The network analyzer. Because you wouldn't be able to touch the ground here.

So
what would happen is all of the inductance and parasitic, even though you
calibrated out the uncertainty in that return path back to the instrument, there's
going to be greater than the parasitic. You're trying to measure. Which means
you're going to get junk food data, especially if you go above 15 to 20 gigahertz.
You're going to get nothing. It's not going to work. And I know because I've had
designers use the same thing in the past.

And this is on Wafer. This is even on wafer. It does not work. So a PCV is even
going to be more difficult. So you have to have the I would use a grounded code
plane or we get. Which means on the top level, you have a complaint or structure
that has ground and signal and then ground where the ground is the same for PT. one
as for two. And then we also have lawyers going from the core point or ground to
the ground point underneath the signal, the Miko's the microwave line.

So look at a grounded cleaner we've got. Yeah, I mean, the best measurement. Yes. I
am. I read about these and I know they they Kopplin in a guy in full design,
defying the makers, defying the. It is better. But I. I make the. The only the the.
Microfit widow. Yeah. Yeah. OK. When it comes to doing the simulations and trying
to do it practically, I would try to not.

It's not a complainer. We've got the grounded planner. We've got grounded. We're
going like a grounded complainer. We got to go. It has ground plane like micro
strip. But it that plus a co plane or waveguide combined because it is designed
that way. In 20 years it will have to do that. It will still work.

OK. Sorry. I hope you're right. Now where in the world. And it's continue a
collaboration, I think, collaboration in the Coplin our. And just microsleep must
be the same way. But in the Stender, through a way, it is only that the innovation
quave is and must be to a degree in the standards of living. And the lank can be
anything they show to seek it or a partnership with. But I Monday the most papers
recommend for high frequency make a determination in the short term and the length
of the standard line must be the same.

I understand that. But I live in London over four. OK. So based on that, will this
word. Using only one line. Two hundred megahertz to three gigahertz. Will that work
only using one line? OK. You want to make sure when when you do the doors, the key
is what I'm trying to say is keep in mind, whenever you select a calibration
frequency range, you make sure to verify that the start to stop frequency ratio.

Is within the bandwidth of the lamda by four, including the line, because as you
increase the bandwidth of your measurement, you need more lines. Yes. Bend with
ease and a good one, I think. Approximately, yeah, but it's something to really
keep in mind because I've seen people do these here standards before and they make
errors in the maps and the resolution that they go one to eight and it'll be OK.
And then all of a sudden they get close to the edge and the practical roll off in
the net, what kind of lies or other things gives them issues.

So. But yeah, you should be OK. I wanted to make sure you were aware of the one to
eight ratio approximately. Mm hmm. Mm hmm. Looking good. Yeah. That's the standard.
But I will explain this later. And then because the the the first the standard that
one makes is the length of time and the length and then a one. Configures. And to
make. Ninety degree and delaying. Lane. And then the way.

So Mike Quigley, in that sense of frequency, a half, nearly 50 50 of Impey, that's

got to be correct that. And. And this is the wave length and the. And the other
line. That they.