Topic

Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is

encouraged.

To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development?

Sample BAND 8.0+

Governments across continents have turned their attention to more sustainable sources of
energy as alternatives to fossil fuel. In my opinion, this could be seen as a progress for the
following reasons.

First, there is no arguing that producing energy from buried dead organisms lacks
sustainability, which means such production could not guarantee the survival of humans in
the long term. In fact, the consumption of energy generated from fossil fuel tends to
accelerate in direct correlation with the growth of the world population. With the current rate
of exploitation, this valuable resource would dwindle away in no time, leaving no other
choices than seeking additional reserves such as nuclear power or hydroelectricity. This is a
safe solution to the fear of energy scarcity and ensures the future development of the
human race.

Second, dependence on fossil fuel for worldwide energy supply would cause environmental
degradation while using solar power, for example, is considered an ultimate choice of
energy conservation. The combustion of fossil fuels is the culprit of greenhouse gas
emission and other air pollutants, leading to tremendous damage to the environment. Such
suffering of the Earth could not be justified by the growing need of humans. By contrast, this
would never be the case when it comes to other alternatives as mentioned above. If
governments continue to invest in exploiting those new sources, there will be an unlimited
amount of inexpensive energy on the long run.

In conclusion, I believe that the use of other potential energy sources to replace fossil fuel is
obviously an important step forward.

(261 words)
Toàn ZIM - Writing Within Reach