J Oral Maxillofac Surg

61:32-34, 2003

Natural Course of Disc Displacement

With Reduction of the
Temporomandibular Joint: Changes in
Clinical Signs and Symptoms
Shuichi Sato, DDS, PhD,* Satoshi Goto, DDS,†
Fumiko Nasu, DDS,‡ and Katsutoshi Motegi, MD, DDS, PhD¶

Purpose: The goal of this study was to examine the natural course of disc displacement with reduction
in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).
Patients and Methods: This retrospective study involved 24 patients who had been diagnosed with
disc displacement with reduction of the TMJ, but who had not undergone any treatment. The extent of
maximal mouth opening, protrusion, lateral excursions, noise of the TMJ, pain of the TMJ, and
tenderness of masticatory muscles were recorded monthly for a mean of 25.8 months.
Results: Maximal mouth opening, protrusion, and lateral excursions remained unchanged during
follow-up. TMJ pain decreased by 15.7% (P ⬎ .05). Clicking decreased by 20.8% (P ⬍ .05), and
tenderness of masticatory muscles decreased by 33.3% (P ⬍ .05). Reciprocal clicking remained un-
changed in 19 patients (79.2%) and disappeared in 5 patients (23.8%). Four patients (16.7%) in whom
clicking disappeared had a normal mouth opening, but locking developed in 1 patient (4.2%).
Conclusions: In patients with disc displacement with reduction who do not undergo treatment, range
of movement remains unchanged over time. Tenderness of masticatory muscles tended lessen, but
reciprocal clicking and TMJ pain tended to remain. Clicking did not progress to locking in most patients.
© 2003 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:32-34, 2003

Painful disc displacement with reduction in the tem-
poromandibular joint (TMJ) has been treated with
medication, disc-repositioning splints1-5 physical ther-
apy,6,7 and surgery.8-10 However, most studies evalu-
ating the effect of a particular treatment for disc
displacement with reduction have lacked an un-
treated control group. Although many patients benefit
from these treatments, earlier studies11-13 indicate that
reciprocal clicking does not usually progress to lock-
ing. An understanding of the natural history of the
Received from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery I,
Tohoku University School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan.
*Lecturer.
†Assistant Professor.
‡Resident.
¶Professor.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Sato: De-
partment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery I, Tohoku University
School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575,
Japan, e-mail: shuichi@mail.cc.tohoku.ac.jp
© 2003 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
0278-2391/03/6101-0006$35.00/0
doi:10.1053/joms.2003.50005
disease seems necessary for evaluating the actual ef-
fect of a particular treatment. The purpose of this
study was to clarify the natural course of disc displace-
ment with reduction in the TMJ.
Patients and Methods
This retrospective study involved 24 patients (6
male patients and 18 female patients) ranging in age
from 11 to 43 years, with mean age of 19.3 years.
Between 1993 and 1998, 321 patients were diagnosed
with disc displacement with reduction of the TMJ at
the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,
Tohoku University. Of these 321 patients, 24 were
selected for no treatment. They agreed not to undergo
treatment and were observed periodically (usually
monthly) for a mean of 25.8 months (range, 6 to 53
months). Twenty patients were diagnosed with a uni-
lateral condition and 4 with a bilateral condition. The
following inclusion criteria were used: 1) clinical di-
agnosis of disc displacement with reduction based on
the presence of reciprocal clicking; 2) diagnosis con-
firmed with arthrography or magnetic resonance im-
aging (MRI); 3) no active treatment provided; and 4)

32
SATO ET AL
Table 1. CHANGES IN CLINICAL SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS
A range of motion for maximal mouth opening (mm)
Protrusion (mm)
Lateral excursion to the TMJ affected side (mm)
Lateral excursion to the TMJ uaffected side (mm)
Patients with TMJ pain (n [%])
Patients with clicking (n [%])
Patients with tenderness of the masticatory muscles (n [%])
*Mean ⫾ standard deviation.
†Significant differences between initial visit and follow-up (P ⬍ .05).
monthly follow-up data were available for at least 6
months.
The extent of maximal mouth opening, protrusion,
lateral excursion to the affected and unaffected sides,
noise in the TMJ, pain in the TMJ, and tenderness of
masticatory muscles were thoroughly documented at
the initial visit and at monthly follow-up. The interin-
cisal distance at active full mouth opening was mea-
sured in millimeters as the range of motion for max-
imal mouth opening. Clicking and crepitus of the TMJ
and tenderness of the TMJ and masticatory muscles
were evaluated by palpation. Spontaneous pain of the
TMJ during maximal mouth opening and mastication
were also evaluated. Whether reciprocal clicking pro-
gressed to locking during the follow-up period was
recorded. Locking was clinically defined as a history
of clicking followed by limitation of opening ability
without clicking, and protrusion and lateral excur-
sions without clicking.
Paired t tests were used to analyze differences in
the range of motion for maximal mouth opening,
protrusion, and lateral excursion to the affected and
unaffected sides between patients at the initial visit
and at follow-up. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess
changes in the noise and TMJ pain and changes in
tenderness of masticatory muscles if the observed
frequencies in 2 ⫻ 2 contingency tables differed from
those expected. Significance was set at P values less
than .05.
Results
In the 24 patients followed up for a mean 25.8
months, maximal mouth opening, protrusion, and
lateral excursions to the affected and unaffected sides
remained unchanged. TMJ pain was present in 6 pa-
tients (25.0%) at the initial visit. It decreased to 2
patients (8.3%, P ⬎ .05). The number of patients with
reciprocal clicking decreased from 24 (100%) to 19
(79.2%, P ⬍ .05) (Table 1). The number of patients
with tenderness of masticatory muscles decreased
from 9 to 1 (P ⬍ .05) (Table 1). Reciprocal clicking
33
At Initial Visit At Follow-Up
51.4 ⫾ 6.59* 52.1 ⫾ 7.79*
7.3 ⫾ 2.37* 8.0 ⫾ 3.41*
8.1 ⫾ 2.48* 9.0 ⫾ 3.45*
7.7 ⫾ 2.33* 8.1 ⫾ 3.32*
6 (25.0) 2 (8.3)
24 (100) 19 (79.2)†
9 (37.5) 1 (4.2)†
remained unchanged in 19 patients (79.2%) and dis-
appeared in 5 patients (23.8%) (Table 1). In 4 patients
(16.7%), clicking disappeared without reduced mouth
opening a mean of 9.3 months (range, 1 to 17
months) after the initial visit. In 1 patient (4.2%),
clicking disappeared with reduced mouth opening 3
months after the initial visit (Table 2).
Discussion
This study showed that, in patients with disc dis-
placement with reduction who did not undergo treat-
ment, range of mandibular movement remains un-
changed over time. Masticatory muscle tenderness
tends to lessen, but reciprocal clicking and TMJ pain
tend to remain. Clicking does not progress to locking
in most patients. Several studies followed the course
of TMJ clicking with or without interventions.11-13
Lundh et al11 followed up 23 untreated patients with
reciprocal clicking for 52 weeks. The authors ob-
served that reciprocal clicking disappeared in 2 pa-
tients without reduced mouth opening after 6 weeks,
and locking developed in 1 patient after 17 weeks.
However, reciprocal clicking remained unchanged in
the other patients. The authors also observed that the
frequency of masticatory muscle tenderness in-
creased during 52 weeks.
Koenoenen et al12 examined the variation of re-
ported and recorded TMJ clicking in 128 young adults
longitudinally over 9 years. They found that reported
and recorded TMJ clicking increased with age, vary-
ing from 11% to 31% and from 11% to 34%, respec-
tively, and that no patients developed locking. Our
Table 2. PATIENTS IN WHOM CLICKING
PROGRESSED TO LOCKING DURING FOLLOW-UP
Progression to Locking Patients (n [%])
Yes 1 (4.2)
No 23 (95.8)
34
results were consistent with those of these studies
that clicking does not usually progress to locking in
patients with reciprocal clicking who do not undergo
treatment. However, our results did not agree with
those of Lundh et al regarding masticatory muscle
tenderness changes. The present study showed that
masticatory muscle tenderness tends lessen in such
patients, although Lundh et al11 found that the fre-
quency of masticatory muscle tenderness increases. It
is known that several factors such as age, gender,
angle of the posterior slope of the eminence, and
degenerative changes of the condyle influenece clin-
ical outcome in patients with temporomandibular dis-
orders.14,15 We suggest that changes in masticatory
muscle tenderness in our patients might be different
from those in patients in Lundh et al’s study11 because
of the different distribution of these factors in patients
between the 2 studies.
We cannot say why reciprocal clicking disappeared
without locking in 4 patients, because these patients
did not agree to undergo MRI after the clicking dis-
appeared. In such patients, disc displacement with
reduction might convert to disc displacement without
reduction, but without occasion locking. Conversely,
disc position might be normalized.
When treatment for internal derangement is initi-
ated, reduction of pain is an essential goal. In this
study, only 25% of patients exhibited pain when they
agreed to forego treatment. The most significant out-
come in this group may be the maintenance of func-
tion and diminution of clicking. However, whether
cessation of clicking should be a treatment goal is
controversial.
References
1. Clark GT: Treatment of jaw clicking with temporomandibular
repositioning: Analysis of 25 cases. J Craniomandib Pract 2:263,
1984
NATURAL COURSE OF REDUCING DISC DISPLACEMENT
2. Anderson GC, Schulte JK, Goodkind RJ: Comparative study of
two treatment methods for internal derangement of the tem-
poromandibular joint. J Prosthet Dent 53:392, 1985
3. Lundh H, Westesson PL, Kopp S, et al: Anterior repositioning
splint in the treatment of temporomandibular joints with re-
ciprocal clicking: Comparison with a flat occlusal splint and an
untreated control group. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 60:
131, 1985
4. Moloney F, Howard J: Internal derangements of the temporo-
mandibular joint: III. Anterior repositioning splint therapy.
Aust Dent J 31:30, 1986
5. Lundh H, Westesson PL, Jisander S, et al: Disk-repositioning
onlays in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disk dis-
placement: Comparison with a flat occlusal splint and with no
treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 66:155, 1988
6. Greene CS, Laskin DM: Long-term status of TMJ clicking in
patients with myofacial pain and dysfunction. J Am Dent Assoc
117:461, 1988
7. Kirk W, Calabrese DK: Clinical evaluation of physical therapy
in the management of internal derangement of the temporo-
mandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:113, 1989
8. Werther JR, Hall HD, Gibbs SJ: Type of disc displacement and
change in disc position after modified condylotomy in 80
symptomatic T-M joints. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 79:
668, 1995
9. Hall HD, Nickerson JW, McKenna SJ: Modified condylotomy for
treatment of the painful temporomandibular joint with a re-
ducing disk. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:133, 1993
10. Hall HD, Mavarro EZ, Gibbs SJ: One- and three-year prospective
outcome study of modified condylotomy for treatment of re-
ducing disc displacement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:7, 2000
11. Lundh H, Westesson PL, Kopp S, et al: Anterior repositioning
splint in the treatment of temporomandibular joints with re-
ciprocal clicking: Comparison with a flat occlusal splint and an
untreated control group. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 60:
131, 1985
12. Koenoenen M, Waltimo A, Nystroem M: Does clicking in ado-
lescence lead to painful temporomandibular joint locking? Lan-
cet 347:1080, 1996
13. Waenman A, Agerberg G: Temporomandibular joint sounds in
adolescents: A longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol 69:2, 1990
14. Sato S, Goto S, Kawamura H, et al: The natural course of
nonreducing disc displacement of the TMJ: Relationship of
clinical findings at initial visit to outcome after 12 months
without treatment. J Orofac Pain 11:315, 1997
15. Sato S, Goto S, Kasahara T, et al: Effect of pumping with
injection of sodium hyaluronate and the other factors related to
outcome in patients with nonreducing disk displacement of
the temporomandibular joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30:194,
2001