Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Literature Review
Selina Dykes
Literature Review
Adolescents’ brains are continuing to develop during this age and are vulnerable to
various stimuli that can alter this development. At this point in their life, adolescents are
experiencing not only physical changes but mental and hormonal changes as well. Children with
Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) have many difficulties with speech and social cues. A
common issue that comes with having a diagnosis like this is it can be hard for these patients to
have a social life and cultivate social skills which is crucial to develop. In this age group, being
social is a large part of growing and can be difficult for someone with a disability like autism.
“The theory behind human animal interaction (HAI) therapy is that animals are a source of non-
judgmental support and can facilitate social interaction” (Yap, Scheinberg & Williams, 2017).
This is important to utilize because the goal of animal assisted therapy is to help build new skills
for these patients during a tough judgmental time in their lives. By incorporating animals, it
allows for patients to express and practice social skills without the disturbance of being made fun
of or judged by peers. The topic of discussion in this review is whether animal assisted therapy
creates a safe environment for physical and psychosocial wellbeing and growth. “It is believed
that exercises performed on unstable surfaces (e.g., when riding a horse) stimulate the
neuromuscular control, stabilize the joints, and increase proprioception, as well as muscle control
and its coactivation” (Zaliene, Mockeviciene, Kreiviniene, Razbadauskas, Kleiva & Kirkutis,
2018). Various animals especially horses allow patients to use animal assisted therapy in order to
gain motor function as well as social aspects of skills back which can be beneficial in autistic
patients. This analysis will review three different articles in order to provide support for the
PICOT question of: In adolescent patients ages 10-19 and patients diagnosed with cerebral palsy,
LITERATURE REVIEW 3
does the use of animal-assisted therapy compared to no animal-assisted therapy increases the
Methods
When determining which articles would offer the best information regarding the
implementation of animal assisted therapy (AAT) there was certain criteria used. The first
principle used was that the article had to come from a credible source. To achieve this, a
database was used that incorporated peer-reviewed articles and journals. By applying these, the
articles chosen were valid and relevant to the specific PICOT. Other criteria applied was the
article had to be recently published meaning within the past five years. Because the healthcare
field is constantly evolving, it is imperative that only articles published within this time frame
because they can quickly become outdated. An additional standard used was the article had to
present itself as either quantitative or qualitative. This is because these types of articles provide
the necessary information with crucial evidence to support the PICOT question. Other types of
articles such as meta-analysis would not provide concrete evidence with statistics or behaviors
but rather with varying opinions of each side of the question being asked. Furthermore, the last
criteria used was the author had to be credible. This means that the authors had to have their
Synthesize of Literature
Each article chosen for the study of the AAT PICOT question had similarities when it
came to the material being displayed. The first article was titled, Therapeutic Horseback Riding
and Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. This was a quantitative article included 45
children diagnosed with an autistic disorder and a control group. Methods involved sessions with
the patients were set up to 40 hours a week and the students were provided specialized training
LITERATURE REVIEW 4
with the horses. They included interventions that targeted balance and coordination, stimulated
gross, sensory and fine motor domains as well as verbal communication. The authors concluded
that when analyzing problematic behaviors, they were greatly reduced that could be due to the
distraction of the horses occupying the student (Al-Hmouz & Arabiat, 2015). This article
supports the PICOT question because it demonstrates a different breed of animal besides a
canine. It allows for diversity and variety in the theme of “animal” assisted therapy.
Additionally, this article supports the use of animal assisted therapy and that it positively effects
Attention Span in Patients with An Acquired Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial. This
quantitative article included 22 patients that had been diagnosed with traumatic brain injuries.
They were given two therapy sessions over the period of six weeks that involved the use of
animals and how they controlled the amount of time the patient could pay attention. The authors
found that the attention span did not differ between AAT and controlled therapy sessions but had
a positive outcome of alertness and concentration. Furthermore, the results here demonstrated
that there was an improvement within a shorter study being six weeks compared to the first
article being twelve weeks (Gocheva, Hund-Georgiadis & Hediger, 2018). This supports the
PICOT because it is aiming for six months which is longer than both trials, and positive effects
Lastly, the third article was titled, The Effect of a Pet Therapy and Comparison
Intervention on Anxiety in Hospitalized Children. This quantitative article included methods that
had a control and experimental group of 42 participants where data was collected one to two
days of each week. The control group did a puzzle for ten minutes while the experimental group
LITERATURE REVIEW 5
received eight to ten-minute sessions with the animal handler team. Although the experimental
team did not find significant changes in the anxiety level between the two groups, the baseline
for each group showed significantly lower anxiety levels (Hinic, Kowalski, Holtzman & Mobus,
2019). This article supports the PICOT because the previous articles are in favor for AAT and
have shown positive effects whereas this one is not. This study determined that there were no
significant findings with the use of animals during therapy. This supports the PICOT because it
gives statistics on the opposite side of the argument. This will be helpful because it can disprove
After analyzing all three articles that contribute evidence in support of the PICOT
question, what is known is still not concrete. What is known is two articles shared that the use of
AAT did contribute positive effects to patients with autism spectrum disorders whereas one
article counteracted that but did have slight signs of improvement. It is not known how long the
use of this therapy will be needed to help improve areas of focus, however. Things that could
enhance the study would be to include more comprehensive assessments regarding specific
behaviors in children with autism. Additionally, extending the amount of sessions and length of
them could show significant positive trends in these patients because it is hard to determine
results with trials that last for a couple of weeks or sessions. Furthermore, incorporating
additional hospitals and patients would benefit the study of the PICOT because it allows for
Conclusion
It is easy for people who admire animals to advocate for the use of animal assisted
therapy, however researching the effects of this intervention carries an importance in the
LITERATURE REVIEW 6
advancement of autistic children’s social skills. Thus far, AAT has shown a significant positive
effect on these children but still has plenty of room for further research. In the three articles
discussed, the main points showed that there is a possibility that this therapy can be beneficial. It
is important for therapies to be explored because the number of children born with an ASD is not
rare so as nurses this PICOT can aid in finding therapies and interventions for these patients.
Therefore, when using animal assisted therapies in plans of care, this intervention seems to be a
References
Al-Hmouz, H., & Arabiat, A. (2015). Therapeutic horseback riding and children with autism
2020.
Gocheva, V., Hund-Georgiadis, M., & Hediger, K. (2018). Effects of animal-assisted therapy on
concentration and attention span in patients with acquired brain injury: A randomized
org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/neu0000398
Hinic, K., Kowalski, M. O., Holtzman, K., & Mobus, K. (2019). The effect of a pet therapy and
com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edo&AN=136345478&site=eds-
Yap, E., Scheinberg, A., & Williams, K. (2017). Attitudes to and beliefs about animal assisted
therapy for children with disabilities. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 26,
47–52. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.11.009
Žalienė, L., Mockevičienė, D., Kreivinienė, B., Razbadauskas, A., Kleiva, Ž., & Kirkutis, A.
(2018). Short-term and long-term effects of riding for children with cerebral palsy gross
org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1155/2018/4190249