Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Last November, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong stressed the need for
the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) to maintain the trust of citizens.
Speaking at the PAP party convention, he said: "The PAP earned the
people's trust the hard way, and we must never take it for granted or
fritter it away."
A
As someone from the media with some access to the political elite,
who remains friends and in touch with ordinary folk remote from the
centres of political power, I sometimes feel like I live in two worlds.
I defend the Singapore system to those who have lost confidence in it.
I am proud of my country. I am also a product of the same system that
produced the political elite - some schoolmates are in the top rungs of
the public and political service. I too believe in the importance of
exceptional, competent, honest government. I give our leaders the
benefit of the doubt; I believe most mean well and are doing their best.
And I try to articulate the anger and despair of those who feel betrayed
to the elite. For example, what might explain this erosion of trust
among that group of Singaporeans so vocal about the issue?
I think one factor is that today's citizens may be expecting too much of
their leaders, thinking back to the pioneering generation. In turn,
leaders who hark back to the pioneering generation of ministers
inadvertently invite such comparisons.
The intellectual and achievement gap between the ruler and the ruled
has narrowed. Meanwhile, news and images of frequent train delays,
lift malfunctions, decaying trees and bursting water pipes, widely
shared on social media, all add to a sense that government agencies
are falling short even on maintenance matters. If performance forms
the bedrock of a trusting people-government relationship, alas, in
some people's minds, even that is faulty.
Both Keppel Corp and SMRT have been in the news for what appear to
be systemic issues. A Keppel subsidiary was fined by the US
authorities for giving bribes in Brazil. The corruption trail lasted 14
years, from 2001 to 2014.
One sobering recent analysis came from former PAP MP Goh Choon
Kang. In a commentary in Chinese daily Lianhe Zaobao, translated
and reprinted in The Straits Times on Dec 13, he wrote about the loss
of trust between the elite and the masses. He was referring mainly to
Western societies, not Singapore.
But he did warn against Singapore going the way of those Western
democracies, where the elite had turned their back on the masses:
"They lose touch with the masses even though they are in leading
positions. They feel that their achievements today are based solely on
their own capabilities and talent within the meritocracy implemented
by society. They bask in their own successes, sing their own praises
and no longer have the slightest empathy for the people, with the
political parties fighting for power but unable to understand and
sympathise with the public feeling.
"The system becomes such that it is your own problem if you cannot
keep up with the times or are left behind. As a result, many pressing
issues do not get proper attention. For example, jobs being outsourced
or becoming short-term hired labour because of globalisation, job
losses, workers facing job instability, wage stagnation, uneven
distribution and a widening gap between the rich and the poor...
If some segments feel that trust has been eroded, the government has
to first acknowledge that, before it can seek to restore and enhance it.
I think the political elite has to start addressing the reality: trust has
been chipped away in some quarters, although hopefully it is not
pervasive; or deep-seated, and can be repaired.