Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The QWL™ Study provides you with insight into your employees’ intrapersonal skills in order to
identify the potential to improve people productivity and employee health.
The Study is not just a stress or engagement survey nor is it a health risk assessment. It goes
beyond these issues by giving employers powerful, upstream opportunities by predicting
opportunities and risks that will impact employee productivity, as well obtain a clear set of bench
marks as to where the organizations people productivity is.
The QWL™ results provide employees and employers insight on the relationship between
cognitive coping skills engagement, productivity, health, and financial burden. While employers
cannot think for employees, employers can provide employees with opportunities to develop
intrapersonal skills.
The
Benefits
of
QWL™
Beyond engagement uncovers future and current risks including stress, presenteeism,
absenteeism, mental heath, ineffective management, counter productive behaviors, physical
health and safety risks. And all can be avoided.
But what opportunities are there for both the employer and employee to maximize people
productivity? We have found the most productivity people are happiest and healthiest people!
Employees receive immediate feedback as to their current risk and will be provided with
recommendations for action. Employers receive an aggregated report providing insight on the
workforce’s coping skills, stress, engagement and health. Information on productivity,
presenteeism, pro-social behaviors, population health, counter-productive behaviors, mental
health and safety risk are included. The report also includes recommendations for improvement.
“Significantly
under-‐uFlized
people
potenFal”
We are currently conducting a study with The Globe and Mail that validates the link between
what employees think and their perceptions of stress, engagement, health risk and productivity.
ü Cognitive coping skills are a leading indicator for predicting stress, engagement and health
risk.
ü Employees reporting productivity levels of 60% also reported lower coping skills,
engagement, health and higher levels of stress than employees reporting productivity levels
of 80% and higher.
ü Engagement is a lagging indicator; it does not predict productivity or health.
Leading
NaFonal
Studies
You already know that your organization’s success depends on your people. You also know that
people productivity and health costs are significant drivers of your bottom line.
Ø But did you know that the latest research shows that intrapersonal skills (how people perceive,
think and choose to behave) is the predictor of these two key success drivers (not engagement,
not satisfaction)?
This means that your organization’s success depends on what your employees think. Defective
perceptions, negative thinking and flawed choices can result in employee behavior that does not
support organizational success nor the employee’s productivity, engagement and health.
Unrealized
PotenFal
=
Lost
$$
Ø Legal Liability = damages for failing to provide a psychological safe workplace (or harassment
% % % % %
Mental
Chronic Mental Health Disorder
Happy OK Strain Issue (Organic/
Cognitive)
Na,onal
Voluntary
Creates
new
While the National Standard for
Standard
for
standard
for
due
Psychologically Safe Workplaces* is
Psychologically
Safe
diligence
voluntary, it now offers a standard of
Workplaces*
reference for employer due diligence in
protecting employees.
Occupa,onal
Human
Employment
Health
&
Safety
Rights
Law
QWL™ provides organizations with a
quantitative strategy for predicting
down stream risk and evidence of its
efforts in meeting its obligations for
Employer’s Duty to Keep protecting its workforce.
Employees Safe
*hGp://shop.csa.ca/en/canada/occupa,onal-‐health-‐and-‐safety-‐management/cancsa-‐z1003-‐13bnq-‐9700-‐8032013/invt/z10032013/?
utm_source=redirect&utm_medium=vanity&utm_content=folder&utm_campaign=z1003
QWL
ApplicaFons:
Why
Employers
Are
Calling
Reactive: Understanding How to Turn it Around Proactive: Identifying High Impact Options
QWL
versus
Engagement
Surveys
Employee
Engagement
Uncovers
Symptoms
Total
Engagement,
ProducFvity
&
Health
Addresses
Root
Drivers
The
QWL
Process
1. Employers complete the Fast Audit and Employer Productivity & QWL Risk Assessment to
measure organizational effectiveness and employee productivity
Note:
Mini QWL average time: 8 minutes/employee
Full QWL average time 25-30 minutes/employee
QWL
Products
Stress Index X X
Engagement Index X X
Health Index X X
Demographic Biodata X X
Pro-social Habits X
Productivity Index X
21-44th Stage 1 – employee reports low levels of stress, may report periods of Evaluate current diet, BMI, sleep and exercise habits. Check to
fatigue due to work-life balance challenges. There can be some ensure caffeine and alcohol levels are not high. Evaluate current
Percentile psychological regret that in times of pressures make it difficult to engage life style habits. Evaluate if cognitive appraisal coping skills can be
in activity of choice such as exercise, hobbies. This can result in mild improved. Determine what if any workplace issues are contributing.
impairments to well being.
45-60th Stage 2 – employee is experiencing chronic stress; more flight/flight Complete health risk assessment to determine employee’s risk for
responses result in increased stress hormones. Strain increases risks for hypertension, depression, cholesterol, body fat, as well as a
Percentile high blood pressure, digestive problems. Common for employee to look psychological screen to determine level of risk for food addiction &
for coping mechanisms. Strain is also associated with decreased levels other potential abuse such as drugs & gambling. Evaluate whether
of physical health and moderate impairments to well being. workplace issues are contributing factors.
61-75th Stage 3 – employee is at risk for experiencing mental health symptoms More emphasis on getting a health risk assessment for physical
that can drastically disrupt quality of life such as depression, anxiety and and psychological health. Screen for comorbidties imperative and
Percentile drug abuse. Risk factors are higher and employee may be receiving treat as indicated. Evaluate current gaps in cognitive appraisal
some medical/prescriptive interventions. The longer the employee stays coping skills. Evaluate whether workplace issues are contributing
in this state, the greater the risk for permanent health issues. At this factors. Ensure there is an intervention plan in writing to facilitate
stage there are significant impairments to well being. change. EAP meeting recommended to ensure a professional
support network. It is imperative a treatment plan is in place.
75-100th Stage 4 – employee is at risk for severe physical or mental health issues Imperative medication and psychological screening & treatment.
that may or may not be diagnosed. Employee is a great risk and requires Therapy & pharmacological interventions are common. On going
Percentile immediate mental attention (if not already obtaining medical support). It monitoring of cognitive appraisal coping skills important. Important
is common for employees at this level to have comorbidties and have to monitor and screen for addiction and suicide intention. Common
several health related issues. The employees is often off work on a for employee to have developed chronic health related issues such
regular basis. as diabetes, hyper tension, etc..
When
You
Are
Ready
to
Go
Beyond
Engagement…