Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models are now advanced enough to simulate many complex flows. Researchers have used CFD in two ways to predict fluid elastic instability (FEI) thresholds: 1) Obtaining parameters like fluid force coefficients from CFD simulations for use in theoretical models; and 2) Directly coupling CFD simulations with structural models. One method involved modeling an oscillating tube to extract coefficients for an unsteady flow model predicting critical velocity. Other studies used CFD to determine time lags in tube bundles for use in a semi-analytical model. Another approach coupled CFD in separation zones with a structural model and far field flow model.
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models are now advanced enough to simulate many complex flows. Researchers have used CFD in two ways to predict fluid elastic instability (FEI) thresholds: 1) Obtaining parameters like fluid force coefficients from CFD simulations for use in theoretical models; and 2) Directly coupling CFD simulations with structural models. One method involved modeling an oscillating tube to extract coefficients for an unsteady flow model predicting critical velocity. Other studies used CFD to determine time lags in tube bundles for use in a semi-analytical model. Another approach coupled CFD in separation zones with a structural model and far field flow model.
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models are now advanced enough to simulate many complex flows. Researchers have used CFD in two ways to predict fluid elastic instability (FEI) thresholds: 1) Obtaining parameters like fluid force coefficients from CFD simulations for use in theoretical models; and 2) Directly coupling CFD simulations with structural models. One method involved modeling an oscillating tube to extract coefficients for an unsteady flow model predicting critical velocity. Other studies used CFD to determine time lags in tube bundles for use in a semi-analytical model. Another approach coupled CFD in separation zones with a structural model and far field flow model.
The computational fluid mechanics approach has reached an advanced enough level such that it is now being utilized to simulate many complex flows. This level of development has encouraged many researchers to explore the CFD approach to allow for a reliable prediction of the FEI threshold. Two strategies have been pursued: utilizing the CFD to obtain important parameters for the theoretical models, and using coupled fluid/structure simulations. The first strategy involves modeling the tube array with one or more tubes which are forced to either move to a static position or to undergo a prescribed periodic oscillation. Hassan et al. (2011) utilized the latter to extract a number of fluid force coefficients which were then utilized in an unsteady flow model to predict the stability threshold. Utilizing the developed unsteady model, the pitch to diameter ratio and the Reynolds Number effects on critical velocity were investigated. Khalifa et al. (2013) and El Bouzidi and Hassan (2015) developed numerical techniques to study the flow perturbations and time lag in tube bundles. The obtained time lag was utilized in the semianalytical model of Lever and Weaver (1986) to predict the reduced critical velocity. Anderson et al. (2014) developed a model to account for temporal variations in the flow separation for inline arrays, in which numerical simulations in the separation zone were coupled with a structural model and a far field flow model to obtain the stability threshold.