Cambridge Firefighters Union Local 30 writes an open letter to City Manager Louis DePasquale on June 22, saying members will boycott any fire chief the city selects through the Sole Assessment Center. The union says the center is an "unproven process" that's "wildly subjective" and "ripe for abuse."
Original Title
Cambridge Firefighters Union Local 30 boycotts search process for fire chief
Cambridge Firefighters Union Local 30 writes an open letter to City Manager Louis DePasquale on June 22, saying members will boycott any fire chief the city selects through the Sole Assessment Center. The union says the center is an "unproven process" that's "wildly subjective" and "ripe for abuse."
Cambridge Firefighters Union Local 30 writes an open letter to City Manager Louis DePasquale on June 22, saying members will boycott any fire chief the city selects through the Sole Assessment Center. The union says the center is an "unproven process" that's "wildly subjective" and "ripe for abuse."
CAMBRIDGE FIREFIGHTERS UNION
LOCAL 30, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FI rERS
June 22, 2020
Mr. Manager:
This letter serves as official notification that Local 30 is boycotting the City’s Sole
Assessment Center to fill the position of Fire Chief. The City is insisting on using an unproven,
process without, good faith or basic due diligence in ensuring the process will not be abused to
favor one or more candidates.
We have been discussing the position of Fire Chief, and the process by which the position
should be filled, for several years. As you know, the City deviated from longstanding practice
when it declined to participate in a Civil Service examination prior to Chief Reardon's retirement
in March of 2017. The City made this decision despite knowing that it would result in a vacancy
at the head of a public safety department in one of the Commonwealth's largest cities, and
without any formal promotional process to fill that vacancy. When the inevitable vacancy
occurred, the City deliberately chose an Acting Chief without any formal process or evaluation. It
is precisely because of the City's deliberate actions and inactions that the Fire Department has
been commanded for more than three years by a provisional Chief appointed through a highly
subjective process.
In 2019, the City unilaterally decided to change the process by which the Fire Chief is
selected, and entered a Delegation Agreement with the Massachusetts Human Resources
Division to fil the position via a Sole Assessment Center. The City deliberately withheld this
information from the Local for several months, waiting to notify us until we had agreed on a
successor contract.
During impact bargaining sessions regarding the City's unilateral decision, Local 30
repeatedly voiced our concems that the City had not performed due diligence to evaluate how
Sole Assessment Centers worked, whether they provided a superior means of evaluating a
candidate, how those evaluations would be conducted, how the process could be as objective
as practicable, and how that objectivity could be verified by both candidates and the members of
the Cambridge Fire Department whom the person selected would lead
The City’s representatives displayed a stunning ignorance about all aspects of Assessment
Centers, including methods of evaluation, potential benefits and drawbacks of various
processes, and how evaluators would be selected and trained. They repeatedly waved away
P.0, BOX 400818 CAMBRIDGE, MA. 02140-0009
=Local 30's suggestions for improving transparency and objectivity, and our concerns that the
City’s proposed process was wildly subjective and ripe for abuse.
During the impact bargaining session on August 29, 2019, we believe we discovered why the
City was so dismissive of our concerns. When asked directly, “Do you agree with Local 30's
position that the incumbent Acting Chief should not have any advantage in the Assessment
Center process,” the City replied that they did not agree, and thought that the Acting Chief
should have an advantage because of his experience in the position. We pointed out that the
Acting Chief attained that position without an open competitive process, at the sole discretion of
the City, and was now being given an additional advantage. This is unequivocally unfair, and a
textbook case of favoritism that makes a mockery of the City's pretensions of being an equitable
workplace. (The City's representatives attempted to walk back this endorsement of incumbency
advantage at the following meeting.)
The City has neglected its duty to provide steady leadership for a department charged with
ensuring the safety of the public, and refused to honestly engage with the labor union charged
with both protecting the public and advocating for the safety and well-being of its Members. As
we have pointed out on many occasions, the principal reason that the promotional process is so
important to Local 30 is that the Fire Chief is ultimately responsible for determining how we
operate in extremely unsafe conditions which could result in serious injury or death to
firefighters or the public. We cannot abide the installation of a candidate through such a flawed
and illegitimate process, particularly when Civil Service is providing an acceptable alternative in
October.
‘As such, twelve of the thirteen Deputy Chiefs have agreed to boycott the Sole Assessment
Center process, including all eight Division Deputies, and the Deputies in charge of Emergency
Preparedness and Coordination, Fire Prevention, Special Operations and Safety, and
Emergency Medical Services. If the City decides to proceed with this fatally flawed process,
Local 30 will immediately call for a Vote of No Confidence in whoever is named to the position.
Respectfully,
Cambridge Firefighters Union
Local 30, International Association of Fire Fighters
Khe
Chris Haynes, President
Deputy Chiefs
John Cotter Brian Gover Kenneth Jenness Robert Walsh
Mark Cunningham Patrick Haggerty Edward Morrissey Jr. Sean White
Peter Donovan Frederick Ikels Michael Morrissey Raymond Vaillancourt