Doubting it, Carlos. But. I would go that.

He says, it seems kind of hearing,

though. But I would like to make me miss him insane. And they live in big.

I say setting a maze and yeah, they're very easy to get one head up and down. But
Mom and I, I, I, I can make it if they let it. And I think I, I have to make them
like us on Facebook and legislation that they say assimilationists making us
selfish.

But I. And this for me.

Yeah, I so I understand that what you're trying to do is that you're one to take
the Packers transistor and then make a calibration board to win the piece to be the
next front in the package transistor that you want to find out if you can do it
using the DSG broke to do the probing of the beam. Could be correct. Yes. Oh, yes.
Go, go. Go back one way or back one slide. So a couple details.

And if that is what you're going to do, there is one major issue here is that when
you design the structures on the ECB board that need to be embedding, you're going
to come down with PSG first. Now, the one issue for the he broke the plane charity,
the material you are probing, depending on what those problems are, who make right
and what style, it can be very difficult to measure.

I would make sure that the GST probe you have will work well on the PCV materials.
You are going to smoke it, the height variation, the variation in height, the
structure that they use for the BP weave of the material, how they weave it, it
changes the properties. Depending on where you are as you get higher in frequency.
Based on the thickness. But below two gigahertz. That is not good. But what's
interesting is that because I just want to make sure you do not damage this
approach.

It would be tight. But the other thing is, you look your equivalent micros here.
Where do your grounds. But I'm giving you a hint.

Them to beat the heat, Dalmeny. He is going to give me example. Oh, no. I think the
cool thing is if you come down on the screen. So it was a ground signal ground for
that one and whether the ground touched the ground and then the lack of any ground.

The mother ship.

But the problem is a ground no ground probe is one. One body. The probe taps all
three come down at one time and they contact only one plane. So the only contact of
the micro script line. So what I'm trying to get to is not one is a micro script
line as your simulation. You want to use ideally a grounded code plane or
waveguide. It is one of the options online help, because ideally, if you want to
have a good bignall integrity, a good RF signal path, you want to do two things.

You have to have the same as a micro trip with the ground plane underneath the
transmission line, the shielding from other layers, because let's say if you have a
system on a chip, you're going to have DC. You're going to have power. You're going
to allow the signal. And then you're going to have your RF line. Do you want to
shield the RF micro supplying the signal to reduce it? The second thing is because
the pope's body now has a down signal ground, you have to have the ground.

That connects port one to port to at the same height as the microstructure, which
means it becomes like a company in a way that. And so the hybrid of those two
structures using the ground plan under the microscope and the ground on the same
surface as the complainer we've got is the grounded Cokely in the way that
structure. And what that means is that it is almost like half. A rectangular
coaxial structure, essentially. The reason why we do that is no.
Like I said, it's to isolate the signal from other lines that are underneath that
are running in a multi layer. You see more. And the other thing is, and this is
critical in that work analysers, if you go back and you remember, did the
embedding. Yes. There is a fundamental assumption that the ground is the same
everywhere. If you do not put the coat point portion of the grounded coupling, the
waveguide structure on then the port one to port, two grounds are going to have to
be referenced back.