You are on page 1of 1

MTRCB vs. ABS-CBN, et al.

, January 17, 2005

Facts: television programs”. Thus, when the law says


“all television programs,” the word “all” covers
 On October 15, 1991, at 10:45 in the all television programs, whether religious, public
evening, respondent ABS-CBN aired affairs, news documentary, etc. The principle
"Prostituition, " an episode of the assumes that the legislative body made no
television (TV) program "The Inside qualification in the use of general word or
Story . It depicted female students expression. It then follows that since “The
moonlighting as prostitutes to enable Inside Story” is a television program, it is within
them to pay for their tuition fees. In the the jurisdiction of the MTRCB over which it has
course of the program, student power of review. The only exceptions from the
prostitutes, pimps, customers, and some MTRCB's power of review are those expressly
faculty members were interviewed. The mentioned in Section 7 of P.D. No. 1986, such
Philippine Women's University (PWU) as (1) television programs imprinted or exhibited
was named as the school of some of the by the Philippine Government and/or its
students involved. departments and agencies, and (2) newsreels.
 It caused uproar in the PWU community. Respondent cannot invoke Iglesia ni Cristo case
Complainants alleged that the episode because it sought exception from petitioner's
besmirched the name of the PWU and review power contending that the term
resulted in the harassment of some "television programs" under Sec. 3(b) does not
of its female students. include "religious programs" which are protected
 Respondents explained that the "The under Section 5, Article III of the Constitution.
Inside Story" is a "public
It then follows that since "The Inside Story" is a
affairs program, news documentary and
television program, it is within the jurisdiction of
socio-political editorial," the airing of
the MTRCB over which it has power of review.
which is protected by the constitutional
provision on freedom of expression and
of the press.
 MTRCB Investigating Committee Case summary: Respondent aired a program
rendered that all subsequent programs about female student as prostitute to enable
of the 'The Inside Story' and all other them to pay their tuition showing the PWU in
programs of the ABS-CBN Channel 2 of the background. Besmirched by it, PWU
the same category shall be submitted to complained against the program through
the Board of Review and Approval MTRCB. The latter render a decision to review
before showing. all programs of the respondent prior to its airing.
Respondent invokes that it is a violation of
freedom of expression. Court favors petitioner
Issue: whether or not the MTRCB has the citing P.D. No. 1986.
power or authority to review the "The Inside
Story" prior to its exhibition or broadcast by
television.

Ruling:

Yes. P.D. No. 1986 gives petitioner “the power


to screen, review and examine “all television
programs,” emphasizing the phrase “all

You might also like