You are on page 1of 18

Integrations of Business Function

by MANVIR SINGH .

Submission date: 23-Aug-2019 11:52PM (UTC+0100)


Submission ID: 110241835
File name: Integrations_of_Business_Function_24250_1714392650.docx (218.79K)
Word count: 3199
Character count: 17689
Integrations of Business Function
ORIGINALITY REPORT

25 %
SIMILARITY INDEX
10%
INTERNET SOURCES
0%
PUBLICATIONS
22%
STUDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

1
Submitted to Coventry University
Student Paper 3%
2
www.britannica.com
Internet Source 3%
3
Submitted to London School of Business and
Management
2%
Student Paper

4
spearpoint101.wordpress.com
Internet Source 2%
5
Submitted to The University of the West of
Scotland
2%
Student Paper

6
Submitted to Abacus Institute of Studies
Student Paper 1%
7
fernfortuniversity.com
Internet Source 1%
8
www.coca-cola.co.uk
Internet Source 1%
9
Submitted to Global Banking Training
Student Paper 1%
10
www.secinfo.com
Internet Source 1%
11
Submitted to Australian Institute of Business
Student Paper 1%
12
Submitted to Macquarie University
Student Paper 1%
13
Submitted to Intercollege
Student Paper 1%
14
Submitted to Broward Community College
Student Paper 1%
15
Submitted to Imperial College of New Zealand
Student Paper 1%
16
Submitted to London School of Marketing
Student Paper 1%
17
www.opfine.com
Internet Source <1%
18
Submitted to University of Glamorgan
Student Paper <1%
19
Submitted to Strayer University
Student Paper <1%
20
Submitted to Association of Business
Executives
Student Paper <1%
21
www.slideshare.net
Internet Source <1%
22
Submitted to Roosevelt University
Student Paper <1%
23
Submitted to Hoa Sen University
Student Paper <1%
24
Submitted to Lebanese International University
Student Paper <1%
25
Submitted to Anglia Ruskin University
Student Paper <1%
26
Submitted to Southern New Hampshire
University - Continuing Education
<1%
Student Paper

Exclude quotes On Exclude matches Off


Exclude bibliography On
Integrations of Business Function
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

47
Choice of organisation: 2/5

As a popular choice for analysis, this introduction


of Coca-Cola was acceptable but not well justified.

/100 Discussion on leadership, time frame and changes


and how they have influenced the organisation:
6/15

The discussion of the timeline and changes could have


been more logical and better linked to the leadership
changes and its influences, if appropriate.

Application of concepts/theories /models.


Reflection and critique of concepts/theories/models
and application to: 27.5/50

Coca-Cola's organisational structure and culture were


discussed but lacking clarity and relevant theories.

The PESTEL, SWOT and Porter analyses were


reasonably well presented.

Discussion regarding role of business functions:


7.5/20

Although the marketing function was presented, its


strategic role was not addressed.

There should have been discussions about other key


functions as well.

Report Structure and referencing: 4/10


The report structure was not organised with the lack
of page and section numberings.

Other than 2 in-text citations, the rest were missing.

The references were not arranged in alphabetical


order.

Total Mark: 47%

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

PAGE 4

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

PAGE 10

PAGE 11

PAGE 12

You might also like