Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BODIES
August 1981
NASA
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration
Langley Research Center
Hampton, Virginia 23665
STRESS-INTENSITY FACTOR EQUATIONS FOR CRACKS IN
° SUMMARY
corner cracks at a hole in finite plates. The plates were subjected to remote
of parametric angle, crack depth, crack length, plate thickness, and, where
parameters was included in the equations. The ratio of crack depth to plate
thickness ranged from O to l, the ratio of crack depth to crack length ranged
from 0.2 to 2, and the ratio of hole radius to plate thickness ranged from
crack front were also included, but were generally based on engineering
except within a thin "boundary layer" where the crack front intersects a free
surface. However, the proposed equations are expected to give a good estimate
and propagation of cracks from notches or defects in the material that are
either embedded,on the surface, or at a corner. These cracks propagate with
Very few exact solutions for three-dimensional cracked bodies are available
in the literature. One of these, an elliptical crack in an infinite solid sub-
jected to uniform tension, was derived by Irwin [l] using an exact stress analy-
sis by Green and Sneddon[2]. For finite bodies, all solutions have required
ness, Smith, Emery, and Kobayashi [3], and Kobayashi [4], respectively, used
plate, Tracey [8] and Pickard [9] used the finite-element method; Kobayashi and
Enetanya [lO] used the alternating method. Shah [ll] estimated the stress-
intensity factors for a surface crack emanating from a circular hole. For a
single corner crack emanating from a circular hole in a plate, Smith and
Kullgren [12] used a finite-element-alternating method to obtain the stress-
3
intensity factors. Hechmerand Bloom[13] and Raju and Newman [14] used the
a plate. All of these approximate results, except that for the surface crack
[6,9] and the corner crack I_9], were presented in the form of curves or tables.
are preferable.
length, plate thickness, and hole radius (where applicable), for example see
The equations were based on the stress-intensity factors obtained from three-
[5,14], and cover a wide range of configuration parameters. The ratio of crack
depth to plate thickness (a/t) ranged from 0 to l, the ratio of crack depth to
crack length (a/c) ranged from 0.2 to 2, and the ratio of hole radius to plate
thickness (R/t) ranged from 0.5 to 2. The effects of plate width (b) on
stress-intensity variations along the crack front were also included, but were
4
SYMBOLS
a depth of crack
radius of hole
Poisson's ratio
factor variation along the crack front for an embedded elliptical crack, a
in a finite plate subjected to remote tensile loading (see Fig. 2). The
finite-element models used for these confi'gurations were the same as those used
in references 5 and 14 for surface cracks and corner cracks at holes. The only
differences were the boundary conditions that were imposed on certain faces of
the models. For embedded cracks and surface cracks at holes, the normal dis-
placements on three planes of symmetry were fixed (set equal to zero), except
for the crack surface. For a corner crack in a plate, the normal displacements
yses by using a nodal-force method, the details of which are given in refer-
ences 5 and 15. In this method, the nodal forces normal to the crack plane and
ahead of the crack front were used to evaluate the stress-intensity factors.
where Q is the shape factor for an ellipse and is given by the square of the
models, the w_dth (b) and length (h) of the plate were taken to be large emough
so that they would have a negligible effect on stress intensity. The boundary
tion of crack depth, crack length, hole radius (where applicable), plate thick-
ness, and the parametric angle of the ellipse. Figure 3 shows the coordinate
Very useful empirical expressions for Q have been developed by Rawe (see
The maximum error in the stress-intensity factor by using these equations for
Q was about 0.13 percent for all values of a/c. (Rawe's original equation
element results for the embedded elliptical crack and the quarter-elliptic
corner crack in a finite plate subjected to uniform tension are given in Tables
l and 2, respectively, for various parametric angles and several a/c and
a/t ratios. Tables 3a and 3b give the boundary-correction factors for two-
finite plate subjected to uniform tension for R/t equal I and 2, respectively.
s
STRESS-INTENSITY FACTOR EQUATIONS
emanating from holes, polynomial equations in terms of c/R and ¢ were also
used.
crack in a finite plate, Figure 2a, subjected to tension was obtained by fit-
ting to the finite-element results presented herein (Table l). To account for
(3)
for 0 <_a/c <__, c/b < 0.5, and -x <_b <_ provided that a/t satisfies:
a<t,
,,(a+o0)
,oro<a<c (4)
a< l for 0.2 < a< _
t -c-
8
The function Fe accounts for the influence of crack shape (a/c), crack size
(a/t), finite width (c/b), and angular location (¢), and was chosen as
Fe : [MI + H2 It)It) l
+ M3 g f¢ fw
(5)
g = f¢ = 1). The function f@ was taken from the exact solution for an em-
MI --I (B)
M2 = O. 05
M3 0.29 (8)
0.23 +
g = l cos ¢ (9)
and
f@ = cos2 ¢ + si (lO)
. 9
The finite-width correction, fw' from Reference 6 was
for c/b < 0.5. (Note that for the embedded crack, t is defined as one-half
Ml : _ (12)
and
(13)
sin 2 ¢ + cos2 ¢I I/4
The functions
M2, M3, g, and f are given by equations (7), (8), (9), and
(ll), respectively.
equation reduces to
for c/b = O.
a/t < 0.55 and within 3 percent for a/t < 0.8.
lO
As _ a/c approaches infinity and ¢ equals zero, the equation reduces to
KI:s (IS>
Equation (15) is the accepted solution [16] for this configuration as a/t
approaches unity.
results for an embedded elliptical crack is shown in Figure 4 for a/c = 0.4
against the parametric angle. At ¢ : 0 and 7/2, the equation {solid curves)
error" is defined as the difference between the equation and the finite-element
results normalized by the maximum value for that particular case. This defi-
from small to large values along the crack front.) The dashed curve shows the
exact solution for an elliptic crack in an infinite solid [l]. These results
indicate that the finite-element solution for a/t = 0.2 is probably about
1.5 percent below the exact solution. Because the proposed equation is
slightly higher than the finite-element results, the equation should be very
accurate.
elliptical surface crack in a finite plate, Figure 2b, subjected to tension was
obtained from Reference 6. This equation was previously fitted to the finite-
element results from Raju and Newman [5] for a/c values from 0.2 to I. An
II
equation for a/c greater than unity was developed herein. To account for the
limiting behavior as a/c approaches zero, the results of Gross and Srawley
[17] for a single-edge crack were also used. The equation is
for 0 <_a/c <_2, c/b < 0.5, and 0 <_@ <7, again, provided that a/t
(17)
00 (a) (18)
0.89
I
M3 = 0.5 - + 14 - (20)
0.65 + a
C
given by equation (ll). Equations (17) through (21) were taken from Reference
12
For a/c> l:
(22)
(23)
(24)
g = l + [O.l + 0.35
(25)
the crack front for a semi-elliptical surface crack with a/c = 2 for two
a/t ratios. The proposed equation (solid curves) is within 3 percent of the
For a/c <_ l, Reference 6 gives a more complete comparison between the
Reference 18, the equation was also used to correlate surface-crack fracture
data for a brittle epoxy material within +_lO percent over a wide range of crack
13
Quarter-elliptical Corner Crack
corner crack in a finite plate, Figure 2c, subjected to tension was obtained
equation is
KI = S Fc _, _, (26)
for 0.2 <_ a/c _2, a/t _ I, and 0 <_¢ <_d2 for c/b < 0.2. The function
F was chosen as
c
(27)
tion (27) because results on finite-width plates were not available for com-
.,
;,o.
o ) (28)
(30)
gl
i Ioo8
sin,
o41 3 Ic (31)
14
(32)
g2 = ] + [0.08 + 0.15
(34)
(35)
gl = l +
[ 0.08 + 0.4 (l - sin ¢)3 (36)
(37)
0.2) under tension loading. The present finite-element results are shown as
solid circular symbols and the proposed equation is shown as the solid curve.
Tracey [8] and Pickard [9] also used the finite-element method, but the width
(b) and half-length (h) of their models were equal to the plate thickness (see
15
dashed and dash-dot lines in the insert). Kobayashi [lO] used the alternating
method, but the a/c ratio was 0.98. Pickard's results were l to 3 percent
higher than the present finite-element results. Part of the difference is due
to a width- and length-effect in Pickard's model. And the present results are
expected to be about 1.5 percent below the exact solution. Near @= 0 and
_/2, Tracey's and Kobayashi's results are 5 to 13 percent higher than the
present results. All results are in good agreement (within 3 percent) at the
mid-point (@ = _/4).
The figures show the results for several a/t ratios. The proposed equation
sults (symbols), except near the intersection of the crack front with the free
higher than the finite-element results. The maximum difference being about 5
percent. These low values at the free surfaces are probably due to a boundary-
hole in a finite plate, Figure 2d, subjected to tension was obtained by fitting
to the finite-element results presented here (Tables 3a and 3b). The equation
is
16
(38)
KI = S_ _- Fsh Ia
_' t'
a t'
R b'
R b'
c ¢I
for 0.2 <_ a/c <__2, a/t < l, 0.5 <_ R/t <_2, (R + c)/b < 0.5, and
-7/2 <_ ¢ <_7/2. (Note that here t is defined as one-half of the full plate
Fsh
- "i+ "2_ + "3 _ 9192f_fw (39)
Ml : l (40)
M2 O. 05
O.ll +
0.29 (42)
M3 = 3/2
0.23 + a
C
whe re
17
l
= C
(45)
I + # cos (0.9 ¢_)
was taken as
sec (46)
(4 (b-c) + 2nc _/_)11/2
_T(2R+nc)
This equation was chosen to account for the effects of width on stress concen-
tration at the hole [20] and for crack eccentricity [16]. For a/c > I:
Ml : _ (47)
The functions M2' M3' gl' g2' and _ are given by equations (41) through
(45), and the functions f¢ and fw are given by equation (13) and (46),
respectively.
single-surface crack located at the center of a hole can be estimated from the
developed by Shah [Ill. The relationship between one- and two-surface cracks
was given by
18
2tR
( KI ) = 4 (48)
one - + ac
4_.
+ ac.
--
(KI)
two
crack _ tR cracks
Shah had assumed that the conversion factor was constant for all locations
along the crack front; that is, independent of the parametric angle.
comparison between the present results and those estimated by Shah Ill] for
Fsh, as a function of the parametric angle. The open symbols show the results
with the results estimated by Shah, but the equation is about 5 percent higher
(based on peak value) than the present results in the mid-region for the semi-
elliptic crack. Near the intersection of the crack front with the free surface
point, but lower at the surface. Also, the stress-intensity factors in the
interior region 0 < 2@/_ < 0.8 were unaffected by mesh refinement. Therefore,
the equation was fitted in the interior region (2¢/_ < 0.8) only. However, the
19
The influence of crack shape (a/c) on the distribution of boundary-
correction factors is shownin Figure lO. The open symbols showthe estimated
results from Shah [Ill. And the solid symbols show the present finite-element
results for a/c = 2. The solid curves show the results from the proposed
equation for a semi-elliptical surface crack at a hole with R/t = 0.5. The
bution of boundary-correction factors, Fsh, along the crack fron for two-
ratios. The proposed equation (solid curves) is generally within a few percent
crack front with the hole surface (¢ = _/2). Here, again, the proposed eq-
uation is expected to give a good estimate for the limiting behavior due to
finite plate, Figure 2e, subjected to tension was obtained by fitting to the
for 0.2 < a/c < 2, a/t < I, 0.5 < R/t < I, (R + c)/b < 0.5, and
2O
gl g2 g3 f¢ fw (50)
(a) (51)
0.89
M2 = -0.54 + (52)
0.2+ a
C
l
M 3 = 0.5 +14 1 -_-a )24 (53)
0.65 + a
C
1 +0.35 (54)
gl = l + [0.
where
C
(56)
1 + _cos (0.85 ¢)
(57)
21
Functions f¢ and fw are given by equations (I0) and (46), respectively.
(58)
M2 : 0.2 (_)
4 (59)
M3 = -O. ll Icl
4 (60)
Functions g2 and _ are given by equations (55) and (56). The function g3
is given by
_=(_
_ oo_c)I_+o_
_ cos
11
o-8
o2
I +
l'I
(62)
The functions f@ and fw are, again, given by equations (13) and (46),
respecti vely. •
Estimates for a single-corner crack.- The strips-intensity factors for _' ',
single-corner crack at a hole can be estimated from the present results for
Raju and Newman [14] have evaluated the use of the conversion factor for some
22 .
using the conversion factor were in good agreement with the results from Smith
Effects of plate thickness and crack shape.- Figures 12 and 13 show the
size (a/t) on the distribution are shown in Figure 12. The finite-element
results are shown as symbols and the proposed equation is shown as the solid
curves. Again, the equation is in good agreement with the finite-element re-
sults, except near ¢ = 0 and 7/2. Here again the boundary-layer effect [19],
Further mesh refinement in this region was shown in the Appendix to give higher
boundary-correction factors near the free surface, but lower values at the
regions.
correction factors are shown in Figure 13. Again, the proposed equation
the equations were within a few percent of the finite-element results. The
maximum error was about 5 percent, except where the crack front intersects a
free surface. For a/t > 0.8, the accuracy of the equations have not been
stress-intensity variations along the crack front were also included, but were
23
generally based on engineering estimates, Table 4 gives the range of applica-
bility of ¢, a/t, a/c, R/t, and (R + c)/b for the proposed equations.
24
CONCLUDING
REMARKS
the edge of a hole in finite plates. The empirical equations cover a wide
0.2 to 2, and the ratio of hole radius to plate thickness (R/t) ranged from
For all configurations for which ratios of crack depth to plate thickness
do not exceed 0.8, the equations are generally within 5 percent of the finite-
element results, except where the crack front intersects a free surface. Here
the proposed equations give higher stress-intensity factors than the finite-
element results, but these higher values probably represent the limiting be-
havior as the meshis refined near the free surface. For ratios greater than
0.8, no solutions are available for direct comparison; however, the equations
gated. The proposed equations were in good agreementwith someof the reported
results. For limiting cases, as crack-depth-to-plate thickness (a/t) or crack-
25
depth-to-crack length (a/c) approach limits, the proposed equations reduce to
exact or accepted solutions.
puting fracture toughness and fracture loads for these types of crack con-
figurations.
26
APPENDIX
Hartranft and Sih [19] proposed that the stress-intensity factors in a very
thin "boundary layer" near the intersection of the crack with a free surface
drop off rapidly and equal zero at the free surface. To investigate the
models had non-uniform wedges and were obtained by refining the 8-wedge model
near the free surface (¢ = 7/2). The smallest wedge angle for the lO- and 14-
wedge models were _/48 and _/180, respectively. The stress-intensity factors
obtained from the three models are shown in Figure 14. These results show that
the stress intensities near the free surface were affected by mesh refinement.
They were higher near the free surface but lower at the surface with smaller
Further mesh refinements near the free surface should give higher stress
intensities near the free surface but lower values at the surface. Thus, the
proposed equation (solid curve) is expected to give a good estimate for the
27
REFERENCES
['1] Irwin, G. R.: The Crack Extension Force for a Part-Through Crack in a
Plate, ASME, J. Appl. Mechs., VoI. 29, No. 4, 1962, pp. 651-654.
[2] Green, A. E,; and Sneddon, I. N.: The Distribution of Stress in the
[3] Smith, F. W.; Emery, A. F.; and Kobayashi, A. S.: Stress Intensity
J. Appl. Mechs., Vol. 34, No. 4, Trans. ASME, Vol. 89, Series E,
[5] Raju, I. S.; and Newman, J. C., Jr.. Stress-lntensity Factors for a
Engineering Fracture Mechanics J., Vol. II, No. 4, 1979, pp. 817-829.
[6] Newman, J. C., Jr.; and Raju, I. S.: Analyses of Surface Cracks in
Finite Plates Under Tension or Bending Loads, NASA TP-1578, Dec. 1979.
[7] Heliot, J.; Labbens, R.; and Pellissier-Tanon, A.: Benchmark Problem
pp. 340-343.
28
[9] Pickard, A. C.: Stress Intensity Factors for Cracks with Circular
[11] Shah, R. C.: Stress Intensity Factors for Through and Part-Through
STP-590, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1976, pp. 429-459.
[14] Raju, I. S.; and Newman, J. C., Jr.: Stress-lntensity Factors for Two
May 1977.
[16] Tada, H.; Paris, P. C.; and Irwin, G. R.: The Stress Analysis of Cracks
[17] Gross, B.; and Srawley, J. E.: Stress-lntensity Factors for Single-
29
[18] Newman, J. C., Jr.; and Raju, I. S.: An Empirical Stress-lntensity
Journal, 1981.
3O
TABLEl--Boundary correction factors, F, for embedded
elliptical crack in a plate subjected to tension.
(c/b _ 0.2; h/b = l; _ = 0.3)
a/t
a/c 2¢/_ 0.2 0.5 0.8
31
TABLE 2--Boundary correction factors, F, for corner
crack in a plate subjected to tension.
(c/b _ 0.2_ h/b = l; _ = 0.3)
a/t
32
TABLE 3--Boundary correction factors, F, for surface crack
at center of hole in a plate subjected to tension.
((R + c)/b _ 0.2; h/b > 1.6; v = 0.3)
(a) R/t = l
a/t
33
TABLE3--Boundary correction factors, F, for surface crack
at center of hole in a plate subjected to tension.
((R + c)/b _ 0.2; h/b > 1.6; = 0.3)
(b) R/t = 2
a/t
34
A
U v
N
+
0 0 0 0 0
V V V V V
v
c" 0 0
0
.f--
4-a
0 0
o-
£.
o
4.a
t)
0 0 0 0 0
4- U
>_ 0 0 _ OU CU
4.a
e-
e--
i
v v
4J
I-
o 0 0 0 0 0
4-
I
.p. I
.r-
u
•r"- e-
0
°r"
CO 'UD _0 CO 0'_
¢0 v ,-- c_ CO q:T
v v v I/)
v
0 LIJ
• %-
¢0 U
e_
I "j _ "Z
....-.,
I .I-.} (i} v + _
_ a._ _._ v
,-- _ .I-.} ,---
,--" _ 0 ,--
--J ¢- CL ,-- "I- 0
0 _-. _ "7"
°r- .,-. c-" I
I"- -,-" C _
£- U v ._
U v {,3 v
°p-
c- .tJ II
O
_ 0 -_ 0
• 35
S
2h
36
I"---- _ ------ I'-------'--'----
.:.:.....;.;_.;._....'...._.'_ ;: -_:...<;.
_+:.!-;"_
_._...-'..:..i
_:i _.:._..:-i.:._;',.
1 , ..,
_,_ :-.-_.:....... _ ; ;:'"",.':i.f!".::_-'!:i'-'_!.:.'.
s-
o t-
,,j
_- o
_ L
or,,-
"1_ op-
e-4__
o_=
,,_ e-
a,_ r--
N _
,-, !:: _ _ -ca :"i:_:_"::::.'_':!:!: I
.%i-.--- "i':_!'-_:__ o
..-'$'.:
:.?iY.'_:'.-"
'
_o_-
37
X
r..--
,-'t e-
T ^
¢J
°¢.=.
g.
4->
(..3 C3 ¢D
E
A
r_
v
L_"-_ o - :r _J
e-
°p..
X o
4_
e-
°r--
r--i
o
VI o
(.3 !
C_
_A
O I,
v
38
"o
"t3
"o
,,Q
E
c-
f,_
.Ca
,IJ
C3 .t-
• i o
L
)- .,.-...-. : T._,._ .:
t_
o
.
c_
c
o n
•I.-_ .Jo
u_
., QJ (.,)
L
o_'-
•'o u
_ "r"
oP,- _
! m
C::)
39
u
°j,--
,---I
+r.-
i-,..-
a,i
I
°r-
E
S.-
o
_i :+J..++l-- I -i
c
o
4-
_J
ro
L
u
t-
o
u
%-
LI.J
• r- C_
I... II
L
0.._
U_
tI" |1
0 U
O0
tO
0
e- U
• r- 5..
°r- U
L _
I
• r-- "_
0 i
Ii
4O
m_
o_ 0
<_E D , ..c: U
L
' II
-g
!
_ , . i:i_-:.-:!:::.
...-..:_ i:-::::;J_ ,4-,
'-' '- :/:.::!::-::.!:.....::;i!_iii_
g..z
t!
1.1
o ®N_
_" I|
/:_I,__
_g
// O _
C) m !
,--I ,--'t
,A
LI-
4]
,--4
I
.Q
C)
cJ
U_
42
1,1
IJJ
! !
C)
0
LL
43
I
e-
LL
44
A
® V
\ u_
\ s-
U o_
¢_ II
£.
LY_
r_
r-I _-- II
E
Q._ u
$-
o_-
_- o
0 °_"
u u
c
u t_
L 0
0 °_
I c
3_
¢'- 4-_
o"_
I
o_
¢.- r_
0
! If-
0 I
t--
¢/)
IJ-
45
,-"4
-I_1- t T
I.
cO
O0
c-
oo
! | r!
! !
0
LL
46
&.
U
!
_J
4_
&.
O"
&-
0
.Q C
O
&.
u v
_..- ¢Y
o_
L
0 !!
,3 U U
!o L.-J
(t)
(/)
q.)
Om
L
L4-_
co
t
4_
r--
(23 e- e--
E
J
q3
(1)
! 0
(13
4_
o_=_ 0 U
c
°_-=4
U_
m 1,-
°r- I_
! i !
c3 I
pr_
o
IJ_ ,A
U-
47
I
r_
0
u_
48
-3
I
CO O .._
4.-, ,--I ,--I
(--
° _,,,I
Qrn4]
OO LL
-4ol-- T
z',,..-
(',4
I I ] I I
I_ C_ r--I
t'--
It_
49
1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No.
NASA TM-83200
4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date
505-33-23-02
7, Author(s) 8. Performing Organzzation Report No.
15 Supplementary Notes
Presented at the ASTM 14th National Symposium on Fracture Mechanics, Los Angeles,
California, June 30 - July 2, 1981.
16 Abstract
19. S_urity Cla_if. (of this report) 20. _curity Classif. (of this _ge) 21. No. of Pages T 22. Price"