) Miscellaneous details- Miscellaneous details like Skin reinforcement, no Plastering/Cement wash, dry stone Pitching, weep holes, backfill, inspection platform, pedestal, trolley refuges, OHE mest, safety measures, service cables, launching scheme, protective Coating to reinforcement & Concrete, station names with their MSL, railway boundary, Modus-operandi etc. to be mentioned in the notes itself. (x) Codes and specification - Reference of Railway codes, Bridges rules, IS Codes, IRC Codes with their preferential order and specification to be followed and Should be clearly mentioned. List of IRS codes- i) Steel bridge code (Il) Concrete bridge code(ii) Bridges cules (iv) Substructure and Foundation code(v) Arch Bridge code (vi) Code for well foundation and pile foundation (vi) pipe bridge code (vii) welded bridge code (ix) IRS-B-1/2000 for steel fabrication (x) 8S110R — inspection of steel bridge girders (xi) BS-112 guidelines for avoiding skew Bridges (xii) BS-113 Guidelines for providing inspection {acilties.(xii) Schedule of dimensions (Xiv) BS-105- Pipe line crossings (xi)Technical Details ~Whether GAD Contains all technical details (all technical aia used for reference in Preparation of GAD to be Written in @ Tabular form like latitude/fongitude, track on single/double line, bridges on UP line or DN line, grade, rail level ,formation level on approaches HFL, LWL, Bed Level, free board, vertical Clearance, lineer water-way, standard of loading, type of super ~Structure, type of bearing, type of sub-Structure, type of foundation, design discharge, catchment area, seismic Zone wind Zone ,Sub ~Zone for water-way Calculation, exposure Condition, Clear Cover to reinforcement, provision of guard raifs, track on Straight or on Curve any RAT/RAW within 50 km’on upstream etc. All reduced levels to be mentioned Wart MSL) 10 (ji) Details of existing bridge- Whether details of Existing Bridge if any has been incorporated? (details of existing rail Bridge /road to be written in @ tabular form i.e. existing bridge no, location, span, type of Sub- structureffoundation, distance from existing bridge, rail level, formation level, any major incident happened to these bridges in past etc.) (xivDetails of Trial pitf bore log- Whether details of tial pibore log have been’ incorporated? - (the details of location with chainage, reduced level at top of trial pit/bore log, SBC value for each Stratum to be shown in a tabular form). Bore log details to be shown near the pier/Abutment in elevation and pian. (0) Alteration-Alferation should be clearly mentioned with the name and signature with date of official concemed. Alteration should be mention in St numberwise at one place and also shoen in drawings. 17 ()Details of trial pitfbore log-RDSO check list 5.18(xiv) (ii) Whether Soil Classification as per IS code has been Made in the bore log details? Not like red soil, yellow soil & black soil. Table of IS classification of soil enclosed, (iii) Whether GPS location of the bore log has been given?12 ‘Whether the arrangements for protection of worksite as per provisions of Chapter 8 of IRPWM and Railway Board instructions clearly indicated on plan? Protection of short duration and long duration. ey ‘Whether the drainage arrangements have been clearly indicated on plan ensuring that there will be no incidence of water fall on or near running track below? ‘Type pian reference or Typical details to be shown 14 ‘Super-Structure: for Selecting the type of Super-structure, Whether Board's guidelines followed if not, whether Board's approval has been taken. C Rly. Nonstandard or Standard RDSO Spans should be used as far as possible. 5 In case, non-Standard RDSO Spans have been Proposed to be used, whether reasons for the same has been recorded and are to the satisfaction of CBE? Whether @ maintenance manual has been developed giving guidelines to field engineers for Non-RDSO Spans. Valid for non- conventional special type of Structures 19 (Whether most economical option has been considered in selection of spans? Proper and adequate justification for Selection of Span to be Mentioned, (Whether overall length is more than existing bridge/water course? If so the reasons there of. Whether overall length 1s less than existing bridges (water course? If so the reasons there of. Approval of CBE is necessary. Maximum reduction is 20 %. (iv) Whether design discharges have been caloulatediprovided as per Code. Whether discharge due to RAT/RAW in upstream has been taken into account? Divisions are usually not checking this aspect. Care to be exercised, (¥) Whether free bored and vertical clearance has been provided as per Codal Provisions? Free board depends on Discharge. Bridge Manual’ Clause 4.9 & 4.8 of Sub Str code. i) Wheiher Proposed water way been Provide as per codal Provisions? Refer: RDSO Guide line RBF -16. (vi) Whether maximum scour depth below HFL at pier and abutment has been Considered as per Codal Provisions? Lacey Formulae for alluvial soil, Or Experience of existing bridges nearby for doubiing projects, (vii)Whether Size of Pier Jabuiment cap has been Provided as per code including inspection arrangements? (ix) Whether safe Bearing capacity has been calculated by appropriate method? Soil testing Report. Table Assessment as per Table -6 of Sub structure code. (%) In case of pile foundation, whether pile cap level including scour depth has been calculated /provided as per codes? ‘Top of pile cap should not be above Lowest water level For FOB / ROB itis to be decided as per site condition, Should not be high to infringe at the same time take care of safety of execution. (x) In case well foundation, whether provisions including Scour depth has been Calculatediprovided as per Codes? GAD must indicate a note in this regard (xi) Whether distance between existing and proposed bridge has been adequately provided? This has to be considered with respect of the approved project sheet. If the project, sheet specifies lesser distance, it will require revision, (Qi) Whether location of proposed piers and abutments are in the line of existing bridge? if not, the reasons there of. It has to be in alignment in all cases, (xiv) Whether GAD has been prepared with half plan at bottom with longitudinal section, sectional elevation and key plan? It has to be drawn along the length with half bottom plan at the level of top of foundation and half top at the top of pier cap.(ev) Whether the dimensions of plan, elevation, cross section, longitudinal section are matching? Itis mandatory to have the same scale of plan, elevation and cross section. The elevation should be above the plan with perfect alignment. The cross section should be on the RHS of elevation. In case of old bridge being extended, the cross section of existing bridge must be shown on the side or overlapping with diminished font (vi) Whether backfill material behind abutments, wing walls, RCC boxes efe. has been Shown? RDSO type plan no.-10152 -10159 to be referred. As per RDSO letter no. CBS/DBC dated 19.03.18 Approach slab and transition system as per RDSO Geo Tech Die. report. (Gai) Whether weep holes have been provided adequately? Anote in this regard to be added. Clause 7.6.1 and 7.6.2 of Sub Structure Code. (xvii) Whether flooring details with curtain wall/drop well! apron have been shown with cross-section, in case of box bridges? RDSO Type pian no. ROSO/B-10152 (xis) Whether bearings have been provided es per requirement and details shown correctly? Type of Bearings proposed to be indicated along with source of supply. (x) Whether proper facilities for inspection like inspection ladder, steps, inspection platform have been provided? If not, the reasons thereof. Mandatory. RDSO Guideline B-113, ‘Gxxi) Whether trolley refuges/man refuges have been provided as per guidelines? RDSO Standard Drawing/ plan and Letters to be referred. ‘Gaxil) Whether reference of separate drawings like protection work, pitching ete, Has been mentioned at adequate place? Reference is to be given instead of spoiling the drawing by complete painting. ‘oiii) Whether important reference drawings mentioned in the GAD have been attached with the application? Reference Drawings should be available on C R web sile and site should be kept updated. (xxiv) Whether direction of flow has been confirmed from site and shown correctly in the plan? ADEN/DENs should examine this aspect while putting their signatures, 20 Whether river training works required? If so, whether these have been provided as per bridge manual? Applicable for major and important bridges Para 808 of Bridge manual isto be referred a Ih case of jacketing of abuimeni/ pier, whether the decreased waterway is more than the required waterway? This should be certified by a suitable note in the drawing. Jacketing should be done as ROSO/ C Rly type plan. Reduction up to 20 % can be approved by CBE 22 ‘Whether the stipulations regarding speed restriction, traffic and power block etc. Have been firmed up and indicated in GAD? ‘The traffic block and Caution order requirement to be shown in tabular form 24 In case of electrified sections, whether OHE arrangement on superstructure of bridges and RFO has been planned as per ROSO siandard arrangement? IF non- standard arrangement has been proposed, whether the same has been checked and certified? Whether 100% standby arrangement for OHE mast has been planned on piers? Sr, DEE/TRD and Sr DEN should examine this aspect while signing the GAD. 2 ‘For ROB/RFO/Railway bridges, whether a Copy of approved alignment plans up to Adjacent stations/Curve on both sides has been Submitted for better appreciation? ‘The approved project sheet should be sent along with and the reference of the same should be in the notes.26 | Tn case of Railway brides for Doubling/Gauge Conversion, ()\Whether safety of existing structure and bank has been construction/extension is safe? Details of foundations of existing bridge must be plotted by the side of proposed foundation. Protection arrangements should be indicated in the GAD for safety of track and operations. (i) Whether hydrological investigation has been carried out? (note: hydrological investigation should invariably be carried out for all projects of new line and even the brides in doubling, GC projects). Pertains to Construction Organization. Dy CE/C/ Design to look into, (ii) Whether completion drawings of the existing bridges have been submitted? All completion plans to be available with Division. Sr DENs to ensure, (jv) Whether there is any inconsistency in the proposed work w,r.t completion drawing of existing bridge? ‘Any inconsistency should be brought out in the GAD itself, if there is any. {v) Whether the bridges have been checked and certified for design loading indicates in the drawing? Calculation sheets should be submitted and reference of the same to be given in notes, (viwhether the alignment of the projects has been finalized and approved by open tine and 2 copy of entire alignment of the project has been submitted to commission with application or with any of the application sent earlier (reference may be given)? Pertains to Construction Organization. A certificate to be given in Notes. (vil) Whether soft copy of the alignments of the projects has been submitted to commission? Pertains to Construction Organization. A certificate to be given in Notes (vii) Whether in case of existing arch bridge, load testing has been done for the proposed loading to ceriify its fitness for the proposed loading (generally 25 T)? Pertains to Construction organization. A certificate to be given in Notes. (ix) Whether the load of the new line is coming on the oxisting bridge has been certified for proposed new loading (generally 25T).. Calculation sheets should be submitted with certificate and reference of the same to be given in notes. 31 | Whether the designs of substructure and superstructure have been checked and certified? (CBE should call design basis, design calculation duly proof checked by IIT as required before certification. He should ensure that all relevant loadings have been taken into consideration and the instructions given in advanced correction slip No.48, Bridge Rules dated 28.08.2017 have been complied, especially para 2.16.4.2 to 2.16.4.3.3. CBE should also check and satisty that the bearing capacity considered in design of foundation has been correctly assessed as per stipulated procedure.) Design basis note should be approved in advance before taking up the design work Standard Performa for certificates from Designer! Proof Consultants IT) third party consultant and client has been circulated. Same should be given. 32 | Whether method for inspection and maintenance including bearings has been laid down during launching and during service? This is mainly applicable to spans of track crossings/ROBS/RFO by NHAUMETRO/MRIDC/MSRDC/MCGM/TMCIPWDIMRVC etc. 33__| (Whether fabrication work is being done at RDSO approved workshop or Railway workshop? (ii) Whether the work is being carried out under RDSO supervision and as per RDSO standard procedure? Name of RDSO approved Workshop of fabrication to be advised in GAD 28 _{ Tf, for replacement of any component like bearing étc, During service requires special equipment like special jacks, then whether availability of the same with the maintenance agency has been ensured? Applicable to important track crossings of NHSRC/Metro etc,Annexure-| (B) REVISED CHECK LIST TO BE SUBMITTED WITH GADs OF FOOT OVER BRIDGE (Ref: Commissions L. No. C-B/B (9) /2018/775 Dated 30/08/2018} For FOOT OVER BRIDGES Item of | Check list- General Remarks CRS Ltr. {Yesitto) 5 | Whether GAD has been Prepared as per Check list issued by RDSO vide letter No.CBS/DBR/IMPIPolicy dated 02.11.2017? Para wise compliance of the checklist to be Submitted. (check list is to be ensured for all Railway Bridges/FOBs/RUBs/RFo's/ROB's). Details given in Sr no 7, 8, 9 & 10 Whether the GAD has been prepared with key plan showing existing alignment with all features like bridges, curve etc., up to the curvelstations on both side of ROB? 6 | 1)Key Plan also to be drawn on scale up to curves of station yard or 1000 m at least on either side. 2)Rallway boundary to be shown even in key plan 3) No cut lines, 7 | General: Whether Following has been written on Right Botiom Comer? (5.14) [()Name of work - to be mentioned correctly i.e. Name of Railway, Division, of | Project, Work With location, name of Consultant etc vt (ii) Drawing number — to be mentioned correctly. under_| Lill Scale - fo be mentioned correctly, Size of drawing to be not less then Aq, fan's | on tracing paper (to be converted to tracing cloth after execution). 1)Scale 1 :100 as a rule 2)Key Plan also to be drawn on scale up to curves or station yard or 1000 m at least on either side in case OF ROBs. this distance may be reduced to 500m or less than 500 in case of RUB or Bridges 3)Railway boundary to be shown even in key plan 4) No cut lines. (iv) Name and Signature — The name and signature of all official involved in preparation of GAD to be written clearly and to be signed with date. For ‘construction organization works, name and signature of divisional officer also, Provision to be made for signature of Head Quarter officials. (Item no, 2) Nathes are often missing and | Signatures are often without date. (v) Reference- Reference of PB/others, item no. with name of sanctioned work to be mentioned clearly. @ | Notes: Notes (To be written on the right side of plan) ()Dimensions-To be Written Clearly (Preferably in mm and levels in meter) (64.8) | The Font Size Should be reasonably big and easly readable. (i) Colour-Whether the Color of Existing Work and Proposed Work has been ROSO | indicated? teller | 1)All proposed works ander | 2) Exsting in Black 3) Works to be dismantled in black dotted 4) Proposed lines or works in red 5) Future work red dotted 8) temporary work- in magenta. 7) Works to be done by open line and const orgIRVNL (Emerald green) etc. to be in diff color. in RED i) Directions ~Whether North directions has been shown in the Plan? ‘To be shown on Top Right Comer ‘ONLY’, (iv) Whether Plan section and elevation to be a8 per scale? Scale to be Mentioned. Scale should be checked to be correct No Shrinkage Command Pl(v) Whether Direction to Field Engineers has been Incorporated (Direction to field Engineers before execution should be mentioned clearly ie. verification of various levels including rail level, Formation level, HFL, MAX Observed Scour level on Up stream, foundation level, bore Log data, type of Soil, Bearing capacity etc. Clear directions 'in case there is apprehension of damage to nearby Structure etc) (vi) Co-ordination —Clear direction to executive department to consult Jintimate to other concemed departments. Clear responsibility of other executive departments to be defined for Consultation /intimation to other departments. (vil) Traffic diversion —in case of traffic diversion during execution, the same to be mentioned with details like chain age of takeoff points on both the ends ete. Division should show and ensure. (vil) Speed restriction —Clear mention of Speed restriction to be followed before’ during and after the execution (b) Reference Drawings-the drawings to be referred for detailing to be mentioned clearly. ‘The drawings to be referred for detailing to be mentioned clearly. Inspection facilites. Structural Drawings, Type plans such as rain water harvesting, RCC Hume pipe, Height gauge etc. (x) Miscellaneous details- Miscellaneous details like Skin reinforcement, no Plastering/Cement wash, dry stone Pitching, weep holes, backiil, inspection platform, pedestal, trolley refuges, OHE mast, safety measures, service cables, launching scheme, protective Coating to reinforcement & Concrete, station names with their MSL, railway boundary, Modus-operandi ete. to be mentioned in the notes itself. (x) Codes and specification - Reference of Railway codes, Bridges rules, IS Codes, IRC Codes with their preferential order and specification to be followed and Should be clearly mentioned. List of IRS codes- i) Steel bridge code (II) Concrete bridge code(ii) Bridges rules (iv) Substructure and Foundation code(v) Arch Bridge code (vi) Gode for well foundation and pile foundation (vii) pipe bridge code (vii) welded bridge code (ix) IRS-B-1/2000 for stee! fabrication (x) BS110R — inspection of stee! bridge girders (xi) BS-112 guidelines for avoiding skew Bridges (xii) BS-113 | Guidelines for providing inspection facilities.(xii) Schedule of dimensions (xiv) BS-105- Pipe line crossings (618) of RDSO Letter ‘under item 5) (xijTechnical Details —Whether GAD Contains all technical details 7(ell ‘echnical data used for reference in Preparation of GAD to be Written in a Tabular form like latitude/longitude, treck on single/double line, bridges on UP line or DN line, grade, rail level formation level on approaches HFL, LWL, Bed Level, free board, vertical Clearance, linear water-way, standard of loading, type of super Structure, type of bearing, type of sub-Structure, type of foundation, design discharge, catchment area, seismic Zone ,wind Zone Sub ~Zone for water-way Calculation, exposure Condition, Clear Cover to reinforcement, provision of guard rails, track on Straight or on Curve any RATIRAW within 50 km on upstream etc. All reduced levels to be mentioned Wark MSL) 10 (il) Details of existing bridge- Whether details of Existing Bridge if any has been incorporated? (deteils of existing rail Bridge /road to be written in a tabular form i.e. existing bridge no, location, span, type of Sub- structure/foundation, distance from existing bridge, rail level, formation level, any major incident happened to these bridges in past etc.) (xiv)Detalls of Trial pit bore log- Whether details of trial pitbore log have been incorporated? - (the details of location with chainage, reduced level at top of trial pitbore log, SBC valve for each Stratum to be shown in a tabular form). Bore log details to be shown near the pier/Abutment in elevation and olan. (xv) Alteration-Alteration should be clearly mentioned with the name andSignature with date of official concemed, Alteration should be mention in Sr numberwise at one place and also shown in drawings. 17 (Details of trial pivbore log-RDSO check list 5. 1B(xiv) (ii) Whether Soil Classification as per |S code has been Made in the bore log details? Not like red soil, yellow soil & black soil. Table of IS classification of soil enclosed (ii) Whether GPS location of the bore log has been given? 2 ‘Whether the arrangements for protection of worksite as per provisions of Chapter 8 of IRPWM and Railway Board instructions clearly indicated on plan? Protection of short duration and long duration acy Whether the drainage arrangements have been clearly indicated on plan ‘ensuring that there will be no incidence of water fall on of near running track below? Type plan reference or Typical details to be shown, In case, non-Standard RDSO Spans have been Proposed to be used, whether reasons for the same has been recorded and are to the satisfaction of CBE? whether a maintenance manual has been developed giving guidelines to field ‘engineers for Non-RDSO Spans. Valid justifications 18 (i) Whether a maintenance agreement/MOU has been drawn and signed, clearly specifying the responsibilities, methodology? (i) Whether a copy of MOU has been attached? 2 Whether the stipulations regarding speed restriction, traffic and power block etc, Have been firmed up and indicated in GAD? ‘The traffic block and Caution order requirement to be shown in tabular form. 34 Whether the desions of substructure and supersiructure have been checked and certified? (CBE should call design basis, design calcutation duly proof checked by IIT as required before certification. He should ensure’ that all relevant loadings have been taken into consideration and the instructions given in advanced correction slip No.48, Bridge Rules dated 28.06.2017 have been complied, especially para 2.16.42 to 2.16.4.3.3. CBE should also check and satisfy that the bearing capacity considered in design of foundation has been correctly assessed as per stipulated procedure.) Design basis note should be approved in advance before taking up the design work Standard Performa for certificates {rom Designer’ Proof Consultants /IT/ third party consultant and client has been circulated. Same should be given. 32 ‘Whether method for inspection and maintenance including bearings has been laid down during launching and during service? This is mainly applicable to spans of track crossings/ROBSIRFO by NHAW/METRO/MRIDC/MSRDC/MCGM/TMCIPWDIMRVC etc. (Whether fabrication work is being done at RDSO approved workshop or Railway workshop? Gi) Whether the work is being carried out under RDSO supervision and as per RDSO standard procedure? Name of RDSO approved Workshop of fabrication to be, advised in GAD. (a) Whether fabrication work is being done at RDSO approved workshop or Railway workshop or the workshop approved by CBE/CE (Con)? Name of ROSO approved Workshop of fabrication to be advised in GAD. (b) Whether the fabrication work is being carried out with submerged Arc welding or superior welding has been ensured? Welding technique may be mentioned.Submerged Arc Welding (© Whether fabrication drawings have been prepared and approved by competent authority? To be prepared by Fabricating workdhop (@ Whether splices and joints are as per the approved fabrication drawings? To be done as per BS 110R by inspecting agency eg. RITES. (e} Whether HSFG bolts with DT! washers as per approved designs have been used? BS-111(Rev-3) to be ensured () Whether steel has been procured from approved source? Mention the source name {g) Whether WPS and WPQR have been approved by competent authority? a8 If, for replacement of any component like bearing etc. During service requires ‘special equipment like special jacks, then whether availability of the same with the maintenance agency has been ensured? Applicable to important track crossings of NHSRC/Metro eteAnnexure-l(C) REVISED CHECK LIST TO BE SUBMITTED WITH GADs OF ROBs/RUBs/IRFOs (Ref: Commissions L. No. C-8/B (9) /2018/775 Dtd 30/08/2018) For RUBS/ROBs/RFOs Remar ist coma [Jeno | Check list- General ree 5 | Whether GAD has been Prepared as per Check fist issued by RDSO vide letter No.CBS/DBRIMP/Policy dated 02.11.2017? Para wise compliance of the checklist to be Submited. (check list is to be ensured for all Railway Bridges/FOBs/RUBs/RFo's/ROB's). Details given in Sr no 7. 8, 9 & 10 Whether the GAD has been prepared with key plan showing existing alignment With all features like bridges, curve etc., up to the curve/stations on both side of ROB? 6 | 1)Key Pien also to be drawn on scale up to curves or station yard or 1000 m at least on either side. 2)Reilway boundary to be shown even in key plan 3) No cut lines 7 | General: Whether Following has been written on Right Bottom Gomer? ()Name of work - to be mentioned correctly ie. Name of Railway, Division, Project, Work With Iocation, name of Consultant etc (i) Drawing number — to be mentioned correctly. {il Seale - to be mentioned correctly, Size of drawing to be not less than AT, on tracing paper (to be converted to tracing cloth after execution). 1)Scale 1 :100 as a rule 2)Key Pian also to be drawn on scale up to curves or station yard or 1000 m at least on either side in case OF ROBs. this distance may be reduced to 500m or {ess than 500 in case of RUB or Bridges 3)Rallway boundary to be shown even in key plan 4) No cut lines. {iv) Name and Signature — The name and signature of all official involved in preparation of GAD to be written clearly and to be signed with date. For construction organization works, name and signature of divisional officer also. Provision io be made for signature of Head Quarter officials. (Item no. 2) Names are often missing and | Signatures are often without date. (v) Reference- Reference of PB/oihers, fem no. with name of sanctioned work to be mentioned clearly. 8 GAA) of oso Letter under item 5) Notes: Notes (To be written on the right side of plan) ()Dimensions-To be Written Clearly (Preferably in mm and levels in meter) The Font Size Should be reasonably big and easily readable. (i) Colour-Whether the Color of Existing Work and Proposed Work has been Indicated? ‘)All proposed works in RED 2) Existing in Black 3) Works to be dismantled in biack dotted. 4) Proposed lines or works in red — 5) Future work red dotted 6) temporary work- in magenta ————— 7) Works to be done by open line and const org/RVNL (Emerald green) etc, to be in dif color. Directions -Whether North directions has been shown in the Plan? ‘To be shown on Top Right Comer ‘ONLY’, (iv) Whether Pian section and elevation to be as per scale? Scale to be Mentioned. Scale should be checked to be correct. No Shrinkage Command P1cons (v) Whether Direction to Field Engineers has been Incorporated (Direction io field Engineers before execution should be mentioned clearly i.e. verification of various levels including rail level, Formation level, HFL, MAX Observed Scour level.on Up stream, foundation level, bore Log data, type of Soil, Bearing capacity case there is apprehension of damage to nearby Structure (vi) Co-ordination —Ciear direction to executive depariment to consult fintimate to other concemed departments. Clear responsibilty of other executive departments to be defined for Consultation Jintimation to other departments. Traffic diversion —in case of traffic diversion during execution, the same to be mentioned with details like chain age of takeoff points on both the ends etc. Division should show and ensure. (vil) Speed restriction —Clear mention of Speed restriction to be followed before! during and after the execution (x) Reference Drawings-the drawings to be referred for detailing to be mentioned clearly The drawings to be referred for detailing to be mentioned clearly Inspection facilities. Structural Drawings Type plans such as rain water harvesting, RCC Hume pipe, Height gauge etc. (&) Miscellaneous details- Miscellaneous details ike Skin reinforcement, no Plastering/Cement wash, dry stone Pitching, weep holes, backfill, inspection platform, pedestal, trolley refuges, OHE mast, safely measures, service cables, launching scheme, protective Coating to reinforcement & Concrete, station names with their MSL, railway boundary, Modus-operandi etc, to be mentioned in the notes itself. (xi) Codes and specification - Reference of Railway codes, Bridges rules, 1S Codes, IRC Codes with their preferential order and specification to be followed and Should be clearly mentioned. List of IRS codes- i) Steel bridge code (Il) Concrete bridge code(il) Bridges rules (iv) Substructure and Foundation code(v) Arch Bridge code (vi) Code for well foundation and pite foundation (vii) pipe bridge code (vil) welded bridge code (ix) IRS-B-1/2000 for ste! fabrication (x) BS110R — inspection of stee! bridge girders (x) BS-112 guidelines for avoiding skew Bridges (xi) BS-113 Guidelines for providing inspection facilities. (xii) Schedule of dimensions (Xiv) BS-105- Pipe line crossings (1B) of DSO Letter under tiem 5} (xi)Technical Details Whether GAD Contains all technical details (all technical data used for reference in Preparation of GAD to be Written in a Tabular form like latitude/longitude, track on single/double line, bridges on UP line or DN line, grade, rail level ,formation level on approaches HFL, LWL, Bed Level, free board, vertical Clearance, linear weter-way, standard of loading, type of super -Structure, type of bearing, type of sub-Structure, type of foundation, design discharge, catchment area, seismic Zone ,wind Zone Sub ~Zone for waterway Calculation, exposure ‘Condition, Clear Cover to reinforcement, provision of guard rails, track on Straight or on Curve any RATIRAW within 50 kr on upstream etc. All reduced levels to be mentioned W.r.t MSL) 0 (iil) Details of existing bridge- Whether details of Existing Bridge if any has been incorporated? (details of existing rail Bridge /road to be written in a tabular form i.e. existing bridge no, location, span, type of Sub- structure/foundation, distance from existing bridge, rail level, formation level, any major incident happened to these bridges in past etc.) (xiv)Details of Trial pit/ bore log- Whether details of tral pitibore log have been incorporated? - (the details of location with chainage, reduced level at top of trial pifbore log, SBC value for each Stratum to be shown in a tabular form), Bore log details to be shown near the pier/Abutment in elevation and plan. (av) Alteration-Alteration should be clearly mentioned with the name and signature with date of official concemed. Alteration should be mention in Sr numberwise at one place and also shoen intis mandatory. ‘Whether the stipulations regarding speed restricion, traffic and power block etc. Have been firmed up and indicated in GAD? The traffic block and Caution order requirement to be shown in tabular form Whether the stipulation regarding closure of LC or otherwise has been clearly made in GAD for ROBs/RUBs? Closure or deposit work 24 Th case of electrified sections, whether OHE arrangement on superstructure of bridges and RFO has been planned as per RDSO standard arrangement? If non- ‘standard arrangement has been proposed, whether the same has been checked and certified? Whether 100% standby arrangement for OHE mast has been planned on piers? Sr. DEE/TRD and Sr DEN should examine this aspect while signing the GAD. For ROB/RFO/Railway bridges, whether a Copy of approved alignment plans up to Adjacent stations/Curve on both sides has been Submitted for better appreciation? The approved project sheet should be sent along with and the reference of the same should be in the notes. 27 Tn ease temporary arrangements is proposed whether the detailed design and drawing has been submitted by the executing agency to CBE and have been checked and certified by CBE. Design of sling, its location of lifting, lifting capacity with respect to the holding angle of sling, length etc, should be designed w rt the stress diagram. a Whether the designs of substructure and superstructure have been checked and cerlified? (CBE should call design basis, design calculation duly proof checked by IIT as required before certification. He should ensure that all relevant loadings have been taken into consideration and the instructions given in advanced lip No.48, Bridge Rules dated 28.06.2017 have been complied, especially para 2.16.4.2 to 2.16.4.3.3. CBE should also check and satisfy that the ‘bearing capacity considered in design of foundation has been correctly assessed as per stipulated procedure.) Design basis note should be approved in advance before taking up the design work Standard Performa for certificates trom Designer! Proof Consultants /MIT! third party consultant and client has been circulated. Same should be given. a ‘Whether method for inspection and maintenance including bearings has been laid down during launching and during service? This is mainly applicable to spans of track crossings/ROBS/RFO by NHAW/METRO/MRIDC/MSROC/MCGM/TMC/PWD/MRVC etc. 3 (Whether fabrication work is being done at RDSO. approved workshop or Railway workshop? (i) Whether the work is being carried out under ROSO supervision and as per RDSO standard procedure? Name of RDSO approved Workshop of fabrication to be advised in GAD. cry If, for replacement of any component like beating ele. During service requires special equipment like special jacks, then whether availability of the same with the maintenance agency has been ensured? Applicable to important track crossings of NHSRC/Metro etc.Annexure-| (D) REVISED CHECK LIST FOR WITH TADs OF GIRDER LAUNCHING & DISMANTLING (Ref: Commissions L. No. C-8/B (9) /2018/775 Dated 30/08/2018) For LAUNCHING SCHEME. Tom oF RS Ltr, ‘Check list- General Remarks (Yes/No) a In case temporary arrangements is proposed whether the detailed design and drawing has been submitted by the executing agency to CBE and have been checked and certified by CBE. Design of siing, its location of lifting, lifting capacity with respect to the holding angle of sling, length etc. should be designed w r t the stress diagram. 28 ‘Whether launching scheme has been approved by CBE? (As per correction slip no. 36 dated 27-03-2018 to IRBM the launching scheme of all ROB/RUB/Railway Bridges/FOBs/RFOs etc are required to be approved by CBE, CBE while approving launching scheme shall ensure all items of the checklist and certify. Only approved TAD to be attached 28 ‘Whether the launching scheme has been checked and approved? (While approving the scheme all the aspects like design, method statements, risk assessment, safety, QAP, stand-by arrangements, restoration in case of emergency, arrangement of mock trials on approaches etc should be called by CBE from the executing agency and checked). A separate descriptive note to be attached. Sample is attached. 30 (Nole: Since the work generally involves multi-stage operations, @ general method statement needs to be developed by the executing agency which can be further developed to more detailed and specific method statement. These statements will invariably require diagrammatic as well as descriptive notes covering the erection sequence for each span and hightighting the stress required at all stages, certified by the independent checking authority like proof consultant and IIT. CBE should insist for method statement on the above lines before approving the launching scheme. A risk assessment analysis is required to be done by the executing agency and all measures neads to be taken to ensure safe launching). Method Statement with activities identified with risk assessment to be submitted separately. Safety precautions and steps proposed for mitigation of risk to be clearly stated. Whether the method statement has been checked and verified by CBE and whether it includes: (i) Risk assessment and all measures for avoiding or mitigating the hazards identified in the risk assessment have been made. (i) Step by step procedures supplemented with diagrammatic illustrations. (ii) Safety procedures and instructions. (iv) Procedures for avoiding hazards to personnel working adjacent to the operations. (v) Method to ensure all necessary test and examination certificates. (vi) Operational and maintenance manual(s) and any other relevant documents. (vil) Checking and confirmation of the strength and stability during and after erection. (vill) Provision of properly trained and competent personnel. (ix) Means to observe for any unsafe conditions. (x) Contingency plans and procedures to be followed in case of emergency situations assessed in risk assessment. (xi) Method of replacement of bearing after their service life. (xi) Material statement with source and make of equipment with test certificates has been submitted and are of standard make and proven service. The critical materials like welding equipment; certified welders, rollers, Bearings, bullies, winch etc, Mostly applicable for Big works of Girder Launching for Track Crossings/ROBs 35 Whether the strength and stabilly of girders have been checked for stresses during and after erection at every stage? Certificate to be given in TAD after checking. ET Whether provision for 100% reserve machinery tools and plants has been made todrawings. 7 ()Details of trial pivbore log-RDSO check list 5. 1Btxiv) (i) Whether Soil Classification as per IS code has been Made in the bore log details? Not like red soil, yellow soil & black soil. Table of IS classification of soil enclosed. )) Whether GPS location of the bore log has been given? 2 ‘Whether the arrangements for protection of worksite as per provisions of Chapter 8 of IRPWM and Rallway Board instructions clearly indicated on plan? Protection of short duration and long duration. 3 Whether the drainage arrangements have been clearly indicated on plan ensuring that there will be no incidence of water fall on or near running track below? Type plan reference or Typical details to be shown, 4 ‘Super-Structure: for Selecting the type of Super-structure, Whether Board's guidelines followed if not, whether Board's approval has been taken C Rly, Nonstandard or Standard RDSO Spans should be used as far as possible. 5 In case, non-Standatd RDSO Spans have been Proposed to be used, whether reasons for the same has been recorded and are to the satisfaction of CBE? ‘Whether a maintenance manual has been developed giving guidelines to field engineers for Non-RDSO Spans. \Valid for non- conventional special type of Structures 16 Whether all the clearances required as per IRSOD particularly para 7, 8, 10 & 11 of chapter-1 have been clearly indicated on plan. In case of ROB/RFO, (i) Whether there is any sanctioned work/survey of additional line(s) under the ROB/RFO is adequate to accommodate the additional line(s) with proposed track centres. in such a case, the No objection is to be taken on plan from all such concerned authorities. (id Whether the approaches of ROB/RFO have at least one span on both side(s) as viaduct? If not, whether itis due to constraints or due to other reason? Details should be brought out. (ii) Whether the structure is at 90 degrees to the track alignment or at skew angle? If-skew, the angle of skew may be indicated Effort should be made to keep the skew less than 20 degree to enable use of RDSO standard spans for superstructure. (iv) Width of the land strip at the location of ROB/RUB. (m) (v) Whether pier(s) or abutment(s) fall on the Railway land fully or partly? If yes, whether attempt has been made to keep Railway land free for future expansion to the extent possible? Whether the piers have been proposed parallel to Rly Track? 18 (@ Whether a maintenance agreement/MOU has been drawn and signed, clearly specifying the responsibilities, methodology? Different maintenance agreement for NHAlLetter no.2015/CE-IV/ROB/78(pt) dated 12.01.2018, METROLetter no. 201 1/Proj /SCR/9/8 dated 22.03.2012 & 13.08.2013, STATE GOVT. Letter no. 2008/CE-I/BRO/1(Policy) dated 11.08.2008, DEPOSIT WORKLetter no. 2006/CE-//BRO/1 dated 04.01.2006 BOT WorksLetter no. 98/CE-I/Misc./14(BRO) dated 30.12.1998. (i) Whether a copy of MOU has been attached? ©)cater for failure during the launching? Stand by arrangements of adequate capacity and sufficient numbers to be mentioned in GAD. 7 ‘Whether required medical team has been ensured at site fo cater any emergency for working personnel? Whether all safety, Health and Environment protection plan has been submitted and required measures have been ensured? Certificate of having sufficient medical arrangements including ambulance should be given in TAD. The details of hospitaVambulance provider to be given in risk assessment document. 38 Whether the launching scheme has detailed descriptive note about sequence of operation, requirement of speed restriction, traffic and power blocks etc? Whether the scheme requires road/rail traffic diversion plan during construction of ROB/RFO? If so, whether the same has been prepared and exemined and bears the approval of competent authority? Diversion plan to be submitted along with TAD if the same is required for launching 39 ‘Whether there is any inconsistency in the GAD, launching scheme, modus operandi etc? (CBE to examine that in case of any change of scheme at later stage, suitable amendment has been issued to GAD or any other relevant approved drawing). To be checked carefully at Divisional level 40 ‘Whether the crane working arrangement clearly indicates the location of placement of crane, members to be tackled, boom length and working radius? Whether the load chart of crane proposed fo be used, the weight of members to be lifted etc. and specific compliance of Railway Board instructions regarding crane working near track has been ensured? To be checked carefully at Divisional level. a in case of launching work, is proposed to be done in stages, whether the arrangement for securing of girders during all intermediate stages has been clearly indicated? The scheme for final work viz. fixing bearing, removal of temporary works as required etc. shall also be indicated. Standard A frame or Clipping arrangement to be proposed. Alternatively, twin assembled girder to be launched 42 ‘Whether manufacturer's guarantee certificate of individual component like bearings has been ensured wherever relevant? Bearings to be supplied by standard ROSO approved bearing manufacturer as per their own specifications and design. ‘Whether the QAP for fabrication and erection of girders and after erection of girders for check on camber etc. has been submitted and verified? RITES or any such PSU to be nominated for fabrication inspection and.erection certification. The GAP etc developed and approved as per BS-110 R and submitted with TAD, Indicate team of the railway officials with name and d {quality control and inspection of critical components vi It shall be covered while preparing QAP. ignation responsible for welding, bearing ete. 45 ‘Whether launching scheme is as per the RDSO standard launching scheme wherever applicable? Applicable to Bow String Girder only. Whether RDSO guidelines has been followed for fabrication of girders? For non-RDSO spans, whether accepted guidelines have been followed for fabrication work (reference may be given). To be done as per BS 110R by inspecting agency eg. RITES. 47 For steel girders, whether fabrication drawings have been approved by competent authority for all connection’s splices etc? Fabrication to be done in RDSO approved workshops. For bolted connections, whether HSFG bolts with DTI washers of reputed make have been used? Whether RDSO guidelines for HSFG bolts have been followed?As per CR guidelines issued in 22-05-2018, HSFG bolts are to be provided and certified by the supplier. | If, for replacement of any component like bearing etc. During service requires special equipment like special jacks, then whether availability of the same with the maintenance agency has been ensured? Applicable to important wack crossings of NHISRC/Metro ete. 30 | Whether any previous experience of undertaking a similar work at other places is available or known? (CBE should ask a brief from the executive department with details as what problems were encountered and how they will be tackled in the present work, The same should be submitted with CBE"s comments.) Applicable to important track crossings of NHSRC/Metro ete. ‘Whether the space requirement for launching and fabrication keeping the 51. | train position has been assessed properly? Division to correctly show the location of Girder etc in plan/TAD. Whether Technical Note of counterpart of executing department has been 52. | submitted and examined at CBE's level? ‘Applicable to important track crossings of NHSRC/Metro etc. ‘Whether stability of slopes for excavation has been examined for all 53. | excavations including under a relieving girder? Cross section should be shown to satisfy that the slopes will remain stable during execution. Addi | Additional Remarks: - onal |1,0 The crane of maximum capacity should be selected which should be more than 1.5 times the assessed/caloulated weight of the girder at the working radius and boom lengih. The relevant chart of crane of selected Make should be indicated. 2.0 The complete span should be attempted for launching / de-launching to reduce the block time. Otherwise a check note given detail justification and limitation to be attached with site sketch.