AFFIDAVIT

OF
NOTICE
"CERTIFICATE .OF AUTHORITY
OF ASSUMED NAME CERTIFICATE"

One, Rice; Myron Charles, Captain of vessel, the living Man of the "MYRON CHARLES
RICE" EST ATE, have not abandon the vessel. I certify that the statements in this document are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

1. The "Assumed Name Certificate" is notary seal, "Certificate of Acknowledgment" in

the "State of Michigan", "County of Wayne" (dated: January 9, 201 7).
2. The "State of Michigan" Authentication seal is a "Certificate of Authority" recording
by Secretary of State, Ms Ruth A. Johnson (191097-1-493 147- 157).
3. The "Assumed Name Certificate" Authentication makes the document a public record.
4. The "Assumed Name Certificate" Authentication makes the "record in due form of
law" in Michigan.
5. The "Assumed Name Certificate" Authentication proves a fact and removes any doubts.

Bouvier Dictionary expression defined on Doubt:

4. No judge is presumed to have any doubt on a question of law, and he cannot
therefore refuse to give a judgment on that account.

9 MR. 355; Merlin, Repert. h.t.; Aylijfe's Pand. b. 2, t. 17; Dig lib. 34, t. 5; Code,
lib. 6, t. 38. Indeed, in some countries; in China, f or example, ignorance of the law in
a judge is punishable with blows. Penal Laws of China, B. 2, s. 61.

6. The "Assumed Name Certificate" is recorded in the "State of Minnesota" (File Number
919959200024, December 12, 2016).
7. The "Assumed Name Certificate" is recorded by State of Minnesota's Secretary of State
Mr. Steve Simon.
8. The "Assumed Name Certificate" should be given full faith and credit in all Courts of
justice and elsewhere.
9. The "Assumed Name Certificate" is issued by the State, therefore State property shall be
protected under the Sovereign Immunity Act and 11th amendment.
,---
10. The "Assumed Name Certificate" is also protected as Industrial Property and State
Property reference by T r eaties and United Nation Conventions:

PROTECTION OF IN D USTRIAL PROPERTY

Convention signed at The Hague November 6, J 925 .

Senate advice and consent to ratification December 16, 1930
Ratified by the President of the United States December 27, 1930
Ratification of the United States deposited at Bern January 22, 1931
N otification of United States deposit given by Switzerland to other parties F ebruary
6, 1931.
Entered into force June 1, 1928; for the United States March 6, 1931 Proclaimed
by the President of the United States March 6, 1931
Replaced by conventions of June 2, 1934, 1 and October 31, 1958, 2 as be-
tween contracting parties to the later conventions'
4 7 Stat. 1789; Treaty Series 834

The Presiden t of the U nited St a tes of A merica :

M r. T homas E. Robertson, Commissioner of P atents, M ember of the B ar of the
Supreme Court of the United States;
Mr. W allace R . L ane, former President of the American and Chicago
Patent L aw Associations, M ember of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United
States and the Supreme Court of Illinois ; Mr. Jo. Baily B rown, P ittsburgh, M ember
of the B ar of the Supreme Court of the U nited States and the Supreme Court of
P ennsylvania;

W ho, having communicated to each other their respective full powers , whic h were
foun d to be in good and due form, have agreed upon the following articles :

ARTICLE 1
T he contracting countries constitute themselves into a union for the protection o f
industrial property .

lThe scope of the pFotection of industtfal property includes patents, utility models,
·ndustrial designs and models, trade-marks, commercial names and indications o
orig in, or aJ:>pellations of origin, as wen as the re ression of unfair com etition.

Industrial property is to be understood in the broadest meanin g a n d is to be applied not

only to industry and commerce as such, but likewise to agricultural industries (wines,
grain, tobacco leaves, fruit, cattle, etc.) and extractive industries (minerals, mineral
w aters, etc.).

1 The Paris Convention for the Protection of

Industrial Property of 1883

Article I of the Paris Convention {Stockholm Act of 1967) stipulates that '"The rotection of industrial
property has as its object patents, utility models, industrial desi en ~ trademarks, service marks, trad
names, indications of source or appellations of origin, aud the repression of unfair.
 United Nations General Assembly
30 November 2004
https://treaties.un.o1{doc/source/docs/A 5,9 508-E.pdf
Microsoft Word - 04 0337e.doc

Part II
General principles

Article 5
State immunity
A State enjoys immunity, in respect of itself and its property, from the
jurisdiction of the courts of another State subject to the rovisions of the resent
Convention.

Article 6
Modalities for giving effect to State immunity
1. A State shall give effect to State immunity under article 5 by refraining from
exercising jurisdiction in a proceeding before its courts against another State and to
that end shall ensure that its courts determine on their own initiative that th~
immunity of that other State under article 5 is respected.
2. A proceeding before a court of a State shall be considered to have been
instituted against another State if that other State:
(a) is named as a party to that proceeding; or
(b) is not named as a party to the proceeding but the proceeding in
effect seeks to affect the property, rights, interests or activities of that other
State.

I certified the above statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

f - 13 ~ /7
Rice; myron charles, Private International Organization (#RC048080135US)

State of Michigan )
) SS

County of Wayne )
\ . .day of
SUBSCRIBED AND AFFIRMED, before me with a passport ID, on thi ~ l"'"r\
{) h._
January , 2017.

&.2
· Notary Print Name
'
I- 1'J·- 1-r
Date

GREG SANDS JR.

Seal:

NOfARV PUBLIC· STATE OF MICHIGAN

COUNTY OF WAYNE
My Commission Expires. Ma~
Acting in the Coun of