Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exercise 9.1. In this exercise, our goal is to show that the Hausdorff condition is not necessarily preserved by
taking quotient spaces. We will do this by constructing a topological space, the line with two origins, which is
homeomorphic to a quotient of a Hausdorff space yet not Hausdorff itself.
(i) Let Y = R ∪ {00 } be the real numbers union an additional point, which we call 00 (the “second origin”).
Equip Y with the following topology: any open subset of R r {0} is open when thought of as a subset of
Y , and if U ⊂ R is any open subset of R containing 0, then U , U r {0} ∪ {00 } and U ∪ {00 } are all open
in Y . In other words, U ⊂ Y is open if and only if one of the following two conditions hold:
• U contains neither 0 nor 00, and U is open in R; or
• U contains one or both of 0 and 00, and the result of replacing these elements by the single element
0, (U r {0, 00 }) ∪ {0}, is an open subset of R.
You may assume that this defines a topology; we call the resulting topological space Y the line with two
origins. If it is helpful you may assume that the topology on Y is generated by the following basis B:
B = {(a, b) ⊂ R r {0} ⊂ Y } ∪ {(−r, r ) ⊂ R ⊂ Y } ∪ {(−r, 0) ∪ {00 } ∪ (0, r ) ⊂ Y },
in other words, B consists of all open intervals avoiding 0 entirely, open intervals containing 0, and
open intervals containing 0 with 0 replaced by 00.
Prove that (Y , TY ) is not Hausdorff.
(ii) Let X = {(x, i) ∈ R2 : i ∈ {0, 1} be the union of the two lines y = 0 and y = 1 with the induced topology
from R2 . Note that X is Hausdorff, as more generally any subspace of a Hausdorff space is Hausdorff.
Let X be the following partition of X : the set X consists of the sets {(x, 0), (x, 1)} for each x ∈ R r {0},
as well as {(0, 0)} and {(1, 0)}. We might say, as we did in class, that X is the quotient of X by the
equivalence relation “generated by” (x, 0) ∼ (x, 1) for all x , 0.
Equip X with its quotient topology induced by X and the natural map p : X X . Prove that X is
homeomorphic to Y , the line with two origins described in (i). Hence, X is not Hausdorff.
Solution.
(i) Suppose U is any open neighborhood of 0 in Y . By the definition of TY it follows that U must contain
a small open interval (−ε, ε) ⊂ R. Now, if V is an open neighborhood of 00, then there similarly must
be some ε 0 > 0 such that (−ε 0, 0) ∪ {00 } ∪ (0, ε 0 ) ⊂ V . But if r = min{ε, ε 0 } > 0 then (0, r ) ⊂ U ∩ V . In
particular, U ∩ V , ∅. This means that 0 and 00 cannot be separated by open sets in Y .
(ii) First consider the map
(x, i) x whenever x , 0
f:X Y , (0, 0) 0
(0, 1)
00 .
This map is in fact continuous: Suppose U ⊂ Y is open. If U ⊂ R r {0} and U is open in R, then
f −1 (U ) = U × {0, 1} ⊂ X is open in X . If U contains 0 or 00 then by definition V = (U r {00 }) ∪ {0} is an
open subset of R. The preimage f −1 (U ) is one of V × {0, 1}, (V × {0, 1}) r {(0, 0)} or (V × {0, 1}) r {(0, 1)}.
Since both {(0, 0)} and {(0, 1)} are closed in R2 all of these sets are open subsets of X and therefore
f −1 (U ) is open in all cases.
Notice that f (x, 0) = f (x, 1) for x , 0. This means that f respects the equivalence relation defining X
and there is a unique continuous map f : X Y with f ◦ p = f .
In the other direction, define
x {(x, 0), (x, 1)} whenever x , 0 and x , 00
д: Y X, 0 {(0, 0)}
00
{(0, 1)}.
1
Then one sees immediately that f ◦ д = idY and д ◦ f = idX , so we only need to check that д is
continuous. Suppose U ⊂ X is open. First, assume that {(0, 0)}, {(0, 1)} < U . Then p −1 (U ) = V × {0, 1}
for some open set V ⊂ R r {0} and д−1 (U ) = V is open in Y . If {(0, 0)} ∈ U or {(0, 1)} ∈ U then p −1 (U ) is
of the form V × {0, 1}, (V × {0, 1}) r {(0, 0)} or (V × {0, 1}) r {(0, 1)} for some open set V ⊂ R containing
0. This means that д−1 (U ) is one of V ∪ {00 }, (V r {0}) ∪ {00 } or V respectively. All of these sets are
open in Y and we can conclude that д is continuous.
In summary, we have found a continuous map f : X Y with a continuous inverse д : Y X and
there X and Y are homeomorphic.
Exercise 9.2. Let X = R2 r {0} be the plane minus the origin, with the usual (subspace) topology. Let X
be the partition of X consisting of sets {(2n x, 2ny) : n ∈ Z}. Namely, two points are in the same set of the
partition if and only if one is obtained from the other one by multiplication by a power of 2.
Let p : X X be the quotient map, and endow X with the quotient topology induced by X and p.
(i) Consider the map f : X S 1 × S 1 ⊂ R2 × R2 defined by
2π 2π √ log r
q
log x 2 + y 2 = log(r a 2 + b 2 ) = 2π = ϕ.
log 2 log 2 log 2
Consequently, f (x, y) = ((a, b), (c, d )).
Next, assume that (x 0, y 0 ) = 2n (x, y) ∈ X for some n ∈ Z. Then
(x 0, y 0 ) 2n (x, y) (x, y)
=p =p
22n x 2 + 22ny 2 x 2 + y2
q
x 02 + y 02
2π 2π 2π 2π
q q q
log x 02 + y 02 = log 2n x 2 + y 2 = log 2n + log x 2 + y 2 =
log 2 log 2 log 2 log 2
2π
q
= 2πn + log x 2 + y 2 .
log 2
But cos and sin are periodic with period 2π . Hence, f (x 0, y 0 ) = f (x, y). Conversely, suppose that
f (x 0, y 0 ) = f (x, y) for (x, y), (x 0, y 0 ) ∈ X . Then we have
q q !
2π 2 2 2π 2 2
cos log 2 log x + y = cos log 2 log x + y0 0
and !
q q
2π 2π 2 2
sin log 2 log x 2 + y 2 = sin log 2 log x + y .
0 0
2
The function ϕ (cos ϕ, sin ϕ) is periodic with period 2π and injective on [0, 2π ). Therefore there
must be some n ∈ Z with
2π 2π
q q
2 2
log x + y + 2πn = log x 02 + y 02 .
log 2 log 2
2π 2π
q q
log 22n x 2 + 22ny 2 = log x 02 + y 02 .
log 2 log 2
The logarithm and the square root are injective functions R >0 R, so this let’s us conclude that
22n (x 2 +y 2 ) = x 02 +y 02 . But now, writing f (a, b) = ( f 1 (a, b), f 2 (a, b)) and remembering our assumption
that f (x, y) = f (x 0, y 0 ) we can compute
(x, y) (x, y)
q q q
2n (x, y) = 2n x 2 + y 2 p = 22n x 2 + 22ny 2 p = x 02 + y 02 f 1 (x, y) =
x 2 + y2 x 2 + y2
(x , y )
0 0
q q
= x 02 + y 02 f 1 (x 0, y 0 ) = x 02 + y 02 q =
x 02 + y 02
= (x 0, y 0 ).
In summary, we have f (x, y) = f (x 0, y 0 ) for (x, y), (x 0, y 0 ) ∈ X if and only if there is some n ∈ Z with
2n (x, y) = (x 0, y 0 ). This implies that f : X S 1 × S 1 descends to a bijection f : X S 1 × S 1 with
f = f ◦ p. Furthermore, this map f is continuous because f was continuous and X carries the quotient
topology.
(ii) Consider the closed annulus A = B(0, 2) r B(0, 1) ⊂ R2 r {0}. This set is both closed and bounded
and therefore compact by Heine–Borel. So it will suffice to show that p(A) p = X in order to conclude
2
that X is compact. For this, suppose that (x, y) ∈ R r {0} and write r = x 2 + y 2 . Then there is some
integer n ∈ Z such that 2n ≤ r ≤ 2n+1 . But this means that 2−n (x, y) ∈ A and p(x, y) = p(2−n (x, y)).
Consequently, for any p(x, y) ∈ X there is (x 0, y 0 ) ∈ A such that p(x 0, y 0 ) = p(x, y). In other words,
p(A) = X .
(iii) We have a continuous bijection f : X S 1 × S 1 from the compact space X to the Hausdorff space
S 1 × S 1 . Any such map must be a homeomorphism.