Professional Documents
Culture Documents
21/12/2016
LÍNGUA
INGLESA
1. Mr Trump is indeed unpredictable. Since the election he has signalled a contempt for climate science by appointing a
climate-change denier, Myron Ebell, to plan his takeover of the EPA, through which Mr Obama, in the absence of
congressional support for environmental law-making, has issued much new green regulation. In the New York Times
interview, however, Mr Trump suggested that he accepted the reality of anthropogenic warming and might not seek to
withdraw from the Paris accord. He has now taken just about every position on climate change imaginable. As well as calling
it a hoax—by the Chinese, with the aim of harming American manufacturing—he has said the world is warming but humans
have nothing to do with it, that human activity plays a “minor” role in warming, donated money to a group lobbying for action to
avert climate change and, in 2009, signed a public letter calling for cuts to America’s emissions, thereby creating “new energy
jobs”. [The Economist, 26/11/2016]
2. “Not just leadership and motivation would be in shorter supply, but also money for green schemes. By 2020, $100bn a year
is supposed to be available, most of it for cutting greenhouse-gas emissions and the rest for helping countries to adapt to
climate change. Rich countries are supposed to pay almost all of it; the rest of them may balk if America fails to do its bit.”
[The Economist, 26/11/2016]
3. “But some think large transfers from rich countries to poor ones are in any case becoming less important to international
environmental efforts. Droughts, heatwaves and other extreme events are already more likely because of global warming, and
the link between climate change and such disasters is becoming more widely accepted. Negotiations about paying for
mitigation and adaptation efforts used to resemble talks between hostage-takers and those trying to free them, says Hal
Harvey, an energy consultant: poor countries would demand money from rich ones in return for not exploiting their own
ecosystems.” [The Economist, 26/11/2016]
4. “Some perspective is in order. Comparisons with the 1930s are fatuous. Totalitarian nationalism is extinct except in North
Korea, where the ruling family preaches a weird mixture of Marxism and racial purity, enforced with slave-labour camps for
dissidents. And perhaps you could add Eritrea, a hideous but tiny dictatorship. Nonetheless, it is clear that an exclusive, often
ethnically based, form of nationalism is on the march. In rich democracies, it is a potent vote-winner. In autocracies, rulers
espouse it to distract people from their lack of freedom and, sometimes, food. The question is: where is it surging, and why?
[The Economist, 19/11/2016]
5. “Britain’s vote in June to leave the EU was also the result of a nationalist turn. Campaign posters for “Brexit” depicted
hordes of Middle Eastern migrants clamouring to come in. Activists railed against bankers, migrants and rootless experts; one
of their slogans was “We want our country back”. After the vote David Cameron, a cosmopolitan prime minister, resigned and
was replaced by Theresa May, who says: ‘If you believe you’re a citizen of the world, you’re a citizen of nowhere. You don’t
understand what the very word ‘citizenship’ means.’” [The Economist, 19/11/2016]
6. “It is troubling, then, how many countries are shifting from the universal, civic nationalism towards the blood-and-soil, ethnic
sort. As positive patriotism warps into negative nationalism, solidarity is mutating into distrust of minorities, who are present in
growing numbers (see chart 1). A benign love of one’s country—the spirit that impels Americans to salute the Stars and
Stripes, Nigerians to cheer the Super Eagles and Britons to buy Duchess of Cambridge teacups—is being replaced by an
urge to look on the world with mistrust.” [The Economist, 19/11/2016]
8. “Over the past decade, NGOs and their memberships have grown hugely. Although organisations like these have existed
for generations (in the early 1800s, the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society played a powerful part in abolishing slavery
laws), the social and economic shifts of this decade have given them new life. The end of communism, the spread of
democracy in poor countries, technological change and economic integration—globalisation, in short—have created fertile soil
for the rise of NGOs. Globalisation itself has exacerbated a host of worries: over the environment, labour rights, human rights,
consumer rights and so on. Democratisation and technological progress have revolutionised the way in which citizens can
unite to express their disquiet.” [The Economist, 09/12/1999]
9. “In 2009 efforts to revive the Doha round at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) will fail. The European Union—the
foremost champion of international governance—will be unable to revive its moribund Lisbon treaty. The Nuclear Non-
Proliferation Treaty will come under further pressure. The International Criminal Court will fail to make progress with its most
high-profile prosecutions. The United Nations will continue to lose prestige, as it suffers from the combination of a weak
secretary-general and a deadlocked Security Council. And to round the year off, the attempt to achieve a global climate-
change agreement will fail at a mega-summit in Copenhagen.” [The Economist, 19/11/2008]
10. “The most glaring source of global scepticism towards American affection for international law can be summed up in one
word: Iraq. America's 2003 decision to invade Iraq without any clear authorisation from the UN Security Council is a black
mark, not least because the war's legacy remains so fraught. At the Nuclear Security Summit in The Hague in March, Mr
Obama called Russia's annexation of Crimea a threat to the global order; when he tried to contrast Russian behaviour to that
of America in Iraq, I noticed an audible groan run through the room. The differences between Iraq and Crimea are real
enough, but America simply lacks the credibility to make this case.” [The Economist, 23/05/2014]
13.
A. R B. W C. W D. W
14.
A. R B. R C. W D. R
15.
A. W B. W C. R D. W
16.
A. R B. R C. R D. W
17.
A
18.
C
19.
A. R B. W C. W D. R
20.
21.
A. R B. W C. R D. R
1) B
2) A
3) C
4) B
5) C
6) B
7) C
8) C
9) C
10) A
11) C
12) A
13) B
14) A
15) A
16) A
17) A
18) AS A CONSEQUENCE
19) IN ORDER TO
20) DUE TO
21) ON ACCOUNT OF
22) AS A RESULT OF
23) When the Leave campaign talks of scrapping rules, they may well mean regulations that protect workers; something they
don’t mention for fear of alienating their working-class support.
24) In fact, so strong was the culture that the two men even put together an internally published list of things that should not
change when Mr. Brabeck took the reins.
25) Reformists in China have long argued that the party should be more open about what happened in order that lessons be
learned from the near civil war it led to.
26) Economic growth will remain relatively weak owing to policy and political uncertainties as well as an adverse external
context.
27) An obvious way [...] bust. In order not to stifle legitimate restructuring, plans can be submitted to the regulator for
clearance.
1. STRONGLY
2. GRIM
3. STEADY
4. GREAT
5. READY
6. MAKE
24. A. R B. W C. W D. R
25. A
26. A. W B. R C. R D. R
27. A. R B. W C. R D. R
28. A. R B. W C. R D. R
29. A. R B. W C. W D. W
1) D
2) A
3) B
4) A
5) B
6) B
7) A
8) A
9) B
10) A
11) A
12) D
13) A
14) C
15) A [STATIONARY/REBUILDING]
16) A
17) B
18) B
19) A
20) B
21) B
1. HOTLY
2. WHOLEHEARTEDLY
3. STRICTLY
4. VIVIDLY
5. ACCURATELY
6. DELIBERATELY
7. METICULOUSLY
8. VERBATIM
9. CONTENTIOUS
10. IMPARTIAL
11. BLURRED
12. AS
13. INCULCATED
14. IMBUED
15. UNDER
16. SEEK/FIND/GAIN
17. UNDERWENT
18. PROMINENTLY
19. IN
20. WATERED DOWN
PART II.
23. A. W B. W C. R D. R
24. A. R B. W C. W D. W
25. A. W (“THE SHOW”) B. R C. W (“THIS OPPOSITION”) D. ANULADA (MAIS DE UM PRONOME “IT”)
26. A. R B. R C. W D. R
27. A. R B. R C. W D. W
28. A. R B. W C. R D. R
1. B
2. A
3. A
4. C
5. C
6. A&C
7. A
8. B
9. C
10. B
Uma hipótese sobre a origem da tuberculose do Novo Mundo é que os primeiros americanos trouxeram realmente
uma versão da doença com eles, mas que a cepa*/estirpe/variedade era tão branda que foi posteriormente
suplantada pela forma virulenta endêmica na Europa. Os doutores Stone e Krause rapidamente desacreditaram
essa ideia. Suas amostras guardam pouca semelhança com outras cepas/estirpes/variedades humanas. Eles têm,
no entanto, 76 mutações que correspondem àquelas encontradas em uma forma de tuberculose que
infecta/contamina* focas e leões marinhos. Isto encaixa bem com a constatação de que a maioria das provas/dos
indícios de tuberculose na América pré-Colombiana parecem, como estes três esqueletos, vir das costas do Peru
e do norte do Chile, onde focas são abundantes/existem em grandes quantidades e eram caçadas pelos nativos.
Onde as próprias focas contraíram/”pegaram”/”apanharam”** tuberculose ainda não foi determinado. A
cepa/estirpe desses animais se assemelha a uma encontrada em camundongos/ratos, e infecção cruzada direta
entre roedores avessos à água e pinípedes aquáticos parece improvável. Mas não, talvez, impossível. Focas
sofrem muito de outra infecção terrestre que veio de outra espécie/outra infecção terrestre de transmissão inter-
espécies: a cinomose canina. Realmente, os caminhos das doenças são intrincados/complicados.
*melhor tradução
**opções mais coloquiais
22. Então este é um golpe de sorte em vias de formação para fabricantes de vacinas? No curto prazo, a resposta
é sim, especialmente porque governo estão injetando dinheiro*/distribuindo largas somas de dinheiro para os
produtores de vacinas para estimular uma expansão de capacidade. Isto é especialmente verdade nos EUA, que
não são um enorme/imenso/gigantesco importador líquido de vacinas. Isto deixa em alerta os profissionais de
saúde norte-americanos, porque governos tipicamente forçam estes fabricantes a vender toda a sua produção
internamente/no mercado doméstico em tempos de crise.
*melhor tradução
11. Chegamos de fato ao fim da história? Há, em outras palavras, “contradições” fundamentais na vida humana
que não podem ser resolvidas no contexto do liberalismo moderno que seriam solucionáveis por uma estrutura
político-econômica alternativa? Se aceitarmos as premissas idealistas acima enunciadas*/dispostas/expressas,
devemos buscar uma resposta para esta questão no domínio da ideologia e da consciência. Nossa tarefa/função
não é responder exaustivamente aos desafios ao liberalismo promovidos por cada messias excêntrico ao redor do
mundo, mas apenas àqueles que estão incorporados*/consubstanciados em forças e movimentos sociais e
políticos importantes e que não são, portanto, parte da história mundial. Para os nossos objetivos, importa muito
pouco quais pensamentos estranhos ocorrem a pessoas na Albânia ou em Burkina Faso, pois estamos
interessados no que se poderia em certo sentido chamar herança ideológica comum da humanidade.
12. Eu nunca teria imaginado que leria um ensaio de Francis Fukuyama 20 anos depois sobre a atual direção da
história mundial, e concordaria veementemente com cada palavra do mesmo. O artigo de Fukuyama no Financial
Times de ontem, intitulado ‘Democracia dos Estados Unidos tem pouco a ensinar à China’*, é brilhante. Não é a
primeira vez que alguém expressa essas ideias, mas Fukuyama as combina**/as agrupa de uma forma que está
perto da perfeição. Conforme ele escreve, a América ‘conseguiu dissipar’ o imenso capital moral que possuía em
2000 com uma rapidez considerável, devido a erros de política externa como a invasão do Iraque e,
posteriormente, a crise financeira global centrada nos EUA. (Não ajudou que funcionários do Tesouro e do Banco
Central americanos, os quais meses antes estiveram repreendendo a China sobre a necessidade de diminuir o
envolvimento do Estado no setor financeiro, encontraram-se freneticamente fazendo exatamente aquilo que os
funcionários chineses faziam – canalizando**/direcionando dinheiro para empresas respaldadas pelo Estado,
intimidando grandes bancos a cortar lucros e a emprestar mais – mas com menos sucesso) Enquanto isso, a
China está voando alto, cada vez mais confiante de que não tem nada a aprender com a América.
*Neste caso, o título deve ser traduzido porque o autor comentará sobre o artigo e porque não há um uso célebre
da versão original no Brasil.
**Melhor tradução
Act of God
Adam’s ale
as patient as Job
as ugly as sin
baptism of fire
get religion
go to hell in a handbasket
God forbid
God knows
in God’s name
poverty is no sin
i Main source: https://myvocabulary.com/word-list/religion-spiritual-inspiration-vocabulary/
ii
http://www.myenglishpages.com/site_php_files/vocabulary-lesson-idioms-categories.php?category=religion