Professional Documents
Culture Documents
,is the maximum past effective overburden pressureto which the soil specimen has been subjected. It
can be determined by using a
a. Determine the point Oon the e–log s9curve that has the sharpest curvature
e. Produce the straight-line portion of the e–log s9curve backward to intersect OC. This is point D. The
pressure that corresponds to point Dis the
preconsolidation pressure s9
o,s9
,the
soil is overconsolidated.
Stas and Kulhawy (1984) correlated the preconsolidation pressure with liquidity
index in the following form:
s9
pa
510
s1.1121.62 LId
(2.51)
where
LI 5 liquidity index
A similar correlation has also been provided by Kulhawy and Mayne (1990),
s9
c5s9
o5
103
122.5LI21.25log
s9p
pa
+4
(2.52)
where so
ComPreSSIon InDex
Cc5
e12e2
log s9
22log s9
e12e2
log
s9
s9
1
2
(2.53)
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in
whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook
and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning
experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent
rights restrictions require it.
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in
whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
2.13 ConSoliDation 39
where e1
and e2
are the void ratios at the end of consolidation under effective stresses
s9
and s9
,respectively.
The compression index, as determined from the laboratory e–log s9curve, will
be somewhat different from that encountered in the field. The primary reason is
that the soil remolds itself to some degree during the field exploration. The nature
of variation of the e–log s9curve in the field for a normally consolidated clay
is shown in Figure 2.17. The curve, generally referred to as the virgin compression curve, approximately
intersects the laboratory curve at a void ratio of 0.42eo
,you can easily construct the virgin curve and calculate its compression index by using Eq. (2.53).
The value of Cc
Cc50.009sLL210d (2.54)
Rendon-Herrero (1983):
Cc50.141Gs
1.2
11eo
Gs
2.38
(2.55)
Cc50.2343
LLs%d
100
4
Gs
(2.56)
Cc5
no
371.74724.275no
(2.57)
Cc50.5Gs1
PIs%d
100
(2.58)
059
Pressure,9
(log scale)
Virgin
compression
curve,
Slope Cc
Void ratio, e
Laboratory
consolidation
curve
0.42 e
19
consolidated clay
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in
whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook
and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning
experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent
rights restrictions require it.
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in
whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
If a typical value of Gs5 2.7 is used in Eq. (2.58), we obtain (Kulhawy and Mayne,
1990)
Cc5
PIs%d
74
(2.59)
SWellInGInDex
Cs5
e32e4
log
s9
s9
(2.60)
to
10
The swelling index is also referred to as the recompression index and is denoted byCr
The determination of the swelling index is important in the estimation of consolidation settlement of
overconsolidated clays.In the field, depending on the pressure
and eo
,corresponds to the field conditions before any increase in pressure. Point bcorresponds to the
preconsolidation
pressure (s9
, s9
, s9
, Cc
,and Cs
,you can
Pressure,9
(log scale)
Virgin
compression
curve,
Slope Cc
Void
ratio, e
Slope
Cs
Slope
Cs
0.42 e
0
9
Laboratory
consolidation
curve
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in
whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook
and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning
experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent
rights restrictions require it.
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in
whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
Using the modified Cam clay model and Eq. (2.58), Kulhawy and Mayne (1990)
Cs5
PIs%d
370
(2.61)
Cs <
Cc
(2.62)
Calculation of Primary Consolidation
Settlement
may be calculated as
Sc5
De
11eo
Hc
(2.63)
where
Sc5primaryconsolidation settlement
o5s9
De5Cc log
s9
o1 Ds9
s9
(2.64)
where
so
2.14
Average
effective
pressure
before load
application
59
Groundwater table
Added pressure 5 D
Sand
Sand
Clay
Initial void
ratio 5 e
Hc
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in
whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook
and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning
experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent
rights restrictions require it.
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in
whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
Sc5
CcHc
11eo
log
s9
o1 Ds9
s9
(2.65)
o1 Ds9 #s9
De5Cslog
s9
o1 Ds9
s9
(2.66)
Sc5
CsHc
11eo
log
s9
o1 Ds9
s9
(2.67)
c,s9
o1 Ds9,then
s9
s9
1Cc log
s9
o1 Ds9
s9
(2.68)
Sc5
CsHc
11eo
log
s9
s9
CcHc
11eo
log
s9
o1 Ds9
s9
(2.69)