Bibliography

Webliography

Fariba Kiamarsi. (2015). Critical success factors for efficient bridge construction..

Retrieved from

http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/213286/213286.pdf

Sanjay Sampat Wakchaure (Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi,

India)Kumar Neeraj Jha (Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New

Delhi, India). (2011). Modeling of post‐construction failure factors of

bridges. Retrieved from

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/09727981111175975?

mbSc=1&fullSc=1&fullSc=1&journalCode=jamr

Anil Agrawal. (2004). Journal of Bridge Engineering . Retrieved from

https://ascelibrary.org/page/jbenf2/editorjbe

Mohiuddin Khan. (2014). Accelerated Bridge Construction. Retrieved from

https://www.elsevier.com/books/accelerated-bridge-construction/khan/978-

0-12-407224-4

Thomson Reuters. (2014). International Journal of Bridge Engineering. Retrieved

from https://www.ijbe.net/

Anil Agrawal, Bruce E. Peterson and Dennis R. Mertz (2004). Journal of Bridge

Engineering. Retrieved from http://cedb.asce.org/CEDBsearch/record.jsp?

dockey=0168562

Mahmoud and Khaled M. (2017) . Bridge Structures - Assessment, Design and

Construction. Retrived from https://content.iospress.com/journals/bridge-

structures/13/2-3
Mohiuddin Khan (2014). Accelerated Bridge Construction. Retrieved from

https://www.elsevier.com/books/accelerated-bridge-construction/khan/978-

0-12-407224-4

Paiste, E., et al. (2017) .“Utilizing Mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla king) Fruit

Shelles in making Floral Decoration”.

Dr. Colin Caprani (2006). Prestressed Concrete. Retrived from

https://www.slideshare.net/PriodeepChowdhury/prestressed-concrete-

design-56871214

Americas Cement Manufacturers (1916). Prestressed Concrete. Retrieved from

http://www.cement.org/cement-concrete-applications/products/prestressed-

concrete

Sugeng Wijanto And Takim Andriono (2008). State Of The Art: Research and

Application of Precast / Prestressed Concrete Systems In Indonesia.

Retrieved from http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/14_05-03-

0001.PDF

Pradeep Nath Mathur, Prof (Dr.) A. K. Sinha, Prof. (Dr.) P.B.L.Chaurasia (2015). The

pre- stress concrete structure, Found to-be More Effective Then THE

Reinforced concrete structure & System developed for mechanism OF,

Anchoring devices in pre and post Tensioned concrete structural elements.

Retrived from http://www.ajer.org/papers/v4(04)/G044040049.pdf

Appendices
 Table 1

Evaluation Form

Appendix A

Criteria Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

Agree Disagree
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Design Very unique Unique and Rarely seen in Now Very
and original original the industry commonly commonly
seen seen
Craftsmanshi The artwork With a little The student- The student- The student-
p was beautiful more effort, researchers researcher researcher
and patiently the wok could showed showed below poor
done; it was have been average average craftsmanship
good as hard outstanding; craftsmanship, craftsmanship. evidence of
work could lacks the final adequate but lazy or lack of
make it. changes not as good as understanding.
it could have
been careless.
 Evaluation Letter

Appendix B

Republic of the Philippines

UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN PHILIPPINES
Tamag, Vigan City
2700 Ilocos Sur
___________________________________________________________________________
Senior High School Affairs

April 30, 2018

MR. JOSEPH GREGORIO ACENA

Faculty, High School Department
Univerity of Northern Philippines
Vigan City

Ma’am/ Sir:

We, the Science, Technology , Engineering and Mathematics –C students are

conducting a capstone research project entitled “ACCEPTABILITY OF THE
PROPOSED TECHNOLOGICALLY-DESIGNED MINIATURE BRIDGE” in
the partial fulfilment for our subject Inquiries, Investigation and Immersion.
In the connection, may we humbly request your assistance through evaluating our
evaluation form needed for the completion of our study.
Thank you and God bless!

Respectfully yours,

XYNA ROSE V. PRADES

ALJEN B. TORRICER

DARYLLE Q. FERNANDO

HASHMERA L. ADOMA

JEXTER P. PISALBO

LEAN DERRICK A. RAMOS

MARK JEFFERSON D. BITONIO

NEIL CYRIL P. FORTUNA

The Student-Researchers

Noted:

JEFFREY GALANGCO, BS-MATH

Capstone Research Project Adviser
 Evaluation Form
Appendix C
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN PHILIPPINES
Tamag, Vigan City

COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION

CONTENT EVALUATION FORM

Please evaluate the attached evaluation form on the “ACCEPTABILITY OF

THE PROPOSED TECHNOLOGICALLY-DESIGNED MINIATURE
BRIDGE” based on the criteria below:

5 - Strongly Agree (SA)

4 - Agree (A)

3 - Undecided (U)

2 - Disagree (D)

1 -Strongly Disagree (SD)

Criteria Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

Agree Disagree
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Design Very unique Unique and Rarely seen in Now Very
and original original the industry commonly commonly
seen seen
Craftsmanshi The artwork With a little The student- The student- The student-
p was beautiful more effort, researchers researcher researcher
and patiently the wok could showed showed below poor
done; it was have been average average craftsmanship
good as hard outstanding; craftsmanship, craftsmanship. evidence of
work could lacks the final adequate but lazy or lack of
make it. changes not as good as understanding.
it could have
been careless.

Criteria Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

Agree Disagree
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Design
Craftsmanshi .
p
TOTAL

Validity Index
Comments, suggestions and recommendations for the improvement of this captone
research project instrument.

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

________________________
Signature Over Printed Name