Professional Documents
Culture Documents
High-Pressure Uid-Phase Equilibria: Experimental Methods and Systems Investigated (2005-2008)
High-Pressure Uid-Phase Equilibria: Experimental Methods and Systems Investigated (2005-2008)
Review
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: A review of systems is given, for which experimental high-pressure phase-equilibrium data were pub-
Received 11 August 2010 lished in the period between 2005 and 2008, continuing a series of reviews. To find candidates for articles
Received in revised form 3 September 2010 that are of interest for this survey a three-stage search strategy was used including a systematic search of
Accepted 7 September 2010
the contents of the 17 most important journals of the field. Experimental methods for the investigation
Available online 25 September 2010
of high-pressure phase equilibria were classified, described and illustrated using examples from arti-
cles of the period between 2005 and 2008. For the systems investigated, the reference, the temperature
Keywords:
and pressure range of the data, and the experimental method used for the measurements is given in 54
Experimental equipment
Data
tables. Vapor–liquid equilibria, liquid–liquid equilibria, vapor–liquid–liquid equilibria, solid–liquid equi-
Method libria, solid–vapor equilibria, solid–vapor–liquid equilibria, critical points, the solubility of high-boiling
High pressure VLE review substances in supercritical fluids, the solubility of gases in liquids and the solubility (sorption) of volatile
Hydrocarbons components in polymers are included. Most of experimental data in the literature has been given for
Non-hydrocarbons binary systems. Of the 1469 binary systems, 796 (54%) have carbon dioxide as one of the components.
Information on 206 pure components, 535 ternary systems of which 355 (66%) contain carbon dioxide,
163 multicomponent and complex systems, and 207 systems with hydrates is given. A continuation of
the review series is planned, covering the years from 2009 to 2011.
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Literature search and evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. Experimental methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. Analytical methods (An) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1.1. Analytical isothermal methods (AnT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1.2. Analytical isobaric–isothermal methods (AnPT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.1.3. Analytical isobaric methods (AnP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3.1.4. Analytical spectroscopic methods (AnSpec) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3.1.5. Analytical gravimetric methods (AnGrav) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.1.6. Other analytical methods (AnOth) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
3.2. Synthetic methods (Syn) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
3.2.1. Synthetic-visual methods (SynVis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
3.2.2. Synthetic-non-visual methods (SynNon) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
3.2.3. Synthetic-isothermal methods (SynT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
3.2.4. Synthetic-isobaric methods (SynP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
3.2.5. Other synthetic methods (SynOth) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
∗ Corresponding author at: Bayer Technology Services GmbH, Fluid Properties & Thermodynamics, BTS-PT-RPT-KPM, Geb. B310 Room 609, D-51368 Leverkusen,
Germany. Tel.: +49 214 30 21787; fax: +49 214 30 81554.
E-mail address: ralf.dohrn@bayer.com (R. Dohrn).
0378-3812/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.fluid.2010.09.017
2 J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69
1. Introduction like Schwarz et al. [17] for ethane + n-alkane systems, or for a spe-
cific substance, like Abdulagatov et al. [18] for methanol or Loerting
Knowledge of high-pressure phase equilibria is important for et al. [19] for phase transitions of ice. Other reviews cover high-
the understanding of technical and natural processes that occur pressure fluid-phase equilibria data that have been published in
at high pressures. It is essential for the design and optimization of specific periods, e.g. Knapp et al. [20] covering 1900–1980, Fornari
high-pressure chemical processes and separation operations. Other et al. [21] covering 1978–1987, Dohrn and Brunner [22] cover-
examples for the need of high-pressure phase equilibrium data are ing 1988–1993, Christov and Dohrn [23] covering 1994–1999, and
the simulation of petroleum reservoirs, enhanced oil recovery, car- Dohrn et al. [6] covering 2000–2004. This work gives an overview
bon capture and storage, the transportation and storage of natural about systems for which high-pressure phase equilibrium data
gas, refrigeration and heat-pump cycles, and the study of geologi- have been published from 2005 to 2008, including vapor–liquid
cal processes. There are several established and new applications of equilibria (VLE), liquid–liquid equilibria (LLE), vapor–liquid–liquid
supercritical fluids [1,2], like extraction, particle formation, impreg- equilibria (VLLE), the solubility of high-boiling substances in super-
nation (wood preservation, polymers, catalysts, textiles), leather, critical fluids, and the solubility of gases in liquids (GLE). Work on
paper and textile treatment, dyeing, cleaning, reaction, chromatog- the continuation of the review series is under way, covering the
raphy, drying of aerogel, injection molding and extrusion, and period between 2009 and 2011.
electronic chip manufacturing. Examples of new applications are
given in the recent review of Brunner [3]. A critical review of the 2. Literature search and evaluation
present state and future directions of supercritical fluid science and
technology is given in the 20th anniversary special issue of The To find the articles that are of interest for this review, a three-
Journal of Supercritical Fluids [4]. stage search strategy was applied. A detailed description of this
Although the patent review on supercritical fluid technology strategy can be found in our previous review [6]. The main source
of Schütz [5] showed that the number of patents applications on of information were the most important journals in the field of
supercritical fluids reached a maximum in 2002, the number of high-pressure phase equilibria, as listed in Table 1; abbreviation of
publications in this field is still increasing, e.g. the total number of journal titles were used according to ISO 4 [24]. In addition to the 13
publications in The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. Other reasons for journals that were systematically covered in our previous review,
the high number of publications on high-pressure phase equilibria we added 4 journals: Thermochimica Acta, International Journal of
are a rising interest in ionic liquid applications at high pressures, Refrigeration, Journal of Cellular Plastics and Separation Science and
in hydrate formation and in polymer foaming processes. Gas solu- Technology. The latter journal yielded only one relevant article and
bility in the polymer plays a significant role in almost all stages of will not be continued in the future review, planned to cover the
the foaming process including the gas dissolution at compounding period 2009–2011. The table of contents of the journals of Table 1
temperatures and pressures, bubble nucleation, and growth and were systematically searched. Conference proceedings were not
partitioning between cells and matrix for cell structure stabiliza- considered, but articles from other journals that came to our knowl-
tion. The search for new solvents for carbon dioxide (CO2 ) capture edge were included. During the evaluation process of more than
also increased the number of publications on high-pressure phase 800 articles of interest, about 5% of the papers were found to be
equilibria. irrelevant for this review, since they contain neither new experi-
There are many ways to obtain information about the phase mental data nor the description of a new experimental apparatus, or
behavior of fluid mixtures, but the direct measurement of phase- the measured data were not “high pressure”. Of course, the expres-
equilibrium data remains an important source of information, sion “high pressure” is relative; we chose 1 MPa as the lower limit:
though it is difficult and expensive to take precise experimental a paper was considered to contain high-pressure data if at least one
data. On the other hand, for a company, it is very often more expen- data point was measured at a pressure of 1 MPa or higher.
sive to use imprecise data or to estimate data a couple of times over The increase of interest in high-pressure phase equilibria con-
the years, if experimental data are not available. tinued from 2005 to 2008 but first signs of a slowing down of this
An overview on review articles about techniques for exper- process can be seen. In Table 1 the number of papers published
imental investigations and about reviews on high-pressure in different journals from 1978 to 1987 [21] is compared with the
phase-equilibrium data in the literature has been given in the pre- number published from 1988 to 1993 [22], from 1994 to 1999 [23],
vious article of this series [6]. From the reviews on experimental from 2000 to 2004 [6] and from 2005 to 2008 (this work). While in
methods that appeared after 2004 the articles of Knox [2], Richon the early 1980s about 20 articles on high-pressure phase equilib-
[7], Smith and Fang [8], and Dohrn et al. [6] shall be mentioned. ria were published each year, this number increases by 6–7 each
Some reviews on experimental data in the literature cover a year, so that in 2008 more than 10 times as many articles appeared
specific topic, such as the phase behavior of ionic liquids with super- as in 1982. Fig. 1 shows an almost linear increase of articles on
critical fluids, e.g. Keskin et al. [9], the critical properties of elements high-pressure phase equilibria published per year during the last
and compounds, e.g. Marsh et al. [10,11], the solubility of certain 30 years.
substances in supercritical CO2 , e.g. Gücli-Üstündag and Temelli Authors tend to submit their publications on high-pressure
[12,13] for lipids, Su and Chen [14] for pharmaceutical compounds, phase equilibrium data to a rather limited number of mostly spe-
or the solubility of inorganic and organic compounds in liquids at cialized journals. More than 80% of the information was published
high pressures, e.g. Sawamura [15], for high-pressure gas hydrates, in the three major journals of high-pressure phase equilibria: Jour-
e.g. Loveday and Nelmes [16], for a certain class of binary systems, nal of Chemical Engineering Data, Fluid Phase Equilibria, and The
J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69 3
225 fluid extraction, can be large and contain several functional groups.
Therefore, the experimental investigation is often the only suitable
200
method to precisely determine the high-pressure phase behav-
175 ior. Many different methods are used to measure high-pressure
Number of articles/year
Table 1
Bibliographic information.
Abbreviation of journal titles according to ISO 4 [24], (–): not covered in the review of the period.
a
Fornari et al. [21].
b
Dohrn and Brunner [22].
c
Christov and Dohrn [23].
d
Dohrn et al. [6].
e
This work.
f
The first issue of The Journal of Supercritical Fluids appeared in 1988.
g
The first issue of Green Chemistry appeared in 1999.
h
Before 1999: Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für Physikalische Chemie and J. of the Chemical Society/Faraday Transactions.
4 J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69
Table 2
Experimental methods: abbreviations and frequency of use in review period.
cially available electrobalances became more prevalent, analytical significantly. This pressure drop can be avoided by different mea-
gravimetic methods have been used significantly more frequently sures, e.g by decreasing the cell volume during sampling by using a
(5.0% of all systems) as compared to the period 2000–2004 (1.1% of variable-volume cell (Var) like in the new VLE apparatus of Raal
all systems), being the only analytical method whose usage did not and coworkers [25], or by blocking off (Blo) the sampling vol-
decline. ume from the remaining content of the equilibrium cell before
In Tables 3–56, listing the investigated systems, information on pressure reduction [26,27]. If only a small sample is withdrawn
the experimental method used to determine the data is included. or if a relatively large equilibrium cell is used, the slight pres-
sure drop does not affect the phase compositions significantly.
The largest equilibrium cell described in an article within this
3.1. Analytical methods (An) review had a volume of 40 dm3 . It was used by van der Kraan
et al. [28] for the measurement of the partitioning of C.I. Disperse
Analytical methods (designated with An) involve the analyti- Orange 3 between CO2 and poly(ethylene terephtalate) textile
cal determination of the compositions of the coexisting phases. cloth.
When the equilibrium cell is filled with the components at the Small samples can be withdrawn using capillaries (Cap) or
beginning of the experiment, the overall composition of the mix- special sampling valves (Val), e.g. using HPLC-valves, or fast-
ture does not need to be precisely known, only so far that the acting electromagnetic or pneumatic valves, like the rapid on-line
mixture under desired conditions (p and T) separates into two sampler-injector of Richon and coworkers [29]. Often sampling
or more phases that are to be investigated, e.g. into a liquid valves are directly coupled to analytical equipment, in most cases
and a vapor phase when VLE is to be measured. The composi- to a gas chromatograph [30], but also to a high-performance liquid
tion of the phases is analyzed either with sampling and analysis chromatograph, or a supercritical fluid chromatograph.
under ambient pressure or without sampling by using physico- The smallest equilibrium cell described in an article within this
chemical methods of analysis inside the equilibrium cell under review had a volume of only 1 cm3 and was used by Yamini and
pressure. coworkers [31,32]. From this cell they took a sample-volume of
Analytical methods with sampling can be classified, depend- 102 mm3 which is the largest relative sample (10%) from a constant
ing on the attainment of equilibrium, into isothermal methods volume cell [32].
(AnT), isobaric–isothermal methods (AnPT) and isobaric methods Sometimes, equilibrium cells used for analytical methods are
(AnP). Withdrawing a large sample from an autoclave causes a equipped with one or more windows for visual observation of the
considerable pressure drop, which disturbs the phase equilibrium
J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69 5
Table 3
Pure-component systems: X.
Table 3 (Continued)
Table 3 (Continued)
Table 3 (Continued)
cell content (Vis). Secuianu et al. [33] used a variable volume cell The main advantage of analytical methods is that they can be
with two sapphire windows where one of the windows acts as a used for systems with more than two components without sig-
piston. nificant complications. When the compositions of all phases are
Analytical methods without sampling can be realized using a analyzed, each experiment yields complete information on the tie-
physicochemical method of analysis inside the equilibrium cell line(s).
under pressure. This can be spectroscopic methods (AnSpec), e.g.
Koglbauer and Wendland [34], gravimetric methods (AnGrav), e.g. 3.1.1. Analytical isothermal methods (AnT)
C.B. Li et al. [35], or other methods (AnOth), e.g. Hussain et al. [36] Characteristic for isothermal methods is that the temperature
who used a quartz crystal microbalance. These methods avoid the of the system stays constant during the equilibration process, e.g.
problems related to sampling from a high-pressure cell. when the system is in contact with a heat reservoir. The other equi-
J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69 9
Table 4
Binary systems: carbon dioxide + X.
Table 4 (Continued)
Table 4 (Continued)
Table 4 (Continued)
Table 4 (Continued)
Table 4 (Continued)
Table 4 (Continued)
Table 4 (Continued)
Table 4 (Continued)
Methyltrioctylammonium bromide [MTOAm] [Br] Scurto et al. [648] 292–292 4–4 n.a. SynVis
Methyltrioctylammonium triflate [MTOAm] [Tfo] Scurto et al. [648] 296–296 3.5–3.5 n.a. SynVis
Methyl-tris(2-methyl-propyl)ammonium triflate [TiBMAm] [Tfo] Scurto et al. [648] 327–327 15–15 n.a. SynVis
Modified phosphines DPPE Li et al. [497] 323–323 16.9–16.9 50 SynVis
Modified poly(propylene oxide) Ac–PPO Li et al. [497] 308–328 8.1–13.7 50 SynVis
Modified poly(propylene oxide) Ac–PPO–Ac Li et al. [497] 308–328 7.5–12.8 50 SynVis
Modified poly(propylene oxide) TMS–PPO (Mw 1000) Li et al. [497] 308–328 16–18 50 SynVis
Modified poly(propylene oxide) TMS–PPO (Mw 2000) Li et al. [497] 308–328 20–23 50 SynVis
Modified poly(propylene oxide) TMS–PPO (Mw 400) Li et al. [497] 308–328 7.6–12.4 50 SynVis
Modified poly(propylene oxide) TMS–PPO–Ac Li et al. [497] 308–328 7.7–12.5 50 SynVis
Modified poly(propylene oxide) TMS–PPO–TMS Li et al. [497] 308–328 7.6–12.3 50 SynVis
m-Xylene Knez et al. [430] 313–353 0.7–10.3 500 AnTVLcirVis
N,N,N ,N -Teraethyl-3-oxapentanediamide Koh et al. [435] 313–313 9.3–11.8 22.4 SynVisVar
N,N,N ,N -Tetra-n-butyl-3-oxapentanediamide Koh et al. [435] 313–313 9.3–11.5 22.4 SynVisVar
N,N,N ,N -Tetra-n-butyl-3-oxapentanediamide/nitric acid/Uranium Koh et al. [435] 293–313 7–35 22.4 SynVisVar
Komplex
N,N,N ,N -Tetra-n-butyl-3-oxapentanediamide/nitric acid Komplex Koh et al. [435] 293–313 7–35 22.4 SynVisVar
N,N,N ,N -Tetrahexyl-3-osxapentanediamide Koh et al. [435] 313–313 11.2–12.8 22.4 SynVisVar
N,N,N ,N -Tetraoctyl-3-oxapentanediamide Koh et al. [435] 313–313 11.5–13.6 22.4 SynVisVar
N,N,N-Trimethylbutylammonium Muldoon et al. [84] 333–333 0.1–1.3 n.a. AnGrav
bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide [N4111] [Tf2N]
Muldoon et al. [84] 333–333 1.3–9 n.a. SynT
N,N-Dimethylacrylamide Santos et al. [630] 303–358 5–16.5 28 SynVisVar
Nabumetone Su and Chen [696] 308–328 10–22 150 AnPTSemY
N-Acetyl-l-phenylalanine (AP) Freitag et al. [304] 308–308 7.8–23.5 10 AnPTSemY
N-Acetyl-l-phenylalanine ethyl ester (APEE) Freitag et al. [304] 308–328 7.8–23.5 10 AnPTSemY
N-Acetyl-l-tyrosine (AT) Freitag et al. [304] 308–308 7.8–23.5 10 AnPTSemY
N-Acetyl-l-tyrosine ethyl ester (ATEE) Freitag et al. [304] 308–308 7.8–23.5 10 AnPTSemY
Naphthalene Bertakis et al. [189] 333–353 0.1–23.1 50 SynVisVar
Dahmen et al. [241] 328–328 10–12 10 AnPTSemY
Fu et al. [307] 313–333 8–10 n.a. AnTVal
Harris et al. [339] 372–430 0–20.8 112.82 SynT
Harris et al. [339] 372–430 18.5–23.4 112.82 SynVis
Khimeche et al. [421] 308–333 10–19.6 n.a. AnPTSemY
Perez et al. [600] 308–328 5–25 15 SynVisVar
Ravipaty et al. [611] 308–308 9.8–19.9 1.6 AnPTSemYVal
Scurto et al. [648] 328–353 0.1–22.2 n.a. SynVisVar
Suleiman et al. [68] 308–308 12–28 n.a. AnPTChro
Suleiman et al. [68] 308–308 20–20 n.a. AnPTSemY
Vyhmeister et al. 307–307 8.8–8.8 n.a. SynVisVarPc
[751]
Zúñiga-Moreno et al. 313–328 8.7–20.5 n.a. SynVisVar
[817]
N-CBZ-l-phenylalanine(CBZ-P) Freitag et al. [304] 308–308 7.8–23.5 10 AnPTSemY
N-CBZ-l-tyrosine (CBZ-T) Freitag et al. [304] 308–308 7.8–23.5 10 AnPTSemY
n-Decane Ayirala and Rao [129] 310–310 0.1–8 n.a. SynNon
Jiménez-Gallegos 319–372 3.4–16 40 AnTCapValVis
et al. [391]
Polikhronidi et al. 377–460 16.2–18.2 n.a. SynOthPcTc
[155]
Ren and Scurto [141] 344–344 1.7–10.1 5.72 SynTVis
Ren and Scurto [141] 344–344 1.7–10.1 5.72 SynTVis
n-Heptane Ke et al. [140] 300–338 6.3–10.3 320 SynNonPcTc
Mutelet et al. [564] 310–413 2.3–13.4 12.4 SynVisVar
n-Hexadecane Venter et al. [738] 313–333 2–22 500 AnT
n-Hexane Lay et al. [478] 293–308 1.7–7.3 130 AnTVisVar
Wang et al. [753] 323–333 7.2–9.2 n.a. SynVisVar
Nickel(II) acetylacetonatea Aschenbrenner et al. 333–333 10–30 10 AnPTSemY
[177]
Nitrendipine Weinstein et al. [762] 298–318 8–25.1 30 SynVisVar
Weinstein et al. [762] 298–318 8–25.1 2.7 AnSpec
Nitromethane Lazzaroni et al. [479] 298–313 0.5–7.1 150 SynTVis
Nitrous oxide Di Nicola et al. [258] 214–281 0.4–4.1 273.5 SynT
N-Methyl caprolactam Kwon et al. [473] 323–353 5.6–19.6 25 SynVisVar
N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone Lazzaroni et al. [479] 313–313 0.7–7.7 150 SynTVis
n-Nonane Camacho-Camacho 315–418 2–16.7 100 AnTCapValVis
et al. [209]
n-Octane Jiménez-Gallegos 322–372 2–13.7 40 AnTCapValVis
et al. [391]
Yu et al. [781] 313–393 1.1–14.4 100 AnTCapVisVarPcTc
Nonanoic acid (pelargonic acid) Sparks et al. [690] 313–333 10–30 100 AnPTSemY
n-Pentadecane Secuianu et al. [649] 298–316 0.5–12.7 60 AnTVisVar
N-Phenylacetamide Huang et al. [357] 308–328 10.4–22.5 300 AnPTSemY
n-Undecane Camacho-Camacho 314–418 2–20 100 AnTCapValVis
et al. [209]
N-Vinyl caprolactam Kwon et al. [473] 323–353 3.8–20.6 25 SynVisVar
18 J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69
Table 4 (Continued)
Table 4 (Continued)
Table 4 (Continued)
Table 4 (Continued)
Tetraheptylammonium bromide [thepam] [Br] Scurto et al. [648] 321–321 15–15 n.a. SynVis
Tetrahexylammonium bromide [thexam] [Br] Scurto et al. [648] 373–307 0.1–23.1 n.a. SynVisVar
Tetrahydrofuran Knez et al. [430] 313–353 0.4–10.2 500 AnTVLcirVis
Lazzaroni et al. [479] 298–333 0.6–9.5 150 SynTVis
Li [495] 313–333 6–10 25 SynVisVar
Tetrakis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)zirconium(IV) Aschenbrenner et al. 333–333 10–17.5 10 AnPTSemY
[177]
Tetra-n-butylphosphonium formate [TBP] [FOR] Yokozeki et al. [780] 298–298 0–1.9 n.a. AnGrav
Tetraoctylammonium bromide [toam] [Br] Scurto et al. [648] 332–370 1–35 n.a. SynVis
Tetrapentylammonium bromide [tpam] [Br] Scurto et al. [648] 354–354 15–15 n.a. SynVis
Thiophene Elizalde-Solis and 314–383 2–14.4 100 AnTCapValVisPc
Galicia-Luna [277]
Serrano-Cocoletzi 314–363 2–12.9 100 AnTValVis
[656]
Thymidine Suleiman et al. [68] 318–328 10–30 n.a. AnPTChro
Suleiman et al. [68] 318–328 20–20 n.a. AnPTSemY
Toluene Kwon et al. [472] 323–323 1.8–8.7 150 AnTVLcirVal
Lay et al. [478] 293–308 1.7–7.3 130 AnTVisVar
Lazzaroni et al. [479] 323–323 1.2–8.6 150 SynTVis
Lee et al. [484] 352–352 0.1–2.9 n.a. SynT
Lee [485] 352–352 0.2–3 n.a. SynT
Naidoo et al. [25] 283–391 0.4–12.1 200 AnTValVisVar
Wu et al. [133] 333–572 6.7–16.5 n.a. SynNonCon
Trans-Co2 (CO)6 [3,5-bis(CF3 )C6 H3 P(i-C3 H7 )2 ] Dahmen et al. [241] 313–343 10–26 10 AnPTSemY
Tri(2-furyl)phosphine Ablan et al. [164] 296–296 12.4–23.3 n.a. SynVisVar
Tri-(2-hydroxy ethyl)-ammonium acetate (THEAA) Yuan et al. [783] 303–323 1–10.1 n.a. SynT
Tri-(2-hydroxy ethyl)-ammonium lactate (THEAL) Yuan et al. [783] 303–323 0.9–8.4 n.a. SynT
Tridodecylamine Kaboudvand 308–328 8–40 n.a. AnPTSemY
Ghaziaskar [401]
Kaboudvand 308–328 8–40 n.a. AnPTSemY
Ghaziaskar [402]
Trifluoroethyl acrylate Wang et al. [753] 323–333 8–10 n.a. SynVisVar
Trifluoromethane (HFC-23) Nasrifar [571] 263–302 1.9–7 3.5 SynVisVar
Triglycidyl p-aminophenol Medina-Gonzalez 318–318 14.5–14.5 10 AnT
et al. [544]
Trihexyl (tetradecyl) phosphonium dodecylbenzenesulfonates Zhang [799] 307–322 4.6–8.9 n.a. SynTVis
[P6,6,6,14] [c12h25phso3]
Trihexyl (tetradecyl) phosphonium mesylate [P6,6,6,14] [meso3] Zhang [799] 307–322 4.4–8.7 n.a. SynTVis
Trihexyltetradecylphoshonium chloride Hutchings [362] 292–343 5.8–11 n.a. SynVisVar
Tri-isobutyl-methyl phosphonium p-toluenesulfonate ([ibu3mep] Anthony et al. [74] 323–323 0–1.3 n.a. AnGrav
[TOS])
Trimethylchlorosilane Vyhmeister et al. 308–343 7.1–10 n.a. SynVisVarPc
[751]
Tri-n-butyl phosphate Koh et al. [435] 313–313 8.7–9 22.4 SynVisVar
Trioctylamine Ghaziaskar [315] 308–338 8–40 12.8 AnPTSemY
Trioxane Tanaka and Ogino 323–393 7.9–11.6 50 AnTY
[710]
Tripalmitin Li et al. [494] 322–337 0.1–19.6 25 SynVisVar
Münüklü et al. [565] 336–363 3.2–24.7 3.5 SynVisVar
Triphenylphosphine Shimoyama et al. 320–333 9–16 26.5 AnSpecVcir
[670]
Tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)chromium(III) Aschenbrenner et al. 333–333 10–30 10 AnPTSemY
[177]
Tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)cobalt(III) Aschenbrenner et al. 333–333 10–30 10 AnPTSemY
[177]
Tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)iron(III) Aschenbrenner et al. 333–333 10–30 10 AnPTSemY
[177]
Tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)manganese(III) Aschenbrenner et al. 333–333 10–30 10 AnPTSemY
[177]
Tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)ruthenium(III) Aschenbrenner et al. 333–333 10–30 10 AnPTSemY
[177]
Tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)titanium(iii) Aschenbrenner et al. 333–333 10–30 10 AnPTSemY
[177]
Tris(p-trifluoromethylphenyl)-phosphine Shimoyama et al. 320–333 9–14 26.5 AnSpecVcir
[670]
Tristearin Spilimbergo [123] 308–325 1–5.8 n.a. SynNon
Tri-tert-butylphenol Hong [106] 301–343 6.8–66.8 n.a. SynVisVar
Ucuuba fat Soares et al. [687] 313–353 20–35 100 AnTY
Uracil Zhou [812] 308–338 15–40 10 AnPTSemY
Uranium dioxide(acetylacetonate)2dimethylsulfoxide Tsukahara [724] 313–313 10–25 216 AnSpec
Uranium dioxide(hexafluoroacetylacetonate)2dimethylsulfoxide Tsukahara [724] 313–313 10–25 216 AnSpec
Uranium dioxide(trifluoroacetylacetonate)2dimethylsulfoxide Tsukahara [724] 313–313 10–25 216 AnSpec
Urea Catchpole [211] 313–353 0.1–30 500 AnPTSemY
Vanillin Hybertson [57] 318–318 10–20 7.5 AnPTSemYVal
Liu [513] 305–408 6.1–135.7 30 SynVis
Skerget et al. [684] 313–353 8–27.6 120 AnT
Skerget et al. [684] 338–354 0.1–48.3 74 SynVis
22 J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69
Table 4 (Continued)
librium properties, like the pressure and the composition of the were as follows: empty bags 4.1 g, CO2 collected 2.5–6.5 g, solids
phases, reach equilibrium values, depending on other variables, 0.006–0.6 g. The solids were washed out of the collection bag with
like mole numbers and volume. At the beginning of an experi- a solvent and transferred to NMR tubes.
ment, an equilibrium cell is charged with the substances of interest. Another possibility to reduce sampling problems is the recir-
The pressure is adjusted above or below the desired equilibrium culation of one or more phases, having the advantage that the
value, depending on whether the pressure will rise or fall during sampling volume (e.g., the loop of a six-port valve) is filled iso-
equilibration. After the desired temperature has been reached, the barically. Disadvantages of a recirculation are the need for a
mixture is kept under isothermal conditions. By stirring the mixture well-working pump with only little pressure drop and the need for a
or by rocking the autoclave or by recirculating one or more phases, uniform temperature field to avoid partial condensation or vapor-
time for equilibration of the phases is reduced. After some time, ization in the recirculation line. Therefore, recirculation methods
the pressure reaches a plateau. The pressure can be readjusted, are not suitable in the region close to the critical point where small
by adding or withdrawing material or by changing the volume of changes in temperature and pressure have a strong influence on
the equilibrium cell. Usually, the equilibration is continued for at the phase behavior.
least 30 min after the pressure plateau is sufficiently close to the When only the vapor phase is recirculated (Vcir), it is withdrawn
desired value. Before taking samples from the coexisting phases, continually and passed back into the equilibrium cell through the
the mixture is given sufficient time without stirring, rocking or liquid phase by the action of a pump, e.g. Kato and Nishiumi [40].
recirculation for the separation of the phases. Otherwise the sam- Samples can be withdrawn by placing a sampling valve in the recir-
ple might not be homogeneous but contain material from another culation loop [27] or by blocking off a volume between two valves
phase, e.g. droplets, bubbles or solid particles. in the recirculation loop. The liquid phase is usually analyzed by
Isothermal methods that use stirring or rocking to ensure a rapid taking samples through capillaries.
approach to equilibrium are often called static analytical methods. Seredynska et al. [30] developed an apparatus that consists of
As opposed to recirculating methods, the mixture does not leave the two equilibrium cells that are run parallel at identical tempera-
equilibrium cell during the experiment. But, since the expressions tures and similar pressures. One autoclave was used for sampling
“static cell” and “static method” are used by some authors for other the liquid phase and the other for sampling the vapor phase, each
experimental methods (e.g., for a synthetic method in a view cell via a capillary that is connected to a pneumatic sampling valve. For
or for a synthetic method using the material balance to determine binary systems, it does not matter that slightly different equilib-
solubilities of gases in liquids), we avoid the expression “static” in rium pressures are reached in the autoclaves.
our classification. Recirculation of both the vapor and the liquid phase (VLcir) has
Sampling through capillaries can lead to differential vaporiza- the advantage that sampling from both phases is possible without
tion and scattering results, especially for mixtures containing light using capillaries [41,42]. If a vibrating-tube densimeter is installed
and heavy components when no precautions have been taken to in a recirculation loop, the density of the circulated phase can be
prevent a pressure drop all along the capillary [37]. Differential determined [43]. The pump should be turned off during density
vaporization can be avoided with an experimental design that measurement to avoid errors due to pulsation [42].
ensures that most of the pressure drop occurs at the end of the capil- Ruffine et al. [27] developed an apparatus with vapor-phase cir-
lary close to the chromatographic circuit, e.g. Richon and coworkers culation and a special liquid-phase sampling technique to measure
[38] used a micro-stem ending with a nose entering inside the VLE and VLLE. The liquid phase is transferred from the equilibrium
capillary to reduce the cross-sectional area at the end of the cell to a buffer cell at isobaric conditions by means of two volumet-
capillary. ric pumps. Then the sample is completely vaporized by flash within
Margon et al. [39] investigated VLE of binary, ternary and qua- a vaporization loop and the thermostatic air bath temperature of
ternary systems of phenol, diphenyl carbonate, Bisphenol A and the sampling system is increased up to 373 K. The vaporized sample
CO2 . To determine the solubility of these high-boiling substances is injected into a gas chromatograph. The same procedure is used
in CO2 , an unusual sampling technique was used: a sample of the for each liquid phase.
vapor-phase was trapped into a polyethylene sample bag by quickly Sometimes only the liquid phase is circulated (Lcir), e.g. for
opening and closing the outlet valve to let a part of the vapor-phase mixing, for blocking off a large liquid phase volume from the equi-
out of the autoclave. The amounts of solids and CO2 in the sam- librium cell before pressure reduction [44], for the measurement
ple bags were determined by weighing, while correcting for the of liquid–liquid equilibria or for the measurement of solubilities of
buoyancy effect due to the air displaced by CO2 . Typical weights gases in liquids [45].
J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69 23
Table 5
Binary systems: water + X.
Table 5 (Continued)
Sherman et al. [46] developed a method in which the sampled less steel cylindrical container that was fixed to the head of the
volume stays within the equilibrium cell until depressurization is equilibrium cell. This upper cylindrical container was equipped
finished. We call this method “in situ sampling” (AnTIns). It can with a small magnetic stir bar and communicates with the external
be used for the measurement of the solubility of solids in super- chamber through two slits opened in its uppermost part.
critical fluids. An excess amount of solute is put into a glass vial, In the material-loss-analysis method (AnTMla) the sample is
capped with coarse filter paper, into the equilibrium cell. With two taken out of the equilibrium cell an analyzed after depressuriza-
magnetic stir bars in the equilibrium cell of which one is placed tion. It is used to determine the solubility and diffusivity of volatile
into the vial a faster equilibration can be achieved. After the phase components (often CO2 ) in polymers. After equilibration a fast
equilibrium has been attained, the high-pressure cell is carefully depressurization procedure and a quick transport of the sample
depressurized, and the vial is removed and weighed. The solubility (loaded polymer) to an analytical balance are performed. The mass
can be calculated from the difference of the initial and final mass of decrease of the polymer sample due to desorption of the volatile
the solute in the vial and the difference of the volume of the equilib- component is recorded and analyzed. The initial value of sorbate
rium cell and the vial. Liu et al. [47] used in situ sampling to measure mass can be determined by extrapolation of the desorption curve
the solubility of surfactants in CO2 and in 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane to the beginning of depressurization. Duarte et al. [49] used a quick
(HFC-134a). Instead of a glass vial Filardo et al. [48] used a stain- opening cell. They established a compromise between the veloc-
J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69 25
Table 6
Binary systems: ammonia + X.
Table 7
Binary systems: hydrogen sulfide + X.
ity of depressurization and opening of the cell, so that CO2 would that the volume of the cell plays an important role, but they do
not freeze inside. The volume of the cell plays an important role in not give information on the volume of their new cell. They only
preventing the CO2 to freeze; this becomes more evident for the say that it should be as small as possible to prevent freezing of the
experiments with lower time of exposure. The authors point out CO2 .
Table 8
Binary systems: hydrogen + X.
Table 9
Binary systems: nitrogen + X.
Table 10
Binary systems: oxygen + X.
Table 11
Binary systems: carbon monoxide + X.
Table 12
Binary systems: nitrous oxide + X.
Faridi and Todd [50] used a very “basic” form of material loss be easily extended. If carried out carefully they can produce very
analysis to measure the solubility of blowing agents in polyethylene reliable results.
terephthalate: they perform a fast depressurization and sampling, 19.7% of all systems investigated of this review have been mea-
weigh the polymer sample just once and assume that this is the sured with an analytical isothermal method.
equilibrium value. No corrections for weight loss during depres-
surization and sampling were taken into account. 3.1.2. Analytical isobaric–isothermal methods (AnPT)
As compared to analytical isobaric–isothermal methods isother- In isobaric–isothermal methods, often called dynamic methods,
mal methods have the advantage that time for equilibration can one or more fluid streams are pumped continuously into a ther-
Table 13
Binary systems: methane + X.
Table 14
Binary systems: ethane + X.
1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ethyl sulfate [emim] Petermann et al. [79] 298–298 0.1–6 n.a. AnGrav
EtSO4 ]
1-n-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Anthony et al. [74] 283–323 0–1.3 n.a. AnGrav
bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([bmim] Tf2N])
1-n-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium Florusse et al. [298] 298–360 0.3–13 3.5 SynVisVar
bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide [hmim] Tf2N]
1-Propanol Jiménez-Gallegos et al. [390] 313–348 0.8–9.4 40 AnTCapValVisPc
Carbon dioxide Gil et al. [115] 291–304 5–7.1 4 SynVisConPcTc
Diamantane Poot and de Loos [604] 290–512 0.8–197.9 n.a. SynVis
Diethylene glycol (DEG) Jou et al. [395] 298–398 0–20.4 n.a. AnTVcir
Ethylene glycol Jou et al. [398] 298–398 0–20.3 n.a. AnTVcir
Hexafluoroethane (PFC-116) Zhang et al. [804] 199–242 0.1–1.2 300 AnTVcirCap
Zhang et al. [805] 189–252 0–1.6 300 AnTVcir
Methane Janisch et al. [382] 139–270 0.4–6.6 n.a. AnTLcirBlo
Methanol Ruffine et al. [27] 193–309 0.1–5.1 100 AnTVcirBloValVis
n-Decane Schwarz et al. [17] 310–360 4.6–9.3 40 SynVisVar
n-Eicosane Schwarz et al. [17] 310–360 5.7–12.7 40 SynVisVar
n-Hexadecane Schwarz et al. [17] 310–360 5.2–9.5 40 SynVisVar
n-Hexatriacontane Schwarz et al. [17] 350–366 13.4–22.4 40 SynVisVar
Nitrogen Janisch et al. [382] 149–269 1.5–8 n.a. AnTLcirBlo
Nitrous oxide Corvaro et al. [234] 215–282 0.4–3.8 273.5 SynT
n-Octacosane Schwarz et al. [17] 330–360 9.1–13 40 SynVisVar
n-Tetracontane Gregorowicz [324] 360–423 0.1–160 n.a. SynVisVar
Poly(ethylene) 23,625 Gregorowicz [324] 360–423 0.1–160 n.a. SynVisVar
Poly(ethylene) 52,000 Gregorowicz [324] 360–423 0.1–160 n.a. SynVisVar
Poly(ethylene) 59,300 Gregorowicz [324] 360–423 0.1–160 n.a. SynVisVar
Poly(ethylene) 7000 Gregorowicz [324] 360–423 0.1–160 n.a. SynVisVar
Poly(ethylene) 800 Gregorowicz [324] 360–423 0.1–160 n.a. SynVisVar
Poly(ethylene-co-20,2 mol%-1-butene) (PEB10) Kostko et al. [445] 368–424 111.6–128.4 15 SynVisVar
Tetrafluoromethane (CFC-14) Zhu et al. [815] 179–210 0–2.1 300 AnTVcir
Trifluoromethane (HFC-23) Zhang et al. [806] 188–243 0–1.6 300 AnTVcir
Water Kim et al. [426] 277–280 10.1–15.1 n.a. SynVisVar
Mohammadi et al. [556] 275–282 0.6–1.4 58 SynNon
Mokraoui et al. [558] 288–303 3.4–3.4 34 AnTCapVal
Yarrison et al. [774] 314–466 3.4–110.3 1300 AnPTSemY
Yasuda and Ohmura [775] 244–275 0.1–0.6 200 SynNon
mostated equilibrium cell. The pressure is kept constant during the 3.1.2.2. Semi-flow methods (AnPTSem). In semi-flow methods, only
experiment by controlling an effluent stream, usually of the vapor one phase is flowing while the other phase stays in an equilib-
phase. rium cell. Semi-flow methods are sometimes called “single-pass
flow methods”, “gas-saturation methods” or “pure-gas circulation
methods”. A fluid stream from a high-pressure reservoir is passed
3.1.2.1. Continuous-flow methods (AnPTCon). In a typical design of a
through two cells in series containing the solute, either a liquid or
continuous-flow method, high-pressure metering pumps feed the
a solid. The first cell serves as a presaturator and the second cell
preheated components into a mixer, where the desired tempera-
as equilibrium cell. Often, a syringe pump is used since it operates
ture and phase equilibrium is attained. Often, static mixers are used
at constant pressure and enables a pulse-free constant fluid flow
[51]. The feed stream from the mixer is separated in an equilibrium
[54]. Usually, the effluent is a supercritical fluid and the method is
cell into a vapor and a liquid phase. Effluents from both phases are
used to determine the solubility of a liquid or solid in the super-
withdrawn continually, depressurized, accumulated and analyzed,
critical fluid. Roth and coworkers [55] used a semi-flow method to
usually after the experiment. The pressure in the equilibrium cell
determine the solubility of solids in hot pressurized water. Upon
is adjusted by controlling the effluent stream of the top phase. The
equilibration, the effluent is reduced in pressure and directed to a
interface level between the fluid phases in the equilibrium cell can
trap where the condensed solute is collected. The quantity of the
be adjusted with the bottom-phase expansion valve, whereby the
gas coming out of the trap can be determined volumetrically, e.g.
interface level is usually determined visually, e.g. Shimoyama et al.
with a wet test meter.
[52].
Most often, only the composition of the effluent phase (vapor
Continuous-flow methods have the advantage that sampling
or liquid) is analyzed (AnPTSemY), for example to determine the
does not disturb the equilibrium. If larger samples are needed for
solubility of a low-boiling (liquid or solid) substance in a supercrit-
analyses, the run time of the experiment can be extended to accu-
ical fluid [56]. The composition of the vapor-phase effluent can be
mulate more material. Measurements at higher temperatures are
determined in many different ways, e.g. by using a spectroscopic
possible without thermal decomposition or polymerization reac-
method [54], by using a multi-port sampling valve and subsequent
tions due to the short residence time of the components in the
HPLC analysis [57] or after expansion to atmospheric pressure using
apparatus. Therefore, continous-flow methods should be preferred
a cold trap [58], an absorption bath [59], or a short column filled
when working with temperature-sensitive compounds. Using a
with an appropriate adsorbent that captures the solute from the
continuous-flow method, Fang et al. [53] measured phase equilibria
effluent stream [60].
for methanol + methyl-esterified deodorizer destillate of soybean
Kautz et al. [54] used a modified supercritical fluid chromato-
oil at temperatures up to 598 K.
graph to measure the solubility of dyes in CO2 . The column was
Continuous-flow methods can be used only for systems where
filled with finely pulverized dyestuff. Analysis of the vapor-phase
the time needed to attain phase equilibrium is sufficiently
stream is done by VIS-spectroscopy (AnPTSemYSpec).
short.
J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69 29
Table 15
Binary systems: propane + X.
When a semi-flow method is used for the measurement of analyzed, e.g. Weng et al. [61]. Semi-flow methods can also be
vapor–liquid equilibria AnPTSemXY, the composition of the liq- used to measure the solubility of a gas in a liquid, e.g. Yin and
uid phase needs to be determined. Therefore, a sample from the Tan [62]. The experimental procedure (AnPTSemX) is similar to
liquid phase is withdrawn through tubing, depressurized, and the one for measuring vapor–liquid equilibria, but there is no
30 J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69
Table 16
Binary systems: n-butane + X.
need to determine the composition of the effluent from the vapor a supercritical fluid. Glass wool before and after the packed
phase. bed guarantees a uniform flow distribution and prevents parti-
The major uncertainty of all flow methods is the possible cle entrainment. A line by-passing the extractor allows solubility
lack of attainment of equilibrium. Another difficulty is the par- measurements at high concentrations. It dilutes the saturated fluid
tial condensation of the solute from the saturated vapor stream stream with clean CO2 and reduces the risk of valve clogging and
in the tubing, particularly in and after the expansion valve. flow rate instability.
This undesired variable hold-up of the solute leads to scattering Folas et al. [65] used a semiflow method to determine the sol-
results. After having blocked off the equilibrium cell at the end ubility of water in nitrogen, methane and a synthetic natural gas.
of an experiment, a stream of CO2 can be used to collect pre- Instead of a presaturator they used a “supersaturator” consisting
cipitated solute from the tubing and from the expansion valve. of two cylinders in series that dissolves water in the gas stream
To avoid unwanted precipitation after the restrictor, Özcan and at a higher temperature than the desired equilibrium tempera-
Özcan [63] added a flow of 0.1 ml methanol/min between the ture. Then the saturated gas stream flows through a condenser
restrictor and the back pressure regulator to the CO2 stream of that is thermostated at the desired equilibrium temperature. A
1 ml/min. part of the dissolved water is precipitated in the condenser which
Banchero et al. [64] used an experimental technique that consists of three cylinders in series. A high pressure dew point mir-
allowed the measurement of high concentrations of dyestuff in ror is used to determine when stable conditions are reached in
Table 17
Binary systems: n-hexane + X.
Table 18
Binary systems: ethene + X.
Table 19
Binary systems: propene + X.
the experimental equipment. During measurements the gas flow In SFC, the thermodynamic analysis of solute retention is more
bypasses the mirror. Both saturation and condensation are done difficult than in GC because the uptake of the mobile phase fluid
at the same pressure. A Karl Fischer (KF) coulometric titrator from by the stationary phase is no longer negligible. Chromatographic
Metrohm is used to measure the water content in the gas from the methods have as advantage the possibility to determine equi-
condenser. librium properties and diffusion coefficients in one experiment
[67].
3.1.2.3. Chromatographic methods (AnPTChro). Chromatographic Suleiman et al. [68] combined a supercritical fluid chro-
methods measure solute retention in a chromatographic column matographic technique (AnPTChro) in combination with the
and connect it with the Gibbs energy of solute transfer between semi-flow method (AnPTSemY) to determine the solubility of
the stationary and the mobile phase. Roth [66] gives a review anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and anti-HIV drugs in supercrit-
on applications of supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) for ical CO2 . The chromatographic method provided the retention
the determination of the relative values of solute solubilities in times of the solutes of interest and those of an un-retained
supercritical fluids, and on the determination of solute partition substance, which were used to obtain equilibrium partition coeffi-
coefficients between a supercritical fluid and the stationary phase. cients. The partition coefficients were subsequently used to obtain
Table 20
Binary systems: 1-butene + X.
Table 21
Binary systems: methanol + X.
solubilities at various temperatures and pressures. A few experi- 3.1.4. Analytical spectroscopic methods (AnSpec)
mental solubility data obtained with the semi-flow method were Using spectroscopic methods, the composition of the phases is
used to provide a calibration parameter for the chromatographic analyzed at high pressures without having to take samples. Often,
method. infrared techniques are used. Koglbauer and Wendland [34] devel-
Machida et al. [69] used an inverse supercritical-fluid chromato- oped an apparatus where a high-pressure view cell was placed in
graphic method to measure infinite dilution partition coefficients the sample compartment of an Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
of aromatic compounds between an ionic liquid and CO2 . spectrometer to measure the solubility of water in compressed
synthetic air. The IR light absorbance could be measured in situ
in the gas phase, which was inside the view cell in equilibrium
3.1.3. Analytical isobaric methods (AnP) with the relatively thin liquid phase. The IR light absorbance in
The boiling temperature of a mixture is measured at isobaric compressed air is related to that in saturated pure water vapor. An
conditions and phase compositions are determined after sampling additional calibration in a homogeneous compressed air sample
and analysis. Typically, isobaric experiments are performed in an with known humidity content is needed to correct for the effect of
ebulliometer (from latin ebullio “to boil, to bubble up”), which is the gas density on the FTIR spectra.
a one-stage total-reflux boiler equipped with a vapor-lift pump to Haines et al. [70] applied near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy to
spray slugs of equilibrated liquid and vapor onto a thermometer determine the solubility of surfactants in CO2 . Pasquali et al. [71]
well. As opposed to the more frequently used synthetic-isobaric used attenuated total reflection infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy to
method (SynP), vapor and liquid streams are separated, collected simultaneously measure the sorption of CO2 in polyethylene glycol
and can be sampled and analyzed. The compositions of the liq- (PEG) and the polymer swelling.
uid and the vapor phase change with time and reach a steady Rondinone et al. [72] developed a single-crystal sapphire cell
state which should not differ significantly from the true equi- that allows unobstructed spectroscopic access to the cell for per-
librium value. Usually, analytical isobaric methods are used to forming neutron-scattering experiments on gas hydrates. Since
measure low-pressure data. Then, it is often called the “dynamic” sapphire contains only aluminum and oxygen, it possesses a low
VLE method. incoherent neutron scattering and absorption cross-section and
Table 22
Binary systems: ethanol + X.
Table 23
Binary systems: dimethyl ether + X.
Table 24
Binary systems: chlorodifluoromethane (HCFC-22) + X.
Dimethylether of tetraethyleneglycol (DMETEG) Jelinek et al. [384] 298–393 0–1.9 n.a. SynNon
N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) He et al. [344] 283–363 0–1.9 80 SynTVcirVis
Poly(-caprolactone) Byun et al. [202] 312–444 4.3–45.4 28 SynVisVar
Park et al. [591] 322–412 1.5–29.3 n.a. SynVisVar
Park et al. [592] 322–412 1.5–29.3 n.a. SynVisVar
Poly(l-lactide) Park et al. [591] 332–410 3.6–26.1 n.a. SynVisVar
Park et al. [592] 332–410 3.6–26.1 n.a. SynVisVar
Tristearin Spilimbergo et al. [123] 309–324 0.1–0.7 n.a. SynNon
Table 25
Binary systems: trifluoromethane (HFC-23) + X.
Table 26
Binary systems: difluoromethane (HFC-32) + X.
Table 27
Binary systems: 1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoroethane (HFC-125) + X.
1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a) Kato and Nishiumi [40] 303–363 0.9–3.9 1200 AnTLcirVisVar
Kato and Nishiumi [40] 346–360 3.7–3.9 1200 SynVisVarPcTc
1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium Shiflett et al. [666] 283–348 0–0.9 n.a. AnGrav
bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide [emim] [Tf2N]
1-n-Butyl-3-methylimidazoium Shiflett and Yokozeki [662] 283–348 0–0.9 n.a. AnGrav
hexyfluorophosphate [bmim] [PF6 ]
1-n-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Shiflett and Yokozeki [157] 271–313 0.6–2 1.2 SynOthVis
hexafluorophosphate ([bmim] [PF6 ])
2-Methylpropane (isobutane) Chen et al. [219] 243–333 0–3.1 31.7 SynT
Cyclopropane Fedele et al. [296] 253–293 0.1–1.2 50 AnTVcirVis
Dimethyl ether Im et al. [370] 313–363 0.8–3.9 320 AnTVLcirVis
Fluoroethane (HFC-161) Han et al. [334] 265–313 0.3–2 80 AnTLcirVis
n-Butane Fedele et al. [294] 278–298 0.1–1.3 50 AnTVcirVis
Im et al. [367] 313–333 0.3–3.1 320 AnTVLcirValVis
Nitrous oxide Di Nicola et al. [259] 217–293 0.1–1.3 273.5 SynT
J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69 35
Table 28
Binary systems: 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a) + X.
1,1,1,2,2-Pentafluoroethane (HFC-125) Kato and Nishiumi [40] 303–363 0.9–3.9 1200 AnTLcirVisVar
Kato and Nishiumi [40] 346–360 3.7–3.9 1200 SynVisVarPcTc
1-n-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Shiflett and Yokozeki [664] 318–355 0.7–2.7 1.2 SynOthVis
hexafluorophosphate [bmim] [PF6 ]
6-Methoxy-1-tetralone Abbott et al. [89] 378–378 7–19 25 AnOth
Carbon dioxide Lim et al. [508] 323–343 1.6–7.1 50 AnTVLcirValVis
Crotonic acid Abbott et al. [89] 378–378 5–15 25 AnOth
Cyclopropane Fedele et al. [296] 253–293 0.1–0.6 50 AnTVcirVis
Difluoromethane (HFC-32) Cui et al. [239] 258–343 0.1–4.8 80 AnTVcirVis
Kato and Nishiumi [40] 323–350 1.1–4.8 1200 AnTLcirVisVar
Kato and Nishiumi [40] 354–368 4.5–5.6 1200 SynVisVarPcTc
Dimethyl ether Im et al. [369] 313–343 8.6–21 320 AnTVLcirValVis
Valtz et al. [731] 293–358 0.4–2.8 n.a. AnTCapValVis
Ethylene-glycol dimethylether Chaudhari et al. [218] 283–353 0–2.6 48.26 SynT
Ethylvanillin Knez et al. [102] 313–333 6–29 120 AnT
Knez et al. [102] 337–343 0.9–31 74 SynVis
Fluoroethane (HFC-161) Dong et al. [268] 253–292 0.1–0.8 300 AnTVcir
Hexafluoroethane (PFC-116) Madani et al. [530] 263–353 0.1–4.1 n.a. AnTCapValVis
Itaconic acid Abbott et al. [89] 378–393 5–20.5 25 AnOth
Methylsuccinic acid Abbott et al. [89] 378–383 5–20 25 AnOth
n- Im et al. [367] 313–333 0.3–1.7 320 AnTVLcirValVis
Butane Lim et al. [505] 273–323 0.1–1.3 85 AnTVLcirValVis
o-Ethylvanillin Knez et al. [102] 313–333 4.7–26 120 AnT
o-Vanillin Knez et al. [102] 299–301 0.8–3.2 74 SynVis
Knez et al. [102] 313–333 5.2–24.6 120 AnT
Poly(ethylene) (LDPE) Wang et al. [757] 383–473 0.3–2.2 42 SynT
Polystyrene (PS) Li et al. [73] 403–463 1.3–5.5 n.a. AnGrav
Propane Lim et al. [503] 273–323 0.2–2.1 85 AnTVLcirValVis
Sodium dibutyl sulfosuccinate Liu et al. [47] 308–338 10–30 48 AnTIns
Sodium dihexyl sulfosuccinate Liu et al. [47] 308–338 10–30 48 AnTIns
Sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate Liu et al. [47] 318–318 30–30 48 AnTIns
Sodium dipentyl sulfosuccinate Liu et al. [47] 318–318 30–30 48 AnTIns
Sodium salt of dibutyl-2-sulfosuccinate Liu et al. [521] 318–318 25–25 48 AnTIns
Sodium salt of dihexyl-2-sulfosuccinate Liu et al. [521] 318–318 25–25 48 AnTIns
Sodium salt of dioctyl-2-sulfosuccinate Liu et al. [521] 318–318 25–25 48 AnTIns
Sodium salt of dipentyl-2-sulfosuccinate Liu et al. [521] 308–338 15–35 48 AnTIns
Squalane Hong et al. [352] 324–400 0–0.6 329.2 SynTVcir
Triethylene glycol dimethyl ether Marchi et al. [539] 282–322 0.2–1.3 n.a. SynNon
Trifluoromethane (HFC-23) Cui et al. [238] 258–293 0.2–3.4 80 AnTLcirVis
Tristearin Spilimbergo et al. [123] 313–326 0.1–0.4 n.a. SynNon
Vanillin Knez et al. [102] 313–333 1.9–20.5 120 AnT
Knez et al. [102] 346–352 0.6–30.4 74 SynVis
␣-Acetamidocinnamic acid Abbott et al. [89] 378–378 4–20 25 AnOth
thus has a low contribution to the background. The cell is a hollow 3.1.5. Analytical gravimetric methods (AnGrav)
cylinder with flanges on each end as support surfaces for sealing With gravimetric methods the mass of a condensed phase (e.g.,
endcaps. No bolts run along the outside of the cell. No other exter- a polymer [73], an ionic liquid [74], or an polymerized ionic liquid
nal supports are needed. The cell has an internal volume of 7.8 cm3 [75]) in phase equilibrium with a fluid phase is measured. Using
and can be operated at pressures up to 35 MPa and temperatures addtional information, like the phase densities, the phase compo-
between 10 and 300 K. sitions can be determined.
In the analytical spectroscopic methods, the advantage of avoid- While quartz spring balances are less and less used, commer-
ing the trouble with taking samples is often overcompensated by cially available electrobalances become more widespread. Almost
the need of time consuming calibrations at high pressures. Only 25 years ago Kleinrahm and Wagner [76] from Ruhr-Universität
1.5% of all systems covered in this review have been investigated Bochum proposed a unique balance, the so-called magnetic suspen-
with a spectroscopic method. sion balance, which they further developed and commercialized.
Table 29
Binary systems: 1,1,1-trifluoroethane (HFC-143a) + X.
Table 30
Binary systems: 1,1-difluoroethane (HFC-152a) + X.
Originally, it was intended for accurate measurements of fluid den- They used the analytical gravimetric method (AnGrav) only at
sities, but other applications were found, particularly to measure pressures up to 1.3 MPa. At higher pressures they measured the
the solubility and diffusivity of volatile components in polymers, same systems using the synthetic-isothermal method (SynT). Pan-
e.g. Aionicesei et al. [77] or Li et al. [78]. It has the main advan- toula et al. combined magnetic-suspension-balance experiments
tage that the equilibrium cell and the balance are separate units. (AnGrav) with the material-loss-analysis method (AnTMla). This
An electronically controlled magnetic suspension coupling is used combination allows the determination of sorption and swelling at
to transmit the measured force from the sample enclosed in a pres- high pressures and temperatures where optical methods are diffi-
sure vessel to a microbalance. The suspension magnet, which is cult to use.
used for transmitting the force, consists of a permanent magnet,
a sensor core and a device for decoupling the measuring-load. An 3.1.6. Other analytical methods (AnOth)
electromagnet, which is attached at the underfloor weighing hook Quartz crystal microbalances can be used to determine the solu-
of a balance, maintains the freely suspended state of the suspen- bility of a gas in a polymer by measuring the mass of the polymer in
sion magnet via an electronic control unit. Using this magnetic equilibrium with the gas. From the basic principle, it is not a gravi-
suspension coupling, the measuring force is transmitted contact- metric measurement, so that buoyancy effects play a different role.
lessly from the measuring chamber to the microbalance, which is Quartz crystal microbalances are based on the piezoelectric effect
located outside the chamber under ambient atmospheric condi- observed in a AT-cut quartz crystal. The crystal under the influence
tions. Petermann et al. [79] used a magnetic suspension balance of an applied alternating electric voltage undergoes a shear defor-
with which additional to the sample a sinker (titanium or silicon) mation which becomes maximum at a certain frequency called the
can be weighed. This allows a highly accurate determination of the resonance frequency [86]. This resonance frequency depends on
sorptiv gas density surrounding the sample. the mass, and thus any mass change will result in a respective fre-
Von Solms et al. [80] used a purpose-built high-pressure quency shift. The sorption experiment involves measurement of the
microbalance to determine solubility and diffusivity of gases in resonance frequency of the bare (clean) crystal, of the same crystal
polymers intended for use in offshore oil and gas applications. The coated with polymer, and of the coated crystal after the polymer
polymer sample is placed on one arm of a microbalance, with quartz reaches equilibrium with a gas, all at the same controlled temper-
spheres placed on the other as counterweights. Gas is admitted ature. Concurrently, the resonance frequency of a reference crystal
rapidly to the whole balance at the pressure of interest (or evac- is also measured under the same conditions in order to compensate
uated rapidly in the case of an evacuation run), after the whole any temperature or pressure effects.
apparatus, including the sample, has been at the temperature of Saldana et al. [87] further developed the quartz crystal tech-
interest for at least 24 h. The difference in the reading on the balance nique to measure low solubilities of -carotene in supercritical
before and after a run, is the amount of gas adsorbed or desorbed. fluids. -Carotene was dissolved in chloroform, an aliquot was
The diffusion coefficient can also be obtained by studying the time- placed on the quartz crystal electrode area. The solvent was slowly
dependent behavior of the adsorbed/desorbed mass of gas. evaporated under gentle nitrogen flow. The solubility was mea-
Shiflett and Yokozeki [81] used a gravimetric microbalance sured by observing the crystal’s frequency change as this solute
to measure solubility and diffusivity of CO2 in ionic liquids. The dissolves in the supercritical fluid.
microbalance consists of an electrobalance with sample and coun- As compared to conventional methods, such as analytical gravi-
terweight components inside a stainless steel pressure-vessel. It metric (AnGrav) or synthetic-isothermal (SynT, pressure decay), a
has a weighing range of 0–100 mg with a resolution of 0.1 g. Sori- much higher sensitivity for the determination of mass changes can
ano et al. [82] used a gravimetric microbalance with a weighing be achieved with a quartz crystal microbalance. Therefore, smaller
range of up to 100 g with a readability of 1 g. samples are needed and phase equilibrium is attained much faster,
Gravimetric methods need corrections for buoyancy, which since equilibration time is inversely proportional to the square of
can be higher than the uncorrected solubility [83]. Therefore, the film thickness. Pantoula and Panayiotou [86] report an equi-
particularly at high pressures, exact information on the density librium time of 30 min for CO2 in PMMA or polystyrene at a film
of the fluid phase and on the density and volume of the con- thickness of 1–3 m on the crystal. However, the quartz crystal
densed phase is essential [81]. Owing to this problem often the microbalance technique also has some drawbacks: the preparation
analytical gravimetric method is combined with other methods and loading of the sample onto the crystal can be very challenging
as described, e.g. by Muldoon et al. [84] or Pantoula et al. [85]. in addition to the system being highly sensitive to small changes in
Muldoon et al. measured the solubility of CO2 in ionic liquids. electrical current, any air flow or motion in the surroundings and
Table 31
Binary systems: X + Y.
1,1,1,2,3,3,3-Heptafluoropropane (HFC-227ea) Isobutene Yun et al. [786] 288–363 0.2–2.4 200 AnTVLcirVal
1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoropropane (HFC-236fa) Ethylvanillin Knez et al. [102] 313–333 5.7–26.6 120 AnT
Knez et al. [102] 342–347 1.3–29.2 74 SynVis
Ortho-ethylvanillin Knez et al. [102] 313–333 4.2–27 120 AnT
Ortho-vanillin Knez et al. [102] 299–302 1.1–3.6 74 SynVis
Knez et al. [102] 313–333 7.9–26.3 120 AnT
Vanillin Knez et al. [102] 313–333 1.1–20.5 120 AnT
1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoropropane (HFC-236fa) Vanillin Knez et al. [102] 350–355 1.3–28.3 74 SynVis
1,1,1,3,3-Pentafluorobutane (HFC-365mfc) Galden HAT 55 Fröba et al. [305] 304–448 0–2.7 10 SynTVis
1,2,2,2-Tetrafluoroethyl trifluoromethyl ether (HFE-227me) Methylpentafluoroethylether (HFE-245mc) Yasumoto et al. [777] 401–382 2.8–2.6 16 SynVisVarPcTc
Trifluoromethoxymethane (HFE-143m) Yasumoto et al. [777] 377–376 2.8–3.4 16 SynVisVarPcTc
1,5-Hexadiene Allyl chloride Giles and Wilson [316] 333–373 0.1–0.4 n.a. SynT
1-Butanol 1-n-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium Łachwa et al. [476] 268–269 10.1–50.2 0.5 SynVis
bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide [C6-mim] [Tf2N]
1-Chloro-1,1-difluoroethane (HCFC-142b) (HCFC-142b) Polystyrene Choudhary et al. [114] 423–460 1.4–10 n.a. SynVisCon
1H,1H,2H,2H-tridecafluorooctanol 1-n-Decyl-3-methylimidazolium Ferreira et al. [297] 275–277 0.1–4.2 1 SynVis
bis-[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]imide [C10-mim] [Tf2N]
37
38
Table 31 (Continued)
Method
SynVis
SynVis
SynVis
door [87]. Errors rise with temperature and pressure, due to damp-
SynT
SynT
SynT
SynT
SynT
ening and viscous dissipation upon entering the glass transition
and rubbery state [86].
Another analytical method was used by Giraudeau et al. [88]
V (cm3 )
to measure low gas solubilities, e.g. of hydrogen in water. A palla-
29.7
113
113
113
113
n.a.
dium/hydrogen electrical resistance sensor was used to determine
30
30
the hydrogen content in aqueous electrolyte solutions.
A capacitative method (relative-permittivity method) was used
by Abbott et al. [89] to measure the solubility of unsaturated
1.1–11.2
carboxylic acids in supercritical HFC 134a. Experiments were per-
0–1.2
0–1.2
0.1–1.2
0.1–1.2
0.1–0.8
1.1–9
0.1–2
formed in a 25 cm3 high-pressure cell, lined with a layer of Teflon.
P (MPa)
364–364
364–364
364–364
364–364
273–313
293–413
293–413
pared.
In synthetic methods with a phase transition values of tempera-
bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide [hmim] [Tf2N]
1-n-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium
[CH3 SO4 ]
Vinyl chloride
Table 32
Ternary systems: carbon dioxide + water + X.
Table 33
Ternary systems: carbon dioxide + methanol + X.
is easy and quick. Because no sampling is necessary the experimen- extreme conditions concerning temperatures and pressures. Smith
tal equipment can concentrate on few components and the volume and Fang [8] give examples of the use of diamond anvil cells at very
of the equilibrium cell can be small. Therefore, the apparatus can high pressures. The experimental data at the highest pressures of
be rather inexpensive. On the other hand it can be designed for all articles covered in this review were taken by Solozhenko et al.
Table 34
Ternary systems: carbon dioxide + ethanol + X.
Table 35
Ternary systems: carbon dioxide + tetrahydrofuran + X.
Table 36
Ternary systems: carbon dioxide + dimethyl ether + X.
Table 37
Ternary systems: carbon dioxide + acetone + X.
[92] who studied the phase behavior of boron + boron(III) oxide at 3.2.1. Synthetic-visual methods (SynVis)
5 GPa. The appearance of a new phase is usually detected by visual
For multicomponent systems, experiments with synthetic observation of the resulting turbidity or meniscus in a view cell. For
methods yield less information than with analytical methods, isooptic systems where the coexisting phases have approximately
because the tie lines cannot be determined without additional the same refractive index, visual observation is impossible. The
experiments. Therefore, synthetic methods are mainly used for synthetic-visual method can be used not only for the determina-
binary or pseudo-binary systems. In latter systems at least one of tion of simple vapor–liquid equilibria, but also to study complicated
the components is a pseudocomponent which is grouped of com- phase behavior, e.g. multiphase equilibria [93,94], solid–liquid
ponents with similar properties. An example for a pseudo-binary equilibria [95], critical curves of mixtures [96], gas hydrate for-
system is CO2 + seawater. mation [97], cloud-point determination [98] and phase equilibria
Table 38
Ternary systems: carbon dioxide + hydrogen + X.
2-Propanol (isopropanol) Zevnik and Levec [788] 298–313 0.6–5 300 AnTX
Acetone Lopez-Castillo et al. [527] 313–313 2.5–9 n.a. AnTVisVar
Acetonitrile Lopez-Castillo et al. [527] 313–313 2.5–9 n.a. AnTVisVar
Limonene Bogel-Lukasik et al. [193] 323–323 11–13 n.a. AnTVarVis
Methanol Lopez-Castillo et al. [527] 313–313 2.5–9 n.a. AnTVisVar
Xie et al. [770] 313–313 8.7–21.7 20 SynVisVar
Toluene Yin and Tan [62] 305–343 1.2–10.3 177 AnPTSemX
Water Kumar et al. [456] 273–281 1.5–10.7 n.a. AnTVis
Linga et al. [511] 273–273 1–8.5 323 AnTVis
Sugahara et al. [701] 274–281 1.4–9.1 150 AnTVis
Sugahara et al. [701] 274–274 15.2–15.2 0.2 SynVisSpec
Table 39
Ternary systems: carbon dioxide + X + Y.
(R,S)-1-Phenylethanol Vinyl acetate Paiva et al. [588] 323–343 7–12 160 AnTVisVar
(S)-Naproxen 1-n-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate Kuehne et al. [450] 310–370 1–14 3.5 SynVisVar
[bmim][BF4 ]
1-(4-Isobutylphenyl)-ethanol 1-n-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate Kuehne et al. [453] 278–368 0.7–14 3.5 SynVisVar
[bmim][BF4 ]
1,1,1-Trifluoroethane (HFC-143a) 1,1,1,2,2-Pentafluoroethane (HFC-125) Esperança et al. [120] 305–344 3.7–7.3 5 SynNonPcTc
1-Butanol 2-Ethylhexanoic acid Ghaziaskar et al. [314] 323–323 10–18 16 AnPTSemY
1-Butene 2-Methylpropane (isobutane) Li et al. [496] 376–345 6.4–7.4 18 SynVisPcTc
Poly(octyl acrylate) Byun et al. [99] 393–452 4.6–13.2 28 SynVisVar
1-Decanol 2-Ethylhexanoic acid Ghaziaskar et al. [314] 323–323 10–18 16 AnPTSemY
1-Heptanol n-Pentadecane Secuianu et al. [649] 298–316 4.7–8.5 60 AnTVisVar
1-Methyl-3-octylimidazolium dicyanamide 2-Octanol Bogel-Lukasik et al. [194] 308–308 5–11 42.5 AnTValVis
[omim][N(CN)2 ]
4-(Octan-2-yloxy)-4-oxobutanoic acid Bogel-Lukasik et al. [194] 308–308 5–11 42.5 AnTValVis
Dioctan-2-yl succinate Bogel-Lukasik et al. [194] 308–308 5–11 42.5 AnTValVis
1-Methyl-3-octylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate 2-Octanol Bogel-Lukasik et al. [194] 308–308 5–11 42.5 AnTValVis
43
44
Table 39 (Continued)
Acetylsalicylic acid Benzoic acid Ravipaty et al. [612] 308–328 10.1–28 1.6 AnPTSemYVal
Salicylic acid Ravipaty et al. [612] 308–328 10.1–28 1.6 AnPTSemYVal
␣-Methylbenzyl acetate Acetic acid (ethanoic acid) Calvo et al. [208] 282–363 1.2–5.9 n.a. SynVis
␣-Phellandrene Polystyrene Xu et al. [771] 393–393 6.5–18 21 SynVis
Argon 2-Propanol (isopropanol) Lazzaroni et al. [480] 313–313 6.9–15 103 SynTVisVar
-Carotene Freeze dried carrots Saldana et al. [87] 313–323 12–20 n.a. AnPTSemY
Benzene 1-n-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate Machida et al. [69] 313–333 5.4–14.8 n.a. AnPTChro
[bmim][PF6 ]
Benzil (1,2-diphenylethane-1,2-dione) 1-n-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate Sakellarios et al. [626] 308–308 6.5–10.5 n.a. SynTVisSpec
[bmim][PF6 ]
Benzoic acid Poly(ethylene glycol) Kong et al. [439] 313–313 9.5–9.5 3.3 AnPTChro
Kong et al. [439] 313–313 9.5–9.5 3.3 AnPTChro
Bisphenol A Diphenylcarbonate Margon et al. [39] 403–453 30–30 65 AnTY
Margon et al. [39] 403–453 2.3–10.2 3.5 SynVisVar
C.I. Disperse Blue 79 Poly(ethylene) terephthalate Banchero et al. [64] 353–393 18–24 1000 AnT
Ferri et al. [820] 353–393 18–24 1000 AnT
C.I. Disperse Orange 13 Poly(ethylene terephtalate) van der Kraan et al. [28] 368–388 16.5–26.4 40,000 AnT
Ethyl nonanoate Triglycidyl p-aminophenol Medina-Gonzalez et al. [544] 318–318 14.5–14.5 10 AnT
Ethyl oleate Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether Medina-Gonzalez et al. [544] 318–318 14.5–14.5 10 AnT
Triglycidyl p-aminophenol Medina-Gonzalez et al. [544] 318–318 14.5–14.5 10 AnT
Ethyl p-hydroxybenzoate Ethyl p-aminobenzoate Li [498] 308–328 8–21 100 AnPTSemY
Ethyl undecanoate Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether Medina-Gonzalez et al. [544] 318–318 14.5–14.5 10 AnT
Triglycidyl p-aminophenol Medina-Gonzalez et al. [544] 318–318 14.5–14.5 10 AnT
Ethylbenzene Styrene Zhang et al. [792] 303–341 6.3–11.7 50 SynVisVarPcTc
Ethylcyclohexane Polystyrene Xu et al. [771] 393–393 6.5–18 21 SynVis
Ethylene carbonate Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether Medina-Gonzalez et al. [544] 318–318 14.5–14.5 10 AnT
Triglycidyl p-aminophenol Medina-Gonzalez et al. [544] 318–318 14.5–14.5 10 AnT
␥-Linolenic acid Poly(ethylene glycol) Kong et al. [67] 308–343 9–30 3.3 AnPTChro
␥-Linolenic acid ethyl ester Poly(ethylene glycol) Kong et al. [67] 313–343 9–16 3.3 AnPTChro
␥-Linolenic acid methyl ester Poly(ethylene glycol) Kong et al. [67] 313–343 8–16 3.3 AnPTChro
Glycerol carbonate Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether Medina-Gonzalez et al. [544] 318–318 14.5–14.5 10 AnT
Triglycidyl p-aminophenol Medina-Gonzalez et al. [544] 318–318 14.5–14.5 10 AnT
Glycerol carbonate acetate Bisphenol a diglycidyl ether Medina-Gonzalez [544] 318–318 14.5–14.5 10 AnT
Triglycidyl p-aminophenol Medina-Gonzalez et al. [544] 318–318 14.5–14.5 10 AnT
Glycidyl methacrylate Propane Franceschi et al. [301] 303–343 1.8–7..2 25 SynVisVar
Heptadecafluorodecyl methacrylate Poly(heptadecafluorodecyl acrylate) Shin et al. [673] 303–363 6.7–25.2 25 SynVisVar
45
n-Hexylcyclohexane Polystyrene Xu et al. [771] 393–393 6.5–18 21 SynVis
46
Table 39 (Continued)
Nitrogen 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane (isooctane) Zhang et al. [790] 273–273 3.7–3.9 474 AnT
Polyethylene terephthalate Faridi et al. [50] 323–373 5–12 45 AnTMla
N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone Potassium aurocyanide Rajasingam et al. [609] 308–308 5–11.8 150 AnT
N-Methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) N-Methylpyrrolidone Jou et al. [394] 273–423 0.1–19 n.a. AnT
n-Octane Thiophene Elizalde-Solis et al. [279] 334–383 3–14 100 AnTCapValVis
n-Pentane Isotactic poly(4-methyl-1-pentene) Fang et al. [288] 297–360 10.7–44.5 n.a. SynVisVar
Thiophene Elizalde-Solis et al. [279] 333–383 3–10.4 100 AnTCapValVis
n-Tetradecane Polystyrene Xu et al. [771] 393–393 6.5–18 21 SynVis
Octyl acrylate Poly(octyl acrylate) Byun et al. [99] 308–454 7–213.9 28 SynVisVar
Octyl methacrylate Poly(octyl acrylate) Byun et al. [99] 305–472 6.3–222.5 28 SynVisVar
o-Hydroxybenzoic acid Poly(methyl methacrylate) Diankov et al. [261] 313–313 12–20 100 AnT
Oleic acid Squalene Ruivo et al. [51] 313–333 14–22 n.a. AnPTcon
Oxygen Acetonitrile (ethanenitrile) Lopez-Castillo et al. [526] 313–313 0.6–8.2 n.a. AnTValVis
p-Aminobenzoic acid o-Phthalic acid Tian [716] 308–328 8–21 377 AnPTSemY
Perfluorohexane (PFC-72) Toluene Draucker et al. [269] 313–313 1.1–3.5 103 SynTVisVar
Perhydrofluorene Polystyrene Xu et al. [771] 393–393 6.5–18 21 SynVis
Table 40
Ternary systems: water + methane + X.
Table 41
Ternary systems: water + ethane + X.
2-Propanol (isopropanol) Mohammadi and Richon [553] 277–281 0.6–1.1 n.a. SynNon
Argon Maekawa [535] 273–276 0.4–1 700 AnTVis
Calcium chloride Mohammadi et al. [554] 270–283 0.4–2.5 57.5 SynNonVis
Diethanolamine (DEA) Jou and Mather [396] 298–398 0–13.2 n.a. AnTVcir
Diethylene glycol Afzal et al. [166] 275–285 0.8–2.8 n.a. SynNon
Ethanol Mohammadi et al. [556] 273–282 0.5–2.2 58 SynNon
Ethylene glycol Mohammadi et al. [557] 269–281 0.4–1.7 58 SynNon
Glycerol Mohammadi et al. [555] 264–286 0.4–3.6 58 SynNon
Krypton Maekawa [535] 273–276 0.4–1 700 AnTVis
Methane Kumar et al. [457] 273–273 1.4–1.4 n.a. SynNon
Wu and Englezos [766] 276–279 1.9–2.7 21.6 AnTVis
Methanol Mohammadi et al. [557] 268–280 0.5–2.6 58 SynNon
Monoethanolamine (MEA) Jou and Mather [396] 298–398 0–13.1 n.a. AnTVcir
Potassium chloride Mohammadi et al. [554] 270–282 0.4–2.1 57.5 SynNonVis
Sodium chloride Kim et al. [426] 278–281 10.1–15.1 n.a. SynVisVar
Mohammadi et al. [554] 272–284 0.5–2.9 57.5 SynNonVis
Triethylene glycol Mohammadi et al. [557] 274–281 0.5–1.7 58 SynNon
Xenon Maekawa [535] 276–278 0.2–0.8 700 AnTVis
48 J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69
Table 42
Ternary systems: water + propane + X.
2-Propanol (isopropanol) Mohammadi and Richon [553] 274–278 0.1–0.3 n.a. SynNon
Argon Maekawa [535] 273–276 0.1–0.7 700 AnTVis
Calcium chloride Mohammadi et al. [554] 271–276 0.1–0.4 58 SynNonVis
Diethylene glycol Afzal et al. [166] 272–277 0.2–0.5 n.a. SynNon
Ethanol Mohammadi et al. [556] 272–276 0.2–0.5 58 SynNon
Ethylene glycol Mohammadi et al. [557] 269–275 0.2–0.4 58 SynNon
Glycerol Mohammadi et al. [555] 272–276 0.2–0.5 58 SynNon
Krypton Maekawa [535] 273–278 0.1–0.5 700 AnTVis
Methane Kumar et al. [457] 273–273 0.5–0.5 n.a. SynNon
Wu and Englezos [766] 273–280 0.5–1.1 21.6 AnTVis
Methanol Mohammadi et al. [557] 266–275 0.2–0.4 58 SynNon
Potassium chloride Mohammadi et al. [554] 272–276 0.1–0.4 57.5 SynNonVis
Sodium chloride Mohammadi et al. [554] 271–275 0.2–0.4 57.5 SynNonVis
Sodium dodecyl sulfate Zhang et al. [789] 270–278 0.4–0.5 474 AnTVis
Triethylene glycol Mohammadi et al. [557] 273–276 0.2–0.4 58 SynNon
Xenon Maekawa [535] 276–278 0.1–0.3 700 AnTVis
Table 43
Ternary systems: water + hydrogen + X.
in polymer–solvent systems [99,100]. Koh et al. [101] used the mental apparatus is built around an autoclave cell, made of stainless
synthetic-visual method to study acid-in-CO2 emulsions for super- steel and equipped with two sapphire windows through which
critical fluid surface decontamination (SFSD) of radioactive metal the studied sample can be observed with the help of a polarizing
wastes. microscope coupled with a video camera. This technique allows the
Concerning the design of the view cell either an autoclave with detection of very small crystals, up to 2 m in length, even when
one or more windows is used or a tube made from a transparent their concentration is too low for other approaches.
material (e.g., pyrex glass). Most equilibrium cells are made of stainless steel or Nickel based
When only small quantities of a sample shall be used for an high-performance alloys, like Hastelloy C4, e.g. [95]. Gregorow-
experiment in a rather larger high-pressure view cell, e.g. to observe icz [104] selected titanium as material for his variable volume
solid–liquid–gas equilibria, a glass capillary can be placed inside a view-cell. As the reason he gives the comparatively low weight,
high-pressure view cell [95,102]. unfortunately, without reporting the actual weight of the cell.
Milhet et al. [103] used a very small cell with a volume The Cailletet apparatus of TU Delft [105] is the most frequently
of 0.03 cm3 for the visual observation of melting points and used type of apparatus for high-pressure phase equilibrium mea-
solid–liquid equilibria on n-alkanes at high pressures. The experi- surements. It consists of a thick-walled Pyrex glass tube (50 cm
Table 44
Ternary systems: water + krypton + X.
Table 45
Ternary systems: water + X + Y.
1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethanie (HFC-134a) Bis(2,2,3,3,3-pentatfluoropropyl)2- Liu et al. [523] 303–332 0.1–38 n.a. SynVisVar
sulfosuccinate
Bis(2,2,3,4,4,4-hexafluorobutyl)2- Liu et al. [523] 307–337 0.2–38 n.a. SynVisVar
sulfosuccinate
1-Butanol 1-n-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Najdanovic-Visak 254–346 0.1–4.2 24 SynVisVar
bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide et al. [570]
2-Propanol (isopropanol) Sodium acetate Bermejo et al. [188] 396–459 0.4–1.8 n.a. SynVis
Sodium oleate Bermejo et al. [188] 400–459 0.4–1.6 n.a. SynVis
Ammonia Lithium bromide Wu et al. [768] 287–356 0–2.6 769 AnT
Lithium nitrate Libotean et al. [502] 293–353 0–2 166 SynT
Methanol Schäfer et al. [635] 313–393 0–1.5 1600 AnT
Decalin Tetralin Brunner et al. [197] 524–664 4.4–28.5 30 SynVis
Difluoromethane (HFC-32) 2-Methyl-2-propanol Imai et al. [376] 268–287 0.1–1.1 70.7 SynNon
2-Propanol (isopropanol) Imai et al. [376] 268–288 0.1–1.2 70.7 SynNon
2-Propanone Imai et al. [376] 268–284 0–0.7 70.7 SynNon
Cyclopentane Imai et al. [374] 280–299 0–1.5 70 SynNon
Fluorocyclopentane Imai et al. [375] 288–299 0.1–1 70.7 SynNon
Tetra-n-butylammonium bromide Imai et al. [374] 286–289 0.1–1.2 70 SynNon
Diglycolamine (DGA) Benzene Valtz et al. [732] 292–393 0–0.4 n.a. SynTVis
Ethylbenzene Diglycolamine (DGA) Coquelet et al. [231] 294–394 0–0.3 n.a. SynTVis
Methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) Benzene Valtz et al. [732] 291–402 0–0.6 n.a. SynTVis
Methylfluoride Cyclopentane Takeya et al. [709] 287–305 0.1–2.9 138.2 SynNon
Cyclopentene Takeya et al. [709] 283–300 0.1–1.9 138.2 SynNon
Fluorocyclopentane Takeya et al. [709] 290–307 0.1–2.5 138.2 SynNon
Methylcyclohexane Takeya and Ohmura 273–294 0.1–2.7 202 SynNon
[708]
Tetrahydrofuran Takeya et al. [709] 284–301 0.1–1.8 138.2 SynNon
Natural gas n-Propanol Chapoy et al. [126] 289–290 9.9–10 500 SynNon
Nitrogen Ethylene glycol Abdi et al. [163] 263–283 15–20 n.a. AnT
Tetrabutyl ammonium bromide Arjmandi et al. [176] 285–292 4.6–33.5 2400 SynNon
Propene 2-Propanol (isopropanol) Grigiante et al. [326] 313–313 1.3–1.6 80 AnTCapValVis
Synthetic natural gas p-Toluene sulfonic acid Rovetto et al. [127] 285–3 285–3 200 SynNon
Toluene Diglycolamine Valtz et al. [733] 292–394 0–0.3 n.a. SynTVis
Methyldiethanolamine Valtz et al. [733] 295–392 0–0.3 n.a. SynTVis
Trans-decalin Cis-Decalin Brunner et al. [197] 521–647 4.2–22 30 SynVis
Xenon 1,1-Dimethylcyclohexane Sugahara et al. [702] 274–301 0.1–2.7 10 SynVis
Cis-1,2-Dimethylcyclohexane Sugahara et al. [702] 274–283 0.1–0.4 10 SynVis
Cis-1,4-Dimethylcyclohexane Sugahara et al. [702] 274–283 0.1–2.7 10 SynVis
Trans-1,2-dimethylcyclohexane Sugahara et al. [702] 274–283 0.1–2.7 10 SynVis
Table 46
Ternary systems: methane + X + Y.
long, 3 mm inner diameter) with the open end placed in an auto- be placed into a high-pressure vessel. An example is the apparatus
clave and immersed in mercury. The mercury confines the sample of Hong et al. [106] who used a thick-walled quartz tube containing
in the Cailletet tube. the sample that has a floating piston and is positioned in a win-
Transparent tubes are limited concerning their maximum pres- dowed, agitated, invertible, high-pressure cell. The floating piston
sures before they crack or burst. For higher pressures, the tube can separates the sample volume from a transparent overburden fluid.
Table 47
Ternary systems: ethene + X + Y.
1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a) 1,1-Difluoroethane (HFC-152a) Polystyrene Li et al. [73] 403–463 1.2–5.6 n.a. AnGrav
Ethanol Polystyrene Choudhary et al. [114] 423–460 1.3–9 n.a. SynVisCon
Methylsuccinic acid Itaconic acid Abbott et al. [89] 383–383 5–20.5 25 AnOth
Table 49
Multicomponent systems: carbon dioxide + water + X + Y (+. . .).
To reduce time for equilibration most frequently magnetic stir- Using the synthetic-visual method (V = 100 cm3 ) Melnikov
rer bars are used, usually to agitate the liquid phase. Tsuji et al. et al. [113] reliably recorded for the first time the formation
[107] used a magnetic stirrer bar that is positioned in the top part of metastable (supercooled) water upon dissociation of propane
of their view cell, a pyrex glass tube. The Cailletet tubes of TU Delft hydrates in the temperature range 257–270 K.
[105] are agitated with a stainless steel ball driven by reciprocat- To measure the solubilities of gases or blowing agents in vis-
ing magnets. Visual cells equipped with a rocking mechanism to cous polymer melt systems the synthetic-visual method can be
facilitate the attainment of equilibrium are only rarely used, e.g. by used with a continous feed of the components by means of a foam-
AlNashef et al. [108]. ing extruder [114]. The solid polymer is melted in the extruder
To improve the detection of phase transitions, some authors (twin screw or single screw) and saturated with a gas or a blowing
used laser light scattering techniques [109,110]. Masui et al. [111] agent. An optical flow cell and a manually controlled valve were
introduced image analysis for the determination of the critical installed at the end of the extruder. Solubility data are generated
parameters of n-butane. Pictures taken from the variable-volume by observing/recording the onset of bubble formation/dissolution
view cell by a CCD camera were cut to the region where the phase in the gas-laden melt through the window using a microscope-CCD
behavior is observed best. The color image was then transformed camera-monitor/recorder system.
into a monochromatic image for determination of relative bright- Equivalent to analytical continous flow methods, continous-
ness (LR) of each picture. Using this method the existence of a feed synthetic-visual methods have the advantage of that the
meniscus can be detected in a reliable way. substances are kept only for a short time at the desired temper-
Some authors used spectroscopic methods to get additional ature, so that thermal degradation can be reduced when critical
information, e.g. Hashimoto et al. [112] confirmed by use of Raman points are measured at high temperatures. Gil et al. [115] describe
spectroscopy that H2 is enclathrated in the hydrate cages by a flow apparatus (SynVisConPcTc) that is suitable for the measure-
adding a small amount of tetrahydrofuran or tetra-n-butyl ammo- ment of critical points of pure components and of binary mixtures.
nium. The loading section consists of two thermostatic chromatography
52 J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69
Table 50
Multicomponent systems: carbon dioxide + X + Y (+. . .).
Table 51
Multicomponent systems: methane + X + Y (+. . .).
Diglycolamine (DGA) + benzene + water Valtz et al. [732] 298–393 0.5–5 n.a. AnTCapValVis
Ethane + propane + 2-methylpropane(isobutane) + Mørch et al. [562] 236–278 0.3–9.4 n.a. SynVis
n-butane + n-pentane
Ethane + propane + water Kumar et al. [457] 273–273 0.7–0.7 n.a. SynNon
Ethane + water + glycerol Wu and Englezos [766] 274–281 2.1–4.7 21.6 AnTVis
Ethane + water + n-butane Mohammadi et al. [551] 277–292 0.5–3.2 34 AnTValVis
Ethane + water + p-toluene sulfonic acid Rovetto et al. [127] 284–284 3.5–3.5 200 SynNon
Ethane + water + triethylene glycol Wu and Englezos [766] 272–282 1.5–4.5 21.6 AnTVis
Ethene + water + tetrahydrofuran Ma et al. [529] 274–274 1.1–1.8 256 AnT
Ma et al. [529] 277–288 0.1–2.4 60 SynVisVar
Zhang et al. [794] 273–282 2–4.5 256 AnT
Zhang et al. [795] 277–288 0.1–4 60 SynVisVar
Ethylbenzene + diglycolamine (DGA) + water Coquelet et al. [231] 298–393 0.5–5 n.a. AnTCapValVis
Ethylbenzene + methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) + water Coquelet et al. [231] 333–333 0.5–0.5 n.a. AnTCapValVis
Hydrogen + nitrogen + tetrahydrofuran + water Ma et al. [529] 274–274 6–7.4 256 AnT
Hydrogen + water + tetrahydrofuran Ma et al. [529] 278–278 1.4–6.2 256 AnT
Zhang et al. [796] 277–285 0.1–8.8 60 SynVisVar
n-Hexane + nitrogen + n-decane Uribe-Vargas and Trejo [728] 258–258 3.4–11.9 n.a. AnTVal
Propane + water + glycerol Wu and Englezos [766] 274–281 0.8–1.9 21.6 AnTVis
Propane + water + triethylene glycol Wu and Englezos [766] 273–281 0.7–2.2 21.6 AnTVis
Water + diethanolamine (DEA) + toluene Valtz et al. [733] 298–353 0.5–0.5 n.a. AnTCapValVis
Water + diglycolamine (DGA) + toluene Valtz et al. [733] 298–393 0.4–5 n.a. AnTCapValVis
Water + ethane + magnesium chloride + sodium chloride Atik et al. [178] 278–286 6.1–18.6 n.a. SynNon
Water + ethane + n-butane Chapoy et al. [217] 303–361 0.5–4.9 20 AnTCapValVis
Water + ethane + propane + 2-methylpropane Folas et al. [65] 263–293 1.5–6 300 AnPTSemY
(isobutane) + n-butane
Water + ethene + sodium dodecyl sulfate Zhang et al. [793] 273–278 2.5–5.5 256 AnTVis
Water + methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) + benzene Valtz et al. [732] 298–393 0.4–8.1 n.a. AnTCapValVis
Water + methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) +toluene Valtz et al. [733] 298–393 0.4–8.1 n.a. AnTCapValVis
Water + monoethanolamine (MEA) + toluene Valtz et al. [733] 298–353 0.5–0.5 n.a. AnTCapValVis
J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69 53
Table 52
Multicomponent systems: X + Y (+. . .).
syringe pumps in which the pure substances (liquids or lique- method to determine the pT melting curve of ionic liquids. Search-
fied gases) are stored and that provide a flow of defined constant ing critical points with an acoustic method, e.g. Esperança et al.
composition (=synthetic method). The measuring part includes a [120], has the advantage that even for temperatures several degrees
transparent cell (a sapphire tube pressed between two Titanium above the critical point, the sound velocity exhibits a minimum
flanges) placed in an air thermostatic bath. The internal volume when measured isothermally as a function of pressure.
of the cell is approximately 4 cm3 . Pressure and temperature are If the total volume of a variable-volume cell can be measured
adjusted until critical opalescence is observed. accurately, the appearance of a new phase can be obtained from
With 36.0% of all systems investigated in this review, synthetic- the abrupt change in slope on the pressure–volume plot more
visual methods were the most frequently used type of method. accurately than by visual observation, e.g. Kodama et al. [121].
As an alternative pVT measurements can be performed and the
3.2.2. Synthetic-non-visual methods (SynNon) intersection of isochors can be used to determine points on the
As an alternative to visual observation, other physical proper- coexistence curve. A sharp change in the slope, (dp/dT), occurs at
ties can be monitored to detect phase transitions. Haramagatti et al. the phase boundary. Stievano and Elvassore [122] measured the
[116] made use of small angle neutron scattering in combination liquid density in a liquid recirculation loop of a variable-volume
with optical Raman spectroscopy instead of visible light, as the cell while the volume was slowly expanded. Because vapor and
basis of phase detection, while Kandil et al. [117] used a microwave liquid phases have different compressibilities, the slope of curves
re-entrant resonator to detect the appearance of dew and bubble changes at the VLE equilibrium point. The equilibrium point can
points in hydrocarbon systems. be evaluated intersecting two gas-like and liquid-like correlations
Eckert and coworkers [118] proposed a synthetic-non-visual obtained for either density–pressure or window (=movable piston)
method to measure the solubility of solids in CO2 . First the cell is displacement–pressure profiles. The authors confirmed the results
charged with the solid. Then it is pressurized with CO2 and stirred by visual observation of small vapor bubble formation in the VLE
constantly. Equilibrium of the mixture is observed in situ by period- cell at equilibrium conditions.
ically taking spectra (UV absorbance) of the solution. The pressure Spilimbergo et al. [123] used high-pressure differential scan-
is raised stepwise until no further significant increase in the peak ning calorimetry (DSC) to study solid–liquid–vapor equilibria of
absorbance is observed. This means that all solids had been dis- high-pressure gases with solid lipids. Maeda et al. [124] studied
solved in the fluid phase, the phase change has been detected. solid–solid phase transitions of a thermotropic cubic mesogen (=the
Phase changes can be detemined using sound of speed measure- fundamental unit of a liquid crystal that induces structural order in
ments. Since the acoustic wave excited in a sample for the speed of the crystals) with high-pressure differential thermal analysis (DTA)
sound measurement is strongly absorbed in the gas phase as com- at pressures up to 300 MPa.
pared to the absorption in the liquid phase, the appearance of the Kutcherov and Chernoutsan [125] investigated two sequential
gas phase can be detected by the change of the acoustic echo sig- phase transitions, a wide range crystallization and glass transi-
nal. Speed of sound measurements can be also used for solid–liquid tion, of different crude oils and their fractions at high pressures by
phase changes, e.g. Gomes de Azevedo et al. [119] used an acoustic measuring the thermal conductivity using the transient hot-wire
54
Table 53
Complex systems X + Y (+. . .).
Heavy fractions of Kumkolsk oil Kutcherov [471] 275–320 0.1–1000 n.a. SynNon
Heavy fractions of Usinsk oil Kutcherov [471] 275–320 0.1–1000 n.a. SynNon
Kalchinsk oil Kutcherov [471] 275–320 0.1–1000 n.a. SynNon
Komsomolsk oil Kutcherov [471] 275–320 0.1–1000 n.a. SynNon
Kumkolsk oil Kutcherov [471] 275–320 0.1–1000 n.a. SynNon
Shtokman condensate Kutcherov [471] 275–320 0.1–1000 n.a. SynNon
Usinsk oil Kutcherov [471] 275–320 0.1–1000 n.a. SynNon
Verhozimsk oil Kutcherov [471] 275–320 0.1–1000 n.a. SynNon
Vostochno-Gorinsk oil Kutcherov [471] 275–320 0.1–1000 n.a. SynNon
1,1,1,3,3-Pentafluoropropane Synthetic polyester compressor Zhelezny et al. [810] 333–424 0.3–3.4 191 SynT
(HFC-245fa) oil Planetelf ACD 100FY
2-Methylpropane (isobutane) Mineral compressor oil Azmol Zhelezny et al. [809] 303–363 0.2–1.4 14 SynTVis
Table 54
Binary systems with hydrates: water + X.
method as well as the isochoric heat capacity by using differential To investigate the phase behavior in porous media, non-visual
scanning calorimetry. The range of pressures was from atmospheric methods are particularly advantageous. Kang et al. [128] used
to 1.2 GPa. the isochoric temperature cycle method to investigate the phase
Tohidi and coworkers [126] and Sloan and coworkers [127] used behavior of methane and CO2 hydrates in meso- and macro-sized
a synthetic-non-visual method to determine pressure and temper- porous media. To identify the crystalline structure of the gas
ature at which hydrates form in a certain mixture by performing hydrates formed in the silica gel pores and to compare them with
an isochoric temperature cycle. Once the cell is charged with the those of the bulk state hydrate, an NMR spectrometer was used.
desired components, the mixing is started and the temperature of Ayirala and Rao [129] developed a technique to determine the
the cell is lowered, a linear decrease in pressure is observed, reflect- miscibility of gas–oil systems, which they call “VIT – vanishing
ing the isochoric cooling of the sample. This pressure–temperature interfacial tension”. This method is based on the concept that, at
response is called ‘the pT cooling curve’. Hydrate formation initi- miscibility, the value of interfacial tension between the two phases
ates after sub-cooling the sample (usually more than 4 K below the is zero. The interfacial tension between the injected gas and crude
estimated equilibrium temperature). This process can be identi- oil at reservoir temperature is measured in a capillary in a high-
fied by a sudden drop in pressure (due to gas consumption as the pressure view cell at varying pressures. The miscibility conditions
gas is enclathrated into the hydrate lattice), together with a tem- are then determined by extrapolating the plot between interfacial
perature increase of the sample (due to the exothermic hydrate tension against pressure to zero interfacial tension.
crystallization process). The bath temperature is then kept con- To measure the critical temperature of thermally unstable sub-
stant to allow further hydrate formation to proceed, until no further stance, the pulse-heating method, as described by Nikitin and
decrease in pressure is observed. This process typically requires coworkers [130], can be used. It is based on measuring the pres-
more than 8 h to be completed [127]. The temperature is then sure dependence of the temperature of the attainable superheat
increased stepwise, hydrates dissociate, causing an increase in the (spontaneous boiling-up) of a liquid with the help of a thin wire
pressure of the cell. This pressure temperature dependence is called probe heated by pulses of electric current. When the pressure in
the “pT heating curve”. Rovetto et al. [127] obtained the heating the liquid approaches the critical pressure, the temperature of the
curve by increasing the temperature of the sample in steps of 1 K attainable superheat approaches the critical temperature.
with intervals of at least 8 h between each step, in order to ensure A continous-feed synthetic-non-visual method (SynNonCon)
that the system had achieved thermodynamic equilibrium at each that looks at first sight like an analytical continous-flow method
temperature step. Outside the hydrate region, only a small pres- (AnPTCon) was used by VonNiederhausern et al. [131] to determine
sure increase is seen, due to thermal expansion, and heating curve the critical points of thermally unstable or reactive components. To
and cooling curve coincide. The hydrate dissociation point for each achieve very short residence times, a sample of precisely known
experiment is determined from the intersection of both (cooling composition is continuously displaced and heated in a capillary
and heating) curves. This point represents the equilibrium transi- tube. No analyis of the samples takes place. To determine the crit-
tion hydrate + liquid + gas → liquid + gas. The procedure is repeated ical point, several temperature scans must be made in the vicinity
at different pressures in order to determine the hydrate phase of the critical point. Below the critical point, the temperature scan
boundaries over a wide temperature range making it a very time will show a flat, horizontal region indicative of isothermal boiling.
consuming method. Above the critical point, the transition region is no longer flat and
56 J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69
Table 55
Ternary systems with hydrates: water + X + Y.
Table 55 (Continued)
horizontal. The critical point is inferred by the temperature and dioxide UO2+x at high pressures. The determination of the phase-
pressure where isothermal boiling is no longer observed. transition boundaries for the uranium–oxygen system is of great
Poliakoff and coworkers [132,133] developed a fibre optic reflec- importance in the nuclear industry. Knowledge about the melting
tometer (FOR) technique to monitor refractive index and density transition in the nuclear fuel is particularly important in the analy-
changes in gases, liquids and supercritical fluids. The key oper- sis of hypothetical meltdown accidents, as it defines the structural
ating principle is the measurement of the intensity of light from limit of a combustible element. Temperatures of almost 3200 K
a light emitting diode (LED) which is reflected from the end of were needed. Such high temperatures can be measured optically by
a fibre immersed in the medium. The amount of reflected light pyrometry. Two pulsed Nd-YAG laser beams were mixed through a
depends on the difference between the refractive indices of the suitable optical system in the same fibre and then focused onto the
fibre and the medium. The refractive index of the medium is related sample surface. The pulse with the higher power peak was used to
in turn to its density. The FOR is particularly sensitive to phase sep- heat the sample above the melting point; the other one, less pow-
aration, because of the density discontinuity which accompanies erful, but of longer duration, was used to control the cooling rate
the separation. Wu et al. [133] used FOR to detect phase changes on the sample surface. This lead to a much better definition of the
in a continous-feed synthetic-non-visual method (SynNonCon) to freezing plateau. Pressure was applied by using helium.
determine the phase boundaries of CO2 + solvent systems. Diamond anvil cells are particularly suitable for non-visual mea-
The experiments at the highest temperatures of all articles surements at very high pressures [8]. The selective transparency of
covered in this review were performed by Manara et al. [134]. diamond from IR to X-ray and gamma-ray radiations permits in situ
They investigated the melting point of hyperstochiometric uranium measurements during experiments.
58 J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69
Table 56
Multicomponent and complex systems with hydrates: water + X + Y (+. . .).
Carbon dioxide + methane + neohexane Beltrán and Servio [97] 275–285 1.3–6.1 150 SynVisVar
Methane + ethane + p-toluene sulfonic acid Rovetto et al. [127] 284–284 3.5–3.5 200 SynNon
Carbon dioxide + hydrogen + tetrahydrofuran Hashimoto et al. [341] 280–280 0.2–3.6 150 AnTVis
Carbon dioxide + hydrogen + propane Kumar et al. [456] 274–282 2.5–9.7 n.a. AnTVis
Methane + ethane + propane Kumar et al. [457] 273–273 0.7–0.7 n.a. SynNon
Carbon dioxide + nitrogen + tetrahydrofuran Lingaet al. [511] 273–273 1.5–1.5 323 AnTVis
Methane + ethene + tetrahydrofuran Ma et al. [529] 274–274 1.1–1.8 256 AnT
Ma et al. [529] 277–288 0.1–2.4 60 SynVisVar
Methane + hydrogen + tetrahydrofuran Ma et al. [529] 278–278 1.4–6.2 256 AnT
Methane + ethane + triethylene glycol Wu and Englezos [766] 272–282 1.5–4.5 21.6 AnTVis
Methane + propane + triethylene glycol Wu and Englezos [766] 273–281 0.7–2.2 21.6 AnTVis
Methane + ethane + glycerol Wu and Englezos [766] 274–281 2.1–4.7 21.6 AnTVis
Methane + propane + glycerol Wu and Englezos [766] 274–281 0.8–1.9 21.6 AnTVis
Methane + ethene + sodium dodecyl sulfate Zhang et al. [793] 273–278 2.5–5.5 256 AnTVis
Methane + ethene + tetrahydrofuran Zhang et al. [794] 273–282 2–4.5 256 AnT
Zhang et al. [795] 277–288 0.1–4 60 SynVisVar
Hydrogen + methane + tetrahydrofuran Zhang et al. [796] 277–285 0.1–8.8 60 SynVisVar
Methane + ethane + magnesium chloride + sodium Atik et al. [178] 278–286 6.1–18.6 n.a. SynNon
chloride
Methane + hydrogen + nitrogen + tetrahydrofuran Ma et al. [529] 274–274 6–7.4 256 AnT
Carbon dioxide + nitrogen + methane + ethane + Arjmandi et al. [176] 280–292 0.9–9.5 2400 SynNon
propane + 2-methyl propane + n-butane +
2-methyl butane + tetra-n-butylammonium
bromide
Using a multi-anvil cell and energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction thermodynamic derivatives, one is always thermal and the other
with synchroton radiation, Solozhenko et al. [92] studied the phase mechanical. During an isobaric temperature scan both the heat flux
behavior of boron + boron(III) oxide at 5 GPa and temperatures up and the volume variations are recorded. The transitiometer consists
to 2750 K. Solozhenko described the apparatus in an earlier publi- of a calorimeter equipped with high-pressure vessels, and a pVT
cation [135]. A boron-epoxy gasket was used as the compressing system. Machado et al. [138] used the transitiometric method to
medium between the conical tungsten carbide anvils. The sample measure solid–solid transition and melting temperatures for long
volume is only 7 mm3 , the smallest volume of all articles covered n-alkanes at high pressures.
in the period of this review. A new approach to locating the dew points, bubble points and
Randzio developed and described [136,137] the transitiomet- critical points of fluid mixtures was developed by Poliakoff and
ric method for the investigation of phase transitions. Scanning coworkers [139,140] utilizing a shear mode piezoelectric sensor.
transitiometry is based on a simultaneous recording of both This technique employs a single piece of quartz crystal that is
mechanical and thermal variables of a thermodynamic transition installed at the bottom of a strongly stirred high-pressure ves-
induced by scanning one independent variable (p, T or V) while sel. The sensor response indicates whether liquid or gas is in
the other independent variables are kept constant. The appara- contact with its surfaces. Thus, the sensor is able to identify
tus (“transitiometer”) permits to determine simultaneously two vapor–liquid phase separation by registering a discontinuity in
Table 57
Articles containing corrigenda, comments, or rebuttals to comments.
Chapoy et al. [821] 2003 Methane, water Chapoy et al. [216] 2005 Corrigendum
Kamps et al. [823] 2003 CO2 , [bmim] [PF6 ] Kumelan et al. [461] 2006 Corrigendum
Zhang and Kiran [825] 2003 CO2 , tetrahydrofuran, polysulfone Zhang and Kiran [801] 2006 Corrigendum
Glos et al. [822] 2004 Propane Glos et al. [218] 2006 Corrigendum
Levitin et al. [824] 2004 CO2 , methanol, water, tetramethylammonium Levitin et al. [489] 2005 Corrigendum
bicarbonate
Kong et al. [437] 2005 CO2 , trinervonin, triarachidonin Kong et al. [438] 2005 Corrigendum
Kumelan et al. [458] 2005 CO2 , 1-N-butyl-3-methylimidazolium Kumelan et al. [464] 2007 Corrigendum
hexafluorophosphate ([bmim] [PF6 ])
Park et al. [592] 2006 CO2 , dimethyl ether, HFCFC-22, HFC-23, HFC152a, Park et al. [591] 2006 Corrigendum + Addition
poly(-caprolactone), poly(l-lactide), polystyrene
Yarrison et al. [774] 2006 Water, methane, ethane Kontogeorgis and Yan [441] 2007 Comment
Bazaev et al. [183] 2007 CO2 , ethanol Bazaev et al. [185] 2008 Corrigendum
Folas et al. [299] 2007 Water, methane, ethylene glycol Mohammadi and Richon [552] 2007 Comment
Folas et al. [300] 2007 Reply to Comments
Han et al. [335] 2007 Difluoromethane (HFC-32), pentafluoroethane Han et al. [336] 2008 Corrigendum
(HFC-125)
Ren and Scurto [141] 2007 CO2 , 1-n-hexyl-3-methyl-imidazolium Ren and Scurto [826] 2008 Publisher’s Note
bis(trifyl)imide, n-decane
Madani et al. [530] 2008 Hexafluoroethane (PFC-116), Mandani et al. [531] 2008 Corrigendum
1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a)
Kaboudvand and 2008 CO2 , tridodecylamine Kaboudvand and Ghaziaskar [402] 2008 Corrigendum
Ghaziaskar [401]
Zhang et al. [790] 2008 CO2 , 2,2,4-trimethylpentane (isooctane) Jaubert and Vitu [383] 2008 Comment
Zhang et al. [791] 2008 Reply to Comments
J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69 59
the impedance minimum of the sensor as a function of pres- and with inverse gas chromatography (AnPTChro). These meth-
sure. ods differ in the underlying experimental principles as well as in
the complexity of data analysis. Despite of these differences, the
3.2.3. Synthetic-isothermal methods (SynT) agreement of the measured VLE data is excellent.
Synthetic-isothermal methods are performed without a phase
transition, where the pressure of a synthesized multi-phase mix- 3.2.4. Synthetic-isobaric methods (SynP)
ture is measured at isothermal conditions and phase compositions The boiling temperature of a synthesized mixture is measured
are calculated using the material balance. Prior to an experiment, at isobaric conditions and phase compositions are calculated using
all substances have to be carefully degassed. An equilibrium cell the material balance. As opposed to analytical isobaric methods
is charged with a known amount of the first component and ther- (AnP), no sampling or analysis is performed. Just as synthetic-
mostated to a given temperature. Then, a known amount of the isothermal methods (SynT), synthetic-isobaric methods (SynP) are
second component is added whereby the pressure increases. The performed without a phase transition. When used for a pure com-
second component dissolves into the liquid phase, which leads to a ponent – the composition is given anyway – the synthetic-isobaric
decay of the pressure in the equilibrium cell. Therefore, this method method delivers the vapor pressure, e.g. Ewing and Ochoa [153].
is also called pressure-decay method, especially when a polymer is Then, it is often called the “dynamic” vapor–pressure method. Typ-
used as the first component. After equilibration pressure and tem- ically, isobaric experiments are performed in an ebulliometer as
perature are registered. No samples are taken. The composition of described in Section 3.1.3 (AnP). An ebulliometer was first used to
the vapor phase is calculated using a phase equilibrium model or determine the molecular weights of substances, by measuring the
assumed as just containing the pure gas, as it is feasible for example changes of the boiling point of water caused by the presence of
when the solubility in polymers or in other compounds with negli- the unknown substance. Twin ebulliometry can be used to deter-
gible volatility is considered. The composition of the liquid phase is mine the activity coefficient at infinite dilution. The temperature
calculated using the material balance from the known total compo- difference between an ebulliometer filled with the first (pure) com-
sition, the composition of the vapor phase and the phase densities ponent and a second ebulliometer (under the same pressure) filled
and volumes, e.g. using the equations given by Ren and Scurto [141]. with the first component and with a small amount of a second
By repeating the addition of the second component into the cell, component (diluted solution) is measured. From the difference of
several points along the boiling-point line can be measured. To get the boiling temperatures, the activity coefficient at infinite dilution
a complete boiling-point line, the isothermal experiment has to be can be calculated. Usually synthetic-isobaric methods are used to
performed again, this time starting with the second component and measure low-pressure data.
adding the first. Ewing and Ochoa [154] used comparative ebulliometry to pre-
At lower pressures synthetic-isothermal methods are very cisely determine the vapor pressure of pure components at high
commonly used [142–144]. They are often designated as “static pressures. The sample and a reference fluid are boiled in separate
method” or “isothermal pTx method”. Examples for the applica- ebulliometers under a common pressure of gas such as helium or
tion of the synthetic-isothermal methods at high pressures are nitrogen, and the condensation temperatures of the sample and of
given by Liu and Tomasko [145] who determinded the solubility the reference fluid are measured. The common pressure is calcu-
of low-boiling substances in polymers, or by Shaharun et al. [146], lated from the known vapor pressure of the reference fluid. The
Kim et al. [147], and Gruszkiewicz and Simonson [148] who deter- method has many advantages: direct measurement of pressure is
mined the solubility of gases in organic solvents, ionic liquids, or avoided, the fluids are degassed by boiling, and the ebulliome-
electrolyte solutions. ters act as heat pipes to provide high-performance thermostats.
When used for a pure component, the synthetic-isothermal The corresponding disadvantages are the considerable demands on
method delivers the vapor pressure, e.g. Anderson et al. [149]. Then, thermometry, the solubility of the buffer gas at high pressures, and
it is often called the “static” vapor–pressure method. thermal gradients due to pressure heads. But the greatest advan-
Ogata et al. [150] used the synthetic-isothermal method to mea- tage is speed of measurement; typically, a pressure–temperature
sure the absorption of hydrogen in tetrahydrofuran hydrates. For point can be obtained in an hour.
a given temperature, they determined the storage capacity of the
hydrate as a function of pressure. 3.2.5. Other synthetic methods (SynOth)
The synthetic-isothermal method can be used in combination Properties measured in the homogenous or heterogeneous
with other methods, often in the same apparatus. For exam- region are used to calculate the phase boundaries.
ple, when gas-solubilities are measured with synthetic-isothermal Polikhronidi et al. [155] used one-phase and two-phase iso-
method in a view cell, the formation of solids could be determined choric heat capacity measurements to determine the values of the
with the synthetic-visual (SynVis) method. Efimchenko et al. [151] temperatures and densities at saturation and of the critical param-
combined the synthetic-isothermal method with the synthetic- eters (TC , pC , C ) for the CO2 + n-decane system. They call their
non-visual method to measure the deuterium solubility in heavy method quasi-static thermogram technique. Matsuda et al. [156]
water and the formation of high-pressure cubic clathrate ice. measured excess molar enthalpies hE of the CO2 + diisopropyl ether
Petermann et al. [79] presented a new experimental technique system using a flow-type isothermal microcalorimeter both in the
to measure directly the selective sorption of gas mixtures up to homogeneous liquid region and in the two-phase region. The liquid
high pressures. They combine an analytical gravimetric method composition of CO2 at the phase boundary for a certain temperature
(AnGrav) with a synthetic-isothermal method (SynT), which they and pressure was determined from the intersection of the hE -curves
call “gravimetric-volumetric method”. By combining both mea- in the homogeneous liquid region and in the two-phase region.
suring effects (mass increase measured with magnetic suspension For systems with two degrees of freedom (e.g., binary two-phase
balance and pressure drop from the volumetric measurement) the equilibria or ternary three-phase equilibria), the compositions
co-adsorption equilibrium of binary gas or vapor mixtures can be are fixed when temperature and pressure are given. Shiflett and
measured. To measure the sorption of three gases, samples from Yokozeki [157] investigated the phase behavior of a univariant
the vapor phase have to taken and analyzed (AnTYGrav). system: VLLE in a binary system. If the system temperature T
Krüger et al. [152] compared results of the synthetic-isothermal is fixed, then all other thermodynamic intensive variables (pres-
method (SynT) for VLE of the n-pentane + poly(dimethylsiloxane) sure, compositions, and molar volumes in each phase) are uniquely
system with results of the gravimetric sorption method (AnGrav) determined, regardless of any given overall-feed composition. The
60 J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69
overall feed composition merely changes the physical volume in In the following, we summarize some points that are important
each liquid phase and gas phase, but the composition and molar vol- for experimental methods for phase equilbrium measurement.
ume in each phase remain constant as long as the three phases exist
at the fixed T. They prepared a set of VLLE solutions with three dif- 3.3.1.1. Charging of the cell – synthesis of the mixture
ferent feed compositions in three sample containers (alternatively, 1. All parts of the apparatus need to be clean at the beginning of the
the same equilibrium cell could be used in three experimental runs) experiment. The possibility of dirty corners or parts of the appa-
and measured the volume of each phase at constant T. With the use ratus which are difficult to clean should be minimized already
of the mass balance, the compositions and molar volumes of the during the design of the apparatus (important for all methods).
three phases were calculated. 2. Pure and degassed substances should be used (even more impor-
Bazaev et al. [158] used isochoric pvTx measurements in the sin- tant for synthetic methods).
gle phase region (remark: otherwise it would be SynT) to derive 3. The mixture must be prepared very precisely (essential for syn-
equilibrium properties. Saturated liquid and vapor densities were thetic methods).
derived by extrapolation of measured pVT data to the saturation 4. It has to be ensured that the investigated components are stable
pressure. The values of the saturated properties (saturated tem- during the entire time of experiment especially during long-time
peratures and vapor–pressures) for measured isochors were also experiments at higher temperatures.
derived by using the isochoric and isothermal break-point tech-
niques.
3.3.1.2. Equilibration
3.3. Important points for experimental methods 1. The involved phases should be sufficiently mixed to ensure an
efficient equilibration (important for all methods).
Even though most of the experimental methods have been used 2. It has to be ensured, that the time for equilibration is sufficiently
for decades, the knowledge of how to get precise results with a long (important for all methods). In case of using continuous
certain method and how to avoid mistakes is not generally known. flow methods (AnPT) the flow rates need to be sufficiently
Good measurements are not easy to perform, many mistakes can low.
be made. Experience is very important. In many cases, the quality 3. The conditions (temperature, composition) should be constant
of the personnel performing and supervising the experiment has everywhere in the equilibrium cell. Leaks are unacceptable.
a higher impact on the results than details of the equipment. This Dead spots which are not at the conditions of the desired
shall be illustrated by the following example. phase equilibrium have to be avoided (important for all meth-
In 2005 Cheng and Chen [159] from National Taiwan Univer- ods).
sity (Taipeh) measured the CO2 + isopropyl acetate system using 4. The conditions (temperature and pressure) should be
an analytical isothermal method with liquid phase recirculation measured precisely which implies the calibration of the
and online sampling (AnTLcirValVis, V = 320 cm3 , GC analysis). pressure and temperature sensors. Thereby it should
Cheng and Chen estimated the accuracy of their measured equilib- be ensured, that the calibration is always done for the
rium compositions as ±0.2 mol%. Three years later Kodama et al. entire range of measurement. Furthermore it should be
[160] from Nihon University (Fukushima, Japan) measured the kept in mind that the relative error of pressure measure-
same system using a synthetic-non-visual method, determining the ments is higher at lower pressures and dependent on the
boiling-point pressure for a given mixture from the abrupt change maximum pressure of the transducer (important for all
in slope on the pressure–volume plot (SynNonVisVar). Since they methods).
measured a significantly higher CO2 solubility in the liquid phase, 5. It has to be considered that a small change of pres-
by a factor of 30 outside of the range of accuracy given by Cheng and sure or temperature leads to a phase split, e.g. par-
Chen, they measured the system again using an analytical isother- tial condensation. This is particularly important if a satu-
mal method with recirculation of both phases and online sampling rated phase is flowing, e.g. in circulation lines (e.g. AnTV-
(AnTVLcirValVis, V = 320 cm3 , GC analysis). The results showed that cir).
both data sets of Kodama et al. measured with different methods 6. It must be also considered that temperature might change
agreed well within 0.9 mol%, while the two data sets measured with a measuring signal, e.g. the signal of a pressure trans-
the analytical isothermal method by different authors differed by ducer.
7.9 mol%.
Such significant discrepancies between phase equilibria data 3.3.1.3. Analysis and determination of a phase transition
determined by different authors has not only been observed in 1. Pressure loss during sampling disturbs the phase equilibrium
this particular case, but similar observations concerning deviations which results in a (significant) loss of accuracy of the measured
have been found for other systems in the literature, e.g. by Peper data points (essential for AnT). This disturbance can be avoided
et al. [161]. e.g. by pressure compensation or by sampling of only small vol-
It is astonishing why the real accuracy of published experimen- umes from a large equilibrium cell.
tal data is much lower than the accuracy given by the authors. Often 2. Samples must be representative of the studied phases. Besides
this can be explained by the fact that less experienced personnel the disturbance of the equilibrium state in the cell the pressure
has overlooked sources of errors of the experimental procedure and reduction changes the sample itself (phase split). Therefore, it
deficiencies of the apparatus. has to be ensured that the sample will be completely withdrawn
Experimental difficulties and errors are rarely published, though from the equilibrium cell and the sampling system, respectively
they are an important part of the know-how for measuring high- (AnT, AnPT).
quality data. This knowledge can be developed and maintained 3. Special care must be taken in order to avoid adsorption inside
within the research group, if a certain level of ongoing experimen- transfer lines, samplers, columns, etc. This is even more impor-
tal activity exists. A survey of the European Federation of Chemical tant when working in the trace region of many compounds, like
Engineering on industrial needs for thermodynamics and transport water, hydrogen sulfide, methanol, etc. (AnT, AnPT).
properties [162] showed that there is a clear need for qualified 4. Concerning the analysis of the samples, it is very important to
laboratories with experienced staff to provide experimental mea- carefully calibrate all instruments used and to give calibration
surements. results (AnT, AnPT).
J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69 61
5. Pressure induced changes of measuring signal, e.g. absorption To provide the reader with information on articles with cor-
units (AnSpec) or buoyancy (AnGrav) have to be considered. rections and discussions on published experimental high-pressure
6. For the determination of phase changes it must be taken into data, we prepared a compilation (Table 57). We give the original
account that the change of the volume will lead to a change articles and the articles with corrigenda, comments, rebuttals to
of the temperature, e.g. due to compression work (SynVis, comments or publisher’s notes, when at least one of them falls in
SynNon). the period of the review. Most of the corrigenda are concerning
minor corrections, but they can be very substantial, e.g. Han et al.
[827] corrected a substance investigated that was originally given
4. Systems investigated repeatedly wrong in the title, the abstract and the text of the article.
Work on the continuation of the review series is under way,
Almost 800 articles with experimental data on high pres- covering the period between 2009 and 2011, and will be published
sure phase equilibria were found [163–818]. More than 2400 in 2012. We are also working on a supplemental edition of this
systems have been investigated, from pure-components, binary review series, containing data that have not been included in one
systems up to complex mixtures with many components. In of the earlier reviews, e.g. because they were published in journals
Tables 3–56, the following information about the systems inves- that are not or were not yet searched systematically, or because
tigated is given: the reference, the temperature and pressure they were overlooked. We appreciate suggestions by the authors.
range of the data and the experimental method used for the The supplemental edition will be published in 2013.
measurements.
Because the size of the equilibrium cell can be of importance, References
e.g. for the pressure drop during sampling or for the amount of
substances needed, the volume of the equilibrium cell is also given [1] G. Brunner, Supercritical Fluids as Solvents and Reaction Media, Elsevier Sci-
in the tables. As mentioned above, the largest cell of the review ence, Amsterdam, 2004.
[2] D.E. Knox, Pure Appl. Chem. 77 (2005) 513–530.
period had a volume of 40 000 cm3 (AnT [28]) and the smallest [3] G. Brunner, Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 1 (2010) 321–342.
0.03 cm3 (SynVis [103]). The average internal volume of all cells [4] E. Kiran, G. Brunner, R.L. Smith Jr., J. Supercrit. Fluids 47 (2009) 333–335.
for systems measured with analytical methods is 278 cm3 , with [5] E. Schütz, Chem. Eng. Technol. 30 (2007) 685–688.
[6] R. Dohrn, S. Peper, J.M.S. Fonseca, Fluid Phase Equilib. 288 (2010) 1–54.
synthetic methods 86 cm3 , and the overall average is 163 cm3 . [7] D. Richon, Pure Appl. Chem. 81 (2009) 1769–1782.
It is understandable, that cells for synthetic methods are usually [8] R.L. Smith Jr., Z. Fang, J. Supercrit. Fluids 47 (2009) 431–446.
smaller, since no sampling is necessary. But also for synthetic meth- [9] S. Keskin, D. Kayrak-Talay, U. Akman, Í. Hortasu, J. Supercrit. Fluids 43 (2007)
150–180.
ods a larger volume can be advantageous. When Fourie et al. [819]
[10] K.N. Marsh, C.L. Young, D.W. Morton, D. Ambrose, C. Tsonopoulos, J. Chem.
built a new a variable-volume high-pressure phase equilibrium cell, Eng. Data 51 (2006) 305–314.
they increased the internal volume from 40 cm3 (old cell) to 80 cm3 [11] K.N. Marsh, A. Abramson, D. Ambrose, D.W. Morton, E. Nikitin, C. Tsonopoulos,
(new cell). The larger volume allows for increased accuracy of the C.L. Young, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1509–1538.
[12] Ö. Gücli-Üstündag, F. Temelli, J. Supercrit. Fluids 36 (2005) 1–15.
composition, especially in the high solvent mass fraction region [13] Ö. Gücli-Üstündag, F. Temelli, J. Supercrit. Fluids 38 (2006) 275–288.
(>95%). [14] C.S. Su, Y.P. Chen, Fluid Phase Equilib. 254 (2007) 167–173.
Information on 206 pure-components is given in Table 3. [15] S. Sawamura, Pure Appl. Chem. 79 (2007) 861–874.
[16] J.S. Loveday, R.S. Nelmes, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10 (2008) 937–950.
Most of experimental phase equilibrium data were on binary sys- [17] C.E. Schwarz, I. Nieuwoudt, J.H. Knoetze, J. Supercrit. Fluids 46 (2008)
tems: 1469 systems investigated have been divided into 28 tables 226–232.
(Tables 4–31), with Table 4 (carbon dioxide + X) containing 796 [18] I.M. Abdulagatov, N.G. Polikhronidi, A.A. Abdurashidova, S.B. Kiselev, J.F. Ely,
Int. J. Thermophys. 26 (2005) 1327–1368.
binary systems being by far the largest one. Many data have been [19] T. Loerting, C.G. Salzmann, K. Winkel, E. Mayer, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8
measured for binary systems containing water, propane, nitrogen, (2006) 2810–2818.
methane, and 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a). Information [20] H. Knapp, R. Döring, L. Oellrich, U. Plöcker, J.M. Prausnitz, Vapor–Liquid Equi-
libria for Mixtures of Low-Boiling Substances, DECHEMA Chem. Data Series
on the tables and their order can be found in the list of tables.
VI, Dechema, Frankfurt, 1981.
The additional components X are listed in alphabetic sequence. [21] R.E. Fornari, P. Alessi, I. Kikic, Fluid Phase Equilib. 57 (1990) 1–33.
The results of 535 ternary systems are given in 17 tables [22] R. Dohrn, G. Brunner, Fluid Phase Equilib. 106 (1995) 213–282.
[23] M. Christov, R. Dohrn, Fluid Phase Equilib. 202 (2002) 153–218.
(Tables 32–48), e.g. 63 ternary systems of the type carbon diox-
[24] International Organization of Standardization, ISO 4 Rules for the abbrevia-
ide + water + X. The order of the tables is analog to the order of the tion of title words and titles of publication, Geneva, Switzerland, 1997.
binary systems. Information on 120 multicomponent systems (four [25] P. Naidoo, D. Ramjugernath, J.D. Raal, Fluid Phase Equilib. 269 (2008) 104–112.
to ten components) is listed in Tables 49–52. Results for 41 complex [26] R. Dohrn, A.P. Bünz, F. Devlieghere, D. Thelen, Fluid Phase Equilib. 83 (1993)
149–158.
systems with many components, like gas condensate reservoirs, are [27] L. Ruffine, A. Barreau, I. Brunella, P. Mougin, J. Jose, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44
listed in Table 53. (2005) 8387–8392.
Special tables have been generated for systems containing [28] M. van Der Kraan, M.V. Fernandez Cid, G.F. Woerlee, W.J.T. Veugelers, G.-J.
Witkamp, Text. Res. J. 77 (2007) 550–558.
hydrates (Tables 54–56). Overall, 207 systems with hydrates were [29] P. Guilbot, A. Valtz, H. Legendre, D. Richon, Analusis 28 (2000) 426–431.
found. [30] D. Seredynska, G. Ullrich, G. Wiegand, N. Dahmen, E. Dinjus, J. Chem. Eng. Data
As compared to our earlier review [6] covering the period 52 (2007) 2284–2287.
[31] M. Khajeh, Y. Yamini, R. Miri, B. Hemmateenejad, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005)
2000–2004, the distribution of the systems investigated con- 344–347.
cerning the number of components stayed remarkably constant: [32] M. Hojjati, Y. Yamini, M. Khajeh, A. Vatanara, J. Supercrit. Fluids 41 (2007)
60.0% binary systems (59.3% in 2000–2004), 21.8% ternary sys- 187–194.
[33] C. Secuianu, V. Feroiu, D. Geana, Fluid Phase Equilib. 270 (2008) 109–115.
tems (21.9%), 6.7% multicomponent and complex systems (6.9%)
[34] G. Koglbauer, M. Wendland, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1672–1677.
and 11.5% pure-component systems (11.9%). [35] G. Li, H. Li, L.S. Turng, S. Gong, C. Zhang, Fluid Phase Equilib. 246 (2006)
In general, the data given in the tables are new data that have 158–166.
[36] Y. Hussain, Y.T. Wu, P.J. Ampaw, C.S. Grant, J. Supercrit. Fluids 42 (2007)
not been published previously. There are very few exceptions, e.g.
255–264.
the partition coefficients of C. I. Disperse Blue 79 between a CO2 - [37] G. Brunner, J. Teich, R. Dohrn, Fluid Phase Equilib. 100 (1994) 253–268.
rich phase and a polymeric phase (poly(ethylene) terephthalate) [38] L.A. Galicia-Luna, A. Ortega-Rodriguez, D. Richon, J. Chem. Eng. Data 45 (2000)
were published by Ferri et al. [820] in The Journal of Supercritical 265–271.
[39] V. Margon, U.S. Agarwal, C.J. Peters, G. de Wit, C. Bailly, J.M.N. van Kasteren,
Fluids and by the same authors (Banchero et al. [64]) in the Textile P.J. Lemstra, J. Supercrit. Fluids 34 (2005) 309–321.
Research Journal. [40] R. Kato, H. Nishiumi, Fluid Phase Equilib. 249 (2006) 140–146.
62 J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69
[41] Q.N. Ho, K.S. Yoo, B.G. Lee, J.S. Lim, Fluid Phase Equilib. 245 (2006) 63–70. [94] M. Calderone, E. Rodier, J.J. Letourneau, J. Fages, J. Supercrit. Fluids 42 (2007)
[42] J. Freitag, D. Tuma, G. Maurer, J. Supercrit. Fluids 41 (2007) 227–237. 189–199.
[43] D. Missopolinou, I. Tsivintzelis, C.G. Panayiotou, Fluid Phase Equilib. 238 [95] R. Dohrn, E. Bertakis, O. Behrend, E. Voutsas, D. Tassios, J. Mol. Liq. 131–132
(2005) 204–209. (2007) 53–59.
[44] Y. Iwai, M. Ichimoto, S. Takada, S. Okuda, Y. Arai, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) [96] A. Martin, M. Kant, H. Klein, R. Jackstell, M. Beller, J. Supercrit. Fluids 42 (2007)
1844–1847. 325–329.
[45] J. Luo, Y. Yuan, M. Liu, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1688–1690. [97] J.G. Beltrán, P. Servio, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1745–1749.
[46] G. Sherman, S. Shenoy, R.A. Weiss, C. Erkey, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39 (2000) [98] T. Akutsu, Y. Yamaji, H. Yamaguchi, M. Watanabe, R.L. Smith Jr., H. Inomata,
846–848. Fluid Phase Equilib. 257 (2007) 163–168.
[47] Z.-T. Liu, J. Wu, L. Liu, C. Sun, L. Song, Z. Gao, W. Dong, J. Lu, J. Chem. Eng. Data [99] H.S. Byun, K.P. Yoo, J. Supercrit. Fluids 41 (2007) 472–481.
51 (2006) 1761–1768. [100] M. Haruki, Y. Takakura, H. Sugiura, S.i. Kihara, S. Takishima, J. Supercrit. Fluids
[48] G. Filardo, M.D. Blasi, A. Galia, A. Ponchel, H. Bricout, A.D. Sayede, E. Monflier, 44 (2008) 284–293.
J. Supercrit. Fluids 36 (2006) 173–181. [101] M. Koh, J. Yoo, M. Ju, B. Joo, K. Park, H. Kim, H. Kim, B. Fournel, Ind. Eng. Chem.
[49] A.R. Duarte, C. Martins, P. Coimbra, M.H.M. Gil, H.C. de Sousa, C.M.M. Duarte, Res. 47 (2008) 278–283.
J. Supercrit. Fluids 38 (2006) 392–398. [102] Z. Knez, M. Skerget, A.P. Uzunalic, J. Supercrit. Fluids 43 (2007) 237–248.
[50] N. Faridi, D.B. Todd, J. Cell. Plast. 43 (2007) 345–356. [103] M. Milhet, J. Pauly, J.A.P. Coutinho, M. Dirand, J.L. Daridon, Fluid Phase Equilib.
[51] R.M. Ruivo, R.M. Couto, P.C. Simoes, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 566–570. 235 (2005) 173–181.
[52] Y. Shimoyama, Y. Iwai, T. Abeta, Y. Arai, Fluid Phase Equilib. 264 (2008) [104] J. Gregorowicz, Fluid Phase Equilib. 240 (2006) 29–39.
228–234. [105] M.D. Bermejo, M. Montero, E. Saez, L.J. Florusse, A.J. Kotlewska, M.J. Cocero, F.
[53] T. Fang, Wahyudiono, B. Al-Duri, Y. Shimoyama, Y. Iwai, M. Sasaki, M. Goto, van Rantwijk, C.J. Peters, J. Phys. Chem. B 112 (2008) 13532–13541.
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 5325–5332. [106] L. Hong, E. Fidler, R.M. Enick, R. Marentis, J. Supercrit. Fluids 44 (2008) 1–7.
[54] C.B. Kautz, G.M. Schneider, J.J. Shim, B. Wagner, D. Tuma, J. Chem. Eng. Data [107] T. Tsuji, T. Hiaki, N. Itoh, Fluid Phase Equilib. 261 (2007) 375–381.
53 (2008) 2356–2371. [108] I. AlNashef, R.S. Al-Ameeri, T.A. Al Sahhaf, S. Hamam, Korean J. Chem. Eng. 25
[55] P. Karásek, J. Planeta, M. Roth, J. Chromatogr. A 1140 (2007) 195–204. (2008) 1495–1498.
[56] Z. Huang, M. Feng, Y. Guo, J. Su, L. Teng, T. Liu, Y.C. Chiew, Fluid Phase Equilib. [109] P. Losada-Pérez, M. Blesic, G. Pérez-Sánchez, C.A. Cerdeirina, J. Troncoso, L.
272 (2008) 8–17. Romani, J. Szydlowski, L.P.N. Rebelo, Fluid Phase Equilib. 258 (2007) 7–15.
[57] B.M. Hybertson, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 235–238. [110] M.J. Pratas de Melo, A.M.A. Dias, M. Blesic, L.P.N. Rebelo, L.F. Vega, J.A.P.
[58] H. Sovová, R.P. Stateva, A.A. Galushko, J. Supercrit. Fluids 41 (2007) 1–9. Coutinho, I.M. Marrucho, Fluid Phase Equilib. 242 (2006) 210–219.
[59] M. Banchero, A. Ferri, L. Manna, S. Sicardi, Fluid Phase Equilib. 243 (2006) [111] G. Masui, Y. Honda, M. Uematsu, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 38 (2006) 1711–1716.
107–114. [112] S. Hashimoto, S. Murayama, T. Sugahara, H. Sato, K. Ohgaki, Chem. Eng. Sci.
[60] P. Alessi, I. Kikic, A. Cortesi, A. Fogar, M. Moneghini, J. Supercrit. Fluids 27 61 (2006) 7884–7888.
(2003) 309–315. [113] V.P. Melnikov, A.N. Nesterov, A.M. Reshetnikov, Dokl. Phys. Chem. 417 (2007)
[61] W.L. Weng, J.T. Chen, J.W. Yang, J.S. Chang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 304–307.
511–516. [114] M. Choudhary, Y. Delaviz, R. Loh, M. Polasky, C. Wan, D.B. Todd, K.S. Hyun, S.
[62] J.Z. Yin, C.S. Tan, Fluid Phase Equilib. 242 (2006) 111–117. Dey, F. Wu, J. Cell. Plast. 41 (2005) 589–599.
[63] A.S. Özcan, A. Özcan, J. Supercrit. Fluids 37 (2006) 23–28. [115] L. Gil, S.F. Otín, J.M. Embid, M.A.n. Gallardo, S. Blanco, M. Artal, I. Velasco, J.
[64] M. Banchero, S. Sicardi, A. Ferri, L. Manna, Text. Res. J. 78 (2008) 217– Supercrit. Fluids 44 (2008) 123–138.
223. [116] C.R. Haramagatti, A. Islamov, H. Gibhardt, N. Gorski, A. Kuklin, G. Eckold, Phys.
[65] G.K. Folas, E.W. Froyna, J. Lovland, G.M. Kontogeorgis, E. Solbraa, Fluid Phase Chem. Chem. Phys. 8 (2006) 994–1000.
Equilib. 252 (2007) 162–174. [117] M.E. Kandil, K.N. Marsh, A.R.H. Goodwin, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 37 (2005)
[66] M. Roth, J. Chromatogr. A 1037 (2004) 369–391. 684–691.
[67] C.Y. Kong, N.R.W. Withanage, T. Funazukuri, S. Kagei, J. Supercrit. Fluids 37 [118] T.T. Ngo, D. Bush, C.A. Eckert, C.L. Liotta, AICHE J. 47 (2001) 2566–2572.
(2006) 63–71. [119] R. Gomes de Azevedo, J.M.S.S. Esperanca, V. Najdanovic-Visak, Z.P. Visak, H.J.R.
[68] D. Suleiman, L.A. Estévez, J.C. Pulido, J.E. Garcia, C. Mojica, J. Chem. Eng. Data Guedes, M.N. Nunes da Ponte, L.P.N. Rebelo, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005)
50 (2005) 1234–1241. 997–1008.
[69] H. Machida, Y. Sato, R.L. Smith Jr., J. Supercrit. Fluids 43 (2008) 430–437. [120] J.M.S.S. Esperança, P.F. Pires, H.J.R. Guedes, N. Ribeiro, T. Costa, A.I. Aguiar-
[70] A.H. Haines, D.C. Steytler, C. Rivett, J. Supercrit. Fluids 44 (2008) 21–24. Ricardo, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 2161–2169.
[71] I. Pasquali, J.M. Andanson, S.G. Kazarian, R. Bettini, J. Supercrit. Fluids 45 [121] D. Kodama, T. Seki, M. Kato, Fluid Phase Equilib. 261 (2007) 99–103.
(2008) 384–390. [122] M. Stievano, N. Elvassore, J. Supercrit. Fluids 33 (2005) 7–14.
[72] A.J. Rondinone, C.Y. Jones, S.L. Marshall, B.C. Chakoumakos, C.J. Rawn, E. Lara- [123] S. Spilimbergo, G. Luca, N. Elvassore, A. Bertucco, J. Supercrit. Fluids 38 (2006)
Curzio, Can. J. Phys. 81 (2003) 381–385. 289–294.
[73] G. Li, S.N. Leung, M.M. Hasan, J. Wang, C.B. Park, R. Simha, Fluid Phase Equilib. [124] Y. Maeda, T. Niori, J. Yamamoto, H. Yokoyama, Thermochim. Acta 428 (2005)
266 (2008) 129–142. 57–62.
[74] J.L. Anthony, J.L. Anderson, E.J. Maginn, J.F. Brennecke, J. Phys. Chem. B 109 [125] V. Kutcherov, A. Chernoutsan, Int. J. Thermophys. 27 (2006) 474–485.
(2005) 6366–6374. [126] A. Chapoy, R. Anderson, H. Haghighi, T. Edwards, B. Tohidi, Ind. Eng. Chem.
[75] A. Blasig, J. Tang, X. Hu, Y. Shen, M. Radosz, Fluid Phase Equilib. 256 (2007) Res. 47 (2008) 1689–1694.
75–80. [127] L.J. Rovetto, T.A. Strobel, C.A. Koh, E.D. Sloan Jr., Fluid Phase Equilib. 247 (2006)
[76] R. Kleinrahm, W. Wagner, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 18 (1986) 739–760. 84–89.
[77] E. Aionicesei, M. Skerget, Z. Knez, J. Supercrit. Fluids 47 (2008) 296–301. [128] S.P. Kang, J.W. Lee, H.J. Ryu, Fluid Phase Equilib. 274 (2008) 68–72.
[78] G. Li, F. Gunkel, J. Wang, C.B. Park, V. Altstädt, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 103 (2007) [129] S.C. Ayirala, D.N. Rao, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 85 (2007) 302–312.
2945–2953. [130] E.D. Nikitin, A.P. Popov, Y.G. Yatluk, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 315–317.
[79] M. Petermann, T. Weissert, S. Kareth, H.W. Lösch, F. Dreisbach, J. Supercrit. [131] D.M. VonNiederhausern, G.M. Wilson, N.F. Giles, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006)
Fluids 45 (2008) 156–160. 1982–1985.
[80] N. von Solms, N. Zecchin, A. Rubin, S.I. Andersen, E.H. Stenby, Eur. Polym. J. 41 [132] M.V. Avdeev, A.N. Konovalov, V. Bagratashvili, V.K. Popov, S.I. Tsypina, M.
(2005) 341–348. Sokolova, J. Ke, M. Poliakoff, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6 (2004) 1258–1263.
[81] M.B. Shiflett, A. Yokozeki, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005) 4453–4464. [133] W. Wu, J. Ke, M. Poliakoff, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1398–1403.
[82] A.N. Soriano, J. Doma, M.H. Li, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 40 (2008) 1654–1660. [134] D. Manara, R. Pflieger, M. Sheindlin, Int. J. Thermophys. 26 (2005) 1193–1206.
[83] Z. Lei, H. Ohyabu, Y. Sato, H. Inomata, R.L. Smith Jr., J. Supercrit. Fluids 40 [135] V.L. Solozhenko, Y.L. Godec, S. Klotz, M. Mezouar, V.Z. Turkevich, J.M. Besson,
(2007) 452–461. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4 (2002) 5386–5393.
[84] M.J. Muldoon, S.N.V.K. Aki, J.L. Anderson, J.K. Dixon, J.F. Brennecke, J. Phys. [136] S. Randzio, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 89 (2007) 51–59.
Chem. B 111 (2007) 9001–9009. [137] S.L. Randzio, M. Orlowska, Biomacromolecules 6 (2005) 3045–3050.
[85] M. Pantoula, J. von Schnitzler, R. Eggers, C.G. Panayiotou, J. Supercrit. Fluids [138] J.J.B. Machado, T.W. de Loos, E. Christian Ihmels, K. Fischer, J. Gmehling, J.
39 (2007) 426–434. Chem. Thermodyn. 40 (2008) 1632–1637.
[86] M. Pantoula, C.G. Panayiotou, J. Supercrit. Fluids 37 (2006) 254–262. [139] J. Ke, P.J. King, M.W. George, M. Poliakoff, Anal. Chem. 77 (2005) 85–92.
[87] M.D.A. Saldana, L. Sun, S.E. Guigard, F. Temelli, J. Supercrit. Fluids 37 (2006) [140] J. Ke, K.E. Reid, M. Poliakoff, J. Supercrit. Fluids 40 (2007) 27–39.
342–349. [141] W. Ren, A.M. Scurto, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78 (2007) 125104–125107.
[88] F. Giraudeau, D.H. Lister, D.R. Morris, U. Setthanan, F.R. Steward, L.T. Yang, [142] R. Dohrn, O. Pfohl, Fluid Phase Equilib. 194–197 (2002) 15–29.
Can. J. Chem. Eng. 86 (2008) 1032–1038. [143] O. Pfohl, R. Dohrn, Fluid Phase Equilib. 217 (2004) 189–199.
[89] A.P. Abbott, W. Eltringham, E.G. Hope, M. Nicola, Green Chem. 7 (2005) [144] O. Pfohl, C. Riebesell, R. Dohrn, Fluid Phase Equilib. 202 (2002) 289–306.
210–216. [145] D. Liu, D.L. Tomasko, J. Supercrit. Fluids 39 (2007) 416–425.
[90] M. Muntó, N. Ventosa, S. Sala, J. Veciana, J. Supercrit. Fluids 47 (2008) 147– [146] M.S. Shaharun, H. Mukhtar, B.K. Dutta, Chem. Eng. Sci. 63 (2008) 3024–3035.
153. [147] Y.S. Kim, W.Y. Choi, J.H. Jang, K.P. Yoo, C.S. Lee, Fluid Phase Equilib. 228–229
[91] M. Muntó, N. Ventosa, J. Veciana, J. Supercrit. Fluids 47 (2008) 290–295. (2005) 439–445.
[92] V.L. Solozhenko, O.O. Kurakevych, V.Z. Turkevich, D.V. Turkevich, J. Phys. [148] M.S. Gruszkiewicz, J.M. Simonson, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 37 (2005) 906–930.
Chem. B 112 (2008) 6683–6687. [149] A.M. Anderson, T.B. Roth, M.R. Ernst, M.K. Carroll, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008)
[93] C. Dilek, C.W. Manke, E. Gulari, J. Supercrit. Fluids 43 (2008) 421–429. 1015–1020.
J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69 63
[150] K. Ogata, S. Hashimoto, T. Sugahara, M. Moritoki, H. Sato, K. Ohgaki, Chem. [201] H.S. Byun, D.H. Lee, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 3373–3380.
Eng. Sci. 63 (2008) 5714–5718. [202] H.S. Byun, D.H. Lee, J.S. Lim, K.P. Yoo, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006)
[151] V.S. Efimchenko, V.E. Antonov, O.I. Barkalov, S.N. Klyamkin, J. Phys. Chem. B 3366–3372.
112 (2008) 7026–7031. [203] H.S. Byun, D.H. Lee, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 3354–3365.
[152] K.M. Krüger, O. Pfohl, R. Dohrn, G. Sadowski, Fluid Phase Equilib. 241 (2006) [204] H.S. Byun, H.Y. Lee, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1436–1440.
138–146. [205] H.S. Byun, K.P. Yoo, Fluid Phase Equilib. 249 (2006) 55–60.
[153] M.B. Ewing, J.C.S. Ochoa, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1543–1547. [206] H.S. Byun, M.A. McHugh, J. Supercrit. Fluids 41 (2007) 482–491.
[154] M.B. Ewing, J.C.S. Ochoa, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 38 (2006) 283–288. [207] H.S. Byun, M.Y. Choi, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 39 (2007) 855–861.
[155] N.G. Polikhronidi, R. Batyrova, I.M. Abdulagatov, G.V. Stepanov, Int. J. Ther- [208] L. Calvo, T.W. de Loos, Fluid Phase Equilib. 244 (2006) 179–187.
mophys. 27 (2006) 729–759. [209] L.E. Camacho-Camacho, L.A. Galicia-Luna, O. Elizalde-Solis, Z. Martinez-
[156] H. Matsuda, E. Machida, Y. Yamanaka, K. Kurihara, K. Ochi, J. Chem. Eng. Data Ramirez, Fluid Phase Equilib. 259 (2007) 45–50.
53 (2008) 1612–1617. [210] R.N. Carvalho, M.L. Corazza, L. Cardozo-Filho, M.A. Meireles, J. Chem. Eng. Data
[157] M.B. Shiflett, A. Yokozeki, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 14436–14443. 51 (2006) 997–1000.
[158] A.R. Bazaev, I.M. Abdulagatov, E.A. Bazaev, A.A. Abdurashidova, A.E. [211] O.J. Catchpole, S.J. Tallon, P.J. Dyer, J.S. Lan, B. Jensen, O.K. Rasmussen, J.B. Grey,
Ramazanova, J. Supercrit. Fluids 41 (2007) 217–226. Fluid Phase Equilib. 237 (2005) 212–218.
[159] C.-H. Cheng, Y.P. Chen, Fluid Phase Equilib. 234 (2005) 77–83. [212] A. Chafer, T. Fornari, A. Berna, E. Ibanez, G. Reglero, J. Supercrit. Fluids 34
[160] D. Kodama, K. Sugiyama, T. Ono, M. Kato, J. Supercrit. Fluids 47 (2008) (2005) 323–329.
128–134. [213] A. Chafer, T. Fornari, R.P. Stateva, A. Berna, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006)
[161] S. Peper, V. Haverkamp, R. Dohrn, J. Supercrit. Fluids (2010). 612–615.
[162] E. Hendriks, G. Kontogeorgis, R. Dohrn, J.-C. de Hemptinne, I.G. Economou, L. [214] A. Chafer, T. Fornari, R.P. Stateva, A. Berna, J. Garcia-Reverter, J. Chem. Eng.
Fele Žilnik, V. Vesovic, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. (2010). Data 52 (2007) 116–121.
[163] M.A. Abdi, A. Hussain, K. Hawboldt, E. Beronich, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) [215] C.J. Chang, M.s. Lee, B.c. Li, P.y. Chen, Fluid Phase Equilib. 233 (2005) 56–65.
1741–1746. [216] A. Chapoy, C. Coquelet, D. Richon, Fluid Phase Equilib. 230 (2005) 210–214.
[164] C.D. Ablan, D. Sheppard, E.J. Beckman, M.M. Olmstead, P.G. Jessop, Green [217] A. Chapoy, A.H. Mohammadi, B. Tohidi, D. Richon, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005)
Chem. 7 (2005) 590–594. 1157–1161.
[165] W. Afzal, A.H. Mohammadi, D. Richon, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) [218] S.K. Chaudhari, D. Salavera, X. Esteve, A. Coronas, Fluid Phase Equilib. 271
2053–2055. (2008) 28–33.
[166] W. Afzal, A.H. Mohammadi, D. Richon, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 663–666. [219] J.X. Chen, Z.S. Chen, P. Hu, B. Jiang, Z.H. Li, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007)
[167] A.I. Aguiar-Ricardo, T. Casimiro, T. Costa, J. Leandro, N. Ribeiro, Fluid Phase 2159–2162.
Equilib. 239 (2006) 26–29. [220] Q. Chen, R.H. Hong, G. Chen, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1586–1588.
[168] E. Aionicesei, M. Skerget, Z. Knez, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 185–188. [221] Y. Chen, S. Zhang, X. Yuan, Y. Zhang, X. Zhang, W. Dai, R. Mori, Thermochim.
[169] R. Akasaka, Y. Higashi, K. Tanaka, Y. Kayukawa, K. Fujii, Fluid Phase Equilib. Acta 441 (2006) 42–44.
261 (2007) 286–291. [222] C.-H. Cheng, M. Tang, Y.P. Chen, Fluid Phase Equilib. 248 (2006) 89–95.
[170] T.A. Andersson, K.M. Hartonen, M.L. Riekkola, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) [223] C.-H. Cheng, Y.P. Chen, Fluid Phase Equilib. 242 (2006) 169–175.
1177–1183. [224] H.Y. Chiu, R.F. Jung, M.J. Lee, H.M. Lin, J. Supercrit. Fluids 44 (2008) 273–278.
[171] P. Andre, P. Lacroix-Desmazes, D.K. Taylor, B. Boutevin, J. Supercrit. Fluids 37 [225] H.Y. Chiu, M.J. Lee, H.M. Lin, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2393–2402.
(2006) 263–270. [226] P. Coimbra, M.H.M. Gil, C.M.M. Duarte, B.M. Heron, H.C. de Sousa, Fluid Phase
[172] A.E. Andreatta, S.B. Bottini, L.J. Florusse, C.J. Peters, J. Supercrit. Fluids 38 (2006) Equilib. 238 (2005) 120–128.
306–311. [227] P. Coimbra, M.R. Blanco, H.S.R. Costa Silva, M.H.M. Gil, H.C. de Sousa, J. Chem.
[173] A.E. Andreatta, L.J. Florusse, S.B. Bottini, C.J. Peters, J. Supercrit. Fluids 42 (2007) Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1097–1104.
60–68. [228] P. Coimbra, D. Fernandes, P. Ferreira, M.H.M. Gil, H.C. de Sousa, J. Supercrit.
[174] H. Arcis, L. Rodier, J.Y. Coxam, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 39 (2007) 878–887. Fluids 45 (2008) 272–281.
[175] H. Arcis, L. Rodier, K. Ballerat-Busserolles, J.Y. Coxam, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 40 [229] P. Coimbra, D. Fernandes, M.H.M. Gil, H.ü.C. Sousa, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008)
(2008) 1022–1029. 1990–1995.
[176] M. Arjmandi, A. Chapoy, B. Tohidi, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 2153–2158. [230] C. Coquelet, A. Valtz, D. Richon, Fluid Phase Equilib. 232 (2005) 44–49.
[177] O. Aschenbrenner, S. Kemper, N. Dahmen, K. Schaber, E. Dinjus, J. Supercrit. [231] C. Coquelet, A. Valtz, D. Richon, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 40 (2008) 942–948.
Fluids 41 (2007) 179–186. [232] C. Coquelet, A. Valtz, F. Dieu, D. Richon, P. Arpentinier, F. Lockwood, Fluid
[178] Z. Atik, C. Windmeier, L.R. Oellrich, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1862–1867. Phase Equilib. 273 (2008) 38–43.
[179] Y. Bai, H.J. Yang, C. Quan, C.Y. Guo, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 2074–2076. [233] F. Corvaro, G. Di Nicola, F. Polonara, G. Santori, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006)
[180] V.G. Baidakov, A.M. Kaverin, V.N. Andbaeva, Fluid Phase Equilib. 270 (2008) 1469–1472.
116–120. [234] F. Corvaro, G. Di Nicola, M. Pacetti, R. Stryjek, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006)
[181] P. Bao, J. Dai, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 838–842. 169–175.
[182] Z.B. Bao, Z.J. Wei, B. Su, Q. Ren, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1731–1734. [235] M.C. Costa, M.A. Krähenbühl, A.J.A. Meirelles, J.L. Daridon, J. Pauly, J.A.P.
[183] A.R. Bazaev, I.M. Abdulagatov, E.A. Bazaev, A. Abdurashidova, Int. J. Thermo- Coutinho, Fluid Phase Equilib. 253 (2007) 118–123.
phys. 28 (2007) 194–219. [236] M. Costantini, V.A. Toussaint, A. Shariati, C.J. Peters, I. Kikic, J. Chem. Eng. Data
[184] A.R. Bazaev, I.M. Abdulagatov, E.A. Bazaev, A. Abdurashidova, J. Chem. Ther- 50 (2005) 52–55.
modyn. 39 (2007) 385–411. [237] C. Cravo, A.R. Duarte, C.M.M. Duarte, J. Supercrit. Fluids 40 (2007) 194–199.
[185] A.R. Bazaev, I.M. Abdulagatov, E.A. Bazaev, A. Abdurashidova, J. Chem. Ther- [238] X. Cui, G. Chen, X.H. Han, C.S. Li, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1927–1930.
modyn. 40 (2008) 334. [239] X. Cui, G. Chen, X.H. Han, Q. Wang, Fluid Phase Equilib. 245 (2006) 155–
[186] T.L. Benazzi, E. Franceschi, M.L. Corazza, J.V. Oliveira, C. Dariva, Fluid Phase 157.
Equilib. 244 (2006) 128–136. [240] X. Cui, G. Chen, C.S. Li, X. Han, Fluid Phase Equilib. 249 (2006) 97–103.
[187] M.D. Bermejo, A. Martín, L.J. Florusse, C.J. Peters, M.J. Cocero, Fluid Phase [241] N. Dahmen, P. Griesheimer, P. Makarczyk, S. Pitter, O. Walter, J. Organomet.
Equilib. 238 (2005) 220–228. Chem. 690 (2005) 1467–1473.
[188] M.D. Bermejo, A. Martín, L.J. Florusse, C.J. Peters, M.J. Cocero, Fluid Phase [242] F. Dan, J.P. Grolier, Thermochim. Acta 446 (2006) 73–83.
Equilib. 244 (2006) 78–85. [243] R. Davarnejad, K.M. Kassim, A. Zainal, S.A. Sata, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008)
[189] E. Bertakis, I. Lemonis, S. Katsoufis, E. Voutsas, R. Dohrn, K. Magoulas, D. 2128–2132.
Tassios, J. Supercrit. Fluids 41 (2007) 238–245. [244] J.C.B. de la Fuente, J.O. Valderrama, S.B. Bottini, J.M. del Valle, J. Supercrit.
[190] A. Blasig, J. Tang, X. Hu, S.P. Tan, Y. Shen, M. Radosz, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 Fluids 34 (2005) 195–201.
(2007) 5542–5547. [245] J.C.B. de la Fuente, N. Quezada, J.M. del Valle, Fluid Phase Equilib. 235 (2005)
[191] S. Bobbo, L. Fedele, M. Scattolini, R. Camporese, R. Stryjek, Fluid Phase Equilib. 196–200.
256 (2007) 81–85. [246] J.C.B. de la Fuente, S.B. Bottini, C.J. Peters, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 2–6.
[192] S. Bobbo, F. Pernechele, L. Fedele, R. Stryjek, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) [247] J.C.B. de la Fuente, B. Oyarzún, N. Quezada, J.M. del Valle, Fluid Phase Equilib.
2581–2585. 247 (2006) 90–95.
[193] R. Bogel-Lukasik, N.M.T. Lourenco, P. Vidinha, M.D.R.G. da Silva, C.A.M. Afonso, [248] J.C.B. de la Fuente, G. Núnez, J.M. del Valle, Fluid Phase Equilib. 259 (2007)
M.N. Nunes da Ponte, S.F. Barreiros, Green Chem. 10 (2008) 243–248. 77–82.
[194] R. Bogel-Lukasik, V. Najdanovic-Visak, S.F. Barreiros, M.N. Nunes da Ponte, [249] A. de Lucas, I. Gracia, J. Rincón, M.T. García, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007)
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 (2008) 4473–4480. 5061–5066.
[195] G.R. Borges, A. Junges, E. Franceschi, F.C. Corazza, M.L. Corazza, J.V. Oliveira, [250] A.R.S. de Sousa, M. Calderone, E. Rodier, J. Fages, C.M.M. Duarte, J. Supercrit.
C. Dariva, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1437–1441. Fluids 39 (2006) 13–19.
[196] A.R.E. Bras, T. Casimiro, J. Caldeira, A.I. Aguiar-Ricardo, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 [251] A.T. de Souza, T.L. Benazzi, M.B. Grings, V.F. Cabral, E.A. da Silva, L. Cardozo-
(2005) 1857–1860. Filho, O.A. Ceva Antunes, J. Supercrit. Fluids 47 (2008) 182–187.
[197] E. Brunner, M.C. Thies, G.M. Schneider, J. Supercrit. Fluids 39 (2006) 160– [252] U.K. Deiters, S.L. Randzio, Fluid Phase Equilib. 260 (2007) 87–97.
173. [253] A. Delahaye, L. Fournaison, S. Marinhas, I. Chatti, J.P. Petitet, D. Dalmazzone,
[198] H. Bruusgaard, J.G. Beltrán, P. Servio, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2594–2597. W. Furst, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 391–397.
[199] H.S. Byun, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 385–389. [254] C. Dell’Era, A. Zaytseva, P. Uusi-Kyyny, J.P. Pokki, M. Pakkanen, J. Aittamaa,
[200] H.S. Byun, M.Y. Choi, J.S. Lim, J. Supercrit. Fluids 37 (2006) 323–332. Fluid Phase Equilib. 254 (2007) 49–59.
64 J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69
[255] C. Descamps, C. Coquelet, C. Bouallou, D. Richon, Thermochim. Acta 430 (2005) [304] J. Freitag, Y. Yokoyama, H. Kuramochi, K. Kawamoto, K. Nagahama, S. Kato,
1–7. Fluid Phase Equilib. 257 (2007) 201–206.
[256] G. Di Nicola, G. Giuliani, F. Polonara, R. Stryjek, Fluid Phase Equilib. 230 (2005) [305] A.P. Fröba, H. Kremer, A. Leipertz, F. Flohr, C. Meurer, Int. J. Thermophys. 28
81–89. (2007) 449–480.
[257] G. Di Nicola, G. Giuliani, F. Polonara, R. Stryjek, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) [306] D. Fu, X. Sun, J. Pu, S. Zhao, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 371–375.
656–660. [307] D. Fu, X. Sun, Y. Qiu, X. Jiang, S. Zhao, Fluid Phase Equilib. 251 (2007) 114–120.
[258] G. Di Nicola, F. Polonara, R. Ricci, R. Stryjek, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) [308] F. Garcia-Sanchez, G. Eliosa-Jiménez, G. Silva-Oliver, A. Godinez-Silva, J. Chem.
312–318. Thermodyn. 39 (2007) 893–905.
[259] G. Di Nicola, G. Giuliani, F. Polonara, R. Stryjek, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) [309] J. Garcia, M. Youbi-Idrissi, J. Bonjour, J. Fernández, J. Supercrit. Fluids 47 (2008)
2041–2044. 8–16.
[260] G. Di Nicola, F. Polonara, G. Santori, R. Stryjek, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) [310] C. Garlapati, G. Madras, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2637–2641.
1258–1261. [311] C. Garlapati, G. Madras, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2913–2917.
[261] S. Diankov, D. Barth, A. Vega-Gonzalez, I. Pentchev, P. Subra-Paternault, J. [312] J. Gaudette, P. Servio, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1449–1451.
Supercrit. Fluids 41 (2007) 164–172. [313] P. Gayet, C. Dicharry, G. Marion, A. Graciaa, J. Lachaise, A.N. Nesterov, Chem.
[262] A.M.A. Dias, H. Carrier, J.L. Daridon, J.C. Pamies, L.F. Vega, J.A.P. Coutinho, I.M. Eng. Sci. 60 (2005) 5751–5758.
Marrucho, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 2341–2350. [314] H.S. Ghaziaskar, A. Daneshfar, M. Rezayat, Fluid Phase Equilib. 238 (2005)
[263] C. Dilek, C.W. Manke, E. Gulari, Fluid Phase Equilib. 239 (2006) 172–177. 106–111.
[264] U. Domanska, P. Morawski, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 37 (2005) 1276–1287. [315] H.S. Ghaziaskar, M. Kaboudvand, J. Supercrit. Fluids 44 (2008) 148–154.
[265] U. Domanska, P. Morawski, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1073–1082. [316] N.F. Giles, G.M. Wilson, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1954–1962.
[266] U. Domanska, P. Morawski, R. Wierzbicki, Fluid Phase Equilib. 242 (2006) [317] N.F. Giles, G.M. Wilson, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1966–1972.
154–163. [318] S. Glos, R. Kleinrahm, W. Wagner, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 38 (2006) 209.
[267] U. Domanska, P. Morawski, M. Piekarska, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 40 (2008) [319] P.A. Gordon, M. Schiller, C.P. Chai Kao, S. Bair, D.G. Friend, Fluid Phase Equilib.
710–717. 260 (2007) 164–168.
[268] X. Dong, M. Gong, Y. Zhang, J. Wu, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2193–2196. [320] F. Gozalpour, A. Danesh, A.C. Todd, B. Tohidi, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005)
[269] L.C. Draucker, J.P. Hallett, D. Bush, C.A. Eckert, Fluid Phase Equilib. 241 (2006) 1814–1817.
20–24. [321] F. Gozalpour, A. Danesh, A.C. Todd, B. Tohidi, Fluid Phase Equilib. 233 (2005)
[270] A.R. Duarte, L.E. Anderson, C.M.M. Duarte, S.G. Kazarian, J. Supercrit. Fluids 36 144–150.
(2005) 160–165. [322] M. Görnert, G. Sadowski, J. Supercrit. Fluids 46 (2008) 218–225.
[271] A.R. Duarte, S. Santiago, H.C. de Sousa, C.M.M. Duarte, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 [323] D. Greaves, J. Boxall, J. Mulligan E.D.Jr., C.A. Sloan Koh, Chem. Eng. Sci. 63
(2005) 216–220. (2008) 4570–4579.
[272] A.R. Duarte, A. Shariati, L.J. Rovetto, C.J. Peters, J. Phys. Chem. B 112 (2008) [324] J. Gregorowicz, J. Supercrit. Fluids 43 (2007) 357–366.
1888–1889. [325] J. Gregorowicz, J. Supercrit. Fluids 46 (2008) 105–111.
[273] A. Dunbar, D.M. Omiatek, S.D. Thai, C.E. Kendrex, L.L. Grotzinger, W.J. Boyko, [326] M. Grigiante, P. Stringari, G. Scalabrin, E.C. Ihmels, K. Fischer, J. Gmehling, J.
R.D. Weinstein, D.W. Skaf, C.A. Bessel, G.M. Denison, J.M. DeSimone, Ind. Eng. Chem. Thermodyn. 40 (2008) 537–548.
Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 8779–8787. [327] J.P. Grolier, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 37 (2005) 1226–1238.
[274] N.E. Durling, O.J. Catchpole, S.J. Tallon, J.B. Grey, Fluid Phase Equilib. 252 (2007) [328] J.P. Grolier, F. Dan, Thermochim. Acta 450 (2006) 47–55.
103–113. [329] V. Gruzdev, R. Khairulin, S. Komarov, S. Stankus, Int. J. Thermophys. 29 (2008)
[275] J.A. Dzielawa, A.V. Rubas, C. Lubbers, D.C. Stepinski, A.M. Scurto, R.E. Bar- 546–556.
rans, M.L. Dietz, A.W. Herlinger, J.F. Brennecke, Sep. Sci. Technol. 43 (2008) [330] V. Gruzdev, S. Komarov, S. Stankus, Int. J. Thermophys. 29 (2008) 557–567.
2520–2536. [331] P. Guilbot, K. Fischer, A. Valtz, P. Théveneau, A. Baba-Ahmed, D. Richon, Fluid
[276] G. Eliosa-Jiménez, G. Silva-Oliver, F. Garcia-Sanchez, A. de Ita de la Torre, J. Phase Equilib. 260 (2007) 49–59.
Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 395–404. [332] K.I. Gutkowski, A. Shariati, C.J. Peters, J. Supercrit. Fluids 39 (2006) 187–191.
[277] O. Elizalde-Solis, L.A. Galicia-Luna, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005) 5757–5760. [333] F. Han, Y. Xue, Y. Tian, X. Zhao, L. Chen, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 36–39.
[278] O. Elizalde-Solis, L.A. Galicia-Luna, Fluid Phase Equilib. 230 (2005) 51–57. [334] X. Han, G. Chen, C.S. Li, X.G. Qiao, X. Cui, Q. Wang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006)
[279] O. Elizalde-Solis, L.A. Galicia-Luna, Fluid Phase Equilib. 236 (2005) 178–183. 1232–1235.
[280] O. Elizalde-Solis, L.A. Galicia-Luna, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 5404– [335] X. Han, G. Chen, X. Cui, Q. Wang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 2112–2116.
5410. [336] X. Han, G. Chen, X. Cui, Q. Wang, J. Chem. Eng. Data. 53 (2008) 1046.
[281] O. Elizalde-Solis, L.A. Galicia-Luna, L.E. Camacho-Camacho, Fluid Phase Equi- [337] A. Haneda, T. Seki, D. Kodama, M. Kato, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 268–271.
lib. 259 (2007) 23–32. [338] T. Hara, S. Hashimoto, T. Sugahara, K. Ohgaki, Chem. Eng. Sci. 60 (2005)
[282] N. Elvassore, K. Vezzu, A. Bertucco, J. Supercrit. Fluids 33 (2005) 1–5. 3117–3119.
[283] F. Esmaeilzadeh, I. Goodarznia, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 49–51. [339] R.A. Harris, M. Wilken, K. Fischer, T.M. Letcher, J.D. Raal, D. Ramjugernath,
[284] M.C. Esmelindro, O.A.C. Antunes, E. Franceschi, G.R. Borges, M.L. Corazza, J.V. Fluid Phase Equilib. 260 (2007) 60–64.
Oliveira, W. Linhares, C. Dariva, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2050–2055. [340] M. Haruki, H. Yawata, M. Nishimoto, M. Tanto, S.i. Kihara, S. Takishima, Fluid
[285] J.M.S.S. Esperanca, P.F. Pires, H.J.R. Guedes, N. Ribeiro, T. Costa, A.I. Aguiar- Phase Equilib. 261 (2007) 92–98.
Ricardo, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1148–1155. [341] S. Hashimoto, S. Murayama, T. Sugahara, K. Ohgaki, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51
[286] M.B. Ewing, J.C.S. Ochoa, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 38 (2006) 289–295. (2006) 1884–1886.
[287] O. Fandino, E.R. López, L. Lugo, M. Teodorescu, A.M. Mainar, J. Fernández, J. [342] S. Hashimoto, T. Sugahara, H. Sato, K. Ohgaki, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007)
Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1854–1861. 517–520.
[288] J. Fang, E. Kiran, J. Supercrit. Fluids 38 (2006) 132–145. [343] S. Hashimoto, T. Sugahara, M. Moritoki, H. Sato, K. Ohgaki, Chem. Eng. Sci. 63
[289] T. Fang, M. Goto, M. Sasaki, T. Hirose, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 390–397. (2008) 1092–1097.
[290] T. Fang, Y. Shimoyama, T. Abeta, Y. Iwai, M. Sasaki, M. Goto, J. Supercrit. Fluids [344] L.J. He, G.M. Chen, X.L. Cui, Fluid Phase Equilib. 266 (2008) 84–89.
47 (2008) 140–146. [345] P.E. Hegel, G.D.B. Mabe, S. Pereda, M.S. Zabaloy, E.A. Brignole, J. Supercrit.
[291] R. Favareto, V.F. Cabral, M.L. Corazza, L. Cardozo-Filho, J. Supercrit. Fluids 45 Fluids 37 (2006) 316–322.
(2008) 161–170. [346] E.J. Hernández, G.D.B. Mabe, F.J. Senoráns, G. Reglero, T. Fornari, J. Chem. Eng.
[292] R. Favareto, P. Fregadolli, V.F. Cabral, O.A.C. Antunes, L. Cardozo-Filho, J. Chem. Data 53 (2008) 2632–2636.
Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1080–1084. [347] H. Higashi, Y. Iwai, K. Miyazaki, Y. Ogino, M. Oki, Y. Arai, J. Supercrit. Fluids 33
[293] L. Fedele, S. Bobbo, R. Camporese, R. Stryjek, Fluid Phase Equilib. 227 (2005) (2005) 15–20.
275–281. [348] H. Higashi, Y. Iwai, K. Matsumoto, Y. Kitani, F. Okazaki, Y. Shimoyama, Y. Arai,
[294] L. Fedele, S. Bobbo, M. Scattolini, R. Camporese, R. Stryjek, J. Chem. Eng. Data Fluid Phase Equilib. 228–229 (2005) 547–551.
50 (2005) 44–48. [349] Q.N. Ho, B.G. Lee, J.S. Lim, K.S. Yoo, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 419–424.
[295] L. Fedele, S. Bobbo, V. De Stefani, R. Camporese, R. Stryjek, J. Chem. Eng. Data [350] M. Hojjati, Y. Yamini, M. Khajeh, S. Rouhani, K. Gharanjig, J. Chem. Eng. Data
50 (2005) 128–132. 53 (2008) 634–638.
[296] L. Fedele, S. Bobbo, R. Camporese, M. Scattolini, Fluid Phase Equilib. 251 (2007) [351] Y. Honda, T. Sato, M. Uematsu, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 40 (2008) 208–211.
41–46. [352] H. Hong, M. Gong, J. Wu, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 2270–2273.
[297] R. Ferreira, M. Blesic, J.R. Trindade, I.M. Marrucho, J.N.C. Lopes, L.P.N. Rebelo, [353] L. Hong, M.C. Thies, R.M. Enick, J. Supercrit. Fluids 34 (2005) 11–16.
Green Chem. 10 (2008) 918–928. [354] L. Hong, D. Tapriyal, R.M. Enick, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1342–1345.
[298] L.J. Florusse, S. Raeissi, C.J. Peters, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1283–1285. [355] L. Hongling, Z. Rongjiao, T. Yiling, X. Hongfei, D. Zeliang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53
[299] G.K. Folas, O.J. Berg, E. Solbraa, A.O. Fredheim, G.M. Kontogeorgis, M.L. (2008) 2095–2100.
Michelsen, E.H. Stenby, Fluid Phase Equilib. 251 (2007) 52–58. [356] M. Hou, S. Liang, Z. Zhang, J. Song, T. Jiang, B. Han, Fluid Phase Equilib. 258
[300] G.K. Folas, G.M. Kontogeorgis, E. Solbraa, Fluid Phase Equilib. 255 (2007) 98. (2007) 108–114.
[301] E. Franceschi, M.H. Kunita, A.F. Rubira, E.C. Muniz, M.L. Corazza, J.V. Oliveira, [357] S.Y. Huang, M. Tang, S.L. Ho, Y.P. Chen, J. Supercrit. Fluids 42 (2007) 165–171.
C. Dariva, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 686–690. [358] Z. Huang, X.W. Yang, G.B. Sun, S.W. Song, S. Kawi, J. Supercrit. Fluids 36 (2005)
[302] E. Franceschi, M.H. Kunita, M.V. Tres, A.F. Rubira, E.C. Muniz, M.L. Corazza, C. 91–97.
Dariva, S.R.S. Ferreira, J.V. Oliveira, J. Supercrit. Fluids 44 (2008) 8–20. [359] Z. Huang, Y.C. Chiew, W.D. Lu, S. Kawi, Fluid Phase Equilib. 237 (2005) 9–15.
[303] J. Freitag, D. Tuma, T.V. Ulanova, G. Maurer, J. Supercrit. Fluids 42 (2007) [360] Z. Huang, G.B. Sun, S. Kawi, Y. Shi, R. Wen, S.W. Song, Fluid Phase Equilib. 238
48–59. (2005) 26–32.
J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69 65
[361] A.Z. Husain, G. Zwolak, F.P. Lucien, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 718–721. [421] K. Khimeche, P. Alessi, I. Kikic, A. Dahmani, J. Supercrit. Fluids 41 (2007) 10–19.
[362] J.W. Hutchings, K.L. Fuller, M.P. Heitz, M.M. Hoffmann, Green Chem. 7 (2005) [422] I. Kikic, P. Alessi, F. Eva, M. Moneghini, B. Perissutti, J. Supercrit. Fluids 38
475–478. (2006) 434–441.
[363] B.M. Hybertson, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1123–1127. [423] J.H. Kim, M.S. Kim, Fluid Phase Equilib. 238 (2005) 13–19.
[364] K. Hynynen, P. Uusi-Kyyny, J.P. Pokki, M. Pakkanen, J. Aittamaa, J. Chem. Eng. [424] T. Kim, G. Kim, J.Y. Park, J.S. Lim, K.P. Yoo, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006)
Data 51 (2006) 562–568. 3425–3433.
[365] E.C. Ihmels, K. Fischer, J. Gmehling, Fluid Phase Equilib. 228–229 (2005) [425] Y.S. Kim, J.H. Jang, B.D. Lim, J.W. Kang, C.S. Lee, Fluid Phase Equilib. 256 (2007)
155–171. 70–74.
[366] E.C. Ihmels, E.W. Lemmon, Fluid Phase Equilib. 260 (2007) 36–48. [426] Y.S. Kim, B.D. Lim, J.E. Lee, C.S. Lee, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1351–1354.
[367] J. Im, M. Kim, B.G. Lee, H. Kim, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 359–363. [427] Y. Kim, W. Bae, H. Kim, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1520–1524.
[368] J. Im, G. Lee, M.S. Shin, J. Lee, H. Kim, Fluid Phase Equilib. 248 (2006) 19–23. [428] F. Kiyono, H. Tajima, K. Ogasawara, A. Yamasaki, Fluid Phase Equilib. 235
[369] J. Im, G. Lee, H. Kim, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1126–1129. (2005) 112–121.
[370] J. Im, G. Lee, J. Lee, H. Kim, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 38 (2006) 1510–1514. [429] M. Kleiner, F. Tumakaka, G. Sadowski, H. Latz, M. Buback, Fluid Phase Equilib.
[371] J. Im, G. Lee, Y.J. Lee, H. Kim, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 39 (2007) 1164– 241 (2006) 113–123.
1167. [430] Z. Knez, M. Skerget, L. Ilic, C. Lütge, J. Supercrit. Fluids 43 (2008) 383–389.
[372] J. Im, G. Lee, J. Lee, H. Kim, Fluid Phase Equilib. 251 (2007) 59–62. [431] D. Kodama, R. Sato, A. Haneda, M. Kato, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 122–124.
[373] J. Im, G. Lee, Y.J. Lee, H. Kim, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 391–394. [432] D. Kodama, R. Sato, A. Haneda, M. Kato, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005)
[374] S. Imai, K. Okutani, R. Ohmura, Y.H. Mori, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1902–1904.
1783–1786. [433] D. Kodama, M. Kato, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 16–17.
[375] S. Imai, K. Miyake, R. Ohmura, Y.H. Mori, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) [434] G. Koglbauer, M. Wendland, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 77–82.
2222–2224. [435] M. Koh, J. Yoo, Y. Park, D. Bae, K. Park, H. Kim, H. Kim, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45
[376] S. Imai, K. Miyake, R. Ohmura, Y.H. Mori, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) (2006) 5308–5313.
1056–1059. [436] M. Kojima, M. Tosaka, E. Funami, K. Nitta, M. Ohshima, S. Kohjiya, J. Supercrit.
[377] H. Inomata, A. Kondo, H. Kakehashi, Fluid Phase Equilib. 228–229 (2005) Fluids 35 (2005) 175–181.
335–343. [437] C.Y. Kong, N.R.W. Withanage, T. Funazukuri, S. Kagei, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50
[378] S. Ismadji, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2207–2210. (2005) 1635–1640.
[379] Y. Iwai, H. Nagano, G.S. Lee, M. Uno, Y. Arai, J. Supercrit. Fluids 38 (2006) [438] C.Y. Kong, N.R.W. Withanage, T. Funazukuri, S. Kagei, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50
312–318. (2005) 2112.
[380] A. Jabloniec, S. Horstmann, J. Gmehling, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007) [439] C.Y. Kong, T. Funazukuri, S. Kagei, J. Supercrit. Fluids 37 (2006) 359–366.
4654–4659. [440] C.Y. Kong, N. Takahashi, T. Funazukuri, S. Kagei, Fluid Phase Equilib. 257 (2007)
[381] J.A.G. Jammaer, R. Mellaerts, S. Laenen, L. Thomassen, P. Augustijns, G. Van den 223–227.
Mooter, K. Elst, L. Van Ginneken, J.A. Martens, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) [441] G.M. Kontogeorgis, W. Yan, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 4347–4348.
2573–2575. [442] U. Kopcak, R.S. Mohamed, J. Supercrit. Fluids 34 (2005) 209–214.
[382] J. Janisch, G. Raabe, J. Kohler, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1897–1903. [443] D. Koschel, J.Y. Coxam, L. Rodier, V. Majer, Fluid Phase Equilib. 247 (2006)
[383] J.-N. Jaubert, S. Vitu, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2001. 107–120.
[384] M. Jelinek, A. Levy, I. Borde, Int. J. Refrig. 30 (2007) 471–481. [444] D. Koschel, J.Y. Coxam, V. Majer, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 1421–1430.
[385] M.H. Jenab, M.A. Abdi, S.H. Najibi, M. Vahidi, N.S. Matin, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 [445] A.F. Kostko, S.H. Lee, J. Liu, T.P. DiNoia, Y. Kim, M.A. McHugh, J. Chem. Eng.
(2005) 583–586. Data 53 (2008) 1626–1629.
[386] K. Jeong, J. Im, S. Lee, H. Kim, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 39 (2007) 531–535. [446] P. Kotnik, A. Perva-Uzunalic, M. Skerget, Z. Knez, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005)
[387] K. Jeong, J. Im, G. Lee, Y.J. Lee, H. Kim, Fluid Phase Equilib. 251 (2007) 63–67. 1823–1828.
[388] D. Jerinic, J. Schmidt, K. Fischer, L. Friedel, Fluid Phase Equilib. 264 (2008) [447] T. Kozaki, S. Takeya, R. Ohmura, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2820–2823.
253–258. [448] M.C. Kroon, A. Shariati, M. Costantini, J. van Spronsen, G.-J. Witkamp, R.A.
[389] X. Ji, Z. Qin, G. Wang, M. Dong, X. Hou, J. Wang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) Sheldon, C.J. Peters, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 173–176.
1156–1160. [449] E. Kuehne, C.J. Peters, J.v. Spronsen, G.-J. Witkamp, Green Chem. 8 (2006)
[390] R. Jimenez-Gallegos, L.A. Galicia-Luna, C. Bouchot, L.E. Camacho-Camacho, O. 287–291.
Elizalde-Solis, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1629–1633. [450] E. Kuehne, S. Santarossa, G.-J. Witkamp, C.J. Peters, Green Chem. 10 (2008)
[391] R. Jimenez-Gallegos, L.A. Galicia-Luna, O. Elizalde-Solis, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 762–766.
(2006) 1624–1628. [451] E. Kuehne, G.-J. Witkamp, C.J. Peters, Green Chem. 10 (2008) 929–933.
[392] J. Jin, Z. Zhang, Q.s. Li, Y. Li, E.p. Yu, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 801–803. [452] E. Kuehne, S. Santarossa, E. Perez, G.-J. Witkamp, C.J. Peters, J. Supercrit. Fluids
[393] M. Jodecke, Á.P.-S. Kamps, G. Maurer, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1003–1009. 46 (2008) 93–98.
[394] F.-Y. Jou, A.E. Mather, Fluid Phase Equilib. 228–229 (2005) 465–469. [453] E. Kuehne, E.S. Calvo, G.-J. Witkamp, C.J. Peters, J. Supercrit. Fluids 45 (2008)
[395] F.-Y. Jou, K.A.G. Schmidt, A.E. Mather, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1983–1985. 293–297.
[396] F.-Y. Jou, A.E. Mather, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1141–1143. [454] E. Kuehne, E. Perez, G.-J. Witkamp, C.J. Peters, J. Supercrit. Fluids 45 (2008)
[397] F.-Y. Jou, A.E. Mather, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1429–1430. 27–31.
[398] F.-Y. Jou, K.A.G. Schmidt, A.E. Mather, Fluid Phase Equilib. 240 (2006) 220–223. [455] B. Kulik, S. Kruse, J. Pelto, J. Supercrit. Fluids 47 (2008) 135–139.
[399] F.Y. Jou, A.E. Mather, Int. J. Thermophys. 28 (2007) 490–495. [456] R. Kumar, H.j. Wu, P. Englezos, Fluid Phase Equilib. 244 (2006) 167–171.
[400] S. Jung, M.S. Shin, H. Kim, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 656–659. [457] R. Kumar, P. Linga, I. Moudrakovski, J.A. Ripmeester, P. Englezos, AICHE J. 54
[401] M. Kaboudvand, H.S. Ghaziaskar, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1841–1845. (2008) 2132–2144.
[402] M. Kaboudvand, H.S. Ghaziaskar, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2722. [458] J. Kumelan, Á.P.-S. Kamps, I. Urukova, D. Tuma, G. Maurer, J. Chem. Thermodyn.
[403] C.G. Kalogiannis, C.G. Panayiotou, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1442–1447. 37 (2005) 595–602.
[404] C.G. Kalogiannis, C.G. Panayiotou, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 107–111. [459] J. Kumelan, Á.P.-S. Kamps, D. Tuma, G. Maurer, Fluid Phase Equilib. 228–229
[405] Á.P.-S. Kamps, M. Jodecke, M. Vogt, J. Xia, G. Maurer, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2005) 207–211.
(2006) 3673–3677. [460] J. Kumelan, Á.P.-S. Kamps, D. Tuma, G. Maurer, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006)
[406] Á.P.-S. Kamps, M. Jodecke, J. Xia, M. Vogt, G. Maurer, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 11–14.
(2006) 1505–1515. [461] J. Kumelan, D. Tuma, G. Maurer, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1802–1807.
[407] Á.P.-S. Kamps, E. Meyer, B. Rumpf, G. Maurer, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) [462] J. Kumelan, Á.P.-S. Kamps, D. Tuma, G. Maurer, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006)
817–832. 1364–1367.
[408] P. Karásek, J. Planeta, M. Roth, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 4454–4460. [463] J. Kumelan, Á.P.-S. Kamps, D. Tuma, G. Maurer, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 38 (2006)
[409] P. Karásek, J. Planeta, M. Roth, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 616–622. 1396–1401.
[410] P. Karásek, J. Planeta, M. Roth, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 160–164. [464] J. Kumelan, Á.P.-S. Kamps, I. Urukova, D. Tuma, G. Maurer, J. Chem. Thermodyn.
[411] P. Karásek, J. Planeta, M. Roth, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 816–819. 39 (2007) 335.
[412] A. Kasturirangan, C.S. Grant, A.S. Teja, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 (2008) 645–649. [465] J. Kumelan, Á.P.-S. Kamps, D. Tuma, G. Maurer, Fluid Phase Equilib. 260 (2007)
[413] M. Kato, D. Kodama, M. Sato, K. Sugiyama, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 3–8.
1031–1034. [466] J. Kumelan, Á.P.-S. Kamps, D. Tuma, G. Maurer, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007)
[414] M. Kato, K. Sugiyama, M. Sato, D. Kodama, Fluid Phase Equilib. 257 (2007) 8236–8240.
207–211. [467] J. Kumelan, Á.P.-S. Kamps, D. Tuma, G. Maurer, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007)
[415] Y. Kayukawa, M. Hasumoto, Y. Kano, K. Watanabe, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 2319–2324.
565–578. [468] J. Kumelan, D. Tuma, S.P. Verevkin, G. Maurer, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008)
[416] Y. Kayukawa, K. Fujii, Y. Higashi, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 579–582. 2844–2850.
[417] M.A. Kelland, T.M. Svartaas, J. Ïvsthus, T. Tomita, K. Mizuta, Chem. Eng. Sci. 61 [469] J. Kumelan, Á.P.-S. Kamps, D. Tuma, A. Yokozeki, M.B. Shiflett, G. Maurer, J.
(2006) 4290–4298. Phys. Chem. B 112 (2008) 3040–3047.
[418] M.A. Kelland, T.M. Svartaas, J. Ïvsthus, T. Tomita, J.i. Chosa, Chem. Eng. Sci. 61 [470] Y. Kunita, T. Makino, T. Sugahara, K. Ohgaki, Fluid Phase Equilib. 251 (2007)
(2006) 4048–4059. 145–148.
[419] M. Khajeh, Y. Yamini, R. Miri, B. Hemmateenejad, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) [471] V. Kutcherov, Int. J. Thermophys. 27 (2006) 467–473.
348–351. [472] C.H. Kwon, M.D. Seo, S.W. Kim, C.S. Lee, J.W. Kang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007)
[420] W. Khalil, C. Coquelet, D. Richon, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 2032–2040. 727–730.
66 J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69
[473] S. Kwon, W. Bae, H. Kim, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1560–1563. [533] Y. Maeda, T. Niori, J. Yamamoto, H. Yokoyama, Thermochim. Acta 431 (2005)
[474] S. Kwon, W. Bae, K. Lee, H.S. Byun, H. Kim, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 89–92. 87–93.
[475] H. Laavi, P. Uusi-Kyyny, J.P. Pokki, M. Pakkanen, V. Alopaeus, J. Chem. Eng. [534] Y. Maeda, H. Yokoyama, Thermochim. Acta 441 (2006) 156–161.
Data 53 (2008) 913–918. [535] T. Maekawa, Fluid Phase Equilib. 243 (2006) 115–120.
[476] J. Lachwa, P. Morgado, J.M.S.S. Esperanca, H.J.R. Guedes, J.N. Canongia Lopes, [536] T. Maekawa, Fluid Phase Equilib. 267 (2008) 1–5.
L.P.N. Rebelo, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 2215–2221. [537] T. Makino, M. Tongu, T. Sugahara, K. Ohgaki, Fluid Phase Equilib. 233 (2005)
[477] M. Lanza, P.M. Ndiaye, F.W. Tavares, D. Oliveira, C. Dariva, J.V. Oliveira, J. 129–133.
Supercrit. Fluids 34 (2005) 215–221. [538] M.A. Marcelino Neto, J.R. Barbosa Jr., Int. J. Refrig. 31 (2008) 34–44.
[478] E.N. Lay, V. Taghikhani, C. Ghotbi, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 2197–2200. [539] P. Marchi, G. Scalabrin, E.C. Ihmels, K. Fischer, J. Gmehling, J. Chem. Thermo-
[479] M.J. Lazzaroni, D. Bush, J.S. Brown, C.A. Eckert, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) dyn. 38 (2006) 1247–1253.
60–65. [540] M.C. Martinez, D. Dalmazzone, W. Furst, A. Delahaye, L. Fournaison, AICHE J.
[480] M.J. Lazzaroni, D. Bush, C.A. Eckert, R. Gläser, J. Supercrit. Fluids 37 (2006) 54 (2008) 1088–1095.
135–141. [541] K. Matsuyama, K. Mishima, Fluid Phase Equilib. 249 (2006) 173–178.
[481] T.T. Le, M.A. Trebble, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 683–686. [542] K. Matsuyama, K. Mishima, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1151–1154.
[482] J. Ledru, C.T. Imrie, J.M. Hutchinson, G.W.H. Höhne, Thermochim. Acta 446 [543] E.F. May, M.R. Moldover, J.W. Schmidt, Int. J. Thermophys. 26 (2005) 563–
(2006) 66–72. 576.
[483] B.C. Lee, S.L. Outcalt, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 892–897. [544] Y. Medina-Gonzalez, S. Thiebaud-Roux, P. De-Caro, L. Hernandez-Ochoa, Z.
[484] L.s. Lee, H.j. Ou, H.l. Hsu, Fluid Phase Equilib. 231 (2005) 221–230. Mouloungui, J. Supercrit. Fluids 38 (2006) 13–17.
[485] L.s. Lee, H.Y. Liu, Y.C. Wu, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 102–107. [545] E. Meyer, V. Ermatchkov, Á.P.-S. Kamps, G. Maurer, Fluid Phase Equilib. 244
[486] S. Lee, J. Zhang, R. Mehta, T.K. Woo, J.W. Lee, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) (2006) 137–152.
4734–4739. [546] M. Milhet, J. Pauly, J.A.P. Coutinho, J.L. Daridon, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007)
[487] G.A. Leeke, R.C. Santos, B. Al-Duri, J. Seville, C. Smith, A.B. Holmes, J. Chem. 1250–1254.
Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1370–1374. [547] M. Milhet, J. Pauly, J.A.P. Coutinho, J.L. Daridon, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008)
[488] G.A. Leeke, J. Cai, M. Jenkins, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1877–1879. 233–237.
[489] G. Levitin, D. Bush, C.A. Eckert, D.W. Hess, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1787. [548] H. Miyamoto, M. Uematsu, Int. J. Thermophys. 27 (2006) 1052–1060.
[490] A. Li, S. Tang, P. Tan, C. Liu, B. Liang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 2339–2344. [549] H. Miyamoto, M. Uematsu, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 39 (2007) 827–832.
[491] D.L. Li, J.W. Du, S.S. Fan, D.Q. Liang, X.S. Li, N.S. Huang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 [550] A.H. Mohammadi, A. Chapoy, B. Tohidi, D. Richon, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005)
(2007) 1916–1918. 541–545.
[492] G. Li, H. Li, J. Wang, C.B. Park, Cell. Polym. 25 (2006) 237–248. [551] A.H. Mohammadi, A. Chapoy, B. Tohidi, D. Richon, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45
[493] G. Li, J. Wang, C.B. Park, R. Simha, J. Polym. Sci. B: Polym. Phys. 45 (2007) (2006) 4825–4829.
2497–2508. [552] A.H. Mohammadi, D. Richon, Fluid Phase Equilib. 254 (2007) 224.
[494] J. Li, M. Rodrigues, A. Paiva, H.A. Matos, E. Gomes de Azevedo, Fluid Phase [553] A.H. Mohammadi, D. Richon, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 2509–2510.
Equilib. 241 (2006) 196–204. [554] A.H. Mohammadi, W. Afzal, D. Richon, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 40 (2008)
[495] J. Li, M. Rodrigues, A. Paiva, H.A. Matos, E. Gomes de Azevedo, J. Supercrit. 1693–1697.
Fluids 41 (2007) 343–351. [555] A.H. Mohammadi, I. Kraouti, D. Richon, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 (2008)
[496] J. Li, Z. Qin, G. Wang, M. Dong, J. Wang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1736–1740. 8492–8495.
[497] S. Li, Y. Li, J. Wang, Fluid Phase Equilib. 253 (2007) 54–60. [556] A.H. Mohammadi, W. Afzal, D. Richon, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 73–76.
[498] W. Li, J. Jin, G. Tian, Z. Zhang, Fluid Phase Equilib. 264 (2008) 93–98. [557] A.H. Mohammadi, W. Afzal, D. Richon, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 683–686.
[499] X. Li, M. Hou, B. Han, X. Wang, L. Zou, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 548–550. [558] S. Mokraoui, C. Coquelet, A. Valtz, P.E. Hegel, D. Richon, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
[500] X. Li, M. Hou, B. Han, X. Wang, G. Yang, L. Zou, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 46 (2007) 9257–9262.
1216–1219. [559] I. Montequi, E. Alonso, A. Martín, M.J. Cocero, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2007)
[501] Z. Lian, S.A. Epstein, C.W. Blenk, A.D. Shine, J. Supercrit. Fluids 39 (2006) 204–206.
107–117. [560] M.M. Mooijer-van den Heuvel, N.M. Sawirjo, C.J. Peters, Fluid Phase Equilib.
[502] S. Libotean, D. Salavera, M. Valles, X. Esteve, A. Coronas, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 241 (2006) 124–137.
(2007) 1050–1055. [561] P. Morawski, J.A.P. Coutinho, U. Domanska, Fluid Phase Equilib. 230 (2005)
[503] J.S. Lim, J.Y. Park, J.W. Kang, B.G. Lee, Fluid Phase Equilib. 243 (2006) 57–63. 72–80.
[504] J.S. Lim, G. Seong, H.S. Byun, Fluid Phase Equilib. 259 (2007) 165–172. [562] O. Morch, K. Nasrifar, O. Bolland, E. Solbraa, A.O. Fredheim, L.H. Gjertsen, Fluid
[505] J.S. Lim, G. Seong, H.K. Roh, H.S. Byun, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1313–1318. Phase Equilib. 239 (2006) 138–145.
[506] J.S. Lim, G. Seong, H.K. Roh, B.G. Lee, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 2250–2256. [563] L.S. Moura, M.L. Corazza, L. Cardozo-Filho, M.A. Meireles, J. Chem. Eng. Data
[507] J.S. Lim, Y.G. Jung, K.P. Yoo, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 2405–2408. 50 (2005) 1657–1661.
[508] J.S. Lim, J.M. Jin, K.P. Yoo, J. Supercrit. Fluids 44 (2008) 279–283. [564] F. Mutelet, S. Vitu, R. Privat, J.-N. Jaubert, Fluid Phase Equilib. 238 (2005)
[509] C. Lin, K.M. Ng, C. Wibowo, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 3580–3589. 157–168.
[510] W. Lin, A. Delahaye, L. Fournaison, Fluid Phase Equilib. 264 (2008) 220–227. [565] P. Münüklü, F.E. Wubbolts, T.W. de Loos, P.J. Jansens, J. Supercrit. Fluids 39
[511] P. Linga, R. Kumar, P. Englezos, Chem. Eng. Sci. 62 (2007) 4268–4276. (2006) 1–5.
[512] J.F. Liu, H.J. Yang, W. Wang, Z. Li, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2189–2192. [566] Y. Nagai, H. Yoshioka, M. Ota, Y. Sato, H. Inomata, R.L. Smith Jr., AICHE J. 54
[513] J. Liu, Y. Kim, M.A. McHugh, J. Supercrit. Fluids 39 (2006) 201–205. (2008) 3007–3016.
[514] J. Liu, Y. Kim, M.A. McHugh, Fluid Phase Equilib. 248 (2006) 44–49. [567] I. Nagy, R.A. Krenz, R.A. Heidemann, T.W. de Loos, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005)
[515] J. Liu, D. Li, H.S. Byun, M.A. McHugh, Fluid Phase Equilib. 267 (2008) 39–46. 1492–1495.
[516] J. Liu, D. Li, H.S. Byun, M.A. McHugh, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 (2008) 524–529. [568] I. Nagy, T.W. de Loos, R.A. Krenz, R.A. Heidemann, J. Supercrit. Fluids 37 (2006)
[517] J. Liu, Z. Shervani, P. Raveendran, Y. Ikushima, J. Supercrit. Fluids 33 (2005) 115–124.
121–130. [569] I. Nagy, R.A. Krenz, R.A. Heidemann, T.W. de Loos, J. Supercrit. Fluids 40 (2007)
[518] K. Liu, E. Kiran, J. Supercrit. Fluids 39 (2006) 192–200. 125–133.
[519] S. Liu, D.H. Lee, H.S. Byun, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 410–418. [570] V. Najdanovic-Visak, L.P.N. Rebelo, M.N. Nunes da Ponte, Green Chem. 7
[520] S. Liu, J.S. Lim, J.W. Kang, H.S. Byun, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 175–179. (2005) 443–450.
[521] Z.-T. Liu, J. Wu, L. Liu, L. Song, Z. Gao, W. Dong, J. Lu, Green Chem. 8 (2006) [571] K. Nasrifar, M.M. Mooijer-van den Heuvel, C.J. Peters, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53
978–983. (2008) 2328–2332.
[522] Z.-T. Liu, L. Liu, J. Wu, L. Song, Z. Gao, W. Dong, J. Lu, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 [572] P.M. Ndiaye, E. Franceschi, D. Oliveira, C. Dariva, F.W. Tavares, J.V. Oliveira, J.
(2006) 2045–2050. Supercrit. Fluids 37 (2006) 29–37.
[523] Z.-T. Liu, L. Liu, J. Wu, J. Lu, P. Sun, L. Song, Z. Liu, W. Dong, Z. Gao, Ind. Eng. [573] B.J. Neely, J. Wagner, R.L. Robinson, K.A.M. Gasem, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008)
Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 22–28. 165–174.
[524] F. Llovell, L.J. Florusse, C.J. Peters, L.F. Vega, J. Phys. Chem. B 111 (2007) [574] E.D. Nikitin, A.P. Popov, Y.G. Yatluk, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 609–611.
10180–10188. [575] E.D. Nikitin, A.P. Popov, Y.G. Yatluk, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1326–1330.
[525] J.A. Lopes, M.N. Nunes da Ponte, J. Supercrit. Fluids 34 (2005) 189–194. [576] E.D. Nikitin, A.P. Popov, Y.G. Yatluk, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1335–1338.
[526] Z.K. Lopez-Castillo, S.N.V.K. Aki, M.A. Stadtherr, J.F. Brennecke, Ind. Eng. Chem. [577] E.D. Nikitin, A.P. Popov, Y.G. Yatluk, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1336–1339.
Res. 45 (2006) 5351–5360. [578] E.D. Nikitin, A.P. Popov, V.A. Simakina, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008)
[527] Z.K. Lopez-Castillo, S.N.V.K. Aki, M.A. Stadtherr, J.F. Brennecke, Ind. Eng. Chem. 1371–1374.
Res. 47 (2007) 570–576. [579] M. Nobakht, S. Moghadam, Y. Gu, Fluid Phase Equilib. 265 (2008) 94–103.
[528] C. Lu, Y. Tian, W. Xu, D. Li, R. Zhu, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 40 (2008) 321–329. [580] M. Nobakht, S. Moghadam, Y. Gu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 (2008) 8918–8925.
[529] Q.L. Ma, G.J. Chen, C.F. Ma, L.W. Zhang, Fluid Phase Equilib. 265 (2008) 84–93. [581] A.V.M. Nunes, A.A. Matias, M.N. Nunes da Ponte, C.M.M. Duarte, J. Chem. Eng.
[530] H. Madani, A. Valtz, C. Coquelet, A.H. Meniai, D. Richon, J. Chem. Thermodyn. Data 52 (2007) 244–247.
40 (2008) 1490–1494. [582] D.J. Oh, B.C. Lee, S.J. Hwang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1273–1279.
[531] H. Madani, A. Valtz, C. Coquelet, A.H. Meniai, D. Richon, Fluid Phase Equilib. [583] R. Ohmura, S. Matsuda, T. Uchida, T. Ebinuma, H. Narita, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50
268 (2008) 68–73. (2005) 993–996.
[532] H. Madani, A. Valtz, C. Coquelet, A.H. Meniai, D. Richon, Fluid Phase Equilib. [584] R. Ohmura, S. Matsuda, S. Takeya, T. Ebinuma, H. Narita, Int. J. Thermophys.
273 (2008) 92. 26 (2005) 1515–1523.
J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69 67
[585] R. Ohmura, S. Takeya, T. Maekawa, T. Uchida, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) [640] K.A.G. Schmidt, F.Y. Jou, A.E. Mather, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1725–1727.
161–163. [641] C.E. Schwarz, I. Nieuwoudt, J.H. Knoetze, Fluid Phase Equilib. 247 (2006)
[586] N.A. Ovchinnikov, B.A. Grigoryev, B.V. Nemzer, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 169–174.
425–428. [642] C.E. Schwarz, I. Nieuwoudt, J.H. Knoetze, J. Supercrit. Fluids 41 (2007)
[587] A. Özcan, A.S. Özcan, Fluid Phase Equilib. 249 (2006) 1–5. 327–334.
[588] A. Paiva, K. Gerasimov, G. Brunner, Fluid Phase Equilib. 267 (2008) 104–112. [643] C.E. Schwarz, I. Nieuwoudt, J.H. Knoetze, J. Supercrit. Fluids 40 (2007)
[589] J. Pan, J. Wu, Z. Liu, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 186–189. 189–193.
[590] J.Y. Park, J.S. Lim, Y.W. Lee, K.P. Yoo, Fluid Phase Equilib. 240 (2006) 101–108. [644] C.E. Schwarz, J.H. Knoetze, Fluid Phase Equilib. 258 (2007) 51–57.
[591] J.Y. Park, S.Y. Kim, H.S. Byun, K.P. Yoo, J.S. Lim, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) [645] C.E. Schwarz, G.J.K. Bonthuys, J.H. Knoetze, A.J. Burger, J. Supercrit. Fluids 46
6092. (2008) 233–237.
[592] J.Y. Park, S.Y. Kim, H.S. Byun, K.P. Yoo, J.S. Lim, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) [646] S. Schwinghammer, M. Siebenhofer, R. Marr, J. Supercrit. Fluids 38 (2006) 1–6.
3381–3387. [647] G. Sciaini, E. Marceca, R. Fernández-Prini, J. Supercrit. Fluids 35 (2005)
[593] K.K. Park, S.H. Han, S.H. Lee, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1618–1621. 106–110.
[594] S.J. Park, K.J. Han, J. Gmehling, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1814–1818. [648] A.M. Scurto, E. Newton, R.R. Weikel, L.C. Draucker, J.P. Hallett, C.L. Liotta, W.
[595] Y. Park, J. Kang, J. Choi, J. Yoo, H. Kim, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1203–1208. Leitner, C.A. Eckert, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 (2008) 493–501.
[596] M. Pasanen, A. Zaytseva, P. Uusi-Kyyny, J.P. Pokki, M. Pakkanen, J. Aittamaa, J. [649] C. Secuianu, V. Feroiu, D. Geana, Fluid Phase Equilib. 261 (2007) 337–342.
Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 554–561. [650] C. Secuianu, V. Feroiu, D. Geana, J. Supercrit. Fluids 47 (2008) 109–116.
[597] J. Pauly, J.A.P. Coutinho, J.L. Daridon, Fluid Phase Equilib. 255 (2007) 193–199. [651] C. Secuianu, V. Feroiu, D. Geana, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2444–2448.
[598] D. Pecar, V. Dolecek, J. Supercrit. Fluids 40 (2007) 200–207. [652] Y. Seo, S.P. Kang, S. Lee, H. Lee, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2833–2837.
[599] Y. Perez de Diego, F.E. Wubbolts, G.-J. Witkamp, T.W. de Loos, P.J. Jansens, J. [653] G. Seong, J.S. Lim, H.K. Roh, B.C. Lee, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 189–193.
Supercrit. Fluids 35 (2005) 1–9. [654] G. Seong, J.S. Lim, H.S. Byun, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1470–1473.
[600] E. Perez, A. Cabanas, Y. Sanchez-Vicente, J.A.R. Renuncio, C. Pando, J. Supercrit. [655] G. Seong, K.P. Yoo, J.S. Lim, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2783–2786.
Fluids 46 (2008) 238–244. [656] V. Serrano-Cocoletzi, L.A. Galicia-Luna, O. Elizalde-Solis, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50
[601] E. Perez, A. Cabanas, J.A.R. Renuncio, Y. Sánchez-Vicente, C. Pando, J. Chem. (2005) 1631–1634.
Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2649–2653. [657] M. Shamsipur, J. Fasihi, A. Khanchi, Y. Yamini, A. Valinezhad, H. Sharghi, J.
[602] R. Pinero, J. Garcia, M. Sokolova, M.J. Cocero, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 39 (2007) Supercrit. Fluids 47 (2008) 154–160.
536–549. [658] A. Shariati, C.J. Peters, J. Supercrit. Fluids 34 (2005) 171–176.
[603] N.G. Polikhronidi, G.V. Stepanov, I.M. Abdulagatov, R.G. Batyrova, Ther- [659] A. Shariati, K.I. Gutkowski, C.J. Peters, AICHE J. 51 (2005) 1532–1540.
mochim. Acta 454 (2007) 99–108. [660] Z. Shen, K.M. Lott, M.E. Wright, M.A. McHugh, Fluid Phase Equilib. 238 (2005)
[604] W. Poot, T.W. de Loos, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 (2008) 5146–5151. 210–219.
[605] J. Qin, R.J. Rosenbauer, Z. Duan, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1246–1249. [661] Z. Shen, D. Li, M.A. McHugh, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 2056–2064.
[606] D. Qiu, J. Fu, J. Cai, C. Peng, H. Liu, Y. Hu, Fluid Phase Equilib. 248 (2006) [662] M.B. Shiflett, A. Yokozeki, AICHE J. 52 (2006) 1205–1219.
191–196. [663] M.B. Shiflett, M.A. Harmer, C.P. Junk, A. Yokozeki, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006)
[607] S. Raeissi, C.J. Peters, J. Supercrit. Fluids 35 (2005) 10–17. 483–495.
[608] S. Raeissi, C.J. Peters, J. Supercrit. Fluids 33 (2005) 201–208. [664] M.B. Shiflett, A. Yokozeki, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1931–1939.
[609] R. Rajasingam, T. Tran, F.P. Lucien, J. Supercrit. Fluids 33 (2005) 69–76. [665] M.B. Shiflett, A. Yokozeki, J. Phys. Chem. B 111 (2007) 2070–2074.
[610] A. Rajendran, B. Bonavoglia, N. Forrer, G. Storti, M. Mazzotti, M. Morbidelli, [666] M.B. Shiflett, D.J. Kasprzak, C.P. Junk, A. Yokozeki, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 40
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005) 2549–2560. (2008) 25–31.
[611] S. Ravipaty, A.G. Sclafani, B.R. Fonslow, D.J. Chesney, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 [667] M.B. Shiflett, A. Yokozeki, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 492–497.
(2006) 1310–1315. [668] Y. Shimoyama, Y. Iwai, K. Yamada, M. Yamakita, Y. Arai, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51
[612] S. Ravipaty, K.J. Koebke, D.J. Chesney, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 415–421. (2006) 51–55.
[613] J.C. Reis, N. Ribeiro, A.I. Aguiar-Ricardo, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 478– [669] Y. Shimoyama, Y. Iwai, B.S. Jin, T. Hirayama, Y. Arai, Fluid Phase Equilib. 257
484. (2007) 217–222.
[614] N. Ribeiro, T. Costa, A.I. Aguiar-Ricardo, J.M.S.S. Esperanca, P.F. Pires, H.J.R. [670] Y. Shimoyama, M. Sonoda, K. Miyazaki, H. Higashi, Y. Iwai, Y. Arai, J. Supercrit.
Guedes, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1906–1914. Fluids 44 (2008) 266–272.
[615] M.J. Richardson, J.H. Johnston, P.T. Northcote, AICHE J. 52 (2006) 422–424. [671] E.K. Shin, B.C. Lee, J.S. Lim, J. Supercrit. Fluids 45 (2008) 282–292.
[616] N. Riesco, J.P.M. Trusler, Fluid Phase Equilib. 228–229 (2005) 233–238. [672] E.K. Shin, B.C. Lee, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2728–2734.
[617] F. Rivollet, C. Jarne, D. Richon, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1883–1890. [673] J. Shin, Y.W. Lee, H. Kim, W. Bae, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1571–1575.
[618] J.E. Rodrigues, M.E. Araujo, F.F.M. Azevedo, N.T. Machado, J. Supercrit. Fluids [674] J. Shin, M.S. Shin, W. Bae, Y.W. Lee, H. Kim, J. Supercrit. Fluids 44 (2008)
34 (2005) 223–229. 260–265.
[619] R.F. Rodrigues, A.K. Tashima, R.M.S. Pereira, R.S. Mohamed, F.A. Cabral, J. [675] J. Shin, W. Bae, B.G. Kim, J.C. Lee, H.S. Byun, H. Kim, J. Supercrit. Fluids 47
Supercrit. Fluids 43 (2008) 375–382. (2008) 1–7.
[620] J. Roininen, P. Uusi-Kyyny, J.P. Pokki, M. Pakkanen, V. Alopaeus, J. Chem. Eng. [676] J. Shin, K.S. Oh, W. Bae, Y.W. Lee, H. Kim, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 (2008)
Data 53 (2008) 607–612. 5680–5685.
[621] L.J. Rovetto, S.B. Bottini, E.A. Brignole, C.J. Peters, J. Supercrit. Fluids 35 (2005) [677] J. Shin, W. Bae, H. Kim, Y.W. Lee, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1523–1527.
182–196. [678] M.S. Shin, J.K. Yeo, H. Kim, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 40 (2008) 16–20.
[622] L.J. Rovetto, C.J. Peters, E.A. Brignole, J. Supercrit. Fluids 34 (2005) 183–187. [679] M.S. Shin, H. Kim, Fluid Phase Equilib. 270 (2008) 45–49.
[623] T. Saito, Y. Iwai, Y. Arai, F. Nakadai, D. Taniguchi, K. Ochi, T. Furuya, J. Chem. [680] M.S. Shin, J.H. Lee, H. Kim, Fluid Phase Equilib. 272 (2008) 42–46.
Eng. Jpn. 39 (2006) 907–914. [681] G. Silva-Oliver, G. Eliosa-Jiménez, F. García-Sánchez, J.R. Avendano-Gómez,
[624] A. Sakabe, D. Arai, H. Miyamoto, M. Uematsu, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 40 (2008) Fluid Phase Equilib. 250 (2006) 37–48.
1527–1530. [682] G. Silva-Oliver, G. Eliosa-Jiménez, F. García-Sánchez, J.R. Avendano-Gómez, J.
[625] J. Sakamoto, S. Hashimoto, T. Tsuda, T. Sugahara, Y. Inoue, K. Ohgaki, Chem. Supercrit. Fluids 42 (2007) 36–47.
Eng. Sci. 63 (2008) 5789–5794. [683] V.P. Sinditskii, M.C. Vu, A.B. Sheremetev, N.S. Alexandrova, Thermochim. Acta
[626] N.I. Sakellarios, S.G. Kazarian, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 37 (2005) 621–626. 473 (2008) 25–31.
[627] B. Saleh, M. Wendland, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 429–437. [684] M. Skerget, L. Cretnik, Z. Knez, M. Skrinjar, Fluid Phase Equilib. 231 (2005)
[628] C.G. Salzmann, T. Loerting, S. Klotz, P.W. Mirwald, A. Hallbrucker, E. Mayer, 11–19.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8 (2006) 386–397. [685] S.S. Skiba, E.G. Larionov, A.Y. Manakov, B.A. Kolesov, V.I. Kosyakov, J. Phys.
[629] K.L. Sandhya, D.S. Shankar Rao, S.K. Prasad, U.S. Hiremath, C.V. Yelamaggad, Chem. B 111 (2007) 11214–11220.
Thermochim. Acta 452 (2007) 65–70. [686] M. Soares da Silva, M. Temtem, S. Henriques, T. Casimiro, A.I. Aguiar-Ricardo,
[630] W.L.F. Santos, R. Favareto, V.F. Cabral, E.C. Muniz, L. Cardozo-Filho, A.F. Rubira, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1970–1974.
J. Supercrit. Fluids 38 (2006) 319–325. [687] B.M.C. Soares, F.M.C. Gamarra, L.C. Paviani, L.A.G. Goncalves, F.A. Cabral, J.
[631] M. Sato, G. Masui, M. Uematsu, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 37 (2005) 931–934. Supercrit. Fluids 43 (2007) 25–31.
[632] Y. Sato, H. Hashiguchi, K. Inohara, S. Takishima, H. Masuoka, Fluid Phase Equi- [688] A.N. Soriano, B.T. Doma, M.H. Li, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2550–2555.
lib. 257 (2007) 124–130. [689] D.L. Sparks, R. Hernandez, L.A. Estévez, N. Meyer, T. French, J. Chem. Eng. Data
[633] K. Sawada, M. Oshima, M. Sugimito, M. Ueda, Dyes Pigments 65 (2005) 67–74. 52 (2007) 1246–1249.
[634] S. Sawamura, N. Egoshi, Y. Setoguchi, H. Matsuo, Fluid Phase Equilib. 254 [690] D.L. Sparks, L.A. Estévez, R. Hernandez, K. Barlow, T. French, J. Chem. Eng. Data
(2007) 158–162. 53 (2008) 407–410.
[635] D. Schäfer, M. Vogt, Á.P.-S. Kamps, G. Maurer, Fluid Phase Equilib. 261 (2007) [691] P. Stringari, G. Scalabrin, D. Richon, C. Coquelet, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008)
306–312. 1167–1174.
[636] D. Schäfer, J. Xia, M. Vogt, Á.P.-S. Kamps, G. Maurer, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 [692] T.A. Strobel, C.A. Koh, E.D. Sloan Jr., Fluid Phase Equilib. 261 (2007) 382–389.
(2007) 1653–1659. [693] B. Su, X. Lv, Y. Yang, Q. Ren, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 542–544.
[637] D. Schäfer, M. Vogt, Á.P.-S. Kamps, G. Maurer, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 (2008) [694] B. Su, H. Xing, Y. Yang, Q. Ren, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1672–1674.
5112–5118. [695] B. Su, H. Xing, Q. Ren, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1705–1707.
[638] A.M. Schilderman, S. Raeissi, C.J. Peters, Fluid Phase Equilib. 260 (2007) 19–22. [696] C.S. Su, Y.P. Chen, J. Supercrit. Fluids 43 (2008) 438–446.
[639] K.A.G. Schmidt, F.-Y. Jou, A.E. Mather, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 84 (2006) 256– [697] P. Subra, C.G. Laudani, A. Vega-Gonzalez, E. Reverchon, J. Supercrit. Fluids 35
259. (2005) 95–105.
68 J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69
[698] K. Sue, T. Usami, K. Arai, H. Kasai, H. Nakanishi, T. Hiaki, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 [751] E. Vyhmeister, A.J. Muscat, D. Suleiman, L.A. Estévez, Fluid Phase Equilib. 270
(2007) 714–717. (2008) 121–128.
[699] K. Sugahara, T. Sugahara, K. Ohgaki, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 274–277. [752] B. Wang, W. Wu, J. Chen, B. Han, Z. Zhang, D. Shen, R. Zhang, J. Chem. Eng.
[700] K. Sugahara, M. Yoshida, T. Sugahara, K. Ohgaki, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) Data 50 (2005) 1153–1156.
301–304. [753] B. Wang, J. He, D. Sun, R. Zhang, B. Han, Fluid Phase Equilib. 239 (2006) 63–68.
[701] T. Sugahara, S. Murayama, S. Hashimoto, K. Ohgaki, Fluid Phase Equilib. 233 [754] J.S. Wang, J. Herman, Y. Enokida, C.M. Wai, J. Supercrit. Fluids 36 (2005)
(2005) 190–193. 98–105.
[702] T. Sugahara, T. Hara, S. Hashimoto, K. Ohgaki, Chem. Eng. Sci. 60 (2005) [755] J.S. Wang, C.M. Wai, J. Supercrit. Fluids 40 (2007) 176–182.
1783–1786. [756] L.H. Wang, Y.Y. Cheng, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1747–1749.
[703] C.Y. Sun, G.J. Chen, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 936–938. [757] M. Wang, Y. Sato, T. Iketani, S. Takishima, H. Masuoka, T. Watanabe, Y. Fuka-
[704] Y. Sun, S. Li, C. Quan, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1125–1128. sawa, Fluid Phase Equilib. 232 (2005) 1–8.
[705] R. Susilo, J.D. Lee, P. Englezos, Fluid Phase Equilib. 231 (2005) 20–26. [758] Q. Wang, H. Xu, X. Li, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 243–245.
[706] T.M. Takeuchi, P.F. Leal, R. Favareto, L. Cardozo-Filho, M.L. Corazza, P.T.V. Rosa, [759] K. Watanabe, S. Niwa, Y.H. Mori, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1672–1676.
M.A. Meireles, J. Supercrit. Fluids 43 (2008) 447–459. [760] R.D. Weinstein, J.J. Gribbin, K.R. Muske, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 226–229.
[707] S. Takeya, R. Ohmura, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1880–1883. [761] R.D. Weinstein, L.L. Grotzinger, P. Salemo, D.M. Omiatek, C.A. Bessel, J. Chem.
[708] S. Takeya, R. Ohmura, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 635–638. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 2088–2093.
[709] S. Takeya, K. Yasuda, R. Ohmura, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 531–534. [762] R.D. Weinstein, W.H. Hanlon, J.P. Donohue, M. Simeone, A. Rozich, K.R. Muske,
[710] M. Tanaka, K. Ogino, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 38 (2006) 397–401. J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 256–260.
[711] Z. Tang, Z. Du, E. Min, L. Gao, T. Jiang, B. Han, Fluid Phase Equilib. 239 (2006) [763] W.L. Weng, J.T. Chen, J.S. Chang, S.L. Chang, Fluid Phase Equilib. 248 (2006)
8–11. 168–173.
[712] D. Tapriyal, Y. Wang, R.M. Enick, J.K. Johnson, J. Crosthwaite, M.C. Thies, I.H. [764] W.L. Weng, J.T. Chen, J.S. Chang, C.H. Yang, Fluid Phase Equilib. 239 (2006)
Paik, A.D. Hamilton, J. Supercrit. Fluids 46 (2008) 252–257. 200–205.
[713] P. Théveneau, C. Coquelet, D. Richon, Fluid Phase Equilib. 249 (2006) 179–186. [765] G. Wierink, J. Roininen, P. Uusi-Kyyny, J.P. Pokki, M. Pakkanen, V. Alopaeus, J.
[714] G.H. Tian, J. Jin, Q.s. Li, Z. Zhang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 430–433. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1539–1544.
[715] G.H. Tian, J.s. Jin, J. Guo, Z. Zhang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1800–1802. [766] H.j. Wu, P. Englezos, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1811–1813.
[716] G. Tian, J. Jin, Z. Zhang, J. Guo, Fluid Phase Equilib. 251 (2007) 47–51. [767] J. Wu, J. Yin, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2247–2249.
[717] X.C. Tombokan, R.M. Aguda, D.A. Danehower, P.K. Kilpatrick, R.G. Carbonell, [768] Y. Wu, Y. Chen, T. Wu, Int. J. Refrig. 29 (2006) 328–335.
J. Supercrit. Fluids 45 (2008) 146–155. [769] S. Xia, P. Ma, Y. Guo, C. Hua, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1035–1038.
[718] D. Tomida, K. Suzuki, Y. Katou, C. Yokoyama, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) [770] X. Xie, J.S. Brown, D. Bush, C.A. Eckert, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 780–
1583–1586. 783.
[719] J.R. Trindade, A.M.A. Dias, M. Blesic, N. Pedrosa, L.P.N. Rebelo, L.F. Vega, J.A.P. [771] D. Xu, R.G. Carbonell, G.W. Roberts, D.J. Kiserow, J. Supercrit. Fluids 34 (2005)
Coutinho, I.M. Marrucho, Fluid Phase Equilib. 251 (2007) 33–40. 1–9.
[720] C.C. Tsai, H.M. Lin, M.J. Lee, Fluid Phase Equilib. 260 (2007) 287–294. [772] W. Xu, R. Zhu, Y. Tian, H. Li, H. Li, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1975–1978.
[721] C.C. Tsai, H.M. Lin, M.J. Lee, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2163–2169. [773] B. Yao, A.V. Nawaby, X. Liao, R. Burk, J. Cell. Plast. 43 (2007) 385–398.
[722] T. Tsuji, Y. Shinya, T. Hiaki, N. Itoh, Fluid Phase Equilib. 228–229 (2005) [774] M. Yarrison, K.R. Cox, W.G. Chapman, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006)
499–503. 6770–6777.
[723] T. Tsuji, K. Sue, T. Hiaki, N. Itoh, Fluid Phase Equilib. 257 (2007) 183–189. [775] K. Yasuda, R. Ohmura, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2182–2188.
[724] T. Tsukahara, Y. Kachi, Y. Kayaki, T. Ikariya, Y. Ikeda, J. Supercrit. Fluids 39 [776] M. Yasumoto, Y. Uchida, K. Ochi, T. Furuya, K. Otake, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50
(2006) 6–12. (2005) 596–602.
[725] F. Tumakaka, G. Sadowski, H. Latz, M. Buback, J. Supercrit. Fluids 41 (2007) [777] M. Yasumoto, Y. Uchida, K. Ochi, T. Furuya, A. Shono, K. Otake, J. Chem. Eng.
461–471. Data 52 (2007) 1726–1728.
[726] D.J. Turner, R.S. Cherry, E.D. Sloan Jr., Fluid Phase Equilib. 228–229 (2005) [778] S. Yoda, Y. Mizuno, T. Furuya, Y. Takebayashi, K. Otake, T. Tsuji, T. Hiaki, J.
505–510. Supercrit. Fluids 44 (2008) 139–147.
[727] H. Uchida, M. Yoshida, Y. Kojima, Y. Yamazoe, M. Matsuoka, J. Chem. Eng. Data [779] A. Yokozeki, M.B. Shiflett, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 1605–1610.
50 (2005) 11–15. [780] A. Yokozeki, M.B. Shiflett, C.P. Junk, L.M. Grieco, T. Foo, J. Phys. Chem. B 112
[728] V. Uribe-Vargas, A. Trejo, Fluid Phase Equilib. 238 (2005) 95–105. (2008) 16654–16663.
[729] N.I. Uzun, M. Akgun, N. Baran, S. Deniz, S. Dincer, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) [781] J. Yu, S. Wang, Y. Tian, Fluid Phase Equilib. 246 (2006) 6–14.
1144–1147. [782] X. Yuan, S. Zhang, Y. Chen, X. Lu, W. Dai, R. Mori, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006)
[730] S. Üzer, U. Akman, Ö. Hortacsu, J. Supercrit. Fluids 38 (2006) 119–128. 645–647.
[731] A. Valtz, L. Gicquel, C. Coquelet, D. Richon, Fluid Phase Equilib. 230 (2005) [783] X. Yuan, S. Zhang, J. Liu, X. Lu, Fluid Phase Equilib. 257 (2007) 195–200.
184–191. [784] Y. Yun, J. Im, H. Kim, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 40 (2008) 766–769.
[732] A. Valtz, C. Coquelet, D. Richon, Thermochim. Acta 443 (2006) 245–250. [785] Y. Yun, J. Im, M.S. Shin, Y.W. Lee, H. Kim, Fluid Phase Equilib. 271 (2008) 34–37.
[733] A. Valtz, C. Coquelet, D. Richon, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 39 (2007) 426–432. [786] Y. Yun, S. Min, J. Im, H. Kim, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2675–2678.
[734] A. Valtz, C. Coquelet, D. Richon, Fluid Phase Equilib. 258 (2007) 179–185. [787] S. Yunhai, L. Honglai, W. Kun, X. Wende, H. Ying, Fluid Phase Equilib. 234
[735] M.A. van Schilt, R.M. Wering, W.J. van Meerendonk, M.F. Kemmere, J.T.F. (2005) 1–10.
Keurentjes, M. Kleiner, G. Sadowski, T.W. de Loos, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 [788] L. Zevnik, J. Levec, J. Supercrit. Fluids 41 (2007) 335–342.
(2005) 3363–3366. [789] J.S. Zhang, S. Lee, J.W. Lee, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 2480–2483.
[736] M.A. van Schilt, R.M. Wering, M.F. Kemmere, T.W. de Loos, J.T.F. Keurentjes, J. [790] J.S. Zhang, S. Lee, J.W. Lee, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1321–1324.
Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1879–1882. [791] J.S. Zhang, S. Lee, J.W. Lee, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2002.
[737] A. Vatanara, A.R. Najafabadi, M. Khajeh, Y. Yamini, J. Supercrit. Fluids 33 (2005) [792] J. Zhang, L. Gao, X. Zhang, B. Zong, T. Jiang, B. Han, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005)
21–25. 1818–1822.
[738] M.J. Venter, P. Willems, S. Kareth, E. Weidner, N.J.M. Kuipers, A.B. de Haan, J. [793] L.W. Zhang, G.J. Chen, C.Y. Sun, S.S. Fan, Y.M. Ding, X.L. Wang, L.Y. Yang, Chem.
Supercrit. Fluids 41 (2007) 195–203. Eng. Sci. 60 (2005) 5356–5362.
[739] S.P.M. Ventura, J. Pauly, J.L. Daridon, I.M. Marrucho, A.M.A. Dias, J.A.P. [794] L.W. Zhang, G.J. Chen, C.Y. Sun, Y.M. Ding, L.Y. Yang, Fluid Phase Equilib. 245
Coutinho, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 1100–1102. (2006) 134–139.
[740] S.P.M. Ventura, J. Pauly, J.L. Daridon, J.A. Lopes da Silva, I.M. Marrucho, A.M.A. [795] L.W. Zhang, Q. Huang, C.Y. Sun, Q.L. Ma, G.J. Chen, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006)
Dias, J.A.P. Coutinho, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 40 (2008) 1187–1192. 419–422.
[741] S.P. Verevkin, S.A. Kozlova, V.N. Emel’yanenko, E.D. Nikitin, A.P. Popov, E.L. [796] Q. Zhang, G.J. Chen, Q. Huang, C.Y. Sun, X.Q. Guo, Q.L. Ma, J. Chem. Eng. Data
Krasnykh, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1896–1905. 50 (2005) 234–236.
[742] K. Vezzu, A. Bertucco, F.P. Lucien, AICHE J. 54 (2008) 2487–2494. [797] R. Zhang, Z. Qin, G. Wang, M. Dong, X. Hou, J. Wang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50
[743] O. Visuri, P. Uusi-Kyyny, J.P. Pokki, M. Pakkanen, V. Alopaeus, J. Chem. Eng. (2005) 1414–1418.
Data 53 (2008) 1829–1835. [798] S. Zhang, X. Yuan, Y. Chen, X. Zhang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 1582–1585.
[744] S. Vitu, J.-N. Jaubert, J. Pauly, J.L. Daridon, D. Barth, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) [799] S. Zhang, Y. Chen, R.X.F. Ren, Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Chem. Eng. Data
1851–1855. 50 (2005) 230–233.
[745] S. Vitu, J.-N. Jaubert, J. Pauly, J.L. Daridon, D. Barth, J. Supercrit. Fluids 44 (2008) [800] W. Zhang, E. Kiran, J. Supercrit. Fluids 38 (2006) 406–419.
155–163. [801] W. Zhang, E. Kiran, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 38 (2006) 504.
[746] S. Vitu, J.-N. Jaubert, J. Pauly, J.L. Daridon, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 40 (2008) [802] X.C. Zhang, Z.P. Liu, W.C. Wang, AICHE J. 54 (2008) 2717–2728.
1358–1363. [803] Y. Zhang, G.D. Holder, R.P. Warzinski, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 (2008) 459–469.
[747] N. von Solms, A. Rubin, S.I. Andersen, E.H. Stenby, Int. J. Thermophys. 26 (2005) [804] Y. Zhang, M. Gong, H. Zhu, J. Wu, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 2074–2076.
115–125. [805] Y. Zhang, M. Gong, H. Zhu, J. Wu, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1411–1414.
[748] D.M. VonNiederhausern, G.M. Wilson, N.F. Giles, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) [806] Y. Zhang, M. Gong, H. Zhu, J. Wu, Fluid Phase Equilib. 240 (2006) 73–78.
1990–1995. [807] Z. Zhang, W.m. Li, J.s. Jin, G.H. Tian, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 600–602.
[749] D.M. VonNiederhausern, G.M. Wilson, N.F. Giles, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) [808] Z. Zhang, W. Wu, B. Wang, J. Chen, D. Shen, B. Han, J. Supercrit. Fluids 40 (2007)
1986–1989. 1–6.
[750] V.P. Voronov, E.E. Gorodetskii, S.S. Safonov, J. Phys. Chem. B 111 (2007) [809] P.V. Zhelezny, V.P. Zhelezny, D.A. Procenko, S.N. Ancherbak, Int. J. Refrig. 30
11486–11496. (2007) 433–445.
J.M.S. Fonseca et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 300 (2011) 1–69 69
[810] V.P. Zhelezny, Y. Semenyuk, S.N. Ancherbak, A.J. Grebenkov, O.V. Beliayeva, J. [819] F.C. Fourie, C.E. Schwarz, J.H. Knoetze, J. Supercrit. Fluids 47 (2008) 161–
Fluorine Chem. 128 (2007) 1029–1038. 167.
[811] J. Zhou, P. Patil, S. Ejaz, M. Atilhan, J.C. Holste, K.R. Hall, J. Chem. Thermodyn. [820] A. Ferri, M. Banchero, L. Manna, S. Sicardi, J. Supercrit. Fluids 37 (2006)
38 (2006) 1489–1494. 107–114.
[812] R. Zhou, S. Li, T. Liu, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 2679–2682. [821] A. Chapoy, C. Coquelet, D. Richon, Fluid Phase Equilib. 214 (2003) 101–117.
[813] Z. Zhou, Z. Cheng, D. Yang, X. Zhou, W. Yuan, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) [822] S. Glos, R. Kleinrahm, W. Wagner, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 36 (2004) 1037–
972–976. 1059.
[814] C. Zhu, X. Wu, D. Zheng, W. He, S. Jing, Fluid Phase Equilib. 264 (2008) 259–263. [823] Á.P.-S. Kamps, D. Tuma, J. Xia, G. Maurer, J. Chem. Eng. Data 48 (2003) 746–749.
[815] H. Zhu, M. Gong, Y. Zhang, J. Wu, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 1201–1204. [824] G. Levitin, D. Bush, C.A. Eckert, D.W. Hess, J. Chem. Eng. Data 49 (2004)
[816] H. Zhu, M. Gong, Y. Zhang, J. Wu, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 463–467. 599–606.
[817] A. Zúñiga-Moreno, L.A. Galicia-Luna, L.E. Camacho-Camacho, Fluid Phase [825] W. Zhang, E. Kiran, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 35 (2003) 605–624.
Equilib. 234 (2005) 151–163. [826] W. Ren, A.M. Scurto, Rev. Sci. Instrum. (2008) 029901.
[818] G. Zwolak, L. Lioe, F.P. Lucien, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005) 1021–1026. [827] X. Han, G. Chen, X. Cui, Q. Wang, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2008) 1046.