karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules PDF

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
IMPORTANT GOVERNMENT ORDERS/

OFFICIAL MEMORANDA ETC., RELATED
TO THE KARNATAKA CIVIL SERVICES
(CCA) RULES, 1957.
From 1956 upto 9-2-2005
DPAL 44 RASAPRA 2006

IMPORTANT GOVERNMENT ORDERS/
OFFICIAL MEMORANDA ETC., RELATED
TO THE KARNATAKA CIVIL SERVICES
(CCA) RULES, 1957.
From 1956 upto 9-2-2005
DPAL 44 RASAPRA 2006

Sl. Number and date of communication Subject Page
No. No.
1 Cir. AD 19181-94 SE (AC) Procedure in Anti - Corruption cases.

5.12.1956
2 G.O. GAD 18 PHS 57 20.3.1957 Prompt transmission of appeals of

Government Servants with relevant
documents.
3 O.M. GAD (S-1) 80 RSR 57 Notifying the dismissal of Government

9.5.1957 servants.
4 O.M. OSD 2 SMR 57 Procedure for consulting the Public Service

29.6.1957 Commission in Disciplinary and other
matters.
5 G.O. RD 185-RGP 57/2023-26A Departmental enquiries-Instuctions for

17.7.1957 conducting of
6 Cir. GAD (S-1) 25 SSR 57 Anti-Corruption cases-punishment.

13.9.1957
7 O.M. GAD (OM) 9 SMR 57 Procedure for submission of

12.12.1957 representation by Government servant.
8 O.M. GAD (OM) 3 CAR 57 Procedural instructions regarding the

14.12.1957 holding of Departmental Enquiries
under the Mysore civil
Services (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules, 1957.
9 O.M. GAD (S-1) 80 RSR 57 Preparation and submission of quarterly

4.1.1958 returns of dismissed Government servants
10 O.M. GAD (S-1) 80 RSR 57 Quarterly statements of dismissals of

4.2.1958 Government Servants-forwadal of
notification.
11 Cir.GAD 11 GEI 58 30.5.1958 Confidential Records-entries
12 O.M.GAD 27 SSR 58 18.10.1958 Procedure in Disciplinary cases avoidance
of delay.
13 Cir. GAD (51) 38 SSR 58 Misappropriation of Government money-
30.10.1958 Enquiry-Procedure for.
14 ADDENDUM Criminal misconduct-Government Servants-
Procedure to be followed.
15 Cir. GAD 36 DIF (Int) 58 States Reorganisation-Provisions as to
15.11.1958 services-procedure in respect of disciplinary
matters.
16 O.M. GAD (S-1) 86 RSR 58 Disciplinary action against Government
21.11.1958 Servants.
17 Cir. GAD (S-1) 35 SSR 58 8.1.1959 Instructions regarding the Departmental
proceedings against Government servants
for misconduct.
18 O.M. GAD 6 OSR 59 Procedural instructions regarding
25.4.1959 Departmental Enquiries under the C.C.A.
Rules.
19 O.M. GAD 8 OSR 59 Supply of copies of evidence, etc. to

18.5.1959 delinquent officers.
20 O.M. GAD (S-1) 23 SSR 59 "Warning" and "Censure" Distinction

2.7.1959 between.
21 O.M. GAD (S-1) 44 SSR 59 Imposition of penalty of reduction

20.7.1959. specifying the period.
22 O.M. GAD (S-1) 56 SSR 59 Promotion of Government servants whose

9.10.1959. conduct is under enquiry.
23 O.M.6400/58-15 States Reorganisation-Appeals against

24.3.1960. orders of dismissal, removal or compulsory
retirement from service passed by the pre-
Reorganised Madras State prior to 1st
November 1956-Authority to dispose of-
Decisions of the Government of India-
Communicated.
24 O.M. GAD 49 DIF 59 Procedure in respect of Disciplinary

8.4.1960 matters.
25 G.O. GAD 21 OSR 60. 28.7.1960. Departmental enquiries-Taking the

assistance of another Government Servant
in presenting his defence.
26 O.M. GAD 35 SSR 60 15.10.1960. Dismissal of Government servants in Public

services.
27 O.M. GAD 92 SRS 60 1.12.1960 Clarification regarding Rule 59, Mysore

Civil Services Rules.
28 Cir. GAD 59 OAC 61 30.9.1961 Criminal misconduct-Government servants-
procedure to be followed.
29 O.M. GAD 12 OSR 61 Procedure to be follwed in forwarding
dt. 25.10.1961 investigation papers to the Anticorruption
Department.
30 O.M.GAD 14 OSR 61 Supply of copies of documents to the
dt. 13.11.1961 delinquent official.
31 Cir. GAD (S-1) 43 Clarification in respect of Rule 11(5) of
SRR 62, dt. 1.6.1962 K.C.S(C.C.A) Rules, 1957.
32 O.M.GAD (S-1) 33 Failure to follow the prescribed procedure
SSR 61, dt. 27.6.1962 laid down for departmental proceedings
against Government servants for
misconduct. Issue instructions reg:
33 O.M. GAD 6 SIN 62 Orders of dismissal, removal or compulsory
dt. 2.4.1963 retirement of Government servants from
service set aside by Courts-Issue
instructions for guidance of competent
authorities.
34 Cir. GAD 46 OAC 64 Requisitions for records required for
dt. 16.6.1964 purposes of investigations and inquiries by
officers of the Anti Corruption Department.
35 O.M. GAD 31 SRR 64 Instructions regarding preparation and

dt. 24.11.1964 submission of half yearly returns of
dismissed Government servants.
36 O.M. GAD 21 SSR 65 Public service-circumstances under which a

dt. 26.2.1965 Government servant may be placed under
suspension-instructions regarding.
37 O.M. GAD 105 SRR 64, Public services-Departmental proceedings

dt. 23.3.1965 against Government servants involved in
cases of fraud, embezzlement, loss of
Government money etc.,-instructions-
38 O.M. GAD 129 SRR 65 Preparation and submission of half yearly

dt. 29.12.1965 returns of dismissed/debarred Government
servants-further instructions regard-
39 O.M. GAD 171 SSR 65 Departmental enquiries under Rule 14 of

dt. 2.2.1966 the Mysore Civil Services (Classification,
Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957-
Issues clarifications reg
40 Cir. GAD 18 SSR 66 Instructions to officers to offer cooperation

dt. 2.3.1966 in giving evidence, etc., in any Enquiry by
Enquiry Officers during enquiry
proceedings under C.C.A. Rules and
Vigilance Commission Rules.
41 O.M.GAD 80 SSR 65 dt. 11.4.1966 Promotion of Government servants involved

in Departmenal Enquiries.
42 Cir. ED 34 RPS 67 Letter No. G 6598 dated 15.12.1996 from

dt. 27.4.1967 the Compiler, Mysore Gazette.
43 O.M. GAD 42 PVC 66 Stipulation of time limit for completing the

dt. 5.8.1967 Departmental Enquiry entrusted by
Government to the State Vegilance
Commission.
44 Letter GAD 54 SRR 67 Continuance of Departmental Proceedings
dt. 14/16.9.1967 after retirement, Application of new Rule
214 of Mysore Civil Services Rules.
45 O.M. FD 133 SRS 67 Withholding/withdrawal of pension under
dt. 3.1.1968 Rule 214 of the Mysore Civil Services
Rules.
46 O.M. GAD 25 SSR 68 Procedure in disciplinary cases-
dt. 26.6.1968 withholding of increments.
47 O.M. GAD 47 SSR 68 Publication of notices in respect of

dt. 17.9.1968 Departmental proceedings against
Government servants.
48 O.M. GAD 57 PVC 68 Disposal of cases received from the State

dt. 18.10.1968 Vigilance Commission - stipulation of time
limit.
49 O.M. GAD 47 SSR 68 Publication of notices, etc. in respect of
dt. 8.1.1969 departmental proceedings against
Government servants
50 O.M. GAD 7 SSR 69 Penalty of reduction-specifying the period

dt. 25.3.1969
51 O.M. GAD 57 PVC 68 Disposal of cases received from the Bureau
7.6.1969 of Investigation of the Vigilance
Commission stipulation of time limit.
52 O.M. GAD 42 SSR 69 Bar for promotions during the period of
dt. 25.8.1969 penalty.
53 O.M. GAD 26 SSR 72 Departmental Enquiries-failure to follow the

dt. 23.6.1972 prescribed procedure.
54 Cir. GAD 29 SSR 72 State Vigilance Commission Nature of

dt. 4.8.1972 cases in which investigations and inquiries
are to be entrusted to it.
55 O.M. GAD 1 SSR 73 Government servants involved in the

dt. 9.2.1973 Departmental enquiries taking assistance of
other Government servant.
56 O.M. GAD 18 SSR 73 Withholding of increment (s) with

dt. 2.11.1973 cumulative effect-procedure to be followed
in imposing the penalty of.
57 G.O. GAD 4 SSR 74 Departmental Enquiry Proceedings

dt. 3.4.1974 sanctions remuneration to the presenting
officers appointed in the –
58 O.M. GAD 12 SSR 74 Withholding of increment (s) with
dt. 2.5.1974 cumulative effect-procedure to be followed
in imposing the penalty of -
59 Cir. GAD 47 PVC 74 Requisitions for records, reports, etc.,
dt. 1.7.1974 required for purpose of investigations and
inquiries by the officers of the Vigilance
Commission
60 Cir. GAD 42 PVC 74 Submission of reports of the Vigilance
dt. 15.7.1974 Commission-pendency in the Secretariat.
61 Cir. GAD 57 PVC 74 Issue of instructions to Heads of
dt. 16.9.1974 Department etc., regarding assistance of
officials of other Departments to the
Vigilance Commission.
62 O.M. GAD 63 SSR 74 Delay in initiating action against
dt. 3.12.1974 Government servants in cases investigated
by Vigilance Commission.
63 G.O. GAD 6 SSR 75 Procedure for drawing remuneration by the

dt. 31.3.1975 presenting officer appointed in the
Departmental inquiry proceedings.
64 Cir. GAD 14 SSR 75 Instructions regarding Disciplinary

dt. 21.5.1975 Proceedings against Government servants
under Rule 12 of the K.S.C.S. (C.C.A)
Rules, 1957.
65 D.O. GAD 23 IPN 75 Cases of Vigilance Commission

dt. 17.6.1975 pending with Government Review of.
66 O.M. FD 213 SRS 71 Rule 59 of the Karnataka Civil Services

dt. 20.10.1975 Rules - clarification regarding.
67 No. GAD 24 SSR 75, Powers of Deputy Commissioners inrespect

dt. 11.12.1975 of class - III & Class IV posts U/r 10.
68 O.M. GAD 2 SSR 76 Appeal petitions/Review petitions to the

dt. 15.3.1976 Governor Disposal of - Procedure to be
followed in respect of.
69 Cir. DPAR 70 SSR 76 Karnataka Civil Services (Classification,

dt. 29.1.1977 Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 -
Amendments of rule 11-A, 25 and 26 of the
- clarifies the position under the –
70 O.M. DPAR 18 SSR 77, Disciplinary proceedings against

dt. 23.5.1977 Government servants.
71 O.M. DPAR 11 SSR 77 Suspension of Government servants

dt. 5.7.1977 involved in mis-appropriation cases etc., -
Re vocation of instructions regarding.
72 Cir. DPAR 28 SSR 77 Clarification regarding 'mis-appropriation'

dt. 28.7.1977 by a Government servant amounts to
corruption.
73 Cir. DCA 16 ARB 77 Vigilance Commission - Reference of -
dt. 24.11.1977 Complaints, Allegations against the
gazetted officers to the by Heads of
Departments clarification regarding.
74 Cir. DPAR 24 SSR 78 Imposition of penalty of withholding of

dt. 14.7.1978 increments and reduction to lower stages in
time scale of pay or to a lower post etc-
instructions reg.
75 Cir. DPAR 24 SSR 77 Suspension of Government officials
dt. 16.8.1978
76 O.M. FD 17 SRS 78 Instructions under Rule 59 of the Karnataka
dt. 28.9.1978 Civil Services Rules-Further clarification
regarding.
77 Note Note on the procedure to be followed at the
Secretariat level in handling cases coming
under Rule 14-A of the K.C.S
(Classification Control and Appeal) Rules,
1957.
78 Cir. DPAR 22 SSR 78 Clarification regarding suspension of
dt. 29.12.1978 Government servants.
79 Cir. DPAR 18 SSR 79 Departmental enquiries-cases to be referred

dt. 2.3.1979 to Chief Secretary Procedure, regarding.
80 Cir. DPAR 30 SSR 79 Un-authorised absence of Government

dt. 17.4.1979 servants, instructions regarding quick
disposal of enquiry cases.
81 Cir. DPAR 46 SSR 79 Appointment of Presenting Officers in

dt. 28.6.1979 Disciplinary cases under the C.C.A Rules.
82 Cir. DPAR 2 SIN 79 Communications to be addressed to the

dt. 4.7.1979 Vigilance Commission-Instruction -reg.
83 Cir. DPAR 71 PVC 78 Reinstatement of Government servants

dt. 17.7.1979 placed under suspension at the request of
the State Vigilance Commission.
84 Cir. DPAR 56 SSR 78 Karnataka Civil Services (Classification,

dt. 16.8.1979 Control & Appeal) Rules, 1957 -
Amendment of Rule 11-A-further
clarification in respect of issue of Second
Show Cause Notice.
85 Cir. DPAR 80 SSR 79 Clarification regarding sanction of

dt. 14.3.1980 Government for payment of subsistence
allowance for a period beyond 6 months.
86 Cir. DPAR 17 SSR 80 Avoiding unnecessary references to Govt. in

dt. 28.4.1980 initiating disciplinary proceedings.
87 Cir. DPAR 61 SSR 80 Service of order, notices etc. under Rule 28

dt. 1.10.1980 A of the K.C.S (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules, 1957.
88 Cir. DPAR 17 SSR 79 Suspension of Government servants-further

dt. 17.10.1980 instructions regarding.
89 O.M. DPAR 5 SSR 79 Departmental inquiry-Appointing Deputy
dt. 8.7.1981 Commissioners of inquiries or Assistant
Commissioners of inquiries of the
Karnataka State Vigilance Commission as
the Inquiry Officers.
90 O.M. DPAR 5 SSR 79 Departmental Inquiry Appointing Deputy
dt. 17.8.1981 Commissioners of Inquiries or Assistant
Commissioners of inquiries of the
Karnataka State Vigilance Commission as
the Inquiry Officer.
91 O.M. DPAR 96 KLU 81 Investigation/Enquiry Reports by the
dt. 29.10.1981 Karnataka State Vigilance Commission-
Prompt disposal of-instructions-reg.
92 Cir. DPAR 466 SAS 81 Issue of instructions regarding rendering of

dt. 3.11.1981 assistance by Government servants to the
Vigilance Commission in departmental
inquiries.
93 O.M. DPAR 59 SDE 81 Suspension of Government servants -

dt. 17.12.1981 Review of cases of prolonged suspension.
94 O.M. LAW 166 LAG 81 Review of Court cases.

dt. 18.12.1981
95 O.M. LAW 166 LAG 81(P) dt. Review of Judgements wherein decisions
4.3.1982. have been given by the courts against the
State.
96 Cir. DPAR 12 SDE 82 Departmental Proceedings against

dt. 13.4.1982 Government servants placed under
suspension - delay in instituting.
97 Cir. DPAR 10 SDE 82 Departmental enquiries-instructions to

dt. 19.4.1982 follow prescribed procedure.
98 Cir.DPAR 8 SDE 82 Karnataka Civil Services (Classification,

dt. 28.4.1982 Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957-
Clarification regarding second show cause
notice.
99 Cir. DPAR 8 SDE 82 Karnataka Civil Services (Classification,

dt. 17.7.1982 Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957-further
clarification regarding second show cause
notice.
100 Cir. DPAR 21 SDE 83 Review of disciplinary cases

dt. 1.6.1983 which are pending finalisation-prescription
of monthly progress report.
101 O.M. r¦JDgï 41 J¸ïrE 83, MAzÀÄ ªÀµÀðzÀ CªÀ¢üAiÉÆ¼ÀUÉ ¤ªÀøwÛ ºÉÆAzÀ°gÀÄªÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ 16.8.1983. ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ £ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ
vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼ÀÄŠEªÀÅUÀ¼À ²ÃWÀæ «¯ÉÃªÁjUÉ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
102 Cir. DPAR 55 SDE 83, Review of disciplinary cases which are
dt. 14.11.1983 pending finalisation-further instructions
regarding.
103 Cir. DPAR 8 SDE 84 Defending the cases/suits filed in Courts
dt. 14.3.1984 against Government Instructions-reg.
104 O.M. DPAR 12 SDE 83 Suspension of Government servants and
dt. 21.4.1984 their promotions pending inquiries
instructions regarding.
105 C.eÕÁ. r¦JDgï 33 J¸ïrE 83, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt
¢£ÁAPÀ 24.5.1984 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957Š¤ªÀøwÛ
DUÀ°gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É EgÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ
vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
106 O.M. DPAR 12 SDE 83 Reinstatement of Government servants
dt. 21.6.1984 placed under suspension at the request of
the State Vigilance Commission.
107 O.M. DPAR 16 SDE 84 Departmental Inquiry under rule 11 of the

dt. 2.8.1984 K.C.S (Classification, Control and Appeal)
Rules, 1957-entrusting the cases to the
officers of Karnataka State Vigilance
Commission.
108 O.M. DPAR 30 SDE 84 Joint Inquiry against Government servants

dt. 27.11.1984 under Rule 13 of the Karnataka
Civil Services (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules, 1957
109 O.M. DPAR 43 SDE 84 Review of disciplinary cases which

dt. 14.2.1985 are pending finalisation prescription of
quarterly progress report.
110 O.M. DPAR 12 SDE 83 Suspension of Government servants and
dt. 4.3.1985 their promotions pending inquiries
111 O.M. DPAR 13 SDE 85 Suspension of Government servants

dt. 3.7.1985 and their reinstatement.
112 O.M. DPAR 14 SDE 85 Withholding of special increments such as

dt. 5.7.1985 stagnation increment or increment for
passing departmental examinations as a
measure of penalty under Rule 8 of the
K.C.S (C.C.A) Rules, 1957-clarification
regarding.
113 C.eÕÁ. r¦JDgï 12 J¸ïrE 86, E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉŠ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ G¥À

¢£ÁAPÀ 22.5.1986 ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ
¹§âA¢AiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
«ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
114 C.eÕÁ. r¦JDgï 9 J¸ïrE 86, E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ°è ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ D¥Á¢vÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ 5.6.1986 £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À «µÀAiÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ
CxÀªÁ zÀÄªÀðvÀð£ÉAiÀÄ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
vÀAiÀiÁj¹ MzÀV¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
115 C.eÕÁ. r¦JDgï 15 J¸ïrE 86, E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ°è ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ 1.7.1986 PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀjAiÀiÁV C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¢gÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
116 C.eÕÁ. r¦JDgï 8 J¸ïrE 85, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉ:
¢£ÁAPÀ 30.12.1986 E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§Š
¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ¯ÉPÀÌ¥ÀvÀæ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄìŠ
«¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
117 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß

r¦JDgï 35 J¸ïrE 86, ¢£ÁAPÀ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
7Š1Š1987
118 C.eÕÁ. ¹D¸ÀÄE 16 ¸ÉÃE«
87, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉŠ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ G¥À
¢£ÁAPÀ 21.7.1987 ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ ¹§âA¢
AiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÁßV
£ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
119 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É r¦JDgï 25 J¸ïrE 84, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt
¢£ÁAPÀ 27.7.1987 ªÀÄvÀÛÄ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957ŠD¥Á¢vÀ
£ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ ªÀÄºÁzÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä
JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ µÉÆÃPÁ¸ï £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ï ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
¸ÀàµÀÖ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
120 C.eÕÁ. ¹D¸ÀÄE 28 ¸ÉÃE« 87, ¢£ÁAPÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt
17.9.1987 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957ŠªÀgÀzÀQëuÉ
«µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è ªÀÄgÀt ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è
M¼ÀUÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ
§UÉÎ.
121 C.eÕÁ. ¹D¸ÀÄE 32 ¸ÉÃE« 87, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è E¯ÁSÁ

¢£ÁAPÀ 26.10.1987 «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛPÉÌ ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ
§UÉÎ.
122 O.M. DPAR 16 SDE 88 Sanction for prosecution of Government

dt. 28.3.1988 servants instructions - reg.
123 C.eÕÁ. ¹D¸ÀÄE 24 ¸ÉÃE« 88, ¢ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ

6.6.1988
124 C.eÕÁ. ¹D¸ÀÄE 35 ¸ÉÃE« 88, gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼À°è ¥ÁæzÉÃ²PÀ ¥Áæw¤zsÀåvÉAiÀÄ
¢£ÁAPÀ 6.10.1988 PÀÄjvÀÄŠPÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt,
¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ,
1957gÀ C£ÀÄ§AzsÀŠ11 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 111PÉÌ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr.
125 C.eÕÁ. ¹D¸ÀÄE 4 ¸ÉÃE« 89, C£À¢üPÀøvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdgÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj

¢£ÁAPÀ 31.1.1989 £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß PÉ®¸ÀPÉÌ ªÁ¥À¸ÀÄì vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ
§UÉÎŠ¸ÀàµÀÖ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
126 C.eÕÁ. ¹ÇÀÄE 16 ¸ÉÃE« 89, ®AZÀ ¤ªÀÄÆð®£Á C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ CrAiÀÄ°è
¢£ÁAPÀ 26.6.1989 vÀ¤SÉUÉ M¼ÀUÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
127 O.M. DPAR 22 SDE 89 Revocation of suspension order on the
dt. 11.10.1989 quashing of suspension order by the Courts-
guidelines.
128 C.eÕÁ. r¦JDgï 2 J¸ïrE 90, ¤ªÀøwÛ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
¢£ÁAPÀ 22.2.1990 ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¤ªÀøwÛAiÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ
«¸ÀÛgÀuÉ PÁAiÀÄð¤ÃwAiÀÄ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï ¥Àj²Ã®£É.
129 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 6 ¸ÉÃ¯ÉÆÃAiÀÄÄ 90, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (¹¹J) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½,
¢£ÁAPÀ 21.3.1990 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 14ŠJ C£ÀéAiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
«ZÁgÀuÉUÁV PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛPÉÌ ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ
§UÉÎ ¤zÉðÃ±À£À
130 O.M. DPAR 14 SDE 90 Prompt disposal of appeal petition
dt. 16.5.1990 submitted by the Government servant
against the order of the disciplinary
authority by the appellate authority-
Instructions reg.
131 O.M. DPAR 18 SDE 90 Sanction for prosecution of Government
dt. 10.7.1990 servants instructions regarding.
132 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 6 J¸ï.r.E 91, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt
¢£ÁAPÀ 21.3.1992 ªÀÄvÀÛÄ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957ŠD¥Á¢vÀ
£ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ PÀpt zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
133 O.M. DPAR 22 SRR 93 Department Promotion Committee in
dt. 14.7.1993 respect of promotions to the State Services
in the basis of seniority-cum-merit-
Procedure when a departmental
enquiry/Court Proceedings is pending.
134 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹ÇÀÄE 12 ¸ÉÃE« 94, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt
¢£ÁAPÀ 7.12.1994 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957ŠD¥Á¢vÀ
£ËPÀgÀjUÉ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ
¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉÆlÄÖ vÀzÀ£ÀAvÀgÀ
zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
135 O.M. DPAR 3 SDE 94 Unauthorised absence of Government
dt. 26.2.1994 employees instructions to deal with such
absence.
136 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 4 J¸ïrE 95, CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß

¢£ÁAPÀ 21.2.1995 ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä EgÀÄªÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ
ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
137 C.eÕÁ. r¦JDgï 1 J¸ïrE 95, ¢£ÁAPÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ
15.3.1995 PÀÄjvÀÄ
138 C.eÕÁ. ¹D¸ÀÄE 6 ¸ÉÃE« 95, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ:¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀŠE¯ÁSÁ

¢£ÁAPÀ 16.3.1995 «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§Š«¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß
vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
139 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 17 ¸ÉÃE« 95, CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß

¢£ÁAPÀ 28.10.1995 ¥ÀÅ£Àgï «¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä EgÀÄªÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ
140 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 13 ¸ÉÃE« 95, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt
¢£ÁAPÀ 7.11.1995 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀrAiÀÄ°è
E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼ÀÄ.
141 C.eÕÁ. ¹D¸ÀÄE 16 ¸ÉÃE« 95, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß

¢£ÁAPÀ 23.11.1995 vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
142 ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¹D¸ÀÄE 9 ¸ÉÃE« 96, ¹.D.¸ÀÄ. E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ «¨sÁUÀzÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ 22.6.1996 PÁAiÀÄðªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
gÀa¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
143 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 9 ¸ÉÃE« 95, Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ M¼À¥ÀlÄÖ

¢£ÁAPÀ 26.6.1996 C¥ÀgÁzsÀPÁÌV zÀAqÀ£ÉUÉ UÀÄjAiÀiÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ
«gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆa.
144 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 7 ¸ÉÃE« 96, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä
¢£ÁAPÀ 4.7.1996 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÉ ªÀ»¹zÀ E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¤ªÀøwÛ
ªÀAiÀÄ¸Àì£ÀÄß £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
145 Cir. DPAR 4 SDE 96 Avoiding delay in initiating departmental

dt. 28.8.1996 enquiries-instructions-regarding.
146 C.eÕÁ. ¹D¸ÀÄE 1 ¸ÉÃE« 97, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt
¢£ÁAPÀ 18.2.1997 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ C£ÀÄ¸ÀÆa I,
II, III ªÀÄvÀÄÛ IV PÉÌ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr PÀÄjvÀÄ.
147 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 16 ¸ÉÃE« 96 ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¤®A§£ÉAiÀÄ°èqÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ

¢£ÁAPÀ 21.4.1997 ¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
148 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 3 ¸ÉÃE« 97 C£À¢üPÀøvÀ UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É

¢£ÁAPÀ 29.5.1997 ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
149 C.eÕÁ. ¹D¸ÀÄE 14 ¸ÉÃE« 96 ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è, £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è

¢£ÁAPÀ 31.5.1997 ºÁUÀÆ CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß
vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ºÁUÀÆ ¨ÁQ EgÀÄªÀ ²¹Û£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À
¥ÀæUÀwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï CªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ºÁUÀÆ
G¸ÀÄÛªÁj (monitoring) §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
150 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 6 ¸ÉÃE« 97 UÀÆæ¥ïŠ© ªÀUÀðzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É

¢£ÁAPÀ 2.7.1997 ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¹ zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
151 C.eÕÁ. ¹D¸ÀÄE 2 ¸ÉÃE« 97 ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ

¢£ÁAPÀ 8.7.1997
152 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 9 ¸ÉÃE« 97 E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß

¢£ÁAPÀ 11Š8Š1997 ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
153 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 8 ¸ÉÃE« 94 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt

¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š11Š1997 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ
28ŠJ gÀr DzÉÃ±À, £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ÀÄ, ªÀÄAvÁzÀªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
eÁj ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ §UÉÎ.
154 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É r¦JDgï 5 ¸ÉÃE« 96 ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼À°è Qæ«Ä£À¯ï

¢£ÁAPÀ 2Š12Š1997 ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ¨ÁQ EzÁÝUÀ CzÉÃ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É
²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ:E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
155 Cir. DPAR 17 SDE 97 Arrest of Civil Servants - regarding
dt. 9.12.1997
156 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 1 ¸ÉÃE« 98 CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ 24Š1Š1998 ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ CzsÀåPÀëvÉAiÀÄ°è gÀa¹zÀ
¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
157 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 1 ¸ÉÃE« 98 CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¢£ÁAPÀ 19Š2Š1998 ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
AiÀÄªÀgÀ CzsÀåPÀëvÉAiÀÄ°è gÀa¹zÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ
158 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 6 ¸ÉÃE«
96 ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼À°è Qæ«Ä£À¯ï
¢£ÁAPÀ 6Š4Š1998 ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ¨ÁQ EzÁÝUÀ CzÉÃ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É
²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
ªÀÄgÀÄ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
159 ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¹D¸ÀÄE 3 ¸ÉÃE« 96, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt
¢£ÁAPÀ 24Š4Š1998 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½, 1957gÀrAiÀÄ°è
ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ªÀøvÀÛ
£ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ
C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
160 C.eÕÁ. ¹D¸ÀÄE 2 ¸ÉÃE« 98 ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ

¢£ÁAPÀ 16Š7Š1998. PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä ªÀÄAdÆgÁw ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎŠªÀÄgÀÄ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
161 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 9 ¸ÉÃE« 98 E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß

¢£ÁAPÀ 22Š7Š1998 vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
162 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 9 ¸ÉÃE« 98 E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß

¢£ÁAPÀ 3.8.1998 vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
163 C.eÕÁ. ¹D¸ÀÄE 3 ¸ÉÃE« 98 Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇtð

¢£ÁAPÀ 5Š8Š1998 UÉÆ½¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, ZÁeïð¶Ãl£ÀÄß zÁR°¸ÀÄªÀ
¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ
¨Áj CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
164 C.n. ¯Á 98 J¯ïJJA 98 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt

¢£ÁAPÀ 8Š3Š1999 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀrAiÀÄ°è
ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ªÀøvÀÛ
£ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄUÀ½UÉ ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
165 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 11 ¸ÉÃE« 98 E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ°è ºÉ¸Àj¸À¯ÁzÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ

¢£ÁAPÀ 16Š3Š1999 ¸ÁQëUÀ¼ÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄAzÉ
ºÁdgÁUÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
166 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¹D¸ÀÄE 4 ¸ÉÃE« 99 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt

¢£ÁAPÀ 9Š6Š99 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ
11(4) ºÁUÀÆ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 12(1)(J) gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ
¤ÃqÀ¯ÁUÀÄªÀ £ÉÆÃnÃ¹UÉ GvÀÛj¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß
zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÉÆÃqÀ®Ä CªÀPÁ±À PÀ°à¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
167 O.M. DPAR 12 SDE 99 Engaging the services of retired Judges as

dated 23-7-99 inquiry officers in Departmental
Proceedings.
168 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå ¹D¸ÀÄE 17 ¸ÉÃE« 99,

C£À¢üPÀøvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdgÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ 9Š12Š1999 ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀåªÀºÀj¸ÀÄªÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
169 DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 15 ¸ÁE« 99 E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À°è ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV
¢£ÁAPÀ 14Š3Š2000 £ÉÃ«Ä¸À¯ÁUÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ
¤ÃqÀ¯ÁUÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ UËgÀªÀzsÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉaÑ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
170 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 8 ¸ÉÃE« Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ M¼À¥ÀlÖ
2001Š1 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 29.8.2000 C¥ÀgÁzsÀPÁÌV zÀAqÀ£ÉUÉ UÀÄjAiÀiÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ
«gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆa
171 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 8 ¸ÉÃE« ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ «¢ü¹zÀ
2000ŠII ¢£ÁAPÀ: 29.8.2000 zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÉÄÃ°£À £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ
«¼ÀA§£ÉAiÀÄ°èlÖ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è CªÀgÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß
ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
172 C.eÁÕ . ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 13 ¸ÉÃE« 2000, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°èzÁÝUÀ ²¹Û£À
¢£ÁAPÀ: 9.10.2000 £ÀqÀªÀ½PÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÁægÀA©ü¹, CªÀgÀÄ ¤ªÀøvÀÛgÁzÀ
£ÀAvÀgÀ zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀqÉAiÀÄÄªÀ
§UÉÎ.
173 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 18 ¸ÉÃE« PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt
2000 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 4.11.2000 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11(2)
gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ
¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÉ ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
2000 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 2.1.2001 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 1957gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¸ÀPÀæªÀÄ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ CªÀgÀªÀjUÉ ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ
C¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
175 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 14 ¸ÉÃE« 99 ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄAiÀÄ°è
¢£ÁAPÀ: 15.1.2001 RÄ¯Á¸É ªÀiÁrzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è CªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ
E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆa
176 C.eÁÕ. ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 1 ¸ÉÃE« 2001 ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄPÁÌV ¤AiÉÆÃf¸À®àlÖ

¢£ÁAPÀ; 7.2.2001 ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¨sÁgÀvÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ
DAiÉÆÃUÀªÀÅ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ ²¹Û£À C¢üPÁgÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ
§UÉÎ
177 C.eÁÕ. ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 3 ¸ÉÃE« 2001 ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ
¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.3.2001 PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä ªÀÄAdÆgÁw ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
178 C.eÁÕ. ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 19 ¸ÉÃE« 2001 ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß
¢£ÁAPÀ: 28.6.2001 DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è, £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ°è ºÁUÀÆ
CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä
¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVgÀÄªÀ PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀuÉ PÀÄjvÀÄ
179 C.eÁÕ. ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 25 ¸ÉÃE« 2001 ¢ÃWÀðPÁ®¢AzÀ C£À¢üPÀøvÀ UÉÊgÀÄºÁdjAiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ

¢£ÁAPÀ: 1.8.2001 £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
180 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 31 ¸ÉÃE« ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ
2001 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.8.2001 PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä ªÀÄAdÆgÁw ¤ÃqÀ®Ä C¢üPÁgÀ
ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄAdÆgÁw
DzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÀÄ¥ÀðPÀªÁV ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄwÛ®èªÉA§
§UÉÎ Š ªÀÄgÀÄ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
181 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 18 ¸ÉÃE« ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸Á©ÃvÁzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ½UÉ
2001 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 14.9.2001 C£ÀÄUÀÄtªÁV «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÁzÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉUÀ¼À PÀÄjvÀÄ
182 Note No. DPAR 876 SRC 2002 Powers to impose penalties on the various
categories of posts in Karnataka
Government Secretariat
183 ¸À.C. ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 45 ¸ÉÃE« 2001 ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ
¢£ÁAPÀ: 4.3.2002 «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À°è «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÁV ºÁUÀÆ
ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃªÀÄPÀUÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ
£ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄUÀ½UÉ ¥ÀæAiÀiÁt ¨sÀvÉå (Conveyance
Allowance) ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
184 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 47 ¸ÉÃE« ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ
2001 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 23.3.2002 £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä GzÉÝÃ²¹zÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ
¸ÉÃªÁ «ªÀgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ºÁUÀÆ
zÉÆÃµÀgÀ»vÀ DzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
185 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 22 ¸ÉÃE« ¸ÀPÀæªÀÄ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è Qæ«Ä£À¯ï DgÉÆÃ¥À¢AzÀ
2001 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 5.7.2002 RÄ¯Á¸ÉUÉÆAqÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£ÀB ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è CªÀjUÉ ¤ÃqÀ¨ÉÃPÁzÀ
¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ¼À PÀÄjvÀÄ
186 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 25 ¸ÉÃE« £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ wÃ¥ÀÅð AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼À

2002 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 19.10.2002 ¥ÀæPÁgÀ E®èzÉÃ EzÀÝ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è CAvÀºÀ wÃ¦ð£À
«gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ°è ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
187 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 2 ¸ÉÃE« CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß

2003 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 6.2.2003 ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä gÀa¸À¯ÁVzÀÝ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
gÀzÀÄÝ¥Àr¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
188 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 7 ¸ÉÃE« E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É ¸À°è¸ÀÄªÀ°è

2003 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 12.5.2003 C¥ÀÇtð ªÀiÁ»w zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸À°è¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
189 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå ¹D¸ÀÄE 12 ¸ÉÃE« ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À°è EgÀÄªÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ
2003 ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆPÀ£É §UÉÎ.
190 C.eÁÕ. ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 12 ¸ÉÃE« 2003 ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß
¢£ÁAPÀ: 11.9.2003 DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è ºÁUÀÆ
CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä
¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVgÀÄªÀ PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ PÀÄjvÀÄ
2003 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 12.11.2003 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1957gÀ CrAiÀÄ°è
E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛzÁÝUÀ, ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ªÀÄøvÀ£ÁzÁUÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ
ªÀÄÄA¢£À PÀæªÀÄzÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ
192 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 17 ¸ÉÃE« ¢£ÀUÀÆ° DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ
2002 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.11.2003 ¹§âA¢AiÀÄ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
193 C.eÁÕ. ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 5 ¸ÉÃE« 2004 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt
¢£ÁAPÀ: 19.6.2004 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ
10PÉÌ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr
194 ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 1 ¸ÉÃE« E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É ¸À°è¸ÀÄªÀ°è

2005 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 9.2.2005 C¥ÀÇtð ªÀiÁ»w/ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸À°è¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
195 Circular No. DPAR 1 SDE 2005 Furnishing incomplete information/ records
date: 9.2.2005 while recommending for initiating
Departmental enquires - regarding
Circular
No.AD 19181-94 SE (Ac)1-56-1, dated: 5-12-1956
Sub:- Procedure in Anti-Corruption cases
In modification of the procedure indicated in the Official Memorandum No.m.580-
93/E.A.2-56-1, dated 13th April 1956, where Government propose to pass an original
order in disciplinary case files of the Efficiency Audit Department the following revised
procedure is brought into force forthwith.
1. The Special Officer, Efficiency Audit may after completion of
investigations in a case submit the records of enquiry with the findings and
recommendations to the Chief Secretary to Government in the General Administration
Department, (2) The General Administration Department will forward it to the
Administrative Department concerned for necessary action, except in those extraordinary
cases where the issues and the officials involved are such that it is not deemed fit to
consult the Administrative Department at all. In such latter cases, the Chief Secretary may
take the orders of the Minister in the Administrative Department and Chief Minister,
direct. (3) The Administrative Department will examine the report and take necessary
disciplinary action promptly as per procedure laid down if it agreed with the report. As
and when cases are so disposed of by the Administrative Departments, they should inform
the General Administrative Department about the manner of disposal. (4) Where the
Administrative Department is not in a position to agree with the report, its comments
should come to the General Administration Department, where further action would be
considered.
G.O.No.GAD 18 PHS 57 dated 20th March 1957

Sub:- Prompt transmission of appeals of Government Servants with relevant
documents.
A Case has recently come to notice where disciplinary action was taken by a
Government Officer against a Subordinate officer. The Subordinate officer appealed and
on that appeal the Head of the Department was asked by Government to send up all the
relevant papers. Inspite of a number of reminders, the papers did not reach Government
for a period of nearly two years. Government issued peremptory orders for the submission
of the papers.
2. This state of affairs is thoroughly unsatisfactory and showed that the Head of the
Department did not realise his responsibility in the matter.
3. Government rightly insist that appeals and representations from Government
Servants will reach Government through the proper channel. This, however casts an
equal responsibility on the superior officers to see that such appeal papers or
representations are transmitted to Government promptly and are not delayed unduly. Such
delay may cause irreparable damage to the Government servant concerned and in its turn,
may give rise to a crop of direct representations to higher authorities which is determental
to administrative discipline and efficiency.
4. It is accordingly impressed on all officers that appeals and representations
against orders addressed to higher authorities should be promptly forwarded with all the
relevant documents. Where any authority delays transmission of such papers, serious
notice of such delay may have to be taken.
O.M.No.GAD (S-1) 80 RSR 57, dated 9th May 1957

Notifying the dismissal of Government Servants
Under the instructions in force, it has been the practice to notify the dismissals of
Government Servants of erstwhile Mysore State in the Mysore Gazette in the following
cases, viz:-
(i) When it is necessary to notify to the public of the removal from service of an
officer, whether because his appointment was previously gazetted or from
any other cause; and
(ii) When it is specially desired to exclude from re-employment in the service of
Government, a public servant who has been dismissed for a heinous offence
such as fraud or falsification of accounts.
It is now considered that the above procedure should be made uniformly
applicable to the whole of the new Mysore State. Therefore, in supersession of all the
previous instructions in the matter, it is hereby directed that all cases of dismissals of
Government Servants should be referred to the Chief Secretary to the Government in the
General Administration Department (Services) every quarter for notifying the same in the
Mysore Gazette and for enabling the compilation and forwardal of such notifications to the
Heads of Departments, etc.
O.M.No: OSD 2 SMR 57, dated 29th June 1957.

Sub:- Procedure for consulting the Public Service Commission in Disciplinary and
other matters.
The following instructions are issued to regulate the procedure to be followed by the
Departments of the Secretariat in their dealings with the Mysore Public Service
Commission:
1. Whenever opinion of the Public Service Commission is required on a disciplinary
matter, the present practice of referring the file itself to the Public Service Commission for
opinion and the Commission recording its opinion on the Secretariat file itself is not
suitable.
2. In such disciplinary cases the Secretariat files should not be referred unofficially to
the Public Service Commission for their advice/opinion; instead of a self-contained letter
should be sent together with all papers relating to the Departmental Enquiry, viz., the
charge-sheet, the proceedings before the Enquiry Officer including the findings recorded,
the documents filed and the report of the Enquiry Officer. The Commission's reply will
then be sent to Government by a letter and, therefore, this practice will obviate any
difficulty which may otherwise arise in supplying copies of papers asked for by the
delinquent Government servant.
3. All references to the Commission in disciplinary cases should be made directly by
the Administrative Department concerned by an official letter addressed to the Secretary
of the Commission. Every such reference should be accompanied by all relevant papers or
copies of such papers. In such cases references to be Public Service Commission need be
routed through the General Administration (Services) Department only in cases where
general principles of methods of recruitment, promotion and transfer from one service to
another are involved. Under no circumstances should any Secretariat file containing
Departmental notes and minutes form part of the records sent to the Commission for
advice/opinion.
4. All cases of appointment by promotion to services and posts falling within the
purview of the Commission should be shown to the General Administration (Services)
Department before consulting the Commission under the relevant provisions of the
Mysore Public Service Commission Rules in this behalf.
5. When the Commission has come to conclusion in the matter it shall communicate its
recommendations/advice to the Department which makes the reference. When the
Department concerned has received the Commission's recommendations/advice and has
arrived at its own conclusion as to the orders which should be issued, it shall, before
issuing the orders, in cases where general principles arise, consult the General
Administration (Services) Departments. When the Department is not prepared to accept
the recommendations/advice of the Public Service Commission, the case should be put up
by the Secretary of the Administrative Department concerned to the Minister of the
portfolio Department concerned and the Chief Minister through the Chief Secretary. If it
is decided not to accept the advice of the Commission a second reference to the Public
Service Commission may be made.
6. If in any case it becomes necessary eventually not to accept the advice of the
Commission, a Council Note should then be prepared and submitted to the portfolio
Minister of the Administrative Department concerned and the Chief Minister through the
Chief Secretary.
7. If the Council decides to over-rule the advice/recommendation of the Public Service
Commission then the reasons for non-acceptance of the advice of the Commission should
be communicated to the Public Service Commission.
8. The Commission shall be informed of the action taken on its recommendations by
the Administrative Department concerned in all cases (including those relating to the
recruitment) which have been referred to the Commission for advice. Ordinarily an
endorsement forwarding copies of orders issued by Government in such cases will suffice.
9. As soon as a case is received back from the Commission with its advice, the
Secretariat Department concerned should without any delay dispose of the case in
conformity with the instructions contained in the Mysore Government Rules of Business
and Secretariat instructions.
10. These instructions should be followed strictly.
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
G.O.No.RD 185-RGP 57/2023-26A, dated 17th July 1957.
Departmental enquiries - Instructions for conducting of
According to orders issued by the Bombay Government, Departmental enquiries
against Government Servants should be completed within a period of three months, from
the date, a decision has been taken to hold such an enquiry, and that if the enquiry could
not be completed that time for any reason, orders of Government should be obtained for
the extension of the period. This subject was discussed at the Divisional Commissioner's
Conference held in January 1957. In the other integrated areas, there is no stipulation of
time. The Divisional Commissioners were of opinion that the proceedure in vogue in
Bombay may also be brought into force in the entire State.
Agreeing with the Divisional Commissioners, Government issue the following
instructions in the matter of Conducting departmental enquiries in the State.
1. An enquiry should be completed within a period of three months from the
date, a decision has been taken to hold such an enquiry.
2. In the case of enquiries held by an officer subordinate to the Deputy
Commissioner/ Collector, the Deputy Commissioner/Collector may extend
the period by two months.
3. In the case of enquiries conducted by the Deputy Commissioner/Collector,
the Divisional Commissioner may extend the period by two months.
4. If further extension of time is considered necessary sanction of Government
shall be obtained.
Government Circular No.GAD (S-1)25 SSR 57 dated 13th September 1957

Sub:- Anti-Corruption cases - Punishment.
In an anti-corruption case in which a Sub-Registrar, a Clerk, an Attender and a Peon
were involved and the evidence established that (a) the Sub-Registrar had taken a bribe
directly in one case and clouded in the taking of a bribe in the second case, (b) the clerk
had taken bribe directly in one case, (c) the peon had actively participated in the first case
of bribery, and (d) the attender had directly received the bribe in the second case, the
recommendation that the head of the office and clerk be reduced to a lower stage of the
time-scale that the attender be removed from service and the peon compulsorily retired
was accepted and orders issued accordingly.
2. The case came to notice recently on a review petition. The Chief Minister has
observed on this case as follows:-
"I very much wanted to revise the order, But in view of the orders, dated 12th
January 1956 and 14th September 1956, I do not want to disturb them. There
should be finality. Yet I would like to make an observation. While the more
educated and responsible officials like the Sub-Registrar and the clerk from
whom, in view of their superior status better moral conduct is expected are
punished by lowering their salaries, these two poor possibly illiterate officials,
the attender and the peon, are so heavily punished by being dismissed with
service. I feel it would have been more equitable and just if the two educated
officials the Sub-Registrar and the clerk, had been dismissed and the peon and
attender had their pay lowered. That I feel would be maintaining better
standards of meeting out justice. I wish this is accepted in future.
3. In bringing these observations to your notice it is requested that the authority
awarding punishment should see that the punishment is not only commensurate with the
offence but bears a relation also to the relative degrees of responsibility and sense of duty
which officials at various levels are expected to display.
O.M.NO.GAD (OM) 9 SMR 57, dated 12th December 1957

Sub:- Procedure for submission of Representations by Government Servant.
Government is pleased to issue the following instructions in regard to submission of
representations by Government Servants in respect of any matters pertaining to their
service and in respect of any disciplinary matters or orders affecting their conditions of
service. Provision is made for an appeal by the Government Servant under Rules 18 to 22
of the Mysore Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules 1957.
Representations should be addressed to the authority competent to entertain the appeal and
not to other authorities.
2. All representations should be concise, set out the grounds relied upon by the
Government servant and clearly specify the reliefs sought. As a second representation on
the same subject will not be entertained, it will be in the interest of the Government
servant to set out all relevant grounds and to mention all the reliefs which has seeks, in his
representations.
3. Any Government servant who has a grievance from which he seeks relief, must send
in his representation in his own name. Joint representations by more than one Government
servant will not be considered. This bar does not apply to representations made by
recognised Service Associations in accordance with their conditions of recognitions.
4. The representations should invariable be accompanied by a copy of the order
appealed against, if any.
5. The representation should be sent through the official superior of the Government
servant concerned, who should forward the representation with the relevant papers and his
comments, if any, without delay, to the higher authorities, except in the circumstances
mentioned in para 9 below.
6. An appeal or representation should be submitted within three months of the order
appealed against. An appeal or representation submitted beyond that period will only be
entertained at the discretion of the Government, on Government being satisfied that there
were adequate reasons for not submitting the representations within time.
7. Where Government has already passed on order on a representation, a fresh
representation on the same subject will not be entertained, unless the representation on the
face of it discloses new grounds not before Government when the previous order was
passed and adequate reasons for not placing those grounds before Government at that
time. Any such representations received will be merely recorded and no action will be
taken thereon.
8. An Officer who receives the representation from a subordinate office will transmit
the papers to proper authorities, with his comments and with the relevant records if any, in
his possession, with the least possible delay.
9. The representation should, however, be withheld in the following cases.
(i) It is time-barred and sufficient reasons are not assigned for the delay in
submitting the representation.
(ii) A copy of other order appealed against is not annexed to the representation.
(iii) A representation is debarred under paras 3 & 7.
The fact that a representation has been withheld and the reasons thereof shall be
communicated to the Government servant concerned except where the representations is
withheld under clause (iii) above.
10. The representation received from a Government servant should be forwarded by his
immediate superior officer through the official channel. The practice sometimes adopted
of handling back the representations to the aggrieved officer himself with the remarks of
the higher officer, for being taken personally to the higher authority, is not correct and
should cease. All noting on representations by officers at all levels and in the Secretariat
is confidential and should not be communicated to unauthorised persons.
11. The Government servant who after having made a representation does not receive an
order thereon within a period of two months, shall be entitled to send copies of his
representation directly with a copy of such communication to the authority through whom
the representation was originally addressed. Where the advance copy received does not
show that proper authorities at lower levels have been approached for securing necessary
relief, no action need be taken on the representation. Where, however, the advance copy
indicates that relief from the appropriate authorities at lower levels has been sought in
vain, the authority who receives the representations should take prompt action to get the
relevant records and pass suitable orders in the case.
12. The authority who withhold a representation shall, every three months, send a
statement of representations withheld by him, to the authority to whom the representations
withheld were addressed.
13. These instructions are issued in supersession of all previous rules, orders and
instructions on this subject. The procedure prescribed in these instructions shall, save as
otherwise provided in any rules made under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution
of India, be applicable to all representations pending on the date of issue of these
instructions.
Official Memorandum No.GAD(OM) 3 CAR 57 dated 14th December 1957

Sub:- Procedural instructions regarding the holding of Departmental Enquiries under
the Mysore Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules 1957.
The procedure to be follwed before an order of reduction to a lower post or time-
scale or to a lower stage in a time-scale, compulsory retirement before completion of the
prescribed number of years of qualifying service, removal or dismissal is passed against a
Government servant under rule 8 of the Mysore Civil Services (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules, 1957, subject of the exceptions mentioned in rule 14, is prescribed in rule
11 of those rules. Neglect in the due observance of the provisions of the rule is liable to
vitiate the whole proceedings and the ultimate order passed therein. It may often happen
that though on merits on order of punishment may be fully justified, it may have to be set
aside an account of some technical defect or irregularity committed in the conduct of the
inquiry. This may often enable a guilty party to escape punishment as also cause
considerable financial loss to Government. The following instructions are therefore issued
for the guidance of officers who may have occasion to hold an inquiry under the above
mentioned rule. Before holding an inquiry such officer is requested to go through these
instructions carefully and adhere to them:-
1. Preliminary enquiry:- (a) Before commencing and departmental enquiry against a
Government servant with regard to a disciplinary matter, it is necessary that thenar should
be sufficient evidence gathered by way of preliminary enquiry and the authority competent
to order the enquiry should be satisfied that there is sufficient prima-facie evidence to start
disciplinary proceedings against the Government servant concerned. This preliminary
enquiry may be made by any officer under whose administrative control the officer alleged
to be at fault is working (or was working at the time the acts complained of were
committed), but the decision to hold the enquiry can only be taken by the authority
competent to hold the enquiry under the rules.
(b) Any officer can ask for an explanation from a subordinate officer in respect of any
matter pertaining to his duties and it will often be advisable before initiating a
departmental enquiry to obtain the explanation as, after obtaining the explanation, the
reporting authority may feel that there is no case to initiate departmental proceedings at
all. The asking of such an explanation is, however, not compulsory and the authority
competent to order the investigation, will have to decide, according to the circumstances
of each case, whether such an explanation should be obtained before issue of a chargesheet
or not.
2. Issue of Charge-Sheet:- (a) Once the authority competent to appoint the enquiry
officer is satisfied that a departmental enquiry is necessary, or he is directed by higher
authority to hold a departmental enquiry the first higher authority to hold a departmental
enquiry the first step will be to appoint an Enquiry Officer (if a higher authority has
directed the officer to hold the enquiry himself, he himself will be the Enquiry Officer).
The Enquiry Officer should frame a charge-sheet containing:-
(i) definite charge or charges,
(ii) under each charge the grounds on which that charge is based, and
(iii) any other circumstances which it is proposed to take into consideration in
passing orders in the case.
Each charge should be drawn up clearly and precisely and care should be taken to
avoid vagueness.
(b) The charge-sheet should conclude with the following formula:-
"Please show cause why suitable disciplinary action should not be taken against you
on the charges mentioned above."
"You are required herewith to put in any written statement you may desire to submit
in your defence by ................. (the date to be specified). Please also state whether you
desire any oral enquiry and/or to be heard in person. In case you desire any oral enquiry to
be held please specify the witnesses you desire to cross-examine and the witnesses you
desire to examine in your defence. Your attention is invited in this connection to rule
11(6) of the Mysore Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules 1957. In
case you fail to put in your written statement by the above date, the undersigned may
proceed with the enquiry on the basis that you have no defence to offer".
3. Written statement in defence-The Enquiry Officer should fix a reasonable time
within which the written statement must be filed. In dealing with requests if any, for
further time, by the accused Government servant, the Enquiry Officer Will consider
whether the accused Government servant is sufficiently active in the preparation of his
defence and whether the time asked for is really necessary. An accused Government
servant must have reasonable facilities for the preparation of his defence, and subject to
this condition, it is the Enquiry Officer's responsibility to complete the Departmental
proceedings with the greatest despatch and submit his report to the appropriate authority.
Normally, the maximum period for which an officer can be kept under suspension is six
months and, as within this period, final orders have to be passed, it would be reasonable to
except the Government servant concerned to put in his defence within three to five weeks
according to the nature of the case. These limits are only ment for general guidance and
are not to be taken as absolute limits. In simple and straight forward cases, even three
weeks may not be necessary, while a case which involves study of columinous record, not
in the Government servant's own office, a longer period than five weeks may be necessary.
4. Request for an oral inquiry and/or to be heard in person:- (a) If within the
prescribed time, or such further time as the Enquiry Officer may give, no written statement
in defence is filed and no request in writing is made for oral enquiry or for being heard in
person, the Enquiry Officer may either record his findings forthwith without holding any
further enquiry, or, at his discretion, enquire into the matter further to satisfy himself about
the truth of the charges. An enquiry must be held where the Government servant asks for
it, or has expressed a desire to be heard in person, or having regard to the written statement
in defence or the statement made by the Government servant himself when he is heard in
person, a further enquiry is necessary to decide the truth of the charges.
(b) Except in respect of very straight forward cases, the Enquiry Officer will always
find it useful to examine the Government servant concerned orally, irrespective of whether
the Government servant desires to be heard in person or not.
5. Record of evidence:- (a) At the oral enquiry evidence should be heard on charges
which are not admitted or which, though admitted, the Enquiry Officers desires to
investigate. The enquiry, however, should not extend to matters not mentioned in the
charge-sheet.
(b) The evidence in support of the charges should be recorded first and the accused
Government Servant given an opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses.
(c) The evidence of each witness should be recorded in the form of a narrative and when
the evidence is completed it should be read over to the witness, and, if necessary explained
to him in the language in which it was given. If the witness denied the correctness of any
part of the evidence when it is read over to him, the Enquiry Officer may either carry out
the correction or, instead of correcting the evidence, make memorandum of the objection
and add such remarks as he thinks necessary. Then, the statement shall be signed by the
Enquiry Officer. Copies of such evidence as are required by the accused Government
servant may be permitted to be taken by him or at the discretion of the Enquiry Officer
supplied to him.
6. Enforcing the attendance of witnesses:- (a) The Officer holding the enquiry has no
power to enforce the attendance of any non-official witnesses. As regards official
witnesses he should be able to procure their presence either by writing to them direct or to
their superior officers at appropriate levels. Normally, the request to call an official
witness, when his evidence is relevant, should not be rejected. When, however, it appears
that the request is frivolous or vexatious or it is made with a view to prolong unnecessarily
the enquiry, the request should be refused and the reasons there of recorded in writing.
(b) The above instructions for recording the evidences of witnesses apply equally to the
record of the examination of the accused Government servant himself.
7. Expenses of witnesses:- Except where they are official witnesses whose evidence is,
in the opinion of the Enquiry Officer, relevant the expenses of witnesses called by the
Enquiry Officer at the instance of the person charged should be borne by the latter. Before
asking such a person to appear before him as a witness, the Enquiry Officer may require
the person charged to deposit the necessary expenses with him. The expenses of other
witnesses called to give evidence should be borne by Government. As far as official
witnesses are concerned, their appearance at the enquiry will form part of their duty.
8. Inspection of documents by the Government servant concerned:- The Enquiry
Officer should give every reasonable facility to the accused Government servant to inspect
any documents or records necessary for the purpose of preparing his defence. Such
inspection shold be arranged in the presence of a responsible Government servant to
ensure that the records are not tampered with in any manner. The documentary evidence
in the custody of the accused should be produced by him along with his written statement.
If it is produced later, the Enquiry Officer may admit or reject it in his discretion.
Normally such evidence should not be rejected unless it has the effect of unnecessarily
prolonging the enquiry and the accused Government servant has not offered a reasonable
excuse for not having produced the evidence earlier.
9. Enquiry Officer's responsibility:- It is the Enquiry Officer's responsibility to arrive
at the truth of falsity of the charges against the Government servant. For this purpose, it is
his responsibility to put whatever questions as may be necessary both to the witnesses
examined in support of the charge and to the withnesses produced by the accused
Government servant.
10. Prohibition against appearance by Lawyers:- Lawyer should not be allowed to
appear in departmental enquiries, whether for the accused Government servant or against
the accused Government servant. Rule 28 of the Classification Control and Appeal Rule
refers.
11. Submission by the accused of another written statement:-After all the evidence
has been heard, the person charged shall, if he so desires, put in a further written statement
in his defence and also explain his defence orally to the Enquiry Officer.
12. Drawing up of the findings by the Enquiry Officer:- (a) On completion of the
enquiry, including the personal examination of the accused Government servant, if any, as
the case may be, the enquiry officer shall record his findings in respect of each charge,
with reasons thereof, and forward the proceedings to the authority appointing him.
(b) The proceedings, forwarded shall contain,-
(i) the charges framed against the Government servant alongwith the grounds
of charge;
(ii) written statement filed in defence, if any;
(iii) a sufficient record of the evidence, given during the oral enquiry as also the
documentary evidence;
(iv) a memorandum of the points urged by the Government servant concerned
during the personal hearing, if any;
(v) a statement of the finding of the Enquiry Officer on the different charges and
the grounds therefor; and
(vi) the penalty recommended.
13. Provisional conclusion:- The authority competent to impose punishment, on perusal
of the proceedings, shall come to a provisional conclusion in regard to the penalty to be
imposed.
14. Giving of a second or further opportunity to the person charged:- If this penalty
is any one of the penalties mentioned in clauses (v), (vi), (vii) and (viii) of rule 8 of the
Rules, the person charged should be supplied with a copy of the report of the enquiring
authority and be called upon by t he competent authority or such other officer authorised
by it in this behalf to show cause within a reasonable time, not ordinarily less than one
week, or exceeding one month, against the particular penalty proposed to be inflicted.
Any representation in this behalf submitted by the person charged shall be duly taken into
consideration before final orders are passed.
15. Consultation with the Public Service Commission:- (a) Where the authority to
impose punishment is Government it is, save in exceptional cases, necessary, before
passing an order, to consult the Public Service Commission. In asking for the advice of
the Commission, the complete records of the case, namely, the records mentioned in para
12(b), the show cause notice issued under para 14 and the Government servant's reply, if
any, should be forwarded to the Commission. It would not be necessary to examine the
case in great detail at this stage, as Government would take a final decision only after
receiving the advice of the Public service Commission. For the same reason, unless the
Minister concerned has specifically so directed, it is ordinarily undesirable and
unnecessary to obtain the orders of the Minister concerned at this stage.
(b) On receipt of the advice of the Commission, the papers should be submitted to the
Minister concerned for orders.
(c) Where, for any reason, it is felt that the Commission's advice cannot be accepted, the
papers should be referred to the General Administration Department. The General
Administration Department will either take up the case again with the Commission or, in
case it is felt necessary to deviate from the advice of the Commission, submit the case to
the Council of Ministers for final orders.
16. Drawing up of the final order:- (a) The final order containing the decision of the
authority competent to impose the penalty should be a self-contained order. The order
should set out briefly the relevant facts, findings of the Enquiry Officer, the advice of the
Commission and Government's decision thereon with reasons in brief for any departure
from the findings of the Enquiry Officer or advice of the Commission, and it should be
signed by an officer authorised to sign orders on behalf of Government under the Rules of
Business, if Government issues the order or in other cases by the authority competent to
impose the particular punishment. A copy of this order should be supplied to the accused
Government servant.
(b) A copy of the letter of the Public Services Commission containing its advice may, if
applied for, be supplied to the accused Government servant.
17. Cases in which procedure detailed above need not be follwed:- The procedure
laid down in rules 11, 12 and 13 of the Rules may not be followed and all or any of the
above instructions may be waived in the following cases:-
(i) when the order of punishment, i.e., reduction, compulsory retirement,
removal or dismissal, is based on facts which have led to the conviction of
the person charged in a criminal court. In such cases the order of
punishment may be passed on the strength of the facts as disclosed in the
criminal case;
(ii) where the Disciplinary Authority is satisfied for reasons to be recorded in
writing that it is not reasonably practicable to follow the procedure
prescribed in the said rule, e.g., where the Government servant has absented
himslef from duty and the address of the Government servant is not known;
or
(iii) where the Governor is satisfied that in the interest of the security of the State,
it is not expedient to follow such procedure, the Disciplinary Authority may
consider the circumstances of the case and pass such orders thereon as it
deems fit:
Provided that the Commission shall be consulted before passing such orders in any
case in which such consultation is necessary.
18. Procedure to be followed in cases of minor punishments:- It is not necessary, to
follow the elaborate procedure detailed in the preceding paragraphs in respect of penalties
mentioned in clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) of rule 8 of the Rules. But before imposing any
such punishment, the Government servant should be given a reasonable opportunity to
make a representation against the action proposed to be taken. In particular, it is not
necessary to give the Government servant, in such cases a notice to show cause against the
proposed punishment after he had an opportunity to answer the allegations aganist him.
19. Suspension:- (a) Placing of a Government servant under suspension under rule 10 of
the Rules where an enquiry into his conduct is contemplated, or is pending, would imply
the commencement of a departmental inquiry in a disciplinary action. This Action shall
not require the giving of a prior notice and obtaining the explanation of the Government
servant concerned.
(b) The purpose in placing an officer under suspension is to keep him away from a
position where he can interfere with conduct of the enquiry or temper with the
documentary or oral evidence in any manner, or, where, having regard to the nature of the
charges against him, it is felt that it would be unsafe to continue to vest in him the powers
of his post.
(c) Where an officer is placed under suspension, it is particularly necessary to expedite
the enquiry proceedings and to complete the departmental enquiry as early as possible.
(d) The authority competent to suspend a Government servant, while issuing the orders
of suspension should invariably mention in the said order the subsistence allowance which
shold be paid to the Government servant concerned under the rules.
(e) A Government servant should not be suspended pending enquiry as a measure of
punishment. Where, however an officer has been suspended pending enquiry into his
conduct, the following courses would be open at the conclusion of the inquiry:-
Where the authority competent to impose any punishment-
(i) makes an order fully exonerating or acquitting him, the period during which
he was under suspension pending the inquiry shall be deemed to be period of
duty and the Government servant shall be entitled to full pay and allowances
as if he had not been placed under suspension:
(ii) makes an order imposing any penalty, other than a penalty of compulsory
retirement, removal from service or dismissal from service, the Government
servant shall be paid for the period of suspension such proportion of his pay
and allowances not less than subsistences allowance payable under the rules
as the said authority may in its discretion specify; and where no such
proportion is specified, the Government servant shall be paid the maximum
subsistence allowance admissible under the rules relating to grant of
subsistence allowance and the period of suspension shall count as duty
unless the said authority has otherwise directed:
(iii) makes an order imposing the penalty of compulsory retirement, removal
from service or dismissal, shall be paid for the period of suspension such
proportion of his pay and allowances as the said authority may, in its
discretion specify and where no such proportion is specified the maximum
subsistence allowance admissible under the rules relating to grant of
subsistence allowance and the period of suspension shall not count as duty
for any purpose unless the said authority has otherwise directed.
20. Cases of alleged criminal misconduct of Government Servants:- The following
procedure should normally be adopted in cases of alleged criminal misconduct of
Government Servants:-
(a) As soon as sufficient evidence is available for the purpose in the course of
investigation in case of misconduct, whether such investigation is conducted
departmentally, through the Anti-Corruption Department or through the Police, action
should be taken under the Mysore Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal)
Rules, 1957 or other appropriate disciplinary rules, and disciplinary proceedings should be
initiated forthwith. Such departmental proceedings need not interfere with the Police
investigation, which may be continued, where necessary. After the departmental
proceedings are concluded, the penalty, if any, imposed as a result thereof, the question of
prosecution should be considered in the light of such material as may have become
available as a result of the investigation.
(b) In suitable cases, criminal proceedings should thereafter be initiated. Before
initiating such proceedings advice on the evidence should be obtained from Government's
legal advisers, including in sufficiently important cases from the Advocate-General.
Where the conduct of a Government servant discloses a grave offence of a criminal nature,
criminal prosecution should be the rule and not the exception. Where the competent
authority is satisfied that there is no criminal prosecution, which can be reasonably
sustained against such an officer prosecution should not, of course, be resorted to, but
prosecution should not be avoided merely on the ground that the case might lead to an
acquittal.
(c) Should the decision of the trial court or the appellate court, as the case may be, lead
to the acquittal of the accused, it maybe necessary to review the decision taken earlier as a
result of the departmental proceedings a point to be taken into account in such review
would be whether the legal proceedings and the departmental proceedings covered
precisely the same grounds.
If they did not, and the legal proceedings related only to one or two charges, i.e., not
the entire field of departmental proceedings, it may not be found necessary to alter the
decision already taken. Moreover, it should be remembered that while the court may have
held that the facts of the case did not amount to an offence under the law, it may well be
that the competent authority in the departmental proceedings might hold that the
Government servant was guilty of a departmental misdemeanor and he had not behaved in
the manner in which a person of his position was expected to behave.
O.M.No.GAD(S-1) 80 RSR 57, dated 4th January 1958.

Sub: Preparation and submission of quarterly returns of dismissed Government
Servants.
In continuation of the instructions issued in Official Memorandum No.GAD (S-1)
80-RSR-57, dated the 9th May 1957, it is directed that particulars as noted below be
furnished in the prescribed quarterly return in respect of dismissed persons should be-
included in the prescribed return only after the statutory appeal, if any, preferred by him is
disposed of; or after the time prescribed in the rules for preferring the appeal has elapsed
and no appeal has been preferred by him.
1. Name, Father's Name and Educational Qualification.
2. Date and Place of Birth
3. Place of Residence
4. Marks of identification
5. Post held
6. Reasons for dismissal.
2. Nil returns should also be sent
O.M.No.GAD(S-1) 80, RSR 57, dated: 4th February 1958

Sub:- Quarterly statements of dismissals of Government Servants-forwardal of for
notification.
Instructions regarding preparation and submission of quarterly returns of dismissed
Government Servants have been issued in Official Memorandum No.GAD (S-1) 80, RSR
57, dated 9th May 1957 and 4th January 1958. It is noticed that statements of dismissals
of Government Servants are not being submitted to Government punctually. As even 'nil'
returns have to be sent it is directed that the returns should be submitted to Chief Secretary
to Government so as to reach on the 5th of the following quarter punctually.
Circular No. GAD 11 GEI 58, dated 30th May 1958.

Confidential Records - entries.
Attention is invited to the Chief Secretary's circular No.GAD 11-GEI-58, dated
15th May 1958, wherein it has been impressed that copies of orders regarding action taken
against Government Servants in disciplinary proceedings should be placed in their
confidential records. Apart from penalties actually imposed, there are case in which
orders are passed or directions are given, which have a bearing on the transfers or
promotion of the Government servant concerned or on the capacity of the Government
servant. It is essential that even though such directions or orders may not amount to a
punishment, copies thereof should be kept in the respective confidential records and while
considering proposals for transfer or promotion; the confidential record of the particular
Government servant should be invariably referred to.
O.M.No: GAD 27 SSR 58, dated 18th October 1958

Sub:- Procedure in Disciplinary cases - avoidance of delay.
It has been brought to the notice of Government that on may occasions the
Departments do not send at once all the relevant records pertaining to disciplinary cases
referred to the Public Service Commission with the result that it becomes impossible for
the Commission to communicate their recommendations without delay. The urgency in
the disposal of disciplinary cases need hardly be emphasised. Attention of the Secretariat
Department is invited to para 13 of O.M.No:GAD (OM) 3 CAR 57, dated the 14th
December 1957, and it is requested that as laid down in that para, the following documents
are invariably sent to the Commission, when it is consulted in disciplinary cases:-
(i) the charges framed against the Government servant along with the grounds
of charge;
(ii) written statement filled in defence, if any;
(iii) a sufficient record of the evidence given during the oral enquiry as also the
documentary evidence;
(iv) a memo of the points urged by the Government servant concerned during the
personal hearing, if any;
(v) statement of the findings of the Enquiry Officer on the different charges and
the grounds therefor;
(vi) the penalty recommended;
(vii) the show cause notice issued to the Government servant and his reply
thereto;
provided that in cases of minor penalties where as per rule 12 of the M.C.S.
(Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957, no departmental enquiry is held, the
question of sending the records mentioned at (iii), (iv) and (v) above would not arise.
The service book (or history of services in the case of a Gazetted Officer) and the
confidential record of the Government servant should also be sent to the Commission in
all cases since they are necessary in determining the quantum of penalty.
The Departments are also requested to see that in cases where a Departmental
Enquiry is held and the Government servant in reply to the show cause notice states that
he has not been provided with adequate opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses or that
there has been some flaw in the conduct of the enquiry, etc., the points raised are
examined and their remarks on them made available to the commission whenever it is
consulted. Some of these points may raise vital issues visa is the validity of the enquiry
itself and it is necessary that the Commission is posted with full information with regard to
them before it can give its opinion.
The Departments are requested to follow these instructions scrupulously.
Circular. No: GAD (S.1) 38 SSR 58, dated: 30th October 1958.
Sub:- Misappropriation of Government Money - Enquiry - procedure for.
In a case of misappropriation of government dues, a clarification has been sought,
whether immediate steps are to be taken for recovery of the amount and a departmental
enquiry started against the delinquent, simultaneously with the launching of a criminal
prosecution.
2. Attention is invited, in this connection to the procedure laid down in para 20 of
Official Memorandum No. GAD 3 CAR 57, dated 14th December 1957, wherein it has
been prescribed the departmental enquiry should first be completed with the greatest
despatch before initiating criminal proceedings. Therefore, in misappropriation cases, the
proper procedure is first to start a departmental enquiry and to take steps for recovery of
the amount from the delinquent, if he is found to have misappropriated the amount.
3. If, after completing Departmental proceedings, it is considered that the case is
suitable for proceedings against the delinquent in a Criminal Court, such action should be
taken. Once the criminal proceedings have been initiated no steps for recovery of the
amount should be taken, until the criminal case is decided. Though there is no legal bar
for recovery of the amount pending a criminal trial, it has been recognised as a rule of
equity that nothing should be done during the pendency of a criminal trial that would
prejudice the defence of the accused.
4. Further, in any case where criminal proceedings have already been initiated before
the departmental enquiry has been completed, the departmental proceedings should also be
stayed until the disposal of the criminal case, if the subject matter of such proceedings is
also the subject matter of a charge against the delinquent in a criminal Court. Such cases
should not normally occur hereafter.
ADDENDUM
Sub:- Criminal misconduct - Government Servants - Procedure to be followed.
Several doubts have been expressed regarding the exact procedure to be followed in
cases of criminal misconduct committed by Government Servants. The following
clarifications are issued in partial modification of Instruction 20 of Procedural Instructions
issued in O.M.No.GAD (OM) 3 CAR 57, dated 14-12-57 and Circular No.GAD (S.1) 38
SSR 58, dated 30th October 1958, namely:-
1. Where officers are trapped or caught red handed while accepting illegal gratification,
the investigation should be continued and completed and regular charge-sheet in the Court
of the concerned Special Judge should be filed.
2. Where cases are initiated by the police either SUO MOTU or at the instance of the
Head of a Department, if on completion of the investigation, it is found that the evidence
collected is not sufficient so as to warrant a conviction in a Court of Law, the Anti-
Corruption Department or the Police Department, as the case may be, should consider and
move the concerned Court for obtaining the relevant summary for dropping the
proceedings. After obtaining such a summary, the records of investigation should be
forwarded to the Head of the Department who should decide about the sufficiency of the
material for initiating a departmental enquiry under the M.C.S.(CCA) Rules, 1957 and
take action accordingly.
3. Where departmental enquiries have been started without reference to the police, such
enquiries should be continued and completed according to the rules. If at any stage of the
enquiry, the Disciplinary Authority considers that the Offences disclosed are so grave that
a prosecution in a Court of Law is essential in the interest of administration, then steps
should be taken to launch regular prosecution and the Departmental enquiry should be
kept in abeyance.
4. It is impressed on all concerned that delay in the institution of criminal prosecution
not only frustrates the object of the prosecution but may possibly affect the credit to be
attached to the evidence that will be adduced in support of the prosecution. Delayed
prosecutions are looked upon with suspicion by Courts. It is essential therefore that
prosecution should normally be conceived at the earliest stage as soon as the offence is
committed and detected. If in any case there is delay in launching a prosecution, then such
cases should be continued only departmentally.
5. Where a prosecution ends in an order of acquittal, then the question of Departmental
enquiry does not arise if the accused has been acquitted on merits. If the order of acquittal
is on some technical ground, then the propriety of starting a Departmental enquiry should
be considered on the merits of each case after a careful scrutiny of the judgement.
Circular No.GAD 36 DIF(Int) 58, dated: 15th November 1958

Sub:- States Reorganisation-Provisions as to Services-Procedure in respect of
disciplinary matters.
I am directed to forward herewith for information a copy of letter number 21/3/58
SR (S) dated 30th October 1958, received from the Secretary to Government of India
Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi, on the subject mentioned above. These instructions
may be followed in dealing with cases of disciplinary proceedings initiated prior to 1st
November 1956.
Copy of the letter No.21/3/58 SR(S) dated 30th October 1958 from Shri D.D.Gothi,
Under Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, to the Additional
Secreatry to the Government of Mysore, General Administration Department,
(Integration), Bangalore.
I am directed to refer to the State Government's letter No.GAD (INT) 36/DIF/58,
dated the 17th May 1958 in which they asked for the views of the Government of India
regarding the procedure to be adopted in dealing with:-
(i) appeals or petitions for reinstatement preferred after 1st November 1956 by
officials who were dismissed removed or compulsorily retired before 1st
November 1956 while serving in areas which now form part of the State of
Mysore.
(ii) pending departmental proceedings in which final orders have not been
passed;
(iii) the appeals or petitions preferred prior to 1st November 1956 by persons
compulsorily retired, removed or dismissed;
(iv) the cases, in which departmental enquiris are to be held against the officials
in respect of acts of misconduct while serving in areas forming part of States
of Bombay, Andhra Pradesh and Madras.
2. The Government of India have considered the matter and they are of the view that a
person who was dismissed, removed or compulsorily retired by a competent authority
before 1st November 1956 was not one who held a post within the meaning of section 116
of the S.R.Act 1956, and as such cannot be alloted to any State under section 115 of the
said Act. In the circumstances, the Government of India consider that appeals or petitions
from such persons preferred before or after 1st November 1956 should be disposed of by
the principal successor State. In case it is ultimately decided to reinstate the Government
servant the question of his allocation will be decided in consultation with the State
Governments concerned.
3. The procedure followed by the State Government in the case of appeals or petitions
of officers of the former States of Mysore and Coorg is correct.
4. As regards pending departmental proceedings and appeals and petitions, a distinction
may be drawn between:-
(a) cases where an officer held a post or would be deemed to have held a post
under any State immediately before 1st November 1956 and
(b) cases where the officer did not hold any post and is also not deemed to have
held any post immediately before 1st November 1956.
In the case of (a) above, the proceedings may be continued by the appropriate
authority of the State to which such officer has been allotted or is deemed to have been
allotted by general or special orders of the Central Government, whereas in the case of (b)
the enquiry will have to be continued by the authority in the principal successor state.
Pending appeals and petitions may also be disposed of accordingly.
5. As regards cases in which departmental enquiries have to be held against officials in
respect of acts of mis-conduct while serving in areas which form part of States of Bombay,
Madhya Pradesh and Madras, I am to invite your attention to this Ministry's letter
No.F6/12/58-SR(S), dated 22nd August 1958 (copy enclosed)
Copy of the letter No.F.6/12/58SR(S), dated the 22nd August 1958 from Shri
D.D.Gothi, Under Secretary to the Govt. of India to the Secretary to the Government of
Mysore Education Department, Bangalore.
Sub:- Departmental enquiry against Shri M.S.Mahamood III Grade Clerk (under
suspension) of the Office of the Director of Public Instruction, Hyderabad now
transferred to the office of the Deputy Director of Public Instruction, Raichur.
Circular No.21/3/58-SR(S), dated New Delhi-1, 30th October 1958
Copy with a copy of letter replied to is forwarded to the Governments of Andhra
Pradesh, Bombay, Bihar, Kerala, Madras, Madya Pradesh, Rajasthan and West Bengal.
I am directed to refer to your letter No.ED 29 SES 57 dated the 1st May 1958 on
the above subject, and to say that the question raised therein has been examined in
consultation with the Law Ministry here. The Government of India consider that the best
course will be for the Government of Mysore to appoint one of their own officers to do the
enquiry, who may, if found necessary to go to Andhra Pradesh for the purpose of
conducting the enquiry. I am to add that an alternative method would be to cancel the
provisional allocation of Shri Mahmood to Mysore so that he may be brought over to
Andhra Pradesh for completion of the enquiry by the Government of that State. This
course is however, of doubtful legal validity, and would also not be consistent with the
general position indicated in para 4 of this Ministry's Circular letter No.6/3/58-SR(S)
dated 8th March 1958.
In the opinion of the Government of India, there should be no difficulty in
following the first alternative, namely, that the Government of Mysore should appoint one
of their own officer who should, if necessary visit Hyderabad to complete the enquiry. I
am accordingly to suggest this procedure.
O.M.No.GAD(S-1) 86 RSR 58, dated 21st November 1958

Sub:- Disciplinary action against Government Servants.
Sub-rule (9) of Rule 11 of the Mysore Civil Services (C.C&A) Rules 1957, provides
that the disciplinary authority shall, if it is not Inquiring authority, consider the record of
the inquiry and record its findings on each charge. Further sub-rule 10(1) requires that if
the disciplinary authority, having regard to its findings on the charges, is of the opinion
that any of the penalties specified in clauses (v) to (viii) of Rule 8 should be imposed, it
shall give to the accused Government servant a notice stating the action proposed to be
taken in regard to him and asking him to show cause, within a specified time, why the
action proposed to be taken against him should not be taken. The disciplinary authority is
required, at the same time, to furnish to the Government servant a copy of the Inquiring
authority's report and, where the disciplinary authority is not the Inquiring authority, a
statement of its findings together with brief reasons for disagreement, if any with the
findings of the Inquiring authority. Regulation 5 of the Mysore Public Service
Commission (Consultation) Regulations, 1958, classifies the cases in which the
disciplinary authority should consult the Commission before passing final orders. The
question has been raised whether it is necessary under the provisions of the Constitution
that at the conclusion of the enquiry, the disciplinary authority should record its findings
on each charge before issuing a show cause notice on the delinquent Government servant
and whether the Public Service Commission should be consulted only once before passing
the final orders after receipt of reply to the show cause notice or twice. Once before
issuing the show cause notice to the accused Government servant and again before passing
final orders in the matter. It is hereby clarified that the disciplinary authority should
record its provisional findings on each charge before calling on the Government servant to
show cause why any of the penalties specified in clauses (v) to (viii) of Rule 8 of the
Mysore Civil Services (C.C.& A) Rules should not be imposed on him and that a reference
to the Public Service Commission where necessary, should be made only after service of
show cause notice on the accused Government servant and receipt of his reply, if any,
thereto. The disciplinary authorities are requested to bear this requirement under the
provisions of the Constitution as any lapse on their part is likely to vitiate the proceedings
in the cases of disciplinary matters.
CIRCULAR No.GAD(S-1) 35 SSR 58, Bangalore, dated 8th January 1959

Issue instructions regarding the Departmental Proceedings against Government
Servants for misconduct.
A number of instances have come to the notice Government in which the
Departmental proceedings taken against Government Servants have been quashed by the
High Court on the Ground that the proceedings were procedurally defective. While this is
especially true of departmental enquiries held before the issue of the Mysore Civil
Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957, it is observed that even in some
of the enquiries held after the issue of these Rules, the enquiries have not been held in
conformity with the procedure laid down therein. The common defects noticed in the
large majority of cases are as under:-
1) failure to frame specific charges,
2) recording of evidence of witnesses in support of the charges, in the absence
of the delinquent Government servant, of merely giving him an opportunity
to cross-examine the witnesses without first recording his evidence as
against the delinquently,
3) failure to comply with reasonable requests for inspecting the relevant
records.
4) failure to furnish the reasons for the findings on the charges.
5) the imposition of a major penalty without giving a show cause notice to the
official concerned, as required under Article 311 (2) of the Constitution, and
6) failure to furnish a copy of the report of the enquiry to the delinquent
alongwith the show cause notice.
2. It would appear from these defects that Enquiry Officers do not study the
instructions on the subject. This is inexcusable. The attention of all officers is invited to
Official Memorandum No.GAD 3 CAR 57 dated 14th December 1957, which contains
detailed instructions regarding the manner of holding Departmental enquires. In
particular, the disciplinary authorities should bear in mind that failure to comply with the
provisions of Article 311(2) of the Constitution, which requires that a reasonable
opportunity to show cause against the action proposed to be taken in regard to him, should
be given in any case in which a Government servant is proposed to be dismissed or
removed or reduced in rank, will vitiate the entire proceedings. As provided in Rule 11(8)
to (12) of the Mysore Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, it is
mandatory that whenever any major penalty such as is mentioned in Rule imposed on a
Government servant, a show cause notice must be issued to the accused Government
servant, stating the action proposed to be taken against him, and asking him to show cause,
within a specified time, why such action should not be taken. The official is also entitled
to know the reasons of the disciplinary authority in coming to the conclusion that the
charges against him have been proved. Therefore, while issuing a hx show cause notice, it
is essential that a copy of the enquiry officer's report is also furnished. Where the
disciplinary authority is not the inquiring authority, a statement of its findings to-gether
with the reasons for disagreement, if any with the findings of the inquiring authority,
should also be made available to the accused Government servant.
3. In this connection, It may be noted that reduction in pay or postponement of
increment with retrospective effect except where the pay is held up at an efficiency bar is a
major penalty which attracts the provisions of Article 311 (2) of the Constitution requiring
the disciplinary authority to serve a show cause notice on the delinquent Government
servant before imposing such a penalty.
4. It is impressed upon all officers that neglect in the due observance of the procedure
prescribed in the Rules, is liable to vitiate the whole proceedings and the ultimate order
passed therein. It may happen that though on merits the order of punishment may be fully
justified, it may have to be set aside on account of some technical defect or irregularity
committed in the conduct of the enquiry. This may often enable a guilty party to escape
punishment, as also cause considerable financial loss to Government. It should be noted
that glaring faults in procedure by officers conducting enquiries will be deemed a failure
of duty and Government will be constrained to take suitable action against the defaulting
officers.
O.M.No.GAD 6 OSR 59, Bangalore, dated the 25th April 1959

Procedural instructions regarding Departmental Enquiries under the C.C.A. Rules.
In para 4 of the Offical Memorandum issued with No.GAD 3 CAR 57, dated 14th
December 1957, laying down the procedure for dealing with the request by a Government
servant for an oral enquiry and/or to be heard in person it is stated that "an enquiry must be
held where the Government servant asks for it" etc., The intention of the said rule is that
an enquiry should be held only if the Government servant desires such enquiry and not
otherwise. The word "WHERE" is used only in the above sense, and is not intended to
confer the right to choose venue of the enquiry on the Government servant. To place the
matter beyond doubt, it is directed that the word "if" be substituted for the word "where"
occurring in para 4 of the Official Memorandum referred to above line 10 of the printed
copy.
O.M.No.GAD 8 OSR, 59 dated 18th May1959

Sub:- Supply of copies of Evidence, etc. to delinquent officers.
In para 5 of the procedural instruction in regard to holding departmental enquires
under the Mysore Civil Services (C.C.A) Rules, 1957, issued with O.M.No.GAD (OM) 3
CAR 57, dated the 14th December 1957, it has been stated that copies of such evidence as
are required by the accused Government servant may be permitted to taken by him or at
the discretion of the enquiry officer supplied to him. The question has been arised
whether the supply of copies is to be free or charged for. It is hereby directed that
normally the procedure should be that the Government servant himself should be
permitted to take copies if he so desires and in this case there can be no charges. If in any
particular case for special reasons, the enquiry officer feels that he should arrange to
supply copies himself he may furnish uncertified copies and, consiering the labour
involved a charge of 14 N.P. per 100 words may be levied. The enquiry officer should as
far as possible should avoid the regular system of supplying copies and arrange that the
delinquent official himself takes copies, as otherwise it will mean the setting up of a
copying organisation in offices which have to deal with a large number of enquiries.
GOVERNMENT OF MYSORE
No.GAD (S1) 23 SSR 59. Mysore Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated: 2nd July, 1959.
Ashada 11 S.E. 1881.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- "Warning" and "Censure" - Distinction between.
Enquiries are being received by Government as to the distinction between "Warning"
and "Censure". The main distinction is that an order of "Censure" is a formal and public
act intended to convey that the person concerned has been held guilty of some blame-
worthy act or omission for which it has been found necessary to award him a formal
punishment. And nothing can amount to a 'Censure' unless it is intended to be such a
formal punishment and imposed for 'good and sufficient reasons' after following the
procedure prescribed in the Mysore Civil Services (C.C.A) Rules 1957. A record of the
punishment so imposedis kept on the Officer's confidential roll and the fact that he has
been 'Censured' will have its bearing on the assessment of his merit or suitability for
promotion to higher posts.
2. It is the duty of superior officer to see that he gives to his subordinates at all time
advice, guidance and assistance to correct their faults and dificiencies. There may be
occasions when a superior officer may find it necessary to criticise adversly the work of
his subordinates (e.g. point out negligence, carelessness, lack of thoroughness, delays, etc)
or he may call for an explanation for some act or omission and taking all circumstances
into consideration, it may be felt that, while the matter is not serious enough to justify the
imposition of the formal punishment of 'Censure', it calls for some informal action, such as
the communication of written warning, admonition or reprmand.
3. It is a matter of simple nature justice that written warnings, repremands etc., should
not be administered or placed on a Government servant's confidential record unless the
authority doing so is satisfied that there is good and sufficient reason to do so. Thus, if the
circumstances, justify it, a mention may also be made of such a warning etc., in the
officer's confidential roll; however, the mere fact that it is so mentioned in the character
roll does not convert the warning etc., into a 'Censure', because it has not intended that a
"Formal punishment" should be inflicted nor were any formal proceedings as required
under the C.C.A. Rules held.
The Heads of Departments are required to bear in mind this distinction between
'Warning' and 'Censure'.
Sd/-
Under Secretary to Government,
G.A.D. (Services-I).
O.M.No.GAD (S-1) 44 SSR 59, Bangalore, dated 20th July 1959.

Imposition of Penalty of reduction-specifying the period
One of the penalties specified in Rule 8 of the Mysore Civil Services
(Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1957 is reduction to a lower service, grade or
post. According to Rule 7 of Mysore Govt. Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 when a
Government servant is reduced to lower service, class or grade without specifying the rank
to which he should be reduced in the lower service, class or grade or the period for which
he should be reduced, he is normally placed at the top of the lower service, class or grade.
In such cases he will be eligible for promotion when the next vacancy in the higher grade
occurs. In case such a vacancy arises immediately after a Government servant is reduced
to a lower grade or class and the delinquent Government servant is promoted to the higher
grade the intention underlying his reduction to a lower service or grade would be defeated.
In order to avoid such contingencies, the disciplinary authorities are requested to see that
while issuing orders imposing the penalty of reduction to a lower service, class or grade(a)
the rank to which the Government Servants concerned should be reduced in the lower
grade or service is expressly specified and (b) the period for which the reduction order
should be in effect, i.e., during which he shall not be considered for promotion, is
specifically mentioned. The result of such an order will be that the Government servant
cannot be promoted (i.e., restored) to the higher grade until the period expires. After the
period expires, he is not automatically restored to the higher grade but will be eligible to
be considered for promotion when the next vacancy occurs.
O.M.No.GAD (S-1)56 SSR 59, Bangalore,

dated the 9th October 1959.
Promotion of Government Servants whose conduct is under enquiry.
Government has had under consideration the question whether a Government servant
whose conduct is under enquiry should be considered for promotion if his seniority and
previous record of service apart from the case under enquiry justify it. It is now directed
that a Government servant on whom charge sheet has been served after a prima facie case
had been established against him should not be considered for promotion till the enquiry is
completed. In case the Government servant is exonerated in the enquiry held against him
and if his record of service is otherwise satisfactory as would entitle him for promotion, he
should be promoted immediately after completion of the departmental enquiry, his
seniority and rank remaining the same as would have been the case if there had been no
departmental enquiry instituted against him. The Secretariat Department and Heads of
Departments are requested to follow these instructions carefully in future.
O.M.No: 6400/58-15, dated 24th March 1960.

Sub:- States Reorganisation - Appeals against orders of dismissal, removal or
compulsory retirement from service passed by the pre-Reorganised Madras
State prior to 1st November 1956 - Authority to dispose of - Decisions of the
Government of India-Communicated.
Ref:- From the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, letter No.21/3/58-
SR(S), dated 5th February 1960.
It has been brought to the notice of the Government that several officers in the
service of the pre-Reorganised Madras State prior to 1st November 1956, who would in
the normal course have been allotted to Kerala or Mysore State consequent on the
Reorganisation of States, if they had been available for allotment just before the date of
Reorganisation, but were dismissed, removed or compulsorily retired from service before
that date, had before or after the date, preferred petitions or appeals against orders passed
in their case by the pre-Reorganised Madras State. The question as to the State
Government which should deal with such petitions or appeals, was examined by the
Government in consultation with the Government of India.
2. The Government have decided to accept the decision of the Government of India in
the matter and direct that the present Madras State which is the principal successor State in
respect of the pre-Reorganised Madras State, should consider and decide on merits any
appeal or petition preferred before or after the 1st November 1956 by an officer dismissed,
removed, or compulsorily retired from service prior to 1st November 1956. If on a
consideration of the merits of the case, it is decided by this Government to allow the
appeal after undergoing all the procedures and formalities prescribed therefor and to
reinstate the officer necessary orders should be passed by this Government and the officer
should be reinstated in this State. Thereafter, the question of the allocation of the officer
to the new Kerala or Mysore State, as the case may be, as if he was available for allotment
on the 31st October 1956 should be taken up for consideration. If it is decided to allot the
officer to any other State, the concurrence of the other State Government should be
obtained. In cases of disagreement, the Government of India in the Ministry of Home
Affairs, should be approached for passing necessary orders.
3. The Heads of Departments and the Departments of Secretariat are requested to take
action as outlined in para 2 above and dispose of the appeals or petitions already pending
with them and that may be received by them hereafter.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged.
O.M.No: GAD 49 DIF 59, dated 8th April 1960.

Sub:- Procedure in respect of Disciplinary matter.
Ref:- Circular letter No. GAD 36 DIF(Int) 58, dated 15th November 1958.
In paragraph 2 of Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, letter No.
21/3/58(S), dated 30th October 1958, a copy of which was forwarded to Heads of
Department and Secretaries to Government for information with the Circular letter
referred to above, it was suggested that appeals or petitions preferred before or after the
1st November 1956 by persons dismissed, removed or compulsorily retired from service
prior to 1st November 1956 should be disposed of by the principal successor State and in
case it was ultimately decided to reinstate the Government servant, the question of his
allocation will be decided in consultation with the State Governments concerned. It was
pointed out to the Government of India by certain State Governments that while following
this procedure, difficulties were likely to arise in the cases of persons who were serving in
an area which after reorganisation formed part of another State, as the conclusions arrived
at by the Government of the principal successor State might not necessarily be acceptable
to the Government of the other State and the latter might not agree to the reallocation of
that person to that State.
The Government of India have re-examined the matter in the light of the views
expressed by the State Governments and have decided as follows:-
(i) The principal successor State should consider and decide on merits any
appeal or petition preferred before or after the 1st November 1956 by an
officer dismissed, removed or compulsorily retired prior to 1st November
1956.
(ii) If on a consideration of the merits of the case, it is decided by the principal
successor State to allow the appeal and to reinstate the officer, necessary
orders may be passed by them and the officer should be reinstated in the
principal successor State. Thereafter, they may take up the question of the
allocation of the officer and deal with the matter as if the officer concerned
was available for allocation on the 31st October 1956.
(iii) If it is decided to allot the officer to any other State, the other Government's
concurrence should be obtained. In case of disagreement the Central
Government may be approached for passing necessary orders.
The above decisions of the Government of India are communicated to the Secretaries
to Government and Heads of Departments for information and future guidance in dealing
with cases of disciplinary proceedings initiated before or after 1st November 1956.
No.GAD 21 OSR 60, dated, Bangalore, 28th July1960 (Sravana 6, Saka Era 1882)
According to Sub-Rule (5) of Rule 11 of the Mysore Civil Services (Classification,
Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957, relating to the procedure for imposing major penalties, a
Government servant against whom Departmental proceeding are being held, can take the
assistance of another Government servant with the approval of the disciplinary authority,
in presenting his defence before the Enquiry Officer. Government had under
consideration in this behalf the question whether it is necessary to obtain in writing the
consent of the latter and is now pleased to direct that the disciplinary authority should
require the Government servant who desires another Government servant to assist him in
presenting his defence, to produce the consent of that Government servant in writing and
should also formally consult the Head of the Department concerned, before granting
approval.
By Order and in the name of the
Governor of Mysore,
Sd/-
B.R.Verma,
General Administration Department (O.M).
O.M.No: GAD 35 SSR 60, dated 15th October 1960.

Sub:- Dismissal of Government Servants in public services.
Ref:-1. Official Memorandum No. GAD 80 RSR 57, dated 9th May 1957.
2. Official Memorandum No. GAD 80 RSR 57, dated 4th January 1958.
3. Official Memorandum No. GAD 80 RSR 57, dated 4th February 1958.
In the Official Memoranda cited above instructions have been issued that all cases of
dismissals of Government Servants should be reported to the Chief Secretary to
Government in the General Administration Department (Services) every quarter for
notification in the Mysore Gazette. According to these instructions, the return should be
in the prescribed form and it should contain only the names of Government Servants (1)
whose statutory appeals, if any, against their dismissal has been disposed of; and (2) those
who have not preferred appeals against their dismissal within the time prescribed in the
rules for preferring such appeals.
2. Experience has shown that the compilation of the return at the end of each quarter
involves considerable labour and delay and that the purpose can equally be served by half-
yearly returns instead of quarterly returns. It has therefore, been decided that beginning
with the hlaf-year ending 31st December 1960, the return should be converted into a half
yearly return.
3. It is therefore directed that all the cases of dismissals of Government Servants should
be reported to Government every half year, in January and July. The return should
invariably be in the prescribed from as in the Annexure and each column in the form
should be correctly filled up without leaving any column blank. Nil returns should also be
sent.
ANNEXURE
FORM
1. Name of the Person dismissed :
2. Father's name :
3. Educational qualification :
4. Date and Place of birth :
5. Place of residence :
6. Marks of identification :
7. Post held :
8. Reasons for dismissal :
O.M.No.FD 92 SRS 60, dated: 1st December 1960.

Sub:- Clarification regarding Rule 59, Mysore Civil Services Rules.
Doubts have been expressed as to the exact interpretation of Rule 59 of the Mysore
Civil Services Rules, and therefore the following clarifications are issued for the
information and guidance of all concerned.
"Instruction" below Rule 59:-
"(a) Every order passed by a competent authority imposing on a Government
servant the penalty of reduction to a lower stage in a time-scale should
indicate.
(i) the date from which it will take effect and the period (in terms of years
and months) for which the penalty shall be operative;
(ii) the stage in the time-scale (in terms of rupees to which the Government
servant is reduced; and
(iii) the extent (in term of years and months) if any, to which the period
referred to at (i) above should operate to postpone future increments.
It should be noted that reduction to a lower stage in a time-scale is not permissible
under the rules either for an unspecified period or as a permanent measure. * Deleted by
on No. FD 17 SRS 76 Dated 28th September 1978 [Also when a Government servant is
reduced to a particular stage, his pay will remain constant at that stage for the entire period
of reduction.] The period to be specified under (iii) should in no case exceed the period
specified under the period specified under (i);
(b) The question as to what should be the pay of a Government servant on the
expiry of the period of reduction should be decided as follows:-
(i) If the order of reduction lays down that the period of reduction shall not
operate to post-pone future increments, the Government servant should
be allowed the pay which he would have drawn in the normal course but
for the reduction. If however, the pay drawn by him immediately before
reduction was below the efficiency bar he should not be allowed to cross
the bar except in accordance with the he provision of rule 52;
(ii) If the order specifies that the period of reduction was to operate to
postpone future increments for any specified period the pay of the
Government servant shall be fixed in accordance with (i) above but after
treating the period for which the increment were to be postponed as not
counting for increments.
CIRCULAR NO: GAD 59 OAC 61, dated 30th September 1961.

Sub:- Criminal misconduct-Government Servants- Procedure to be followed.
Several doubts have been expressed regarding the exact procedure to be followed in
cases of criminal misconduct, committed by Government Servants. The following
clarifications are issued in partial modification of instruction 20 of Procedural Instructions
issued in Official Memorandum No.GAD (OM) 3 CAR 57, dated 14th December 1957
and Circular No.GAD (S-1) 38 SSR 58, dated 30th October 1958, namely:-
1. Where officers are trapped or caught red-handed while accepting illegal gratification,
the investigation should be continued and completed and regular charge-sheet in the Court
of the concerned Special Judge should be filed.
2. Where cases are initiated by the police either suo motu or at the instance of the Head
of a Department, If on completion of the investigation it is found that the evidence
collected is not sufficient so as to warrant a conviction in a Court of law, the Anti-
Corruption Department or the Police Department, as the case may be, should consider and
move the concerned Court for obtaining the relevant summary for dropping the
proceedings. After obtaining such a summary the records of investigation should be
forwarded to the Head of the Department who should decide about the sufficiency of the
material for initiating a departmental enquiry under the M.C.S. (CCA) Rules, 1957 and
take action accordingly.
3. Where departmental enquiries have been started without reference to the Police, such
enquiries should be continued and completed according to the rules. If at any stage of the
enquiry the Disciplinary Authority considers that the offences disclosed are so grave that a
prosecution in a Court of law is essential in the interest of administration, then steps
should be taken to lunch regular prosecution and the Departmental enquiry should be kept
in abeyance.
4. It is impressed on all concerned that delay in the institution of criminal prosecution
not only frustrates the object of the prosecution but may possibly affect the credit to be
attached to the evidence that will be adduced in support of the prosecution. Delayed
prosecutions are looked upon with suspicion by Courts. It is essential therefore that
prosecution should normally be conceived at the earliest stage as soon as the offence is
committed and detected. If in any case there is delay in launching a prosecution, then such
cases should be continued only departmentally.
5. Where a prosecution ends in an order of acquittal, then the question of Departmental
enquiry does not arise if the accused has been acquitted on merits. If the order of acquittal
is on some technical ground, then the propriety of starting a Departmental enquiry should
be considered on the merits of each case after a careful scrutiny of the judgement.
O.M.No: GAD 12 OSR 61, dated 25th October 1961.

Sub:- Procedure to be followed in forwarding investigation papers to the Anti-
Corruption Department.
The Department of Anti-Corruption and Technical Audit (P.W.D) as at present
constituted is responsible for investigations into-
(a) the allegations of inefficiency and corruption against Gazetted Officers;
(b) to conduct Departmental Enquiries in cases where the Director, Anti-
Corruption, is appointed as an Enquiry Officer under Rule 14(A) of Mysore
Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957;
2. The above character of duties should not be construed to exclude the responsibility
of the heads of departments and the Secretaries to Government to look after the 'moral
health' of Government Servants working under their control.
3. With this object in view, it is necessary that whenever representations containing
allegations against Government Servants working in any department are received, the
supervisory officers should in the first instance carefully scrutinise the allegations to see if
'prima facie' the allegations are serious or frivolous. In the latter event, it will be for the
head of the department to give a summary disposal to the communication in question and
file the papers. Where, however, preliminary study discloses the desirability or necessity
of further probe, it will be the duty of the department to check on the allegations with
reference to the available records or other relevant material held in the Office. If after this
check more detailed and systematic investigation is considered desirable, a reference
should be made to the Director of Anti-Corruption. It will be necessary to send all records
connected with the allegations under references as well as the preliminary observations of
the Department to the Director of Anti-Corruption.
4. In no case the communication containing allegations against Gazetted or non-
Gazetted Officers should be sent "mechanically" to the Director, Anti-Corruption without
the considered views or observations of the department.
5. The Director of Anti-Corruption after conducting detailed investigations into the
cases remitted to him by concerned, departments, will formulate his view precisely
regarding the nature of allegations, the extent to which they have been substantiated by
facts and the Officers who are to be held answerable. He will also propose appropriate
action against the concerned officials, e.g., Departmental proceedings, Enquiry or
Summary, departmental proceedings under Rule 12 or Criminal proceedings in a Court of
Law.
6. The recommendation of the Director of Anti-Corruption on the above points together
with the records of preliminary investigation will be sent to the Secretary of the
Department concerned.
7. It will be the duty of the Secretary of the Department to examine the report of the
Director of Anti-Corruption and record of investigation and after careful examination,
obtain orders of Government on the following points:-
(a) Whether on the basis of the report of preliminary enquiry conducted by the
Director, Anti-Corruption, prima facie case for holding a Departmental
Enquiry has been made out or whether the case warrants criminal
prosecution in the Court of Law.
(b) If Departmental Enquiry is called for the Officer who should be appointed to
conduct the departmental enquiry (it need not in all cases be conducted by
the Director, Anti-Corruption. In fact, in large number of cases it will be
desirable to appoint Departmental Officers as Enquiry Officers.
(c) The officers against whom the enquiry is to be held and the charges on
which the enquiry should be held. For this purpose, it will be necessary for
the department to specify the proposed charges in the form of a draft.
(d) The nature of proceedings, namely, whether Rule 11 or Rule 12 of the
C.C.A. Rules should be applied. In the latter case it will not be necessary to
appoint an Officer as an Enquiry Officer. The required notices under Rule
12 would have to be issued by the Secretariat Departmental concerned.
(e) If enquiry under Rule 11 is decided upon, the time within which the enquiry
should be completed, and
(f) any other relevant instructions that Government may like to issue, e.g., in
cases where common proceedings are necessary against more than one
Officer, specific direction of the Government to this Department under the
relevant Rules would have to be issued.
O.M.No: GAD 14 OSR 61, dated 13th November 1961.

Sub:- Supply of copies of documents to the delinquent official.
Doubts often arise whether a particular document or set of documents asked for by
a Government servant in a Departmental enquiry may be made available to him or not.
The question of the extent of access to official records to which a Government servant is
entitled under sub-rule (3) of Rule 11 of the Mysore Civil Services (Classification, Control
and Appeal) Rules, 1957 has been examined in the light of the Official Memorandum
issued by the Government of India (Ministry of Home Affairs No.F-30-5-61-AVD dated
25th August 1961) and the following clarifications are issued regarding the access to
and/or supply of copies of the following documents to a Government servant:-
(1) Documents to which reference has been made in the statement of allegations;
A list of documents which are proposed to be relied upon to prove the charge and the
facts stated in the statement of allegations should be drawn up and supplied to the officer
along with the charge sheet or as soon thereafter as possible, and the officer be permitted
to inspect the documents mentioned in the list, if he so desires.
(2) Documents and records not so referred to in the statement of allegations but which
the Government servant concerned considers are relevant for the purpose of his defence;
Such a request should ordinarily be acceded to. But it is open to the Government to
deny inspection of these documents if in its opinion such records are not relevant to the
defence of the case or it is not desirable in public interest to permit inspections. Where
inspections or supply of copies of documents is denied, an order should be recorded in that
behalf assigning reasons for the denial.
(3) Statements of witnesses recorded in the course of (a) preliminary enquiry conducted
by the Department or (b) investigation made by the Police;
These statements can be used only for purposes of cross examination and the
Government servant is called upon to discredit only those witnesses relied upon by the
prosecution and as such the Government servant may be allowed access to the statements
only of those witnesses who are proposed to be examined in proof of the charges or the
facts stated in the statement of allegations, the demand for copies however being made
when the witnesses are called for examination at the time of oral enquiry. However if the
Government servant applies for copies of these statements the same may be furnished
sometime prior to the cross-examination of the witnesses.
(4) Reports submitted to Government or other competent authority including the
disciplinary authority by (a) an officer appointed to hold a preliminary inquiry to ascertain
facts, (b) by the Police after investigation;
Such reports other than those referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section
173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 are usually confidential and intended only to
satisfy the competent authority whether further action is called for, and as such it is not
necessary to permit the Government servant to inspect these reports. Any reference to
such reports in the statement of allegations should be avoided as otherwise it would not be
possible to deny access to these reports if required.
The procedure with regard to supply of copies and documents has been indicated in
O.M.No.GAD 8 OSR 59, dated 18th May 1959. It is not ordinarily necessary to supply
copies of the various documents and it is sufficient if the Government servant is given
such access as is permitted under the rules. A Government servant should not however be
permitted to take photostat copies of the documents.
No.GAD (S-1) 43 SRR 62 Mysore Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, dated 1st June, 1962.
Jyeshta 11, S.E. 1884.
CIRCULAR
According to Rule 11 (5) of the Mysore Civil Services (Classification, Control &
Appeal) Rules, 1957, Government servant against whom departmental proceedings are
taken can take the assistance of another Government servant with the approval of the
disciplinary authority in presenting his defence before the Enquiry Officer; but may not
engage a Legal Practitioner for the purpose, unless the person nominated by the
Disciplinary Authority or a specially empowered authority, as the case may be is a Legal
Practitioner. This is in lieu of the assistance of the Legal Practitioner. It implies that the
assisting Government Servant may do whatever a Legal Practitioner would do for his
Client i.e., to cross-examine witnesses examined in support of the charges, examine
defence witnesses and even argue.
It has been brought to the notice of Government that a Government servant
nominated under Rule 11 (5) of the said rules by an accused Government servant was not
permitted by an Enquiry Officer to cross-examine witnesses in support of the charges and
to argue the case for the defence, the contention being that Rule 11 (5) of the
Classification, Control and Appeal Rules, permits an accused Government servant to take
only the services of another Government servant and that such assistance cannot include
the right to cross-examine the witnesses and to argue the case. The procedure adopted by
the Enquiry Officer if this case is not correct. Government Servants are denied the benefit
or expert legal practitioner in defending themselves and whatever little assistance they
expect from their colleagues who are Government Servants, will be thwarted, if the
enquiry officer does not permit a Government servant whose assistance, another
Government servant takes under Rule 11(5) to cross-examine the witness. Government
servant assisting another Government servant under Rule 11(5) of the Classification,
Control and Appeal Rules should be permitted to do whatever a Lawyer would do for his
Client viz. to cross-examine witnesses examined in support of the charges, examine
defence witnesses and even argue the case.
Sd/-
B.Purushotham,
Uneder Secretary to Government,
General Administration Department,
(Services-1)
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
NO.GAD (S.1) 33 SSR 61, BANGALORE, DATED: 27-6-62.
(ASHADHA 6, SAKA ERA 1884)
Sub:Failure to follow the prescribed procedure laid down for departmental
proceedings against Government Servants for misconduct. Issue Instructions - reg.
The following questions in connection with the reinstatement of dismissed/removed/
discharged Government Servants whose services have been terminated, have been
considered.
1. Whether before the Government decide to reinstate an individual on grounds of
equity, the concurrence of the Finance Department should be obtained for payment of pay
and allowances for the intervening period, or whether the administrative authorities could
themselves, after following the prescribed procedure reinstate the person and sanction
payment of pay and allowances under Rule 99 of the Mysore Civil Services Rules.
2. Whether in cases of reinstatement on the grounds of dismissal/removal/discharge
from or termination of service being held by a Court of Law or by an Appellate/reviewing
authority to have been made without following the procedure required under Article 311
of the Constitution, payment of full pay and allowances for the intervening period is
automatic and compulsory.
3. As regards Question No.1, it has been decided that the concurrence of the Finance
Department will not be necessary for reinstating a Government servant if the authority
which reinstates the Government servant is competent to appoint him. The question as to
what pay and allowances should be allowed for the intervening period and whether or not
the period should be treated as duty will be dealt with under Rule 99 of the Mysore Civil
Services Rules.
4. Regarding Question No.2 stated in para 1 above, it has been decided that Rule 99 of
the Mysore Civil Service Rules is inapplicable in cases where dismissal/removal/discharge
from or termination of service is held by a Court of Law or by an Appellate/reviewing
authority to have been made without following the procedure required under Art. 311 of
the Constitution.
In Such cases:
(i) if it is decided to hold a further enquiry and the Government servant is
deemed to have been placed under suspension from the date of
dismissal/removal/ discharge/termination under Rule 10 of the Mysore Civil
Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957, the Government
servant will be paid a subsistence allowance from the date he is deemed to
have been placed under suspension, under Rule 98 of the Mysore Civil
Services Rules, 1958.
(ii) If the Government servant is not deemed to have been placed under
suspension as envisaged under (i) above, the payment of full pay and
allowances for the intervening period and treatment of that period as duty for
all purposes will be automatic and compulsory, provided that:-
(a) the arrears should be paid subject to the law of limitation -
(b) where the reinstated Government servant has secured employment during
any period between the dismissal/removal/discharge/termination and
reinstatement, the pay and allowances admissible to him after
reinstatement for the intervening period shall be reduced by the
emoluments earned by him during such employment unless the
emoluments earned by him exceeds the pay and allowances admissible to
him provided that the amount to be paid under (i) and (ii) above will be
determined subject to the directions, if any, in the decree of the Court
regarding arrears of salary.
5. As the dismissal/removal/discharge/termination of service of a Government servant

without following the procedure laid down in the Mysore Civil Services (Classification,
Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957, results in the payment of arrears by way of pay and
allowances, the need for meticulously observing the proper procedure in such cases is
once again impressed on all concerned. In all cases where the circumstances leading to a
Government servant's reinstatement reveal that the authority which terminated his
services, either wilfully did not observe, or through gross negligence failed to observe, the
proper procedure before terminating the services of any Government servant, proceedings
should be reinstituted against such authority under the Mysore Civil Services
(Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 and the question of recovering from such
authority the whole or part of the pecuniary loss arising from the reinstatement of the
Government should be considered.
No.GAD 6 SIN 62 Mysore Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
General Administration Department (Services -2),
Bangalore, dated 2nd April 1963.
Chaitra 12 Saka Era 1885.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub: Orders of dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement of Government
Servants from service set aside by Courts - Issue instructions for guidance of
competent authorities.
It has been brought to the notice of Government that in many cases there has been
undue delay on the part of competent authorities in taking appropriate action whenever an
order dismissing, removing or compulsorily retiring a Government servant from service
has been set aside by the Courts. Delays in such cases are not excusable. In order to
ensure that delays in such matters do not occur, Government are pleased to issue the
following instructions for the guidance of competent authorities.
2. According to sub-rule (4) of rule 10 of the Mysore Civil Service (Classification,
Control & Appeal) Rules, 1957, when a penalty of dismissal, removal or compulsory
retirement from service imposed on a Government servant is set aside or declared to
render void in a consequence of a decision of a court of law, if the Disciplinary Authority,
on a consideration of the circumstances of the case, decides to hold a further enquiry, the
Government servant shall be deemed to have been placed under suspension by the
Appointing Authority from the date of the original order of dismissal, removal or
retirement and shall continue to remain under suspension until further orders.
Consequently, the question of reinstatement of the concerned Government Servant should
be decided after considering the feasibility of holding a fresh or a further enquiry into the
matter. There may be cases where the competent authority finds that it is not expedient to
hold a fresh or further enquiry because by lapse of time, evidence which was originally
available is not longer available. In such cases, a decision should be taken, and where the
original order had been the subject matter of an appeal to a higher authority with the
approval of that authority, and the Government servant should be reinstated as soon as
possible after the orders of the Court.
3. In cases where it is decided to hold a fresh or a further enquiry, it is open to the
competent authority to reinstate the Government servant concerned if his continuance on
duty would not prejudice the fresh or further enquiry so instituted or the gravity of the
misconduct is not such as to be in-expedient in public interests to allow him to hold office.
The important question will be whether in the light of the charges, the Govt. servant may
be allowed to function in office or should be continued under suspension. Any decision
for reinstatement depends on the decision of the competent authority on this question.
4. Where an appeal is preferred against the decision of the Court no action should be
taken under these instructions except with the approval of the Government.
5. The above instructions should be followed scrupulously and no delay should be
allowed to occur between the date of the direction of a Court and action by the competent
authority consequent upon the decision.
Sd/-
K.Narayanaswamy,
Chief Secretary to Government.
No.GAD 46 OAC 64 Mysore Government Secretariat,

Vidhana Soudha,Bangalore,
dated the 16th June 1964.
Jyeishta 26, SE. 1886.
CIRCULAR
Sub:- Requisitions for Records required for purposes of investigations and
inquiries by officers of the Anti-corruption Department -
In Circular No.GAD 18 EAD 57 dated the 26th March 1957, all Heads of
Departments, Divisional Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners were instructed to
comply promptly and without under delay, all requisitions from the Special Officer (now
Director Anti-Corruption) for any record, report or information required for purposes of
investigation. The Director, Anti-Corruption and Inspection has brought to notice of
Government that some offices are not complying with the requisition of the Investigating
Officers of his Department on a literal interpretation of the Circular mentioned above and
that in order to avoid delay in sending every requisition for record under his signature, he
has suggested that requisition signed by him or by any officer authorised by him may be
accepted and acted upon by all officers.
2. On a consideration of all aspects of the matter it is hereby clarified that all
requisitions for records, reports etc., received from the Director, Anti-Corruption and
Inspection or any Gazetted Officer under him may be accepted and honored by all
Presiding Officers incharge of Government Offices and institutions. If in any case the
head of the Office feels that any particular document or record should not be made
available to the Officer of the Anti-Corruption Department, he has to report the facts of the
case and the reasons for withholding the document and seek orders of his immediate
superior gazetted officer and intimate the anti corruption department of the action taken.
Such authority has to consider the matter in all aspects without delay and explain the
reasons why any document is withheld.
3. These instructions may be communicated to all concerned for guidance.
P. Venkatraman,
Deputy Secretary to Government,
General Administration
Department
(Political & O & M)
No.GAD 31 SRR 64 Mysore Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, dated: 24-11-1964
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub: Instructions regarding preparation and submission of half yearly returns of
dismissed Government Servants.
Ref:1. O.M.No.GAD 80 RSR 57, dt: 9-5-1957.
2. O.M.No.GAD 80 RSR 57, dt: 4-1-1958.
3. O.M.No.GAD 80 RSR 57, dt: 4-2-1958.
4. O.M.No.GAD 35 SSR 60, dt: 15-10-1960.
Instructions have been issued in the Official Memorandum cited above that all cases
of dismissal of Government Servants should be reported to the Chief Secretary to
Government in General Administration Department every half year in the prescribed
proforma for notifying in the Mysore Government Gazette.
To avoid the present cumbrors procedure of reporting cases of dismissal of
Government Servants to Government in General Administration Department for
consolidation and then forwarding the copies of such notifications to all the Appointing
Authorities under the State Government and other State Government for information and
guidance, Government consider that it would be appropriate if all such information is sent
to the Deputy Inspector General of Police (CID) of the State as this will facilitate the
Deputy Inspector General of Police (CID) to have a proper check of all cases referred to
him for verification of the character and antecedents of candidates selected for
appointment to public services. Deputy Inspector General of Police (CID) will have to
maintain a record of such names for giving the required certificate whenever asked for by
any appointing authority. Generally, persons convicted of offences involving moral
turpitude or who have been dismissed from service or debarred for future employment by
the Government of India or any State Government or any Local Body should be deemed
ineligible for appointments under the Mysore Government.
It is therefore directed that particulars of all cases of Government servants dismissed
from service or debarred from future employment under the Government should in future
be forwarded by the Heads of Department/Appointing Authority to the Deputy Inspector
General of Police (CID) Bangalore of the State and to the Superintendent of Police of the
District where the Government servant concerned is a permanent resident in the form
enclosed instead of sending them to Government in the General Administration
Department. These lists should be sent before the 5th of every month and if there are no
instances of dismissals etc., a 'nil' reports should be sent, the Deputy Inspector General of
Police (CID) will compile the information so received from all Heads of
Department/appointing authorities and publish a consolidated list received, by the 5th June
and 5th December in the Mysore Government Gazette once in six months. The Deputy
Inspector General of Police (CID) will circulate a copy of this list to the Director, Central
Intelligence Bureau, New Delhi and Deputy Inspector General of Police (CID) of other
State Governments. There is no need to circulate a copy of this list to the Heads of
departments or to the Recruiting Authorities in Mysore State. They will however check-
up from the Mysore Gazette whether any of the candidates selected for appointment have
either been dismissed or debarred from services. The Inspector General of Police (CID)
will also similarly collect names of such dismissed / debarred, persons from the Director
of Central Intelligence Bureau, New Delhi and Deputy Inspector General of Police (CID)
of other State Governments. Whenever Heads of Departments and Appointing Authorities
have to make appointments of persons from other states they should make a reference to
the Deputy Inspector General of Police (CID), as to the character and antecedents of such
persons.
In the case of dismissed/debarred State Government Servants who are permanent
residents of Calcutta, Bombay, Madras, such particulars should be sent by the Deputy
Inspector General of Police (CID) Bangalore to the Commissioner or the Deputy
Commissioner of Police who is incharge of Special Branch in those State Governments.
The Deputy Inspector General of Police (CID), Bangalore is also requested to collect
similar particulars of persons who are permanent residence in the cities of Calcutta,
Bombay and Madras and who have been dismissed or debarred from State Government
service.
The above procedure is also applicable to all Panchayat Municipalities, District and
Taluk Boards and other Local Bodies and State Government Undertakings. The
Administrative Departments of the Secretariat are therefore requested to issue suitable
instructions to the Local Bodies and Public Undertakings under them to send particulars of
dismissed/debarredofficials employed under them to the Deputy Inspector General of
Police (CID) of the State through their Heads of Department.
sd/-
C.K.Seshadri,
Deputy Secretary to Government
GAD (Pol. and O.M.)
Annexure to Official Memorandum No.GAD 31 SRR 64,

dt: 24-11-1964.
FORM
Name of the Person dismissed :
Father's name :
Educational qualification :
Date and Place of birth :
Place of residence :
Marks of identification :
Post held :
Reasons for dismissal :
CONFIDENTIAL
Sub:- Public Service-circumstances under which a Government servant may be
placed under suspension-instructions regarding.
No.GAD 21 SSR 65 Mysore Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, dated 26th Feb. 1965.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
On the recommendation of the Committee on Prevention of Corruption, the
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs have issued certain instructions, in their
Confidential Official Memorandum No.43/56/64-AVD dated 22-10-1964, for
consideration of the disciplinary authority as a guiding factor when Central Government
Servants may be placed under suspension. Based on these instructions, the State
Government have decided that while public interest should be the guiding factor in
deciding to place a Government servant under suspension, and the disciplinary authority
should have the discretion to decide this taking all factors into account the following
circumstances are indicated in which a disciplinary authority may consider it appropriate
to place Government servant under suspension. These are only intended for guidance and
should not be taken as mandatory.
(i) Cases where continuance in office of the Government servant will prejudice
the investigation, trial or any enquiry (e.g.apprehended tampering with
witnesses or documents);
(ii) Where the continuance in office of the Government Servant is likely to
seriously subvert discipline in the office in which the public servant is
working;
(iii) Where the continuance in office of the Government servant will be against
the wider public interest (other than those covered by (i) and (ii) such as
there is a public scandal and it is necessary to place the Government servant
under suspension to demonstrate the policy of the Government to deal
strictly with officers involved in such scandals particularly corruption,
(iv) Where allegations have been made against the Government servant and the
preliminary inquiry has revealed that a prima facie case is made out which
would justify his prosecution or his being proceeded against in departmental
proceedings, and whether the proceedings are likely to end in his conviction
and/or dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement from service.
NOTE:
(a) In the first three circumstances, the disciplinary authority may exercise his
discretion to place a Government servant under suspension even then the
case is under
investigation and before a primafacie case has been established.
(b) Certain types of misdemeanor where suspension may be desirable in the four
circumstances mentioned are indicated below:-
(i) any offence or conduct involving moral turpitude.
(ii) corruption, embezzlement or misappropriation of Government money,
possession of disproportionate assets, misuse of official powers for
personal gain.
(iii) serious negligence and dereliction of duty resulting in considerable loss to
Government.
(iv) desertion of duty;
(v) refusal or deliberate failure to carry out written orders of superior
officers.
In respect of the type of misdemeanour specified in sub-clauses (iii), (iv) and (v)
discretion has to be exercised with care.
The Secretaries to Government and Heads of Department are requested to being the
above instruction to the notice of all concerned confidentially for guidance.
sd/-
C.R.Sheshadri,
GAD., (POL., & O & M)
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, dated the 23rd March 65.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Public Services - Departmental Proceedings against Government Servants
involved in cases of fraud, embezzlement, loss of Government money etc.
instructions-
Ref: Circular No.GAD (S-1) 38 SSR dated, 30th October 1958.
Instances have come to the notice of Government where prompt action has not
been taken against Government Servants involved in loss of Government money due to
fraud, embezzlement, etc., It is very important to avoid delay in such cases in investigation
since any delay in taking action either departmentally or by recourse to original
proceedings results in loss to Government in as much as the amounts misappropriated
become irrecoverable due to the fact the Government Servants concerned either retire or
are dead.
2) It has also been noticed that in cases of fraud or embezzlement by Government
Servants, there is a tendency on the part of the Head of the Office or a Department to
consider that lodging a criminal complaint saves the trouble of initiating departmental
proceedings and is therefore easier to have recourse to it. As soon as cases of loss of
Government money come to notice, prompt action should be taken to investigate the same
and fix the responsibility, both directed and indirect for the loss on the persons involved
and to decide as to who among them should be prosecuted or in whose cases departmental
proceedings would suffice or are possible irrespective of the decisions to prosecute all or
some of the delinquents in a Court of Law, departmental proceedings may be commenced
against all of them without undue delay and such proceedings should be carried as far as
possible, short of the stage of recording of a finding and imposing a penalty, before the
case against those whom it is decided to prosecute is put in Court. When a charge sheet is
filed against any one of the delinquents in a Court of Law, the departmental proceedings
against him should be stayed. It should be formally resumed or concluded or dropped
according to the merits of the case after the decision of the court is available. If the
subject matter of the charge-sheet in a criminal court is also a point of issue or relevant
fact with respect to disciplinary proceedings against other delinquents, then the entire
proceedings shall have to be stayed, and if the subject matter of the charge-sheet in a Court
of Law and the charge framed in the disciplinary proceedings against the other delinquents
are not the same but distinct, then the departmental proceedings should be continued. The
stage upto which departmental proceedings prior to prosecution, should be taken must
however depend on the circumstances of each case and cannot be precisely defined.
Where it appears that recourse to judicial proceedings is likely to be involved, competent
legal advice should be taken by the departments concerned and where there is a reasonable
suspicion of fraud or other criminal offence, a prosecution should be the rule unless the
legal advisers consider that evidence available is not such as will secure a conviction. If
the accused government servant is convicted by the court and awarded an adequate
sentence the departmental proceedings against him should be formally completed and
proceedings against other delinquents continued. If the accused is not convicted, or the
accused is inadequately punished, the departmental proceedings against him will be
resumed as also against the remaining delinquent government Servants.
3. As regards the question of taking action against government Servants who by their
failure to prevent fraud or embezzlement have also become responsible for the loss of
government money, in the case of such government Servants also departmental
proceedings should be commenced along with the actual miscreants without any delay
irrespective of the question of prosecuting them in a court of law. However, it may not be
possible to take a final position on the charges against such government Servants until the
Court's findings against such principle offenders are available. The administrative
authority concerned should decide on the basis of the facts and records of each case how
far and in what cases he can proceed departmentally at once against such government
Servants. It is difficult to lay down any hard and fast rule when the departmenta
proceedings against such a Government Servants. It is difficult to lay down any hard and
fast rule when the departmental proceedings against such a government Servants without
assuming or even referring to the guilt of the principle offenders and without pre-judging
the issue before the court and thus avoid committing contempt of court. The authorities
concerned will have to find out that the evidence already avoidable would be sufficient
and in any case they may get written copies of such documents as may have to be put in a
Court.
4. All Heads of Departments are requested to go through these instructions carefully
and bring them to the notice of all concerned. The departmental proceedings of loss of
government money should be dealt with as expeditiously as possible and where the loss of
government money is due to failure on the part of the officers concerned for proper
supervision of accounts, the matter will have to be viewed seriously in accordance with
these instructions.
Sd/-
K.Balachandran,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, dated 29th Dec. 1965.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Preparation and submission of half-yearly returns of dismissed/debarred
Government Servants - Further instructions regard -
Ref:- O.M.NO.GAD 31 SRR 64 dated 24th November 1964.
Instructions have been issued in the Official Memorandum cited above, that all cases
of dismissal of Government Servants should be reported to the Deputy Inspector General
of Police (C.I.D.) Bangalore for compilation and publication in the Mysore Government
Gazette. Generally persons convicted of offences involving moral turpitude or who have
been dismissed from service/debarred from future employment by the Government of
India or any State Government or any Local Body are deemed ineligible for appointments
under the Government of Mysore.
It has come to the notice of Government that a certain Heads of a department
included in the list of dismissed Government Servants, the name of a local candidate
whose services were terminated on the expiry of the leave vacancy and also due to his
misconduct. It was also stated that his services would, in the normal course, have been
terminated with the reporting to duty of the regularly recruited candidate as he was only a
local candidate.
It is hereby clarified that the returns of dismissed/debarred Government Servants
should include only the names of Government Servants on whom the penalty of dismissal
from service has been imposed as a result of disciplinary action taken against them under
the Mysore Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules. It should also include
the names of Government Servants who have been dismissed from service as a result of
conviction for criminal offices. Termination of services of a local candidate as a result of
any other cause viz., ceasing of that vacancy, termination of leave vacancy, otherwise than
as a penalty cannot be creation for inclusion of names in the list of dismissed/debarred
Government Servants. Every Government servant has a right to appeal to the extent and
to the authorities as provided for under the Mysore Civil Services (Classification, Control
& Appeal) Rules against the orders imposing any of the penalties specified in the said
rules. It is not therefore appropriate to include the names of any dismissed Government
Servants in the list of dismissed Government Servants until after the expiry of the period
allowed for such appeal or if an appeal is made within the period, till the disposal of the
appeal.
The Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are requested to observe
these instructions while sending the returns to the Deputy Inspector General of Police
(C.I.D.) Bangalore.
K.S.N.Murthy,
Dy. Secy. to Government,
(Services)
Chief Secretariat
(GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT)
No.GAD 171 SSR 63, dated 2nd Feb. 1966
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub :- Departmental enquiries under Rule 14 of the Mysore Civil Services

(Classification,
Control & Appeal) Rules, 1957. Issues Clarifications re.-
Rule 14 of the Mysore Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules,
1957, (as amended by Notification No.GAD 62 SSR 65, dated 21st August 1965),
provided that, where an officer against whom a departmental enquiry is initiated has
absconded, or where such officer does not take part in the inquiry or where for any reasons
to be recorded in writing, it is impracticable to communicate with him, or where the
Disciplinary Authority, for reasons to be recorded in writing, is satisfied that it is not
reasonably practicable to follow the procedure prescribed in the said rules, the
Disciplinary Authority may consider the circumstances of the case and pass such orders
thereon as it deems fit.
2. The circumstances in which an inquiry can be proceeded within the absence of an
accused person are clearly laid down in the rule itself. However, as it is necessary in all
such cases to ensure that no irregularity in the procedure occurs which may vitiate the
orders passed, the following clarifications are hereby issued for the information of all the
Disciplinary and Inquiring Authorities:-
(a) The Disciplinary Authority should satisfy himself that there are
circumstances warranting an ex-parte inquiry and pass an order in that
behalf:
(b) Thereafter the Inquiring Authority should bring on record the evidence in
support of the charge or charges and record his findings and submit his
report to the Disciplinary Authority;
(c) The Disciplinary Authority shall consider the record of such enquiry and
after satisfying himself that the charge or charges are proved, pass further
orders.
sd/-
K.Balachandran,
Chief Secretariat
(GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT)
Circular No.GAD 18 SSR 66 dated 2nd March 1966
CIRCULAR
Instructions to officers to offer co-operation in giving evidence, etc., in any Enquiry

by Enquiry Officers during enquiry proceedings under C.C.A. Rules and Vigilance
Commission Rules.
Issues-
It has been reported by the Director of Vigilance that a Senior Officer of
Government was reluctant to come before the Enquiry Officer and give evidence in a
disciplinary proceedings. Even when he came, he raised all sorts of objections to answer
the questions during the time of cross-examination.
A witness has no right to content that the question put to him is irrelevant. It is
entirely left to the discretion of the enquiry officer to decide as to the nature of the
questions that may be put to witnesses. Since Government's intention in framing the
C.C.A. Rules and also in conducting enquiries is to find out the truth as to whether any
allegation made against an officer is proved or not, it is the duty of every Government
servant to come and give evidence before an Enquiry Officer irrespective of the fact
whether the accused officer is a subordinate or not.
Therefore, it is hereby impressed that all officers/Government Servants should offer
their fullest co-operation to the Vigilance Commission in any enquiry without any mental
reservation, either during the examination-in-chief or during cross-examinations.
sd/-
K.S.N.Murthy,
(Services).
No.GAD 80 SSR 65. Mysore Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, dated 11th April, 1966.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Promotion of Government Servants involved in Departmental Enquiries.
Instructions have been issued in Official Memorandum No.GAD (S.1) 56 SSR 59,
dated 9th October 1959 in the matter of promotion of Officers whose conduct comes under
Departmental enquiry and who are subsequently exhonerated.
2. Government have considered the question further and in modification of the
instructions contained in the Official Memorandum cited in para 2 above, hereby issue the
following instructions for the guidance of the appointing and disciplinary authorities.
(a) While considering the question of promotion of a Government Servant from
one grade to another, the fact that a departmental enquiry is pending against
him whatever may be the stage of the enquiry, should not be taken into
consideration except in those cases where the Government Servant is under
suspension. In determining the quantum of punishment at the culmination of
the enquiry, the fact that the Officer has in the meantime been promoted may
of course be taken into account.
(b) If the offence for which a departmental enquiry is started against a
Government Servant is so serious that his further promotion would not be in
public interest, the Government Servant concerned should be placed under
suspension forthwith and the question of his promotion, if any, should be
decided after completion of the enquiry in accordance with instructions
issued in O.M. dated 9-10-1959.
3. All Departmental enquiries should be completed within a period of six months in
order to avoid hardships to the accused Government Servants. Officers and Officials
responsible for delay in holding and finalising departmental enquiries will be held
personally responsible, if inordiante delays come to Government's notice.
sd/-
K.Balachandran,
No.ED 34 RPS 67. Mysore Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, dated 27th April 67,
Vysk.7 Saka Era 1889.
CIRCULAR
Ref:- Letter No.G.6598, dated 15-12-1966 from the Compiler, Mysore Gazette.
A number of Notifications or notices regarding unauthorised absence of Government
Servants of Class-III and Class-IV are being received in the office of the Compiler,
Mysore Gazette, for publication in the Mysore Gazette. In some cases, the Government
Servants who have been repatriated or reverted back to the parent Department do not
immediately report to duty inspite of instructions or do not resume duty inspite of recall
notice when they are on leave, or do not obey the transfer orders and remain absent
unauthorisedly. The question whether publication of such notifications or notices in the
Mysore Gazette is necessary, particularly in view of the need for economy in Government
expenditure, has been examined and the following instructions are issued for the guidance
of all the concerned:-
In view of the provisions contained in Rules 106-A to 108 of the M.C.S. Rs, it is not
necessary to publish in the Government gazette all the notices, Memos etc., served on the
Government Servants who are absent anauthorisedly. Only the final notice in cases where
the Government Servants have not replied to the usual notice or in cases when the
whereabouts of the Government Servants are not known for a considerable time and when
disciplinary action is proposed to be taken need be published in the Mysore Gazette for
information as it is a statutory requirement. Unless such a notice is published in the
Mysore Gazette, no action can be taken to terminate the services of any Government
Servant who is absconding or has remained absent unauthorisedly for a long time.
No.GAD 42 PVC 66. Mysore Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, dated 5th August, 1967.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Stipulation of time limit for completing the Departmental Enquiry entrusted by
government to the State Vigilance Commission.
It has been brought to the notice of Government by the State Vigilance Commission,
that the disciplinary authority while entrusting the enquiry to the District Officers are
stipulating time limit when enquiry officers are appointed under Rule 11 (2) of the Mysore
Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1957.
Disciplinary authorities need not stipulate any time limit when enquiry officers are
appointed under Rule 11 (2) of the Mysore Civil Services (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules 1957, and Enquiries entrusted to them.
If the disciplinary authority so desire it may separately cause a letter to be issued to
the Enquiry Officer impressing on him the need for completion of the Enquiry as early as
possible for reasons to be stated in writing such as, the accused Officer being kept under
suspension, or his reaching the age of superannuation within a short period time, or such
other reasons as may be warranted in the case.
sd/-
B.R.Deenadayal,
(General)
Copy of letter No.GAD 54 SRR 67, dated 14/16th September 1967 from the Chief
Secretary to the Government of Mysore, Bangalore, addressed to the State Vigilance
Commissioner, Bangalore.
Sub:- Continuance of Departmental Proceedings after retirement - Application of
new Rule 214 of M.C.S. Rs.
With reference to your note bearing No.ADM.1996-120/ 66-67 dated 28th March
1967, on the above subject, I am directed to state that the matter has been got examined
and it is clarified that disciplinary proceedings under C.C.A. Rules cannot be continued
after the retirement of an officer, but that such proceedings may be continued or initiated
as departmental proceedings under Rule 214 of Mysore Civil Service Rules, if
circumstances of the case satisfy the conditions of this Rule.
2. In a case, therefore, where disciplinary proceedings have been started prior to the
retirement of the officer or during re-employment and if such proceedings were to be
continued as departmental proceedings after retirement or final retirement, as the case may
be, it would be necessary to make an order that the proceedings shall be continued as
departmental proceedings for purposes of Rule 214 after the retirement of the officer.
sd/-
R.Thippoji Rao,
General Adminstration Department
(Services).
(FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
O.M.No.FD 133 SRS 67 dated 3rd January 1968
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Withholding/Withdrawal of Pension under Rule 214 of the Mysore Civil Services Rules
Issues clarifications re.-
According to proviso (a) of Rule 214 of the Mysore Civil Services Rules,
departmental proceedings, if instituted while the officer was in service, whether before his
retirement or during his re-employment, shall, after the final retirement of the officer, be
deemed to be proceedings under the said Rule and shall be continued and concluded by the
authority by which it was commenced in the same manner as if the officer had continued
in service. A question has been raised whether in the case of an officer whose case falls
within the purview of the aforesaid proviso and proceedings against whom were instituted
by an authority subordinate to the Governor, order for withdrawal/withholding of pension
can be passed by the subordinate authority on the conclusion of the proceedings or that
authority should refer the case to the Governor for final orders. The matter has been
considered and the undersigned is directed to clarify that the function of the Disciplinary
Authority is only to reach a finding on the charges and to submit a report recording its
findings to Government. It is then for the Government to consider the findings and take a
final decision under Rule 214 of the Mysore Civil Services Rules. In case Govt. decide to
take action under Rule 214 of M.C.S.Rules in the light of the findings of the Disciplinary
Authority, the Government will serve the person concerned with a show-cause notice
within such time as may be specified by the Government. The Government will consider
the reply and consult the Mysore Public Service Commission. If as a result of such
consideration in consultation with the Commission, it is decided to pass an order under
Rule 214 of M.C.S. Rs. necessary orders will be issued in the name of the Governor.
The procedure outlines in the preceding paragraph in regard to the issue of show-
cause notice will also apply to a case where the Governor functions as the Disciplinary
Authority.
sd/-
C.N.Subba Rao,
Special Officer,
Finance Department (Pensions).
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, dated the 26th June 1968.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Procedurein Disciplinary cases - Withholding of increments.
In Para 3 of Circular No.GAD (S-1) 35 SSR 58 dated 8th January 1959 the
Government have pointed out that reduction in pay or postponement of the increment with
retrospective effect, except where the pay is held up at an efficiency bar, is a major penalty
which attracts the provisions of Article 311 (2) of the Constitution. It would follow that if
the procedure prescribed under the Mysore Civil Services (Classification, Control &
Appeal) Rules, 1957 for the imposition of a major penalty is not followed, the enquiry
proceedings would become vitiated and the penalty would become illegal.
Inspite of these clear instructions, it has come to the notice of the Government that
increments, which had accrued due but were not actually granted and paid to the
concerned Government servant, are being ordered to be withheld under Rule 12 of the
C.C.A. Rules as a measure of penalty. On a Write Petition filed by the aggrieved
Government servant against the said punishment, the High Court of Mysore has held that
such a punishment is a major punishment as it would amount to reduction in pay and
consequently, a reduction in rank, and that the procedure laid down in Rule 11 of the
C.C.A. Rules Should have been followed.
The attention of all the Disciplinary and Appellate authorities under the C.C.A.
Rules is once again invited to the legal position that an increment which had already
accrued due, can be stopped/withheld only in case where an enquiry under Rule 11 of the
C.C.A. Rules has been held.
sd/-
W.A.Smith,
(Service Rules).
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, dated the 17th September 1968.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Publication of Notices in respect of Departmental proceedings against
Government Servants.
In Circular No.ED 34 TPS 67 dated 27th April 1967, it has been brought to the
notice of the Disciplinary Authorities that in cases where a Government Servant is
absconding or has remained absent unauthorisedly for a long time, it is necessary that a
notice specifying the penalty to be imposed should be published in the Mysore Gazette.
2. In clarification of the abovesaid Circular, the Disciplinary Authorities are hereby
informed that it is not necessary to publish along with the notice a copy of the enquiry
report or other document concerned in the enquiry. Legal requirements would be met if
only the notice containing briefly the substance of the charges held to be proved, the
penalty proposed to be imposed and directing the delinquent official to submit his
explanation within a fixed time after publication in the Mysore Gazette be published in the
Mysore Gazette. The Disciplinary Authority can proceed to pass final orders only after
the expiry of the period mentioned in the notice.
3. This Procedure should also be followed in cases where ex-parte proceedings in
accordance with rule 14 of Mysore Civil Service (C.C.A) Rules and the instructions
contained in Official Memorandum No.GAD 171 SSR 63 dated 2nd February 1966 are
conducted.
sd/-
W.A.Smith,
(Service Rules).
No.GAD 57 PVC 68 Mysore Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 18th-21st October 1968.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Disposal of cases received from the State Vigilance Commission -Stipulation
of time limit.
Under the Mysore State Vigilance Commission Rules 1965 after the enquiry into
any particular case has been completed, the State Vigilance Commission will forward to
the Government, the records of the case with the findings of the Inquiry Officer and its
recommendations thereon. Thereafter, the concerned Secretariat Department has to
examine the case in consultation with the Public Service Commission, where such
consultation is necessary under the Mysore Public Service Commission (Consultation)
Regulations, 1958, and obtain orders of the Government by placing the subject before the
Cabinet, if necessary.
2. I had an opportunity to scrutinise and discuss some of the pending cases with the
concerned secretaries. It was found that in many cases, there was unconscionable delay in
taking a decision and/passing final orders of Government in certain cases, well over two
years have elapsed since the recommendations of the Commission were received, but
formal orders of Government have still to issue.
3. Most of the cases have to pass through the following stages where, in varying
degrees, delays are caused:-
(1) Delay in examination of the recommendations of the Vigliance Commission:
Normally, it should not be difficult for the Department to carefully go through the
recommendations of the Commision together with the relevant records in any particular
case within a period of two to three weeks from the date of the receipt of the papers from
the Commission. At any rate, as all Vigilance cases have to be accorded very high priority,
there is no reason why delay in examination at this stage should not be out to the bearest
minimum.
(2) Delay in issue of Show Cause Notice to the accused official:
In fact, there is no justification for the delay at this stage because after the case has
been examined in the light of the recommendation of the Commission, in most cases the
issue of show cause notice calling upon the accused to furnish his explanation against the
punishment proposed, is an inevitable step. All this is required after the necessary
examination has been done, is to draft the notice and this need not take more than one or
two days.
(3) Reply to the Show Cause Notice:
Normally, a time limit of 15 days is specified in the show cause notice. This should
be adhered to rigidly and in no case more than one week's extra grace period should be
allowed. The total time accounted by this stage of the proccedings: i.e., between the issue
of the show cause notice and the receipt of the reply, must not exceed three weeks.
(4) Examination of the reply from the accused Officer to the Show Cause Notice:
There is no reason why such an examination should take more than a week, at the
end of which the Department should be ready with its provisional conclusions regarding
the penalty to be imposed.
(5) Reference to the Public Service Commission:
Making of the reference to the Public Service Commission involves only drafting of
the letter to the Secretary, Public Service Commission. This should not take more than a
day or two. The Commission could be specifically requested to accord their concurrence
or their views on the findings of Government in the case under reference as also on the
punishment proposed, within a period of 4 to 6 weeks from the date of reference.
(6) Passing of final orders:
The reply of the Public Service Commission to Government's proposals will be
either concurrence or suggestions for modificatioins in the findings and quantum or nature
of punishment. Final orders can issue, immediately if the Commission agrees with the
proposals of Government otherwise the Department has to decide whether it should
modify its own stand regarding the punishment etc., to conform to the views of the
commission or stick to its original proposal. In the former case when it is sought to accept
the modification suggested by the Public Service Commission, there should be no
difficulty in issuing final orders on this basis straight away. In the latter event, the
Department will have to bring the matter before the Cabinet. There again, as a Cabinet
meeting is held every week, it should not be difficult to obtain the orders of the Cabinet
within a period of a week to ten days from the date of receipt of the papers from the Public
Service Commission. Final orders of the Government on the basis of the decision of the
Cabinet should issue within a period of few days from the date of intimation of this
decision.
Total time:
It will be seen that the toal time taken up in various stages from the date of the
receipt of the report or the recommendations of the Vigilance Commission to the date of
issue of final orders must not exceed 14, or say, 15 weeks. Making allowance for the
possible back reference from the Public Service Commission another 4 weeks can be
added to this period increasing the permissible aggregate time limit to 20 weeks.
4. My examination of a few long-pending cases has disclosed that a good deal of time
is wasted in making needless reference to Law Department. For example, it is not always
necessary for the draft show cause notice to be put up to the Law Department for vetting.
Similarly, the final order imposing the punishment could ordinarily issue without prior
scrutiny of the draft by the Law Department. Only where specific legal issues are
involved, in respect of which precedents or case law have not been established and the
Department is likely to go wrong, if it acted on its own judgement, the matter should be
referred to the Law Department for advice. In majority of cases, the various steps of
procedure to be gone through are clear and simple drafting of the show cause notice or the
order of punishment should present no serious difficulty requiring guidance of the Law
Department.
5. Another misconception which has contributed to a good deal of delay in certain
cases is that a second reference to the Vigilance Commission is considered necessary
when the Public Service Commission have suggested modification of the findings and
punishment proposed by Government, especially because of the conclusions of
Government are based on the recommendations of the Vigilance Commission. Such a
reference is only unnecessary and must be avoided. It is for Government to take a view as
to whether the modification suggested by the Public Service Commission should be agreed
to or not. Further advice of the Vigilance Commission at this stage need not be sought.
6. All Departmental Secretaries are requested to kindly consider those observations
carefully and make special efforts to ensure that final orders of Government in all
disciplinary cases, where recommendations of the Vigilance Commission have been
received, are passed expeditiously. In no case, the total time required for processing and
issue of final orders should exceed a period of 20 weeks. Wherever this time limit is
exceeded, a detailed report on the reason for delay should be made to this office.
R.N.Vasudeva,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 8th January 1969.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Publication of notices, etc, in respect of departmental proceedings against
Government servants -
In Official Memorandum No. GAD 47 SSR 68 dated 17th September 1968 the need
for publication in the Mysore Gazette of substance of notice indicating the charges held to
be proved and the penalty proposed to be imposed, etc. against a delinquent Government
servant whose whereabouts are not known has been indicated. It is further clarified that to
meet the requirement of law, it is also necessary to publish in the Gazette a notice that
final order has been passed. It is, however, not necessary that the order be published in
extenso.
W.AW.A.Smith,.Smith,
(Service Rules).
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 25th March 1969.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Penalty of reduction - Specifying the period.
In Official Memorandum No. GAD (S-1) 44 SSR 59 dated 20th July 1959,
instructions were issued to the effect that whenever penalty of reduction in rank is
imposed on Government Servants under the Classification, Control and Appeal Rules, the
period of reduction to the lower service should be for a specific period to be mentioned in
the order imposing the penalty and that delinquent Government servant should be
considered for promotion when the next vacancy occurs after the expiry of period. It has
also been laid down that restoration to the original grade is not automatic.
In view of the specific provision in the Mysore Civil Services Rules (Please vide
note below Rules 59 (2) to the contrary, it is necessary to modify the instructions issued in
the aforesaid Official Momorandum. It is accordingly directed that the last sentence
occuring in the Official Memorandum viz. "After the period expires, he is not
automatically restored to the higher grade but will be eligible to be considered for
promotion when the next vacancy occurs" should be deleted.
W.A.Smith,
(Service Rules).
No.GAD 57 PVC 68 Mysore Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 7th June 1969.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Disposal of cases received from the Bureau of Investigation of the Vigilance
Commission - Stipulation of the time limit-
Under the provisions of the Mysore State Vigilance Commission Rules, 1965, the
Vigilance Commision may investigate or enquire into the allegations made against
Government servants either suo motu or on a reference from Government or from any
other authority. If after the investigation is completed by the Bureau of Investigation in
any case, the Commission is of opinion that disciplinary proceedings should be taken in
such a case, it will forward the record of investigation along with its recommendations to
Government. After examining such records Government will have to take a decision
whether an enquiry is to be held or not.
2. It has been brought to the notice of Government that there is a large number of such
cases where no decisions have been taken on the investigation reports or preliminary
reports of the Bureau of Investigation of the Vigilance Commission. Before a
Departmental Enquiry is ordered against a Government servant it is necessaty to scrutinise
the evidence collected in course of preliminary enquiry and the authority competent to
order the enquiry is to satisfy itself that there is prima facie case for starting disciplinary
proceedings against the Government servant concerned. It should not be difficult for the
disciplinary authority to go through the record of investigation of the Vigilance
Commission in any particular case within a period of 2 to 3 weeks from the date of receipt
of the papers from the Vigilance Commission and take a decision whether regular inquiry
proceedings by appointing an Inquiry Officer should be ordered or the appropriate
disciplinary authority asked to take action in accordance with the provisions of Rule 12 of
CCA Rules. Once a decision to institute inquiry proceedings is taken, special care should
be taken to ensure that the entire proceedings are completed within a maximum period of 5
months (This will include the time taken to appoint an Inquiry Officer).
3. The above time limit should be strictly adhered to. Where for certain reason it is
exceeded, it will be the duty of the departmental Secretary to make a detailed report to
GAD giving particulars of the case received from the Vigilance Commmission after
necessary investigation by the Commmission, the decision taken by the Department for
institution of Inquiry proceedings and the progress of such inquiry.
4. All pending cases should be reviewed in the light of these instructions and a special
report may be submitted to the Chief Secretary by 20.6.1969 without fail.
R.N.Vasudeva,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 25th August 1969.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Bar for promotions during the period of penalty.
A case has come to the notice of Government in which the penalty of withholding
increments for a period of 2 years was imposed on an officer and the officer became due
for promotion to the higher post during the period. The question whether the officer
should or should not be promoted during the period for which his increments were
withheld had thereforce to be decided having regard to the nature of misconduct for which
the penalty was imposed.
2. Under the Classification, Control and Appeal Rules, withholding of increments and
withholding of promotions are distinct penalties and it is necessary for the Disciplinary
Authority at the time of imposing the penalty to make its intention clear in the order. A
similar question may arise in a case where an officer is reduced to a lower stage of pay in
the same time scale of pay for a specified period. In all such cases where penalties of
withholding of increments or reduction to a lower stage of pay in a time scale of pay are
imposed, the Disciplinary Authorities imposing such penalties should invariable consider
the nature of misconduct for which the penalty is being imposed and clarify in the order
itself whether during the period for which the increment is withheld or the officer is
reduced to a lower stage of pay, is to be considered as an eligible for promotion. If having
regard to the nature of the misconduct, the Disciplinary Authority considers that the
officer should not be eligible for promotion, the penalty of withholding of promotion for
such period should also be imposed in the order itself.
Syed Basheer Ahmed,

Dy. Secretary to Government,
(Services).
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 23rd June 1972.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Departmental Enquiries - failure to follow the prescribed procedure.
Ref:-1. O.M. No. GAD (OM) 3 CAR 57, dated 14.12.1957.
2. Circular No. GAD 35 SSR 58 dated 8.1.1959.
3. O.M. No. GAD (S-1) 33 SSR 61, dated 27.6.1962.
Inspite of the detailed procedural instructions for holding departmental enquiries
under the Mysore Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 and the
further instructions issued in the Circular and Official Memorandum mentioned above,
Government have observed in several cases that the Disciplinary Authorities are not
strictly following the provisions of the C.C.A.rules before imposing any of the major
penalties. The common defects, noticed in a majority of such cases have already been
indicated in the Circular dated 8.1.1959 and if the Deisciplinary Authorities are found to
commit the same irregularities it has to be presumed that they have not thoroughly
acquainted themselves with the provisions of the classification, control and appeal rules
and the instructions issued from time to time.
2. Whenever any such defects are noticed and the enquiries are found to be irregular,
Article 311 of the Constitution is blamed for coming in the way of enforcing discipine
amongst Government servants. Article 311 merely provides that before dismissal,
remvoal or reduction in rank of a Government servant an inquiry should be held in which
the Government servant should be informed of the charges against him and given a
reasonable opportunity of being heard in respect of those charges and if after such inquiry
it is decided to impose any such penalty he should also be given a reasonable opportunity
of making a represntation on the penalty proposed, but only on the basis of the evidence
adduced during such inquiry. The provisions of the 12 sub-rules in rule 11 of the C.C.A.
Rules are intended to ensure compiance with the provisions of Article 311 mentioned
above and these provisions of the C.C.A. Rules are quite clear and unambiguous. If the
Disciplinary Authorities were to read those provisions of the rules and follow them there
should be no occasion for any procedural lapses in holding departmental enquiries and
consequent setting aside of the orders.
3. All the Disciplinary Authorities under the C.C.A. Rules are therefore, once again
directed to study the provisions of the C.C.A. rules and various instructions issued very
carefully before holding any enquiry. In all cases where Government find that the
departmental enquiry was defective due to the Disciplinary Authority not properly
following the procedure mentioned above and as a consequence the final orders had to be
set aside, Government will be constrained to take action under the C.C.A. rules against the
Disciplinary Authority itself for negligence of duties and will not hesitate to recover from
such authority the whole or part of any pecuniary loss caused to Government by such
negligence.
4. Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are requested to bring these
orders to the notice of all Officers under their control.
R.J.Rebello,
Chief Secretary to Governemnt.
Mysore Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
No.GAD 29 SSR 72 Bangalore, Dated 4th August 1972.
CIRCULAR
Sub:- State Vigilance Commission - Nature of cases in which investigations and
inqiries are to be entrusted to it.
The powers of the State Vigilance Commmission are co-extensive with executive
powers of the State in regard to the conduct of Government servants but the cases in which
inqiries can be entrusted to the Commission are only those that are enumerated in clause
(a) of sub-rule (1) of rule 14A of the C.C.A. Rules and where imposition of a minor
penalty is considered not adequate.
2. Though the Vigilance Commission is empowered to investigate into any instance of
suspected misconduct on the part of any Government servant either suo motu or an
allegation and Government or any other authority can request the Commission to
investigate into an alleged impropriety of any Government Servant's conduct, the Heads of
Departments are primarily responsible for maintenace of integrity of Government
employees of their departments. It is neither practicable nor desirable to entrust to the
Commission investigation and/or inquiry in each and every case of alleged misconduct on
the part of a Government servant. In order to secure best advantage of a specialised
agency like the Vigilance Commission, with limited staff at its disposal, it is necessary
that only cases in which the head of the Department has prima facie reason to believe that
the Government servants concerned might be held guilty of corruption misconduct, lack of
integrity, malpractice or misdemanour and final conclusions cannot be reached, on the
basis of evidence of its departmental officers in one place and/or records in the possession
of the department itself, the Vigilance Commission could be requested to investigate into
the affairs. While doing so, it is necessary for an authority, after considering the material
before it, to intimate to the Vigilance Commission the alleged incidents, together with the
nature of misconduct on the part of Government Servants involved in such incidents.
3. All Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are, therefore, requested to
avoid reference to the Vigilance Commission in respect of vague allegations, which do not
prima facie lead to a reasonable presumption, that the Government Servants concerned
have Committed misconduct. Only cases, in which a preliminary inquiry cannot be
conducted by the Departmental officers themselves due to complication nature of the case
or on account of other reasons like the evidence being not available form departmental
records etc., at one place and from one department, should be referred to the Vigilance
Commission for investigation. Cases in which collection of material and evidence is
simple and is not, for any reasons, beyond the control of the departmental officers, should
be dealt with departmentally.
sd/-
Mysore Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
No.GAD 1 SSR 73 Bangalore, Dated 9th February 1973.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Government servants involved in the Departmental enquiries - taking
assistance of other Government Servant.
According to sub-rule (5) of rule 11 of the Mysore Civil Services (C.C.A.) Rules
1957, as it stood prior to August 1965, a Government servant against whom departmental
proceedings were being held could take the assistance of another Government to servant
only with the approval of the disciplinary authority. Based on this provision, instructions
were issued in O.M. No. GAD 21 OSR 60 dated 28.7.1960 that in such cases a
Government servant could take the assistance of another Government servant only with
the approval of the Disciplinary Authority.
The afore said sub-rule was amended by Government Notfication No. GAD 15 SSR
65, dated 26.8.65 and the provision requiring approval of the Disciplinary Authority in
such cases was deleted. Consequently, it is not necessary for Government servant who
desires to take the assistance of other Government servant in such cases to obtain the
approval of the Disciplinary Authority. The written consent of the Government servant
whose assistance is sought to be taken should however, be produced before the
Disciplinary Authority who should formally inform the Head of the Department, in which
the assisting Government Servant is working, of the fact.
The Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are requested to bring the
position explained above to the notice of all the officers under their control.
H.P.Dharanendranath,
General Administration Department
(Service Rules).
No.GAD 18 SSR 73 Karnataka Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 2nd November 1973.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Withholding of increment(s) with cumulative effect - procedure to be followed
The penalty of withholding increment(s) mentioned in clause (iv) of rule 8 of the
Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957, is required to
be imposed after following the procedure laid down under rule 12. The Mysore (now
Karnataka) High Court in Writ Petition No. 241 of 1969 (C.Veerachowdaiah Vs. State of
Mysore and No. 1966 of 1968 (G.A.Appaiah Vs. State of Mysore) has held that the
penalty of with-holding increments with cumulative effect or affect in the future
increments amounts to reduction to a lower stage and is, therefore a major penalty. In
view of this decision of the High Court and pending decision on the appeal to the Supreme
Court, all the Appointing Authorities and other Disciplinary Authorities competent to
impose the above penalty under the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules, should follow the procedure prescribed under rule 11 while imposing this
penalty.
2. The Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are requested to bring
these instructions to the notice of all the appointing authorities/disciplinary authorities
working under their control.
N.P.Joshi,
(Service Rules).
PROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

Sub:- Departmental Enquiry proceedings - sanctions remuneration to the presenting
officers appointed in the -
ORDER NO. GAD 4 SSR 74, BANGALORE, DATED 3RD APRIL 1974
In a departmental proceeding instituted against a Government servant, the
Disciplinary Authority can appoint, under rule 11(5) (c) of the Karnataka Civil Services
(Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules 1957, any other Government servant or a legal
practitioner to be named as 'Presenting Officer' to present the case on behalf of the
Disciplinary Authority in support of the articles of the charges framed against the
Government servant involved in the inquiry. Where a Government servant is nominated
accordingly as presenting officer in an inquiry case, he has to attend to the work of
presenting the case in addition to his normal duties in the department. There is no
provision at present for payment of any remuneration to the presenting officers for the
extra work they have to discharge in such cases.
2. The question of sanctioning suitable remuneration to the presenting officer has
therefore been examined and after careful consideration of the matter, Government are
pleased to order that remuneration at the rate of 10% of the minimum of the scale of pay
of the Government servant nominated as presenting officer be sanctioned to him per day
of hearing subject to a minimum of Rs. 10/- and maximum of Rs. 25/- per day.
3. These orders will not be appicable to the officers and staff of the Vigilance
Commission.
4. The Heads of Departments and Secretaries to Government are requested to bring
these orders to the notice of the several disciplinary authorities/appointing authorities
under their control.
5. This order is issued with the concurrence of the Finance Department vide their U.O.
Note No. FD 315/S-1/74, dated 22.3.1974.
By order and in the name of the
Governor of Karnataka,
sd/-
Syed Karimulla Khadri,
(Service Rules).
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 2nd May 1974.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Withholding of increment(s) with cumulative effect - procedure to be followed
Ref:- i) Offical Memorandum No. GAD 18 SSR 73, dated 2.11.1973
ii) Government Notification No. GAD 28 SSR 69 dated 12.12.1973.
Instructions were issued in Official Memorandum No. GAD 18 SSR 73, dated
2.11.1973 read at (i) above to all the Appointing Authorities and other Disciplinary
Authorities to follow the procedure under rule 11 of the Classification Control and Appeal
Rules while imposing the penalty of with holding increment(s) with cumulative effect on
Government servants as in certain Writ Petitions it was held by the High Court that
withholding of increment(s) had the effect of reducing a Government servant to a lower
stage in a time scale of pay and it was then a major penalty.
Rule 8 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules
has now been amended in Government Notification No. GAD 28 SSR 69, dated
12.12.1973 and the penalty of reduction to a lower stage in the time scale constitues a
minor penalty. Therefore, while imposing the above penalty or the penalty of withholding
of increments with cumulative effect, the procedure under rule 12 only has to be followed
and it is not necessary to follow the procedure under rule 11 of the C.C.A. Rules. The
Official Memorandum No. GAD 18 SSR 73, dated 2.11.1973 may therefore be treated as
with drawn with effect from 24.1.1974 on which date the amendments were published in
the Gazette.
sd/-
Syed Karimullah Khadri,
(Service Rules).
No.GAD 47 PVC 74 Karnataka Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 1st July 1974.
CIRCULAR
Sub:- Requisitions for Records, reports etc., required for purpose of investigations
and inquiries by the Officers of the Vigilance Commission.
In Circular No. GAD 18 FAD 57, dated 26th March 1957, all Heads of Departments,
Divisional Commissioners and Deputy Commissioners were instructed to comply
promptly all requistions from the Director of Anti-Corruption for any record report or
information required for purposes of investigation.
On further consideration of the matter, it was clarified to all Heads of Departments
under Circular No. GAD 46 OAC 64, dated 16th June 1964 that all requisitions for record,
reports etc., received from the Director of Anti-Corruption or any Gazetted Officers under
him may be accepted and honoured by all presiding officers in charge of the Government
officers and institutions.
In connection with the investigation taken up by the Vigilance Commission into the
work of excavating Narayanapur left Bank Canal of Upper Krishna project, certain records
were required by the Technical Audit Cell. For want of connected records, it is reported
that the investigation is held up causing delay in the investigation. The Chief Engineer,
Technical Audit Cell has requested that Circular instructions may be issued to all
Government Departments.
Reiterating the instructions issued earlier, it is once again directed that any
requisitions from a Gazetted Officer of the Vigilance Commission for records from any
official of the Government Department should be complied with promptly under
acknowledgement.
G.V.K.Rao,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 15th July 1974.
CIRCULAR
Sub:- Submission of reports of - the Vigilance Commission - pendency in the
Secretariat.
It has come to the notice of Government that many cases where reports have been
received from the Vigilance Commission are pending in the several Departments of the
Secretariat for a long time. The Chief Minister has observed that all these cases should be
disposed of promptly.
Although the Vigilance Commision has completed the inquiries and sent its
recommendation to Government, it is observed that there has been delay in taking action
on these recommendations and in passing final orders. Such instances have also come to
the notice of the Public Accounts Committee.
It is, therefore, required of the Administrative Departments review periodically the
stage of pendnecy of these reports so as to ensure that orders of Government are passed
thereon without delay. For this purpose Secretaries to Government are requested to furnish
reports to General Administration Department (Political) every month indicating the latest
position regarding the pendency of these reports and the action taken in the proforma
appended to this Circular.
sd/-
M.Shankaranarayanan,
Joint Secretary to Government,
Department.
STATEMENT SHOWING THE ENQUIRY CASES OF THE VIGILANCE
COMMISSION PENDING FOR FINAL ORDERS OF GOVERNMENT.
Sl. File Name of AGOs Date of Vigilance Stage of Remarks
No. etc receipt of Commissions pendency
No.
Vigilance recommendation.
Commr's
Report.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 16th Sept. 1974.
CIRCULAR
Sub:- Issue of instructions to Heads of Department etc., regarding assistance of
officials of other Departments to the Vigilance Commission.
During the course of investigations into cases either by the Technical Audit Cell or
by the Bureau of Investigations of the Vigilance Commmission, it might become
necessary to have the assistance of officials of other Departments for witnessing any
investigation, for giving any information they might have pertaining to the case being
investigated or for furnishing any opinion on an issue referred to them during the
investigation, either by correspondence or at the spot. If such requests made by the
officers of the Commission are not complied with immediately the investigation will not
only be delayed but also rendered incomplete.
The following instructions are, therefore, issued for the guidance of all conerened for
facilitating investigations by the Technical Audit Cell or Bureau of Investigations of the
State Vigilance Commmission. All Heads of Departments and Secretaries to Government
are requested to ensure that whenever any officer of the Vigilance Commission requests
for any assistance, they should render this immediately without having to obtain orders of
higher authorities and keep such information given discussions etc, as confidentail. Heads
of Departments and Secretaries to Government are also requested to issue necessary
instructions to their subordinate officers to extend full co-operation to the Technical Audit
Cell or other investigating staff of the Vigilance Commission whenever such assistance of
co-operation is sought. Any instance of non-cooperation of any official will be viewed
seriously by Government.
sd/-
N.A.Muthanna,
Department,
(Political).
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 3rd December 1974.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
In cases which are investigated by the State Vigilance Commission under rule 14A
of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 Government,
after examining the investigation report and the records, can entrust the detailed inquires
to the Vigilance Commission or it can direct the appropriate Disciplinary Authorities to
take action in accordance with rule 12 aganist the Government servant involved in those
cases. It has been brought to the notice of Government by the State Vigilance
Commission that there has been delay on the part of various disciplinary authorities in
initiating action against Government servants under rule 12 and in finalising the cases.
It is observed that such delays have occurred especially in cases where the number of
Government servants involved is more than one and where different Disciplinary
Authorities are required to take action against them under rule 12 of the classification
Control and Appeal Rules.
The question has been examined. If, in a case investigated by the Vigilance
Commission under Rule 14A of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules 1957 more than one Government servants are involved all the Government
servants may be proceeded against in a common proceeding and for this purpose, a joint
inquiry will have to be ordered by Government in accordance with rule 13 of
Classification, Control and Appeal Rules. While ordering a joint inquiry, the Disciplinary
Authority in relation to the Government servant highest in rank may be nominated as the
Disciplinary Authority and it may be specified in the order that such disciplinary authority
will be competent to impose any of the minor penalties on all the Government servants
after following the procedure under rule 12 of Classification, Control and Appeal Rules.
All the Secretaries to Government are requested to take action accordingly in such
cases.
sd/-
N.P.Joshi,
Department,
(Service Rules).
Procedure for drawing remuneration by the Presenting Officer appointed in the

Departmental Inquiry proceedings.
Read:- 1. G.O. GAD 4 SSR 74, dated 3rd April 1974.
2. Letter No. GM. Genl. 75, dated 16th December 1974 from the Accountant
General in Karnataka, Bangalore.
ORDER NO. GAD 6 SSR 75, dated 31st MARCH, 1975
Government are pleased to order that the Disciplinary Authority which appoints a
Presenting Officer in an inquiry or the Inquiry Authority appointed by the Disciplinary
Authority whichever authority actually conducts the inquiry, should issue a certificate to
the presenting officer in the appended form in respect of attendance/participation in the
inquiry by the Presenting Officer.
The amount of remuneration shall after conclusion of inquiry, be drawn by the
Drawing Officer in relation to the presenting officer or by the P.O. himself if he happens
to be a Drawing Officer on the strength of the certificate issued by the Disciplinary
Authority or Inquiring Authority, as the case may be and no sanction of any authority will
be necessary.
Instructions regarding Disciplinary Proceedings against Government servant under

Rule 12 of the K.S.C.S (CCA) Rules, 1957.
CIRUCLAR No. GAD 14 SSR 75, DATED THE 21ST MAY, 1975.
It has come to the notice of the Government that in some cases where Government
have directed the Disciplinary Authority to take action under rule 12 of the Classification
Control and Appeal Rules that authority, has in turn, appointed one of its subordinate
officers as specially empowered authority to proceed with the disciplinary action against
the Government servants concerned.
If the gravity of the charge is such as not to warrant imposition of any of the major
penalties and imposition of a minor penalty would meet the ends of justice on being
convinced of the proof of the charge in question, action has to be taken under rule 12 of
those rules. In such cases, it would ordinarily be enough if (a) the Government servant is
informed in writing of the proposal to take action against him and the allegations on which
this action is based and given an opportunity to make any representation he may wish to
make, and (b) representation, if any, made by him is taken into consideration by the
Disciplinary Authority for recording a finding on each of the imputations of misconduct
before any penalty is imposed on him. All this could be done by the Disciplinary
authority itself and normally there would be no need for delegating these powers to any
other authority to take disciplinary action against the Government Servant.
There may, however, be cases, as indicated in rule 12(a) (b) where in though the
charges are not grave enough to warrant imposition of major penalties, they are
nevertheless of a complicated nature and proof of charges against the Government servant
cannot be concluded, unless a detailed inquiry is held and the Government servant is given
adequate opportunity to prove his innocence. In such cases, the disciplinary authority has
to follow the procedure laid down in rule 11.
G.V.K.Rao, Karnataka Government Secretariat,
Chief Secretary Vidhana Soudha,
D.O. No. GAD 23 IPN 75 Bangalore, Dated June 17, 1975.
My Dear
Sub:- Cases of Vigilance Commission pending with Government - Review of.
In the meeting of Secretaries on 21.4.1975 the pendancy of Vigilance Commission
reports in the Secretariat was reviewed. It was decided that Secretaries would review this
pendancy from time to time so that these cases are disposed of promptly.
I had a few cases (pending for over one year in some of the Secretariat Departments)
reviewed to ascertain the reasons for delay in passing final orders. The results of the
review reveal that the manner of examiniation of the reports of the Vigilance Commission
in the Secretariat Department leaves much to be desired.
Firstly, it appears that those who deal with these cases lack basic knowledge of the
provisions of the C.C.A., Rules and the Correct procedure to be followed. This has
resulted in abnormal delays in finalising the cases. In one case, for instance, a direction
was given to consult the Public Service Commission even before Government took a
decision on the findings of the Vigilance Commission and a Show cause notice was issued
to the AGO and the matter was delayed till the P.S.C. pointed out the non-observance of
the presceibed procedure. In another case, a decision was taken to send the report of the
Vigilance Commission to the head of the Department for taking necessary action since the
AGO was a non-gazetted Government servant, although, under the rules, Government was
the disciplinary authority. This incorrect decision lead to avoidable delay in processing
the case.
Secondly, there is a tendancy to view these reports of the Vigilance Commission on
as reports from field departments and to examine and scrutinise them accordingly. Such
an examination is unnecessary and orders almost on the rediculous, because these are
chiefly inquiry reports which are sent to Government as the disciplinary authority for
deciding on the recommendations made.
In my view it would be appropriate to examine or scrutinise these reports at any level
lower than that of a Deputy Secretary. Even at these levels, what is required is to record
Government's findings, as the disciplinary authority on each of the charges and then to
communicate them to the AGOs through the show cause notice, intimating them the
penalty proposed. Since these inquiries have been conducted very comprehensively and
the findings are normally well supported. It may not be open to Government to differ with
them except in rare cases where gross mis-carriage of justice, perversity, improper or
unsound, reasoning etc. is manifest. It would, therefore be advisiable to accept the
recommendations of the Vigilance Commission in most cases and record findings to that
effect. I may also mention that whenever a view is taken which is inconsistant with the
recommendations of the State Vigilance Commission in regard to disciplinary action
against a Government servant, the matter has to go to the Cabinet for orders and this has
also to be commented upon in the annual report of the Vigilance Commission which is
submitted to the Legislature.
What is crucial in the processing or Vigilance cases is the manner in which these
reports should be handled at Government level. A note indicating the procedure to be
followed in handling these cases is appended.
I shall be glad if you could impress upon all concerned officers and staff in your
department the need to followe the correct procedure in examining these reports and in
passing orders thereon.
Please acknowledge this letter.
Yours Sincerely.
sd/-
G.V.K.Rao,
Chief Secretary to
Government.
No.FD 213 SRS 71 Karnataka Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 20th October 1975.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Rule 59 of the Karnataka Civil Services Rules - Clarification regarding.
In Government Order No. FD 92 SRS 60, dated 1.12.1960 orders have been issued
directing the competent authority imposing on a Government servant the penlaty of
reduction to a lower stage in a time-scale, to indicate in every order imposing such a
penalty.
i) the date from which the order should take effect and the period (in terms of
years and months), for which the penalty shall be operative;
ii) the stage in the time-scale (in terms of rupees) to which the Government
servant is reduced; and
iii) the extent (in terms of years and months), if any to which the period referred
to at (i) above should operate to postpone future increments. It is also
clarified therein that reduction to a lower stage in a time-scale is not
permissible under the rules for an unspecified period or on permanent basis
and when a Government servant is reduced to a particular stage his pay will
remain constant at that stage for the entire period of reduction.
In many cases it is seen that the orders passed by the competent authorities reducing
the Government servant to a lower stage in a time-scale do not actually specify the exact
stage in terms of rupees on account of which doubts have been expressed as to whether
increments that fall due during the period of reduction to the lower stage in a time-scale
are to be sanctioned as and when they fall due during that period. It is also argued that in
the absence of specific mention in the order of penalty, of with-holding increments during
the period of penalty the increments that fall due during that period cannot be with-held as
the penalties of reduction to a lower stage in a time-scale and withholding of increment are
two different punishments.
On consultation, the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, intimated that during
the entire period of penalty the Government servant has to draw the pay at the stage to
which he has been reduced without earning any increments. In view of this and of the
clarification issued in second para of clause (a) in O.M. No. FD 92 SRS 60, dated
1.12.1960 cited above, that when a Government servant is reduced to a particular stage his
pay will remain constant at that stage for the entire period of reduction, it is further
clarified that no increments should be granted during the enitre period of penalty of
reduction to a lower stage in a time-scale and he should draw pay at the stage of which he
has so been reduced during that entire period of penalty.
With a view to achieve this object it is further directed that the competent authority
should ensure that every order imposing on a Government servant the penalty of reduction
to a lower stage in a time-scale invariably specifies that stage in terms of rupees to which
the Government servant is reduced, as in the following form.
"The .................... has decided that Shri ................... should be reduced to the
pay of Rs ............... for a period of ........................ with effect from
....................."
sd/-
M.A.Srinivasan,
Finance Department (Services-I).
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION SECRETARIAT

Notification No. GAD 24 SSR 75
Bangalore, Dated the 11th December 1975
G.S.R. 371.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 10 of the
Karnataka Civil Service (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957, the Government
of Karnataka hereby empowers the Deputy Commissioner of a district, for the purpose of
the said sub-rule, in respect of Government Servants belonging to Class III and Class IV
Service of all State Civil Services except the Karnataka Judicial Service, working in the
district under the immediate administrative control of any officer who does not have
Jurisdiction beyond the limits of the district.
By Order and in the name of the
Governor of Karnataka,
M. Sankaranarayanan,
Additional Secretary to
Government,
Department.
CONFIDENTIAL Karnataka Government Secretariat,
No.GAD 2 SSR 76 Vidhana Soudha,
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Appeal Petitions / Review Petitions to the Governor - Disposal of - Procedure
to be followed in respect of.
Under rules 18, 19 and 26 of the Karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1957
appeals/review petitions in the types of cases specified therein can be preferred to the
Governor who has to pass orders on them on the advice of the Council of Ministers. What
constitutes advice of the Council of Ministers in such cases has been made clear in the
U.O. (Confidential) Note No. GAD 14 SSR 71, dated 16.4.1971, the relevant extract of
which is as follows:-
"powers exercisable by the Governor under the C.C.A. Rules are required to
be exercised by the Governor himself. But in the exercise of such powers
the Governor has to act on the advice of the Council of Ministers. The
Government Rules of Business made under article 166(3) of the Constitution
regulates when an advice may be regarded as the advice of the Council of
Ministers. It is not necessary in every case that the whole Council of
Ministers should consider the matter to advice the Governor. When
according to the Rules of Business a particular item of business is allocated
to an individual Minister, the action by him in regard to it is action of the
Council of Minsters and advice, if any, tendered by such individual Minister
is advice of the Council of Ministers. This is the Constitutional position-vide
A.I.R. 1963 S.C.395-Bachinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab."
2. It is observed in some cases that the Secretariat Departments are not following the
above mentioned correct procedure in the matter of obtaining and submitting the advice of
the Council of Ministers to the Governor. Such cases should therefore, be submitted to the
Governor with a summary note, only after obtaining the orders of the concerned Minister.
If, however according to the Second or Third Schedule to the Karnataka Government
Rules of Business a case is required to be placed before the Cabinet or the Chief Minister,
the case shall be submitted to the Governor only after obtaining the orders of the Cabinet
or the Chief Minister, as the case may be.
3. The Secretaries to Government are requested to ensure that this procedure is
scruplusously followed in all such cases.
sd/-
M.Sankaranarayan,
Add. Secretary to Government,
Generay Administration Department
No.DPAR 70 SSR 76. Karnataka Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 29th January 1977.
CIRCULAR
Sub:- Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1957 -
Amendments of rule 11-A, 25 and 26 of the - clarifies the position under the -
In keeping with the provisions of 311 of the Consitution of India before its
amendment by the Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, rules 11-A, 25 and 26 of the
Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1957 required that
before any of the penalties specified in clauses (v) to (viii) of rule 8 of the said rules were
imposed on a Government servant, he shall be given an opportunity of making such
representation as he may wish to make on the proposed penalty. This was generally called
"the second show cause notice."
Consequent on the amendment of article 311 of the Constitution, rules 11-A, 25 and
26 have been amended in the Government Notification No. DPAR 70 SSR 76, dated 15th
January 1977 (published in the Karnataka Gazette dated, 20th January 1977) and the
requirements to issue the "second show cause notice" have been omitted. It is now not
necessary to issue "the second show cause notice" in such cases.
Where such 'second show cause notice' has already been issued to a Government
servant before the date of coming into force of the aforesaid amendments, a reply thereto
may be awaited and the representation, if any, submitted by such Government servant
taken into consideration before any final orders passed.
The Secretaries to Government and Heads of Department are requested to bring the
above position to the notice of all the Disciplinary Authorities / Appointing Authorities
sd/-
Dept. of Cabinet Affairs & DPAR.,
(Service Rules)
No. DPAR 18 SSR 77, dated 23rd May 1977

Sub:- Disciplinary proceedings against Government servants.
According to the Rules of Business, certain cases concerned disciplinary proceedings
against Government servants are required to be submitted to the Cabinet. In order to
enable the Cabinet to take an appropriate decision in such cases, the following service
particulars of the Government servants involved should be furnished in the Cabinet note or
in a statement appended to it.
1. Name of the Government servant.
2. Date of birth
3. Date of superannuation
4. Date of entry into service
5. Length of service
6. The post held at present or at the time of his suspension, pay scale and pay
7. If he is a promotee to the present post, the date of his promotion, its pay
scale and his pay on the date of promotion
8. If he is/was under suspension, the date of suspension and reinstatement if
any.
The Secertaries to Government are requested to ensure that these instructions are
followed in all such cases.
No.DPAR 11 SSR 77. Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated the 5th July 1977.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Suspension of Government servants involved in misappropriation cases etc.-
Revocation of Instruction regarding the..
It has come to the notice of the Government that a number of Government servants
who are alleged to be involved in cases of misapropriation embezzlement of Government
money or corruption have been placed / continued under suspension for a number of years
for the reason that disciplinary proceedings or criminal charges / proceedings are pending
against them. The question whether suspension of such Government servants can be
revoked and they could be reinstated in service at any time before termination of the
disciplinary or criminal proceedings pending against them, has been examined.
2. The circumstances in which Government servants may be placed under suspension
have been indicated in Confidential O.M. No. GAD 21 SSR 65 dated 26th February 1965
as guidelines. The circumstances in which Government servants are mandatorily required
to be placed under suspension are indicated in rule 10(2) of the C.C.A. Rules and rules 101
and 102 of the Karnataka Civil Services Rules. Under sub-rule (5) of rule 10 of the C.C.A.
Rules, an order of suspension made or deemed to have been made under this rule is
absolute.
3. In cases where criminal proceedings against Government servants for
misappropriation, corruption or embezzlement of Government money are pending in
courts or disciplinary proceedings in respect of these matters are pending for a number of
years and are likely to drag on, there is no objection to consider the circumstances of each
case and decide whether the order of suspension may be revoked and the Government
servant given a posting to a place where it will not involve handling of any Government
money or where there is no scope for corruption. While taking a decision, it should also be
examined whether there is any likelihood of the Government Servant tampering with any
evidence or influencing any witnesses if he is reinstated. The seriousness of the charge
against the Government servant in the criminal or disciplinary case should also be taken
into account.
4. All appointing authorities and officers authorised to place Government servants
under suspension may review the cases of suspension of Government servants
accordingly. These instructions however, do not apply to cases where Government
servants have been placed under suspension on charges other than misappropriation,
embezzlement of Government money or corruption.
sd/-
N.P.Joshi,
Deputy Secretary to
Government,
DPAR (Service Rules).
Vidhana Soudha,
CIRCULAR
The Proviso to rule 8 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules, 1957, reads as follows:-
"Provided that in the absence of special and adequate reasons to the contrary
to be mentioned in the order of the disciplinary authority no penalty other
than those specified in clauses (vi) to (viii) shall be imposed for an
establishment charges of corruption".
For the purpose of the proviso the expression "corruption" is defined in Explanation-
1.
Clarifications have been sought whether "Mis-appropriation" by a Government
servant amounts to corruption. It is hereby clarified that such misappropriation amounts to
a criminal mis-conduct within the meaning of clauses (c) and (d) of the sub-section (1) of
section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (Central Act 2 of 1947) and is
therefore, covered by the definition of corruption in explanation 1 below rule 8 of the
Classification, Control and Appeal Rules, An extract of sub-section (1) of section 5 of the
Act is enclosed for reference.
The Secretaries to Government, Heads of Departments and other Appointing and
Disciplinary Authorities are requested to take note of the above position while dealing
with such cases.
sd/-
N.P.Joshi,
Dept. of Cabinet Affairs & Dept. of
Personnel & Administrative
Reforms,
(Service Rules).
Extract of sub-section (1) of Section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act

(Act No. II of 1947).
5. Criminal Misconduct in discharge of official duty:-
1. A public servant is said to commit the offence or criminal misconduct in the
discharge of his duty.
(a) if he habitually accepts or obtains or agrees to accept or attempts to obtain
from any person for himself or for any other person, any gratification (other
than legal remuneration) as a motive or reward such as is mentioned in
section 161 of the Indian Penal Code; or
(b) if he habitually accepts or obtains or agrees to accept or attempts to obtain
for himself or any other person, any valuable thing without consideration or
for a consideration which he knows to be inadequate, from any person whom
he knows to have been, or to be, or to be likely to be concerned in any
proceeding or business transacted or about to be transacted by him, or having
any connection with the official functions of himself or of any public servant
to whom he is subordinate, or from any person whom he knows to be
interested in or related to the person so concerned; or
(c) if he dishonestly or fradulently misappropriate or otherwise converts for his
own use any property entrusted to him or under his control as a public
servant or allows any other person so to do; or
(d) if he, by corrupt or illegal means or by otherwise abusing his position as
public servant, obtains for himself or for any other person any valuable thing
or pencuniary advantage,
(e) if he or any person on his behalf is in possession or has, at any time during
the period of his office, been in possession, for which the public servant
cannot satisfiactorily account, of pecuniary resources or property
disproportionate to his known sources of income.
(3) Vigilance Commission - Reference of - Complaints, Allegations against the Gazetted
Officer to the by Heads of Departments - Clarification regarding.
Cir. No. DCA 16 ARB 77, dated 24th November 1977.
Clarification has been sought on whether Heads of Departments can refer complaints
or Allegations aganist Gazetted officers to the Vigilance Commission for investigation.
The Question has been examined. Normally, complaints or allegations to be referred
to the Vigilance Commission should be such as would necessitate imposition of a major
punishment if, on investigation they are proved to be true. As Government are the
appointing authority in respect of all Gazetted Officers, such punishments can be imposed
on them only by Government. It has accordingly been decided that Heads of Departments
should send necessary proposals to Government in the Administrative Department
concerned whenever they consider that any compliant or allegation against a Gazetted
Officer should be investigated into by the Vigilance Commission.
No. DPAR 24 SSR 78, dated 14th July 1978

Sub:- Imposition of penalty of withholding of increments and reduction to lower
stages in time scale of pay or to a lower post etc.- Instructions reg.
Withholding of increments is one of the penalties specified under clause (iii) of Rule
8 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules 1957. While
imposing this penalty on a Government servant the competent Disciplinary Authority has
to specify in its order the period for which the increment is withheld or postponed and
whether such postponement would have the effect of postponing further increments as
indicated in Rule 51 of Karnataka Civil Services Rules.
2. It is noticed that in some cases the disciplinary authorities have imposed this penalty
without any such directions as referred to above and without even verifying what their pay
and pay scales were at the time of imposing the penalty and whether any increments were
due to accrue to them after the date of the order imposing the penalty. Other factors such
as whether the Government servants were in the rune for promotion before the next
increments became due or whether they were due to retire shortly were also not verified
before passing the orders.
3. Omission to verify these relevant factors has lead to passing of instructions orders in
some cases. Orders of the competent Disciplinary Authorities in such cases had to be
reviewed in appeal or review.
4. All this could have been avoided if the concerned authorities had taken into
consideration various factors referred to above before issuing orders imposing penalties. It
is therefore hereby impressed on all the Appointing Authorities / Disciplinary Authorities
that before passing orders imposing the penalty of withholding increments or the penalty
of reduction to a lower stage in the pay scale or the lower post / service, they should
invariably verify:-
(a) the pay of the delinquent Government servant,
(b) the pay scale of the post held by him
(c) whether the Government servant would earn any increments after imposition
of the penalty
(d) whether he is in the run for promotion, before any increment accrues to him
in existing scale after imposing of the said penalty, and
(e) whether he is due to retire before the proposed penalty is fully implemented.
and then pass appropriate orders having due regard to the provisions of clauses (iii), (iva)
and (v) of rule 8 of Classification, Control and Appeal Rules as the case may be, rule 59 of
Karnataka Civil services Rules and instructions issued by Finance Department in its O.M.
No. FD 92 SRS 60, dated 1st December 1960 and O.M. No. FD 213 SRS 71, dated 20th
October 1975 so that the order can be implemented fully and effectively.
5. Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are requested to bring these
instructions to the notice of all the Appointing Authorities and other Disciplinary
Authorities under their control for guidance.
No. DPAR 24 SSR 77, dated 16th August 1978

Sub:- Suspension of Government officials
Instance have come to the notice of Government of suspension of Government
officials being ordered for specific periods and recommendations for continuing the
suspension being received by Government after the expiry of the period of previous
suspension. In a recent case, the High Court has held that if orders continuing the
suspension are not issued on or before the expiry of the period of suspension, then such
orders are in effective as the suspension lapses on the expiry of the period of suspension.
For example, if an order was issued on 1st October 1976 suspending an official for a
period of 6 months and if orders continuing the suspension are not issued on or before 1st
April 1977, but are issued subsequently with a time gap, then the second order is
ineffective and not enforceable and the official is deemed to be on duty from 1st April
1977.
Sub-rule (1) of Rule 10 of Karnataka Civil Service (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules 1957 empowers an appointing authority or any authority to which it is
subordinate or any authority empowered by Government to place a Government servant
under suspension. Sub-rule (5)(a) says that such order of suspension shall continue to
remain in force until it is modified or revoked by the authority competent to do so. A
combined reading of Sub-rules (1) and sub-rule (5) (a) of rule 10 leaves no doubt about the
fact that an order of suspension passed under sub-rule (1) of rule 10 may be for an
indefinite period terminable only with the termination of the enquiry, unless the authority
which passes the order of suspension or the authority competent to do so modified revokes
the same acting under the clause (c) of sub-rule (5) of Rule 10.
It is therefore clear that order or suspension passed under sub-rule (1) of rule 10, not
specifying any period remains in force till it is modified or revoked. In cases where the
period of suspension is specified, then orders continuing the suspension must be issued on
or before the expiry of the period of suspension.
Sub-rule (6) of rule 10 is that if final orders in an enquiry are not passed within a
period of 6 months from the date of suspension in the case of Government servant
suspended by authority other than Government, the case has to be reported to Government
for such order as Government may deem fit. An order of suspension for an indefinite
period made under rule 10(a) automatically does not lapse after the period of 6 months.
All the officers are requested to follow these instructions strictly.
No.FD 17 SRS 78. Karnataka Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 28th Sept. 1978.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Instruction under rule 59 of the Karnataka Civil Services Rules - Further
clarifications regarding.
In O.M. No. FD 92 SRS 60 dated 1.12.1960, instructions were issued directing
interlia that in cases where a Government servant is reduced to a particular stage, his pay
will remain constant at that stage for the entire period of reduction. The tenability of these
directions in the context of the powers conferred on the competent authorities under the
Karnataka Civil Services (C.C.A) Rules has been examined by Government. Under the
provisions of the Karnataka Civil Services (C.C.A) Rules, a competent authority can
impose on a Government servant the penalty of reduction of pay to lower stage or that of
withholding increments in the time scale or both. It follows that such punishments have to
be imposed only as a result of a departmental enquiry held against a Government Servant.
The directions contained in the Official Memorandum dated 1.12.1960 referred to above
would mean that although the competent authority had imposed a penalty of only
reduction of pay to a lower stage in a time-scale, the Government servant concerned will
not draw annual increments during the period of reduction. Since this constitutes a
penalty, it has to be ordered only by the competent authority on the conclusion of a
departmental enquiry. It is, therefore, hereby directed that the following sentence in
clause (a) of the above mentioned instructions shall be deemed to have been withdrawn:-
"Also when a Government servant is reduced to a particular stage, his pay
will remain constant at that stage for the entire period of reduction".
It is also directed that the pay and allowances of a Government servant on whom the
above penalty has been imposed should be regulated having regard to the directions issued
by the competent authority under Rule 8 (iv-a) of the Karnataka Civil Services (C.C.A)
Rules, 1957.
sd/-
G.N.Honavar,
Finance Department (Expenditure-IV)
Note on the procedure to be followed at the Secretariat level in handling cases

coming under Rule 14-A of the K.C.S. (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules,
1957.
PART I. Action on the report of Investigation.
1. On receipt of the report of investigation with the opinion of the Vigilance
Commissioner or of any officer of the Vigilance Commission authorised by the Vigilance
Commissioner in writing under Rule 6(2) of the Karnataka State Vigilance Commission
Rules, 1965, a decision has to be taken by Government in the Administrative Secretariat
on the nature of disciplinary proceedings to be commended whether, having regard to the
facts and circumstances of the cases and recommendation, if any, of the Vigilance
Commissioner and the alleged mis-conduct, whether if proved, it would call for imposition
of a minor penalty or a major penalty.
(a)(i) If it is a decided that imposition of a minor penalty would be sufficient and the
number of Government servants involved is only one, the appropriate
Disciplinary Authority in relation to the Government servant involved in the
case may be directed to take action against him under rule 12 of the Rules.
(ii) If it is decided that imposition of a minor penalty is sufficient, but the number
of Government servants involved is more than one, Government in the
concerned Administrative Secretariat should order a joint enquiry in
accordance with rule 13. While ordering the joint enquiry the Disciplinary
Authority in relation to the Government Servant highest in rank should be
nominated as the Disciplinary Authority, specifying therein that such
Disciplinary Authority would be competent to impose any of the minor
penalties on all the Government servants involved in the case after following
the procedure under Rule 12 (vide O.M. No. GAD 63 SSR 74) dated
3.12.1974.
(b) If, on the other hand, a conclusion is reached that imposition of a major penalty
is warranted, the Vigilance Commission may be directed to hold a detailed
enquiry under rule 11 of the Rules.
Note:- If the decision proposed to be taken either under clauses (a) or (b) of this
para is inconsistant with the recommendation of the Vigilance
Commissioner orders of the Cabinet should be obtained.
PART II. Action on the report of Inquiry.

2. On receipt of the report of inquiry, from the Vigilance Commissioner, if a case
referred to in clause (b) of para 1 it has to be processed under rule 11-A. It should be
determined whether any further enquiry on any point or on any matter is necessary. If so,
the case may be remitted for further enquiry into that point or matter. Otherwise, the
following steps should be taken.
(a) Findings of the Government should be recorded on the articles of charge
inquired into by the Inquiring Authority. If Government disagree with any
of the findings of the Inquiry Authority, its findings should be recorded
accordingly with brief reasons for the disagreement.
(b) If Government, having regard to the findings of all or any of the articles of
charges, is of the opinion that any of the minor penalties specified in clause
(ii) to (iv) of rule 8 should be imposed on the Government servant, it should
straightaway issue an order imposing such penalty. Consulation with the
P.S. Commission before imposing a minor penalty by Government is not
necessary. Orders passed by the Government should be communicated to
the Government servant who should be supplied with a copy of the report of
enquiry, a copy of the findings of Government on each of the articles of
charge; and a copy of the recommendation of the Vigilance Commissioner.
(c) If on the other hand it is decided to impose having regard to the findings of
all or any of the articles of charges, any of the penalties mentioned in clause
(v) to (viii) of rule 8, then-
**(i) A notice may be issued stating the penalty proposed to be imposed on
him and calling upon him to submit within 15 days of the receipt of the
notice, such representation as he may wish to make on the proposed
penalty. Copies of the report of inquiry the findings on each of the
articles of charges the brief reasons for disagreement, if any, with the
findings of the inquiring Authority and the recommendation of the
Vigilance Commissioner, should also be furnished to the Government
servant alongwith the notice.
Note:- If the findings of Government under sub-paras (a), (b) or (c) of this para
are inconsistent with the recommendation of the Vigilance
Commissioner, orders of the Cabinet should be obtained.
(ii) On receipt of the reperesentation, if any, from the Government
servant, the record of enquiry together with the notice issued to
theGovernment servant and the representation of the Government servant
with reference to the notice should be sent to the Karnataka Public
Service Commission for advice.
(iii) On receipt of the advice of the Commission orders should be passed by
Government determining the penalty if any to be imposed on the
Government servant and any other order as order as deemed fit. If the
final orders proposed to be passed are at vary once with the advice of the
Public Service Commission, orders of the Cabinet should be obtained.
3. Orders passed by the Government should be communicated to the Government
servant as required by rule 12-A.
**Note:- The procedure of issuing Second Show cause notice is not required to be
followed in cases of inquiries after 15-1-77 in view of amendment of rule
11-A of C.C.A. Rules.
sd/-
Section Officer, DPAR (SR-C)
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 29th December 1979.
CIRCULAR
Clarifications are being sought in several cases as to when an order suspending a
Government Servant from duty takes effect and when an order revoking the order of
suspension comes into force, and on other related matters. It is therefore considered
necessary to clarify the position for the guidance of all concerned. Accordingly the
following clarifications are issued.
2. (a) If the Government servant who has been suspended by the competent authority
is on duty, the order takes effect from the date it is communicated to him and
he is releived of his duty. It is, therefore, necessary that the authority who
passes the order of suspension should also specify the officer who should take
charge of the office held by the Government servant who is placed under
suspension. If the authorities which passes the order of suspension is different
from the authority which is competent to make arrangement for relief of the
suspended Government servant by posting a substitute, then the former should
communicate to the Government servant the order of his suspension through
the latter who should simultaneously communicate to the suspension
Government servant both the order of suspension and the order making
arragement for his releif.
(b) If on the other hand the Government servant who has been suspended is not on
duty at the time when the order of suspension is passed, then the order takes
effect from the date of its despatch by registered post, if sent by post, or from
the date of its communication to the Government servant if communicated in
person.
(c) An order revoking the suspension order comes into force from the date of its
receipt by the Government servant under suspension. The revocation order
should, therefore, specify the place of his posting also so that he might go and
assume charge of the office immediately. If the order revoking suspension
does not indicate the place of his posting he would not be in a position to
assume charge of any office though the suspension has been revoked. This
leads to avodiable complications, infructuous expenditure and unnecessary
correspondance, in that the period from the date of receipt of this order by the
Government servant and the date he assumes charges of the office has to be
treated as compulsory waiting period for this purpose the matter has to be
referred to the Staff Screening Committee and payment of salary for the period
has to be made without taking any work from the Government servant.
3. The Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are requested to bear in
mind the position explained above while passing orders in matters relating to suspension
of Government servants. They are also requested to bring this to the notice of all the
appointing authorities and other officers under their administrative control who are
competent to place Government servants under suspension and make orders in matters
connected thereto.
sd/-
Teresa Bhattcharya,
Dept. of Personnel & Admnv. Reforms,
(Personnel Division).
Circular No. DPAR 18 SSR 79, dated 2nd March 1979

Sub:- Departmental Enquiries - cases to be referred to Chief Secretary -
procedure, regarding.
Cased relating to Departmental Inquries are being referred to the Chief Secretary by the
Administrative Departments of the Secretariat before issuing final orders, Invariably, such
cases contain complicated facts which may required analysis in detail with reference to the
provisions of K.C.S. (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, Circular instructions
issued in the matter, decided case laws and precedents. Such cases have to be examined
by the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Service Rules) before they
are submitted to the Chief Secretary.
2. The Administrative Departments should themselves examine such cases first at their
level, with reference to the rules, etc., and put up notes indicating the facts of case and
specifying their own views thereon and then refer the file to the Department of Personnel
and Administrative Reforms. The reference note should clearly indicate the specific
points on which interpretation of rules of orders is sought as this would facilitate quick
examination of the cases by the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms and
formulation and communication of its views thereon without delay.
3. Such a procedure, should also be followed in case relating to other service matters
such as recruitments, promotions, seniority etc. of Government servants, referred to the
Chief Secretary or the DPAR (Service Rules).
4. The Secretaries to Government may please bring these instructions to the notices of
all the concerned officers and officials in their Departments.
Circular No. DPAR 30 SSR 79, dated 17th April 1979
Sub:- Un-authorised absence of Government servants, Instructions regarding
Quick Disposal of enquiry cases.
It was come to the notice of Government that in several cases in which Government
servants have remained absent unauthorisedly, either no action has been taken against
them or in some cases where action has been initiated, it is done after a lapse of
considerable time. Unless timely, steps are taken in such cases effective disciplinary
action cannot be taken against the erring officials and the posts held by these absentees
remain vacant causing considerable dislocation of work as it would not be possible to post
substitutes in their places.
A Government servant does not cease to be a member of the services to which he is
appointed or sever connections with the post held by him by reason of his un-authorised
absence unless action is taken aganist him by the appointing authority / competent
disciplinary authority under KCS (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules 1957 and he
is removed or dismissed from service after conducting an inquiry in accordance with rules
11 and 11A of these rules.
Normally it should not take much time to hold an inquiry and finalise action in
accoradance with rule 11 and rule 11A of the KCS (Classification, Control and Appeal)
Rules. If the Government servant refused to receive notices / orders of the competent
authority, the procedure laid down under rule 28-A of the KCS (Classification, Control
and Appeal) Rules could be followed conveniently and if necessary, and ex-parte inquiry
held aganist him and final orders passed removing or dismissing him from service if the
charge of un-authorised absence is established.
The Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are requested to take
necessary action in the matter and bring these instructions to the pointed notice of
appointing authorities / disciplinary authorities under their control, and see that delays in
instituting / finalising inquiries in such cases are avoided. Any delay in taking action in
such cases would be viewed seriously and the concerned officer who has failed to take
action or delayed taking action will be held personally responsible and disciplinary action
would have to be initiated against him for the lapse.
Circular No. DPAR 46 SSR 79, dated 28th June 1979

Sub:- Appointment of Presenting Officers in Disciplinary cases under the
CCA Rules
Under rule 11(5) (c) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules 1957 the disciplinary authority could nominate a Government servant as a
Presenting Officer to present the case on behalf of the disciplinary authority in a
departmental inquiry instituted aganist any other Government servant. The Government
servant to be nominated as the Presenting Officer would normally be the one who is
working under the control/jurisdiction of the concerned Disciplinary Authority. If for any
reasons, the Disciplinary Authority proposes to appoint a Government servant who is not
under its control / jurisidiction but under the control of any other Authority, the former
Authority has, necessarily, to consult the latter Authority and seek its concurrence before
appointing such a Government servant as the Presenting Officer.
All the Disciplinary Authorities in various Departments and Offices should keep in
view, the above position and ensure that as far as possible, only the Government servants
under their jurisdiction are appointed as Presenting Officers in cases relating to
disciplinary proceedings and if any other Government servant is to be nominated as
Presenting Officer, the concerned Disciplinary Authority under whose control the
Government servant is working should invariably be consulted.
All the Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are requested to bring
the above instructions to the notice of all the Disciplinary / Appointing Authorities under
their control.
Circular No. DPAR 2 SIN 79, dated 4th July 1979

Sub:- Communications to be addressed to the Vigilance Commission -
Instruction - reg.
Ref:- Circular No. DPAR 191 PVC 78, dated 21st November 1978.
Instructions were issued in the Circular read above that all communications to the
Vigilance Commission should be addressed to the Director of State Vigilance Commission
excepting in the case of D.O. letters meant for the personal attention of the Vigilance
Commissioner which could be addressed to him.
2. In spite of these instructions, it has been brought to the notice of Government, that
even ordinary letters are being addressed directly to the Vigilance Commissioners. It has
how been decided that all communications meant for the Vigilance Commission must be
addressed to the Director Vigilance in the Vigilance Commission and no communication
should be addressed to the Vigilance Commmissioners.
3. All the Secretaries to Government and the Heads of Departments are requested to
ensure that in future Communications meant for the Vigilance Commission are addressed
to the Director of Vigilance only.
No.DPAR 71 PVC 78. Karnataka Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 17th July, 1979.
CIRCULAR
Sub:- Reinstatement of Government servants placed under suspension at the request
of the State Vigilance commission.
Whenever a complaint of corruption etc., is made against a Government servant and
the Vigilance Commission held a preliminary enquiry and reports to Government that a
prima facie case is made out against him and requests that he should be placed under
suspension, that person is placed under suspension immediately.
2. The question whether such Government servant might be reinstated subsequently
with or without the prior concurrence of the Vigilance Commission, has been examined.
3. It is now decided that, whenever it is proposed to reinstate in service a Government
servant, who has been placed under suspension, at the instance of the Vigilance
Commission, irrespective of the period for he has been placed under suspension, prior
concurrence of the Commission might be obtained. In other words, the supension should
not be revoked, automatically just because the Government servant has been under
suspension for a period exceeding six months and some delay on the part of the
Commission is anticipated in finalising the enquiry and in sending a report to Government.
4. The Commission has assured Government that any request for reinstatement will
normally be disposed of within the shortest time possible.
5. These instructions supersede all others issued so far in this regard.
sd/-
N.Narasimha rau,
Chief Secretary to
Government
Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 -

Amendment of rule 11 'A' - Further clarification in respect of issue of Second Show
Cause Notice.
Circular No. DPAR 56 SSR 78, dated 16th August 1979
Ref:- Circular No. DPAR 70, SSR 76, dated 29th January, 1977.
Consequent upon the amendment of Rule 11-A and some other rules of Karnataka
Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 made under Government
Notification No. DPAR 70 SSR 76, dated 15th January 1977, instructions were issued in
the Circular referred to above that before imposing any of the penalties specified in
clauses (v) to (viii) of Rule 8 of the Classification, Control and Appeal rules, it was not
necessary to issue second show cause notice. It has also been specified that when the
second show cause notice had already been issued to a Government servant before the
date of coming into force of the aforesaid amendment, a reply thereto might be awaited
and the representation if any submitted by such Government servant should be taken into
consideration before any final orders were issued.
The matter has been re-examined in consultation with the law Department. Though
Legally it may not be necessary, it is considered advisable, that in repsect of proccedings
started prior to 42nd amendment of the Constitution or prior to the amendment of the
Classification, Control and Appeal Rules, which are still pending with the disciplinary
authorities to issue the second show cause notice as who contemplated prior to the
amendment. This is necessary with a view to avoiding a possible contention being raised
before the Court that the requirement of Second Show Cause notice has not been followed
on the plea that the proceedings that were pending as on the date of 42nd amendment of
the Constitution should be considered and finalised in accordance with the Law as it
existed prior to the amendment.
All Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are requested kindly to
keep in view the above instructions while dealing the disciplinary cases of the kind
mentioned above and also to bring them to the notice of several appointing and
disciplinary authorities under their control.
Vidhana Soudha,
CIRCULAR
Under Note 1 below rule 98(B) of the Karnataka Civil Service Rules prior to its
deletion, sanction of Government was necessary for extension of the periods of suspension
of Government servants beyond the initial 6 months period. By the amendment issued in
Government Notification No. FD 78 SRS 77 dated 12.7.1978 the aforesaid note was
deleted. Consequently sanction of Government for the continued suspension of
Government servants beyond 6 months is not necessary even though such cases are
required to be reported to Government in terms of rule 10(5) of the Karnataka Civil
Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 for such orders as the
Government may deem fit. The Government servants who are placed under suspension
without indicating in the order suspending them any specific period(s) of suspension will
continue under suspension till it is revoked by the authority which suspended them, or any
higher authority or Government but sanction of Government is no more required for
continuing them under suspension beyond the initial period of 6 months.
Doubts have also been raised as to whether sanction of Government is necessary for
payment of subsistence allowances for period beyond 6 months to the Government
servants who continue under suspension.
It is hereby clarified that such sanction of Government is also not necessary. The
authority which made or is deemed to have made the order of suspension is itself
competent to regulate the quantum of subsistence allowance payable to Government
servants under suspension, in accordance with the provisions of Rule 98(A) of Karnataka
Civil Service Rules.
sd/-
B.B.Bajentri,
Dept. of Personnel & Admnv.
Reforms,
(Services Rules-I).
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 28th April 1980.
CIRCULAR
The number of cases relating to departmental enquiries aganist Government servants
being handled at the Government level in the Secretariat has been on the increase.
Government are, no doubt, the appointing authority in relation to Class I and Class II posts
and they alone are competent under the existing provisions of the rules to impose major
penalities; but that does not imply that complaint or allegation aganist Class II officers
should come to Government. One of the reasons for the increase in work in the Secretariat
is that even in cases where the Heads of Departments are themselves competent under the
rules to take certain action, references are being made to Government. It is, therefore,
considered necessary to bring to the notice of the Heads of Departments and others the
relevant provisions contained in the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules, 1957 according to which power is vested in them to initiate departmental
enquiries even against Government servants in Class II service and others although
Government are the appointing authority in their respect.
2. Under clause (b) of sub-rule (2) of Ruel 9 of the rules referred to above the Heads of
Departments are vested with the power of imposing on Class II officers certain minor
penaltites specified therein. Under the other clauses of this rule the Inspector General of
Police, the Divisional Commissioners, the Joint Development Commissioners and other
specified therein are competent to impose the specified minor penalties under different
clauses of the rule. Eventhough they have the power to impose only certain minor
penalities it is permissible for them to institute under sub-rule (2) of Rule 10A disciplinary
proceedings aganist Class II officers for the purpose of imposing any of the major penalty
specified in clauses (v) to (viii) of rule 8. They could accordingly initiate disciplinary
proceedings against class II officers also. If after the Heads of Departments or any other
authority who is competent to impose any of the minor penalties, institutes accordingly an
enquiry under rule 11 and after the completion of the enquiry, comes to the conclusion
that, having regard to the gravity of the mis-conduct established against a Class II officers,
imposition of any of the major penalities is justified and warranted he can forward the
records of enquiry to Government. This is specifically provided for in sub-rule (21) of
rule 11 of the rules. Thus it could be seen that it is not always necessary that every
complaint or an allegation against a Class II officer should be referred to Government for
initiating disciplinary proccedings; the Heads of Department could initiate proceedings not
only under rule 12 but also under rule 11 of the Rules.
3. The Heads of Departments and other authorities who are competent to impose any of
the minor penalties on Class II officers or other gazetted officers may kindly note for
guidance the position explained in the foregoing paragraphs and avoid unnecessary
references to Government even in cases where they are competent to initiate disciplinary
proceedings and send a report to Government only at the stage of imposing a major
penalty, where such a punishment is called for.
sd/-
N.Narasimha rau,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 1st October 1980.
CIRCULAR
Sub:- Service of Order, Notices etc. under Rule 28A of the K.C.S. (Classification,
Control & Appeal) Rules, 1957.
Ref:- Circular No. DPAR 30 SSR 79, dated 17.4.1979
Instructions have been issued in the Circular referred to above regarding the manner
in which the cases of Government Servants who have remained or who remain absent
unauthorisedly from duty are to be dealt with. In the matter of service of notices / orders it
has been indicated that the procedure specified in rule 28A of the Karnataka Civil Services
(Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 be followed:-
2. The modes of service contemplated in this rule are:-
(a) service in person on the Government Servants concerned; or
(b) service by registered post; or
(c) service by affixing a copy thereof on the notice board of the office of the
Disciplinary Authority or of the Enquiring Authority and upon some
conspicious part of the house, if any, in which he is known to have last
resided; or
(d) by publication in two daily news papers having wide circulation in the State.
3. In this connection, the disciplinary authorities / Inquiring authorities are advised to
resort to the procedure mentioned under item (d) in para 2 above only where service in
accordance with the mode mentioned under items (a) to (c) in the said para is not possible.
mind the procedure mentioned above while serving notice under Rule 28A of
Classification, Control and Appeal Rules. They are also requested to bring this to the
notice of all the appointing authorities under their administrative control.
sd/-
M.K.Jothisenthan,
Additional Secretary to Government,
Reforms.
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated the 17th October 1980.
CIRCULAR
Sub:- Suspension of Government Servants - further instructions regarding.
Ref:- Circular No. DPAR 24 SSR 77, dated 16.8.1978.
In the Circular referred to above, it is clarified, among other things, that a suspension
order issued for a specified period lapses on the expiry of the period, that orders
continuing suspension issued after the expiry of the period with a time gape is ineffective
and not enforceable and that the Government Servant is deemed to be on duty on the date
of expiry of the suspension period.
2. The above clarification holds good if the suspended official to whom the order of
suspension specifying the period of suspension is communicated reports to duty on the
expiry of the period of suspension. Then there is no option but to consider him as on duty.
If he does not report to duty eventhough it is known to him that the order of suspension
has expired, his absence after the expiry of the period of suspension is unauthorised
absence and should be dealt with under rule 106-A read with rule 108 of the Karnataka
Civil Service Rules.
3. The Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are requested to follow
these instructions strictly. They are also requested to bring this position to the notice of all
the appointing authorities and other authorities under their administrative control who are
competent to place Government Servants under suspesion and pass orders for revocation
of suspension of Government Servants.
sd/-
A.H.Someshwar,
Reforms,
(Service Rules).
Vidhana Soudha,
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Departmental Inquiry - Appointing Deputy Commissioners of Inquiries or
Assistant Commissioners of Inquiries of the Karnataka State Vigilance
Commission as the Inquiry Officers.
The Public Accounts Committee while considering the Appropriation and Finance
Accounts and Audit Reports relating to one of the Secretariat Departments suggested
appointment of whole time Inquiry Officers in Government Departments to deal with
disciplinary cases exclusively to ensure speedy disposal of cases since regular officers
could not bestow much attention on these cases. Similar suggestion to appoint Inquiry
Officers in each Division / District to deal with disciplinary cases pertaining to various
departments in the Division / District was also made by some of the Divisional
Commissioners.
2. This suggestion was examined by Government in consulation with the State
Vigilance Commission. The Commission after considering the matter opined that there
was no need for creation of posts of Inquiry Officers in Government Departments at State
Level or Divisional / District Level for Inquiring into allegations of serious nature aganist
Government servants and suggested that such cases would very well be referred to the
Vigilance Commission for Inquiry.
3. There are certain advantages in entrusting the complicated cases relating to
departmental action against Government Servants to the Commission. The Commission
has Inquiry Officers with Judicial outlook and experience and is, therefore, better
equipped to handle and finalise Inquiry cases not only expeditiously but also in accordance
with law. It has also other staff who are conversant with the rules of natural justice and
other laws relating to quasi-judicial functions.
4. Government have, therefore, decided to accept the suggestion of the Commission. In
respect of cases investigated by it, the Commission acquires jurisdiction to hold Inquiries
if such cases are referred to the Commission by Government for holding Inquiry in terms
of rule 11 of Karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1957. In respect of the other cases, it
has been decided that officers of the Commission should be appointed as Inquiry Officers
who should submit their reports to the Disciplinary Authorities concerend. As a first step,
it has been decided that this procedure should be adopted in respect of cases pending or to
be initiated at the level of Government (i.e. Secretariat Departments) and at the level of
Heads of Departments.
5. Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are, therefore, requested to
make a list of Inquiry cases pending with them indicating therein the names and
designations of the Accused Government Officers and send the list to the Secretary,
Karnataka State Vigilance Commission, with a request to suggest the names of the
Commissioners or Deputy Commisssioners of the Commission who could be appointed as
the Inquiry Officers. Soon after the Commision suggests the names of the Officers to be
so appointed, necessary orders appointing them as Inquiry Officers should be issued
immediately. Articles of charges issued to the Accused Government Officers and written
statement of defence submitted by them should be sent to the Inquiry Officers and, in
cases where presenting officers are appointed, their names should also be communicated.
Similar procedure should be adopted in respect of Inquiries to be initiated hereafter.
6. The list of pending cases as referred to above should please be forwarded to the
Secretary, Karnataka State Vigilance Commission, before the end of July and a copy
thereof should be endorsed to the Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms
(Service Rules).
sd/-
A.H.Someshwar,
Reforms,
(Service Rules).
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 17th August 1981.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Departmental Inquiry - Appointing Deputy Commissioners of Inquiries or
Assistant Commissioners of Inquiries of the Karnataka State Vigilance
Commission as the Inquiry Officers.
Ref:- O.M. No. DPAR 5 SSR 79, dated 8.7.1981.
In the O.M. dated 8.7.1981 it was ordered that in disciplinary inquiry cases pending
or to be initiated at the level of Government (i.e. Secretariat Departments) and at the level
of Heads of Department, the officers of the Karnataka State Vigilance Commission should
be appointed as Inquiry Officers and that they should submit their reports to the
disciplinary authorities concerend.
2. Disciplinary inquiry cases could be instituted under Rule 11 and Rule 12 of the
Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules. A question has arisen
whether in respect of cases instituted under Rule 12 also the officers of the Vigilance
Commission should be appointed as Inquiry Officers.
3. Cases coming under Rule 12 are generally of simple nature and except in cases
coming within the purview of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of the said Rule 12, no inquiry is
involved and, therefore, the question of referring such cases to the Vigilance Commission
for appointing Inquiry Officers does not arise. Even in cases coming under clause (b) of
sub-rule (1) of Rule 12 where an inquiry has to be held in the manner laid down in sub-
rule (3) to (23) of rule 11, the inquiry would be for award of minor penalty and it is
considered not necessary to entrust such inquirieis of simple nature to the officers of the
4. Government have, therefore, decided in partial modification of the instructions
issued in O.M. No. DPAR 5 SSR 79, dated 8.7.1981, that inquiry cases instituted under
Rule 12 of the K.C.S (CCA) Rules, 1957, need not be referred to the Karnataka State
Vigilance Commission and only the cases instituted under Rule 11 may be referred to the
Commission in the manner prescribed in the O.M. dated 8.7.1981.
5. Inquiries are being made by several departments whether pending cases should be
referred to the Karnataka State Vigilance Commission in accordance with the instructions
contained in the O.M. dated 8.7.1981. It is clarified that pending cases instituted under
Rule 11 may be referred to the Karnataka State Vigilance Commission only if the
recording of evidence has not commenced. Pending cases where one or more witnesses
have been examined either partly or fully need not referred to the Vigilance Commission
and the existing Inquiry Officers may be asked to continue the inquiry.
sd/-
A.H.Someshwar,
Reforms,
(Service Rules).
No.DPAR 96 KLU 81. Karnataka Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 29th October 1981.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Investigation/Inquiry Reports by the Karnataka State Vigilance Commission -
Prompt disposal of- instructions - rega.
Ref:- D.O. No. GAD 23 IPN 75, dated 17.6.1975 from the Chief Secretary to
Government (Copy enclosed)
In the D.O. letter referred to above caused for delay in handling the reports of
investigation / inquires held by the Karnataka State Vigilance Commission into the
allegations against Government servants were analysed and brought to the notice of all the
concerned. Guidelines were also issued indicating the procedure to be followed in
handling such cases and the need for avoiding delays in dealing with these reports was
emphasized.
If proper procedure is followed and reports are handled in the prescribed manner,
there should not be any reason for delay. In spite of clear instructions issued in the matter,
the State Vigilance Commissioner has recently pointed out delays in impelmenting the
recommendations of the Commission and has suggested avoidance of such delays as a
measure of eradication of corruption.
Government, hereby reiterate the earlier instructions and once again emphasize the
need for avoiding delay in dealing with the reports of the Karnataka State Vigilance
Commmision. All secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are requested to
bear in mind the instructions contained in the D.O. letter dated 17-6-1975 of the Chief
Secretary referred to above and follow the procedure indicated in the note appended
thereto in dealing with the reports of invesigation and report of inquiry from the Vigilance
Commission and ensure that prompt action is taken in these cases. The Secretaries to
Government and Heads of Departments are also requested to bring to the notice of all the
concerned officers under their control who handle such cases, the procedure indicated in
the said note.
sd/-
R.A.Naik,
No.DPAR 466 SAS 81. Karnataka Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 3rd November 1981.
CIRCULAR
Sub:- Issue of instructions regarding rendering of assistance by Government Servants
to the Vigilance Commission in departmental inquiries.
In the circulars No. GAD 57 PVC 74, dated the 16th September, 1974 and the 27th
December, 1974 instructions have been issued to all Heads of Departments and Secretaries
to Government to ensure that whenever any officer of the Vigilance Commission makes a
request for any assistance during the course of investigation the same should be rendered
immediately without having to obtain orders of the higher authorities and keep such
information given or discussions made as confidential. The Heads of Departments were
also requested to issue instructions to their subordinate officers in this behalf. It was made
clear that any instance of non-co-operation by any official would be viewed seriously by
the Government.
2. Despite these instructions the Vigilance Commission has brought to the notice of the
Government that investigations taken up by the Vigilance Commission against
Government Servants are held up for considerable time on account of lack of co-operation
by the officials concerned with the investigating officers. It has also been brought to the
notice of the Government that non-cooperation persists despite requests made
demiofficially to the higher authorities in that behalf.
3. Government have taken serious note of this position and it is hereby against directed
that every Government Servant required to furnish any information within his/her
knowledge in official capacity to any investigating officer of the Vigilance Commission
should make available the same within the shortest possible time. The Heads of
Departments are requested to ensure that this is done. In any case where a Government
Servant is found to show non-cooperation in this matter and in cases where instances of
non-cooperation have been brought to the notice of the Heads of the Departments by the
Vigilance Commission or the investigating authorities, appropriate departmental action
should be taken against the Government Servant concerned.
sd/-
R.A.Naik,
Additional Chief Secretary to Government.
No. DPAR 59 SDE 81. Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated the 17th December 1981.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Suspension of Government servants - Review of cases of prolonged
suspension.
In Confidentail O.M. No. DPAR 11 SSR 77, dated the 5the July 1977, all appointing
authorities and officers authorised to place Government servants under suspension were
required to review cases of suspension of Government servants on charges of
misappropriation, embezzlement of Government money or corruption and where the court
cases or disciplinary proceedings instituted aganist them were likely to drag on for a long
time. According to these instructions the concerned authorities were required to consider
the circustances of each case and decide whether the order of suspension might be revoked
and the Government servant given a posting to a place where handling of Government
money was not involved or where there was no scope for corrpution. While taking a
decision on this issue the concerned authorities were also required to examine whether
there was any likelihood of the Government servants tampering with any evidence or
influencing any witness if he was so reinstated. The seriousness of the charge aganist the
Government servant in the criminal or disciplinary case was also required to be taken into
account.
2. While reiterating the instructions issued in O.M. dated the 5th July 1977 referred to
above, the appointing authorities and officers authorised to place Government servants
under suspension are requested to take immediate action to review all such cases of
suspension and consider reinstatement of the Government servants concerned in the event
of the investigation/inquiry being likely to be prolonged and reinstate them.
3. These instructions would not apply to cases where suspension was ordered at the
instance of the Vigilance Commission and also to cases where Government servants were
placed under suspension on charges other than misappropriation, embezzlement of
Government money or corruption.
sd/-
A.H.Someshwar,
Dept. of Personnel & Admnv. Reforms,
(Service Rules).
No.LAW 166 LAG 81 Karnataka Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated 18th December 1981.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
It has been observed that in good number of cases in which the State of Karnataka is
a party, decisions of the Courts go aganist it. This has not only embarassed the State but
has also contributed considerably to the delay in implementing the several welfare
measures, besides forcing the state to incur avoidable huge expenditure, which the State
can ill afford in the present critical financial position. An immediate necessity has
therefore arisen to undertake a through study of the cases in which the decisions of the
Courts have gone aganist the State with a view to finding out the exact causes as to why
Courts had to give decisions adverse to the State.
2. Broadly speaking the reasons for the decisions adverse to the State could be
attributed to one or more of the following reasons:-
(1) failure on the part of the departments concerned to place the full facts and
the records relevant to the case before the Court;
(2) failure to present the State's case effectively i.e. failure to file suitable
statement with all relevant facts and law and to point out the relevant ruling,
if any, of the Courts in support of the State's case;
(3) the defective drafting of the law rules, orders etc; and
(4) not following of rules and procedure prescribed by law.
3. However, in order to pin point where excatly the defect lay in each case and to take
remedial steps in order to see that such a defect does not reoccur it has been decided that a
review of the records relating to the cases in which decisions have been given by the
courts aganist the state should be undertaken in a meeting of the following officers:-
1. Additional Chief Secretary;
2. Advocate-General or his representative;
3. Secretary to Government of the concerned department; and
4. Secretary to Government, Department of Law and Parliamentary Affairs.
4. To begin with, it has been decided that such a review should be confined to the
orders made aganist the State by the High Court in Writ Petitions or Writ Appeals. The
process of such a review could be extended to the decisions of the other Courts also in
furture.
5. After the close of a month and in the first week of the succeeding month the
Department of Law and Parliamentary Affairs would collect copies of the orders of the
Courts in which decisions are given aganist the State during the previous month and
convene a meeting in the chambers of the Additional Chief Secretary on a date and time in
the second week of the succeeding month to be notified. The meeting will be attended to
by the Advocate-General or his representative, the Secretary to Government, Department
of Law and Parliamentary Affairs and the Secretary to Government of the department
concerned for the purpose of the review.
6. The first meeting to review the orders of the High Court received in the month of
December 1981 would accordingly be held in the month of January 1982.
7. In complicated and important cases as and when arguments are scheduled to be
heard by the High Court it is desirable to have meetings of the Advocate in charge of the
case, the Secretary of the department concerned and the Secretary to Government,
Department of Law and Parliamentary Affairs a day or two earlier to the date fixed for
arguments and again once or twice as may be necessary if the arguments last for more than
one or two days to study the progress of the case and the points raised in the Court so that
a combined effort may be made to effectively meet the points raised by the other side.
Secretary, Department of Law and Parliamentary Affairs who will be in touch with the
concerned Advocates will kindly arrange for such meetings.
8. All the Secretaries to Government are requested to extend their full co-operation in
this exercise.
sd/-
R.A.Naik,
Additional Chief Secretary to
Government.
No.LAW 166 LAG 81(P) Karnataka Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated : 4th March 1982.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Review of judgements wherein decisions have been given by the Courts aganist
the State.
Ref:- O.M. No. LAW 166 LAG 81, dated 18.12.1981.
Para 5 of the O.M. dated 18.12.1981 referred to above envisages convening of a
meeting in the chambers of the Additional Chief Secretary on a date and time in the
second week of the succeeding month to be notified, for reviewing the judgements relating
to the cases wherein decisions have been given by the Courts aganist the State.
It is now considered necessary that such review should be taken at the level of the
Chief Secretary to Government of Karnataka.
In partial modifications of O.M. dated 18.12.1981 referred to above, it is hereby
directed that the meeting as envisaged in para 5 of the aforesaid O.M. shall be convened
under the Chairmanship of the Chief Secretary to Government of Karnataka in the last
week of the succeeding month (date and time to be fixed in consultation with the Chief
Secretary).
sd/-
R.A.Naik,
No.DPAR 12 SDE 82 Karnataka Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated : 13th April 1982.
CIRCULAR
Sub:- Departmental proceedings aganist Government servants placed under
suspension- Delay in instituting
Ref:- i) O.M.No. GAD 21 SSR 65, dated 26.2.1965
ii) O.M.No. DPAR 11 SSR 77, dated 5.7.1977
iii) O.M.No. DPAR 59 SDE 81, dated 17.12.1981
Rule 10 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules,
1957, provides for placing a Government servant under suspension, when, among other
things, disciplinary proceedings aganist him are contemplated. This is only an enabling
provision. Whether in individual cases where disciplinary proceedings are proposed
Government servant should be suspended or not should be determined with reference to
the guidelines contained in the O.M cited at (i) above. But once a decision is taken to
suspend a Government servant for the reason that disciplinary proceedings are proposed to
be instituted, it is imperative to ensure that the disciplinary proceedings are instituted
without delay in the official memoranda cited at (ii) and (iii) above detailed instructions
have been issued for review of cases of suspension. The Central idea of these instructions
are that there should not be prolonged suspension which have, apart from adverse effects
on the Government servants concerned, serious financial implications also.
2) In a recent cases a Government servant was placed under suspension but no-action
was taken to institute disciplinary proceedings for over nine months. When the aggrieved
Government servants filed a Writ Petition, the Court was constained to direct the authorty
concerned to take the Government servant back to duty.
3) Government, therefore, direct that when a Government servant is placed under
suspensions pending institution of disciplinary proceedings, action to institute such
proceeding should be taken within a period of three months from date of suspension. In
complicated cases involving detailed investigation etc. that time may be extended upto to
total period of six months.
4) Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments should seriously view failure
to comply with these instructions and take appropriate action aganist those responsible.
sd/-
M.K.Venkateshan,
Additional Chief Secretary.
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated the 9th April 1982.
CIRCULAR
Rule 18 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules
1957 provides for appeal aganist orders imposing penalties and rule 25 prescribes the
procedure for consideration of such appeals and their disposal. While reviewing the
orders of Courts in accordance with O.M.No.LAW 166 LAG 81, dated 18-12-1981 it is
noticed that the Appellate Authorities pass very breif orders sometimes one sentance order
like 'appeal considered and rejected' - such brief orders are technically defective and
voilative of rules of natural justice and are, therefore, being quashed by the Courts or by
the Governor while excersising his powers of review. As a result, Government servants
who deserve, on merits of the case, severe penalties unpunished. It is therefore necessary
that all the Appellate Authorities strictly follow the procedure prescribed in Rule 25 of the
rules before they pass final orders.
2) The important points to be borne in mind by the Appellate Authorities while
considering the appeals are
i) Whether the appeal was filed within the period of limitation prescribed
ii) Whether the disciplinary authority has followed the prescribed procedure
before passing final orders,
iii) Whether in a case before the inquiry officer has been appointed to hold
inquiry and the disciplinary authority proposes to accept the recommendation
of the inquiry officers, the several steps prescribed in rule 11 of the rules
have been taken by the Inquiring Officer and whether he has analysed,
appreciated and evaluated the evidence for and aganist the charges and
whether he has dealt within his orders each of the contentions raised by the
concerned accused Government officers and whether the Inquiring Officer
has given reasons for his conclusions.
iv) Whether the disciplinary authority has complied with the requirements of
rule 11-A or Rule 12 as the case may be; and
v) Whether the penalty is adequate, inadequate or excessive.
3) The Appellate Authority should consider the contensions raised by both sides and
give his findings therein. He should not hesitate to accept errors, if any, committed by the
Inquiry Officer and to give proper relief if wrong has been done to the accused officer. He
should decide the case without bias in a spirit of and with the sense of responsibility of a
Tribunal so that the departmental remedy, by way of appeal, provided for in the rules does
not become illusory.
4) Any lapse on the part of the Appellate Authorities in this behalf would be viewed by
Government seriously.
sd/-
M.K.Venkateshan,
Additional Chief Secretary.
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated the 28th April 1982.
CIRCULAR
clarification regarding second show cause notice.
Ref:- i) Circular No. DPAR 70 SSR 76 dated, 29.1.77
ii) Circular No. DPAR 56 SSR 78, dated, 16.8.79.
Consequent on the amendment of Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India by the
Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, Rules 11-A, 25 and 26 of the Karnataka Civil
Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1957, were amended in Notification
No.DPAR 70 SSR 76, dated 15.1.77. The main object of the amendment of Article 311(2)
was to do away with what was generally known as "the second show cause notice." In the
Circular cited at (i) above it was clarified that after the amendment of the Rules it was not
necessary to issue the second show cause notice. In the Circular cited at (ii) above it was,
however pointed out that in respect of proceedings started prior to the 42nd amendment of
the Constitution or prior to the amendment of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification,
Control & Appeal) Rules, 1957, and which were pending with the disciplinary authorities,
it was advisable to issue the seond show cause notice as was necessary prior to the
amendment.
2) This issue was examined by a Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka in
W.P. No. 17572 of 1980 (M.P.Naik Vs. the State of Karnataka and others). The court held
the view, among others, that the opportunity to show cause to be given to the Government
servant after furnishing a copy of Inquiry Officer's report was a part of the reasonable
opportunity of being heard contemplated by Article 311(2) before as well as after its
amendment and that what was denied by the amendment of Article 311(2) was only an
opportunity of making representations in regard to the proposed penalty. According to the
court, the amendment did not take away the right of Government servant to be supplied
with a copy of the report of the Inquiry Officer and to an opportunity of showing cause
vis-a-vis the findings recorded by the Inquiry Officer in his report.
3) The State Government have appealed to the Supreme Court. But pending decision
on the appeal, it is considered necessary to comply with the direction of the High Court of
Karnataka in the W.P. referred to above.
4) Thus, in modification of the instructions contained in the Circulars read above,
Government direct that before passing the final orders imposing any of the penalties
specified in clauses (v) to (viii) of rule 8 of the K.C.S. (C.C.&A) Rules, 1957, on a
Government servant, a copy of the Inquiry Officer's report should be given to the
Government servant providing him an opportunity of showing cause why the findings
recorded by the Inquiry Officer in his report should not be accepted. It is not necessary to
intimate him the tentative decision of the disciplinary authority in regard to the penalty
proposed.
5) The Secretaries to Government and the Heads of Departments are requested to bring
the above instruction to the notice of all Disciplinary Authorities/Appointing Authorties
sd/-
A.H.Someshwar,
Reforms,
(Service Rules).
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, Dated the 17th July 1982.
CIRCULAR
further clarification regarding second show cause notice.
Ref:- Circular No.DPAR 8 SDE 82 dated 28-4-1982.
In the circular dated 28-4-1982 referred to above, it was clarified, among others, that
before passing final orders imposing any of the penalties specified in clauses (v) to (viii)
of rule 8 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1957
on a Government servant, a copy of the Inquiry Officer's report should be given to the
Government servant thus providing him an opportunity of showing cause why the findings
recorded by the Inquiry Officer in his report should not be accepted.
2) This matter has been further examined and the following further clarifications are
issued:
(i) In a case where the Disciplinary Authority proposes to disagree with the
findings of the Inquiry Officer on all or any of articles of charge, the findings
of the disciplinary authority specifying reasons for such disagreement may
also be communicated together with a copy of the Inquiry Officer's report to
the Government servant.
(ii) When an inquiry has been conducted by the Viglance Commission under
Rule 14-A of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control &
Appeal) Rules, 1957 and report of the Inquiry Officer's and the
recommendations of the Vigilance Commission are received by the
Government, a copy of recommendations of the Vigilance Commissioner
should also be supplied along with a copy of Inquiry Officer's report to the
Government servant.
3) The Secretaries of Government and the Heads of Departments are requested to bring
the above instructions to the notice of all Disciplinary Authorities/Appointing Authorities
sd/-
A.H.Someshwar,
Reforms,
(Service Rules).
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated the 1st June. 1983
CIRCULAR
Sub:- Review of disciplinary cases which are pending finalisation-prescription of
monthly progress report.
It has been observed that in processing the departmental inquries instituted against
Government servants, the Disciplinary/Appointing Authorities are not bestowing their
attention to see that these inquiries are finalised as expeditiously as possible.
Consequently, in cases where Government servants are placed under suspension pending
inquiry, suspension continues for long periods. In most of the cases suspensions and
departmental inquiries extend over a period of years causing infructuous expenditure to
Government. With a view to minimise the delay in completing the departmental inquiries
it is considered necessary to review all such pending cases at regular levels. Accordingly
the following instructions are issued.
i) Heads of Departments are requested to collect on the first of every month a progress
report from each one of the suspending/disciplinary/appointing authorities in their
departments in the enclosed proforma. They should undertake a review of all these
progress reports and issue appropriate instructions to the concerned authority who has a
large number of pending disciplinary (including suspension) cases for finalising them.
ii) They should also consolidate the data received by them from the subordinate offices
and prepare one consolidated statement showing the number of cases pending in the
department as a whole and submit this consolidated statement to the concerned
administrative Secretariat Department by the 5th of the following month.
iii) The Secretaries to Government in the administrative department should add to the
statement so received from the Heads of Departments in accordance with item (ii) above,
the inquiry cases pending in the Secretariat Department and review all such cases and
issue appropriate instructions to the concerned Heads of Departments/Secretariat Officers
with whom the number of pending departmental inquiry (including suspension) cases is
very high by the 10th of the following month.
iv) Secretaries to Government should please forward to D.P.A.R (Service Rules) a
consolidated statement including therein the figures furnished by the Heads of
Departments and those belonging to the Secretariat Department on the 10th of the
following month.
4. The first report to be furnished in the matter should relate for the month of June
1983.
these instructions strictly. They are also requested to bring this position to the notice of all
the appointing authorities/disciplinary authorities/suspending authorities under their
administrative control.
sd/-
A.H. Someshwar
Reforms,
(Service Rules).
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ
¸ÀASÉå: r¦JDgï 41 J¸ïrE 83 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 16ŠCUÀ¸ïÖ 83.
C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¥ÀvÀæ
«µÀAiÀÄ: MAzÀÄ ªÀµÀðzÀ CªÀ¢üAiÉÆ¼ÀUÉ ¤ªÀøwÛ ºÉÆAzÀ°gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ
£ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼ÀÄŠEªÀÅUÀ¼À ²ÃWÀæ «¯ÉÃªÁjUÉ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ DyðPÀ ºÁ¤ vÀgÀÄªÀ D¥ÁzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¹, G½zÀ D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À §UÉÎ ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ºÀÆrgÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÊ©qÀÄªÀAvÉ C£ÉÃPÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ EwÛÃaUÉ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ
§gÀÄvÀÛ°ªÉ. EzÀPÉÌ PÁgÀt, EAvÀºÀ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀ¥ÀÅà ºÉÆj¸À®àlÖ ¸ÀPÁðj C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤ªÀøvÀÛgÁUÀÄªÀ
ªÉÆzÀ¯ÉÃ ªÀÄÄPÁÛAiÀÄUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀ¢zÀÄÝzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CAvÀºÀ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ¤ªÀøwÛ
ºÉÆA¢zÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À®Ä ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À°è CªÀPÁ±À«®èzÉÃ EzÀÄÝzÀÄ DVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ,
EAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è PÁ®«ÄwAiÉÆ¼ÀUÉ «µÀAiÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀAUÀæ»¹, CªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï «ªÀÄ²ð¹ ²ÃWÀæ PÀæªÀÄ
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîªÀÅzÀÄ CvÀåªÀ±ÀåPÀ.
2. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ¥Á®£Á ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ (r¹¦è£Àj CxÁjnÃ¸ï) EzÀPÉÌ ®UÀwÛ¹gÀÄªÀ
£ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉAiÀÄ°è MAzÀÄ ªÀiÁ¹PÀ «ªÀgÀuÉ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹ CzÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄA¢£À wAUÀ¼À 5£ÉÃ ¢£ÁAPÀzÀ
M¼ÀUÁV F PÉ¼ÀUÉ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹PÉÆqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
UÀÆæ¥ï '¹' ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÀÆæ¥ï 'r' ªÀUÀðPÉÌ E¯ÁSÁ
¸ÉÃjgÀÄªÀ £ËPÀgÀjUÉ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ªÀÄÄSÁå¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ
«ªÀgÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖ.
UÀÆæ¥ï '©' ªÀUÀðPÉÌ ¸ÉÃjgÀÄªÀ £ËPÀgÀjUÉ
¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ
«ªÀgÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖ. PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ½UÉ
E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄSÁå¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ vÁªÉÃ ¥ÁægÀA©ü¹gÀÄªÀ vÀ¤SÁ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß F ªÀiÁ¹PÀ «ªÀgÀuÁ
¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ°è ¸ÉÃj¹ CAxÀºÁ J¯Áè ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï «ªÀÄ²ð¹, E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß JzÀÄj¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ ¤ªÀøvÀÛgÁUÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ¯ÉÃ CªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ £ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ¸ÀÆPÀÛ PÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ DzÉÃ²¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
CAvÉAiÉÄÃ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ J¯Áè E¯ÁSÁ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ UÀÆæ¥ï 'J' ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÀÆæ¥ï '©'
C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ CAxÀºÀ J¯Áè E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀÆqÀ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï «ªÀÄ²ð¹,
£ËPÀgÀgÀÄ ¤ªÀøwÛ ºÉÆAzÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ¯ÉÃ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
4. E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄSÁå¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ F DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Àj¥Á®£Á ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ
vÀgÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
¸À»/Š
ªÉÄÊ.PÀø. ªÉAPÀmÉÃ±À£ï,
C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated the 14th November 1983
CIRCULAR
Sub:- Review of disciplinary cases which are pending finalisation-further instructions
regarding.
Ref:- 1) Circular No. GAD 131 OOM 66 Dt. 21/12/66.
2) O.M. No. GAD 28 MAR 72, dated 30/5/72.
3) Circular No. DPAR 21 SDE 83 dated 1.6.83.
Consequent on the prescription in the Circular cited at (3) above of monthly returns
to indicate the number of suspension/inquiry cases pending, the quarterly returns
prescribed in the Circular cited at (1) above may be discontinued. However, the special
Register prescribed in Annexure I to the Circular cited at (1) above should be continued to
be maintained.
2) The review of the quarterly return prescribed in the O.M cited at (2) above may now
be undertaken in respect of the monthly return prescribed in the Circular cited at (3)
above.
3) The Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are requested to bring this
position to the notice of all the Appointing Authorities/Disciplinary
Authorities/Suspending authorities under their administrative control.
sd/-
A.H. Someshwar
Reforms,
(Service Rules)
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated the 14th March 1984.
CIRCULAR
Sub:- Defending the cases/suits filed in Courts against Government-Instructions-reg.
Government have come across cases in which suits filed against Government
Departments were decided ex-parte on the ground that the Government Pleaders
authorised by Government to defend the suits did not appeal on the dates of hearing.
Another reason for such a situation is that the defendant Heads of Departments do not
pursue the suits/cases with Government Pleaders with proper care and ensure effective
defence.
Departmental Heads as defendants to suits are responsible to see that effective steps
are taken in time to defend the cases, giving no room for any laxity on their part in
pursuing the cases with Government counsels. Government, therefore direct that in
cases/suits filed against Government in Courts, the concerned Heads of Departments and
Officers should take necessary action to defend by providing timely assistance to the
defence counsels authorised by Government and pursue the cases till they are heard and
decided by the Courts.
The Secretaries to Government are requested to bring these instructions to the notice
of the Heads of Departments and all other concerned Officers/Officials. The Secretary,
Department of Law and Parly. Affairs in particular is requested to issue suitable
instructions to the District Government Pleaders.
sd/-
A.H. Someshwar
Department of Personnel & Admnv.
Reforms,
(Service Rules)
Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
No. DPAR 12 SDE 83, BANGALORE DATED THE 21st APRIL, 1984.
Sub:- Suspension of Government Servants and their promotions pending inquiries
In the O.M.No. GAD 21 SSR 65 dated 26-2-1965 certain guidelines were issued
indicating certain circumstances under which Government servants might be placed under
suspension, Government have further examined this matter and in modification of the
earlier instructions the following instructions are issued for the guidance of the
appointing/disciplinary authorities.
Circumstances under which Government servants may be placed under suspension:
(i) Where an accused Government servant if continued in service is likely to
temper with witnesses or documents, shifting him to another station or post
should first be considered. If it is still apprehended that he is likely to temper
with witnesses or documents, he should be placed under suspension.
(ii) When a Government servant is prosecuted for any offence committed in the
course of his duty and which involves moral turpitude;
(iii) Government servants caught red-handed while receiving illegal gratification;
(iv) In certain situations where continuance of Government servant in service
during investigation/inquiry is considered not desirable, the Government
servant may be given the option to proceed on leave. Alternatively, he may be
placed under suspension;
(v) When the Vigilance Commission recommends placing a Government servant
under suspension, the recommendation should be examined in the light of
points (i) to (iv) above and decision taken accordingly.
Period for which suspension should be continued pending investigation/inquiry
The period of suspension should be limited as indicated below:
(a) Where a Government servant is placed under suspension pending investigation,
if investigation is not completed within six months, he should be reinstated. In
such a case, if at the end of the investigation a Prima facie case is established
there would be no objection to suspend him again pending inquiry/trial.
(b) Where suspension is ordered or continued pending inquiry or trial, suspension
should be revoked if inquiry/trial is not commenced within three months or the
inquiry/trial even though commenced within 3 months, is not completed within
nine months from its commencement.
Promotion of Government Servants Against whom inquiries are pending.
In O.M. No. GAD (SI) 56 SSR 59 dated 9/10/59 as modified in O.M No. GAD 80
SSR 65 dated 11/4/66 it was clarified that unless a Government servant is placed under
suspension the mere fact that a departmental inquiry is pending against him, is no bar for
considering his case for promotion. In further amplification of these instructions
Government servant against whom inquiry is pending may be considered for promotion
without reference to the pending enquiries and if he is otherwise found to be eligible, he
should be promoted subject to the condition that the promotion would be reviewed at the
conclusion of the inquiry based on the findings in the inquiry.
The Secretaries to the Government and Heads of Department are requested to follow
these instructions and to bring them to the notice of all the appointing
authorities/disciplinary authorities/suspending authorities under their administrative
control.
sd/-
M.M. Naik
Reforms, (Service Rules)
¸ÀASÉå: r¦Jgï 33 J¸ïrE 83 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 24£ÉÃ ªÉÄÃ 1984.
«µÀAiÀÄ: PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ,
1957gÀ ¤ªÀøwÛ DUÀ°gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É EgÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°èzÁÝUÀ CªÀ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÆrzÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß CªÀ£ÀÄ
¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ ¤ªÀøwÛAiÀiÁzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼À 214 (J) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄPÉÌ
M¼À¥ÀlÖªÀÅUÀ¼À£Àß®èzÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ,
1957gÀ°ègÀÄªÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀj¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀPÉÌ CªÀPÁ±À«gÀÄªÀÅ¢®è. PÁgÀt F ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ CªÀjUÉ
C£Àé¬Ä¸ÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.
2. ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ¤ªÀøwÛAiÀiÁzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ CªÀ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÀÆqÀ¯ÁVzÀÝ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ
DyðPÀ ºÁ¤ GAmÁV®èªÉA§ PÁgÀtzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É »AzÀPÉÌ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀPÉÌ §gÀÄwÛªÉ.
3. EvÀåxÀðªÁUÀzÉÃ G½¢gÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇwðUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ºÁUÀÆ EAvÀºÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è DUÀÄªÀ «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ¤¸À®Ä MAzÀÄ ªÀiÁ¹PÀ «ªÀgÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹ C¢üPÀøvÀ
eÕÁ¥À£À ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå: r¦JDgï 41 J¸ïrE 83 ¢£ÁAPÀ 16Š8Š1983gÀ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÆqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
4. E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ F C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°ègÀÄªÀAvÉ
PÁ®PÁ®PÉÌ PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è EAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ GzÀã«¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæªÉÄÃAiÀÄªÀÅ MzÀV §gÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.
5. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 16Š8Š1983gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è ¸ÀÆa¹gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C£ÀÄ¸Àj¹
¤ªÀøwÛ DUÀÄªÀAvÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÀÆqÀ¯ÁVgÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß CªÀgÀÄ ¤ªÀøwÛ
DUÀÄªÀÅzÀPÉÌ ªÀÄÄAZÉ EvÀåxÀðªÀiÁqÀ®Ä PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜjUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ½UÉ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ. EAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÉ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ
§AzÀgÉ CzÀ£ÀÄß wÃªÀðªÁV ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¸À¯ÁUÀÄªÀÅzÉAzÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ w½¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
¸À»/Š
JA.JA. £ÁAiÀiïÌ
G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ,
(¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ)
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated, 21st June 1984
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Reinstatement of Government servants placed under suspension at the request
of the State Vigilance Commission.
Ref:- 1. Circular No. DPAR 71 PVC 78 dated 17-7-1979.
2. O.M. No. DPAR 12 SDE 83 dated 21-4-1984
Government reviewed the policy in respect of suspension of Government servants
and revocation of suspensions etc. and on such review, issued revised
instructions/guidelines (vide O.M. No. DPAR 12 SDE 83 dated 21-4-1984) indicating the
circumstances under which Government servants might be placed under suspension, the
time after which suspensions might be revoked, pending investigations/inquiries against
them.
These revised instructions or guidelines have also to be applied to the cases where
Government servants are placed under suspension at the instance of Karnataka State
Vigilance Commission and their reinstatement after revocation of the suspension. As a
result, it would be no more necessary to consult the Karnataka State Vigilance
Commission in the matter of revocation of suspensions of Government servants ordered at
the instance of the Commission as specified in the Circular No. DPAR 71 PVC 78, dated
17-7-1979 and hence, the said Circular is hereby rescinded.
sd/-
M.M. Naik
Reforms,
(Service Rules)
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated the 2nd Aug. 1984
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Departmental Inquiry under rule 11 of the K.C.S. (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules 1957-entrusting the cases to the Officers of Karnataka State
Ref:- O.M. No. DPAR 5 SSR 79 dated 8/7/81 and 17/8/81.
In O.M. No DPAR 5 SSR 79 dated 8/7/81 it was directed that in the departmental
inquiry cases initiated against Government servants at the level of Government and at the
level of Heads of Departments the Officers of Karnataka Vigilance Commission should be
appointed as Inquiry Officers. It was further clarified in the O.M dated 17/8/81 that only
cases instituted under rule 11 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules, 1957, should be referred to the Karnataka State Vigilance Commission and
not those initiated under rule 12 of these rules.
The Vigilance Commission has brought to the notice of Government that in a good
number of disciplinary cases initiated by the Heads of Departments under rule 11 of these
rules and entrusted to the officers of the Commission for conducting inquiry, the charges
are of simple nature requiring action under rule 12 of the rules and that cases are referred
to the Commission, mechanically by the Disciplinary authorities without examining the
nature of charges to decide whether a case calls for a major or minor punishment.
Rule 11 of the rules deals with the procedure to be followed by the disciplinary
authorities for imposing major penalties and rule 12 deals with that for imposing minor
penalties. It should not be difficult for the Disciplinary Authorities to understand and
decide whether a case on hand warrants a procedure for imposing major penalties or minor
penalties if they apply their mind to go through all the important facts and circumstances
of the case. Depending on the nature of charges and other circumstances the Disciplinary
Authorities should be able to decide whether the cases call for a major or minor
punishment. Only such cases as in the opinion of the Disciplinary Authority calling for
imposition of a major punishment should be initiated under rule 11 of the Classification,
Control and Appeal Rules and entrusted to the officers of the Vigilance Commission for
inquiry in accordance with the Official Memorandum referred to above.
Merely referring all types of cases mechanically to the Commission without proper
application of mind would not only cause a lot of inconvenience to the Government
servants involved in such inquiries but also burden the Commission with unnecessary
work.
It is therefore impressed on the Secretaries to Government and Heads of
Departments that they should assess the gravity of charge and come to a specific
conclusion whether it does requires imposition of a major penalty if the charge is proved
and refer only such a case to the officers of the Commission.
sd/-
M.M. Naik
Reforms,
(Service Rules)
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated the 27th Nov. 1984.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Joint Inquiry against Govt. servants under Rule 13 of the Karnataka Civil
Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957.
According to the provisions contained under Rule 13 (1) of the Karnataka Civil
Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957, where two or more
Government servants are concerned in any case, the Government or any other authority
competent to impose the penalty of dismissal from service on all such Government
servants may make an order directing that disciplinary action against all of them may be
taken in a common proceedings.
2. Whenever an order for holding a Joint Inquiry under the said rule is passed, such
order should also specify-
i) The authority which may function as the Disciplinary Authority for the purpose
of such common proceedings;
ii) The procedure to be followed; and
iii) The penalties specified in Rule 8 of the said rules which such disciplinary
authority shall be competent to impose.
3. A case has come to the notice of Government where a Joint Inquiry was ordered but
the penalties which the Disciplinary Authority is competent to impose and the penalties in
respect of which it has to refer the case to higher authorities are not mentioned. A
defective order of the above kind may vitiate the entire further proceedings.
mind the requirement of the rules as explained above while passing orders to hold Joint
Inquiries under Rule 13 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules, 1957. They are also requested to bring this to the notice of all the
appointing authorities and other officers under their administrative control who are
empowered to make orders under rule 13 of the Classification, Control and Appeal Rules.
sd/-
M.M. Naik
Reforms,
(Service Rules)
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated the 14th Feb. 1985
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub:- Review of disciplinary cases which are pending finalisation-prescription of
quarterly progress report.
Ref:- 1. Circular DPAR 24 SDE 83 dated 1.6.1983
2. O.M. No. DPAR 12 SDE 83 dated 21/4/1984.
In Circular dated 1/6/83 referred to above a preforma has been prescribed to furnish
information every month about disciplinary cases which are pending finalisation.
Instructions were also issued for reviewing all such cases regularly.
2) In the O.M. dated 21st April 84, guidelines have been provided for revoking
suspension of Government servants who are placed under suspension pending
enquiry/trial. According to these guidelines where a Government servant is placed under
suspension pending investigation and if investigation is not completed within six months
he should be reinstated. It has also been made clear therein that where suspension is
ordered or continued, pending inquiry or trial, the suspension should be revoked if the
inquiry/trial is not commenced within three months or the inquiry/trial even though
commenced within three months is not completed within nine months from its
commencement.
3) The matter regarding submission of monthly reports prescribed in the Circular dated
1.6.83 has been reviewed further, taking into account what is stated in para 2 above and it
is considered that quarterly reports should be prescribed instead of monthly reports
prescribed in the Circular dated 1/6.1983. Accordingly, in supersession of the instructions
issued in Circular dated 1.6.83 the following instructions are issued.
i) Heads of Departments may collect a progress reports in the proforma attached to
this O.M. from disciplinary authorities and undertake a review of these cases in
the light of the instructions contained in O.M dated 21/4/84. Appropriate
instructions to the concerned authorities may be issued for finalising the pending
cases expeditiously.
ii) A statement for the entire department may be prepared in the same proforma and
submitted to the concerned administrative Secretariat Department by the 10th of
the month following the quarter for which the statement is prepared.
iii) The Secretaries to Government in the administrative department may have a
consolidated statement prepared in the same proforma, including-
a) the details received from the Heads of Departments under their administrative
control ; and
b) the cases pending at Secretariat level.
They may also issue appropriate instructions to the concerned Heads of
Departments/Secretariat Officers with whom the number of pending
departmental inquiry (including suspension cases) is very high. The statement
may thereafter sent to the Additional Chief Secretary so as to reach him by the
20th day of the month following the quarter.
4) The first such report to be furnished in the matter should be for the quarter ending on
31st March 1985.
sd/-
M.M. Naik
Joint Secretary to
Government,
Department of Personnel &
Admnv. Reforms,
(Service Rules)
Statement of inquiry Cases/trial cases including suspension) cases pending in the

Department of the .................................. for the quarter ending .............................
Part-I Suspension cases
No of Govt. No. of No of Break up of col.5

Servants Govt. suspended
under servants Total Govt. Balance
suspension placed servant Over 3 Over 6 Over 9
at the end of under reinstated months months months
previous suspension in
quarter during the service
quarter during
the quarter
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Part-II Inquiry cases

No of D.E No. D.E. Tota No of cases Balanc Break up of col. 5
Cases/ Cases/ l finalised e Over 3 Over 6 Over 9
prosecution prosecution and month month month
cases cases orders s s s
pending at the instituted issued
end during during the
of the the quarter quarter
previous
quarter
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Note Below : For purposes of this statement D.E. casess means cases in which articles of
charges have been served on Govt. Servants or a notice under rule 12 of
CCA Rule has been issued to Government servant and prosecution cases
means cases in which charge sheet has been filed in Court.
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated the 4th March 1985
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub: Suspension of Govt. servants and their promotions pending inquiries-
Instructions regarding.
The para relating to period for which suspension should be continued pending
investigation/inquiry, in the O.M. No. DPAR 12 SDE 83 dated 21st April 1984, shall be
substituted by the following:
The period of suspension should be limited as indicated below:-
(a) Where a Government servant is placed under suspension before the
commencement of investigation into the allegations against him, he should be
reinstated in service if the investigation is not completed within 6 months from
the date of suspension. In such a case, if at the end of investigation a prima
facie case is established, there is no objection to suspend him again before
commencement of inquiry/trial.
(b) Where a Government servant is placed under suspension when the
investigation is in progress, or at any time between conclusion of the
investigation and commencement of inquiry/trial he should be reinstated in
service if the inquiry/trial is not commenced within three months from the date
of suspension;
(c) Where a Government servant is placed under suspension when the
investigation/inquiry/trial is in progress or at any time between conclusion of
the investigation and commencement of inquiry/trial, the period of his
suspension should not extend beyond nine months from the date of
commencement of the inquiry/trial or from the date of suspension whichever is
later;
(d) The periods laid down in (a), (b) and (c) above for continuing a Government
servant under suspension are only outer limits and do not prevent the
appropriate authorities from reinstating the Government servant earlier if
circumstances of the case warrant. Where a Government servant has been
suspended by any authority other than the Government, the provisions of sub-
rule (6) of rule 10 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules, 1957 should be complied with.
sd/-
M.M. Naik
Reforms,
(Service Rules)
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, Dated 3rd July 1985
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub: Suspension of Government Servants and their reinstatement.
Ref: 1) O.M. No: DPAR 12 SDE 83 dated: 21-4-1984.
2) O.M. No. DPAR 12 SDE 83 dated 04-03-1985.
In the official memoranda referred to above, certain guidelines were issued
indicating circumstances under which Government Servants might be placed under
suspension and the period for which suspension should be continued pending
investigation/inquiry. Government have further examined this matter and in supersession
of the earlier instructions, the following instructions are issued for the guidance of the
appointing/disciplinary authorities.
2. Circumstances under which Government servants may be placed under
suspension:
i) Where continuance in office of the Government Servant will prejudice the
investigation, trial or any inquiry (i.e. apprehended tampering with witnessess or
documents)
ii) Where continuance in office of the Government Servants is likely to seriously
subvert discipline in the office in which the Government Servant is working.
iii) Where the Government Servant is prosecuted for any offence committed in the
course of his duty involving moral turpitude.
iv) Corruption embezzlement or misappropriation of Government money or money
of a foreign employer under whom the Government Servant has worked on
deputation or otherwise, possession of disproportionate assets, misuse of official
powers for personal gain.
v) serious negligence and dereliction of duty resulting in considerable loss to
Government and to the foreign employer while the Government Servant had
worked on deputation.
vi) return to duty after unauthorised absence.
vii) refusal, or deliberate failure to carry out written orders of superior officers.
3. Period of suspension: Rule 10 of the CCA Rules provides for placing a
Government Servant under suspension where disciplinary proceedings are contemplated or
are pending or where a case in respect of any criminal offence is under investigation or
trial. It is thus permissible to place Govt. Servants under suspension even before the
commencement of investigation into the allegations against him. Taking into account the
above position, it is hereby directed that Govt. Servants placed under suspension should be
reinstated in service if the stages of investigation or inquiry trial following the date of
suspension are not adhered to according to the schedule below, namely, where-
a) the investigation or inquiry/trial into the allegations against Govt. Servants have
not commenced within three months from the date of suspension;
b) the investigation into the allegations against Govt. Servants is not completed
within six months from the date of commencement of the investigation;
c) the inquiry/trial has not commenced within three months on conclusion of the
investigation;
d) the inquiry/trial has not concluded within twelve months from the date of
commencement of the inquiry/trial or from the date of suspension whichever is
later.
The period laid down for continuing a Govt. Servant under suspension is only outer
limit and do not prevent the appropriate authorities from reinstating the Govt. Servant
earlier if circumstances of the case warrant. Where a Govt. Servant has been suspended
by any authority other than the Govt., the provisions of sub-rule (6) of rule 10 of the
Karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1957 should be complied with.
4. Where any department, having regard to the gravity of the allegation and the
complexity of the case in respect of the following types of cases is of the view that the
time schedule laid down in the preceeding para cannot be adhered to and further
continuance of the suspension of Govt. Servants is justified, such cases may be examined
on their own merit and decision taken by the Minister concerned whether to continue
suspension;
i) Moral turpitude;
ii) Corruption (including trap cases, embezzlement or misappropriation of money of
Govt. or a foreign employer, possession of disproportionate assets and misuse of
official power for personal gain);
(iii)Refusal or deliberate failure to carry out Written orders of superior officers
5. Promotion on during inquiry:- In O.M No: GAD (SI) 56 SSR 59 dated: 09-10-
1959 as modified in O.M NO: GAD 80 SSR 65 dated: 11-04-1966, it was clarified that
unless a Govt. Servant is placed under suspension, the mere fact that a departmental
inquiry is pending against him, is no bar for considering his case for promotion. In further
amplification of these instructions, a Govt. Servant against whom inquiry is pending may
be considered for promotion without reference to the pending enquiries and if he is
otherwise found to be eligible, he should be promoted subject to the condition that the
promotion would be reviewed at the conclusion of the inquiry based on the findings in the
inquiry.
these instructions and to bring them to the notice of all the appointing
authorities/disciplinary authorities/suspending authorities under their administrative
control.
sd/-
M.M. Naik
Reforms,
(Service Rules)
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, Dated 5th July 1985
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub: Withholding of special increments such as stagnation increment or increment
for passing departmental examinations as a measure of penalty under Rule 8 of
the Karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1957 - Clarification regarding.
Under rule 8 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal)
Rules, 1957 "withholding of increments" is one of the penalties which may be imposed on
a Government Servant for good and sufficient reasons.
2. Whether the increments referred to in the aforesaid rules shall also include
increments such as stagnation increments and additional increments for passing
departmental examinations granted to Government Servants, has been examined.
3. It is hereby clarified that taking the structure of increment as a whole, the increment
referred to in rule 8 of the said rules refers to normal increments in time-scale of any posts
and does not include special increments such as stagnation increment or increment for
passing departmental examinations. Hence the increment other than the normal increment
cannot be withheld as a measure of penalty under the Karnataka Civil Services
(Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957. In cases where the penalty of
withholding of increments cannot be imposed as a measure of penalty on a Government
Servant for the reason that he has already reached the maximum of the pay scale, the
disciplinary authority may consider the question of imposing any other minor penalties
including the reduction to a lower stage in a time-scale of pay.
4. The Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are requested to bring
these instructions to the notice of all the appointing authorities and other disciplinary
authorities under their administrative control for guidance.
sd/-
M.M. Naik
Joint Secretary to Government
Department and Personnel and Admnv. Reforms
(Service Rules)
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 22£ÉÃ ªÉÄÃ 1986.
«µÀAiÀÄ: E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉŠ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ
¹§âA¢AiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR: 1) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå r¦JDgï 5 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 79 ¢£ÁAPÀ 8.7.81 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 17.8.81.
2) C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå r¦JDgï 5 J¸ïrE 86 ¢£ÁAPÀ 7.5.86.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ¯ÁèUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ¯ÁèUÀ°Ã AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÀÆrzÀgÉ, CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀ eÁUÀøvÀ
DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸À§ºÀÄzÉAzÀÄ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 8.7.81 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
17.8.81gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVvÀÄÛ.
2. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 1984 CrAiÀÄ°è ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀ£ÀÄß
gÀa¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀjAzÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ eÁUÀøvÀ DAiÉÆÃUÀªÀÅ C¹ÛvÀéªÀ£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÉzÀÄPÉÆArvÀÄ. F PÁgÀt¢AzÁV PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11PÉÌ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå r¦JDgï 5 J¸ïrE 86 ¢£ÁAPÀ 7.5.86gÀ°è wzÀÄÝ¥ÀrAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. F
wzÀÄÝ¥ÀrAiÀÄÄ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¹§âA¢AiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ
C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸À®Ä CªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÀ°à¹zÉ. ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ
G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ªÀiÁvÀæ EgÀÄªÀÅzÀjAzÀ
¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ/£ÉÃªÀÄPÁ¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ
(ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼À ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
ºÀÆqÀÄvÀÛzÉAiÉÆÃ CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ªÀiÁvÀæ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛªÀ£ÀÄß
£ÉÃ«Ä¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ. AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ
G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÁÛzÀAvÀºÀ GZÀÑ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ¬Ä®èªÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ
ªÀÄ£ÀUÀAqÀgÉ CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ ¹§âA¢AiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ
C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ £ÉÃ«Ä¸À®Ä CªÀPÁ±À«zÉ.
3. AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
ºÀÆqÀÄvÁÛgÉAiÉÆÃ CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ ¹§âA¢ ªÀUÀðzÀ°è PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
ªÀiÁvÀæ «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. »ÃUÉ £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÁUÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ jf¸ÁÖçgï ªÀÄÄSÁAvÀgÀ
¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ ¥ÀÇªÁð£ÀÄªÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
4. F «ZÁgÀzÀ°è J¯Áè ¥ÀvÀæ ªÀåªÀºÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ jf¸ÁÖçgï ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄŠ2, qÁ.
CA¨ÉÃqÀÌgï «Ã¢, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, EªÀgÉÆA¢UÉ £ÀqÉ¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
5. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ PÁAiÀÄð«zsÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß
E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÉ C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. F »AzÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ eÁUÀøvÀ DAiÉÆÃUÀPÉÌ ¸À°è¹gÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¥ÀÅ£Àgï
¥Àj²Ã°¹ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ PÁAiÀÄð¤ÃwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C£ÀÄ¸Àj¹, ºÉÆ¸À «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÉÃ«Ä¸À®Ä
vÀPÀët PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
6. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ F C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°ègÀÄªÀ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß/PÁAiÀÄð¤ÃwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀªÀÄä C¢üÃ£ÀzÀ°ègÀÄªÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
ªÀåªÀºÀj¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆ§â C¢üPÁj/£ËPÀgÀ£À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀvÀPÀÄÌzÀÄÝ.
¸À»/Š
¦. Dgï. £ÁAiÀÄPï
¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð.
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 5£ÉÃ dÆ£ï 1986.
«µÀAiÀÄ: E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ°è ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À «µÀAiÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ CxÀªÁ zÀÄªÀðvÀð£ÉAiÀÄ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹ MzÀV¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
PÉ®ªÀÅ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ, ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁvÀæ
DzsÁgÀªÁV ElÄÖPÉÆAqÀÄ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À «µÀAiÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ CxÀªÁ
zÀÄªÀðvÀ£É DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ MzÀV¹gÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ«
vÀ¤SÉ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß zÀ¸ÁÛªÉÃdÄ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ°è ¸ÉÃj¹ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À «µÀAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¸Á©ÃvÀÄ¥Àr¸À®Ä F
ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß CªÀ®A©¹gÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÉ. ¥ÀÇªÀð¨Á« ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄÄ
C£Ë¥ÀZÁjPÀ ¸Àé¨sÁªÀªÁVzÀÄÝ D ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ
PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉÃ CxÀªÁ ¨ÉÃqÀªÉÃ JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß ¤zsÀðj¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀPÉÌ ªÀiÁvÀæ UÀt£ÉUÉ
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉAiÉÄA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ vÀgÀ¯ÁVzÉ. AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ
¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄÄ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß zÉÆÃµÀ «ªÀÄÄPÀÛ£À£ÁßV ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¸ÀªÀÅzÀPÁÌUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ
²PÉë «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀPÁÌUÀ°Ã CªÀPÁ±À ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅ¢®è. DzÀgÉ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ªÀÄÄAzÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ PÀæªÀÄ
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî§ºÀÄzÉÃ JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß wÃªÀiÁð¤¸À®Ä CªÀPÁ±À ªÀiÁrPÉÆqÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄÄ D
vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ «ªÉÃZÀ£ÉUÉ M¼À¥ÀnÖgÀÄvÀÛzÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CAvÀºÀ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀA«zsÁ£ÀzÀ
C£ÀÄZÉÑÃzÀ 311 (2) gÀ°ègÀÄªÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¥Àj¥Á°¸ÀÄªÀÅ¢®è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ¸ÁQëUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¥ÁnÃ¸ÀªÁ®Ä ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀPÁÌUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ CªÀ£À ¥ÀæwªÁzÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀPÉÌ CªÀPÁ±À«gÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.
D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ°è MqÀUÉÆr¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄªÉÃ¤gÀÄªÀÅ¢®è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
¸ÁªÀiÁ£ÀåªÁV ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ £ËPÀgÀgÀ JzÀÄjUÉ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.
DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ D¥ÁzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆj¹
CAvÀºÀ D¥ÁzÀ£É ¥ÀnÖ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DgÉÆÃ¥À «µÀAiÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÀÄyð¸À®Ä ¥Àæ¸ÁÛ¥À«gÀÄªÀAvÀºÀ zÀ¸ÁÛªÉÃdÄ ¥ÀnÖ
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÁQëUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É ªÀiÁvÀæ vÀAiÀiÁj¹ MzÀV¸À¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
D¥ÁzÀ£É ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ£À ¥Àj²Ã®£ÉUÉ CªÀ±Àå©zÀÝ°è
MzÀV¸À¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ D¥ÁzÀ£É ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
vÀAiÀiÁj¸ÀÄªÀÅzÁUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ F ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß D¥ÁzÀ£É ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸ÀÄªÀÅzÁUÀ°Ã ªÀiÁqÀPÀÆqÀzÀÄ
ºÁUÀÆ D¥ÁzÀ£Á ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DzsÀj¹ ªÀiÁvÀæ vÀAiÀiÁj¹ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ
MzÀV¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ°£À ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀªÀÄä C¢üÃ£ÀzÀ°è
PÁAiÀÄð ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄªÀ J¯Áè £ÉÃªÀÄPÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ/²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
¸À»/Š
JA. JA. £ÁAiÀiïÌ
¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ ¸ÀºÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 1£ÉÃ dÄ¯ÉÊ 1986.
«µÀAiÀÄ: E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ°è ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀjAiÀiÁV
C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¢gÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR: 1) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå :fJr 3 ¹JDgï 57, ¢£ÁAPÀ 14Š12Š1957.
2) ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: fJr 35 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 58, ¢£ÁAPÀ 8Š1Š59.
3) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå:fJr (J¸ïŠ1) 33 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 61, ¢£ÁAPÀ 27Š6Š1962
4) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: fJr 26 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 72, ¢£ÁAPÀ 23Š6Š72.
5) ¸ÀPÁðj C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå:fJr 2 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 72, ¢£ÁAPÀ 12Š2Š1973.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½, 1957£ÀÄß
¢£ÁAPÀ 10Š12Š1957 gÀAzÀÄ ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
£ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ°è C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß «ªÀgÀªÁV ¸ÀÆa¹, ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃR (1)gÀ°è PÁtÂ¹gÀÄªÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ
14Š12Š1957gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVvÀÄÛ. vÀzÀ£ÀAvÀgÀ, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ E¯ÁSÁ
vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ F §UÉÎ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ
ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀÄªÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ: ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀjAiÀiÁV UÀªÀÄ¤¸ÀzÉÃ EgÀÄªÀAvÀºÀ C£ÉÃPÀ jÃwAiÀÄ
¸ÁªÀiÁ£ÀåªÁV PÀAqÀÄ§gÀÄªÀAvÀºÀ £ÀÆå£ÀvÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÀÝªÀÅ. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ, E¯ÁSÁ
vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ C£ÀAvÀgÀ ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À°è ¸ÁªÀiÁ£ÀåªÁV PÀAqÀÄ§gÀÄªÀAvÀºÀ
£ÀÆå£ÀvÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸ÀÄvÁÛ, J¯Áè ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ®Æè E¯ÁSÁ
vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉÊUÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÁUÀ ¸ÀjAiÀiÁV UÀªÀÄ£À ºÀj¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ F §UÉÎ ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀÄªÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA¥ÀÇtðªÁV CzsÀåAiÀÄ£À ªÀiÁrPÉÆAqÀÄ, vÀzÀ£ÀAvÀgÀ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
£ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÁUÀ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ZÁZÀÆ vÀ¥ÀàzÉ ¥Á°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVvÀÄÛ. F
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À°è, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ°è, «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV°Ã CxÀªÁ
²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÁUÀ°Ã CªÀgÀ ¸ÀéAvÀ £ÀÆå£ÀvÉ¬ÄAzÀ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀjAiÀÄÁV
C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸ÀzÉÃ EzÀÝ°è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ°è C®PÀë åvÉ vÉÆÃj¹zÀÝ°è, CAvÀºÀ «µÀAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß
¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ wÃPÀë ÚªÁV ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EzÀPÉÌ PÁgÀtgÁzÀ C¢üPÁj: ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÉÃ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï
¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½, 1957gÀrAiÀÄ°è ºÉÆuÉAiÀiÁUÀÄªÀgÀÄ
JA§ÄzÁV PÀÆqÀ w½¸À¯ÁVvÀÄÛ. C®èzÉ, F jÃwAiÀÄ C®PÀê åvÉ¬ÄAzÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ K£ÁzÀgÀÆ DyðPÀªÁV
£ÀµÀÖ GAmÁzÀ°è CzÀPÉÌ PÁgÀtgÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀ: ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÉÃ ¨sÀj¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÉÝAzÀÄ ¸ÀºÀ ºÉÃ¼À¯ÁVvÀÄÛ.
ªÉÄÃ¯ÁÌtÂ¹zÀ G¯ÉèÃR (5) gÀ°ègÀÄªÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt,
¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11PÉÌ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀÄÝ, ¸ÀzÀj
¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÉ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11(J) JA§ MAzÀÄ ºÉÆ¸À ¤AiÀÄªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß PÀÆqÀ ¸ÉÃj¸À¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ. EªÀÅUÀ¼À°è
E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁj ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÀAvÀ ºÀAvÀªÁV
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11 gÀrAiÀÄ°è D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ
zÉÆqÀØ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ ²PÉëAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ «zsÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀºÀ
UÉÆvÀÄÛ¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ
E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ §UÉÎ FUÁUÀ¯ÉÃ ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÃ½gÀÄªÀAvÉ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¹ J¯Áè jÃwAiÀÄ PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆArzÀÝgÀÆ, EwÛÃaUÉ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §AzÀ
MAzÀÄ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃPÀ£À CfðAiÀÄ°è, D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ ²¸ÀÄÛ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ¢AzÀ £ÉÃªÀÄPÀUÉÆAqÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ, D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ vÀ£Àß ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¸ÀÄÛ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ºÉÆj¹gÀÄªÀ D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀªÀÄyð¸ÀÄªÀ ºÉÃ½PÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß °TvÀ gÀÆ¥ÀzÀ°è
ªÀÄAr¸À°®èªÁzÀÄzÀjAzÀ DvÀ£À ªÉÄÃ°£À D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤dªÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀªÀÄyð¹zÀAvÉ w½zÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ
vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄV¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¹zÉAiÉÄÃ CxÀªÁ
E®èªÉÃ JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ¥Àj²Ã°¸ÀzÉAiÉÄÃ «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É
D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ zÉÆqÀØ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ ²PÀëAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¹gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. C®èzÉ, F £ÀÆå£ÀvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C¦Ã®Ä
«ZÁj¸ÀÄªÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ PÀÆqÀ UÀªÀÄ¤¸ÀzÉ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ¸À°è¹gÀÄªÀ C¦Ã®Ä ªÀÄ£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß wgÀ¸ÀÌj¹zÉ.
C¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ vÀ£Àß ºÉÃ½PÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß °TvÀ gÀÆ¥ÀzÀ°è ¤Ãr®èªÉA§ PÁgÀt¢AzÀ F E¯ÁSÁ
vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ§zÀÞªÁV ºÀÆqÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CzÀjAzÀ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÀÄgÀÄºÉÃ½PÉUÉ MAzÀÄ
CªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ «µÀAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß PÉÊ©qÀ®Ä ¸ÁzÀå«®è. D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ vÀ¤SÉUÉ ºÁdgÁUÀ¢zÀÝ
¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è KPÀ¥ÀQëÃAiÀÄªÁzÀ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÀÆqÀ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. EzÀgÀ°è ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ PÉÊUÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀAvÉ ºÉÆj¹gÀÄªÀ
D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄA¢qÀ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F C¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÀÄyð¸ÀÄªÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÁQëUÀ¼À DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ¥ÀgÀªÁV, «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
PÉÆ£ÉUÉÆ½¸ÀÄ§ºÀÄzÀÄ.
J¯Áè «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÉÄÃ°£À
CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ£ÀzÀ°èqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. EzÀ®èzÉ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÁUÀ UÉÆvÀÄÛ¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ
«zsÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. EzÀ£ÀÄß ¥Á°¸ÀÄªÀ°è ¤®ðPÀë å vÉÆÃj¹zÀ°è CxÀªÁ vÀ¦àzÀ°è
CAvÀºÀ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß wÃPÀë ÚªÁV ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¸À¯ÁUÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ F §UÉÎ FUÁUÀ¯ÉÃ ¤ÃrgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀAvÉ,
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½, 1957 gÀrAiÀÄ°è ²¹Û£À
PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¯ÁUÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¤ÃrgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß,
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸À®àqÀÄªÀªÀgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
DAiÀiÁAiÀiÁ ªÀÊAzÀzÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À°è PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀjUÉ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À,
£ÉÃªÀÄPÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ºÁUÀÆ C¦Ã®Ä ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
¸À»/Š
¦.Dgï. £ÁAiÀÄPï
¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 30£ÉÃ r¸ÉA§gï 1986.
C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À
«µÀAiÀÄ: ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¥ÀÇªÀð¨Á« vÀ¤SÉ: E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§
¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ¯ÉPÀÌ¥ÀvÀæ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄì «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
G¯ÉèÃR: 1) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå fJr 3 ¹JDgï 57, ¢£ÁAPÀ 14.12.57.
2) C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå. fJr 28 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 69, ¢£ÁAPÀ 12.12.73.
3) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå. r¦JDgï 5 J¸ïrE 79, ¢£ÁAPÀ 8.7.81.
4) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå. r¦Jgï 43 J¸ïrE 85, ¢£ÁAPÀ 14.2.85.
5) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå. r¦DJgï 13 J¸ïrE 85, ¢£ÁAPÀ 3.7.85.
6) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå. r¦DJgï 12 J¸ïrE 86, ¢£ÁAPÀ 22.5.86.
7) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå. r¦JDgï 15 J¸ïrE 85, ¢£ÁAPÀ 1.7.86.
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ««zsÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À°è ºÀt zÀÄgÀÄ¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¥À«¤AiÉÆÃUÀPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹AvÉ ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ºÀÆrgÀÄªÀ ¥ÀÇªÀð¨Á« vÀ¤SÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀµÀðUÀlÖ¯ÉÃ «¯ÉÃ DUÀzÉÃ
EgÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ §UÉÎ «zsÁ£À ªÀÄAqÀ®zÀ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ¯ÉPÀÌ¥ÀvÀæ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄÄ vÀ£Àß 1982Š83 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 1983Š84gÀ 14£ÉÃ
ªÀgÀ¢UÀ¼À wÃªÀæ DvÀAPÀ ªÀåPÀÛ¥Àr¹zÉ. ¢£ÁAPÀ 30.8.84gÀAzÀÄ EAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ 304 EzÀÝªÉAzÀÄ
w½zÀÄ§A¢zÉ. MAzÀÄ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀ ¨sÁUÀªÁVzÀÝ RjÃ¢AiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è
¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ JgÀqÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀ jÃw ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ wÃªÀæ ÇÀªÀiÁzsÁ£ÀPÉÌqÉ
ªÀiÁrPÉÆnÖzÉ. ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸ÀÄªÀ
§UÉÎ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ, E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
£ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß w½zÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÁzÀ §UÉÎ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄÄ PÉ®ªÀÅ ²¥sÁgÀ¸Àì£ÀÄß ªÀiÁrzÉ.
¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉ: E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀæUÀwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÁ® PÁ®PÉÌ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
¸À«ÄwAiÀÄÄ F «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è ªÀiÁrgÀÄªÀ ²¥sÁgÀ¸À£ÀÄß ®UÀwÛ¹gÀÄªÀ C£ÀÄ§AzsÀzÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉ: E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ: ªÀiÁUÀðzÀ±Àð£À
E®èªÉAzÀÄ ºÉÃ¼ÀÄªÀÅzÀPÉÌ §gÀÄªÀÅ¢®è CxÀªÁ EgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ: ªÀiÁUÀðzÀ±Àð£ÀªÀÅ ¸Á®zÉAzÀÄ
ºÉÃ¼À¯ÁUÀzÀÄ. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ,
1957£ÀÄß ¢£ÁAPÀ 10.12.57gÀAzÀÄ ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVzÉ. ºÁUÀÆ EzÉÃ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è F ¤ªÀÄAiÀÄUÀ¼À CrAiÀÄ°è
PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÆa¹ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå fJr 6 ¹JDgï 57,
¢£ÁAPÀ 14.12.1957£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVzÉ. F ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ PÀAqÀÄ
§AzÁUÀ¯É¯Áè ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Á°¸ÀÄªÀ «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è PÀAqÀÄ§AzÀ ¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå zÉÆÃµÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß CxÀªÁ PÉÊvÀ¦à
ºÉÆÃUÀÄªÀ «µÀAiÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß JwÛ vÉÆÃj¹ EªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è DVAzÁUÉÎ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁUÀÄwÛzÉ. D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ ¸ÀºÀd £ÁåAiÀÄ vÉÆÃj¸ÀÄªÀ°è CxÀªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À°è
¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Á°¸ÀzÉÃ EgÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è CxÀªÁ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ ¸ÀzÀªÀPÁ±À
MzÀV¸ÀÄªÀ «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è DVgÀÄªÀ ¯ÉÆÃ¥ÀzÉÆÃµÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß JwÛ »rzÀÄ £ÁåAiÀÄÁ®AiÀÄ DUÁUÀ ¤ÃrgÀÄªÀ
wÃ¥Àð£ÀÄß J¯Áè ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ DVAzÁUÉÎ vÀgÀ¯ÁUÀÄwÛzÉ.
3. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957PÉÌ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå fJr 28 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 60 ¢£ÁAPÀ 12.12.1973gÀ°è ¸ÀªÀÄUÀæ wzÀÄÝ¥ÀrAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
vÀgÀ¯ÁVzÉ. ªÀÄºÁ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸À®Ä C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÆa¹gÀÄªÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11PÀÆÌ ¸ÀºÀ
w¢Ý¥ÀrAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁr ºÀAvÀ ºÀAvÀªÁV PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è ¸Àà¶ÖPÀj¸À¯ÁVzÉ. PÉ®ªÀÅ ºÀAvÀUÀ¼À°è
D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ ¤ÃqÀ¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÁ¯ÁªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀºÀ ¤UÀ¢ü¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
4. F J¯Áè ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß EwÛÃZÉUÉ ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁzÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå r¦JDgï 15 J¸ïrE 85
¢£ÁAPÀ 1.7.1986gÀ°è ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÀÄZÀÑj¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
5. ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ µÀÄgÀÄ ªÀiÁrzÀ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ§zÀÞªÁV ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß CjwgÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä C£ÀÄPÀÆ®ªÁUÀ®Ä C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå.
r¦JDgï 5 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 79 ¢£ÁAPÀ 8.7.81gÀ°è ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ ºÀAvÀUÀ¼À°è ºÀÆqÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À°è ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
«ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ºÁPÀ¯ÁVzÉ. F ¤AiÀÄªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ
¥ÀÇªÀð¨Á« vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¹zÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 14ŠJ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ CzÉÃ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
£ÀqÉ¸À®Ä DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¹ , ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVzÉ. F ¤AiÀÄªÀÄªÀÅ E£ÀÆß
eÁjAiÀÄ°èzÉ. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå. r¦JDgï 12 J¸ïrE 86 ¢£ÁAPÀ 22.5.1986gÀ°è ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¹zÀ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀ CxÀªÁ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ CA¹Û£À°è ºÀÆrzÀ
E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä ªÀ»¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ.
6. ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ CªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ²¸ÀÄÛ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ¥ÀjµÀÌj¸À®Ä ºÉZÀÄÑ PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±À vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ¬ÄgÀÄªÀÅ¢®è . PÁgÀtªÉAzÀgÉ
«ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ £ÀqÉ¹gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ EAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è DzÀµÀÄÖ eÁUÀævÉ
CAwªÀÄ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ. «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß M¦àPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ §UÉÎ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ: G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ EªÀgÀ ²¥sÁgÀ¸Àì£ÀÄß M¦àPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß
C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå. r¦Jgï 96 PÉJ¯ïAiÀÄÄ 81, ¢£ÁAPÀ 29.10.81gÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß JzÀj¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ AiÀiÁªÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉ £ÀqÉAiÀÄÄªÁUÀ JµÀÄÖ CªÀ¢üUÉ
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉAiÀÄÄªÁUÀ JµÀÄÖ CªÀ¢üUÉ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è
ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀj¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ AiÀiÁªÁUÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß gÀzÀÄÝUÉÆ½¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À
¸ÀASÉå: r¦JDgï 13 J¸ïrE 85, ¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š7Š1985gÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸À¯ÁVzÉ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ°è F
J¯Áè ºÀAvÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß (CAzÀgÉ ¥ÀÇªÀð¨Á« vÀ¤SÉ:E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ CAwªÀÄ DzÉÃ±À) ºÉZÉÑAzÀgÉ 1
ªÀµÀðzÀ°è CxÀªÁ QèµÀÖ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è 15 wAUÀ¼À°è ¥ÀÇgÉÊ¸À¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
7. E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À «¯ÉÃªÁj §UÉÎ UÀªÀÄ£À«nÖgÀ®Ä ¤AiÀÄvÀPÁ°PÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß DVAzÁUÉÎ
¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ. FUÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå. r¦JDgï 43 J¸ïrE 84 ¢£ÁAPÀ 14.2.85gÀ°è
vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ. CzÀgÀAvÉ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ: CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ
vÀªÀÄä G£ÀßvÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À §UÉÎ
vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¸À¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°ègÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆ§â
E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ E¯ÁSÁ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ C¢üPÁjUÀ½AzÀ vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ CªÀ¢ü ªÀÄÄVzÀ vÀPÀët vÀj¹PÉÆAqÀÄ «¯ÉÃªÁj DUÀzÉ G½¢gÀÄªÀ
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À: E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÁ ºÉaÑUÉ EgÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ²ÃWÀæ
«¯ÉÃªÁjUÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀAvÉ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
8. ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÃ½gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ: ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆa ªÀÄvÀÄÛ vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß CvÀåAvÀ ¤µÉ×¬ÄAzÀ
¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥Á°¹zÀ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À°è «¼ÀA§ªÁUÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæªÉÄÃAiÀÄªÉÃ
GzÀã«¸ÀÄªÀÅ¢®è. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÉ D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ«
vÀ¤SÉ, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ, E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉ ªÀÄÄVzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjªÀÅ CAwªÀÄ DzÉÃ±À
ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è «¼ÀA§ DUÀ¢gÀÄªÀAvÉ £ÉÆÃrPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ
PÁ¯ÁªÀ¢üUÉ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇgÉÊ¸À®Ä PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀàµÀÖ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®AX¸ÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ vÁªÉÃ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÉ
M¼À¥ÀqÀ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉAiÉÄAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ w½¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
9. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ZÁZÀÆ vÀ¥ÀàzÉ
¥Á°¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
¸À»/÷Š
JA.JA, £ÁAiÀiïÌ
¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ
APPENDIX II
KARNATAKA LEGISLATURE
COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
(1986-87)
(EIGHTH ASSEMBLY)
FOURTEENTH REPORT
ON
THE MISAPPROPRIATIONS AND DEFALCATIONS OF GOVERNMENT
MONIES ETC; INCLUDED IN AUDIT REPORT OF C & AG FOR THE YEARS
1982-83 AND 1983-84 RELATING TO
DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations
Sl. Para No.
No. in the Report Conclusions/Recommendations
1 2 3
MISAPPROPRIATION AND DEFALCATION OF GOVERNMENT MONIES
1. 1.10 Despite all the instructions issued by the Government, in ordinate delay in
disciplinary proceedings is more the rule, than the exception. The Committee do
appreciate the need to give due regard to the principles of natural justice and the
need for providing safeguards to protect the interests of the Officer concerned. But
this should not become a cover for avoidable delays, making the entire rule
ineffective. Officers who have misused Government money or caused loss to
Government and who prime facie carry civil and criminal liabilities, (apart from
disciplinary action) also go scot free. There is no deterrent effect which the
Committee consider is the most important purpose of giving punishment in such
cases involving misuse of public money. In some cases there is deliberate, conscious
avoidance by causing delays and there is reason to believe that the officers who are
incharge of the investigation or the enquiry intentionally delay the matters to help the
guilty to escape the punishment. In any case, if there is delay, it may mitigate the
seriousness of the crime, and give room for (misplaced) sympathy. Recovery of the
pecuniary loss to Government may also become difficult to transfer of assets etc., by
the accused Government servant.
111 On the other hand, such delays may result in harassment of the accused, who may
not really be guilty, causing misery and tension. Officers are kept under suspension
for months and years. They have to suffer the agony, sometimes till their retirement
or death, since they cannot vindicate themselves until the final verdict is given.
So either way, delays cause harm both to Government and the Government servant.
The Public Accounts Committee have expressed their anxiety over the occurrence of
such delays, time and again. This situation requires to be remedied.
2. 1.11 Even if the prescribed rules/procedure cannot be modified or improved as
opined by the Chief Secretary there is an urgent need to devise suitable methods to
minimise avoidable delays which are sometimes deliberate. The Committee have
given some suggestions to improve matters in para 6.1. and they desire that
Government in the DPAR should apply itself to this subject and bring forth
necessary modifications in the procedures so that disciplinary proceedings are
completed atleast within one year from the date on which investigation is taken up.
CONCLUDING REMARKS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
10. 6.1 The number of cases of misappropriation and defalcation of Government monies
which are pending disposal has been increasing from year to year. As on 31st Oct.
1984, 304 cases were pending, of which 183 cases were pending for over 3 to 7
years. The delay is not so much due to the judicial nature of the work or the
elaborate procedure prescribed in the Rules for the conduct of formal investigations
and inquiry, for the built in safeguards to protect the interest of the Government
servant, as is generally made out. It is due in a larger measure to routine, avoidable
delays on the part of the Investigation/Inquiry Officers. Cases are also kept pending
in the Secretariat Departments. The Committee have reason to believe that at least in
some of these cases, delay is deliberate and intended to help the accused escape
punishment.
11 6.2 Due to such delays, there is no fear of punishment for the Officers who indulge
in malpractice in handling public money. This is amply illustrated by the 2 cases
involving senior officers detailed elsewhere in this report.
12 6.3 There is an urgent need to correct this position the committee recommended that
(i) The Officers appointed to conduct investigations and inquiries
under the CCA Rules should be selected with some care. Suitable guide
lines should be issued for their use since unfamiliarity with the prescribed
procedure also contributes to delay and reluctance to take up this work.
(ii) After the Investigating Officer/the Inquiry Officer is nominated,
there should be no charge in the nomination for any reason. The
Investigation/Inquiry should be completed within a period of 3 months.
The entire disciplinary proceedings should in any case be completed within
one year.
(iii) The rules provide several safeguards to protect the interests of the
accused Government servant. At the same time it also provides for expert
enquiry if the Government servant does not give his written statement of
defence or otherwise fails or refuses to comply with the provisions of the
rule at any stage of the Inquiry. The Investigating/Inquiry Officers should
take suitable action under these provisions, where the Government servant
tries to stay the department proceedings or does not co-operate in the early
completion of the Inquiry.
(iv) The progress of the Investigation/Inquiry proceedings should be
properly monitored till final orders are passed. Final action should be
completed within one year. Delays should be properly explained to the
satisfaction of the Secretary of the concerned department.
Action taken by Government in this matter may be reported to the
Committee within three months.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 35 J¸ïrE 86, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ,
¢£ÁAPÀ 7£ÉÃ d£ÀªÀj 1987.
«µÀAiÀÄ : CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï «¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
G¯ÉèÃR : C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 13 J¸ïrE 85 ¢£ÁAPÀ 3.7.1985
¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É :
G¯ÉèÃTvÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è, AiÀiÁªÀ AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ, ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉ:E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ
£ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è JµÀÄÖ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄªÀgÉ«UÉ D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è
ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀ «µÀAiÀÄUÀ¼À£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆAqÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. ºÁUÀÆ
£ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ PÉ®ªÀÅ GUÀæªÁzÀ D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ½UÉ FqÁVgÀÄªÀ D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è »ÃUÉ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ PÁ¯ÁªÀ¢üUÉ CAnPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀ¢gÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ÄÃj
CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À§ºÀÄzÉÃ JA§ÄzÀgÀ §UÉÎ
¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. EAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ DzÉÃ±ÀPÉÌ ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¹ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ²¥sÁgÀ¸Àì£ÀÄß ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä MAzÀÄ
¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¸ÀÄªÀ «µÀAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß PÀÆ®APÀÄµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ.
DzÉÃ±À
E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ M¼À¥ÀqÀ°gÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ M¼À¥ÀnÖgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è
¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À PÁ¯ÁªÀ¢üUÉ CAnPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀzÉ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ÄÃj CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß
ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä C£ÀÄPÀÆ®ªÁUÀ®Ä
CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ²ð¹ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ²¥sÁgÀ¸Àì£ÀÄß ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆAqÀ
¥ÀgÁªÀÄ±ÀðPÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¸À¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ.
1) C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð Š CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ
2) ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, DqÀ½vÀ Š ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ
E¯ÁSÉ, (£ËPÀgÀgÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀåªÀºÀj¸ÀÄªÀªÀgÀÄ)
3) C¥ÀgÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÁ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄ) Š ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ
2. ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ±ÀðPÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä CºÀðªÁzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀzÀj ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ
ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ. ºÁUÀÆ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ
ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä GzÉÝÃ²¹zÀ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆAqÀ n¥ÀàtÂAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ
J¯Áè ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀåjUÉ ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀQÌAvÀ MAzÀÄ ªÁgÀQÌAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ¬Ä®èzÀ CªÀ¢üVAvÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä MzÀV¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
3. ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
ªÀåªÀºÀj¸ÀÄªÀ ¸ÀºÀ:G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀÄ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÁV PÁAiÀÄð ¤ªÀð»¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ EAvÀºÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ. ºÁUÀÆ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ
ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä GzÉÝÃ²¹zÀ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆAqÀ n¥ÀàtÂAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ J¯Áè
¸ÀzÀ¸ÀåjUÉ MzÀV¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
4. ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ) ªÀåªÀºÀj¸À®àqÀÄªÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ½UÉ F
DzÉÃ±ÀªÀÅ C£Àé¬Ä¸ÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÕÁ£ÀÄ¸ÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
©.PÉ. ¸ÀAUÉÆÃgÁªÀÄ,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üÃ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 16 ¸ÉÃE« 87 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
«µÀAiÀÄ: E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉŠ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ G¥À ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ
¹§âA¢AiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR: 1) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå r¦Jgï 5 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 79 ¢£ÁAPÀ 8Š7Š81 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 17Š8Š81.
2) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå. r¦Jgï 12 J¸ïrE 86 ¢£ÁAPÀ 22Š5Š86
G¯ÉèÃTvÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀUÀ¼À°ègÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀAvÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt,
¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è CxÀªÁ
E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆrzÀgÉ
CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ ¹§âA¢AiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ
C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸À®Ä CªÀPÁ±À«zÉ. F C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀUÀ¼À°ègÀÄªÀ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£À¥Àðj²Ã°¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
2. PÀvÀðªÀå¢AzÀ C£À¢üPÀøvÀ UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è CxÀªÁ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÀÆrzÀgÉ E£ÀÄß
ªÀÄÄAzÉ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ G¥À ¯ÉÆÃPÀAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¹§âA¢ ªÀUÀðzÀ°è PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ
C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ¨ÉÃQ®è JAzÀÄ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀ ¤zsÀðj¹zÉ. DzÀÝjAzÀ
CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11 (2) gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ ©zÀÝ°è,
E¯ÁSÁ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸À®Ä ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
3. FUÁUÀ¯ÉÃ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ ¹§âA¢AiÀÄ¯ÉÆ§âgÀ£ÀÄß
«ZÀgÀuÁ¢üPÁj JAzÀÄ £ÉÃ«Ä¸À®àlÖ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è CªÀgÉÃ «ZÁgÀuÉ ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀj¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. CªÀjAzÀ
«ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß »AvÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÁgÀzÀÄ.
4. ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ¸ÀgÀPÁjÃ £ËPÀgÀgÀ C£À¢üPÀøvÀ UÉÊgÀÄºÁdj
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ PÁAiÀÄð«zsÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß E£ÀÄß
ªÀÄÄAzÉ C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
¸À»/÷Š
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
¸ÀASÉå. r¦JDgï 25 J¸ïrE 84 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ: PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«)
¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957 D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ ªÀÄºÁ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä
JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ µÉÆÃPÁ¸ï ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀàµÀÖ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
G¯ÉèÃR: ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå r¦JDgï 8 J¸ïrE 82, ¢£ÁAPÀ 28£ÉÃ K¦æ¯ï 82 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 17£ÉÃ
dÄ¯ÉÊ 82.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ
8£ÉÃ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ (5)jAzÀ (8)£ÉÃ zÀAqÀ£ÉUÀ¼À°è AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß D¥Á¢vÀ
£ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ µÉÆÃPÁ¸ï £ÉÆÃn¸ï ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ
«µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À°è ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. F ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À°ègÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß JLDgï 1986 J¸ï.¹ 1173gÀ°è ¥ÀæPÀlªÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀªÉÇðÃ£ÀßvÀ
£ÁåAiÀÄÁ®AiÀÄzÀ wÃ¥ÀÅð ªÀÄvÀÄÛ LJ¯ïDgï 1986 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ 2245 gÀ°è ¥ÀæPÀlªÁVgÀÄªÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ GZÀÑ
£ÁåAiÀÄ®AiÀÄzÀ wÃ¦ð£À »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ.
3. GZÀÑ £ÁåAiÀÄÁ®AiÀÄzÀ «¨sÁVÃAiÀÄ ¦ÃoÀªÀÅ LJ¯ïDgï 1986 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ 2245gÀ°è ¥ÀæPÀlªÁVgÀÄªÀ
wÃ¦ð£À°è ¸ÀªÉÇðÃ£ÀßvÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ vÀÄ¼À¹gÁA ¥ÀmÉÃ¯ïgÀªÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¤ÃrzÀ wÃ¦ð£À
»£Àß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è JA.¦. £ÁAiÀiïÌ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è (jmï Cfð ¸ÀASÉå 17572Š1980) ¤ÃrzÀ wÃ¥ÀÅð
HfðvÀªÀ®èªÉAzÀÄ wÃ¦ðwÛzÉ. vÀvÁÌ°PÀªÁV AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ªÀÄºÁ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ
«¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ µÉÆÃPÁ¸ï £ÉÆÃnÃ¸À£ÀÄß PÉÆqÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæªÉÄÃAiÀÄ«®è.
DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À°è ¤ÃrgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀPÀët¢AzÀ »AvÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¯ÁVzÉ.
4. DzÀgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À°ègÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À
¥ÀæPÁgÀ FUÁUÀ¯ÉÃ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ µÉÆÃPÁ¸ï £ÉÆÃnÃ¸À£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÀÝgÉ CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è £ÉÆÃnÃ¹UÉ
GvÀÛgÀ ¸À°è¸À®Ä ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄÄ ªÀÄÄVzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ MAzÀÄ ªÉÃ¼É CªÀ¢üAiÉÆ¼ÀUÉ GvÀÛgÀªÀ£ÀÄß
¸À°è¹zÀÝgÉ CzÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¹ CAwªÀÄ wÃªÀiÁð£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
5. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ F ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
vÀªÀÄä C¢üÃ£ÀzÀ°è PÁAiÀÄð ¤ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ ºÁUÀÆ ¥Á°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
¸À»/÷Š
JA. JA. £ÁAiÀiïÌ
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ.
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 17£ÉÃ ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 1987.
«µÀAiÀÄ: PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ,
1957 ªÀgÀzÀQëuÉ «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è ªÀÄgÀt ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è M¼ÀUÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðjÃ
£ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÀÆqÀ®Ä GzÉÝÃ²¹gÀÄªÀ CxÀªÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ ¨ÁQ
EgÀÄªÀ CxÀªÁ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄAiÀÄÄ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ ºÀAvÀzÀ°è CxÀªÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ
ºÀAvÀzÀ°èzÀÝgÉ, CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è M¼ÀUÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðjÃ £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ®Ä PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 10gÀ (1) £ÉÃ
G¥À ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ CªÀPÁ±À«zÉ. CzÉÃ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ (2)£ÉÃ G¥À ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ
Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðjÃ £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß 48 UÀAmÉUÀ½VAvÀ ºÉaÑ£À CªÀ¢üAiÀÄªÀgÉ«UÉ
zÀ¸ÀÛVjAiÀÄ°èzÀÝgÉ, zÀ¸ÀÛVjAiÉÆ¼ÀUÁzÀ ¢ªÀ¸À¢AzÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¯ÁVzÉAiÉÄAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¸À®Ä CªÀPÁ±À«zÉ.
2. AiÀiÁªÀ AiÀiÁªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ§ºÀÄzÉAzÀÄ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ
¸ÀASÉå r¦JDgï 13 J¸ïrE 85 ¢£ÁAPÀ 3.7.1985gÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
3. ªÀÄ»¼ÉAiÀÄgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ £ÀqÉAiÀÄÄªÀ C¥ÀgÁzsÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ wÃªÀæªÁV ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÁzÀÝjAzÀ
CzÀgÀ®Æè ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ EAvÀºÀ C¥ÀgÁzsÀUÀ½UÉ M¼ÀUÁUÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ GUÀæ PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ
CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ EgÀÄªÀÅzÀjAzÀ zÀAqÀ¸ÀA»vÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀjZÉáÃzÀ 304Š© AiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀÄªÀAvÀºÀ ªÀgÀzÀQëuÉ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è M¼ÀUÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ «µÀAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃQ¹zÉ. ¸ÀzÀj
¥ÀjZÉáÃzÀªÀÅ F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAwzÉ.
"304-B (1) Where the death of a woman is caused by any burns or bodily injury or occurs
otherwise than under normal circumstances within seven years of her marriage and it is
shown that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty or harrassment by her husband
or any relative of her husband for or in connection with, any demand for dowry, such death
shall be called "dowry death", and such husband or relative shall be deemed to have caused
her death.
Explanation: For the purpose of this sub-section "dowry" shall have same meaning as in
section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act 1961."
4. zÀAqÀ¸ÀA»vÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀjZÉáÃzÀ 304Š© ¥ÀæPÁgÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¸ÀPÁðjÃ £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ¥ÉÇÃ°Ã¹£ÀªÀgÀÄ
PÉÃ¸À£ÀÄß zÁR®Ä ªÀiÁrzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è, CAvÀºÀ £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ
10 (1)£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ®Ä ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
(1) ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ÀgÀÄ PÉÃ¸À£ÀÄß zÁR®Ä ªÀiÁrzÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðjÃ £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ

zÀ¸ÀÛVjAiÀiÁzÀ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è CAvÀºÀ zÀ¸ÀÛVj CªÀ¢üAiÀÄÄ JµÉÖÃ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄªÀgÉVzÀÝgÀÆ
¸ÀºÀ CAvÀºÀªÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
(2) zÀ¸ÀÛVjAiÀiÁUÀ¢zÀÝgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï zÀAqÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÀiÁ ¸ÀA»vÉ 1973 ¥ÀjZÉÒÃzÀ
173gÀ G¥À§AzsÀ (2)gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ªÀiÁåf¸ÉÖçÃmïgÀªÀgÀ ¸ÀªÀÄÄäRzÀ°è
¥ÉÆ°Ã¹£ÀªÀgÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹zÀ vÀPÀët CAvÀºÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ°è ªÉÄÃ¯ÉÆßÃlPÉÌ
¸ÀPÁðjÃ £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ C¥ÀgÁzsÀªÀ£ÀÄß J¸ÀVzÁÝ£ÉAzÀÄ PÀAqÀ §AzÀ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è D
vÀPÀët¢AzÀ CAvÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðjÃ £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ°èqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
5. £Á®Ì£ÉÃ PÀArPÉAiÀÄ°è w½¹gÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ wÃªÀæªÁV PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä C£ÀÄªÁUÀÄªÀAvÉ ¥ÉÇÃ°Ã¸ï
E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉ ¸À°è¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄSÁå¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ªÀgÀ¢
¸À°è¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. F §UÉÎ qÉÊgÉPÀÖgï d£ÀgÀ¯ï D¥sï ¥ÉÇÃ°¸ï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E£ïì¥ÉPÀÖgï d£ÀgÀ¯ï D¥sï ¥ÉÇÃ°¸ï
CªÀgÀÄ ¥ÉÇÃ°Ã¸ï E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ J¯Áè C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀ½¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
6. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ZÁZÀÆ vÀ¥ÀàzÉ
¥Á°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ ºÁUÀÆ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀªÀÄä C¢üÃ£ÀzÀ°è PÁAiÀÄð ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄªÀ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À
UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
¸À»/÷Š
JA.JA £ÁAiÀiïÌ
(¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ).
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 26£ÉÃ CPÉÆÖÃ§gï 1987.
«µÀAiÀÄ: E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛPÉÌ
ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR: 1) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå r¦JDgï 5 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 79 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 8Š7Š81.
2) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå. r¦JDgï 5 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 79 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 17Š8Š81.
3) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå. r¦JDgï 12 J¸ïrE 86 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 22Š5Š86.

4) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå. r¦JDgï 117 PÉJ¯ïAiÀÄÄ 86 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 14Š7Š87.
5) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå. ¹D¸ÀÄE 16 ¸ÉÃE« 87 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21Š7Š87
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ 1957gÀ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11 gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è CxÀªÁ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è, AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É PÀvÀðªÀå¢AzÀ C£À¢üPÀøvÀ UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdgÁUÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß½zÀÄ EvÀgÉÃ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆrzÀgÉ CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è
¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÀAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¹§âA¢AiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
«ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀ «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è G¯ÉèÃR 1,2,3 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 5gÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ
eÕÁ¥À£ÀUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß 1984 G¥À§AzsÀ 7gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï
¸ÉÃªÉ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957 ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 14ŠJ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ E¯ÁSÁ
vÀ¤SÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛPÉÌ ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃR 4gÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ
eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
3. ¸ÀPÁðjÃ £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÆj¸À¯ÁzÀ D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ UÀÄgÀÄvÀgÀªÁVzÀÄÝ, CªÀÅ gÀÄdÄªÁvÁVzÀÝ°è
CªÀ¤UÉ zÉÆqÀØ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß (major penalty) «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀÆPÀÛªÉAzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §AzÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ªÀiÁvÀæ ¹¹J ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À 11£ÉÃ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
£ÀqÉ¸À¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. E¤ßvÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è CzÀgÀ®Æè £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ°gÀÄªÀ D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß gÀÄdÄªÁvÀÄ
¥Àr¸À®Ä £ÉÃgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀgÀ¼ÀªÁzÀ ¥ÀÅgÁªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ EzÀÝ°è 11£ÉÃ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ «ZÁgÀuÉ ºÀÆqÀÄªÀ
CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ EgÀÄªÀÅ¢®è. DzÁUÀÆå 11£ÉÃ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÁægÀA©ü¹zÀ°è D
«ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¹§âA¢ ªÀUÀðzÀªÀ¯ÉÆè§âjUÉ ªÀ»¹ E¯ÁSÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤ªÀð»¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ
dªÁ¨ÁÝjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä C£ÀÄªÁUÀÄªÀAvÉ ¸ÀtÚ ¥ÀÅlÖ D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ EgÀÄªÀ°è ¸ÀºÀ 11£ÉÃ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀAvÉ
«ZÁgÀuÉ ¥ÁægÀA©ü¹gÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÉ. ¥ÁæªÀÄÄRåªÁzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁvÀæ
¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ, G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ ¹§âA¢ ªÀUÀðzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ
C¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸À®Ä C£ÀÄªÁUÀÄªÀAvÉ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ CªÀ±ÀåªÁVzÉ. CzÀgÀAvÉ E£ÀÄß
ªÀÄÄAzÉ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É EgÀÄªÀ D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À UÀºÀ£ÀvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß wÃªÀæªÁV
¥Àj²Ã°¹ ¹¹J ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À 11£ÉÃ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀªÉÃ «ZÁgÀuÉ ºÀÆqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ CvÀåªÀ±ÀåªÉÃ CxÀªÁ 12£ÉÃ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¹zÀgÉ ¸Á®zÉÃ JA§ §UÉÎ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤tðAiÀÄ
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. 11£ÉÃ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀAvÉ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¹zÀ §½PÀªÀÇ gÀÄdÄªÁvÁUÀ§ºÀÄzÁzÀ D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À
»£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è PÉÃªÀ® aPÀÌ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß (minor penalty) «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÁzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è 12£ÉÃ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀAvÉAiÉÄÃ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÀÆqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
4. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ZÁZÀÆ vÀ¥ÀàzÉ
¥Á°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
¸À»/÷Š
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ E¯ÁSÉ.
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated 28th March 1988.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub: Sanction for prosecution of Government servants-instructions regarding.
According to Section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act or Section 197 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, sanction of the authority competent to remove a Government servant from
service is necessary for prosecuting a Government servant who is accused of any offence alleged
to have been committed by him while discharging his official duties.
2. Before according sanction for the prosecution of a Government servant, the competent
authority has to satisfy itself that there is a prima facie case against the concerned Government
servant necessitating his prosecution in a court of law and that such a competent authority has
applied its mind to the material placed before it.
3. The above facts should be reflected in the order sanctioning prosecution as a speaking order.
4. All the appointing authorities are requested to bear in mind the above instructions and ensure
that only speaking orders are issued in such cases.
sd/-
M.M. Naik
Additional Secretary to Government,
Dept. of Personnel and Admnv. Reforms,
(Service Rules).
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 6£ÉÃ dÆ£ï 1988.
«µÀAiÀÄ: ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR: C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå r¦JDgï 13 J¸ïrE 85 ¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š7Š85
AiÀiÁªÀ AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃTvÀ
C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ PÀArPÉ 2gÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸À¯ÁVzÉ ºÁUÀÆ AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è PÀqÁØAiÀÄªÁV EqÀ¨ÉÃPÉA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ 10 (2)£ÉÃ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ®Ä C¢üPÁgÀ«gÀÄªÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ
eÕÁ¥À£À:¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¸ÀzÉÃ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°ènÖgÀÄªÀ PÉ®ªÀÅ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÉ.
UÀÄgÀÄvÀgÀªÁzÀ D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ½®èzÉ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀÅzÀjAzÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ CAvÀºÀ
£ËPÀgÀgÀ ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀ®èzÉ EzÀjAzÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ DyðPÀ ªÉZÀÑªÀÅ ¸ÀºÀ DUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ®Ä C¢üPÁgÀ«gÀÄªÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èlÄÖ DzÉÃ±À ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃTvÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ
ªÀiÁUÀð ¸ÀÆaAiÀÄ CrAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CAvÀºÀ £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß zÀÆgÀzÀ eÁUÀPÉÌ: ¨ÉÃgÉ PÀbÉÃjUÉ
ªÀUÁð¬Ä¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀjAzÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæªÉÄÃAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß vÀ¦à¸À§ºÀÄzÉÃ JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¹ C£ÀAvÀgÀ
¸ÀÆPÀÛ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ®Ä
§gÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¥Àj²Ã°¸À®Ä PÉÆÃjzÉ. ºÁUÀÆ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀ®Ä PÉÆÃjzÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
f.J£ï. £ÁAiÀÄPï
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 6£ÉÃ CPÉÆÖÃ§gï 88.
«µÀAiÀÄ: gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼À°è ¥ÁæzÉÃ²PÀ ¥Áæw¤zsÀåvÉAiÀÄ PÀÄjvÀÄŠPÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
(ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ C£ÀÄ§AzsÀ 11
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 111 PÉÌ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr.
G¯ÉèÃR: C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå ¹ÇÀÄE 24 ¸ÉÃ£É¤ 87 ¢£ÁÄPÀ 24Š9Š88.
gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼À°è ¥ÁæzÉÃ²PÀ ¥Áæw¤zsÀåvÉAiÀÄ ÇÀªÀÄvÉÆÃ®£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¤ÃV¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆArgÀÄªÀ ¤tðAiÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃTvÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹zÉ. CªÀÅUÀ¼À°è PÉ¼ÀUÉ
£ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ ¤tðAiÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C£ÀÄµÁ×£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀ¨ÉÃPÁzÀgÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ C£ÀÄ§AzsÀ 11 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 111gÀ°è ««zsÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À°ègÀÄªÀ
ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ½UÉ FUÀ £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃQ¹ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr
ºÉÆgÀr¸À¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
(C) J¯Áè UÀÆæ¥ïŠr ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼ÀÆ ¸ÉÃjzÀAvÉ f¯ÁèªÁgÀÄ
ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼ÁV ¥ÀjªÀwð¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ D DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
(D) f¯ÁèªÁgÀÄ ªÀøAzÀzÀ°è FUÁUÀ¯ÉÃ EgÀÄªÀ J¯Áè UÀÆæ¥ïŠ¹ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À£ÀÄß f¯ÁèªÁgÀÄ ªÀøAzÀUÀ¼ÁVAiÉÄÃ
ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀj¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CzÀgÀAvÉ £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
(E) MAzÀQÌAvÀ ºÉaÑ£À ¤AiÉÆÃd£Á «¨sÁUÀUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É C¢üPÁgÀ ªÁå¦Û ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ PÀbÉÃjUÀ¼À°ègÀÄªÀ
ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ J¯Áè «¨sÁUÀUÀ½AzÀ®Æ ¹§âA¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀUÀð§®zÀ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ£ÀÄ¸ÁgÀ
¤AiÉÆÃf¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¨sÀwð ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÁVgÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß ©lÄÖ C¢üÃ£À PÀbÉÃjUÀ½gÀÄªÀAvÀºÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À°è£À
gÁdåªÁgÀÄ UÀÆæ¥ïŠ¹ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «¨sÁUÀªÁgÀÄ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼ÁV ¥ÀjªÀwð¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CzÀgÀAvÉ £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw
ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
2. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ CªÀgÀ ¤AiÀÄAvÀætPÉÆÌ¼À¥ÀqÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄUÀ½AzÀ
ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ ¤tðAiÀÄzÀAvÉ ¹.¹.J. ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ºÉÆgÀr¸À®Ä ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
vÀj¹PÉÆAqÀÄ C£ÀAvÀgÀ CzÀ£ÀÄß ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼À C£ÀÄ§AzsÀ 11 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 111 gÀ°è ºÁ° EgÀÄªÀ
£ÀªÀÄÆzÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ºÉÆÃ°¹ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ²¥sÁgÀ¹£ÉÆA¢UÉ ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ (¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ)
E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
¸À»/÷Š
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 31£ÉÃ d£ÀªÀj 1989.
«µÀAiÀÄ: C£À¢üPÀøvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß PÉ®¸ÀPÉÌ ªÁ¥À¸ÀÄì vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ
§UÉÎŠ¸ÀàµÀÖ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
G¯ÉèÃR: ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå r¦JDgï 30 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 79 ¢£ÁAPÀ 17Š4Š79.
C£À¢üPÀøvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdgÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¹
CAvÀºÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß PÉ®¸À¢AzÀ vÉUÉzÀÄºÁPÀÄªÀ CxÀªÁ ªÀeÁ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è
C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
2. C£À¢üPÀøvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdgÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆqÀÄªÀ
ªÉÆzÀ¯ÉÃ CxÀªÁ ºÀÆrzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ ªÀÄÄVAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀgÉÆ¼ÀUÉ CAvÀºÀ £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ PÉ®¸ÀPÉÌ
ºÁdgÁUÀ®Ä ªÀÄÄAzÉ §AzÀgÉ CAvÀºÀªÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄzÀ §UÉÎ PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
3. G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è FUÁUÀ¯ÉÃ £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀAvÉ C£À¢üPÀøvÀ UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdgÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ vÁ£ÀÄ C£À¢üPÀøvÀ UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdgÁzÀ PÁgÀt ªÉÆzÀ®Ä ºÉÆA¢zÀ ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅ¢®è.
DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ C£À¢üPÀøvÀ UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdjAiÀÄ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è CAvÀºÀªÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¹
PÉ®¸À¢AzÀ vÉUÉzÀÄºÁUÀzÉ EzÀÝ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è CAvÀºÀ UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdj CªÀ¢üAiÀÄÄ JµÉÖÃ DVgÀ° CªÀ£ÀÄ ªÁ¥À¸ï
§AzÀgÉ CAvÀºÀªÀ£À£ÀÄß PÉ®¸ÀPÉÌ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. »ÃUÉ PÉ®¸ÀPÉÌ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ CªÀ±ÀåªÉ¤¹zÀ°è
C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå r¦JDgï 13 J¸ïrE 85 ¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š7Š85gÀ°ègÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ CAvÀºÀ
£ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èlÄÖ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ CxÀªÁ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀzÉÃ E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¹ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ.
4. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV
¥Á°¸À®Ä ªÀÄvÀÄÛ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀªÀÄä C¢ü£ÀzÀ°è PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ J¯Áè £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À
UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀ®Ä ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
f.J¸ï. £ÁAiÀÄPï
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 28£ÉÃ dÆ£ï 1989
«µÀAiÀÄ: ®AZÀ ¤ªÀÄÆð®£Á C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ CrAiÀÄ°è vÀ¤SÉUÉ M¼ÀUÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
®AZÀ ¤ªÀÄÆð®£Á C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ CrAiÀÄ¯ÁèUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ E£ÁßªÀÅzÉÃ «µÀAiÀÄPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ
vÀ¤SÉUÉ M¼ÀUÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇtð vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÁ¬ÄÝj¹ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀAvÉ
¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ, E£ï¸ÉàPÀÖgï d£ÀgÀ¯ïgÀªÀjAzÀ §gÀÄªÀ ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ F
«µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ DVAzÁUÉÎ ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À CrAiÀÄ°è DzsÀåvÉAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¥Àj²Ã°¹
CAvÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ§ºÀÄzÉÃ CxÀªÁ ¨ÉÃqÀªÉÃ JA§ÄzÀgÀ §UÉÎ ²¥sÁgÀ¸À£ÀÄß
¹éÃPÀj¹zÀ JgÀqÀÄ ªÁgÀzÉÆ¼ÀUÉ ¤zsÀðj¹ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀÅzÁzÀgÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À®Ä PÀæªÀÄ
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀªÀÄä C¢üÃ£ÀzÀ°è
PÁAiÀÄð ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄªÀ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀÄªÀAvÉ PÉÆÃjzÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated 11th October 1989.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub: Revocation of suspension order on the quashing of suspension order by the courts -
guidelines.
An instance has come to the notice of the Government where a Government servant who
was placed under suspension has immediately returned and reported to duty in the very place from
which he was placed under suspension soon after the suspension order was quashed, without
waiting for issue of orders by the competent authority revoking the suspension. In its order dated
8th August 1988 in application No. 868.1987, the KAT has also observed that the conduct of the
concerned Government Servant in so reporting back to duty and assuming the charge of the post
without obtaining prior permission of the superior authorities does not amount to any misconduct,
as no instruction of Government laying down guidelines as to how a Government servant should
conduct himself after the orders suspending him were quashed by a Court of Law were brought to
its notice. The position is therefore clarified hereunder.
2. An order of suspension made or deemed to have been made under Rule 10 (5) of the
Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 continues to remain in
force until it is modified or revoked by the authority competent to do so. When a Government
servant is suspended and is relieved of his duties under Government, only subsistence allowance is
payable to him at the rates admissible under the rules. If the period of suspension is continued
beyond six months, the suspending authority has got power to either enhance or reduce the
subsistence allowance depending on the circumstances of each case. The payment of subsistence
allowance at the rates admissible initially under the rules or at the varied rates as determined by
the suspending authority later on will be authorised by the audit only on receipt of specific orders
placing the Government servant under suspension and or varying rates of subsistence allowance.
Similarly when a Government servant's suspension is set aside by a Court of Law formal order by
the suspending authority revoking orders of suspension will be needed for the purpose of audit, to
authorise the payment of salary of the post to which the Government servant has been posted on
revocation of the suspension. It is for this purpose inter alia instructions have also been issued in
Circular No. DPAR 22 SSR 78 dated 29.12.1978 that whenever orders of suspension are revoked,
posting orders should also be given simultaneously.
3. When orders of suspension are quashed by a Court of Law, the competent authority which
issued the suspension order has also the right to consider whether an appeal should be filed against
the orders of the Court or to implement the said order. It is no doubt appreciated that when order
of suspension are quashed by the Tribunal, the authority which placed the Government servant
under suspension is duty bound to take decision within the time stipulated for going in appeal,
failing which that authority subjects itself to attack for contempt of Court. The competent
authority may have, in some cases atleast, justifiable cause for delay in implementing the orders of
the Tribunal and that authority may even seek extension of time from the Tribunal itself, giving
reasons. In the event of occurrence of a gap between the date of order of the Tribunal quashing
suspension and the date of revocation of the suspension by the suspending authority and thereafter
the Government servant reporting to duty in the place of his posting, that gap will in any case be
treated as duty for all purposes, if otherwise eligible.
4. In view of the above positions, a Government servant under suspension cannot and
accordingly should not assume his post automatically on the ground that the suspension order has
been quashed. If any Government servant reports to duty in violation of these clarifications it will
be considered as an act of mis-conduct on his part. Suspending authority should after considering
the issue as discussed at para 3 of this O.M., issue the order receiving the suspension and
appointment against a post. Any decision in this regard should be taken expeditiously.
5. The Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments are requested to bear in mind the
above instructions and also bring to the notice of all the appointing authorities under their
administrative control.
sd/-
G.N. Nayak
Under Secretary to Government.
Dept. of Personnel and Admnv.
Reforms, (Service Rules).
«zsÁ£À ¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 22£ÉÃ ¥sÉ§æªÀj 90.
«µÀAiÀÄ: ¤ªÀøvÀÛ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¤ªÀøwÛAiÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ
CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ «¸ÀÛgÀuÉŠ PÁAiÀÄð¤ÃwAiÀÄ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï ¥Àj²Ã®£É.
G¯ÉèÃR: 1) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå r¦JDgï 42 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 77 ¢£ÁAPÀ 15Š12Š77
2) C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå r¦JDgï 10 J¸ïrE 83 ¢£ÁAPÀ 16Š6Š83.
G¯ÉèÃR (1)gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ªÀµÀðzÀ ªÀÄzsÁåªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è ¤ªÀøvÀÛgÁUÀÄªÀ G¥ÁzsÁåAiÀÄgÀÄ,
G¥À£Áå¸ÀPÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÁæzsÁå¥ÀPÀgÀ£ÀÄß «zÁåyðUÀ¼À ²PÀëtzÀ »vÀzÀø¶Ö¬ÄAzÀ ±ÉÊPÀëtÂPÀ ªÀµÀðzÀ PÉÆ£ÉAiÀÄªÀgÉUÉ
¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä DzÉÃ²¸À¯ÁVvÀÄÛ. G¯ÉèÃR (2)gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ºÉÃ½gÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ F
PÉ¼ÀV£À ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è ªÀiÁvÀæ ¤ªÀøvÀÛgÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ CªÀPÁ±À«vÀÄÛ.
(C) ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ««zsÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À PÀbÉÃj PÉÊ¦rUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
(D) vÁAwæPÀ CºÀðvÉUÀ¼ÀÄ CªÀ±ÀåPÀªÁzÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ½ÃUÉ CAvÀºÀ CºÀðvÉAiÀÄÄ¼Àî C¨sÀåyðUÀ¼ÀÄ zÉÆgÉAiÀÄ¢zÀÝ
¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è.
(E) «±ÉÃµÀ C£ÀÄ¨sÀªÀ ¥ÀqÉzÀ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ £ËPÀgÀgÀ (¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛgÁzÀªÀgÁUÀ° CxÀªÁ
SÁ¸ÀV ¸ÀA¸ÉÜ¬ÄAzÀ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛgÁzÀªÀgÁUÀ°) CªÀÄÆ®å ¸À®ºÉ, ¸ÉÃªÉ CªÀ±ÀåPÀ«gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è
ªÀiÁvÀæ.
2. ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÃ½gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄð¤ÃwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¥ÀÅ£ÀB «ªÀÄ²ð¹ F PÉ¼ÀV£ÀAvÉ
¤tð¬Ä¹zÉ.
3. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ «zÁå ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼À°è PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ ¨ÉÆÃzsÀPÀ ¹§âA¢UÀ¼ÁzÀ G¥ÁzsÁåAiÀÄgÀÄ,
G¥À£Áå¸ÀPÀgÀÄ, ¥ÉÇæ¥sÉ¸ÀgïUÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÊPÀëtÂPÀ ªÀµÀðzÀ ªÀÄzsÁåªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è ¤ªÀøwÛ ºÉÆAzÀÄwÛzÀÝgÉ CAvÀºÀ ¨ÉÆÃzsÀPÀ
¹§âA¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ C£ÀÄªÀÄw ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ ±ÉÊPÀëtÂPÀ ªÀµÀðzÀ PÉÆ£ÉAiÀÄvÀ£ÀPÀ ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°è
ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀj¸À®Ä »AzÉ EzÀÝAvÀºÀ CeÉÕAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀj¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
4. ¤ªÀøwÛ ºÉÆA¢zÀ £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÁUÀ° CxÀªÁ CªÀgÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ
«¸ÀÛgÀuÉAiÀiÁUÀ° ªÀiÁqÀPÀÆqÀzÀÄ. ¤ªÀøvÀÛgÁV ¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀzÀ DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀjAiÀÄÄwÛgÀÄªÀ
CxÀªÁ ¸ÉÃªÁ «¸ÀÛgÀuÉUÉÆAqÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°è FUÀ ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀjAiÀÄÄwÛgÀÄªÀ £ËPÀgÀgÀ:C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß F
PÀÆqÀ¯É eÁjUÉ §gÀÄªÀAvÉ ªÀÄÄPÁÛAiÀÄUÉÆ½¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
5. ªÉÄÃ¯É ¸ÀÆa¹gÀÄªÀ PÁAiÀÄð¤ÃwAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀPÁðj E¯ÁSÉUÀ½UÀÆ, ¸ÁéAiÀÄvÀÛ, ¸ÁéAiÀÄvÀÛªÀ®èzÀ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼ÀÄ,
¤UÀªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üÃ£ÀzÀ°ègÀÄªÀ CxÀªÁ ¤AiÀÄAvÀætzÀ°ègÀÄªÀ PÀA¥À¤UÀ½UÀÆ C£ÀéAiÀÄªÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
PÉ. »jAiÀÄtÚ
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 6 ¸ÉÃ¯ÉÆÃAiÀÄÄ 90 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 21£ÉÃ ªÀiÁZïð 1990.
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ: PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (¹¹J) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½ 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 14ŠJ C£ÀéAiÀÄ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÉUÁV PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛPÉÌ ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¤zÉðÃ±À£À.
G¯ÉèÃR: 1) ¸ÀPÁðj C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: r¦JDgï 83 J¸ïJ¯ïAiÀÄÄ 88 ¢£ÁAPÀ 22Š9Š1988.
2) ¸ÀPÁðj C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: r¦Jgï 117 PÉJ¯ïAiÀÄÄ 86, ¢£ÁAPÀ 14Š7Š1987
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 16Š3Š1988.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (¹¹J) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957 ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 14ŠJ C£ÀéAiÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ
«gÀÄzÀÞzÀ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ G¥À ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛPÉÌ ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É
G¯ÉèÃT¹gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀUÀ¼À°è ¤zÉðÃ±À£À ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸Àà¶ÖÃPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ G¥À ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛPÉÌ «ZÁgÀuÉUÁV ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÁUÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ PÉ®ªÀÅ CUÀvÀå zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ ªÀiÁ»wUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ®UÀwÛ¹ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¢gÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß
¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛªÀÅ UÀªÀÄ¤¹zÉ. J¯Áè CUÀvÀå zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀiÁ»wUÀ¼ÀÄ ®¨sÀå«®è¢gÀÄªÁUÀ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ
D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀnÖ ¹zÀÞ¥Àr¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀnÑAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
£ËPÀgÀjUÉ ¸ÀPÁ®PÉÌ w½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÉ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.
PÉ.¹.J¸ï. (¹¹J) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 14ŠJ C£ÀéAiÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀPÉÌ
¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ «ZÁgÀuÉ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÁV ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
ºÉÆgÀr¹zÁÝgÉ. F ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaAiÀÄ PÀArPÉ 8gÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÉUÁV ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛPÉÌ
ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÁUÀ ¸ÁªÀiÁ£ÀåªÁV ®UÀwÛ¹ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¢gÀÄªÀ PÉ®ªÀÅ §UÉAiÀÄ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀiÁ»wUÀ¼À
¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃT¹zÁÝgÉ. ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀÄªÀ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaAiÀÄ ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß F ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÉ
®UÀwÛ¹ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹zÉ.
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè E¯ÁSÁ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ J¯Áè DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ F
ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaAiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ£ÀzÀ°èlÄÖPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀAvÉ, «±ÉÃµÀªÁV ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaAiÀÄ PÀArPÉ 8
gÀ°ègÀÄªÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ£ÀzÀ°èlÄÖPÉÆAqÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (¹¹J) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½AiÀÄ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ
14ŠJ C£ÀéAiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛPÉÌ «ZÁgÀuÉUÁV ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÁUÀ CUÀvÀåªÁzÀ J¯Áè zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀiÁ»wUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ®UÀwÛ¹ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹PÉÆqÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß RavÀ¥Àr¹PÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀAvÉ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ PÉÆÃgÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
PÉ.J¸ï.J£ï. ªÀÄÆwð
ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated: 16th May 1990.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub: Prompt disposal of appeal petition submitted by the Government servant against the
order of the disciplinary authority by the appellate authority Instructions reg.-
According to Rule 18 of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal)
Rules, 1957, every person who is a member of the State Civil Services is entitled to appeal to the
extent and to the authorities specified therein against the order made by the Disciplinary authority
or by an Appellate or Reviewing authority imposing any of the penalties specified in Rule 8 of the
said rules..
2. In the case of an appeal against an order imposing any of the penalties specified in rule 8, the
Appellate authority has to consider the appeal petition in accordance with the provision contained
in Rule 25 of the said rules and pass such order as it deems just and equitable as provided under
Rule 25.
3. While disposing application No. 5578/89 filed by one Sri. N.Kondaiah Chowdry, F.D.A in
the department of Mines and Geology, on the ground that the appeal submitted to the Appellate
authority against the order of the Disciplinary authority was not disposed of for a long time, etc.,
the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal has observed as follows:
"It has been noticed by the Tribunal in scores of cases that because of the failure of the
Appellate authorities to pass a final order in respect of appeals filed before them within a
period of six months the Government officials concerned are forced to seek redress at the
hands of the Tribunal. This leads to a lot of avoidable litigation, apart from the unnecessary
increase in work load for all concerned as well as waste of time and energy and incurring of
unavoidable expenses. Since in a very large number of cases the Appellate authority
happens to be the State Government, it would be helpful if the State Government makes it a
point to ensure that all appeals filed by Government servants before them are disposed of
within a period of six months so that there would be no occasion for the concerned
Government servants to seek redress of their grievances at the hands of the Tribunal unless,
in a few cases where there may be aggrieved by the order passed in an appeal.
4. The Secretaries to Government and Heads of Department are requested to keep in mind the
observation made by the KAT while disposing of the appeal petitions and ensure that all appeals
filed by Government servants against the orders of the Disciplinary authority or Appellate or
Reviewing authority under Rule 18 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules, 1957, before the Appellate authorities are disposed of within a period of six
months.
5. These instructions should be brought to the notice of all the Disciplinary/Appellate
authorities under their administrative control.
sd/-
K. Hiriyanna
Dept. of Personnel & Admnv, Reforms,
(Service Rules).
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated: 10th July 1990.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub: Sanction for prosecution of Government servants-instructions regarding.
Ref: O.M. No. DPAR 16 SDE 88 dated 28.3.88.
In Official Memorandum dated 28.3.1988 referred to above, certain instructions regarding
sanction for prosecution of Government servants were issued. Now the Prevention of Corruption
Act, 1947 has been repealed by the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Section 19 of the said Act
provides for obtaining prior sanction of the Competent authority before prosecuting a Government
servant.
Rest of the instructions contained in the O.M. referred to above are reiterated.
All the Appointing authorities are requested to bear in mind the above instructions while
according sanction for the prosecution of a Government servant.
sd/-
K.K. Nadgir
Under Secretary to Government
Dept. of Personnel & Admn. Reforms,
(Service Rules).
¸ÀASÉå: ¹ D¸ÀÄE 6 J¸ïrE 91 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21Š3Š1992
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ: PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt, ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«)
¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ 1957 D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ PÀpt zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
G¯ÉèÃR: 1) ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 8 J¸ïrE 82, ¢£ÁAPÀ 28Š4Š82 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 17Š7Š82;
2) ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå:¹D¸ÀÄE 25 J¸ïrE 84, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 27Š7Š87
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ 1957gÀ
8£ÉÃ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ (v) jAzÀ (viii)gÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉUÀ¼À°è AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß D¥Á¢vÀ
£ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ µÉÆÃPÁ¸ï £ÉÆÃn¸ï ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ
«µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À°è ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
F ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À°ègÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß J.L.Dgï. 1986 J¸ï.¹. 1173 gÀ°è ¥ÀæPÀlªÁVgÀÄªÀ
¸ÀªÉÇðÃ£ÀßvÀ £ÁåAiÀÄÁ®AiÀÄzÀ wÃ¥ÀÅð ªÀÄvÀÄÛ L.J.Dgï. 1986 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ 2245gÀ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀ GZÀÑ
£ÁåAiÀÄÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ ¤ÃrzÀ wÃ¥ÀÅðUÀ¼À »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
DzÀgÉ vÀzÀ£ÀAvÀgÀ ¸ÀªÉÇðÃ£ÀßvÀ £ÁåAiÀÄÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ 1991 (1) J¸ï.J¯ï.Dgï. 159gÀ°è ¥ÀæPÀlªÁVgÀÄªÀ
¨sÁgÀvÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ ªÀ¸Àð¸ï gÀªÀÄeÁ£ïªÉÆºÀªÀÄäzï SÁ£ï CªÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁzÀ wÃ¦ð£À°è ºÁUÀÆ
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ DqÀ½vÀ £ÁåAiÀÄªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄÄ Cfð ¸ÀASÉå:606:9 (²æÃ ªÀÄ½ªÀiÁ¸ÀÛAiÀÄåŠªÀ¸Àð¸ïŠPÀ£ÁðlPÀ)zÀ°è
²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ºÉÆgÀvÁV ¨ÉÃgÉ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¹zÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è
D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ ¹.¹.J. ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½AiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ PÀpt zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß
«ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß MzÀV¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ wÃ¥ÀÅð ¤ÃrzÉ.
DzÀÝjAzÀ ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ wÃ¥ÀÅðUÀ¼À »£Àß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è G¯ÉèÃRzÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹zÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À°è ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁzÀ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¨sÁUÀ±ÀB ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¹, ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉÃ²¹zÉ:Š
"E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ºÉÆgÀvÁV ¨ÉÃgÉ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ £ÀqÉ¹zÀ
¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½ 1957gÀ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 8gÀ CrAiÀÄ°èAiÀÄ (v) jAzÀ (viii) gÀ°è£À PÀpt zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ
ªÉÆzÀ®Ä ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ «ZÁgÀuÁ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DvÀ¤UÉ MzÀV¹
D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ vÀ£Àß CºÀªÁ®£ÀÄß ºÉÃ½PÉÆ¼Àî®Ä ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀiÁªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÉÆlÄÖ ªÀÄÄA¢£À PÀæªÀÄ
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÀÄ. DzÀgÉ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ vÁ£ÀÄ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ «¢ü¸À®Ä GzÉÝÃ²¹zÀ
zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ w½¸ÀÄªÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ EgÀÄªÀÅ¢®è."
DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ J¯Áè E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ F
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀªÀÄä C¢üÃ£ÀzÀ°è PÁAiÀÄð ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄªÀ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À
UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ ºÁUÀÆ ¥Á°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
¸À»/÷Š
ªÉÆÃwgÁªÀiï ¥ÀªÁgï
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üÃ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðŠ2
No.DPAR 22 SRR 93 Karnataka Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated: 14th July 1993
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub: Departmental Promotion Committee in respect of promotions to State Services
on the basis of seniority-cum-merit-Procedure when a Departmental
Enquiry/Court Proceedings is pending.
Ref: O.M. No. DPAR 5 SRC 84, dated : 9.10.1985.
The instructions issued in para 7 of the Official Memorandum dated: 09-10-1985
referred to above have been further examined and the following instructions are issued in
its place:
2. Where a departmental enquiry or court proceeding is pending the following course of
action shall be taken.
3. The Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) shall assess the suitability of the
officer/official for promotion without taking into consideration the disciplinary
proceedings/court proceedings pending against the officer/official. The assessment on the
basis of records, the view of the DPC shall be kept in a sealed cover. In the subsequent
DPCs also, if any, during the period of disciplinary/court proceedings, the DPC shall
consider the officer's, official's case and record its findings which will again be kept in a
sealed cover in the above manner.
4. On the conclusion of the disciplinary/court proceedings and in case the
officer/official is exhonerated, the sealed cover or covers may be opened and the earliest
possible date of promotion but for the pendency of the disciplinary/court proceedings
against him/her, may be determined with reference to the position (s) assigned to him/her
in the findings in the sealed cover/covers with reference to date of promotion of his/her
junior on the basis of such position. The officer/official concerned may then be promoted
in accordance with rules if necessary by reverting the junior most officiating person.
5. If any penalty is imposed on the officer/official as a result of the disciplinary
proceedings or if he is found guilty in the court proceedings, the findings in the sealed
cover/covers shall not be acted upon. The officer's/officials case for promotion may be
considered in the usual manner by the next DPC which meets in the normal course after
conclusion of the disciplinary/court proceedings.
6. The sealed cover procedure contemplated herein above, shall be adopted only after
the date of issuance of charge Memo/Charge Sheet, that being the date from which the
disciplinary proceedings can be taken to have been initiated.
7. The same procedure as detailed above shall be followed where an officer/official is
placed under suspension. On his reinstatement in service at any stage of the enquiry the
procedure as explained in para 3 of this O.M. shall be followed and on conclusion of the
enquiry the procedure as indicated in paragraph 4 and 5 shall be followed.
sd/-
P. Ramanath
Under Secretary to Government-I
Department of Personnel and
Administrative Reforms
(Service Rules).
¸ÀASÉå: ¹ D¸ÀÄE 12 ¸ÉÃ E« 94 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ: PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ
1957ŠD¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀjUÉ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÁ £ÀAvÀgÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ
ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉÆlÄÖ vÀzÀ£ÀAvÀgÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR: ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 6 J¸ïrE 91, ¢£ÁAPÀ 21Š3Š1992.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ê£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ 1957gÀ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 8gÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ v jAzÀ viii gÀªÀgÉV£À PÀpt zÀAqÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ
ªÉÆzÀ®Ä ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ EzÁÝUÀÆå PÀÆqÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ
PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸ÀÄwÛ®èªÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ DqÀ½vÀ £ÁåAiÀÄ ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄÄ
Cfð ¸ÀASÉå: 540:94 gÀ°è ¢£ÁAPÀ 6Š7Š1994gÀAzÀÄ F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ ¥ÀnÖzÉ.
"Even though, the decision of the Supreme Court in Ramzan Kahn's case was rendered
about three years ago (1990) in some of the departments, including some of the Secretariat
Departments the disciplinary Authorities are passing final orders imposing penalties without
furnishing copies of the Inquiry Report to the delinquent Officer as contemplated by the said
decision of the Supreme Court. The Appellate Authorities also do not consider this aspect
while passing orders on appeals. If those delinquent Officers approach the Tribunal there is
no other go except to quash the orders of the disciplinary and appelate authority to pass
fresh orders. We have passed such orders in hundred of cases. In some of those cases,
the Government was either the Disciplinary Authority or the Appellate Authority. It is really
unfortunate that the Government Officers are not aware of this legal position even after three
years, which gives rise to avoidable litigation".
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ
£ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß, vÁ£ÉÃ ¸ÀévÀB £ÀqÉ¸À§ºÀÄzÁVzÉ
CxÀªÁ D ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß £ÉÃ«Ä¹ £ÀqÉ¸À§ºÀÄzÁVzÉ.
«ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁ£ÀÄ¸ÁgÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¹ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ
«ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß
M¦àPÉÆAqÀ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è CzÀ£ÀÄß DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀjUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹, CªÀjUÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÉÆlÄÖ
CªÀgÀ ºÉÃ½PÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ, vÀzÀ£ÀAvÀgÀ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ.
¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß M¥ÀàzÉ EzÀÝ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è vÁ£ÀÄ
«ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß KPÉ M¥Àà°è®è JA§ §UÉÎ ¸ÀàµÀÖªÁV £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹ DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ C¢üPÁj :
£ËPÀgÀgÀ ºÉÃ½PÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¹ vÀzÀ£ÀAvÀgÀ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÁVzÉ.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt. ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ
14 (J) ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ «gÀÄzÀÞ ªÀiÁ£Àå ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛjUÉ
¸ÀPÁðgÀ ªÀiÁvÀæªÉ vÀ¤SÉUÁV ªÀ»¹zÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è ªÀiÁ£Àå ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ: G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÁ
¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÉÃ«Ä¹zÀÄÝ DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÀgÀ¢ ºÁUÀÆ
¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ CxÀªÁ G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ ¤ÃrzÀ ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄìUÀ¼ÉÃ£ÁzÀgÀÆ EzÀÝ°è D ²¥sÁgÀ¸Àì£ÀÄß ¸ÀºÀ
PÉÆlÄÖ ºÉÃ½PÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ¨ÉÃPÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ°è «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼ÀAzÀ ªÀÄÄPÀÛ
ªÀiÁrzÀÝgÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß M¦à E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ°è DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß DgÉÆÃ¥À¢AzÀ ªÀÄÄPÀÛUÉÆ½¹ DzÉÃ±À ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÁUÀ CAvÀºÀ
¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ C¢üPÁj: £ËPÀgÀjUÉ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄªÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ
E®è.
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è ®WÀÄ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀiÁUÀ°, PÀpt zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÁßUÀ° «¢ü¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÁ
¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ C¢üPÁj:£ËPÀgÀgÀUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ PÀqÁØAiÀÄªÁVzÉ.
DzÀÝjAzÀ J¯Áè £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ C¦Ã®Ä ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ F
CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ£ÀzÀ°èlÄÖPÉÆAqÀÄ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÁð£ÀÄ¸ÁgÀ ¥Á°¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
PÀtÚ£ï PÀÄnÖ PÀÄ¼ÀÄ«¯ï
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated: 26.2.1994
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub: Unauthorised absence of Government employees instruction to deal with such
absence.
Ref: O.M. No. DPAR 4 SDE 89, dated 31.1.1989.
The consequences of unauthorised absence are spelt out under Rule 106-A of
Karnataka Civil Service Rules. Accordingly, unless leave is granted by the Competent
Authority, such Government Servant who absents himself from duty without leave will not
be entitled to any salary for the day/days of absence; the period of such absence shall be
debited to the account as though it were half-pay leave to the extent such leave is due and
as extra-ordinary leave to the extent the period of absence falls short of the half-pay leave
at credit. It is also provided that such unauthorised absence will render a Government
servant liable for disciplinary action for his conduct except where the Government servant
establishes to the satisfaction of the authority competent to sanction leave that he was
unable to join duty for reasons beyond his control.
According to Rule 108 of K.C.S. Rs, unless Government, in view of the special
circumstances of the case, determines otherwise, an officer who remains absent from duty
without leave for a period of four months or more may be liable to be dismissed or
removed from service after following the procedure laid down in the Karnataka Civil
Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957.
According to Rule 107 leave cannot be claimed as of right. Discretion is reserved to
the authority empowered to grant leave to refuse or revoke leave at any time according to
the exigencies of the Public Service.
While considering the case of repeated absence of a Government Servant, the
Karnataka Administrative Tribunal in Narasimharaju Vs. State and another (KSLJ
821/93) has held that such absence is a good ground to consider the applicant as unsuitable
for job. This judgement draws support from the judgement of Supreme Court in Samsher
Singh Vs. State of Punjab (1974) 2 SCC 831.
The instructions issued by Government in O.M. No. DPAR 4 SDE 89, dated
31.1.1989 that a Government Servant who returns after a spell of unauthorised absence
should be taken back to duty if in the meanwhile he was not removed from service after
holding an enquiry in accordance with rules are in keeping with the judgement of the
K.A.T in Dr. Changoli Vs. State and others (1989 KSLJ 1063).
The provision of Rules 106-A, 107,108 and 162 of KCSRs give adequate authority
to deal with unauthorised absence. If prompt action is taken as contemplated in these
rules, a situation where a Government Servant has to be taken back to duty even after
prolonged unauthorised absence can be avoided. Government therefore, have considered
it necessary to lay down the following guidelines for strictly enforcing the provisions of
the Rules and to deal with cases of unautorised absence or overstayal without proper
authority:
1) In all cases of unauthorised absence the competent authority should
immediately invoke the provisions of Rule 106-A of KCSRs. If this is
enforced there will be no occasion for a Government servant to unauthorisedly
absent himself even for shorter periods.
2) Where a Government Servant absents himself without prior sanction of leave,
the Disciplinary authority concerned should immediately issue a notice of
recall to duty. Where the notice is not responded to and the Government
Servant continues to be absent without intimation, it should be deemed that the
Government Servant has absconded and the Special Procedure prescribed for
dealing with such cases as under Rule 14 of the Karnataka Civil Services
(Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, should be invoked.
3) In the meanwhile the authority concerned should also examine why the
Government Servant should not be placed under suspension for unauthorised
absence.
4) Where the unauthorised absence exceeds four months the Appointing Authority
should immediately place the Government Servant under suspension. For this
purpose, the head of the Office or other competent authority under whose
jurisdiction, the Government Servant was working should send a report
promptly. Such report should be sent in all cases where the unauthorised
absence exceeds a period of 15 days. The disciplinary authority should also
immediately institute proceedings under Karnataka Civil Services
(Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules and consider the question of
removal or dismissal of the Government Servant under Rule 108 of KCSRs.
The Special procedure under Rule 14 of K.C.S (C.C.A) Rules could also be
invoked where the officer concerned has absconded, or where the officer
concerned does not take part in the Inquiry or where for any reasons to be
recorded in writing it is impracticable to communicate to him etc.
5) In such cases where the unauthorised absence is beyond 15 days, if the Head of
the Office or other authority fails to give intimation to the authority competent
to take disciplinary action, such Head of the Office or other authority to give
information of the unauthorised absence will be personally held responsible.
Similarly, where the appointing authority or the disciplinary authority as the
case may be fails to keep the Government Servant under suspension
immediately after expiry of four months of unauthorised absence, the
appointing authority or the disciplinary authority as the case may be shall be
personally held responsible for this lapse. They would incur similar liability
for failure to take suitable proceedings under Rule 108 of KCSRs for removal /
dismissal of Government Servant immediately after expiry of the period of four
months of unauthorised absence.
The Secretaries to Government and Heads of Departments should bring these
guidelines to the notice of all authorities concerned and ensure prompt action in dealing
with cases of unauthorised absence.
sd/-
J.C. Lynn
¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 4 J¸ïrE 95. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä EgÀÄªÀ
G¯ÉèÃR : ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 35 J¸ïrE 86 ¢£ÁAPÀ : 7.1.1987.
G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ M¼À¥ÀqÀ°gÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ M¼À¥ÀnÖgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À PÁ®zÀ «ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀzÉÃ CzÀ£ÀÄß
«ÄÃj CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä
C£ÀÄPÀÆ®ªÁUÀ®Ä CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ²ð¹ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ²¥sÁgÀ¸Àì£ÀÄß ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ
C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¸À¯ÁVvÀÄÛ. (¥Àæw ®UÀwÛ¹zÉ.)
1) C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð Š CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ
2) ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, DqÀ½vÀ Š ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ
E¯ÁSÉ, (£ËPÀgÀgÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À
3) C¥ÀgÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄ) (C¥ÀgÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
§zÀ¯ÁV G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð). Š ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ.
¥ÀgÁªÀÄ±ÀðPÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä CºÀðªÁzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß CzÀgÀ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä
¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀæªÀÄ PÉÊUÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVvÀÄÛ. »ÃUÉ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÀÝgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ F ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄwÛ®èªÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ
UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÉ.
DzÀÝjAzÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÉÄÃ°£À ¸ÀPÁðj
DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À CªÀ¢ü «ÄÃjzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß F ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ
ªÀÄvÉÆÛªÉÄä PÉÆÃjzÉ.
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ) ±ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀåªÀºÀj¸À®àqÀÄªÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ½UÉ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ C£Àé¬Ä¸ÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.
¸À»/Š

¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 35 J¸ïrE 86, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ,
¢£ÁAPÀ 7£ÉÃ d£ÀªÀj 1987.
«µÀAiÀÄ : CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
G¯ÉèÃR : C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 13 J¸ïrE 85 ¢£ÁAPÀ 3.7.1985.
G¯ÉèÃTvÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è, AiÀiÁªÀ AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ
§ºÀÄzÀÄ, ¥ÀÆªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉ : E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄä £ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀÄªÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è JµÀÄÖ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄªÀgÉ«UÉ D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ
ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀ «µÀAiÀÄUÀ¼À£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆAqÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. ºÁUÀÆ £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ PÉ®ªÀÅ GUÀæªÁzÀ
D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ½UÉ FqÁVgÀÄªÀ D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è »ÃUÉ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ
PÁ¯ÁªÀ¢üUÉ CAnPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀ¢gÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ÄÃj CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À§ºÀÄzÉÃ JA§ÄzÀgÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß
¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. EAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ DzÉÃ±ÀPÉÌ
ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä ¥ÀÄ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¹ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ²¥sÁgÀ¸Àì£ÀÄß ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä MAzÀÄ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¸ÀÄªÀ
«µÀAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß PÀÆ®APÀÄµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ.
DzÉÃ±À
E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ M¼À¥ÀqÀ°gÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ M¼À¥ÀnÖgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è
¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À PÁ¯ÁªÀ¢üUÉ CAnPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀzÉ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ÄÃj CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß
ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä C£ÀÄPÀÆ®ªÁUÀ®Ä
CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ²ð¹ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ²¥sÁgÀ¸Àì£ÀÄß ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆAqÀ
¥ÀgÁªÀÄ±ÀðPÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¸À¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ.
1) C¥ÁgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð - CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ
2) ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, DqÀ½vÀ - ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ
E¯ÁSÉ, (£ËPÀgÀgÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ)
3) C¥ÀgÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ - ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄ)
2. ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ±ÀðPÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä CºÀðªÁzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀzÀj ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ
ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ. ºÁUÀÆ
¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä GzÉÝÃ²¹zÀ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆAqÀ n¥ÀàtÂAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ J¯Áè ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀåjUÉ ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀQÌAvÀ MAzÀÄ ªÁgÀQÌAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ¬Ä®èzÀ CªÀ¢üVAvÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä
MzÀV¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
3. ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
ªÀåªÀºÀj¸ÀÄªÀ ¸ÀºÀ : G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀÄ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÁV PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÀð»¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ EAvÀºÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ. ºÁUÀÆ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ
ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä GzÉÝÃ²¹zÀ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆAqÀ n¥ÀàtÂAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ J¯Áè
¸ÀzÀ¸ÀåjUÉ MzÀV¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
4. ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ) ªÀåªÀºÀj¸À®àqÀÄªÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ½UÉ
F DzÉÃ±ÀªÀÅ C£Àé¬Ä¸ÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀÄ¸ÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
©.PÉ. ¸ÀAUÉÆÃgÁªÀÄ,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üÃ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ
¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ, (¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ).
¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 1 J¸ïrE 95. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ :15Š3Š1995.
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ.
G¯ÉèÃR : 1. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 13 J¸ïrE : 85, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 3Š7Š85.
2. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 22 J¸ïDgïDgï : 93, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 14Š7Š93.
G¯ÉèÃTvÀ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå (1)gÀ°è£À C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ AiÀiÁªÀ
¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è JµÀÄÖ PÁ¯ÁªÀ¢üAiÀÄªÀgÉUÉ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛUÉÆ½¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ JA§ §UÉÎ PÉ®ªÉÇAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
G¯ÉèÃTvÀ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå (2)gÀ°è£À C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉ CxÀªÁ £ÁåAiÀiÁAUÀ «ZÁgÀuÉ ¨ÁQ EzÀÝ°è, CAvÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ §rÛ ¤ÃqÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß
¥Àj²Ã°¸ÀÄªÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ, E¯ÁSÁ §rÛ ¥Àj²Ã®£Á ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄÄ C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄzÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ PÉ®ªÉÇAzÀÄ
ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
F »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è ¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š7Š85gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ PÀArPÉŠ5gÀ°è£À ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁvÀæ
»AvÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¯ÁVzÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀzÀj C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è E£ÁßªÀÅzÉÃ §zÀ¯ÁªÀuÉ EgÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.
PÀtÚ£ï PÀÄnÖ PÀÄ¼Á«¯ï,

¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 6 ¸ÉÃE« 95. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ :16Š3Š1995.
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ:¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è
«¼ÀA§Š«¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
2. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 8 J¸ïrE : 85, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 30Š12Š86.
3. DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 35 J¸ïrE : 86, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 7Š1Š87.
4. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 14 J¸ïrE : 88, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 30Š8Š88.
5. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 23 ¸ÉÃE« : 89, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 19Š9Š89.
6. ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 4 J¸ïrE : 85, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 21Š2Š95.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ AiÀiÁªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛUÉÆ½¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ, JµÀÄÖ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄªÀgÉUÉ
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À§ºÀÄzÉA§ §UÉÎ Ew«ÄwUÀ¼À PÀÄjvÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š7Š85gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è
¸ÀàµÀÖ¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
(2) ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ««zsÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À°è ºÀt zÀÄgÀÄ¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀ, C¥À«¤AiÉÆÃUÀPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹gÀÄªÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ºÀÆrgÀÄªÀ ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉ, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ, CAwªÀÄ DzÉÃ±À, ºÉZÉÑAzÀgÉ MAzÀÄ
ªÀµÀðzÀ°è CxÀªÁ QèµÀÖªÁzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è UÀjµÀ× 15 wAUÀ¼À°è ¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ½¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃTvÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ 30Š12Š86gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
(3) PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ
10 (6)gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ §AzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹ vÀéjvÀ ¤zsÁðgÀ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä G¯ÉèÃTvÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ 7Š1Š87gÀ DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ CzsÀåPÀëvÉAiÀÄ°è MAzÀÄ
¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¸À¯ÁVzÉ. ¸ÀzÀj ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ PÁ®«Äw «ÄÃjzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä
G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 21Š2Š1995gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÀÄZÀáj¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
(4) ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À°è ¢ÃWÀðPÁ®¢AzÀ ¨ÁQ EgÀÄªÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÁ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß E¯ÁSÁ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ MnÖUÉ ¸ÉÃj ¥Àæw 3
wAUÀ½UÉÆªÉÄäAiÀiÁzÀgÀÆ ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ ºÁUÀÆ vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢vÀ £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉAiÀÄ°è
CAzÀgÉ ¤AiÀÄvÀPÁ°PÀªÁV dÄ¯ÉÊ 20 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ d£ÀªÀj 20gÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä, ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ
E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ)AiÀÄ ±ÁSÉUÉ PÉÆæÃrüÃPÀj¹zÀ C£ÀÄ¸ÀgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ 30Š8Š1988gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀàµÀÖªÁV ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
(5) ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÃ½gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ : ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Á°¸ÀzÉ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ:E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À C£ÀUÀvÀå «¼ÀA§PÉÌ PÁgÀtgÁzÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀévÀB vÁªÉÃ vÀ¤SÉUÉ
M¼À¥ÀqÀ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄªÀÅzÉAzÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è JZÀÑjPÉ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
(6) »ÃVzÁÝUÀÆå ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ««zsÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è C£ÀUÀvÀåªÁV «¼ÀA§ªÁUÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ªÀÄ£ÀUÀArzÉ. CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀjAzÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ PÉ®¸ÀªÀ£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîzÉ fÃªÀ£ÁzsÁgÀ ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀ
¤ÃqÀ¨ÉÃPÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
(7) DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À°è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÉëÃvÀæ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À°è ««zsÀ ¤®A§£Á ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À
CAzÀgÉ, Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ, ºÀtPÁ¹£À zÀÄªÀåðªÀºÁgÀ, ¸ÀPÁðj ¤zÉðÃ±À£ÀUÀ¼À G®èAWÀ£É EvÁå¢
«µÀAiÀÄUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖAvÉ ¨ÁQ G½¢gÀÄªÀ J¯Áè CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ:PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ¸ÀªÀiÁ¯ÉÆÃa¹ ôF «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä
¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ PÀlÄÖ¤nÖ£À ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
(8) ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ:PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, vÀªÀÄä E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ
ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ C£ÀÄ¸ÀgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÉÃgÀªÁV ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄRå
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, EªÀjUÉ vÀ¥ÀàzÉ ¸À°è¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
¸À»/÷Š
PÀtÚ£ï PÀÄnÖ PÀÄ¼Á«¯ï,
¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 17 ¸ÉÃE« 95 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 28Š10Š95.
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä EgÀÄªÀ
2. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 35 J¸ïrE : 86, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 7Š1Š87.
3. ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 4 J¸ïrE : 95, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 21Š2Š95.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ AiÀiÁªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛUÉÆ½¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ, JµÀÄÖ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄªÀgÉUÉ
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À§ºÀÄzÉA§ §UÉÎ G¯ÉèÃR (1)gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è PÉ®ªÉÇAzÀÄ
ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ CªÀ¢ü DgÀÄ wAUÀ½UÀÆ «Æj «¸ÀÛj¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§ PÁ¯ÁªÀ¢ü PÉÆÃgÀÄªÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀ UÉÆvÀÄÛ¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ±ÀðPÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ n¥ÀàtÂAiÉÆA¢UÉ
ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ ºÁUÀÆ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ J¯Áè ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀåjUÉ ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀQÌAvÀ MAzÀÄªÁgÀ PÀrªÉÄ E®èzÀ
CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è D n¥ÀàtÂAiÀÄ£ÀÄß MzÀV¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ ««zsÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ½UÉ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå
(2)gÀ DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
3. G¯ÉèÃTvÀ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå (3)gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è ¢£ÁAPÀ 7Š1Š87gÀ DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ°è£À ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¥ÀÅ£ÀgÀÄZÀáj¸À¯ÁVzÉ. DzÁUÀÆå ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ PÉ®ªÀÅ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ F jÃwAiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ±ÀðPÀ
¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÀ §zÀ®Ä £ÉÃgÀªÁV ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÁ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ)UÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÀÄÝ, ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è CAwªÀÄ ¤tðAiÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ°è
C£ÀUÀvÀå «¼ÀA§ªÁUÀÄwÛzÉ.
4. DzÀÝjAzÀ, ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ J¯Áè E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ vÀªÀÄä E¯ÁSÉUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖAvÉ ¤UÀ¢vÀ PÁ®«Äw
«Æj CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ CªÀ¢ü «¸ÀÛj¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ±ÀðPÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ £ÉÃgÀªÁV
ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀÄªÀAvÉ DAiÀiÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ C¥ÀgÀ : ¸ÀºÀ : G¥ÀPÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼À ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è
C¢üPÁjAiÉÆ§âgÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÀiÁªÉÃ±ÀPÀgÀ£ÁßV (convenor) : ¸ÀzÀ¸Àå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ£ÁßV PÁAiÀÄð
¤ªÀð»¸À®Ä; £ÁªÀÄ ¤zÉðÃ²¸À®Ä PÉÆÃgÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
5. ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ±ÀðPÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ
ªÀÄÄRåPÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ PÁAiÀiÁð®AiÀÄzÉÆA¢UÉ ¸ÀªÀiÁ¯ÉÆÃa¹ ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀgÉAiÀÄ®Ä ¤UÀ¢vÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÃ¼ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ«AiÀiÁVAiÉÄÃ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤zsÀðj¹PÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
E£ÀÄß½zÀAvÉ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À°è AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ §zÀ¯ÁªÀuÉ¬ÄgÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.
¸À»/÷Š
J.PÉ.JA. £ÁAiÀÄPï,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ,
1957gÀrAiÀÄ°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼ÀÄ.
G¯ÉèÃR : 1. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : fJr (MDgï) 3 ¹JDgï : 57 : ¢£ÁAPÀ : 14Š12Š1957.
2. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : fJr : 171 : J¸ïJ£ïDgï : 65 : ¢ : 2Š2Š1966.
3. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : fJr : 26 : J¸ïJ¸ïDgï : 72 : ¢ : 23Š6Š1972.
4. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï : 24 : J¸ïJ¸ïDgï : 78, ¢ : dÄ¯ÉÊ 1978.
5. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï : 10 : J¸ïrE : 82, ¢ : 19Š4Š1982.
6. ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï : 14 : J¸ïrE : 85, ¢ : 5Š7Š1985.
7. ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE : 6 : J¸ïrE : 91, ¢ : 21Š3Š1992.
8. ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE : 12 : ¸ÉÃE« : 94,¢ : 7Š12Š1994.
«ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ : ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ¤®ðPÀë¢AzÁV C£ÉÃPÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÁ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ : C¢üPÁjUÉ
PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀzÉÃ EgÀÄªÀÅzÀjAzÀ, ¥ÀjuÁªÀÄPÁjAiÀiÁV zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄÄ eÁjAiÀiÁUÀÄwÛ®èªÉAzÀÆ, EAvÀºÀ PÉ®ªÉÇAzÀÄ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
2. F jÃw E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ «¥sÀ®vÉUÉ PÁgÀtgÁUÀÄªÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁj : ²¸ÀÄÛ
¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄPÉÌ M¼À¥Àr¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ F ¸ÀA§AzsÀzÀ°è ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ
«µÀAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀ ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÉ.
3. G¯ÉèÃR (1) jAzÀ (8) gÀªÀgÉUÉ G¯ÉèÃT¹gÀÄªÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À : ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À°è E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ°è C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
4. C£ÉÃPÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£É : ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¹zÁÝUÀÆå PÀÆqÁ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ
²¸ÀÄÛ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀt£ÉUÉ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîzÉÃ EgÀÄªÀ
ºÀ®ªÁgÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÀÄÝ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ EzÀ£ÀÄß UÀA©üÃgÀªÁV ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¹zÉ. DzÀÝjAzÀ, E£ÀÄß
ªÀÄÄAzÉ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ªÀÄvÉÆÛªÀÄä ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Á°¸ÀzÉÃ EgÀÄªÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ°è£À
¥sÀ°vÁA±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjuÁªÀÄPÁjAiÀiÁV eÁjUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀ°è «¥sÀ®gÁUÀÄªÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ
¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄPÉÌ M¼À¥Àr¸À¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ JZÀÑj¹zÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
J¸ï.©. ªÀÄÄzÀÝ¥Àà
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 23Š11Š95
«µÀAiÀÄ : E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
G¯ÉèÃR : 1. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 8 J¸ïrE 85, ¢£ÁAPÀ 30Š12Š1986.
2. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 14 J¸ïrE 88, ¢£ÁAPÀ 30Š8Š1988.
3. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : ¹ÇÀÄE 6 ¸ÉÃE« 95, ¢£ÁAPÀ 16Š3Š1995.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ºÀtzÀ zÀÄgÀÄ¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀ, C¥À«¤AiÉÆÃUÀ, Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄUÀ¼ÀÄ,
¨sÀæµÁÖZÁgÀzÀ CgÉÆÃ¥À, zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ ºÁUÀÆ PÀvÀðªÀå ¤®ðPÀëvÉ ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀ ºÀ®ªÀÅ CgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ½AzÁV C£ÉÃPÀ
E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ EvÁå¢UÀ¼ÀÄ ¨ÁQ EgÀÄvÀÛªÉ. ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ºÀÆrgÀÄªÀ ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉ
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼ÀÄ vÀéjvÀUÀw¬ÄAzÀ CgÀA©ü¸ÀzÉ ¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ¼ÀîzÉ ªÀµÀðUÀlÖ¯É ¨ÁQ G½¢gÀÄªÀ
«µÀAiÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÉ. EAvÀºÀ «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß ¤ªÁj¸À®Ä F ªÀÄÄA¢£ÀAvÉ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ :Š
(J) ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À CPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ:zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §AzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ
ªÀÄÆgÀÄ wAUÀ¼ÉÆ¼ÀUÁV CAvÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
eÁjUÉÆ½¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ ºÁUÀÆ ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀjµÀ× 15 wAUÀ¼ÉÆ¼ÀUÁV CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
(©) DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ DgÉÆÃ¥À ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¹éÃPÀøvÀªÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ
PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±À, GzÁºÀgÀuÉUÉ 15 ¢£ÀUÀ¼À M¼ÀUÁV °TvÀ ºÉÃ½PÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ
DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ °TvÀ ºÉÃ½PÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¸À®Ä ºÉaÑUÉ PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÉÆÃjzÀ°è,
E£ÀÄß 15 ¢£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ «ÄÃgÀzÀAvÉ ºÉaÑ£À PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ.
(¹) CPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ:zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ, AiÀiÁªÁUÀ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §AzÀªÀÅ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ JAzÀÄ gÀÆ¦¸À¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ; EvÁå¢ CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
M¼ÀUÉÆAqÀAvÉ MAzÀÄ £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß EzÀgÉÆA¢UÉ ®UÀwÛ¸À¯ÁVzÉ. F £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉAiÀÄ°è
vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀªÁV ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üÃ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CqÀ½vÀ
¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄŠ2) EªÀjUÉ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ J¯Áè E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ vÀ¥ÀàzÉ
ªÀiÁZïð, dÆ£ï, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ r¸ÉA§gï CAvÀåUÉÆAqÀAvÉ C£ÀÄPÀæªÀÄªÁV K¦æ¯ï 20,
dÄ¯ÉÊ 20, CPÉÆÖÃ§gï 20 ºÁUÀÆ d£ÀªÀj 20gÉÆ¼ÀUÁV PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ:PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ F
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ZÁZÀÆ vÀ¥ÀàzÉ ¥Á°¸À®Ä ªÀÄvÀÄÛ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ J¯Áè ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À
UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀ®Ä PÉÆÃjzÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
J.PÉ.JA. £ÁAiÀÄPï
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
C£ÀÄ§AzsÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ : jAzÀ gÀªÀgÉUÉ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è£À ²¹Û£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À «ªÀgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ : ........................................................................
PÉëÃvÀæ PÀæªÀÄ DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ CPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ: ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁj «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß µÀgÁ
E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå ¸ÀPÁðj zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉUÀ¼ÀÄ vÀ¤SÉ ¸ÀPÁðj «gÀÄzÀÞ ºÁUÀÆ ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ «¢ü¹zÀÝ°è
ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ £ËPÀgÀ£À:¼À ²¹Û£À CgÀA©ü¹zÀÝ°è £ËPÀgÀgÀ «ªÀgÀuÉ ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁj ºÀAvÀ CzÀgÀ «ªÀgÀ
ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ CzÀ£ÀÄß «gÀÄzÀÞ ¤ÃqÀ®Ä UÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÉ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ CgÀA©ü¹zÀ zÉÆÃµÁ DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ £ÉÃ«Ä¹zÀ ªÀÄÄV¢zÀÝ°è «¢ü¸ÀzÉÃ
CzÀ£ÀÄß ¢£ÁAPÀ gÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ ¸ÀPÁðj ¢£ÁAPÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ EzÀ°è
ªÀÄÄV¹zÀÝ°è ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ ¥ÀnÖ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É ªÀgÀ¢
ªÀÄÄV¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ (CnðPÀ¯ïì vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀ ¸À°è¹zÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ PÁ®«Äw PÀæªÀÄzÀ ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ PÁgÀt
ºÀAvÀ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 9 ¸ÉÃE« 96, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 22Š6Š96.
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¹.D.¸ÀÄ. E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ «¨sÁUÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄð ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ «¨sÁUÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ
¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À PÁ¯ÁªÀ¢üUÉ
CAnPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀzÉÃ, D CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ÄÃj CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀj¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¥ÀgÁªÀÄ²ð¹, ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄì ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä, F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ²ðPÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
gÀa¸À¯ÁVzÉ:Š
1. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð Š CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ
2. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð Š ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ
3. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, ¹D¸ÀÄE Š ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ
4. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ G¥ÀPÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð (¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ) Š ¸ÀAZÁ®PÀgÀÄ
¹.D.¸ÀÄ.E.
2. ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ±ÀðPÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CqÀ½vÀ
¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ «¨sÁUÀzÀrAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ ±ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ.
¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä GzÉÝÃ²¹zÀ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆAqÀ n¥ÀàtÂAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀåjUÉ ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀQÌAvÀ MAzÀÄ ªÁgÀQÌAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ¬Ä®èzÀ CªÀ¢üVAvÀ
ªÉÆzÀ®Ä MzÀV¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
3. ¸ÀzÀj ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ¸ÀAZÁ®PÀgÀÄ, CzÀgÀ ¸À¨sÉUÀ¼À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹, ªÀÄÄRå ªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÀªÀgÀ
C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉUÁV ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
PÉ.J¯ï. dAiÀÄgÁªÀiï
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üÃ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðŠ2,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ M¼À¥ÀlÖ C¥ÀgÁzsÀPÁÌV zÀAqÀ£ÉUÉ UÀÄjAiÀiÁzÀ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆa.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ
14(1)gÀ£ÀÄ¸ÁgÀ, ¸ÀzÀj ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 11,12 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 13gÀ°è K£ÉÃ ºÉÃ¼À¯ÁVzÀÝgÀÆ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï
£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è Qæ«Ä£À¯ï DgÉÆÃ¥ÀPÁÌV zÉÆÃµÀ¹¢ÞAiÀiÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£ÀB E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ
M¼À¥Àr¸ÀzÉAiÉÄÃ ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ ªÀeÁ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ CxÀªÁ vÉUÉzÀÄ ºÁPÀÄªÀ CxÀªÁ PÉ¼ÀzÀeÉðUÉ E½¸ÀÄªÀ
zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÁVzÉ. F ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ CªÀPÁ±ÀªÀÅ, ¸ÀA«zsÁ£ÀzÀ C£ÀÄZÉáÃzÀ 311 (2)gÀ ¨ÉA§®
¥ÀqÉ¢zÉ.
2. MAzÀÄ ªÉÃ¼É, Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è zÀAqÀ£ÉUÉÆ¼ÀUÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ D £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ
vÀ£ÀUÉ «¢ü¹zÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀªÀÄxÀð £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ªÉÄÃ®ä£À« ¸À°è¹, PÉ¼ÀV£À £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ
zÀAqÀ£Á DzÉÃ±ÀPÉÌ vÀqÉAiÀiÁeÕÉ ¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÁUÀ¯ÁUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ ªÉÊAiÀÄQÛPÀ eÁ«Æ¤£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ©qÀÄUÀqÉ
DzÉÃ±À ¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÁUÀ¯ÁUÀ°Ã, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä)
¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 14 (i)gÀ CªÀPÁ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß eÁjUÉÆ½¸À§ºÀÄzÁzÀ ¸ÁzsÀåvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÉÇðÃZÀá
£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ PÁ¯ÉÃdÄ ²PÀët G¥À¤zÉðÃ±ÀPÀgÀÄ (DqÀ½vÀ) ªÀÄzÁæ¸ï «gÀÄzÀÞ J¸ï. £ÀUÀÆgÀ «ÄÃgÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è (JLDgï 1995 J¸ï¹ 1364) ¤ÃrgÀÄªÀ wÃ¦ð£À ¨É¼ÀQ£À°è ¥Àj²Ã°¹ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ F
PÉ¼ÀPÉAqÀAvÉ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÉ.
3. ¸ÀA«zsÁ£ÀzÀ C£ÀÄZÉáÃzÀ 311(2)gÀrAiÀÄ°è£À JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ ¥ÀgÀAvÀÄPÀzÀ RAqÀ (Clause) (J)AiÀÄÄ

``Qæ«Ä£À¯ï DgÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É zÉÆÃµÀ¹¢ÞAiÀiÁUÀÄªÀAvÉ ªÀiÁrzÀ £ÀqÀvÉAiÀÄ §UÉÎ ºÉÃ¼ÀÄvÀÛzÉAiÀiÁzÀÝjAzÀ
zÉÆÃµÀ¹¢ÞAiÀiÁVgÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß ¤®A§£ÀzÀ°èqÀÄªÀ ¥Àæ±Éß GzÀã«¸ÀÄªÀÅ¢®è. DzÀÝjAzÀ, D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À« ¸À°è¹zÁÝ£É CxÀªÁ EvÀgÀ ªÀåªÀºÀgÀuÉ
ºÀÆrzÁÝ£É; CxÀªÁ ªÉÄÃ°£À £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ zÀAqÀ£É DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß
¤®A§£ÉAiÀÄ°ènÖzÉ, CxÀªÁ DvÀ£À ªÉÄÃ®ä£À« EvÀåxÀðzÀ°ègÀÄªÁUÀ eÁ«Æ¤£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ©qÀÄUÀqÉ ¥ÀqÉ¢zÁÝ£É''
JA§ PÁgÀtPÁÌV PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 1957gÀ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 14(1)gÀ£ÀÄ¸ÁgÀ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉ »rAiÀÄ¨ÉÃPÁzÀ CUÀvÀå«®è. EAvÀºÀ J¯Áè
¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀÆPÀÛªÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄ JAzÀgÉ, MªÉÄä M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉUÉ
UÀÄjAiÀiÁzÀgÉ, DvÀ£ÀÄ ¸À°è¹gÀ§ºÀÄzÁzÀ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À« EvÀåxÀðªÁUÀÄªÀªÀgÉUÀÆ PÁAiÀÄzÉ ¸ÀA«zsÁ£ÀzÀ C£ÀÄZÉáÃzÀ
311(2)gÀrAiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ ¥ÀgÀAvÀÄPÀzÀ ¸ÀªÀÄxÀð£É ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀÄªÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt,
¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ D¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 14(i) gÀ£ÀÄ¸ÁgÀ ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ PÉÊUÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
E®èªÁzÀ°è, Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è wÃªÀæ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀPÁÌV zÉÆÃµÀ¹¢ÞAiÀiÁV zÀAqÀ£ÉUÉ UÀÄjAiÀiÁzÀAvÀºÀ
ªÀåQÛAiÀÄÄ ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀjAiÀÄ®Ä CªÀPÁ±À PÀ°à¹zÀAvÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. CzÀÝjAzÀ, ªÉÄÃ®ä£À« CzÉÃ±ÀªÀÅ
EvÀåxÀðªÁUÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß PÁAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀÆPÀÛªÀ®è. CzÀgÉ, MAzÀÄ ªÉÃ¼É D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ªÉÄÃ°£À
£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è RÄ¯Á¸É (acquit) AiÀiÁzÀgÉ, ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjµÀÌj¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ. MAzÀÄ
ªÉÃ¼É ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£ÀB ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀ°è, DvÀ£ÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀj¢zÀÝgÉ
CºÀð£ÁVgÀÄwÛzÀÝAxÀ J®è ¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ½UÀÆ ºÀPÀÄÌ¼ÀîªÀ£ÁUÀÄvÁÛ£É.
4. DzÀÝjAzÀ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ, vÀªÀÄä

C¢üÃ£ÀzÀ°è §gÀÄªÀ J¯Áè £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀgÀ®Ä PÉÆÃjzÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÉ
ªÀ»¹zÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀt ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¤ªÀøwÛ ªÀAiÀÄ¸Àì£ÀÄß
£ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÉ «ZÁgÀuÁ
¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÉÃ«Ä¸À®Ä ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÆÃj PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄwÛzÀÄÝ, ²¸ÀÄÛ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÉ F
jÃw ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¤ªÀøwÛ ªÀAiÀÄ¸ÀÄì £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ
¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀA¢zÁÝgÉ.
2. CzÀÝjAzÀ, J¯Áè ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÉ E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj C¢üPÁj:£ËPÀgÀgÀ ¤ªÀøwÛ ªÀAiÀÄ¸Àì£ÀÄß PÀqÁØAiÀÄªÁV
vÀ¥ÀàzÉÃ £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ PÉÆÃjzÉ.
¸À»/Š
No. DPAR 4 SDE 96 Karnataka Government Secretariat,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, dated : 28.8.96.
CIRCULAR
Sub: Avoiding delay in initiating department enquiries-Instructions-Regarding.
Ref: 1. O.M.No. DPAR 13 SDE 85, dated 3.7.85
2. O.M.No. DPAR 8 SDE 85, dated 30.12.86.
3. G.O.No. DPAR 35 SDE 86, dated 7.1.87.
6. Circular No. DPAR 4 SDE 95, dated 21.2.95.
In the Official Memoranda referred to at (1) to (7) above, instructions/guidelines
have been issued for expenditious disposal of pending enquiries against Government
Servant who are facing charges of misconduct such as negligence/dereliction of duty, mis-
appropriation, defalcation, corruption etc.,
2. In the Official Memorandum dated 23.11.1995, referred to at (8) above, instructions
have been issued to the effect that wherever instances of such irregularities/misconduct of
Government Servants come to the notice of disciplinary authorities, they should take
action to serve the charge memos/statements, of imputations of misconduct on the
concerned, within three months.
3. Inspite of it, in a case, involving a retired officer, disciplinary action was not initiated
promptly so as to be within the time limit stipulated in Rule 214 (1) (b) (ii) of K.C.S. Rs,
as a result of which it was not possible to initiate the same. It has also been the experience
of Government that, in some cases, proposals for holding disciplinary proceedings against
Government Servants are sent to Government (with details of the alleged misconduct
committed) just two or three days before the date of retirement of the Government
servants concerned.
4. In the circumstances explained in para 3 above, it is once again reiterated that as
soon as the alleged misconduct committed by a Government servant comes to notice, the
same should be intimated to the disciplinary authority concerned. As for Government
servants who are due to retire, such information should be sent to the disciplinary
authorities concerned along with draft articles of charges etc. together with the connected
documents, at least, two or three months before they are due to retire.
5. It has also come to the notice of Government that complaints against Government
Servants are simply forwarded to the concerned disciplinary authorities / Government to
take sutitable action. This is not correct. The officers concerned should conduct a
preliminary enquiry to find out the truth of such complaints and only if there is a prima-
facie case for holding an enquiry should the connected papers be sent to the disciplinary
authority / Government along with draft articles of charges etc. for holding a departmental
enquiry. In respect of the accused Government servants, who are due to retire shortly, the
date of their retirement should invariably be mentioned without fail; while forwarding
their papers to the disciplinary authorities concerned.
6. All the Principal Secretaries and Secretaries to Government are requested to bring
these instructions to the notice of all the concerned.
Sd/-
K.L. JAYARAM,
Under Secretary to
Government.-II,
Department of Personnel &
Administrative Reforms,
(Service Rules)
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18Š2Š97.
«µÀAiÀÄ : PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ,
1957gÀ C£ÀÄ¸ÀÆaŠI, II, III, IV PÉÌ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr PÀÄjvÀÄ.
¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 125 ED¸ÀÄ 95, ¢£ÁAPÀ 16Š1Š97gÀ DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ°è
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ) ±ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ
C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß CUÀvÀå«zÀÝ°è ¥ÀÅ£Àgï CªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¹, CUÀvÀå PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä
DzÉÃ²¹zÉ. F »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä)
¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ C£ÀÄ¸ÀÆaŠ I, II, III, ºÁUÀÆ IV PÉÌ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¨ÉÃPÁVzÉ.
2. DzÀÝjAzÀ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ:PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, vÀªÀÄä DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ
ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ J¯Áè E¯ÁSÉUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖAvÉ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ C£ÀÄ¸ÀÆaUÀ½UÉ K£ÁzÀgÀÆ
wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÉ? ¨ÉÃqÀªÉÃ? JA§ §UÉÎ w½¸À®Ä PÉÆÃjzÉ. ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀzÀj
C£ÀÄ¸ÀÆaUÉ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr CUÀvÀåªÉAzÀÄ GzÉÝÃ²¹zÀ°è, ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÉ ¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶ n¥ÀàtÂAiÀÄ£ÀÄß MzÀV¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À ¸ÉÃ¥ÀðqÉ ªÀiÁrzÀ°è CxÀªÁ PÉÊ©lÖ°è CzÀPÉÌ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß MzÀV¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. F ¢¸ÉAiÀÄ°è
DzÉÃ±À:¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ EzÀÝ°è, CªÀÅUÀ¼À ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ EwÛÃa£À ªÀøAzÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw
¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß MzÀV¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. ºÁUÀÆ C£ÀÄ¸ÀÆaUÉ wzÀÄÝ¥ÀrAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C£ÀÄ¸ÀÆaŠ II ªÀÄvÀÄÛ III PÉÌ
¤UÀ¢üvÀ £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉAiÀÄ°è DAUÀè ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀ£ÀßqÀ ¨sÁµÉUÀ¼À°è vÀAiÀiÁj¹ ¢é¥ÀæwUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ
¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ) ±ÁSÉUÉ MAzÀÄ wAUÀ¼ÉÆ¼ÀUÁV PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ PÉÆÃjzÉ.
3. GzÉÝÃ²vÀ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ E¯ÁSÁ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£É ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ ¸À°è¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
4. ¸ÀzÀj C£ÀÄ¸ÀÆaUÀ½UÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr CUÀvÀå E®èªÉAzÀÄ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ ¥ÀlÖ°è, F §UÉÎ ``±ÀÆ£Àå''
ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀºÀ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À®Ä w½¹zÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¤®A§£ÉAiÀÄ°èqÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ
G¯ÉèÃR : 1. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 13 J¸ïrE 85, ¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š7Š1985 (£ÀAvÀgÀzÀ
C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå:r¦JDgï 1 J¸ïrE 95, ¢£ÁAPÀ 15Š3Š1995gÉÆA¢UÉ
N¢PÉÆAqÀAvÉ)
2. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 16 £ÉÃE« 89, ¢£ÁAPÀ 26Š6Š89.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¤®A§£É ºÁUÀÆ CªÀgÀ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀzÀ §UÉÎ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÉÄÃ¯É
(1)gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š7Š85gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ®AZÀ ¤ªÀÄÆð®£Á C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ CrAiÀÄ¯ÁèUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ E£ÁßªÀÅzÉÃ «µÀAiÀÄPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ
vÀ¤SÉUÉ M¼ÀUÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß, CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°ègÀÄªÀAvÉ §gÀÄªÀ ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄìUÀ¼À£ÀÄß, ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ
DVAzÁUÉÎ ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉAiÀÄrAiÀÄ°è ¥Àj²Ã°¹, vÀzÀ£ÀAvÀgÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À §UÉUÉ ¤tðAiÀÄ
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀAvÉ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå (2)gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀàµÀÖ¥Àr¹zÉ.
3. DzÀÝjAzÀ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð : PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ,
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¤®A§£ÉAiÀÄ°èqÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ DVAzÁUÉÎ
ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ£ÀzÀ°èlÄÖPÉÆAqÀÄ ¤tð¬Ä¸À®Ä vÀªÀÄä ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀÆa¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ ªÀÄvÉÆÛªÉÄä PÉÆÃjzÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : C£À¢üPÀøvÀ UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¸ÀÄÛPÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR : 1. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 13 J¸ïrE 85, ¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š7Š85.
2. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 3 J¸ïrE 94, ¢£ÁAPÀ 26Š2Š94.
ªÉÄÃ¯É (1)gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹gÀÄªÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ AiÀiÁªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ JA§ §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ªÉÄÃ¯É (2)gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¸À¯ÁzÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è, C£À¢üPÀøvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdgÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¸ÀÄÛPÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ «ªÀgÀªÁzÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
3. F jÃw ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÁÝUÀÆå PÀÆqÀ, C£À¢üPÀøvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdgÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É
¥ÀjuÁªÀÄPÁjAiÀiÁV ²¸ÀÄÛPÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀPÁ®zÀ°è dgÀÄV¸ÀzÉÃ E®è¢gÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÉ.
4. DzÀÝjAzÀ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ:PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ:E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ,
C£À¢üPÀøvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV
PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¥ÀÅ£ÀB MwÛ ºÉÃ¼À¯ÁVzÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 31£ÉÃ ªÉÄÃ 97.
«µÀAiÀÄ : ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è, £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è ºÁUÀÆ CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è
«¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ºÁUÀÆ ¨ÁQ EgÀÄªÀ ²¹Û£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À ¥ÀæUÀwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï
CªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ºÁUÀÆ G¸ÀÄÛªÁj (Monitoring) §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
G¯ÉèÃR : 1. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : fJr : 3 : ¹JDgï : 57 : ¢ : 14Š12Š57.
2. C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå : fJr : 28 : J¸ïJ¸ïDgï : 69 : ¢ : 12Š12Š73.
3. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï : 5 : J¸ïJ¸ïDgï : 79: ¢ : 8Š7Š81.
4. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï : 13: J¸ïrE : 85, ¢ : 3÷Š7Š85.
9. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 6 ¸ÉÃE« 95, ¢ : 16Š3Š1995.
10. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 16 ¸ÉÃE« 95, ¢ : 23Š11Š95.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ, D¥Á¢vÀ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À §UÉÎ ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ, PÁ®PÁ®PÉÌ, ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ªÉÄÃ°£À 1 jAzÀ 7, gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀUÀ¼À°è ¤ÃrzÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À ¸ÁgÁA±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß,
ªÉÄÃ¯É 7gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 30Š12Š86gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
3. ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ¯ÉPÀÌ¥ÀvÀæUÀ¼À ¸À«Äw (1986Š87) (8£ÉÃ «zsÁ£À¸À¨sÉ) vÀ£Àß 14£ÉÃ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ°è ªÀiÁrzÀ
²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄìUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, ªÉÄÃ¯É 7gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 30Š12Š86gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. CzÀgÀ ¸ÀÄ¸ÀA§zÀÞ ¨sÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ GzÀÞj¹zÉ :Š
`È¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À «¯ÉÃªÁj §UÉÎ, UÀªÀÄ£À«nÖgÀ®Ä ¤AiÀÄvÀPÁ°PÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß DVAzÁUÉÎ
¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ. FUÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: r¦JDgï 43 J¸ïrE 84, ¢£ÁAPÀ
14Š2Š85gÀ°è vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ. CzÀgÀAvÉ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ:CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ vÀªÀÄä G£ÀßvÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À §UÉÎ vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¸À°è¸À¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°ègÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆ§â E¯ÁSÁ
ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ E¯ÁSÁ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ C¢üPÁjUÀ½AzÀ vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ CªÀ¢ü ªÀÄÄVzÀ vÀPÀët vÀj¹PÉÆAqÀÄ «¯ÉÃ DUÀzÉÃ
G½¢gÀÄªÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À : E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ ºÉaÑUÉ EgÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ
¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ²ÃWÀæ «¯ÉÃªÁjUÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîªÀAvÉ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¤ÃqÀ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÃ½gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ : ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆa ªÀÄvÀÄÛ vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß CvÀåAvÀ
¤µÉ×¬ÄAzÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥Á°¹zÀ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À°è «¼ÀA§ªÁUÀÄªÀ
¥ÀæªÉÄÃAiÀÄªÉÃ GzÀã«¸ÀÄªÀÅ¢®è. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ, E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÉ D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ
£ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ« vÀ¤SÉ, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ, E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉ ªÀÄÄVzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ CAwªÀÄ DzÉÃ±À ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è «¼ÀA§ DUÀ¢gÀÄªÀAvÉ
£ÉÆÃrPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ PÁ¯ÁªÀ¢üUÉ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¥ÀÇgÉÊ¸À®Ä PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀàµÀÖ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. F
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èAX¸ÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ vÁªÉÃ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉUÉ M¼À¥ÀqÀ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉAiÉÄAzÀÄ
F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ w½¸À¯ÁVzÉ.''
4. ªÉÄÃ¯É (8)gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ 30Š8Š88gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï «¯ÉÆÃQ¹, CzÀgÀ §UÉÎ £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹, CzÀgÀ ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DgÀÄ
wAUÀ½UÉÆªÉÄä d£ÀªÀj 20, ºÁUÀÆ dÄ¯ÉÊ 20gÉÆ¼ÀUÁV ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÁ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄ)UÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À®Ä ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
5. ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ¯ÉPÀÌ ¥ÀvÀæUÀ¼À ¸À«Äw (1995Š96) (10£ÉÃ «zsÁ£À¸À¨sÉ), ²PÀët E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ
85Š86 ºÁUÀÆ 87Š88£ÉÃ ¸Á°£À vÀ£Àß ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ PÀArPÉŠ3.2gÀ°è ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄì ªÀiÁrzÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, ªÉÄÃ¯É (10)gÀ°è
G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 23Š11Š95gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¤ÃrzÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À ¸ÀÄ¸ÀA§zÀÞ ¨sÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ
GzÀÞj¹zÉ :Š
``(J) ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À CPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ : zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §AzÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ wAUÀ¼ÉÆ¼ÀUÁV CAvÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
eÁjUÉÆ½¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ ºÁUÀÆ ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀjµÀ× 15 wAUÀ¼ÉÆ¼ÀUÁV CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
(©) DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ DgÉÆÃ¥À ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄÄ ¹éÃPÀøvÀªÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ
PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±À, GzÁºÀgÀuÉUÉ 15 ¢£ÀUÀ¼À M¼ÀUÁV °TvÀ ºÉÃ½PÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ
DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ °TvÀ ºÉÃ½PÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¸À®Ä ºÉaÑUÉ PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÉÆÃjzÀ°è,
E£ÀÄß 15 ¢£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ «ÄÃgÀzÀAvÉ ºÉaÑ£À PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ.''
6. ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ, «µÀAiÀÄPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ, ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ¯ÉPÀÌ¥ÀvÀæUÀ¼À ¸À«Äw (1996Š97) (10£ÉÃ «zsÁ¸À¨sÉ)
vÀ£Àß 16£ÉÃ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ°è ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄìUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁrzÉ. CzÀgÀ ¸ÀÄ¸ÀA§zÀÞ ¨sÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ GzÀÞj¹zÉ :÷Š
"(a) The Committee, therefore, suggest that Government should fix a maximum period from
the date the defalcations, misappropriations came to notice, for commencing disciplinary
proceedings, that is for serving articles of charges on the Accused Government Officials;
(b)... When the physical progress was reviewed, cases, where the circular instructions were
violated by taking more than 15 months to complete the disciplinary proceedings should also
have come to notice and in such cases the concerned disciplinary authorities should have
been asked to explain the delay;
(c)... It is seen from the information and replies given during discussions, that the word
"review" has been taken to mean ascertainment of number of cases pending for over a year
and reminding the concerned disciplinary authorities to expedite the cases. A review should
be analytical. A review of pending cases should also disclose why cases are pending for over
a year. The Secretaries and Heads of Departments should invariably insist that the
Disciplinary authorities should furnish reasons for pendency. Failure to cite reasons should
itself invite strong action;
(d) The Committee, therefore, feel that all the cases of disciplinary proceedings in all the
departments, should be monitored ruthlessly and relentlessly. The Officers responsible for
the delay in the proceedings should themselves be punished;
(e) ... The Committee, therefore, recommend that Government should prescribe a time limit
for initiating disciplinary proceedings by conducting a preliminary investigation, where
found necessary and serving charges on the Accused Government Officials on the basis of
the preliminary investigation say 6 months since the irregularity came to the notice of the
Department/Government. The Heads of Department should be required to indicate this
information also in their quarterly returns and Department of Personnel and Administrative
Reforms should suitably modify the existing proforma of the quarterly returns (vide
Committee's recommendations in paragraph 3.2 of the 7th Report (X Assembly)."
7. FUÁUÀ¯ÉÃ ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÃ½zÀAvÉ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 23.11.1995gÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É (10) gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ
eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸À®Ä F PÉ¼ÀPÀªÀÄqÀ
PÁ®«ÄwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ:-
(C) ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À CPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ : zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §AzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ
ªÀÄÆgÀÄ wAUÀ¼ÉÆ¼ÀUÁV CAvÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
eÁjUÉÆ½¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ; ºÁUÀÆ
(D) ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀjµÀ× 15 wAUÀ¼ÉÆ¼ÀUÁV CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÛÄ DqÀ½vÀ
¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ) ªÀiÁrzÀ CzsÀåAiÀÄ£ÀzÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß
DgÀA©ü¸À®Ä, CAzÀgÉ, zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß eÁjUÉÆ½¸À®Ä, ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ
¸ÀgÁ¸Àj ¸ÀÄªÀiÁgÀÄ JgÀqÀÄ ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À PÁ® vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîwÛzÁÝgÉ. £ÀAvÀgÀ, CAzÀgÉ,
zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß eÁjUÉÆ½¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸À®Ä,
CAzÀgÉ zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¸À®Ä CxÀªÁ, ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÁð£ÀÄ¸ÁgÀ, DgÉÆÃ¥À¢AzÀ RÄ¯Á¸É ªÀiÁr, CAwªÀÄ
DzÉÃ±À ºÉÆgÀr¸À®Ä ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀgÁ¸Àj JgÀqÀÆªÀgÉ ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À PÁ®
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîwÛzÁÝgÉ. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 23Š11Š1995gÀ ¸ÀzÀj C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è
¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÀ ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸À®Ä ªÀÄÆgÀÄ wAUÀ¼À PÁ® ºÁUÀÆ CzÀ£ÀÄß
CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ºÀ¢£ÉÊzÀÄ wAUÀ¼À PÁ® ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ E®èªÉAzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ§gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ªÉÄÃ°£À LlA
7(C)zÀ°è ºÉÃ½zÀ PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß, ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄÄ, ªÉÄÃ°£À LlA (E)gÀ°è ¸ÀÆa¹zÀAvÉ ºÁUÀÆ
ªÁ¸ÀÛªÀªÁV FUÀ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¯ÁUÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ£ÀzÀ°èlÄÖPÉÆAqÀÄ, ªÀÄÆgÀÄ
wAUÀ¼À §zÀ¯ÁV DgÀÄ wAUÀ¼ÁV ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ. ªÉÄÃ°£À LlA 7(C)zÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ
PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß E£ÀÆß ºÉaÑ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ, ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ «¼ÀA§zÀ ¥Àæ±ÉßUÉ ¥ÀjºÁgÀªÀ®èªÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ
¨sÁ«¹zÉ. ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À°è DUÀÄªÀ «¼ÀA§PÉÌ ªÀÄÄRåªÁV, F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ
PÁgÀtUÀ¼ÉAzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ§A¢zÉ :Š
(C) zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¸ÀÄªÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä CxÀªÁ
¥ÁægÀA©üPÀ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ «¼ÀA§
(«ZÁgÀuÁ C¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÆß ¸ÀºÀ E°è
¸ÉÃj¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ);
(D) «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀéjvÀªÁV ªÀiÁqÀzÉÃ, «ZÁgÀuÁ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ «¼ÀA§; ºÁUÀÆ
(E) D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ GzÉÝÃ±À ¥ÀÇªÀðPÀªÁV «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ°è ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ
«¼ÀA§.
ªÉÄÃ°£À LlA (C)UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸À®Ä FUÁUÀ¯ÉÃ ¢£ÁAPÀ
23Š11Š1995gÀ ¸ÀzÀj C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ªÀÄÆgÀÄ wAUÀ¼À PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÀÄÝ, CzÀ£ÀÄß
§zÀ¯Á¬Ä¹, DgÀÄ wAUÀ½UÉ, FUÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÃ½zÀAvÉ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÉ. ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ DgÀA©ü¹, ªÀÄÄV¸À®Ä,
««zsÀ ºÀAvÀUÀ½UÁV F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ UÀjµÀ× PÁ®«ÄwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ. ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ F
PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ:Š
²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄzÀ ºÀAvÀ UÀjµÀ× PÁ®«Äw
(J) ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ CPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ: zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉUÀ¼ÀÄ,
²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §AzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ,
zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¸ÀÄªÀ 6 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
¸À®ÄªÁV zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä CxÀªÁ
¥ÁægÀA©üPÀ vÀ¤SÉ : «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸À®Ä
ºÁUÀÆ zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹,
eÁjUÉÆ½¸À®Ä;
(©) zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖUÉ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À
«ªÀgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä ºÁUÀÆ «ZÁgÀuÁ 2 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
C¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÉÃ«Ä¸À®Ä ;
(¹) «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ «ZÁgÀuÁ 6 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä;
(r) «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjÃ²Ã°¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ
CzÀ£ÀÄß ¹éÃPÀj¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¤tð¬Ä¸À®Ä; 2 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
(E) PÁgÀt PÉÃ¼ÀÄªÀ J¥ÀqÀ£ÉÃ ¸ÀÆZÀ£Á ¥ÀvÀæªÀ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ
ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ eÉÆvÉUÉ, D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ 2 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
¤ÃqÀ®Ä;
(J¥sï) CAwªÀÄ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À®Ä. 3 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
8. ªÉÄÃ¯É ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÀ 21 wAUÀ¼À UÀjµÀ× PÁ®«Äw AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ MAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ E®èªÉAzÀÄ
¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ PÀAqÀÄ §AzÀ°è, CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è, D ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ, D
PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¸ÀÛj¸À®Ä vÀ£Àß ªÉÄÃ®¢üPÁjAiÀÄ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉÆÃgÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÉÃ ²¹Û£À
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÁVgÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, ¸ÀzÀj PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¸ÀÛj¸À®Ä,
E¯ÁSÁ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß, C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. EzÉÃ
jÃw AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ MAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è, ªÉÄÃ°£À LlA (¹)gÀ°è «¢ü¹zÀ 6 wAUÀ¼À PÁ®«Äw ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ
E®èªÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÉ PÀAqÀÄ§AzÀ°è, CAvÀºÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁj, D PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
«¸ÀÛj¸À®Ä, ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
9. EzÀ®èzÉÃ, PÀArPÉ 7gÀ°è «ªÀj¹zÀ «¼ÀA§UÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ
«ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À £ÀqÀÄªÉ ºÉaÑ£À ¥ÀgÀ¸ÀàgÀªÁV PÁAiÀÄð ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ (greater interaction) CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ
EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F GzÉÝÃ±ÀPÁÌV, F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ:Š
(J) J¯Áè ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, F C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀPÉÌ ®UÀwÛ¹zÀ £ÀªÀÄÆ£É (1)gÀ°è, ²¹Û£À
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ jf¸ÀÖgÀ£ÀÄß ¤ªÀð»¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ;
(©) E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ, vÀªÀÄä ºÁUÀÆ C¢üÃ£À PÀbÉÃjUÀ¼À vÀ¥Á¸ÀuÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è, ªÉÄÃ°£À
LlA (J)gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹gÀÄªÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À jf¸ÀÖgÀ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹, ¨ÁQ EgÀÄªÀ ²¹Û£À
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «±ÉÃµÀªÁV ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ;
(¹) UÀÆæ¥ïŠ¹ ºÁUÀÆ UÀÆæ¥ïŠr UÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ £ËPÀgÀjUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ, PÉëÃvÀæ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À E¯ÁSÁ
ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ CªÀgÀªÀgÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ºÁUÀÆ (²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ
£ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁrzÀ) «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àæw ªÀÄÆgÀÄ wAUÀ½UÉÆªÉÄä £ÀqÉ¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. F
¸À¨sÉUÁV PÉëÃvÀæ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ¸ÀzÀj £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉŠ1gÀ°è ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ½AzÀ ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÉÃ ²¹Û£À
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÁVgÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¸ÀA¥ÀÇtð ªÀiÁ»w E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀ PÀbÉÃjAiÀÄ°èAiÉÄÃ
®¨sÀå«gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è, E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÉÃ, £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉŠ1gÀ°è ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
zÁR°¹, ¸ÀzÀj vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀÅ£Àgï CªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ,
¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ ²¹Û£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀzÀj ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. ºÁUÀÆ CzÀgÀ
(£ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉŠ1gÀ°è£À ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ) MAzÀÄ ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀjUÉ
PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃPÀ£É ªÀiÁqÀÄªÁUÀ F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «±ÉÃ±ÀªÁV
UÀªÀÄ¤¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ :Š
(C) ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½AiÀÄ, £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉŠ1gÀ°è ºÉÃ½gÀÄªÀ ««zsÀ ºÀAvÀUÀ¼À ¥ÉÊQ, AiÀiÁªÀ ºÀAvÀzÀ°è
«¼ÀA§ªÁVzÉ; D «¼ÀA§PÉÌ PÁgÀt K£ÀÄ? ºÁUÀÆ CzÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÄÖªÀ G¥ÁAiÀÄ K£ÀÄ?
(D) EzÀ®èzÉÃ, MAzÀÄ ªÀµÀð ºÁUÀÆ CzÀQÌAvÀ ºÉaÑ£À CªÀ¢üUÉ ¨ÁQ¬ÄgÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è
CUÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ «¼ÀA§PÉÌ PÁgÀt K£ÀÄ? JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ¤¹, zÁR°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ, CAvÀºÀ
PÁgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉëÃvÀæ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉŠ1gÀ°è
¤ÃqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ, ¸ÀzÀj PÁgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀzÉÃ EzÀÝ°è, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ
²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä PÉëÃvÀæ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀjUÉ ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄì ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
(r) UÀÆæ¥ïŠJ ºÁUÀÆ UÀÆæ¥ïŠ© UÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ:Š
UÀÆæ¥ïŠJ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÀÆæ¥ïŠ© UÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÃ½zÀAvÉ PÉëÃvÀæ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÁzÀ
PÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß CªÀgÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. CAzÀgÉ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ,
£ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉŠ1gÀ°è ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ½AzÀ ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ, CzÀ£ÀÄß PÀ¤µÀÖ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ
wAUÀ½UÉÆªÉÄä ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. ºÁUÀÆ CzÀgÀ (£ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉŠ1gÀ°è£À ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ) ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀjUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
F jÃw UÀÆæ¥ïŠ `¹' ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÀÆæ¥ï `r' £ËPÀgÀjUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¹Û£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À ¥ÀÅ£Àgï
CªÀ¯ÉÆÃPÀ£É (Review) ºÁUÀÆ G¸ÀÄÛªÁj (Monitoring) PÁAiÀÄðªÀ£ÀÄß PÉëÃvÀæ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ
¤ªÀð»¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. EzÉÃ jÃw UÀÆæ¥ï `J' ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÀÆæ¥ï `©' C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¹Û£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À
¥ÀÅ£Àgï CªÀ¯ÉÆÃPÀ£É (Review) ºÁUÀÆ G¸ÀÄÛªÁj (Monitoring) PÁAiÀÄðªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤ªÀð»¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. CAzÀgÉ, ²¹Û£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß wÃªÀæªÁV «¯ÉÃ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ºÁUÀÆ
CªÀÅUÀ¼À ¥ÀÅ£Àgï CªÀ¯ÉÆÃPÀ£É ºÁUÀÆ G¸ÀÄÛªÁj §UÉÎ ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ
ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Á°¸ÀÄªÀ ºÉÆuÉ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð:PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀzÁÝVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß CªÀgÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ PÉëÃvÀæ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
¸ÀºÀ ¥Á°¸ÀÄªÀ ºÉÆuÉ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð:PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀzÁÝVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
10. ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀArPÉŠ7 ºÁUÀÆ 8gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃR¹zÀ PÁ®«ÄwAiÉÆ¼ÀUÉ CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀzÉÃ
EzÀÝ°è, D «¼ÀA§PÉÌ dªÁ¨ÁÝjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À°ègÀÄªÀ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ
C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ:E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ:²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ: «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ
(ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁj, «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdgÁzÀÝ°è) CªÀgÀzÁÝVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
11. «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw :Š
²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÁUÀ, ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ JZÀÑjPÉ (care)AiÀÄ£ÀÄß
ªÀ»¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. MªÉÄä «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁrzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ PÁgÀtPÀÆÌ «ZÁgÀuÉ
ªÀÄÄVAiÀÄÄªÀªÀgÉUÉ CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß §zÀ¯Á¬Ä¸À¨ÁgÀzÀÄ, D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ°è
¸ÀºÀPÀj¸ÀzÉÃ EzÀÝ°è CxÀªÁ ¨ÉÃgÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¸ÀªÀÄxÀð¤ÃAiÀÄªÀ®èzÀ PÁgÀtPÁÌV «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀ°è CqÀZÀuÉ GAlÄ ªÀiÁrzÀ°è, «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß KPÀ¥ÀQëÃAiÀÄªÁV (ex-parte)
CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À°è ®¨sÀå«gÀÄªÀ CªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß
G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉÆ¼Àî§ºÀÄzÀÄ.
12. ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÃ½gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ : ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆa ªÀÄvÀÄÛ vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß CvÀåAvÀ ¤µÉ×¬ÄAzÀ
¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥Á°¸ÀzÀ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è, ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À°è «¼ÀA§ªÁUÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæªÉÄÃAiÀÄªÉÃ
GzÀã«¸ÀÄªÀÅ¢®è. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ, E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÉ, D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ, ¥ÀÇªÀð¨sÁ«
vÀ¤SÉ, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ, «ZÁgÀuÉ ªÀÄÄVzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ CAwªÀÄ DzÉÃ±À ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀ, F
J¯Áè ºÀAvÀUÀ¼À°è «¼ÀA§ DUÀ¢gÀÄªÀAvÉ £ÉÆÃrPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ UÀjµÀ×
PÁ¯ÁªÀ¢üAiÉÆ¼ÀUÉ E¯ÁSÁ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇgÉÊ¸À®Ä PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀàµÀÖ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èAX¸ÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ vÁªÉÃ PÀvÀðªÀå¯ÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ
DgÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄPÉÌ M¼À¥ÀqÀ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉAiÉÄAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ w½¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
13. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ZÁZÀÆ vÀ¥ÀàzÉÃ
¥Á°¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
¸À»/÷Š
PÉ.J¯ï. dAiÀÄgÁªÀiï,
£ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉŠ1
C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 14 ¸ÉÃE« 96, ¢£ÁAPÀ 31Š5Š1997.
²¹Û£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À jf¸ÀÖgÀÄ:ªÀgÀ¢
²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ¥ÀzÀ£ÁªÀÄ : E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ............
PÀæªÀÄ CgÉÆÃ¦vÀ CPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ: DgÀA©üPÀ DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ CAwªÀÄ ²¹Û£À MAzÀÄ «¼ÀA§PÉÌ µÀgÁ
¸ÀASÉå ¸ÀPÁðj zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ vÀ¤SÉ ¸ÀPÁðj ¢üPÁj ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ ºÀAvÀ. CzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß £ÀqÀªÀ½ ªÀµÀðzÀ PÁgÀt
£ËPÀgÀ£À:¼À UÀ¼ÀÄ ²¹Û£À (preliminary £ËPÀgÀgÀ ºÁUÀÆ «ZÁgÀuÉ ºÉÆgÀr¹ AiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÁ® gÁzÀ
ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ investigation) «gÀÄzÀÞ ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁj ªÀÄÄV¢zÀÝ°è zÀ°è CzÀgÀ MAzÀÄ «Äw ¸ÀA§AzsÀ
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ DgÀA©ü¹zÀ°è zÉÆÃµÁ UÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÉÃ«Ä «ZÁgÀuÁ «ªÀgÀ ªÀµÀðzÀ «Æj ¥ÀlÖªÀgÀ
¥ÀzÀ£ÁªÀÄ §AzÀ CxÀªÁ gÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ ¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ ªÀgÀ¢¸À°è¹zÀ CAwªÀÄ PÁ®«Äw zÀÝ°è, ªÉÄÃ¯É
¢£ÁAPÀ zÁR¯É ¥ÀnÖ ºÁUÀÆ «ZÁ ¢£ÁAPÀ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß AiÉÆ¼ÀUÉ CzÀPÉÌ vÉUÉzÀÄ
UÀ¼À£ÀÄß (CnðPÀ¯ïì gÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀzÉÃ ªÀÄÄPÁÛAiÀÄ PÁgÀt PÉÆAqÀ
¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä D¥sï ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ, ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ EzÀÝ°è, UÉÆ½¸À¯Á PÀæªÀÄzÀ
PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄ ZÁeïð) ¥ÀzÀ£ÁªÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É CzÀPÉÌ VzÉAiÉÄÃ? «ªÀgÀ
PÉÆArzÀÝ°è, ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «¼Á¸À vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀ PÁgÀt.
CzÀ£ÀÄß ¢£ÁAPÀ PÀæªÀÄzÀ
¥ÀÇtð ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ
UÉÆ½¹zÀ : ºÀAvÀ
¥ÀqÉzÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : UÀÆæ¥ï `©' ªÀUÀðzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¹ zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ £ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ
9(2) (JJ), (©), (©©) ºÁUÀÆ 15(2J)gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, CzÀgÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹zÀ J¯Áè E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ,
UÀÆæ¥ï `©' UÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¹, CzÀgÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹zÀ C®àzÀAqÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
(Minor penalties) «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ.
2. F jÃw E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜjUÉ, UÀÆæ¥ï `©' C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É, ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¹, zÀAqÀ£É
«¢ü¸À®Ä C¢üPÁgÀ ¤ÃrzÀÝgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ, C£ÉÃPÀ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ, F C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß §¼À¸ÀzÉÃ,
¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ, vÀªÀÄUÉ ¤ÃrzÀ ¸ÀzÀj C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß
§¼À¸ÀzÉÃ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ UÀA©üÃgÀªÁV ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¹zÉ.
3. ¢£ÁAPÀ 28Š4Š1980gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 17 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 80gÀ°è F §UÉÎ «ªÀgÀªÁzÀ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. (¥Àæw ®UÀwÛ¹zÉ). CzÀgÀ°è£À ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ
UÀÆæ¥ï `©' C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¹, «ZÁgÀuÉ ªÀÄÄVzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ UÀÄgÀÄvÀgÀ zÀAqÀ£É
«¢ü¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è ªÀiÁvÀæ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
4. ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À G®èAWÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ UÀA©üÃgÀªÁV ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¸À¯ÁUÀÄªÀÅzÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀºÀ ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
2. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 24 ¸ÉÃE« 88, ¢£ÁAPÀ 6Š6Š1988.
3. DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 35 J¸ïrE 86, ¢£ÁAPÀ 7Š1Š1987.
4. ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå : ¹ÇÀÄE 4 J¸ïrE 95, ¢£ÁAPÀ 21Š2Š1995.
5. ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 17 ¸ÉÃE« 95, ¢£ÁAPÀ 28Š10Š1995.
6. DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 9 ¸ÉÃE« 96, ¢£ÁAPÀ 22Š6Š1996.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ AiÀiÁªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛUÉÆ½¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß
JµÀÄÖ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄªÀgÉUÉ ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ JA§ÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃTvÀ (1)gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è
ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. F ¸ÀA§AzsÀzÀ°è, ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ (2) jAzÀ (7)gÀ°è£À C¢üPÀøvÀ
eÕÁ¥À£À : DzÉÃ±À : ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À PÀqÉUÉ UÀªÀÄ£À ¸É¼É¢zÉ.
2. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 10(1) (©)gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï C¥ÀgÁzsÀzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ°è
CxÀªÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ (trial) AiÀÄ°è EzÁÝUÀ, ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ CªÀ£À£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ.
3. M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ®AZÀ ¤gÉÆÃzsÀ PÁAiÉÄÝ, 1988gÀrAiÀÄ°è Qæ«Ä£À¯ï C¥ÀgÁzsÀzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt
vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ°è CxÀªÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ (trial) AiÀÄ°èzÁÝUÀ, ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ, CAvÀºÀ £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è
EqÀ¨ÁgÀzÉAzÀÄ ¨sÁ«¹zÀ°è (not to place under suspension), F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ:Š
(1) ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ, E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ CxÀªÁ ¨ÉÃgÉ
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ C¢üPÁjAiÀiÁVzÀÝ°è, ºÁUÀÆ CªÀgÀÄ CAvÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¨ÁgÉAzÀÄ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ ¥ÀnÖzÀÝ°è, E¯ÁSÁ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼À ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄÄRå
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼À ªÀÄÄSÁAvÀgÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£É ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ;
(2) `J' ªÀÄvÀÄÛ `©' UÀÄA¦£À CAvÀºÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð:
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ ªÀÄÄSÁAvÀgÀ, E¯ÁSÁ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ ºÁUÀÆ
ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæAiÀÄªÀgÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£É ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
4. PÀArPÉ 2 gÀ°è£À ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ: ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ,
E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ EvÀgÀ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ vÀ¥ÀàzÉÃ ¥Á°¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
G¯ÉèÃR : 1. ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 18 ¸Á¹« 97, ¢£ÁAPÀ 20Š6Š97.
2. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : ¹ÇÀÄE 14 ¸ÉÃE« 96, ¢£ÁAPÀ 31Š6Š97.
ªÉÄÃ¯É (1)gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹gÀÄªÀ DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ°è, ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ
«±ÉÃµÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð (DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ, vÀgÀ¨ÉÃw ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ «±ÁæAw ªÉÃvÀ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ) JA§ÄªÀ
ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸Àøf¸À¯ÁVzÉ. ¸ÀzÀj DzÉÃ±ÀPÉÌ ®UÀwÛ¹zÀ C£ÀÄ§AzsÀzÀ°è, EvÀgÀ «µÀAiÀÄUÀ¼À eÉÆvÉ ¹§âA¢
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¹, ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ J¯Áè E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À ºÁUÀÆ EvÀgÉ
E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀÄªÀ «µÀAiÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀzÀj «±ÉÃµÀ
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀjUÉ ºÀAZÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ (2)gÀ°è£À C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è, ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ DgÀA©ü¹, CzÀ£ÀÄß CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ««zsÀ
ºÀAvÀUÀ½UÉ, 21 wAUÀ¼À PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
3. UÀÆæ¥ï `¹' ºÁUÀÆ UÀÆæ¥ï `r' UÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ £ËPÀgÀjUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ, PÉëÃvÀæ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À E¯ÁSÁ
ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ CªÀgÀªÀgÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À ºÁUÀÆ (²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ
ªÀiÁrzÀ) «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àæw ªÀÄÆgÀÄ wAUÀ½UÉÆªÉÄä £ÀqÉ¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. F ¸À¨sÉUÁV PÉëÃvÀæ
E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ¸ÀzÀj £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉŠ1 gÀ°è ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¹Û£À
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ½AzÀ ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÉÃ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÁVgÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è, ¸ÀA¥ÀÇtð
ªÀiÁ»w E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀ PÀbÉÃjAiÀÄ°èAiÉÄÃ ®¨sÀå«gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÉÃ
£ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉŠ1gÀ°è ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß zÁR°¹, ¸ÀzÀj vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. ºÁUÀÆ CzÀgÀ
(£ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉŠ1 gÀ°è£À ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ) MAzÀÄ ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀjUÉ
PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
4. UÀÆæ¥ï `J' ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÀÆæ¥ï `©' UÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÃ½zÀAvÉ, PÉëÃvÀæ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
CªÀgÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. CAzÀgÉ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉŠ1 gÀ°è ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ½AzÀ ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ, CzÀ£ÀÄß PÀ¤µÀÖ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ wAUÀ½UÉÆªÉÄä ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
ºÁUÀÆ CzÀgÀ (£ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉŠ1gÀ°è£À ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ) ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀjUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»vÀ¸ÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ
JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
5. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ «±ÉÃµÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð (DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ, vÀgÀ¨ÉÃw ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ «±ÁæAw
ªÉÃvÀ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ), gÀªÀgÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ 31Š5Š97gÀ ¸ÀzÀj C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è£À ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
ºÁUÀÆ PÉëÃvÀæ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ¥Á°¸ÀÄwÛzÁÝgÉÆÃ? CxÀªÁ E®èªÉÇÃ JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß
¥Àj²Ã°¸ÀÄvÁÛgÉ. ¨ÁQ G½¢gÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À ¥ÀÅ£Àgï CªÀ¯ÉÆÃPÀ£É (Review) AiÀÄÆ
¸ÀºÀ CªÀgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
6. F GzÉÝÃ±ÀPÁÌV, ¢£ÁAPÀ 31Š5Š97gÀ ¸ÀzÀj C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀPÉÌ ®UÀwÛ¹zÀ £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉAiÀÄ°è vÉæøªÀiÁ¹PÀ
ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ, «±ÉÃµÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, (DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ, vÀgÀ¨ÉÃw ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
gÁdQÃAiÀÄ «±ÁæAw ªÉÃvÀ£À) EªÀjUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
¸À»/÷Š
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ D¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ,
1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 28ŠJ gÀr DzÉÃ±À, £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ÀÄ ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß eÁj ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ
§UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR : 1. ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: r¦JDgï 61 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï ¢£ÁAPÀ 1Š10Š80.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀrAiÀÄ°è
ºÉÆgÀr¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ DzÉÃ±À, £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÉ DzÉÃ²PÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß (¥ÉÇæ¸É¸ï) ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ D
¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 28ŠJgÀ°è «ªÀj¸À¯ÁVzÉ. CzÀgÀ°è ®¨sÀå«gÀÄªÀ ¥ÀAiÀiÁðAiÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ
«ªÀj¹zÉ:Š
(J) RÄzÁÝV;
(©) £ÉÆÃAzÁ¬ÄvÀ CAZÉ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ;
(¹) ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ, CAvÀºÀ DzÉÃ±À, £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ CxÀªÁ EvÀgÀ DzÉÃ²PÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß (¥ÉÇæ¸É¸ï)
¹éÃPÀj¸À®Ä ¤gÁPÀj¸ÀÄªÀ°è CxÀªÁ CªÀÅUÀ¼À eÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀ¦à¹PÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ GzÉÝÃ±À¢AzÀ ªÀÄgÉAiÀÄ°è
EgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è, CªÀÅUÀ¼À ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ CxÀªÁ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ
PÀbÉÃjAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£Á ¥sÀ®PÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀ£ÀÄ F »AzÉ ªÁ¸ÀªÁVzÀÝ£ÉAzÀÄ w½AiÀÄ¯ÁzÀ
ªÀÄ£É¬ÄzÀÝgÉ, CzÀgÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ JzÀÄÝ PÁtÄªÀ ¸ÀÜ¼ÀzÀ°è CAn¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ;
(r) ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÃ½zÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ «zsÁ£ÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¸ÀzÀj £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ÀÄ EvÁå¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß eÁjUÉÆ½¸À®Ä
¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀzÉÃ EzÀÝ°è, CAwªÀÄ ¥ÀAiÀiÁðAiÀÄªÁV (As the last alternative), ¢£À¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼À°è
¥ÀæPÀn¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ.
2. ¢£À¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼À°è ¥ÀæPÀn¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀzÀj £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ÀÄ EvÁå¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß eÁj ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀQÌAvÀ, ªÉÄÃ¯É
LlA (J) jAzÀ (¹)gÀ°è ºÉÃ½zÀ ¥ÀAiÀiÁðAiÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉaÑ£À PÁAiÀÄð¸ÁzsÀåªÁVªÉ. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ, «ZÁgÀuÁ
C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, ªÉÄÃ°£À LlA (J), (©) ªÀÄvÀÄÛ (¹)gÀ°è£À «zsÁ£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹, ¸ÀzÀj ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀrAiÀÄ°è £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ÀÄ EvÁå¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß eÁjUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ. D
¥ÀAiÀiÁðAiÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C£ÀÄ¸Àj¹, £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ÀÄ EvÁå¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß eÁjUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀzÉÃ EzÀÝ°è ªÀiÁvÀæ,
CAwªÀÄ ¥ÀAiÀiÁðAiÀÄªÁV (As the last alternative), ¢£À¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼À°è ¥ÀæPÀluÉAiÀÄ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ÀÄ,
EvÁå¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß eÁjUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ. ¸ÀAQë¥ÀÛªÁV, ºÉÃ¼ÀÄªÀÅzÁzÀgÉ, ªÉÄÃ°£À LlA (J),
(©) ªÀÄvÀÄÛ (¹)gÀ°è ºÉÃ½zÀ ¥ÀAiÀiÁðAiÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C£ÀÄ¸Àj¹, ¸ÀzÀj £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ÀÄ EvÁå¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß eÁjUÉÆ½¸À®Ä
¥ÀæAiÀÄwß¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ D jÃw ¥ÀæAiÀÄvÀßzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀªÀÇ, CªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß eÁjUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀzÉÃ EzÀÝ°è
ªÀiÁvÀæ, CAwªÀÄ ¥ÀAiÀiÁðAiÀÄªÁV (As the last alternative) ¢£À¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼À°è ¥ÀæPÀn¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ
eÁjUÉÆ½¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ.
3. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ : PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ : E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ, ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÃ½zÀ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
¸À»/Š
¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 5 ¸ÉÃE« 96 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼À°è Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ¨ÁQ EzÁÝUÀ CzÉÃ
DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ : E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ºÀÆqÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄ ºÁUÀÆ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ°è ºÀÆqÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄ ¨ÉÃgÉ ¨ÉÃgÉ
¥ÀæQæAiÉÄUÀ¼ÁVªÉ. ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼À°è Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ¨ÁQ EzÁÝUÀ CzÉÃ
DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À §UÉÎ ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸À§ºÀÄzÁVzÉ. F «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è, ¢£ÁAPÀ 27Š9Š1996 gÀAzÀÄ
¸ÀªÉÇðÃ£ÀßvÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ, gÁd¸ÁÜ£ï ¸ÀPÁðgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ©.PÉ. «Æ£Á ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÀgÀÄ (1996)6
¸ÀÄ¦æÃAPÉÆÃmïð PÉÃ¸À¸ï 417, ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ wÃ¥ÀÅð ¤ÃrzÉ :Š
"15. We are quite aware of the fact that not all the disciplinary proceedings are based upon
true charges; some of them may be unfounded. It may also be that in some cases, charges are
levelled with oblique motives. But these possibilities do not detract from the desirability of
early conclusion of these proceedings. Indeed, in such cases, it is all the more in the interest
of the charged officer that the proceedings are expeditiously concluded. Delay in such cases
really works against him.
16. Now, let us examine the facts of the present case. The memo of charges against the
respondent was served on him, along with the articles of charges, on 13.10.1992. On
9.2.1993, he submitted a detailed reply/defence statement, running into 90 pages,
controverting the allegations levelled against him. The challan against him was filed on
15.5.1993 in the criminal court. The respondent promptly applied to the Tribunal and got the
disciplinary proceedings stayed. They remain stayed till today. The irregularities alleged
against the respondent are of the year 1989. The conclusion of the criminal proceedings is
nowhere in sight. (Each party blames the other for the said delay and we cannot pronounce
upon it in the absence of proper material before us). More than six years have passed by. The
charges were served upon the respondent about 4 years back. The respondent has already
disclosed his defence in his elaborate and detailed statement filed on 9.2.1993. There is no
question of his being compelled to disclose his defence in the disciplinary proceedings
which would prejudice him in a criminal case. The charges against the respondent are very
serious. They pertain to misappropriation of public funds to the tune of more than rupees one
crore. The observation of the Tribunal that in the course of examination of evidence, new
material may emerge against the respondent and he may be compelled to disclose his
defence is, at best, a surmise- a speculatory reason. We cannot accept it as valid. Though the
respondent was suspended pending enquiry in May 1990, the order has been revoked in
October 1993. The respondent is continuing in office. It is in his interest and in the interest
of good administration that the truth or falsity of the charges against him is determined
promptly. To wit, if he is not guilty of the charges, his honour should be vindicated early and
if he is guilty, he should be dealt with appropriately without any avoidable delay. The
criminal court may decide - whenever it does - whether the respondent is guilty of the
offences charges and if so, what sentence should be imposed upon him. The interest of
administration, however, cannot brook any delay in disciplinary proceedings for the reasons
indicated hereinabove.
17. There is yet another reason. The approach and the objective in the criminal proceedings
and the disciplinary proceedings is altogether distinct and different. In the disciplinary
proceedings, the question is whether the respondent is guilty of such conduct as would merit
his removal from service or a lesser punishment, as the case may be, whereas in the criminal
proceedings the question is whether the offences registered against him under the Prevention
of Corruption Act (and the Indian Penal Code, if any) are established and, if established
what sentence should be imposed upon him. The standard of proof, the mode of enquiry and
the rules governing the enquiry and trial in both the cases are entirely distinct and different.
Staying of disciplinary proceedings pending criminal proceedings, to repeat, should not be a
matter of course but a considered decision. Even if stayed at one stage, the decision may
require reconsideration if the criminal case gets unduly delayed."
2. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ : PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ:E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ, ¸ÀªÉÇðÃ£ÀßvÀ
£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ, ªÉÄÃ¯É GzÀÞj¹zÀ wÃ¥Àð£ÀÄß, vÀªÀÄä ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ
vÀgÀ®Ä PÉÆÃjzÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, dated : 9-12-97.
CIRCULAR
Sub : Arrest of Civil Servants - regarding.
Section 41 of the Criminal Procedure Code provides that a Police Officer can arrest,
without an order from a Magistrate and without warrant, any person in any of the specified
circumstances mentioned therein. It has been held by the Court that the words 'may arrest'
in this Section shows that the power of arrest is discretionary and that a Police Officer is
not always bound to arrest for cognizable offence. It would, therefore, be desirable that in
cases involving civil servants accused of any offence alleged to have been committed
while acting in the discharge of official duties, the Police Officer may arrest the civil
servant concerned in effective consultation with the Appointing Authority. Such effective
consultations will enable him to get a better insight into the facts and circumstances of the
case and to properly exercise the discretion, to arrest or otherwise, vested in him.
However, where the offence is of a very heinous nature warranting immediate arrest and
consulation with Appointing Authority is not feasible, he may arrest the civil servant and
keep the Appointing Authority informed immediately. All this will ensure that there is due
application of mind before excercise of the discretion to arrest and the Appointing
Authority also enable to take further action to suspend the Government servant and make
necessary alternate arragements for discharge of work and functions of the office he holds.
2. In Joginder Kumar Vs. State of Uttara Pradesh and others, the Supreme Court has
observed as follows :
"Whenever a public servant is arrested, that matter should be intimated to the
superior officers, if possible, before the arrest and in any case, immediately after the
arrest ....."
" In India, Third Report of the National Police Commission at page 32 also
suggested :
" ..... An arrest during the investigation of a cognizable case may be considered
justified into one or other of the following circumstances :-
(i) The case involves a grave offence like murder, dacoity, robbery, rape etc., and it
is necessary to arrest the accused and bring his movements under restraint to infuse
confidence among the terror stricken victims.
(ii) The accused is likely to abscond and evade the processes of law.
(iii) The accused is given to violent behaviour and is likely to commit further
offences unless his movements are brought under restraint.
(iv) The Accused is a habitual offender and unless kept in custoday he is likely to
commit similar offences again. It would be desirable to insist through departmental
instructions that a police officer making an arrest should also record in the case diary
the reasons for making the arrest, thereby clarifying his conformity to the specified
guidelines...."
" The above guidelines are merely the incidents of personal liberty guaranteed under
the Constitution of India. No arrest can be made because it is lawful for the Police
Officer to do so. The existence of the power to arrest is one thing. The justification
for the exercise of it is quite another. The Police Officer must be able to justify the
arrest apart from his power to do so. Arrest and detention in police lock-up of a
person can cause incalculable harm to the reputation and self-esteem of a person. No
arrest can be made in a routine manner on a mere allegation of commission of an
offence made against a person. It would be prudent for a Police Officer in the interest
of protection of the Constitutional rights of a citizen and perhaps in his own interest
that no arrest should be made without a reasonable satisfaction reached after some
investigation as to the genuineness and bona fides of a complaint and a reasonable
belief both as to the person's complicity and even so as to the need to effect arrest.
Denying a person of his liberty is a serious matter. The recommendations of the
Police Commission merely reflect the constitutional concomitants of the
fundamental right to personal liberty and freedom. A person is not liable to arrest
merely on the suspicion of complicity in an offence. There must be some reasonable
justification in the opinion of the officer effecting the arrest that such arrest is
necessary and justified. Except in heinous offences, an arrest must be avoided if a
police officer issues notice to person to attend the Station House and not to leave
Station without permission would do."
" These rights are inherent in Articles 21 and 22(1) of the Constitution and require to
be recognised and scrupulously protected. For effective enforcement of these
fundamental rights, we issue the following requirments :
1. An arrested person being held in custody is entitled, if he so requests to have one
friend relative or other person who is knows to him or likely to take an interest in his
welfare told as far as is practicable that he has been arrested and where is being
detained.
2. The Police Officer shall inform the arrested person when he is brought to the
police station of this right.
3. An entry shall be required to be made in the Diary as to who was informed of the
arrest. These protections from power must be held to flow from Articles 21 and
22(1) and enforced strictly."
"The above requirements shall be followed in all cases of arrest till legal provisions
are made in this behalf. These requirements shall be in addition to the rights of the
arrested persons found in the various Police Manuals."
"These requirements are not exhaustive. The Directors General of Police of all the
States in India shall issue necessary instructions requiring due observance of these
requirements. In addition, departmental instruction shall also be issued that a police
officer making an arrest should also record in the cse diary, the reasons for making
arrest."
3. Home and Transport Department and the Director General of Police may issue
suitable instructions and bring the contents of this Circular to the notice of all the
concerned Police Officers.
Sd/-
B.K. BHATTACHARYA
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 24÷Š1Š98.
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ CzsÀåPÀëvÉAiÀÄ°è gÀa¹zÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
2. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 35 J¸ïrE 86, ¢£ÁAPÀ 7Š1Š1987.
3. ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 4 J¸ïrE 95, ¢£ÁAPÀ 21Š2Š1995.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ AiÀiÁªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛUÉÆ½¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ JµÀÄÖ
CªÀ¢üAiÀÄªÀgÉUÉ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À§ºÀÄzÉA§ EvÁå¢AiÀÄ §UÉÎ G¯ÉèÃR (1)gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è
PÉ®ªÉÇAzÀÄ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ (¹.¹.J) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 10gÀ G¥À¤AiÀÄªÀÄ (6) C£ÀÄß
F PÉ¼ÀUÉ GzÀÞj¹zÉ:Š
"Where a Government servant has been suspended by an authority other than
Government and final orders in the inquiry pending against him have not been
passed within a period of six months from the date of order of suspension, the case
shall be reported to Government for such orders as it may deem fit."
3. PÀArPÉŠ1 gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š7Š1985gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À

CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ PÁ®«ÄwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀzÉ, CzÀ£ÀÄß «Æj CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß, ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä C£ÀÄPÀÆ®ªÁUÀ®Ä, CªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ²ð¹,
¸ÀÆPÀÛ ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄì ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä, ªÉÄÃ¯É (2)gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 7Š1Š1987gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ C¥ÀgÀ
ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ CzsÀåPÀëvÉAiÀÄ°è ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
4. ªÉÄÃ¯É (4)gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 28Š10Š1995gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è, ¸ÀzÀj ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÀ PÁAiÀÄð«zsÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß «ªÀj¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
5. ¸ÀzÀj ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ²ðPÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÁUÀ ¸ÀA¥ÀÇtð ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¤ÃqÀÄwÛ®èzÉÃ EgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ UÀªÀÄ¤¸À¯ÁVzÉ. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ, ¸ÀzÀj ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À
§UÉÎ ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß F ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÉ ®UÀwÛ¹zÀ £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉAiÀÄ°è ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀgÉAiÀÄÄªÀ ¸À¨sÁ
¸ÀÆZÀ£Á ¥ÀvÀæzÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ ¤ÃqÀ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð : PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
PÉÆÃgÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
CªÀ¢ü «ÆjzÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ
CzsÀåPÀëvÉAiÀÄ°è gÀa¹zÀ ¸À«ÄwUÉ ªÀiÁ»w ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ £ÀªÀÄÆ£É
E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ :
PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðj D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀégÀÆ¥ÀªÀ£ÀÄß
¸ÀASÉå £ËPÀgÀ£À ¸ÀégÀÆ¥À : UÉÆ½¹zÀ UÀt£ÉUÉ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À
ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀAQë¥ÀÛ ¢£ÁAPÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À¨ÉÃPÉ?
¥ÀzÀ£ÁªÀÄ «ªÀgÀ CxÀªÁ ¨ÉÃqÀªÉÃ JA§ÄªÀ µÀgÁ
E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ
C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ
1 2 3 4 5 6
¸À»/÷Š
C§ÄÝ¯ï R¢Ãgï
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀºÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
¹.D.¸ÀÄ.E. (¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ)
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï«¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ CzsÀåPÀëvÉAiÀÄ°è gÀa¹zÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
2. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 35 J¸ïrE 86, ¢£ÁAPÀ 7Š1Š1987.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 10gÀ, G¥À¤AiÀÄªÀÄ (6)gÀ PÁ®«ÄwUÉ CAnPÉÆ¼ÀîzÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃTvÀ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå:(2) ªÀÄvÀÄÛ (3)gÀ°è ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÀ ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ±ÀðPÀ ¸À«Äw ªÀÄÄAzÉ
ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀªÁUÀÄªÀAvÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ 24Š1Š98gÀ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÉ.
2. ¸ÀzÀj £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉAiÀÄ°è PÉ®ªÉÇAzÀÄ CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃ¥ÀðqÉ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä GzÉÝÃ²¹zÀÄÝ, ¥ÀjµÀÌj¹zÀ
£ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉAiÀÄÄ F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉAiÀÄ°è, ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀgÉAiÀÄÄªÀ ¸À¨sÁ ¸ÀÆZÀ£Á
¥ÀvÀæzÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð : PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
PÉÆÃgÀ¯ÁVzÉ :Š
CªÀ¢ü «ÆjzÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå

PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ CzsÀåPÀëvÉAiÀÄ°è gÀa¹zÀ ¸À«ÄwUÉ ªÀiÁ»w ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ £ÀªÀÄÆ£É
E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ :
PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðj D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ E¯ÁSÁ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀégÀÆ¥ÀªÀ£ÀÄß
¸ÀASÉå £ËPÀgÀ£À ¸ÀégÀÆ¥À : UÉÆ½¹zÀ «ZÁgÀuÉ: «ZÁgÀuÉ UÀt£ÉUÉ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ
ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ¸ÀAQë¥ÀÛ ¢£ÁAPÀ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ¥ÁægÀA¨sÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «ªÀgÀ ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ¹®èzÉÃ ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À¨ÉÃPÉ?
¥ÀzÀ£ÁªÀÄ AiÀÄ EzÀÝgÉ CxÀªÁ ¨ÉÃqÀªÉÃ JA§ÄªÀ
¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ PÁgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ §UÉÎ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ µÀgÁ
ºÀAvÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ
C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
¸À»/÷Š
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå:r¦JDgï 6 ¸ÉÃE« 96, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢. 6£ÉÃ K¦æ¯ï 98
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼À°è Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ¨ÁQ EzÁÝUÀ CzÉÃ
DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ªÀÄgÀÄ
G¯ÉèÃR : 1. ¢£ÁAPÀ 2£ÉÃ r¸ÉA§gï 1997gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå r¦JDgï 5 ¸ÉÃE« 96.
1. ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ¨ÁQ EzÁÝUÀ CzÉÃ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À
ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è£À ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀzÉÃ EgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÉ. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ, ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ PÀlÄÖ¤nÖ£À PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ F
ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¥ÀÅ£ÀB ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ. PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀzÉÃ EzÀÝ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀ£ÀÄß
ºÉÆuÉUÁgÀgÀ£ÁßV ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁUÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ JAzÀÄ w½¹zÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 3 ¸ÉÃE« 96, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢: 24£ÉÃ K¦æ¯ï 98
«µÀAiÀÄ : PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½,
1957 gÀrAiÀÄ°è ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ªÀøvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ
¤ªÀøvÀÛ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ : 1. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : fJr 3 ¹JDgï 57, ¢£ÁAPÀ 14Š12Š1957.
2. C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå : fJr 28 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 69, ¢£ÁAPÀ 12Š12Š1973.
3. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 5 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 79, ¢£ÁAPÀ 8Š7Š1981.
9. C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 6 ¸ÉÃE« 95, ¢£ÁAPÀ 16Š3Š1995.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ C¥Á¢vÀ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À §UÉÎ ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ, PÁ®PÁ®PÉÌ, ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ªÉÄÃ°£À 1 jAzÀ 6 gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀUÀ¼À°è ¤ÃrzÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À ¸ÁgÁA±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß,
ªÉÄÃ¯É 7gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 30Š12Š1986gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. ªÉÄÃ¯É 11gÀ°è
G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 31Š6Š1997gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è, ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀ, £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ
CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ºÁUÀÆ CzÀgÀ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï CªÀ¯ÉÆÃPÀ£É ªÀÄvÀÄÛ G¸ÀÄÛªÁj §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
3. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11gÀ G¥À ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ (2)C£ÀÄß, G¥À ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ (5)gÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ N¢PÉÆAqÀAvÉ, M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À
«gÀÄzÀÞ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À §UÉÎ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ, vÁ£ÉÃ ¸ÀévÀB «ZÁj¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ
CxÀªÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä M§â «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß £ÉÃ«Ä¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ.
4. ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ MAzÀÄ ¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå
ªÁrPÉAiÀiÁVzÉ. DzÀgÉ, ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, CªÀgÀ ¢£À¤vÀåzÀ PÉ®¸ÀUÀ¼À°è ¤gÀvÀgÁVgÀÄªÀÅzÀjAzÀ
ºÁUÀÆ ºÀ®ªÀÅ EvÀgÉ PÁgÀtUÀ½AzÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀéjvÀªÁV (expeditiously)
¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ½¸ÀÄwÛ®èªÉA§ «µÀAiÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÉ. ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ UÀA©üÃgÀ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ (grave misconduct), UÀA©üÃgÀ ¤®ðPÀëvÉ,
(grave negligence) DyðPÀ £ÀµÀÖ, CzÀgÀ®Æè ºÀt zÀÄgÀÄ¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀ, ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ªÀiÁvÀæ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ
C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÆß ¸ÀºÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉÃ²¸À¯ÁVzÉ :÷Š
(C) ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä, «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÁV
£ÉÃ«Ä¸À§ºÀÄzÁzÀ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ ¸ÀPÁðj C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À MAzÀÄ ¥ÀnÖ
(panel) AiÀÄ£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀ PÁAiÀÄð «zsÁ£ÀzÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ vÀAiÀiÁj¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
(D) LlA (C) gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ (panel) AiÀÄ°è ¸ÉÃj¸À®Ä ¤ªÀøvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀjAzÀ
¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ;
(E) ¤ªÀøvÀÛ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ, ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÁ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ) ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. F GzÉÝÃ±ÀPÁÌV, ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ
E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ) ««zsÀ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ½AzÀ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀÆa¸ÀÄªÁUÀ, DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ, CAvÀºÀ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ,
E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è ºÉÆA¢zÀ C£ÀÄ¨sÀªÀ:¥Áæ«ÃtåvÉ ºÁUÀÆ CªÀgÀ
¥ÁæªÀiÁtÂPÀvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß zÀørüÃPÀj¹PÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. F jÃw ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ¹éÃPÀj¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, ¥Àj²Ã°¹,
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ) MAzÀÄ ªÁå¥ÀPÀ ¥ÀnÖ (Master
Panel) ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. F ªÁå¥ÀPÀ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ°è PÁ®PÁ®PÉÌ ºÉÆ¸À ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¸ÉÃj¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ. AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ E¯ÁSÉ, ¤ªÀøvÀÛ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß, «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV,
ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV CxÀªÁ zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¸À®Ä, ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä
Eaá¹zÀ°è, F ªÁå¥ÀPÀ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ°è ¸ÉÃjgÀÄªÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ§ºÀÄzÀÄ;
(F) M§âgÀÄ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄªÀgÀ ºÉ¸ÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀnÖ (panel)AiÀÄ°è ¸ÉÃj¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÄAZÉ CªÀgÀ °TvÀ
M¦àUÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ;
(G) ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ°è ¸ÉÃj¸À¯ÁzÀ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß, CªÀgÀ ªÀiÁvÀø E¯ÁSÉAiÀiÁVzÀÝ
E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸À¨ÁgÀzÀÄ.
(H) «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÁV £ÉÃªÀÄPÀªÁUÀÄªÀ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ C¢üPÁj, D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ
ºÉÆA¢zÀ ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ zÀeÉðVAvÀ G£ÀßvÀ zÀeÉðAiÀÄ ºÀÄzÉÝ¬ÄAzÀ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ£ÁVgÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ;
(J) LlA (C) jAzÀ (G)gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÁV
£ÉÃ«Ä¹zÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è, CªÀgÀÄ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ PÀbÉÃjAiÀÄ CªÀgÀtzÀ°è
CxÀªÁ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ C¢üÃ£ÀªÁVgÀÄªÀ (²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ UÀÄgÀÄw¹ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸ÀÄªÀ)
C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ PÀbÉÃj CªÀgÀtzÀ°è, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. F GzÉÝÃ±ÀPÁÌV,
FUÁUÀ¯ÉÃ ®¨sÀå«gÀÄªÀ PÀbÉÃjUÀ¼À¯ÉèÃ CªÀjUÉ ¸ÀÜ¼ÁªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁrPÉÆqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ;
(L) ¸ÀzÀj «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ½UÉ, «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ GzÉÝÃ±ÀPÁÌV, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ
PÀbÉÃjAiÀÄ°è FUÁUÀ¯ÉÃ ®¨sÀå«gÀÄªÀ ²ÃWÀæ°¦UÁgÀgÀ:¨ÉgÀ¼ÀZÀÄÑUÁgÀgÀ ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ
¯ÉÃR£À ¸ÁªÀÄVæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ PÀbÉÃj ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ MzÀV¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ;
(M) ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÁUÀ,
¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, MAzÀÄ PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹, D PÁ®«ÄwAiÉÆ¼ÀUÉ
CªÀgÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄV¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÉÝAzÀÄ «¢ü¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. DzÀgÉ, CAvÀºÀ PÁ®«Äw ªÀÄÆgÀÄ
wAUÀ½VAvÀ ºÉZÀÄÑ «ÆgÀ¨ÁgÀzÀÄ;
(O) ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À£ÁßV ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¹Û£À
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ £ÉÃ«Ä¹zÀ°è, CªÀjUÉ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÉUÁV gÀÆ. 5,000 ¸ÀAavÀ
¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß (consolidated remuneration) ¤ÃqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. EzÀ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀ DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ¯ÉèÃ £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. F ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ
ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ½UÉÃ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. F ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
«ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ ¥ÁªÀw ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ;
(CA) CªÀ±Àå«zÀÝ°è, DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀnÖ (Articles of charge) AiÀÄ£ÀÆß ¸ÀºÀ vÀAiÀiÁj¸À®Ä, ¥ÀnÖ
(panel) AiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄ:C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉÆ¼Àî§ºÀÄzÀÄ.
DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¸À®Ä AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ MAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¸ÀªÀiÁ¯ÉÆÃa¸À®àlÖ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ
C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CzÉÃ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÝ®è. F PÉ®¸ÀPÁÌV
¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è gÀÆ.1,000 ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ
zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß (Articles of charges/Statement of imputations of
misconduct) ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, F ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÁªÀw ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ;
(CB) CªÀ±Àå«zÀÝ°è, ¥ÀnÖ (panel) AiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄ : C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÁVAiÀÄÆ (As Presenting Officers) £ÉÃ«Ä¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ. ºÁUÉ £ÉÃ«Ä¸À¯ÁzÀ
¤ªÀøvÀÛ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ gÀÆ. 3,000 ¸ÀAavÀ ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÁªÀwªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. F
¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAr¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ ¥ÁªÀw
ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ;
(PÀ) LlA (O), (CA) ªÀÄvÀÄÛ (DB)zÀ ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£É ªÉZÀÑªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ PÀbÉÃjAiÀÄ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÀ ¯ÉPÀÌ
²Ã¶ðPÉUÉ RZÀÄð ºÁPÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
5. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ : PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ, ªÉÄÃ°£À
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À°ègÀÄªÀ CªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉÆ¼Àî§ºÀÄzÀÄ. ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ
J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
6. F DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ vÀ£Àß ¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š4Š98gÀ n¥ÀàtÂ ¸ÀASÉå : DE 66 : ªÉZÀÑ Š 5:98,
gÀ°è ¤ÃrzÀ ¸ÀºÀªÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀéAiÀÄ ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
PÀ£Áðl gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÕÁ£ÀÄ¸ÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä ªÀÄAdÆgÁw
¤ÃqÀÄªÀ §UÉUÉ ªÀÄgÀÄ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ, PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå (1) ªÀÄvÀÄÛ (2)gÀ°è£À C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀUÀ¼À°è, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ
«gÀÄzÀÞ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä ¨sÀæµÁÖZÁgÀ ¤gÉÆÃzsÀ C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄ, 1947gÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 6
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ zÀAqÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÀiÁ ¸ÀA»vÉ 1973gÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 197gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄzÀ §UÉÎ
ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß »AvÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÉ.
3. ¸ÀªÉÇðÃ£ÀßvÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ jmï Cfð (Qæ«Ä£À¯ï) ¸ÀASÉåUÀ¼ÀÄ : 340Š343:93 «¤Ãvï £ÁgÁAiÀÄuï
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ AiÀÄÆ¤AiÀÄ£ï D¥sï EArAiÀiÁ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÀgÀÄ (1997 (10) ¸ÀÄ¦æÃªÀiï lÄqÉŠ476)
¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¢£ÁAPÀ 18Š2Š97 gÀAzÀÄ ¤ÃrzÀ wÃ¦ð£À GzsÀøvÀ ¨sÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹zÉ :
" Time limit of three months for grant of sanction for prosecution must be strictly adhered to.
However, additional time of one month may be allowed where consultation is required with
the Attorney General (A.G) or any other Law officer in the A.G's Office."
4. ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ºÀÆqÀ®Ä C£ÀÄªÀÄw ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß, ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ
¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ vÀ£Àß ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À¯ÁzÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ
£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ºÀÆqÀ®Ä ªÉÄÃ¯ÉÆßÃlPÉÌ ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ DzsÁgÀUÀ½ªÉ JAzÀÄ ªÀÄ£ÀzÀlÄÖ
ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
5. ¨sÀæµÁÖZÁgÀ ¤gÉÆÃzsÀ C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄ, 1988gÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 19gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ AiÀiÁªÀ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðj CxÀªÁ
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÉÆqÀ£É ªÀeÁ ªÀiÁqÀ§ºÀÄzÉÆÃ CAxÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ºÀAvÀzÀ°è ºÁUÀÆ
E¤ßvÀgÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ªÀåQÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ ªÀeÁ ªÀiÁqÀ§ºÀÄzÉÆÃ CAxÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è D
¥Áæ¢üPÁj ªÀÄvÀÄÛ zÀAqÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÀiÁ ¸ÀA»vÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 197gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ, AiÀiÁªÀ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀ CxÀªÁ
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÉÆqÀ£É ªÀeÁ ªÀiÁqÀ§ºÀÄzÉÆÃ CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ºÀAvÀzÀ°è ªÉÄÃ¯É
£ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹zÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß, ªÉÄÃ¯É PÁtÂ¹gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀªÉÇðÃ£ÀßvÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ wÃ¦ð£À°è
ªÀåPÀÛ¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ PÁ®«ÄwUÀ¼À°è ¥ÀÇgÉÊ¹ CAwªÀÄ ¤tðAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CzÀ£ÀÄß
G®èAX¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀ®è J£ÀÄßªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹zÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀrAiÀÄ°è PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä C¢üPÁj
ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀàµÀÖªÁV UÀªÀÄ¤¸À¨ÉÃPÁVzÉ.
6. ¸ÀªÉÇðÃ£ÀßvÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ, ªÉÄÃ¯É GzÀÞj¹zÀ wÃ¦ð£À°è ¤ÃrzÀ ¤zÉðÃ±À£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV
¥Á°¸À®Ä, ¨sÀæµÁÖZÁgÀ ¤gÉÆÃzsÀ C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄ, 1988gÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 19 ºÁUÀÆ zÀAqÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÀiÁ ¸ÀA»vÉAiÀÄ
¥ÀæPÀgÀt 197 gÀrAiÀÄ°è PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä C¢üPÁgÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ (authorities vested with
the power to santion prosecution) EªÀgÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ ¥Á®£ÉUÁV vÀgÀ®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ : PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÆÃjzÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉ UÀlÖ®Ä ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
3. DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 35 J¸ïrE 86, ¢£ÁAPÀ 7÷Š1Š87.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ, PÀvÀðªÀå ¤®ðPÀë åvÉ, ºÀtzÀ zÀÄgÀÄ¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀ, C¥À«¤AiÉÆÃUÀ,
¨sÀæµÁÖZÁgÀzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥À ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀ C£ÉÃPÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ºÀ®ªÁgÀÄ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÁ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ ¨ÁQ EzÀÄÝ, CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀéjvÀUÀw¬ÄAzÀ ¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ, PÁ®PÁ®PÉÌ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ
1 jAzÀ 10 gÀ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£É:ªÀiÁUÀðzÀ±Àð£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÉ.
2. G¯ÉèÃTvÀ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå : (9)gÀ°è£À, ¢£ÁAPÀ 28Š8Š96gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ
¸À°è¸À¯ÁUÀÄªÀ zÀÆgÀÄUÀ¼À §UÉÎ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥ÁæxÀ«ÄPÀ vÀ¤SÉ £ÀqÉ¹, zÀÆgÀÄUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀvÁåA±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
EgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯ÉÆßÃlPÉÌ PÀAqÀÄ§AzÀ°è ªÀiÁvÀæ, zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ ¥ÀnÖ, EvÁå¢ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV ²¸ÀÄÛ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ½UÉ:¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÉÝAzÀÆ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ
¤ªÀøwÛ ºÉÆAzÀÄªÀ PÀ¤µÀÖ 2 CxÀªÁ 3 wAUÀ¼À ¥ÀÇªÀðzÀ°è ¸ÀzÀj zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ²¸ÀÄÛ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ : ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ
PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÉÝAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
3. G¯ÉèÃTvÀ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå (10)gÀ°è£À ¢£ÁAPÀ 31Š5Š97gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è, ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß
DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è, £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è ºÁUÀÆ CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ºÁUÀÆ ¨ÁQ
EgÀÄªÀ ²¹Û£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À ¥ÀæUÀwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï CªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ºÁUÀÆ G¸ÀÄÛªÁj (Monitoring) §UÉUÉ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀÄvÁÛ, ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ DgÀA©ü¹, ªÀÄÄV¸À®Ä ««zsÀ ºÀAvÀUÀ½UÁV UÀjµÀ× 21 wAUÀ¼À
PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÉ.
4. ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÀÄZÀÑj¸ÀÄvÁÛ, ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ CT® ¨sÁgÀvÀ
¸ÉÃªÉUÀ½UÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ºÁUÀÆ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ
¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞzÀ ²¹Û£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ
E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄªÁUÀ, F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ :
(J) ªÉÄÃ¯É «ªÀj¹zÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸À°è¹zÀ zÀÆgÀÄ CxÀªÁ ªÀgÀ¢ ¹.N.r. ªÀgÀ¢UÀ¼ÀÆ
¸ÉÃjzÀAvÉ, EªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥Àj²Ã°¸ÀzÉÃ £ÉÃgÀªÁV ¹§âA¢
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÁgÀzÀÄ. CªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ªÀgÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ;
(©) LlA (J)gÀ°è ºÉÃ½zÀAvÉ, ¥Àj²Ã°¹, ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸À¨ÉÃPÉÃ? CxÀªÁ ¨ÉÃqÀªÉÃ?
JA§ÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ MAzÀÄ ¤¢ðµÀÖ
wÃªÀiÁð£ÀPÉÌ §gÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ;
(¹) ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¹¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ wÃªÀiÁð¤¹zÀ°è, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÉÃ;
PÀgÀqÀÄ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉAiÀÄ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ «ªÀgÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖ (Articles of charges and statement of
imputations of misconduct) EvÁå¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ªÀÄÆ®
zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ;
(r) ªÀAiÉÆÃ¤ªÀøwÛAiÀÄ CAa£À°ègÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è, ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß
DgÀA©ü¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ, CªÀgÀÄ ¤ªÀøwÛ ºÉÆAzÀ°gÀÄªÀ PÉ®ªÉÃ ¢ªÀ¸ÀUÀ¼À CxÀªÁ ªÁgÀUÀ¼À ªÀÄÄAZÉ
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉUÉ ºÀ®ªÀÅ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄwÛªÉ. EAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀjÃ²Ã°¹, CªÀ±Àå PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸À®Ä, ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±À ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ, CAvÀºÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ ªÀÄÄAZÉAiÉÄÃ CAzÀgÉ, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ C¢üPÁj ªÀAiÉÆÃ¤ªÀøwÛ ºÉÆAzÀÄªÀ
PÀ¤µÀÖ DgÀÄ wAUÀ¼À ªÀÄÄAZÉAiÉÄÃ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
¸À»/÷Š
¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 9 ¸ÉÃE« 98. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
3. DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 35 J¸ïrE 86, ¢£ÁAPÀ 7÷Š1Š87.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ, PÀvÀðªÀå ¤®ðPÀë åvÉ, ºÀtzÀ zÀÄgÀÄ¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀ, C¥À«¤AiÉÆÃUÀ,
¨sÀæµÁÖZÁgÀzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥À ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀ C£ÉÃPÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ºÀ®ªÁgÀÄ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÁ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ ¨ÁQ EzÀÄÝ, CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀéjvÀUÀw¬ÄAzÀ ¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ, PÁ®PÁ®PÉÌ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ
1 jAzÀ 10 gÀ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£É:ªÀiÁUÀðzÀ±Àð£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÉ.
2. G¯ÉèÃTvÀ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå : (9)gÀ°è£À, ¢£ÁAPÀ 28Š8Š96gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ
¸À°è¸À¯ÁUÀÄªÀ zÀÆgÀÄUÀ¼À §UÉÎ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥ÁæxÀ«ÄPÀ vÀ¤SÉ £ÀqÉ¹, zÀÆgÀÄUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀvÁåA±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
EgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯ÉÆßÃlPÉÌ PÀAqÀÄ§AzÀ°è ªÀiÁvÀæ, zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ ¥ÀnÖ, EvÁå¢ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV ²¸ÀÄÛ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ½UÉ:¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÉÝAzÀÆ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ
¤ªÀøwÛ ºÉÆAzÀÄªÀ PÀ¤µÀÖ 2 CxÀªÁ 3 wAUÀ¼À ¥ÀÇªÀðzÀ°è ¸ÀzÀj zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ²¸ÀÄÛ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ : ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ
PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÉÝAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
3. G¯ÉèÃTvÀ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå (10)gÀ°è£À ¢£ÁAPÀ 31Š5Š97gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è, ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß
DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è, £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è ºÁUÀÆ CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ºÁUÀÆ ¨ÁQ
EgÀÄªÀ ²¹Û£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À ¥ÀæUÀwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï CªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ºÁUÀÆ G¸ÀÄÛªÁj (Monitoring)
§UÉUÉ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀÄvÁÛ, ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ DgÀA©ü¹, ªÀÄÄV¸À®Ä ««zsÀ ºÀAvÀUÀ½UÁV UÀjµÀ× 21 wAUÀ¼À
PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÉ.
4. ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÀÄZÀÑj¸ÀÄvÁÛ, ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ CT® ¨sÁgÀvÀ
¸ÉÃªÉUÀ½UÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ºÁUÀÆ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ
¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞzÀ ²¹Û£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ
E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄªÁUÀ, F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ :
(J) ªÉÄÃ¯É «ªÀj¹zÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸À°è¹zÀ zÀÆgÀÄ CxÀªÁ ªÀgÀ¢ ¹.N.r. ªÀgÀ¢UÀ¼ÀÆ
¸ÉÃjzÀAvÉ, EªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥Àj²Ã°¸ÀzÉÃ £ÉÃgÀªÁV ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÁgÀzÀÄ. CªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ªÀgÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ;
(©) LlA (J)gÀ°è ºÉÃ½zÀAvÉ, ¥Àj²Ã°¹, ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸À¨ÉÃPÉÃ? CxÀªÁ
¨ÉÃqÀªÉÃ? JA§ÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ MAzÀÄ
¤¢ðµÀÖ wÃªÀiÁð£ÀPÉÌ §gÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ;
(¹) ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¹¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ wÃªÀiÁð¤¹zÀ°è, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÉÃ;
PÀgÀqÀÄ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉAiÀÄ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ «ªÀgÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖ (Articles of charges and statement of
imputations of misconduct) EvÁå¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ªÀÄÆ®
zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ;
(r) ªÀAiÉÆÃ¤ªÀøwÛAiÀÄ CAa£À°ègÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è, ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß
DgÀA©ü¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ, CªÀgÀÄ ¤ªÀøwÛ ºÉÆAzÀ°gÀÄªÀ PÉ®ªÉÃ ¢ªÀ¸ÀUÀ¼À CxÀªÁ ªÁgÀUÀ¼À ªÀÄÄAZÉ
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉUÉ ºÀ®ªÀÅ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄwÛªÉ. EAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀjÃ²Ã°¹, CªÀ±Àå PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸À®Ä, ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±À ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ, CAvÀºÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ ªÀÄÄAZÉAiÉÄÃ CAzÀgÉ, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ C¢üPÁj ªÀAiÉÆÃ¤ªÀøwÛ ºÉÆAzÀÄªÀ
PÀ¤µÀÖ DgÀÄ wAUÀ¼À ªÀÄÄAZÉAiÉÄÃ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
¸À»/÷Š
¸ÀASÉå : ¹C ¸ÀÄE 3 ¸ÉÃE« 98. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
«µÀAiÀÄ : Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ½¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, ZÁeïð¶Ãl£ÀÄß
zÁR°¸ÀÄªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ ¨Áj CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR : C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå : r¦JDgï 13 J¸ïrE 85, ¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š7Š1985.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ AiÀiÁªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛUÉÆ½¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ JµÀÄÖ CªÀ¢üUÉ
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀj¸À§ºÀÄzÉAzÀÄ EvÁå¢UÀ¼À §UÉÎ ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š7Š1985gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ
eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è PÉ®ªÉÇAzÀÄ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ªÀiÁrzÀ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À §UÉÎ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¨ÁQ ElÄÖ
(pending investigation into criminal allegations against a Government servant) CªÀ£À£ÀÄß
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ MAzÀÄ ¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå ªÁrPÉAiÀiÁVzÉ. vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ½¹, ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ
£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ZÁeïð¶Ãl£ÀÄß zÁR®Ä ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±À ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è
(CAzÀgÉ, vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¹, £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è eÁeïð¶Ãl£ÀÄß zÁR®Ä ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ £ÀqÀÄ«£À
CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è) ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š7Š85gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è£À
ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀAvÉ ¥Àj²Ã°¹, CªÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀÄªÀ (Qæ«Ä£À¯ï) vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¨ÁQ ElÄÖ,
CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß gÀzÀÄÝUÉÆ½¹, ¥ÀÅ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ (reinstate) ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä CªÀPÁ±À«gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. EAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è
vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ½¹, ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ZÁeïð¶Ãl£ÀÄß zÁR°¹zÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è D¥Á¢vÀ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ¥ÀÅ£ÀB CAzÀgÉ, JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ ¨Áj CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è EqÀ¨ÉÃPÉÃ? J£ÀÄßªÀ §UÉÎ ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¹, ¸ÀÆPÀÛ
¤tðAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîwÛ®è J£ÀÄßªÀ «µÀAiÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÉ.
3. vÀ¤SÉ ªÀÄÄV¹ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ZÁeïð¶Ãmï ¸À°è¹zÀÝgÉ, ªÉÄÃ¯ÉÆßÃlPÉÌ
(prima facie) CªÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ªÀiÁrgÀÄªÀ zÉÆÃµÁ gÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼ÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ AiÉÆÃUÀåªÁzÀzÀÄÝ JAzÀxÀð.
CAxÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è D £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀj¹PÉÆAqÀÄ ºÉÆÃUÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀªÀÄAd¸ÀªÀ®è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ªÀÄÄVzÀÄ wÃªÀiÁð£À §gÀÄªÀ vÀ£ÀPÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è EqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ. EAvÀºÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÉ ¨ÁQ ElÄÖ (pending trial) D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß
JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ ¨Áj CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ®Ä AiÀiÁªÀ CqÀZÀuÉAiÀÄÆ EgÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.
4. ªÉÄÃ¯É «ªÀj¹zÀ »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è, M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ªÀiÁrzÀ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À §UÉÎ
vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¨ÁQ ElÄÖ, CªÀ£À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£Àgï£ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁrzÀÝ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è (in a case where a Government
servant has been reinstated pending investigation into criminal allegation against him) vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ½¹, CªÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ZÁeïð¶Ãl£ÀÄß zÁR°¹zÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è, CAvÀºÀ
D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£ÀB CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¨ÉÃPÉÃ? J£ÀÄßªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ¥Àj²Ã°¹,
¸ÀÆPÀÛ ¤tðAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
5. ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ J¯Áè ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ F
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
©.PÉ. ¨sÀmÁÖZÁAiÀÄð
¸ÀASÉå : ¯Á 98 J¯ïJJA 98. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
C£À¢üPÀøvÀ n¥ÀàtÂ
«µÀAiÀÄ : PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ
1957gÀrAiÀÄ°è ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ªÀøvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄUÀ½UÉ ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ
§UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR : 1. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 3 ¸ÉÃE« 96, ¢ : 24.4.98.
2. ¸ÀªÀÄ¸ÀASÉå : ¢ : 18Š7Š98, 11Š11Š98 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 23Š11Š98.
ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ «µÀAiÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ G¯ÉèÃRUÀ¼À£ÀéAiÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ GZÀá£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ f¯Áè ¸ÀPÁðj
ªÀQÃ®gÀÄUÀ½AzÀ ¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¯ÁVgÀÄªÀ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄUÀ¼À ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «¼Á¸ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀÆPÀÛ
PÀæªÀÄPÁÌV EzÀgÉÆA¢UÉ ®UÀwÛ¹ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹PÉÆqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
G¯ÉèÃR (1)gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¤ªÀøvÀÛ
£ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄUÀ¼À ¸ÀºÀªÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÉÃgÀªÁV DAiÀiÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄªÀgÉÃ ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÁßV
£ÉÃ«Ä¹PÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀAvÉ ¸À®ºÉ ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. ºÁUÀÆ £ÉÃ«Ä¹PÉÆAqÀ£ÀAvÀgÀ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÉ ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¤ÃqÀÄªÀAvÉ PÉÆÃgÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
¸À»/÷Š
VÃvÁgÀªÉÄÃ±ï
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üÃ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ (DqÀ½vÀŠ1)
LIST SHOWING THE NAMES AND ADDRESS OF THE RETIRED JUDICIAL
OFFICERS
SI. Name of the Judicial Address :
No. Officer.
1 2 3
(DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGES)
SRIYUTHS :
1. R.C. IJARI. No. 32, IIIrd Cross,
R.M. Vilas Extension,
IInd Stage, Judicial Officers
Layout, Bangalore-560 094.
2. N.S. SANGOLLI. No. 2211, H.A.L. I.T.I.
Stage, 80' Road, Kodihalli
Cross, Bangalore - 8.
3. R.L. AGNITHOTRI. No. 102, A.V. Cross,
Kalidasa Layout,
Srinagar, Bangalore.
4. R. GANESH RAO. 4th Cross,
Sathyanarayanapet, Bellary.
5. S.M. BAGALI. No. 47, Murdhigali,
Bijapur.
6. B. SREENIVASARAO. No. 1172/1, Rajamma line,
Vishnuvardana Road,
Chamarajapur, Mysore-4.
1 2 3
7. S.M. BYADGI. No. 1075/D, 10th Main,
H.A.L., 2nd Stage,
Bangalore-8.
Ph:5262578.
8. S. ANANTHA MURTHY. No. 565/1, 7th B Main
Road, HAL, 2nd Stage,
Bangalore-8.
Ph:5285670.
9. K. GOPAL HEGDE No. 64, 11th Cross, Ist
Stage, Indiranagar,
Bangalore-38.
Ph:5250700
10. S.V. TILGUL. No. 1664, 19th Main,
H.A.L. IIIrd Stage,
Bangalore-75.
Ph : 5282008.
11. K.R. VAIDYA. No. 3-A, RMV, IInd Stage,
Bangalore - 94.
Ph : 3410475.
12. KUMARA GOWDA. No. 499, 54th Cross,
12th Main, III Block,
Rajajinagar, Bangalore - 10.
Ph : 3304778.
13. UMESH SHETTY .H. Ibroze Apartments,
Kodial bail, Mangalore-3.
14. H.C. LAKSHMINARASIMIAH No. 453, 12th Main,
2nd Stage, Indira Nagar,
Bangalore - 38.
Ph : 5257033.
15. K. ISHWAR BHAT. No. 2, Channakeshava
Nilaya, 13th Main,
2nd MMC Layout,
Vijayanagar, Bangalore-40.
Ph : 3352300.
16. T. ABDUL MUZEER. No. 32, 2nd Cross,
Lazar Layout, Frezer town,
Bangalore-5.
Ph : 5468761.
17. S.B. TAMBAD. Retd. Dist. Judge,
Near Old Income
Tax Office,
Vidyanagar, Hubli-21.
18. K.M. MURARI MOUNT. No. 394, Chandrashekaran
Road, BEML Layout,
IIIrd stage, Rajeswari
Nagar, Bangalore-39.
Ph : 2212073.
19. SAWAKAR. Y.R. Retd. Dist. Judge,
No. 409, Ist 'N' Block,
19th 'G' Main, Rajajinagar,
Bangalore-10.
Ph : 3327597.
1 2 3
20. CHANNAVEERAPPA. Retd. Dist. Judge,
Vidhya Nagar, Davanagere.
21. P.C. DAYAPARA MURTHY, Shanthi Nivasa, No. 20,
B.A. BL. Ist Cross, Nehru Nagar,
Bangalore-20.
Ph : Off : 3342734
Res : 32805
22. H.R. NARAYANA RAO, No. 13, Vth Cross,
B.Sc., BL. Swimming Pool Extension,
Malleswaram, Bangalore-3.
23. M. NATARAJA MURTHY, No. 242, 67th Cross,
BA (Honours) BL. 5th Block, Rajajinagr,
Bangalore-10.
Ph : 3350935.
24. SHANKAR RAO, MURGAD Humanabad, Bidar Dist.
25. V. PADMANABHA KEDILAYA. Rtd. Judge,
No. 45, 4th Cross,
Judicial Officers Layout,
Sanjayanagara,
Bangalore - 94.
26. U.S. ARATTI Retd. Dist. Judge,
"Shanthi Dhama",
Main Road, Gandhi Nagar,
Dharwad.
Ph : 743017.
27. D.R. HAMMAGI. Retd. Dist. Judge,
No. 183, Shivanada Nagar,
Navanagar, Hubli.
28. VITALACHARY. Retd. Dist. Judge,
"Suprabhatha"
Laxminagara, Dharwad.
Ph : 347902
29. S.A. PATIL. Retd. Dist. Judge,
"Ashirwad" Rajatgiri,
Dharwad.
Ph : 42774.
30. M.V. SHEELANANTH. Retd. Dist. Judge,
Municipal Quarters,
IIIrd Cross, Hosur,
Hubli.
31. R.P. CHATNI. Retd. Dist. Judge,
Near New Mysore Stores,
Hubli.
32. K.R.K. BHAT. Retd. Dist. Judge,
Attached to the Consumers
court` & who is retiring on
18.3.99. Mangalore.
33. B.C.L. NAGARATH Retd. Dist. Judge,
Kadri Pumpwell, Mangalore.
34. ADDOOR VENKATA RAO. Former Law Secretary &
Retd. Dist. Judge, Mysore.
1 2 3
35. R.C. CARTELINO Retd. Dist. Judge,
Near Indira Nagar,
Bangalore.
36. RAJU Retd. Dist. Judge,
Mandya.
37. B. RAJEEVAHEGDE. No. 247, Ist Phase,
Indira Nagar, Bangalore-38.
38. K. RAMACHANDRAIAH. Rtd. High Court Judge,
Kurunkoti,
Koratagere Taluk,
Tumkur Dist.
39. R.S. MAHENDRA. Rtd. High Court Judge,
'E' Block, Jayanagar,
Bangalore.
40. N. UMAPATHY No. 300-12 A, Main Road,
HAL 2nd Stage,
Indiranagar, Bangalore-38.
41. C.M. BASAVARYA. No. 17, 'Raghunandan'
8th Cross, N.R. Colony,
Bangalore-4.
42. L.P. PATIL, No. 530, 4th Cross,
HMT Layout,
Vishweshwariah Nagar,
Gangenahally, Bangalore.
43. V.K. KULKARNI. No. 981, 4th Block,
Rajajinagar, Bangalore-10.
44. V.H. UPADHYAYA No. 860, 14th Cross,
Mahalakshmi Layout,
Bangalore - 86.
45. H.N. DESHPANDE R.P. Patil Compound,
MAL ADI, Dharwad.
46. B. SHANKAR REDDY No. 60, 10th Main Road,
1st Block, Jayanagar,
Bangalore.
47. S.N. KENCHENNA No. 34, Noris Road,
Richmond Town,
Bangalore-25.
48. N.S. VENUGOPAL No. 642, IC Main Road,
8th Block, Jayanagar,
Bangalore.
49. M.A. SHAMAYENGER No. 177, 3rd Cross,
Judges Colony 2nd Block,
Basaveshwar Nagar,
Bangalore.
50. V.B. HADLI Hadli Buildings, Near
Civil Judge Court,
Station Road, Bijapur.
51. P. GOPALAKRISHNA No. 2218, Kodehalli Cross,
80' Road, HAL 2nd Stage,
Bangalore.
52. S.M. BYADGI Legal Advisor, Bangalore
University, Bangalore.
1 2 3
53. G.B. SOLLAPATTI Shahunagar,
Bijapur.
54. MOHD. ZAHIRUDDIN H.T. No. 106, Kaladi,
Compound Station Bazaar,
Gulbarga.
55. P.B. CHOUGULE. No. 20, 3rd Main Road,
Vasanthanagar, Bangalore.
56. R. GOVINDARAJU No. 145, Seppings Road,
Civil Station, Bangalore.
57. K.T. VENKATARAMANAPPA No. 2, Ist Cross, 2nd Stage,
Indiranagar, Bangalore.
58. S.B. SREENIVASAN No. 1559, Shri Krupa,
V Cross Road, 2nd Block,
Banashankari Ist Stage,
Bangalore - 50.
59. N.T. JANAKIRAM. No. 316, VIth Main Road,
Venkatarangapuram,
Palace Gutthalli, Bangalore-3.
60. SATAVALLI .R. VENKATESH No. 853, HAL 3rd Stage,
MURTHY. I Main, I Block,
Bangalore.
61. S.R. VENKATARAMAN No. 15, Mythir, 2nd Cross,
4th 'C' Block 12th Main,
Koramangala,
Bangalore.
62. VENKATESH PATIL No. 7, Judl. Officers Layout,
Rajamahal Vilas, 2nd Stage,
Bangalore - 94.
63. T.S. LAKSHMINARAYANARAO No. 384, I Cross,
Judges Colony, Matadahalli
Further Extn. R.T. Nagar,
Bangalore - 3.
64. R. VENKATESHMURTHY No. 853, 3rd Stage,
Ist Main, I Block,
Bangalore.
65. V.V. DESHPANDE No. 40 Chidambar Nagar,
Bijapur.
66. MOHD. ASIB. No. 11, Osborne Road,
Ist Cross, S.G. Garden,
Bangalore - 42.
67. G.C. SANJEEVAIAH Christian Colony,
Gubbi-Post, Tumkur Dist.
68. K.R. KODAGNUR Sahunagar, CCB No. 106,
Belgaum.
69. K. KRISHNAIAH Pushpa, 709,
Kuvempunagar,
Mysore.
Sd/-
GEETHA RAMESH
Under Secretary to Govt.,
Law Depat. Admn.-1.
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ:16Š3Š99.
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ°è ºÉ¸Àj¸À¯ÁzÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ ¸ÁQëUÀ¼ÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄAzÉ
ºÁdgÁUÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
G¯ÉèÃR : 1. ¢£ÁAPÀ 14Š12Š1957gÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À £ÀA.fJr (MJA)8¹JDgï.57.
2. ¢£ÁAPÀ 2Š3Š1966gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå : fJr 18 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 66.
3. ¢£ÁAPÀ 16Š9Š74gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå : fJr 57 ¦«¹ 74.
4. ¢£ÁAPÀ 3Š11Š1981gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 466 J£ïJJ¸ï 81.
ªÉÄÃ¯É (1) jAzÀ (4)gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À : ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À°è, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É
ºÀÆrgÀÄªÀ «ZÁgÀuÉ : vÀ¤SÉUÀ¼À°è ªÀiÁ»w, zÁR¯É ºÁUÀÆ C¢üPÀøvÀ ¸ÁQëUÀ¼ÀÄ EvÁå¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß
ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÀÆrgÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À°è, ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ
C¢üPÀøvÀ ¸ÁQë JAzÀÄ ºÉ¸Àj¸À®àlÖªÀjUÉ, «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, ºÀ®ªÁgÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è, ¸ÁPÀë å ¤ÃqÀ®Ä
£ÉÆÃnÃ¸ï PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹zÀÝgÀÆ, CAvÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ ºÁdgÁVgÀÄªÀÅ¢®è J£ÀÄßªÀ «µÀAiÀÄ
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÉ. EzÀjAzÀ, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
EzÀ®èzÉ, EAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸Á©ÃvÁV®èªÉAzÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¸À°è¸ÀÄªÀ ¸ÁzsÀåvÉAiÀÄÆ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
3. ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ, ¹.¹.J ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß gÀa¹gÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ GzÉÝÃ±À,
M§â C¢üPÁgÀAiÀÄ «gÀÄzÀÞ ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀªÀÅ gÀÄdÄªÁvÁVzÉAiÉÄÃ? CxÀªÁ E®èªÉÃ? JA§ §UÉÎ
ªÁ¸ÀÛªÁA±À PÀAqÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÉÃ DzÀÝjAzÀ, DgÉÆÃ¦ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ vÀ£ÀVAvÀ QjAiÀÄ£ÉÃ CxÀªÁ E®èªÉÃ
J£ÀÄßªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¸ÀzÉÃ, «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ºÁdgÁV ¸ÁPÀë å ¤ÃqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆ§â ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀ£À PÀvÀðªÀåªÁVzÉ JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃR (2)gÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 2Š3Š1966gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è FUÁUÀ¯ÉÃ
¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
4. ªÉÄÃ¯É «ªÀj¹zÀ »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è, ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ, ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¨sÁUÀ±ÀB ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¹,
F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ :Š
(1) ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À°è C¢üPÀøvÀ ¸ÁQë ¤ÃqÀ®Ä ºÉ¸Àj¸À®ànÖzÀÄÝ,
«ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ CAvÀºÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ ºÁdgÁUÀ®Ä £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ï ¤ÃrzÀgÉ, CAvÀºÀ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ ºÁdgÁV ¸ÁPÀë å ¤ÃqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ;
(2) CªÀjUÉ «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ ºÁdgÁUÀ®Ä JgÀqÀÄŠªÀÄÆgÀÄ ¨Áj £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ï ¤ÃrzÀÝgÀÆ, ºÁdgÁUÀ¢zÀÝgÉ,
«ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ®¢üPÁjUÉ ¥ÀvÀæ §gÉzÀÄ CAvÀºÀ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ ºÁdgÁUÀ®Ä ¸ÀÆa¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ w½¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ;
(3) D £ÀAvÀgÀªÀÇ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ ¸ÁPÀë å ¤ÃqÀ®Ä ºÁdgÁUÀ¢zÀÝgÉ, CAvÀºÀªÀgÀ
«gÀÄzÀÞ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (£ÀqÀvÉ) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1966gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 3gÀ G®èAWÀ£ÉUÁV
¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ²¸ÀÄÛPÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
4. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ : PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ : E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ F
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ EªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À ºÁUÀÆ «ZÁgÀuÁ
¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀ®Ä ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
¸À»/Š
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ,
1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11(4) ºÁUÀÆ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 12(1)(J)gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁzÀ £ÉÆÃnÃ¹UÉ
GvÀÛj¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÉÆÃqÀ®Ä CªÀPÁ±À PÀ°à¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ
11(4) ºÁUÀÆ 12(1)(J)gÀAvÉ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁUÀÄªÀ £ÉÆÃnÃ¹UÉ GvÀÛj¸ÀÄªÀ ºÀAvÀzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ
zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß MzÀV¸ÀÄªÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ EzÉAiÉÄÃ JA§ÄzÀgÀ §UÉÎ ¸Àà¶ÖÃPÀgÀt PÉÆÃgÀ¯ÁVzÀÄÝ, PÉ®ªÀÅ ²¸ÀÄÛ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ F ºÀAvÀzÀ°è zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÉÆÃqÀ®Ä ºÁUÀÆ CUÀvÀå ©zÀÝ°è, CªÀÅUÀ¼À n¥ÀàtÂ ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä
CªÀPÁ±À ¤ÃqÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀÅzÁV w½zÀÄ §A¢zÉ.
2. ¸ÀªÉÇðÃZÀá £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ GvÀÛgÀ ¥ÀæzÉÃ±À ¸ÀPÁðgÀ ªÀ¸Àð¸ï ±ÀvÀÄæWÀ£ï ¯Á¯ï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÀgÀÄ
(1998.6 J¸ï ¹¹ 651) ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ ¤tðAiÀÄ ¤ÃrzÉ.
" If the appellant did not intend to give the copies of the documents to the respondent, it
should have been indicated to the respondent in writing that he may inspect those
documents. Merely saying that the respondent could have inspected the documents at any
time is not enough. He has to be in formed that the documents of which the copies were
asked for by him may be inspected. The access to record must be assured to him."
3. ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ wÃ¦ð£À »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è DgÉÆÃ¦ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ vÀ£Àß ``«gÀÄzÀÞzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À'' §UÉÎ ¤ÃrgÀÄªÀ
£ÉÆÃnÃ¹£À°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À ¥ÀæwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß D £ÉÆÃnÃ¹UÉ GvÀÛgÀ ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß D¥Á¢vÀ
£ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ MzÀV¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ. ºÁUÉ MzÀV¸À®Ä ¸ÁzsÀå«®èzÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ, DvÀ£ÀÄ ¸ÀzÀj
zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÉÆÃqÀ®Ä §AiÀÄ¹zÀ°è, ¸ÀªÀÄPÀëªÀÄ £ÉÆÃqÀ®Ä CªÀPÁ±À ¤ÃrgÀÄªÀÅzÁV °TvÀªÁV w¼ÀÄªÀ½PÉ
¤ÃqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
4. F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß J¯Áè ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀ®Ä PÉÆÃgÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
¸À»/Š
PÉ.J¯ï. dAiÀÄgÁªÀiï,
Vidhana Soudha,
Bangalore, dated : 23.7.1999.
OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
In the course of reviewing cases of suspension of various departments, there is a common
feature. Officials/officers are suspended and thereafter early action is not taken to start the
disciplinary proceedings or recover funds embezelled by the official despite the prima-facie case
against them.
Attention of Principal Secretaries/Secretaries and Heads of Departments is drawn to the
Circular No. DPAR 14 SEEV 96, dated 31.5.97 in which D.P.A.R. has detailed the procedure to be
followed for suspension and consequent action of finalising enquiries and imposing punishments.
It is necessary to ensure that the procedure and time-frame indicated in this circular are
scrupulously followed.
In the Official Memorandum No. LAW 98 LAM 98, dated 8.3.99, a panel of 69 judges has
been prepared by the Law Department for enabling departments to appoint them as enquiry
officers. This is to ensure that enquiries are conducted with due speed and remedial action taken.
Regular progress report on enquiries/disciplinary proceedings following suspension case
may be sent to me every three months.
Sd/-
Achala Moulik
Additional Chief Secretary
¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 17 ¸ÉÃE« 99 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 1.12.1999
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : C£À¢üPÀÈvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀåªÀºÀj¸ÀÄªÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
G¯ÉèÃR: 1) ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 30 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 79, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 17.4.1979.
2) C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 4 ¸ÉÃE« 89, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 31.1.89.
3) C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: r¦JDgï 3 J¸ïrE 94, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 26.2.94.
C£À¢üPÀÈvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ «¼ÀA§ ªÀiÁqÀzÉÃ ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß
DgÀA©ü¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ D jÃw «¼ÀA§ ªÀiÁrzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ
DgÀA©ü¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ, ªÉÄÃ¯É (1) gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ, ¢£ÁAPÀ; 17.4.1979gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdgÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÀÆqÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ¯ÉÃ
CxÀªÁ ºÀÆrzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, DzÀgÉ CzÀÄ ªÀÄÄVAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀgÉÆ¼ÀUÉ, CAvÀºÀ £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ PÉ®¸ÀPÉÌ ºÁdgÁUÀ®Ä
ªÀÄÄAzÉ §AzÀgÉ, CAvÀºÀ UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdjAiÀÄ CªÀ¢AiÀÄÄ JµÉÖÃ DVgÀ°, CªÀ£À£ÀÄß PÉ®¸ÀPÉÌ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ §UÉÎ
ºÁUÀÆ CªÀ±ÀåªÉ¤¹zÀ°è, CªÀ¤UÉ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ G¯ÉèÃR (2) gÀ°è£À ¢£ÁAPÀ: 31.1.1989 gÀ
C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
3. G¯ÉèÃR (3) gÀ°è£À ¢£ÁAPÀ: 26.2.94gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è, C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁUÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄzÀ §UÉÎ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀPÁ®zÀ°è EAvÀºÀ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¢gÀÄªÀ
C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ªÀÄvÉÆÛªÉÄä ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
4. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ DqÀ½vÀ £ÁåAiÀÄªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄÄ, ªÉÄºÀªÀÄÆzï. PÉ. «gÀÄzÀÞ gÁdå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÀgÀÄ, F
¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è (1996) PÉ.J¸ï.J¯ï.eÉ. 1016, Cfð ¸ÀASÉå: 3351:94 gÀ°è, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 11.9.96 gÀAzÀÄ ¤ÃrzÀ
DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ GzÀÞøvÀ ¨sÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹zÉ.
" With ut-most respect, we dissent from the approach adopted in the said decision of this
Tribunal. No relief is to be granted to an Applicant automatically irrespective of the
Applicant's conduct and the delay involved. Belatedness and laches are the factors to be
considered, apart from other aspects of an Applicant's conduct in relation to the subject
matter of the litigation. We are of the view that the relationship between the Government
employee and the State involves mutual rights and obligations. The rights cannot vest in the
Government employee without a corresponding obligation to attend to the duties. The
service under the State Government is not an open house for anybody to walk in and get out
as he pleases."
5. ªÉÄÃ¯É «ªÀj¹zÀ »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É: C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀUÀ¼À°è ¤ÃrzÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¥ÀÄ£ÀB MwÛ ºÉÃ¼ÀÄvÁÛ, C£À¢üPÀÈvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ «¼ÀA§ ªÀiÁqÀzÉÃ, CAzÀgÉ,
CªÀgÀÄ UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdgÁzÀ vÀPÀët ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ DgÀA©ü¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ªÀÄvÉÆÛªÉÄä ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
6. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ:PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ:E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ F
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀévÀB ¥Á°¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ CªÀgÀªÀgÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ
vÀgÀ®Ä ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
(¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ),
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
«µÀAiÀÄ : E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À°è ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸À¯ÁUÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ
¤ÃqÀ¯ÁUÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ UËgÀªÀzsÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉaÑ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ : ¢£ÁAPÀ: 3.4.74gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå: fJr 4 J¸ïJ¸ïDgï 74.
¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:
E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À°è M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÀÄyð¸ÀÄªÀ
¸À®ÄªÁV, ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ, vÀ£Àß ¥ÀgÀªÁV ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀPÉÌ, M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß
CxÀªÁ ªÀQÃ®gÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV (Presenting Officer), PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt,
¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11(5)(¹) gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ £ÉÃ«Ä¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ. F jÃw
ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸À®àqÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ¢£À¤vÀåzÀ PÀZÉÃj PÀvÀðªÀåUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ F
PÉ®¸ÀªÀ£ÀÆß ¸ÀºÀ ¤ªÀð»¸À¨ÉÃPÁVzÀÄÝ, F jÃw ºÉaÑ£À PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¹zÀ ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ, ªÉÄÃ¯É
NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ°è F PÉ¼ÀUÉ GzÀÞj¹zÀAvÉ ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ®Ä D¸ÀàzÀ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ:-
" Government are pleased to order that remuneration at the rate of 10% of the minimum of
the scale of pay of the Government servant nominated as presenting officer be sanctioned to
him per day of hearing subject to a minimum of Rs. 10/- and maximum of Rs. 25/- per day."
2. ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉaÑ¸ÀÄªÀ «µÀAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¥Àj²Ã°¹, F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉÃ²¹zÉ.
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 15 ¸ÉÃE« 99, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 14£ÉÃ ªÀiÁZïð 2000
3. ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 3.4.1974gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß gÀzÀÄÝUÉÆ½¹, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É
ºÀÆqÀ¯ÁUÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À°è ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ¥ÀgÀªÁV ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀPÉÌ
ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV £ÉÃªÀÄPÀUÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀjUÉ ¤ÃqÀ§ºÀÄzÁzÀ ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ
¢£À MAzÀPÉÌ CªÀgÀ ªÀÄÆ® ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÀ ±ÉÃPÀqÀ 10 gÀªÀgÉUÉ, DzÀgÉ, PÀ¤µÀÖ gÀÆ. 50-00 (LªÀvÀÄÛ) ºÁUÀÆ UÀjµÀ×
gÀÆ. 100-00 (MAzÀÄ £ÀÆgÀÄ) UÀ½UÉ F DzÉÃ±À ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀÄªÀAvÉ
¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
4. F DzÉÃ±ÀªÀÅ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ C¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ ¹§âA¢UÉ C£ÀéAiÀÄªÁUÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.
5. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ:PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ, F
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß vÀªÀÄä C¢üÃ£ÀPÉÆÌ¼À¥ÀqÀÄªÀ ««zsÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ:£ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ
vÀgÀ®Ä PÉÆÃjzÉ.
6. F DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß, DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 16.2.2000gÀ, CzÀgÀ n¥ÀàtÂ ¸ÀASÉå: DE:2674:ªÉ-
5:99 gÀ°è ¤ÃrgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀºÀªÀÄwAiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üÃ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð-2,
¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 8 ¸ÉÃE« 2000-I PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ M¼À¥ÀlÄÖ C¥ÀgÁzsÀPÁÌV zÀAqÀ£ÉUÉ UÀÄjAiÀiÁzÀ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛPÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆa.
G¯ÉèÃR: ¢£ÁAPÀ: 26.6.1996gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 9 ¸ÉÃE« 95.
Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è zÀAqÀ£ÉUÉÆ¼ÀUÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ, D £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ vÀ£ÀUÉ
«¢ü¹zÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ªÉÄÃ®ä£À« ¸À°è¹ zÀAqÀ£ÁzÉÃ±ÀPÉÌ vÀqÉAiÀiÁeÉÕ
¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÁUÀ¯ÁUÀ°Ã, CxÀªÁ ªÉÊAiÀÄQÛPÀ eÁ«ÄÃ¤£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ©qÀÄUÀqÉ DzÉÃ±À ¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÁUÀ¯ÁUÀ°Ã,
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ
14(i) gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ, ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 26.6.96gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 9
¸ÉÃE« 95 gÀ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è zÀAqÀ£ÉUÉ M¼ÀUÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ D £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ vÀ£ÀUÉ
«¢ü¹zÀ zÀAqÀ£É «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ªÉÄÃ®ä£À« ¸À°è¹ PÉ¼ÀV£À £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ zÀAqÀ£É
DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ vÀqÉAiÀiÁeÉÕ ¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÁUÀ¯ÁUÀ° CxÀªÁ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À« EvÀåxÀðzÀ°ègÀÄªÁUÀ eÁ«ÄÃ£ÀÄ
ªÉÄÃ¯É ©qÀÄUÀqÉAiÀiÁzÁUÀ¯ÁUÀ° CxÀªÁ C¥ÀgÁzsÀ ¤tðAiÀÄ vÀqÉ »rzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À¯ÁèUÀ° (in the case of
suspension of conviction) ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ zÉÆÃµÀ ¹¢ÞAiÀiÁVgÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß
¤®A§£ÉAiÀÄ°èqÀÄªÀ ¥Àæ±Éß GzÀã«¸ÀÄªÀÅ¢®è. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ, CAvÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ gÀzÀÄÝ¥Àr¹
ªÀÄvÉÆÛªÉÄä ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ E®è. CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¢£ÁAPÀ: 26.6.1996 gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
¸ÀA. ¹D¸ÀÄE 9 ¸ÉÃE« 95 gÀ°è ¤ÃrzÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀAvÉ PÀæªÀÄ PÉÊUÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
PÉ. J¯ï. dAiÀÄgÁªÀiï
¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 8 ¸ÉÃE« 2000-II PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ «¢ü¹zÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÉÄÃ°£À £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ
¤®A¨sÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°èlÖ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è CªÀgÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR: 1. C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À PÀæªÀiÁAPÀ: r¦JDgï 13 J¸ïrE 85, ¢£ÁAPÀ; 3.7.1985.
2. C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À PÀæªÀiÁAPÀ: r¦JDgï 16 ¸ÉÃE« 89, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 26.6.1989.
3. ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É PÀæªÀiÁAPÀ: ¹D¸ÀÄE 16 ¸ÉÃE« 96, ¢£ÁAPÀ; 21.4.1997.
4. C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À PÀæªÀiÁAPÀ: ¹D¸ÀÄE 2 ¸ÉÃE« 97, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 8.7.1997.
5. C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À PÀæªÀiÁAPÀ: ¹D¸ÀÄE 3 ¸ÉÃE« 98, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 5.8.1998.
EvÀgÉ «µÀAiÀÄUÀ¼À eÉÆvÉUÉ, Qæ«Ä£À¯ï DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ½UÁV £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼À°è «ZÁgÀuÉ
JzÀÄj¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ, ªÉÄÃ¯É (1) gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ, ¢£ÁAPÀ:
3.7.1985gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. ®AZÀ ¤ªÀÄÆð®£Á C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄ CxÀªÁ
E£ÁßªÀÅzÉÃ «µÀAiÀÄPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ vÀ¤SÉUÉ M¼ÀUÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ
¥ÀÄ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ªÉÄÃ¯É (2) ªÀÄvÀÄÛ (3) gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ; 26.6.1989 gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ
eÁÕ¥À£À ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21.4.1997 gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. ¸ÀzÀj C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀr
vÀ¤SÉ CxÀªÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ JzÀÄj¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è EqÀ¨ÁgÀzÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ¨sÁ«¹zÀ°è C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄzÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ, ªÉÄÃ¯É (4) gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¸À¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ:
8.7.1997gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. Qæ«Ä£À¯ï D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À §UÉÎ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¨ÁQ ElÄÖ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÄ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁrzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è, vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÆtðUÉÆ½¹ CªÀ£À
«gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ZÁeïð¶Ãmï zÁR°¹zÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è DvÀ£À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÄ£ÀB CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ°èqÀÄªÀ
§UÉÎ ªÉÄÃ¯É (5) gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 5.8.1998gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è zÀAqÀ£ÉUÉÆ¼ÀUÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ, vÀ£ÀUÉ «¢ü¹zÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ
£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ªÉÄÃ®ä£À« ¸À°è¹, PÉ¼ÀV£À £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ zÀAqÀ£É DzÉÃ±ÀPÉÌ vÀqÉAiÀiÁeÉÕ
¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÁUÀ¯ÁUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À« EvÀåxÀðzÀ°ègÀÄªÁUÀ eÁ«ÄÃ¤£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ©qÀÄUÀqÉ
¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÁUÀ¯ÁUÀ°Ã CxÀªÀ C¥ÀgÁzsÀ ¤tðAiÀÄ vÀqÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À¯ÁèUÀ°Ã (in the cases of
suspension of conviction) CªÀ£À CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß gÀzÀÄÝ¥Àr¹ ªÀÄvÉÛ DvÀ£À£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî§ºÀÄzÉÃ
JA§ §UÉÎ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ºÀ®ªÁgÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸Àà¶ÖÃPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß PÉÆÃgÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀÅzÀjAzÀ, F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ ¸Àà¶ÖÃPÀgÀt
¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ :-
Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è zÀAqÀ£ÉUÉ M¼ÀUÁzÀ £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ¸À°è¹zÀ
ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«AiÀÄ°è C¥ÀgÁzsÀ ¤tðAiÀÄ vÀqÉ»rzÀ DzÉÃ±À DzÀAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è (In the cases of suspension
of conviction) CAvÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞªÀÇ ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÀéAiÀÄ PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉ£ÀÄßªÀ
PÀÄjvÀÄ CzÀgÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹®èªÁzÀÝjAzÀ CAxÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀæªÀÄ
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÉÃ J£ÀÄßªÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ ¸ÀA±ÀAiÀÄ ªÀåPÀÛ¥ÀnÖzÉ. F PÀÄjvÀÄ ¸ÀàµÀÖ£É ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV ¸ÀzÀj
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀV£ÀAvÉ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ PÀArPÉ 3gÀ°è£À ``CxÀªÁ DvÀ£À ªÉÄÃ®ä£À« EvÀåxÀðzÀ°ègÀÄªÁUÀ eÁ«ÄÃ¤£À
ªÉÄÃ¯É ©qÀÄUÀqÉ ¥ÀqÉ¢zÁÝ£É JA§ PÁgÀtPÁÌV'' JA§ ¥ÀzÀUÀ¼À £ÀAvÀgÀ ``CxÀªÁ C¥ÀgÁzsÀ ¤tðAiÀÄ
vÀqÉ»rzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è (in the cases of suspension of conviction)'' JA§ ¥ÀzÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃj¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°èzÁÝUÀ¯ÉÃ ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÁægÀA©ü¹, CªÀgÀÄ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛgÁzÀ
£ÀAvÀgÀ zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀqÉAiÀÄÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR: 1. ¢£ÁAPÀ: 31.5.1997gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 14 ¸ÉÃE« 96.
2. PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸ÉÃªÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀgÀªÀgÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 4.8.2000gÀ ¥ÀvÀæ
¸ÀASÉå: ¦J¸ï¹ 201 ¹J£ïJ¸ï 99.
²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è, £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è ºÁUÀÆ CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è
«¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÄÖªÀ, ¨ÁQ EgÀÄªÀ ²¹Û£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À ¥ÀæUÀwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÄ£Àgï CªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ
CªÀÅUÀ¼À G¸ÀÄÛªÁj §UÉÎ ªÉÄÃ¯É (1) gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ; 31.5.1997gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ
CrAiÀÄ°è M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÀÆqÀ¯ÁzÀ ²¹Û£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀt MAzÀgÀ°è zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ
PÀÄjvÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸ÉÃªÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÉÆA¢UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ E¯ÁSÉ ¸ÀªÀiÁ¯ÉÆÃa¹zÁUÀ, DAiÉÆÃUÀªÀÅ,
ªÉÄÃ¯É (2) gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ; 4.8.2000gÀ vÀ£Àß ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è F PÉ¼ÀUÉ GzÀÞj¹zÀAvÉ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ
ªÀåPÀÛ¥Àr¹zÉ:-
``¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÀÈ¶ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ vÉÆÃlUÁjPÉ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 19.2.2000zÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå:
PÀÈvÉÆÃE 53 PÀÈ¥À« 89 gÀ°è ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÉÇAzÀgÀ°è DgÉÆÃ¦vÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞzÀ 1987-88£ÉÃ ¸Á°£À
DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À §UÉÎ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 31.1.94 gÀAzÀÄ ¤ªÀÈwÛAiÀiÁUÀÄªÀªÀgÉUÀÆ vÀqÉzÀÄ
£ÀAvÀgÀ 1996£ÉÃ ¸Á°£À°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ ¥ÁægÀA©ü¹, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ,
1958gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 214 gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ ¸ÀºÀªÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉÆÃjzÉ.
EwÛÃZÉUÉ F jÃwAiÀÄ ºÀ®ªÁgÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄPÁÌV ¹éÃPÀÈvÀªÁVzÀÄÝ EAvÀºÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ G¥ÀAiÀÄÄPÀÛvÉAiÀÄ §UÉÎ wÃªÀæ aAvÀ£É CUÀvÀå«zÉ JAzÀÄ DAiÉÆÃUÀªÀÅ
¨sÁ«¹zÉ.
F »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è, ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è D¥Á¢vÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ wÃªÀævÀgÀªÁzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ½zÀÄÝ,
CªÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛgÁUÀÄªÀªÀgÉ«UÀÆ zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¸ÀzÉ ¤gÁvÀAPÀªÁV ©lÖ
£ÀAvÀgÀ zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ ¥Àj¥ÁoÀªÀ£ÀÄß E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÁzÀgÀÆ vÀqÉAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀªÀÄAd¸ÀªÉAzÀÄ
DAiÉÆÃUÀªÀÅ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ¥ÀnÖzÉ.
F §UÉÎ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè E¯ÁSÉ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð : ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜjUÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ¤zÉÃð±À£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
ºÉÆgÀr¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ «£ÀAw¸À®Ä ¤zÉÃð²vÀ£ÁVzÉÝÃ£É.''
3. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ : PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸ÉÃªÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ
C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ¤¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ CzÀgÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ GzÀã«¸ÀzÀAvÉ £ÉÆÃrPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä
¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11(2)gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÉ ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR: 1) ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.4.1998gÀ DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 3 ¸ÉÃE« 96.
2) ¢£ÁAPÀ: 8.3.99 ºÁUÀÆ 2.8.99gÀ C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ n¥ÀàtÂUÀ¼À ¸ÀASÉå: ¯Á 98
J¯ïJJA 98.
3) ¢£ÁAPÀ: 25.8.2000 gÀ C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ n¥ÀàtÂ ¸ÀASÉå: ¯Á 15 J¯ïJJA 2000.
4) ¢£ÁAPÀ; 20.9.2000 gÀ C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ n¥ÀàtÂ ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 3 ¸ÉÃE« 96.
1. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ
11gÀ G¥À ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ (2)gÀ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¨sÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÉ¼ÀUÉ GzÀÞj¹zÉ:-
" (2) Whenever the Disciplinary Authority is of the opinion that there are grounds for
inquiring into the truth of any imputation of misconduct or misbehaviour against a
Government servant, it may itself inquire into, or appoint under this rule an authority to
inquire into the truth thereof.
Provided that the appointment of the Lokayukta or an Upalokayukta shall not be made by
any authority other than Government and the appointment of an officer on the staff of the
Lokayukta, shall not be made without the prior concurrence of the Lokayukta."
2. ¸ÀzÀj ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É, ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À°è ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀ£ÀÄß, G¥À ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀ£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜAiÀÄ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
«ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸À®Ä D¸ÀàzÀ EzÉ.
3. ªÉÄÃ¯É (1) gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.4.98gÀ DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ°è, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
(ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ CrAiÀÄ°è ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À°è ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸À®Ä D¸ÀàzÀªÀ£ÀÄß
PÀ°à¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
4. ªÉÄÃ¯É (2) gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 8.3.99 ºÁUÀÆ 2.8.99 gÀ C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ n¥ÀàtÂUÀ¼À ªÀÄÆ®PÀ,
PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À°è «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À£ÁßV:ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÁV
£ÉÃ«Ä¸À§ºÀÄzÁzÀ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÉ.
5. ªÉÄÃ¯É (3) gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ; 25.8.2000 gÀ C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ n¥ÀàtÂAiÀÄ°è, CAvÀºÀ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ
£ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ ¤ÃrzÉ.
6. ªÉÄÃ¯É (4) gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ n¥ÀàtÂAiÀÄ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ PÀArPÉ 5 gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ
£ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð:PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀA¢zÉ.
7. ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É PÉ®¸ÀzÀ MvÀÛqÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÀrªÉÄ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ºÁUÀÆ CzÀjAzÀ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜAiÀÄ°è
¨ÁQ EgÀÄªÀ ««zsÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀéjvÀªÁV «¯ÉÃ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä C£ÀÄªÁUÀ®Ä GzÉÝÃ²¹, ªÉÄÃ°£À PÀArPÉ (1)
gÀ°è GzÀÞj¹zÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀr ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜAiÀÄ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¹
DzÉÃ±À ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä, CªÀgÀ §zÀ®Ä, ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¸À¯ÁzÀ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸À§ºÀÄzÉÃ? J£ÀÄßªÀ §UÉÎ ¥Àj²Ã°¹ ¸ÀÆPÀÛªÉ¤¹zÀ°è ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀ£ÀÄß
«ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À£ÁßV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀ ªÁrPÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉaÑ¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð:
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
8. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ: PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÀArPÉ (7) gÀ°è ¤ÃrzÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ CzÀ£ÀÄß CªÀgÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ
vÀgÀ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ,
1957gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, CªÀgÀªÀjUÉ ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 2(J) gÀ°è £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ("Appointing Authority") J£ÀÄßªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ
GzÀÞj¹zÀAvÉ ªÁåSÁå¤¸À¯ÁVzÉ:-
"2. Interpretation.-
In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires-
(a) 'Appointing Authority' in relation to a Government servant means:-
(i) The authority empowered to make appointments to the Service of which the
Government Servant is for the time being a member or to the grade of the Service in
which the Government Servant is for the time being included, or
(ii) The authority empowered to make appointments to the post which the
Government servant for the time being holds, or
(iii) The authority which appointed the Government servant to such service, grade
or post, as the case may be, whichever authority is the highest authority."
2. ¸ÀzÀj ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 9gÀ G¥À ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ (3)£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ GzÀÞj¹zÉ:-
"9(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in this rule, no penalty specified in clauses (v) to
(viii) of rule 8 shall be imposed by any authority lower than the Appointing Authority."
3. ¸ÀzÀj ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 10gÀ G¥À ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ (1)£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ GzÀÞj¹zÉ:-
"10(1) The Appointing Authority or any authority to which it is sub-ordinate or any other
authority empowered by the Government in this behalf may place a Government servant
under suspension-
(a) where a disciplinary proceeding against him is contemplated or is pending; or
(b) where a case against him in respect of any criminal offence is under investigation
or trial;
Provided that, where the order of suspension is made by an authority empowered by
Government in this behalf which is lower than the appointing authority, such authority shall
forthwith report to the appointing authority the circumstances in which the order was made."
4. F jÃw £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀQÌAvÀ, G£ÀßvÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ (The Authority higher than the
Appointing Authority) zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ : CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
5. EwÛÃZÉUÉ MAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ C£À¢üPÀÈvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁzÀÝjAzÀ, E¯ÁSÁ
ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ CªÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¹, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ E£ÀÆß ¨ÁQ EzÁÝUÀ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è (CAzÀgÉ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è) D ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀåªÀºÀj¹, D £ËPÀgÀgÀ
UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁzÀ ¥ÀÆtð CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CªÀgÀ ºÀQÌ£À°ègÀÄªÀ gÀeÉ JAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ ºÁUÀÆ CªÀjUÉ
£ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ¤ÃqÀÄªÀAvÉ DzÉÃ²¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
6. CzÉÃ jÃw, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ, zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉAiÀÄ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°ènÖzÀÄÝ, £ÀAvÀgÀ, CªÀgÀÄ, D £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖ vÀAiÀiÁj¹
ªÀÄÄA¢£À PÀæªÀÄPÁÌV ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ, CªÀ£À CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À DzÉÃ±À gÀzÀÄÝ¥Àr¹, CªÀ£À
«gÀÄzÀÞ £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä GzÉÝÃ²¹zÀÝ ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸À¨ÁgÀzÉAzÀÄ wÃªÀiÁð¤¹, CªÀ£À£ÀÄß CzÉÃ ¸ÀÜ¼ÀzÀ°è
CzÉÃ ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ ¥ÀÄ£ÀB £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁrzÉ.
7. ¸ÀzÀj ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼Àr zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁgÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ (CAzÀgÉ,
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è) EzÀÝgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ, D ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼Àr D C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢zÀ,
PÉëÃvÀæ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÉÃ D C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¸À®Ä CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÉÆæÃvÁì»¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ, CAzÀgÉ,
CzÀ£ÀÄß CªÀgÀªÀgÀ «ªÉÃZÀ£ÉUÉ ©qÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¤AiÀÄvÀ PÀæªÀÄzÀAvÉ (as a routine) CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è (CAzÀgÉ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è) ªÀåªÀºÀj¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß DzÀµÀÄÖ
vÀqÉUÀlÖ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð: PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ½UÉ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 14 ¸ÉÃE« 99 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 15 £ÉÃ d£ÀªÀj 2001.
«µÀAiÀÄ: ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄAiÀÄ°è RÄ¯Á¸É ªÀiÁrzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è
CªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆa.
G¯ÉèÃR: ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå : ¹D¸ÀÄE 9 ¸ÉÃE« 95, ¢£ÁAPÀ 26Š6Š96.
1) Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄAiÀÄ°è zÀAqÀ£ÉUÉ UÀÄjAiÀiÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄ
dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¸À¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 26Š6Š96gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2) Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è zÉÆÃ¶AiÉÄAzÀÄ ¤zsÀðj¹, ¸ÀeÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸À¯ÁzÀ DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É
ªÀiÁvÀæ, M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ ªÀeÁ ªÀiÁrzÀ°è, G£ÀßvÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ CªÀ£À£ÀÄß zÉÆÃµÀ
ªÀÄÄPÀÛ£À£ÁßV ªÀiÁrzÀ°è, CªÀ£À£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ ªÀeÁ ªÀiÁrzÀ DzsÁgÀ G½AiÀÄÄªÀÅ¢®è ºÁUÀÆ F
PÁgÀtPÁÌV CªÀ£À£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ ¥ÀÅ£ÀB vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
3. F »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ wÃ¥Àð£ÀÄß ¸ÀÄªÀÄä£É
PÁAiÀÄzÉ, J¥sï.L.Dgï DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯ÉAiÉÄÃ zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹ ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß
PÉÊUÉÆ¼Àî§ºÀÄzÁVzÉ. ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÀÆqÀ®Ä CUÀvÀåªÁzÀ zÀÆgÀÄ, ¥ÀæxÀªÀÄ ªÀiÁ»w ªÀgÀ¢, ¸ÁQëUÀ¼À
ºÉÃ½PÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ E£ÁßªÀÅzÉÃ zÁR¯ÉUÀ½zÀÝ°è CªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¥ÉÇ°Ã¸ÀÄ C¢üPÁjUÀ½AzÀ ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ
²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß dgÀÄV¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
4. ªÉÄÃ°£ÀAvÉ ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä C£ÀÄPÀÆ®ªÁUÀÄªÀAvÉ, ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¥ÉÇ°Ã¸ÀÄ
oÁuÉAiÀÄ°è AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ºÀÆqÀ®àmÁÖUÀ, E®èªÉÃ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï
zÀÆgÀ£ÀÄß zÁR°¹PÉÆAqÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è, zÀÆj£À ¥Àæw, J¥sï.L.Dgï, ¸ÁQëUÀ¼À ºÉÃ½PÉ, ¸ÁQëUÀ¼À ¥ÀnÖ,
ZÁeïð²Ãmï EvÁå¢UÀ¼À zÀørüÃPÀøvÀ ¥ÀæwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹ PÉÆqÀ®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ
¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, UÀøºÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÁjUÉ E¯ÁSÉgÀªÀgÀÄ, qÉÊgÉPÀÖgï d£ÀgÀ¯ï ºÁUÀÆ E£ïì¥ÉPÀÖgï
d£ÀgÀ¯ï D¥sï ¥ÉÇ°Ã¸ï, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ gÀªÀjUÉ F §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤ÃqÀ®Ä PÉÆÃjzÉ.
¦. Dgï. 138
vÉgÉ¸Á ¨sÀmÁÖZÁAiÀÄð
¹.D.¸ÀÄ.E.
C¢üPÀøvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À
¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE:1:¸ÉÃE«:2001, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 7£ÉÃ ¥sÉ§æªÀj 2001
«µÀAiÀÄ: ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ PÁAiÀÄðPÁÌV ¤AiÉÆÃf¸À®àlÖ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¨sÁgÀvÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ
DAiÉÆÃUÀªÀÅ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ ²¹Û£À C¢üPÁgÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ §UÉÎ.
NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ: ¨sÁgÀvÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¹§âA¢, ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ zÀÆgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¦AZÀtÂ (¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ vÀgÀ¨ÉÃw
E¯ÁSÉ) dAn PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð (E) gÀªÀgÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 8Š11Š2000zÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå:
11012:7:98ŠFJ¸ïnn (J).
¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:Š
¨sÁgÀvÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀªÀÅ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ ««zsÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ
¥ÀæQæAiÉÄUÁV ¤AiÉÆÃf¸À¯ÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F jÃw ¤AiÉÆÃf¸À®àlÖ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ
C¢üPÁgÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°ègÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
2. »ÃUÉ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ PÀvÀðªÀåPÁÌV ¤AiÉÆÃf¸À®àlÖ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¨sÁgÀvÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ
DAiÉÆÃUÀªÀÅ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ ²¹Û£À C¢üPÁgÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ §UÉÎ ¨sÁgÀvÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¹§âA¢, ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ zÀÆgÀÄ,
¦AZÀtÂ (¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ vÀgÀ¨ÉÃw E¯ÁSÉ) ªÀÄAvÁæ®AiÀÄªÀÅ ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀÄªÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃRzÀ°è
£ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ ¥ÀvÀæªÀ£ÀÄß EzÀgÉÆA¢UÉ ®UÀwÛ¹zÉ. CzÀÄ ¸ÀéAiÀÄAªÉÃzÀåªÁVzÉ.
3. ¨sÁgÀvÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ J®ègÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀ®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J®è
¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð: ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð:E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜjUÉ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀÄ¸ÁgÀ
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
¦.Dgï.223 PÉ.J¯ï. dAiÀÄgÁªÀiï

No. 11012/98-Estt. (A)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, dated the 7th November 2000
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject: Disciplinary jurisdiction of Election Commission of India over
Government servants deputed for election duties.
The undersigned is directed to say that one of the issues in Writ Petition (C)
No.606/1993 in the matter of Election Commission of India Vs. Union of India & Other
was regarding jurisdiction of Election Commission of India over the Government servants
deputed for election duties under section 28A of the Representation of the People Act,
1951 and section 13CC of the Representation of the People Act, 1950. The Supreme Court
by its order dated 21.9.2000 disposed of the said petition in terms of the settlement
between the Union of India and Election Commission of India. The said Terms of
Settlement are as under:-
"The disciplinary functions of the Election Commission over officers, staff and
police deputed to perform election duties shall extend to-
a) Suspending any officer/official/police personnel for insubordination or
dereliction of duty;
b) Substituting any officer/official/police personnel by another such person, and
returning the substituted individual to the cadre to which he belongs, with
appropriate report on his conduct;
c) making recommendation to the competent authority, for taking disciplinary
action, for any act of insubordination or dereliction of duty, while on election
duty. Such recommendation shall be promptly acted upon by the disciplinary
authority, and action taken will be communicated to the Election
Commission; within a period of 6 months from the date of the Election
Commission's recommendation.
d) the Governement of India will advise the State Governments that they too
should follow the above principles and decisions, since a large number of
election officials are under their administrative control."
2. The implication of the disposal of the Writ Petition by the Supreme Court in terms
of the above settlement is that the Election Commission can suspend any
officer/official/police personnel working under the Central Government or Public Sector
Undertaking or an autonomous body fully or substantially financed by the Government for
insubordination or dereliction of duty and the Election Commission can also direct
substituting any officer/official/police personnel by another person besides making
recommendations to the Competent Authority for taking disciplinary action for
insubordination or dereliction of duty while engaged in the preparation of electoral rolls or
election duty. It is also clarified that it is not necessary to amend the service rules for
exercise of powers of suspension by the Election Commission in this case since these
powers are derived from the provisions of section 13CC of the Representation of the
People Act, 1950 and section 28A of The Representation of the People Act, 1951 since
provisions of these Acts would have overriding effect over the disciplinary rules.
However, in case there are any conflicting provisions in an Act governing the disciplinary
action, the same are required to be amended suitably in accordance with the Terms of
Settlement.
3. All Ministries/Departments are requested to bring the above Terms of Settlement
to the notice of all concerned for information and compliance.
Smt. S. Bandopadhyay
Director
No. 11012/7/98-Estt. (A)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, dated the 8th November 2000
To
The Chief Secretaries of all the State Government/UT Administrations
Subject: Disciplinary jurisdiction of Election Commission of India over Government

servants deputed for election duties.
Sir,
I am directed to say that one of the issues in Writ Petition (C) No.606/1993 in the matter
of Election Commission of India Vs. Union of India & Others was regarding jurisdiction of
Election Commission of India over the Government sevants deputed for election duties under
section 28A of the representation of the People Act, 1951 and section 13CC of the representation
of the People Act, 1950. The Supreme Court by its order dated 21.9.2000 disposed of the said
petition in terms of the Terms of the Settlement agreed between the Union of India and Election
Commission of India. The said Terms of Settlement are as under:-
"The disciplinary functions of the Election Commission over officers, staff and police
deputed to perform election duties shall extend to-
a) Suspending any officer/official/police personnel for insubordination or dereliction of
duty;
b) Substituting any officer/official/police personnel by another such person, and
returning the substituted individual to the cadre to which he belongs, with
appropriate report on his conduct;
c) making recommendation to the competent authority, for taking disciplinary action,
for any act of insubordination or dereliction of duty, while on election duty. Such
recommendation shall be promptly acted upon by the disciplinary authority, and
action taken will be communicated to the Election Commission; within a period of 6
months from the date of the Election Commission's recommendation.
d) The Government of India will advise the State Governments that they too should
follow the above principles and decisions, since a large number of election officials
are under their administrative control."
2. Government of India has issued instruction to bring the above terms of settlement to the
notice of all concerned for information and compliance vide OM NO.11012/7/98-Estt. (A) dated
7th November, 2000 (Copy enclosed). It is requested that the State Government may follow the
Terms of Settlement above mentioned in the case of officials deputed for election duties by the
State Government.
Your faithfully,
HARINDER SINGH
Joint Secretary (E)
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä ªÀÄAdÆgÁw
¤ÃqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR: C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 2 ¸ÉÃE« 98, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 16.7.98.
¨sÀæµÁÖZÁgÀ ¤gÉÆÃzsÀ C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄ, 1988gÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 19 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ zÀAqÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÀiÁ ¸ÀA»vÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt
197 gÀrAiÀÄ°è PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä C¢üPÁgÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ
ºÀÆqÀÄªÀÅzÀPÉÌ C£ÀÄªÀÄw ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß vÀ£Àß ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À¯ÁzÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ
£ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ºÀÆqÀ®Ä ªÉÄÃ¯ÉÆßÃlPÉÌ ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ DzsÁgÀUÀ½ªÉAiÉÄÃ JAzÀÄ ¥Àj²Ã°¹, CAvÀºÀ
C£ÀÄªÀÄw ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ wÃªÀiÁð¤¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ, ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è w½¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹zÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ºÀÆqÀ®Ä
¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ C£ÀÄªÀÄw PÉÆÃgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è vÀ¤SÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ, zÀ¸ÁÛªÉÃdÄUÀ¼À
¥ÀæwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄwÛ®èªÉA§ÄzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÉ.
3. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ, ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï «¨sÁUÀ, ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ºÁUÀÆ ¹Nr, EvÁå¢UÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ
«gÀÄzÀÞ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ºÀÆqÀ®Ä ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£É PÉÆÃgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è
vÀ¤SÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ, zÀ¸ÁÛªÉÃdÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ
ªÀÄvÉÆÛªÉÄä ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
4. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÁjUÉ E¯ÁSÉ, EªÀgÀÄ ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
CªÀgÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ E¯ÁSÉ: ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ½UÉ ¥Á®£ÉUÁV w½¸À®Ä PÉÆÃjzÉ.
5. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð : PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉÃ½zÀAvÉ
zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ, ªÉÄÃ°£À PÀArPÉ-1 gÀ°è ºÉÃ½zÀAvÉ PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è, £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è ºÁUÀÆ
CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVgÀÄªÀ PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ
¥ÀjµÀÌgÀuÉ PÀÄjvÀÄ.
G¯ÉèÃR: C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 14 ¸ÉÃE« 96, ¢£ÁAPÀ; 31.5.1997.
1. ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ°£À D¥Á¢vÀ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ, ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß
DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è, £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è ºÁUÀÆ CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è GAmÁUÀ§ºÀÄzÁzÀ «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß
vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 31.5.1997gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 14 ¸ÉÃE« 96 gÀ°è
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. ¸ÀzÀj C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ PÀArPÉ 7 gÀ°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄV¸À®Ä
PÁ®«ÄwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ. CzÀgÀ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¨sÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ GzÀÞj¹zÉ.
``²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄzÀ ºÀAvÀ UÀjµÀ× PÁ®«Äw
(J) ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ CPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ : zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ 6 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §AzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ, zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
vÀAiÀiÁj¸ÀÄªÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä CxÀªÁ
¥ÁægÀA©üPÀ vÀ¤SÉ : «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ
zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹, eÁjUÉÆ½¸À®Ä;
(©) zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖUÉ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «ªÀgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß 2 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä ºÁUÀÆ «ZÁgÀuÁ C¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ
ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÉÃ«Ä¸À®Ä;
(¹) «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß 6 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä;
(r) «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ CzÀ£ÀÄß 2 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
¹éÃPÀj¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¤tð¬Ä¸À®Ä;
(E) PÁgÀt PÉÃ¼ÀÄªÀ 2£ÉÃ ¸ÀÆZÀ£Á ¥ÀvÀæªÀ£ÀÄß, «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ 2 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
eÉÆvÉUÉ, D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ ¤ÃqÀ®Ä;
(J¥sï) CAwªÀÄ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À®Ä; 3 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
2. ²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À°è ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀzÀÞwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉ®
¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ »AzÉ eÁjUÉÆ½¹zÀ »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸À®Ä, £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ
ªÀÄÄV¸À®Ä ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹zÀ PÁ®«ÄwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¸ÀªÀÄUÀæªÁV ªÀÄgÀÄ ¥Àj²Ã°¹,
¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ PÁ®«ÄwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀÆPÀÛªÉAzÀÄ ¨sÁ«¹zÉ. CzÀgÀAvÉ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 31.5.1997gÀ
C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ PÀArPÉ 7£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ ¥Àæw¸ÁÜ¦¸À¯ÁVzÉ (substituted):-
``²¹Û£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À°è DUÀÄªÀ «¼ÀA§PÉÌ ªÀÄÄRåªÁV F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ PÁgÀtUÀ¼ÉAzÀÄ
PÀAqÀÄ§A¢zÉ:
(C) zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¸ÀÄªÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä CxÀªÁ
¥ÁægÀA©üPÀ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ «¼ÀA§, («ZÁgÀuÁ
C¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÆß ¸ÀºÀ E°è ¸ÉÃj¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ);
(D) «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀéjvÀªÁV ªÀiÁqÀzÉÃ, «ZÁgÀuÁ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ «¼ÀA§; ºÁUÀÆ
(E) D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ GzÉÝÃ±À ¥ÀÆªÀðPÀªÁV «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ°è ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ «¼ÀA§.
²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ DgÀA©ü¹, ªÀÄÄV¸À®Ä, ««zsÀ ºÀAvÀUÀ½UÁV F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ UÀjµÀ× PÁ®«ÄwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ. ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ F PÁ¯ÁªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.''
(C) ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ CPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ : zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ 1 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹, eÁjUÉÆ½¸À®Ä;
(D) zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖUÉ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «ªÀgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß 1 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
(E) «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß 4 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä;
(F) «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ CzÀ£ÀÄß 1 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
¹éÃPÀj¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¤tð¬Ä¸À®Ä;
(G) PÁgÀt PÉÃ¼ÀÄªÀ 2£ÉÃ ¸ÀÆZÀ£Á ¥ÀvÀæªÀ£ÀÄß, «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ 1 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
eÉÆvÉUÉ, D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ ¤ÃqÀ®Ä;
(H) CAwªÀÄ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À®Ä; 1 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
3. G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 31.5.1997gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ PÀArPÉ 8gÀ ªÉÆzÀ®£ÉAiÀÄ ªÁPÀåzÀ°è ``21
wAUÀ¼À'' J£ÀÄßªÀ ¥ÀzÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ``9 wAUÀ¼À'' J£ÀÄßªÀ ¥ÀzÀUÀ½AzÀ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¥Àæw¸ÁÜ¦¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
4. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ F
¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ZÁZÀÆ vÀ¥ÀàzÉ PÀqÁØAiÀÄªÁV ¥Á°¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EzÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ ¥Á®£ÉUÁV vÀgÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èAX¸ÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ vÁªÉÃ
PÀvÀðªÀå ¯ÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄPÉÌ M¼À¥ÀqÀ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉAiÉÄAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ w½¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
5. ¢£ÁAPÀ: 31.5.97 gÀ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è, ªÉÄÃ°£À PÀArPÉ 3 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 4 gÀ°è
£ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹zÀ §zÀ¯ÁªÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¹, E£ÁßªÀÅzÉÃ §zÀ¯ÁªÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ªÀiÁrgÀÄªÀÅ¢®è
JAzÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ w½¹zÉ.
f. gÁdÄ ¥ÉæÃªÀiï PÀÄªÀiÁgï
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¢ÃWÀðPÁ®¢AzÀ C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ UÉÊgÀÄºÁdjAiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°è
ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR: PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸ÉÃªÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ; 1.6.2001gÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå:
¦J¸ï¹:55:¹J£ïJ¸ï:2000.
ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ²PÀët E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÉÇAzÀgÀ°è D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ
¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ ¢ÃWÀðPÁ® C£À¢üPÀÈvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀªÀÇ ¸ÀºÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ CªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ
¸ÀPÁ®zÀ°è ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß dgÀÄV¸ÀzÉ, PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀgÀ°è UÀªÀÄ£ÁºÀð «¼ÀA§ ªÀiÁrzÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ,
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸ÉÃªÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀªÀÅ ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ vÀ£Àß ¢£ÁAPÀ: 1.6.2001 gÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è F PÉ¼ÀUÉ
GzÀÞj¹zÀAvÉ CªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¹zÉ:-
``¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ²PÀët E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 12.3.2001gÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå: DPÀÄPÀ 194 JAJA¹
88gÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÉÇAzÀgÀ°è DgÉÆÃ¦vÀgÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 10.10.87 jAzÀ C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ UÉÊgÀÄºÁdjAiÀÄ°èzÀÝ §UÉÎ
ªÀiÁað 2000 zÀ°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ ¥ÀÆgÉÊ¹ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 8(viii) gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ ªÀeÁ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ zÀAqÀ£É
«¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ ¸ÀºÀªÀÄw PÉÆÃjvÀÄÛ.
¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è D¥Á¢vÀgÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ C£À¢üPÀÈvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdgÁzÀ ¢ÃWÀðPÁ®zÀ
£ÀAvÀgÀªÀÇ ¸ÀºÀ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ CªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÁægÀA©ü¸ÀzÉÃ
EgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ, ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è, £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ°è ºÁUÀÆ CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß
vÀqÉUÀlÄÖªÀ PÀÄjvÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ PÁ®PÁ®PÉÌ ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀUÀ¼À°è£À ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ½UÉ «gÀÄzÀÞªÁzÀ
PÀæªÀÄªÁVzÉ.
²¸ÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è D¥Á¢vÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¢ÃWÀðPÁ®zÀ C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ UÉÊgÀÄºÁdj DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ½zÀÄÝ,
C£ÀAvÀgÀªÀÇ CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀzÀÞwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÁzÀgÀÆ vÀqÉAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀÄ
¸ÀªÀÄAd¸ÀªÉAzÀÄ DAiÉÆÃUÀªÀÅ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ¥ÀnÖzÉ.
F »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è F §UÉÎ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè E¯ÁSÁ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ : ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜjUÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ
¤zÉÃð±À£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ «£ÀAw¸À®Ä ¤zÉÃð²vÀ£ÁVzÉÝÃ£É.''
2. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ : PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸ÉÃªÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ,
ªÉÄÃ¯É GzÀÞj¹zÀ CªÀ¯ÉÆÃPÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ£ÀzÀ°èlÄÖPÉÆAqÀÄ, ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁUÀÄªÀ
£ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957
ºÁUÀÆ ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ (¸ÉÃªÁ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ) DVAzÁUÉÎ ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀéAiÀÄ «¼ÀA§ ªÀiÁqÀzÉ ¸ÀPÁ®zÀ°è ¸ÀÆPÀÛ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ J®è ²¸ÀÄÛ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ªÀÄvÉÆÛªÉÄä ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä ªÀÄAdÆgÁw
¤ÃqÀ®Ä C¢üPÁgÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄAdÆgÁw DzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÀÄ¥ÀðPÀªÁV
ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄwÛ®èªÉA§ §UÉÎ - ªÀÄgÀÄ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
G¯ÉèÃR: (1) ¢£ÁAPÀ: 16.7.98gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 2 ¸ÉÃE« 98.
(2) ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.3.2001gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 3 ¸ÉÃE« 2001.
1. ¨sÀæµÁÖZÁgÀ ¤gÉÆÃzsÀ C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄ, 1988gÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 19 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ zÀAqÀ¥ÀæQæAiÀiÁ ¸ÀA»vÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt
197gÀ CrAiÀÄ°è PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä C¢üPÁgÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ
ºÀÆqÀÄªÀÅzÀPÉÌ C£ÀÄªÀÄw ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß vÀ£Àß ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À¯ÁzÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ,
£ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ºÀÆqÀ®Ä ªÉÄÃ¯ÉÆßÃlPÉÌ ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ DzsÁgÀUÀ½ªÉAiÉÄÃ JAzÀÄ ¥Àj²Ã°¹, CAvÀºÀ
C£ÀÄªÀÄw ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ wÃªÀiÁð¤¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 16.7.1998 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.3.2001gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ
eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ GZÀÑ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï C¦Ã®Ä ¸ÀASÉå: 421:1996-¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï E£ïì¥ÉPÀÖgï,
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ «gÀÄzÀÞ JA. £ÀAdÄAqÀ - F ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¢£ÁAPÀ: 14.9.2000 zÀAzÀÄ ¤ÃrzÀ
wÃ¦ð£À ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß EzÀgÉÆA¢UÉ ®UÀwÛ¹zÉ. ¸ÀzÀj wÃ¥ÀÄð ¸ÀéAiÀÄA ªÉÃzÀåªÁVzÉ.
3. ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ D¸ÀàzÀUÀ¼À CrAiÀÄ°è £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è C©üAiÉÆÃUÀUÉÆ½¸À®Ä C£ÀÄªÀÄw ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ
DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÉÄÃ°£À PÀArPÉ (1) gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Á°¹ PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CAvÀºÀ DzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß zÉÆÃµÀ¥ÀÆjvÀªÁV
ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß vÀ¦à¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
4. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ : PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ : E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ¸ÀzÀj
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ CzÀ£ÀÄß CªÀgÀªÀgÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ J¯Áè ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2000
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.F. SALDANHA
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 421/1996
BETWEEN:
State by Police Inspector,

Karnataka Lokayukta,
Bangalore Division,
Bangalore.
APPELLANT
(By Sri N.V. Prakash, Addl. SPP)
AND:
M. Nanjunda,
S/o. Maraiah,
Village Accountant and
Village Panchayath Secretary,
Bettadalasur, Bangalore North Taluk,
Bangalore Rural District.. RESPONDENT
(By Sri Devaraj, Senior Counsel for C.G. Sundar, Advocate)
This Criminal Appeal is filed u/s 378(1) and (3) Cr.P.C. to grant leave to file an
appeal against the judgement dated 11-1-1996 passed by the Spl. Judge, Bangalore in S.C.
No. 185/94 acquitting the respondent accused for an offence u/s 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w Section
13(2) of P.C. Act, 1988.
This Criminal Appeal coming on for Hearing this day the court delivered the
following:-
JUDGMENT
The State of Karnataka has assailed the order of acquittal recorded in favour of the
respondent-accused in Special Case No. 185/1994 disposed of by the learned Special
Judge, Bangalore on 11-1-1996. The accused was prosecuted on a corruption charge and
the prosecution lead substantial evidence for purposes of factually establishing that the
accused who was the Village Accountant and hence a public servant had demanded and
received a sum of Rs. 500/- as and by way of illegal gratification from the complainant
Puttanna. The Principal ground on which the trial court acquitted the accused was
because, the finding was recorded that the sanction order Ex.P-7 was invalid. The court
held that PW-9 the Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Urban had not duly applied his mind
while according sanction and that consequently, the sanction order was liable to be struck
down. In view of the fact that the sanction order was held to be bad, the court recorded an
order of acquittal in favour of the accused and the present appeal is directed against that
order.
2. The Principal submission canvassed by the learned Addl. SPP was that if the
court were to peruse the rest of the evidence de hors the sanction order, that there is really
no ground on which this material can be rejected by the court, and that this evidence in
terms establishes that the accused who was a public servant had infact received the illegal
gratification of Rs. 500/- from the complainant on 19-10-1992 for purposes of showing
favour to him in the matter of sanction of plans for the construction of building on the plot
belonging to the complainant's wife. The submission is that if this is the position, merely
because of some technical infirmity, that it would be a travesty of justice for the accused to
get the benefit of an order of acquittal particularly since corruption is an offence that
seriously affects public life and that consequently, the order of acquittal should be
reversed. Coming to the validity of the sanction order, the learned Addl. SPP submitted
that a perusal of the order will indicate that in Paragraph 2, the sanctioning authority has in
terms stated that he has perused and considered the record of the case and the facts of the
case and that being satisfied that this is a fit case for the accord of sanction to a corruption
charge, that the sanction had been accorded. It is his submission that the trial court was in
error in having held that there was non-application of mind in this case when infact, the
sanction order mentioned that the authority has perused the records and considered them.
Next, the learned Counsel has drawn my attention to the evidence of the Deputy
Commissioner who is PW-9 wherein he has stated in the witness box that he did receive
the records of the case, that he had considered the records and accorded sanction on that
basis. His submission is that in this background, there was due application of mind and
that the sanction order is valid.
3. This position is seriously disputed by the respondent's learned Counsel who
defends the order passed by the trial court principally on the ground that there are well
defined principles of law that apply to the test as to whether or not, a sanction order is
valid and it is his contention, that if from a perusal of the sanction order, the court cannot
be satisfied that there has been due application of mind, that merely through a process of
covering-up when the witness enters the witness box that it would not be sufficient, to
satisfy the important ingredient of due application of mind.
4. The law with regard to the manner in which the sanction is to be accorded and
more importantly, the quality of a sanction order is very well defined. I need to reiterate
here that corruption cases involve public servants and, regardless of the facts of each
individual case, merely because there is some allegation of a corruption charge, or merely
because the anti corruption police put up the papers for sanction on the ground that the
corruption offence has been committed, does not ipso facto mean that the authority must
mechanically accord sanction. There is very deep-seated and well defined philosophy
behind the requirement for sanction in corruption cases, the first of them being that the
consequences of accord of sanction are very disastrous to the public servant both as far as
his job, his reputation and even his social standing are concerned. It is therefore very
important that the sanctioning authority must independently peruse the investigation
papers and independently of the police report come to the conclusion that there is enough
material to sustain the charge. If there are infirmities in the investigation, if the evidence
gathered is weak, or if on an overall view of the material produced by the investigating
agency there is really no valid case made out or no case that could ever sustain a
conviction, then merely because the authority has asked for sanction, it would not be
correct for sanction to be accorded. There is another aspect of the law which this court has
laid down recently viz., that there are a class of misconducts which could be adequately
dealt with through disciplinary or departmental proceedings and it is this class of small
cases wherein it would be inappropriate to grant sanction if adequate punishment could be
awarded through disciplinary or departmental proceedings. Whether the case is one which
therefore validly justifies a prosecution insofar as it is serious enough to warrant the heavy
punishments prescribed under the Prevention of Corruption Act or whether it is one which
can be adequately punished through disciplinary proceedings is an aspect which the
sanctioning authority is required to judicially consider before granting sanction. This
being the legal position, the courts have invariably held that sanction orders which are
mechanically or arbitrarily granted are liable to be struck down.
5. A mere perusal of the sanction order in the present case is sufficient to indicate
that it was obviously prepared by the office staff of the Deputy Commissioner and it is
equally clear to me that the officer has signed it without even reading it. The reason for
this is because though an attempt has been made to see to it that it is in the correct
proforma, there is a tell-tale indication in Paragraph 1, wherein certain words appear in
brackets. The whole of Paragraph 1 is reproduced below:-
"Whereas it is alleged that Shri M. Nanjunda while functioning as VILLAGE
ACCOUNTANT CUM V.P. SECRETARY, BETTAHALSUR V.P. JALA
HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK on 19th day of October, 1992
(particulars of the acts constituting offences committed by the accused to be given
in detail)."
6. It is a sad reflection on the manner in which, the sanctioning Authority has
functioned and it is equally unfortunate that on officer holding a responsible post has
behaved in this fashion. I fully share the sentiments expressed by the learned Addl. SPP.
when he pointed out that the record of this case on facts clearly makes out a perfect case
for conviction and that only because of the absolutely defective and worthless sanction
order, that the accused has technically got the benefit of an acquittal. The presence of
those words in brackets and the fact that the officer has not even read the sanction order
before signing it, is sufficient to support the findings of the learned trial judge that this is a
case of total non-application of mind. It is true that the learned Addl. SPP vehemently
tried to save the sanction order by pointing out to me that in his evidence before the court,
the Deputy Commissioner has tried to state that he had received the records and that he
had examined and studied them before according sanction but, this worsens the position
because of what I have already recorded earlier. It clearly shows that the officer was
conscious of his earlier errors and tried to cover-up for them in the witness box. It is also
well settled law that an order is required to be self-sustaining and is required to be able to
stand on its own feet, and that no amount of subsequent padding from the maker of the
order or cover-up action in the witness box could bolster up or revive or revitalise a
sanction order that is virtually non-est. This is a case in which the sanction order itself on
the face of it will have to be rejected by the court and no amount of effort by the Deputy
Commissioner in the witness box can rejuvenate it.
7. It is well settled law that in corruption trials a valid sanction order is condition
precedent for a conviction. I do not need to cite the case law on this point, as the law is
well settled. Where the sanction order is defective, the prosecution is vitiated and the
learned trial Judge has rightly applied the law in this case. It is impossible and it would be
improper for this court to interfere with the order of acquittal in the aforesaid
circumstances.
8. "One needs to address a candid and straight question to the authorities of the
State Govt., who are incharge of these prosecutions asking them as to whether they are at
all serious about curtailing and containing corruption or whether the line of action is so
directed towards encouraging this activity. As matters stand, the prosecutions themselves
are confined to the small fry leading to the impression that the Prevention of Corruption
Act does not apply at higher levels! What worsens the situation is that the investigations
are conducted in such a cavalier manner as to provide the accused with the necessary
escape routes thereby generating the confidence in every corrupt official that there is no
risk of ever getting convicted. To add to this disastrous situation wherein not even 9
percent of the prosecutions and in convictions comes the added facility of the sanction
orders being defective in atleast 90 percent of the cases. The requirements are very simple
and the format of a valid sanction are well known despite which in case after case, the
court comes across highly placed Govt. officers who are the sanctioning authorities
virtually abdicating their responsibilities and signing sanction orders that have obviously
been drafted out by the clerks - judging from the quality thereof. It is hoped that the State
Government will view this situation with sufficient seriousness and ensure that these
officers behave and function with a sence of responsibility in future. Even in those of the
cases where the prosecution would have succeeded in punishing the corrupt official, the
defective sanction order guarantees their acquittal. The investigating officers are the ones
who are to blame because it is obvious to the court that they do not even bother to read or
scrutinise the sanction order and to get it rectified wherever it is defective.
9. The Prevention of Corruption Act which was put on the statute book with the
sole purpose of bringing to book corrupt persons in public life is being frustrated and
nothing can be more damaging to public interest than a situation in which a corrupt public
servant who has been prosecuted by the anti-corruption authorities gets acquitted by
default, is required to be paid the salary and allowances for the entire period and is again
let loose on society with renewed vigour and appetite. The investigations in these cases
reveal that the officials who got trapped are not novices or new comers, that they are
regular seasoned campaigners who have reached a point of avarice, that the victims cannot
bear to contend with and that is the stage at which alone they take the trouble to come to
the anti-corruption authorities. No investigation is done with regard to their assets and
whether they are disproportionate to their known source of earning. When such an official
is trapped and gets away, it is surest precursor of unlimited corruption on accelerated basis
thereafter. This court seriously recommends to the State Government, that it wakes up to
this situation and eliminates these avenues that are only compounding corruption at all
levels of public life. It needs to be pointed out that if a regular example is made by
awarding condign punishments in a few cases that it will have a chilling effect to this
activity which is the biggest blemish on public life in this country."
10. The appeal accordingly fails and stands dismissed. The bail bond of the
accused if executed to stand cancelled. (Registrar General to forward a copy of this
judgement to the Lokayukta and the Home Secretary, Government of Karnataka.)
Sd/-
JUDGE
COPY
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar,
High Court of Karnataka,
Bangalore-560 001.

¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 18 ¸ÉÃE« 2001, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 14£ÉÃ ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 2001
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸Á©ÃvÁzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ½UÉ C£ÀÄUÀÄtªÁV «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÁzÀ
zÀAqÀ£ÉUÀ¼À PÀÄjvÀÄ.
1. ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÁUÀ J¸ÀUÀÄªÀ C¥ÀgÁzsÀUÀ¼À PÀÄjvÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¹, ¸Á©ÃvÁzÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è DgÉÆÃ¦ £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÁzÀAvÀºÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉUÀ¼À §UÉÎ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ
(ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 8gÀ°è ¤¢ðµÀÖ¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
DzÀgÉ, ¸ÀzÀj ¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ°è AiÀiÁªÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀPÉÌ AiÀiÁªÀ ²PÉëAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß
¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀÅ¢®è. EzÀjAzÁV PÉ®ªÀÅ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è DgÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ wÃªÀævÉVAvÀ «¢ü¸À¯ÁzÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
PÀrªÉÄ CxÀªÁ ºÉaÑ£ÀzÁUÀÄªÀ ¸ÁzsÀåvÉ EzÉ. C®èzÉ, ««zsÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, ºÉÆÃ°¸À§ºÀÄzÁzÀAvÀºÀ
wÃªÀævÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢zÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¨ÉÃgÉ ¨ÉÃgÉ zÀAqÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ ¸ÁzsÀåvÉAiÀÄÆ
EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ EzÀ£ÀÄß PÀÆ®APÀÄµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹ ¸Á©ÃvÁzÀAvÀºÀ
DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ½UÀ£ÀÄUÀÄtªÁV «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÁzÀAvÀºÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉUÀ¼À GzÁºÀgÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹zÉ:Š
PÀæªÀÄ¸ÀASÉå ¸Á©ÃvÁzÀAvÀºÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ ¸ÀégÀÆ¥À «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÁzÀAvÀºÀ zÀAqÀ£É
1. MAzÀÄ wAUÀ½UÉ ªÉÄÃ®àlÄÖ, DzÀgÉ, £Á®ÄÌ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀqÉ
wAUÀ½VAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ C£À¢üPÀøvÀ »rAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdj.
2. £Á®ÄÌ wAUÀ¼ÀÄ «ÄÃjzÀ C£À¢üPÀøvÀ UÉÊgÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ vÉUÉzÀÄ ºÁPÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
ºÁdj.
3. gÀÆ. 10,000 QÌAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ ªÉÆvÀÛzÀ 5 ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀqÉ
vÁvÁÌ°PÀ ºÀt zÀÄgÀÄ¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀ »rAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
4. gÀÆ. 10,000 QÌAvÀ C¢üPÀ ªÉÆvÀÛzÀ PÁ®ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂAiÀÄ ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ PÉ¼ÀV£À
vÁvÁÌ°PÀ ºÀt zÀÄgÀÄ¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀ ºÀAvÀPÉÌ E½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
5. ¸ÀPÁðj ºÀtzÀ zÀÄgÀÄ¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀ: vÀ¥ÀÅà §¼ÀPÉ ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ PÀqÁØAiÀÄ ¤ªÀøwÛ
6. PÁAiÀÄð«zsÁ£ÀzÀ ¯ÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÉÆzÀ® ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è ªÁUÀÝAqÀ£É ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
JgÀqÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ £ÀAvÀgÀzÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è
PÁ®ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂAiÀÄ°è PÉ¼ÀV£À ºÀAvÀPÉÌ
E½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
7. PÀbÉÃj PÁAiÀÄð«zsÁ£À PÉÊ¦r EvÁå¢AiÀÄ°è ªÉÆzÀ® ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è ªÁUÀÝAqÀ£É, JgÀqÀÄ
¤¢ðµÀÖ¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ £ÀAvÀgÀzÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è PÀ¤µÀÖ ¥ÀPÀë
¸ÀPÁgÀtzÀ®èzÀ (ÇÀªÀÄAd¸À) «¼ÀA§ MAzÀÄ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀqÉ
»rAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
8. ¯ÉÊAVPÀ QgÀÄPÀÄ¼À PÉ¼ÀªÀÄlÖzÀ PÁ®ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂ CxÀªÁ
ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ E½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
9. ªÉÄÃ¯Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼À °TvÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß JgÀqÀÄ ªÁ¶ðPÀ §rÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀqÉ
¥Á°¸À®Ä ¤gÁPÀgÀuÉ. »rAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
¥Á°¸À®Ä ¤gÁPÀgÀuÉ. »rAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
10. PÀÄlÄA§zÀ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÉÆ§âjUÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ PÁ®ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂAiÀÄ°è£À PÉ¼ÀV£À ºÀAvÀPÉÌ
PÀA¥À¤ CxÀªÁ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜAiÀÄ°è E½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
GzÉÆåÃUÀUÀ½¹PÉÆ¼Àî®Ä C¢üPÁgÀ ¸ÁÜ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß
G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ CxÀªÁ
ªÀZÀð¸Àì£ÀÄß ©ÃgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
11. C¢üPÀøvÀ PÀvÀðªÀåUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ PÀqÁØAiÀÄ ¤ªÀøwÛ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À ¸Àé»vÁ¸ÀQÛ M¼ÀUÉÆAqÀ
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ PÀA¥À¤ CxÀªÁ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÉ CxÀªÁ
M§â ªÀåQÛUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ
ªÀåªÀºÀj¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ CxÀªÁ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ
UÀÄwÛUÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉÆqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ CxÀªÁ
ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
12. PÉ.¹.J¸ï. (£ÀqÀvÉ) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1966 ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ PÀqÁØAiÀÄ ¤ªÀøwÛ
gÀ°è£À CªÀPÁ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èAX¹
gÁdQÃAiÀÄ CxÀªÁ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉUÀ¼À°è
¨sÁUÀªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
13. PÉ.¹.J¸ï. (£ÀqÀvÉ) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1966gÀ PÁ®ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂAiÀÄ°è£À PÉ¼ÀV£À ºÀAvÀPÉÌ
CªÀPÁ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èAX¹ ªÀÄÄµÀÌgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
¥ÀæzÀ±Àð£ÀUÀ¼À°è ¨sÁUÀªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
14. PÉ.¹.J¸ï. (£ÀqÀvÉ) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1966gÀ PÀ¤µÀÖ ¥ÀPÀë JgÀqÀÄ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À
CªÀPÁ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èA¦ü¹ DPÁ±ÀªÁtÂ, §rÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀqÉ »rAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
¥ÀwæPÉ, zÀÆgÀzÀ±Àð£À ªÉÆzÀ¯ÁzÀ §øºÀvï
ªÀiÁzsÀåªÀÄUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀQæAiÀÄªÁV ¥Á¯ÉÆÎ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ.
15. PÉ.¹.J¸ï. (£ÀqÀvÉ) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1966gÀ PÀ¤µÀÖ ¥ÀPÀë JgÀqÀÄ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À
CªÀPÁ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èAX¹ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀ£ÀÄß §rÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀqÉ »rAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
nÃQ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
16. PÉ.¹.J¸ï. (£ÀqÀvÉ) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1966gÀ PÁ®ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂAiÀÄ PÉ¼ÀV£À ºÀAvÀPÉÌ
CªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß G®èAX¹ ªÀAwUÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß E½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
¹éÃPÀj¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ CxÀªÁ ¨ÉÃgÉ jÃwAiÀÄ°è ¤¢ü
¸ÀAUÀæ»¸À®Ä, ¤¢ü ¸ÀAUÀæºÀuÉ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ°è
¥Á¯ÉÎÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ, CxÀªÁ EvÀgÉ
¸ÀAUÀæºÀuÉUÀ¼ÀÄ £ÀUÀzÀÄ CxÀªÁ EvÀgÉ gÀÆ¥À
17. ªÀgÀzÀQëuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉÆqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ: ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ vÉUÉzÀÄ ºÁPÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ CxÀªÁ
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀPÉÌ: PÉÆqÀÄªÀÅzÀPÉÌ
GvÉÛÃf¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
18. PÉ.¹.J¸ï. (£ÀqÀvÉ) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1966gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ PÀqÁØAiÀÄ ¤ªÀøwÛ
G¥À§AzsÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èA¦ü¹ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ
ªÀåªÀºÁgÀ CxÀªÁ ªÁå¥ÁgÀUÀ¼À°è CxÀªÁ
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ GzÉÆåÃUÀzÀ°è
vÉÆqÀV¹PÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ.
19. PÉ.¹.J¸ï. (£ÀqÀvÉ) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1966gÀ PÁ®ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂAiÀÄ PÉ¼ÀV£À ºÀAvÀPÉÌ
G¥À§AzsÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èA¦ü¹, §AqÀªÁ¼À E½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
ºÀÆrPÉ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ, ¸Á®ªÀ£ÀÄß
PÉÆqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ.
20. PÉ.¹.J¸ï. (£ÀqÀvÉ) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ; 1966gÀ PÀ¤µÀÖ ¥ÀPÀë MAzÀÄ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À
G¥À§AzsÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èAX¹ D¹Û ªÀÄvÀÄÛ §rÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀqÉ »rAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
ºÉÆuÉUÁjPÉ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¸À¢gÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
21. PÉ.¹.J¸ï. (£ÀqÀvÉ) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1966gÀ MAzÀÄ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀqÉ
CªÀPÁ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èA¦ü¹ ZÀgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¹ÜgÀ »rAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
D¹ÛUÀ¼À ªÀåªÀºÁgÀ
22. PÉ.¹.J¸ï. (£ÀqÀvÉ) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1966gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ PÀqÁØAiÀÄ ¤ªÀøwÛ
G¥À§AzsÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èAX¹ JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ
ªÀÄzÀÄªÉ ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ.
23. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÁÜ¬Ä ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ½UÉ «gÀÄzÀÞªÁV JgÀqÀÄ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀqÉ
¹¤ªÀiÁ, £ÁlPÀ ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀªÀÅUÀ¼À°è »rAiÀÄÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
¨sÁUÀªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ M¼ÀUÉÆAqÀAvÉ vÉÆqÀV¹
PÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ.
24. PÉ.¹.J¸ï. (PÁAiÀÄð ¤ªÀðºÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢) ªÁUÀÝAqÀ£É (Censure)
¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 2000zÀ CªÀPÁ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
G®èA¦ü¹ ªÁ¶ðPÀ PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÀðºÀuÁ
ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß §gÉAiÀÄ®Ä «¥sÀ®gÁUÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
2. ªÉÄÃ°£À ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸À¯ÁzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ GzÁºÀgÀuÁvÀäPÀ (illustrative) DVªÉAiÉÄÃ

ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ, CªÀÅUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÁå¥ÀPÀªÁV (exhaustive) EgÀÄªÀÅ¢®è. CªÀÅUÀ¼À°è ¸ÉÃj¸ÀzÉÃ EgÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è
AiÀiÁªÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÉ£ÀÄßªÀ §UÉÎ, ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ, CªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
UÀªÀÄ£ÀzÀ°èlÄÖPÉÆAqÀÄ wÃªÀiÁð¤¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
3. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ F
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Á°¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ CªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß CªÀgÀªÀgÀ C¢üÃ£ÀzÀ°è §gÀÄªÀ J¯Áè £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw: ²¸ÀÄÛ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ ¥Á®£ÉUÁV vÀgÀ®Ä ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉÃ±Á£ÀÄ¸ÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ

NOTE
The position regarding powers to impose penalties on the various categories of posts in the
Karnataka Government Secretariat is as follows:-
Sl. Class of Authority Authority Penalties Appellate
No. posts empowered to empowered to (See Rule 8) Authority
appoint impose penalties and
penalties which he
may impose
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Group-D Deputy Secretary (a) Under Secretary (i) Fine Deputy
to Government to Government of (ii) Censure Secretary to
Department of the concerned Government
(iii) With holding
Personnel & Department of the
increments
Administrative Department
Reforms (iii-a) With holding of concerned
promotions.
(iv) Recovery from
pay
(iv-a) Reduction to a
lower stage in time
scale of pay
(b) Deputy Secretary (v) Reduction to Secretary,
to Government lower time scale of Department of
Department of pay Personnel and
Personnel & (vi) Compulsory Administrative
Administrative retirement Reforms
Reforms
(vii) Removal from
Service
(viii) Dismissal from
service
2 Group-C Secretary to (a) Deputy (ii) Censure Secretary to
Government, Secretary/ Joint (iii) With - holding of Government
Department of Secretary/ increments of the
Personnel and Additional Secretary Department
(iii-a) With - holding
Administrative to Government of concerned
of promotion
Reforms the concerned
Department (iv) Recovery from
pay
lower stage in Time
Scale of pay
Deputy Secretary/ (ii) Censure Secretary to
Joint Secretary, (iii) With holding of Government
Department of increments Department of
Personnel and Personnel and
(iii-a) With holding of
Administrative Administrative
promotion
Reforms Reforms
(iv) Recovery from
pay
lower stage in time
Scale of pay
(b) Secretary to (v) Reduction to Additional

Government, lower time scale of Chief
Department of pay Secretary
Personnel and (vi) Compulsory
Administrative Retirement
Reforms
(vii) Removal from
service
service
1 2 3 4 5 6
3 Group-B Government Concerned Principal (ii) Censure Additional
Secretary/ Secretary Chief
Posts (iii) With - holding of
(Section to Government increments Secretary
Officers in (iii-a) With - holding
all the of promotion.
Departments
of (iv) Recovery from
Karnataka pay
Government (iv-a) Reduction to a
Secretariat) lower stage in time
Scale of pay.
Government (v) Reduction to Governor
lower time scale of
pay
(vi) Compulsory
Retirement
(vii) Removal from
service
service
4 Group-A Government Government (ii) Censure Governor
Posts
(iii) With - holding of
(Under increments
Secretary/
Deputy (iii-a) With holding of
Secretary/ promotion
Joint (iv) Recovery from
Secretary/ pay
Additional
Secretary in (iv-a) Reduction to a
All the lower stage in time
Departments Scale of pay.
of (v) Reduction to
Karnataka lower time scale of
Government pay
Secretariat
(vi) Compulsory
Retirement
(vii) Removal from
service
service
Vide para-12 and Appendix (Para-4-C) of G.O. No. DPAR 4 STR 2001, dated 22.11.2001,
the Principal Secretary/ Secretary to Government concerned can rotate the Officers within his
department.
Secretaries to Government are delegated the powers of suspension of Class III and IV
officials of the Karnataka Secretariat Service working under their administrative control vide
Notification No. GAD 38 SSR 74(1) dated 19.10.1974. Secretaries to Government being the
Major Heads of Departments specified in Appendix-I of Karnataka Civil Service Rules are also
empowered to suspend class II officers vide Notification No. DPAR 34 SSR 74, dated 3.9.1976.
Sd/-
(K.L. Jayaram),
Under Secretary to Government-2,
Department of Personnel and Administrative
No. DPAR 876 SRC 2002
Reforms, (Service Rules)
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À°è «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÁV ºÁUÀÆ
ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃªÀÄPÀUÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄUÀ½UÉ ¥ÀæAiÀiÁt ¨sÀvÉå
(Conveyance Allowance) ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ: ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.4.1998gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 3 ¸ÉÃE« 96.
1. E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À°è M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀvÁåA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
PÀAqÀÄ »rAiÀÄ®Ä PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ,
1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11 (2) gÀAvÉ, ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
«ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÉÃ«Ä¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.4.98gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ
£ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀjUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ ¸ÀPÁðj C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ªÀ»¸À§ºÀÄzÁVzÉ. ¸ÀzÀj DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ PÀArPÉ 4(O),
(CA), (DB) zÀ ¸ÀÄ¸ÀA§zÀÞ ¨sÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÉ¼ÀUÉ GzÀÞj¹zÉ:-
(O) ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÁßV ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ £ÉÃ«Ä¹zÀ°è
CªÀjUÉ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÉUÁV gÀÆ. 5000 ¸ÀAavÀ ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß (consolidated
remuneration) ¤ÃqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ, EzÀ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀÄªÀ DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ°è
£ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ, F ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ²¹Û£À
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ½UÉÃ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. F ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ
¥ÁªÀw ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
(CA) CªÀ±Àå«zÀÝ°è, DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀnÖ (Article of charges) AiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¸À®Ä ¥ÀnÖ (panel)
AiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄ : C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉÆ¼Àî§ºÀÄzÀÄ.
DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¸À®Ä AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ MAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¸ÀªÀiÁ¯ÉÆÃa¸À®àlÖ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ
C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CzÉÃ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV £ÉÃ«Ä¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÝ®è. F PÉ®¸ÀPÁÌV
¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è gÀÆ. 1000/- ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ, ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ
zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß (Articles of charges/ Statement of imputations of misconduct)
ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ F ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÁªÀw ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
(DB) CªÀ±Àå«zÀÝ°è ¥ÀnÖ (panel) AiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üÃ±ÀgÀÄ : C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß

ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÁVAiÀÄÆ (As presenting Officers) £ÉÃ«Ä¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ. ºÁUÉ £ÉÃ«Ä¸À¯ÁzÀ
¤ªÀÈvÀÛ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ gÀÆ. 3000/- ¸ÀAavÀ ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÁªÀw ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. F
¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAr¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ ¥ÁªÀw
ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
3. ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.4.1998 gÀ DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ CrAiÀÄ°è «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÁV ºÁUÀÆ
ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃªÀÄPÀUÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀªÀjUÉ ¤ÃqÀ§ºÀÄzÁzÀ ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉaÑ¸ÀÄªÀ «µÀAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß
¸ÀPÁðgÀ ¥Àj²Ã°¹, F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ DzÉÃ²¹zÉ.
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 45 ¸ÉÃE« 2001, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 4£ÉÃ ªÀiÁZïð, 2002
4. ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ; 24.4.1998 gÀ DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ CrAiÀÄ°è «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÁV CxÀªÁ
ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃªÀÄPÀªÁUÀÄªÀªÀgÉUÉ F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ zÀgÀUÀ¼À°è ªÁºÀ£À ¨sÀvÉå (Conveyance Allowance)
ªÀ£ÀÄß F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¤UÀ¢ ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
(C) «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃªÀÄPÀUÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀªÀjUÉ ¥Àæw «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ gÀÆ. 1000/- (gÀÆ. MAzÀÄ
¸Á«gÀ ªÀiÁvÀæ)
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
(D) ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃªÀÄPÀUÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀªÀjUÉ ¥Àæw «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ gÀÆ. 750/- (gÀÆ. K¼ÀÆßgÀ LªÀvÀÄÛ
ªÀiÁvÀæ).
5. F ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß, ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.4.1998gÀ DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ
¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ eÉÆvÉAiÀÄ°è, «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAr¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ ¥ÁªÀw
ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
6. F ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄÄ F DzÉÃ±À ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ eÁjUÉ§gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. CAzÀgÉ F DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ
¢£ÁAPÀzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ, ¢£ÁAPÀ; 24.4.1998 gÀ DzÉÃ±ÀzÀr «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ
ªÀÄAqÀ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÁV £ÉÃªÀÄPÀªÁzÀªÀjUÉ C£ÀéAiÀÄªÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
7. EzÀPÉÌ vÀUÀ®ÄªÀ ªÉZÀÑªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ PÀbÉÃjAiÀÄ ªÉÃvÀ£À ¯ÉPÀÌ ²Ã¶ðPÉ CrAiÀÄ°è ¨sÀj¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
8. F DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ; 7.2.2002 gÀ CzÀgÀ n¥ÀàtÂ ¸ÀASÉå: DE 2683
ªÉZÀÑ-5:2001 gÀ°è ¤ÃrgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀºÀªÀÄwAiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.

«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä GzÉÝÃ²¹zÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀgÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ «ªÀgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ºÁUÀÆ zÉÆÃµÀgÀ»vÀ DzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ
DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ J¸ÀUÀÄªÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À §UÉÎ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ
zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¸À®Ä C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ «¢ü«zsÁ£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÃ½zÉ. CzÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ²¸ÀÄÛ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀévÀB vÁªÉÃ £ÀqÉ¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ CxÀªÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä M§â «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
£ÉÃ«Ä¸À§ºÀÄzÁVzÉ.
2. ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 4.7.1996gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÉ ªÀ»¸ÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÀAiÀÄ¸Àì£ÀÄß £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
3. 1957gÀ ¸ÀzÀj ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À CrAiÀÄ°è DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ
«ªÀgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ AiÀiÁªÁUÀ®Æ EqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ ºÁUÀÆ CzÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ
¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ½UÉ ®¨sÀå ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ:-
(1) ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ
(2) ºÀÄnÖzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ
(3) ªÀAiÉÆÃ¤ªÀÈwÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆAzÀÄªÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ
(4) ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ
(5) ¸ÉÃªÁ CªÀ¢ü
(6) £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ ºÀÄzÉÝ
(7) ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂ ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀÄªÀ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÀ ºÀAvÀ
4. DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ, PÀArPÉ 3 gÀ°è G¯ÉèÃT¸À¯ÁzÀ «ªÀgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀ¥ÀàzÉ
PÀqÀvÀzÀ PÀªÀZÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É zÀ¥Àà CPÀëgÀzÀ°è PÉA¥ÀÄ ±Á¬ÄAiÀÄ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
5. EzÀ®èzÉÃ, zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¹ DzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÁUÀ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
zÉÆÃµÀ¥ÀÆjvÀªÁzÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀA¢UÀÞ DzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß vÀ¦à¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. eÁjUÉÆ½¸À®Ä
¸ÁzsÀå«®èzÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß vÀ¦à¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ gÀÄdÄªÁvÁVªÉ : gÀÄdÄªÁvÁV®è,
ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀàµÀÖªÁzÀ wÃªÀiÁð£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸ÀÄªÀ DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ°è ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
£ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
6. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð ºÁUÀÆ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ F
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Á°¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ CªÀgÀªÀgÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ J¯Áè £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ºÁUÀÆ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À
UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ ¥Á®£ÉUÁV vÀgÀ®Ä ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 22 ¸ÉÃE« 2001, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 5£ÉÃ dÄ¯ÉÊ 2002
«µÀAiÀÄ: ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è Qæ«Ä£À¯ï DgÉÆÃ¥À¢AzÀ RÄ¯Á¸ÉUÉÆAqÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß
¥ÀÅ£ÀB ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è CªÀjUÉ ¤ÃqÀ¨ÉÃPÁzÀ ¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ¼À PÀÄjvÀÄ.
Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ M¼À¥ÀlÄÖ C¥ÀgÁzsÀPÁÌV zÀAqÀ£ÉUÉ UÀÄjAiÀiÁzÀgÉ, DvÀ£ÀÄ
¸À°è¹gÀ§ºÀÄzÁzÀ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À« EvÀåxÀðªÁUÀÄªÀªÀgÉUÀÆ PÁAiÀÄzÉ DvÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ
(ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 14(i)gÀ£ÀÄ¸ÁgÀ ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ
PÉÊUÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÉÝAzÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è w½¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀjzÀÄ, EzÉÃ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ PÀArPÉ 3gÀ°è, MAzÀÄ ªÉÃ¼É D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ
ªÉÄÃ°£À £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è RÄ¯Á¸ÉAiÀiÁzÀgÉ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ vÀ£Àß DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjµÀÌj¹, ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£ÀB ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀ°è, DvÀ£ÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀj¢zÀÝgÉ CºÀð£ÁVgÀÄwÛzÀÝAvÀºÀ
J®è ¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ½UÀÆ ºÀPÀÄÌ¼ÀîªÀ£ÁUÀÄvÁÛ£É JAzÀÄ w½¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
3. ¸ÀªÉÇðÃ£ÀßvÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁAiÀÄ®ªÀÅ J¸ïJ¯ïDgï 1997(1) (¸ÉàµÀ¯ï °Ãªï ¦nµÀ£ï (¹) ¸ÀASÉå:
22538:1996 (Ranchhodji Chaturji Thakore Vs The Superintendent Engineer, Gujarat Electricity
Board, Himmatnagar (Gujarat) and Anr.) 1997(1) SLR 14) ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¢£ÁAPÀ: 28.10.1996
gÀAzÀÄ ¤ÃrgÀÄªÀ wÃ¦ð£À ¸ÀÄ¸ÀA§zÀÞ ¨sÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ GzÀÞj¹zÉ:
"3. The reinstatement of the petitioner into the service has already been ordered by the
High Court. The only question is whether he is entitled to back wages? It was his
conduct of involving himself in the crime that was taken into account for his not being in
services of the respondent. Consequent upon his acquittal, he is entitled to reinstatement
for the reason that his service was terminated on the basis of the conviction by operation
of proviso to the statutory rules applicable to the situation. The question of back wages
would be considered only if the respondents have taken action by way of disciplinary
proceedings and the action was found to be unsustainable in law and he was unlawfully
prevented from discharging the duties. In that context, his conduct becomes relevant.
Each case requires to be considered in his own backdrops. In this case, since the
petitioner had involved himself in a crime, though he was later acquitted, he had
disabled himself from rendering the service on account of conviction and incarceration
in jail. Under these circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled to payment of
backwages. The learned Single Judge and the Division Bench have not committed any
error of law warranting interference.
The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed."
4. ¸ÀªÉÇðÃZÀÑ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ wÃ¦ð£À »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è G¯ÉèÃRzÀ°è£À ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ PÀArPÉ 3gÀ
``DvÀ£ÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀj¢zÀÝgÉ CºÀð£ÁVgÀÄwÛzÀÝAvÀºÀ J®è ¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ½UÀÆ ºÀPÀÄÌ¼ÀîªÀ£ÁUÀÄvÁÛ£É''
JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÆPÀÛªÁV ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¥Àj²Ã°¹, CzÀgÀ §zÀ®Ä PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ ªÀÄgÀÄ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÉ:
``MAzÀÄ ªÉÃ¼É M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£ÀB ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀ°è, ªÀeÁ DzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ
ªÀÄvÉÛ ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀ ¢£ÁAPÀzÀªÀgÉUÉ ¨ÁQ ªÉÃvÀ£À, ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛ, ¸ÉÃªÉ, ¦AZÀtÂ, EvÁå¢
¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ½UÉ CªÀ£ÀÄ ¸ÀéAiÀÄAZÁ°vÀªÁV (automatically) CºÀð£ÁUÀÄªÀÅ¢®è. ¸ÀªÉÇðÃZÀÑ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ,
CzÀgÀ, ªÉÄÃ¯É GzÀÞj¹zÀ wÃ¦ð£À°è ¸ÀÆa¹zÀAvÉ, ¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀð
ºÁUÀÆ ªÁ¸ÀÛªÁA±ÀUÀ¼À »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è ¨ÁQ ªÉÃvÀ£À EvÁå¢ ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä CªÀ£ÀÄ CºÀð£ÉÃ CxÀªÁ E®èªÉÃ?
J£ÀÄßªÀ §UÉÎ ¥Àj²Ã°¹ wÃªÀiÁð¤¸À¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. GzÁºÀgÀuÉUÉ, ¸ÀªÉÇðÃZÀÑ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ, CzÀgÀ, ªÉÄÃ¯É
GzÀÞj¹zÀ wÃ¦ð£À°è G¯ÉèÃT¹zÀAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è, CAvÀºÀ ¸Ë®¨sÀå ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä CºÀðjgÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.''
5. DzÀÝjAzÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¯ÁSÁ
ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Á°¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ ¥Á®£ÉUÁV CzÀ£ÀÄß vÀªÀÄä C¢üÃ£ÀzÀ°è §gÀÄªÀ J¯Áè
£ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀ®Ä PÉÆÃjzÉ.
¦.Dgï. 931 ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ, (¸ÉÃªÁ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ)
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ wÃ¥ÀÄð AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ E®èzÉÃ EzÀÝ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è
CAvÀºÀ wÃ¦ð£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀPÁ®zÀ°è ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ.
G¯ÉèÃR: (1) 25.8.1990gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 25 ¸ÉÃE« 90.
(2) ¢£ÁAPÀ; 9.7.2001gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 6 ¸ÉÃC£Áå 2001.
(3) PÀ£ÁðlPÀ «zsÁ£À ªÀÄAqÀ®zÀ C¢üÃ£À ±Á¸À£À gÀZÀ£Á ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ 2001-2002gÀ
ºÀ£ÉÆßAzÀ£É «zsÁ£À ¸À¨sÉ - E¥ÀàvÉÛAl£ÉÃ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄì.
G¯ÉèÃTvÀ (1)gÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 25.8.1990gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀ GZÀÒ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
EvÀgÉÃ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ jmï Cfð, C¦Ã®Ä ªÀÄ£À« ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄUÀ¼À°è ¤ÃrgÀÄªÀ DzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀåxÀðªÁUÀzÉÃ ¨ÁQ G½¢gÀÄªÀ jmï Cfð, ªÉÆPÀzÀÝªÉÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä ªÀÄ£À«UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÄ£Àgï
CªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2) G¯ÉèÃTvÀ (2)gÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 9.7.2001 gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀ DqÀ½vÀ £ÁåAiÀÄ ªÀÄAqÀ½,
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ GZÀÒ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÉ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤ÃrgÀÄªÀ DzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É PÀæªÀÄ
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
3) «zsÁ£À ªÀÄAqÀ®zÀ C¢üÃ£À ±Á¸À£À gÀZÀ£Á ¸À«Äw 2001-2002 (ºÀ£ÉÆßAzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ «zsÁ£À ¸À¨sÉ) vÀ£Àß
E¥ÀàvÉÛAl£É ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ°è £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ªÉÄÃ®ä£À« ¸À°è¸À®Ä «¼ÀA§ªÁzÀ MAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ¤¹,
``£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ wÃ¥ÀÄð ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ E®èzÉ EzÀÝ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è CAvÀºÀ
wÃ¦ð£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀPÁ®zÀ°è ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¸À®Ä PÀæªÀÄ PÉÊUÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÀÄ'' JAzÀÄ ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄì ªÀiÁrzÉ.
4) C¢üÃ£À ±Á¸À£À gÀZÀ£Á ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ ²¥sÁgÀ¹ì£ÀAvÉ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ wÃ¥ÀÄð ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ E®èzÉÃ EzÀÝ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è CAvÀºÀ wÃ¦ð£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀPÁ®zÀ°è ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¸À°è¸À®Ä PÀæªÀÄ PÉÊUÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
5) DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð : PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ
¸ÀzÀj ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ²¥sÁgÀ¹ì£ÀAvÉ PÀæªÀÄ PÉÊUÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ, F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ J®ègÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ
vÀgÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÄ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃQ¸À®Ä gÀa¸À¯ÁVzÀÝ
¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀzÀÄÝ¥Àr¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR: ¢£ÁAPÀ: 7.1.1987gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉÃ±À ¸ÀASÉå: r¦JDgï 35 J¸ïrE 86.
E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ M¼À¥ÀqÀ°gÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ M¼À¥ÀnÖgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 10 gÀ G¥À¤AiÀÄªÀÄ (6) gÀ°è ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀÄªÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
«ÄÃj CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀj¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ²ð¹ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄì ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ
C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ CzsÀåPÀëvÉAiÀÄ°è ªÉÄÃ¯É G¯ÉèÃR (1) gÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj
DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ°è ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ±ÀðPÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¸À¯ÁVvÀÄÛ.
2. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 10(1)PÉÌ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå r¦JDgï 4 J¸ïrE 2000 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 15.4.2002 gÀ°è
ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁVgÀÄªÀ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr¬ÄAzÁV E£ÀÄß ªÉÄÃ¯É CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ UÀt¤ÃAiÀÄªÁV PÀrªÉÄAiÀiÁUÀÄªÀ
¸ÀA¨sÀªÀ«gÀÄªÀÅzÀjAzÀ F ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ±ÀðPÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀj¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¥ÀÄ£À«ðªÀÄ²ð¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
3. ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è, ºÁ° C¹ÛvÀézÀ°ègÀÄªÀ G¯ÉèÃR (1) gÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹zÀ ¥ÀgÁªÀÄ±ÀðPÀ
¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀPÀët¢AzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀÄªÀAvÉ gÀzÀÄÝ¥Àr¹zÉ.
4. E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÉ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ : PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ
E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À £ËPÀgÀgÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤AiÀÄ«ÄvÀªÁV PÀ¤µÀÖ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ wAUÀ½UÉÆªÉÄä ¥Àj²Ã°¹
wÃªÀiÁð£À vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É ¸À°è¸ÀÄªÀ°è C¥ÀÆtð ªÀiÁ»w : zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¸À°è¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR: ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 09 ¸ÉÃE« 98, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 3.8.1998.
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ ««zsÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ
²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄ : E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ½AzÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É
¸À°è¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀÆªÀðzÀ°è C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À §UÉÎ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 3.8.1998gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è
PÉ®ªÉÇAzÀÄ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVvÀÄÛ. CzÀgÀAvÉ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è
PÀÆ®APÀµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹ ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÁægÀA©ü¸À¨ÉÃPÉ, ¨ÉÃqÀªÉ JA§ÄzÀgÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£É
¥ÀqÉzÀÄ wÃªÀiÁð¤¹ ¸ÀàµÀÖ ºÁUÀÆ ¤¢ðµÀÖ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ¼Àî zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¹zÀÞ¥Àr¹ ªÀÄÆ®
zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ MAzÀÄ ¥Àj¥ÀÆtðªÁzÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ E¯ÁSÉUÉ
PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÆ ºÁUÀÆ ªÀAiÉÆÃ¤ªÀÈwÛ CAa£À°ègÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÝ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ
ªÀÄÄAavÀªÁVAiÉÄÃ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVvÀÄÛ.
2) »ÃUÉ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÀÝgÀÆ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Á°¸ÀzÉÃ, PÉÃªÀ® ¥ÀvÀæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß : zÀÆgÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
AiÀÄxÁªÀvÁÛV ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §A¢zÉ. EzÀjAzÀ
C£ÀUÀvÀåªÁV ¢ÃWÀðPÁ®zÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ªÀåªÀºÁgÀ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀPÁ®zÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÉ ºÀÆqÀ®Ä vÉÆqÀPÁUÀÄªÀ
¥Àj¹Üw GzÀã«¸ÀÄwÛzÉ. vÀvÀàjuÁªÀÄªÁV MmÁÖgÉ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ zÀÄ§ð®ªÁUÀÄªÀÅzÀgÉÆA¢UÉ
£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼À°è G½¹PÉÆ¼ÀîzÀAvÁUÀÄwÛzÉ. F C£ÀUÀvÀå ¥ÀvÀæ ªÀåªÀºÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ vÀqÉAiÀÄ§ºÀÄzÁzÀ
«¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÄÖªÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV ªÉÄÃ°£ÀAvÉ ¥ÀÆtð ¸ÀégÀÆ¥ÀzÀ°è PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À®àqÀÄªÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁvÀæ
¹éÃPÀj¸À®Ä wÃªÀiÁð¤¹zÉ.
3) DzÀÝjAzÀ, ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É ¸À°è¸ÀÄªÁUÀ
F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ:-
1. ¥Àj¥ÀÆtðªÁzÀ zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C£ÀÄ§AzsÀ 1 jAzÀ 4gÀ ªÀgÉUÉ gÀÆ¦¹ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
2. D¥Á¢vÀ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ CPÀÈvÀå¢AzÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ GAmÁVgÀÄªÀ £ÀµÀÖ, G®èAX¹gÀÄªÀ PÁAiÉÄÝ,
PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ, ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀàµÀÖªÁV zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉAiÀÄ°è w½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
3. zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉAiÀÄ C£ÀÄ§AzsÀ 3 gÀ°è PÁtÂ¹zÀ J¯Áè ªÀÄÆ® zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
4. ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß G¯ÉèÃTvÀ
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è£À ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaAiÀÄ£ÀéAiÀÄ ¥Àj²Ã°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
4) F ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹zÀ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸ÀzÉÃ C¥ÀÆtðªÁzÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¹§âA¢
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹zÀÄÝ PÀAqÀÄ§AzÀ°è AiÀiÁªÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ C¢üPÁj¬ÄAzÀ ¹§âA¢
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄÄ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À®ànÖzÉAiÉÆÃ CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð :
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð : C¥ÀgÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð : ¸ÀºÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð : G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð : C¢üÃ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼À
«gÀÄzÀÞ £ÉÃgÀªÁV ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄ ¥ÁægÀA©ü¸À®àqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ JA§ÄzÁV F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖªÀgÉ®èjUÀÆ
w½¹zÉ.
©.J¸ï. ¥ÁnÃ¯ï
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð.
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 12 ¸ÉÃE« 2003, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 19£ÉÃ dÄ¯ÉÊ 2003
«µÀAiÀÄ: ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À°è EgÀÄªÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃPÀ£É §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR: C¢üPÀøvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 19 ¸ÉÃE« 2001, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 28.6.2001.
G¯ÉèÃTvÀ C¢üPÀøvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ DgÀA©ü¹, CzÀ£ÀÄß CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ««zsÀ
ºÀAvÀUÀ½UÉ, UÀjµÀÖ 9 wAUÀ¼À PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ. DzÀgÉ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼ÀÄ F
PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ¼ÀîzÉ ºÉaÑ£À ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîwÛgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÉ.
DzÀÝjAzÀ, J¯Áè E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À°è ¨ÁQ¬ÄgÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À PÀÄjvÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è ¥Àj²Ã®£É ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ CUÀvÀåªÉAzÀÄ ¨sÁ«¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
2. ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀAvÉ ¥Àj²Ã®£É ªÀiÁqÀ®£ÀÄªÁUÀÄªÀAvÉ J¯Áè ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ vÀªÀÄä
C¢üÃ£ÀPÉÆÌ¼À¥ÀqÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ½AzÀ, F ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÉ ®UÀwÛ¹zÀ £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉAiÀÄ°è ¨ÁQ¬ÄgÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À
ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀAUÀæ»¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
3. F ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ 15 ¢£ÀUÀ¼À £ÀAvÀgÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ
CzsÀåPÀëvÉAiÀÄ°è ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀgÉzÀÄ ¨ÉÃgÉ ¨ÉÃgÉ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À°è ¨ÁQ¬ÄgÀÄªÀ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À §UÉÎ
ZÀað¸À¯ÁUÀÄªÀÅzÉAzÀÄ w½¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
JZï.Dgï. £ÁUÉÃAzÀæ
¦.Dgï. 904 ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üÃ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðŠ2,
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ E¯ÁSÉ
PÉëÃvÀæ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ :
PÀæªÀÄ DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «ZÁgÀuÉ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ «¼ÀA§ªÁVzÀÝ°è
¸ÀASÉå ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀzÀ£ÁªÀÄ ¥ÁægÀA©ü¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ ºÀAvÀ PÁgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ
1 2 3 4 5
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è, £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è ºÁUÀÆ
CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVgÀÄªÀ PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ
PÀÄjvÀÄ.
G¯ÉèÃR: (1) C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 14 ¸ÉÃE« 96, ¢£ÁAPÀ; 31.5.1997.
(2) C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 19 ¸ÉÃE« 2001, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 28.6.2001.
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è, £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è ºÁUÀÆ
CAwªÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ°è «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÖ®Ä ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄzÀ ««zsÀ ºÀAvÀUÀ½UÁV UÀjµÀ× PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¢£ÁAPÀ; 28.6.2001gÀ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVvÀÄÛ. ¸ÀzÀj C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ
MlÄÖ 9 wAUÀ¼À CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄPÁÛAiÀÄUÉÆ½¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÁÝVzÉ. F UÀjµÀ×
PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄÄ PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAwzÉ:
²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄzÀ ºÀAvÀ UÀjµÀ× PÁ®«Äw
C) ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ CPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ : zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ²¹Û£À ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ 1 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹ eÁjUÉÆ½¸À®Ä;
D) zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖUÉ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «ªÀgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß 1 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
E) «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß 4 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä
F) «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ CzÀ£ÀÄß ¹éÃPÀj¸ÀÄªÀ 1 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
§UÉÎ ¤tð¬Ä¹®Ä;
G) PÁgÀt PÉÃ¼ÀÄªÀ 2£ÉÃ ¸ÀÆZÀ£Á ¥ÀvÀæªÀ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ 1 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
eÉÆvÉUÉ, D¥Á¢vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ ¤ÃqÀ®Ä
H) CAwªÀÄ DzÉÃ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À®Ä 1 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀAvÉ UÀjµÀ× 9 wAUÀ¼À CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÆtðUÉÆ½¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÁÝVzÉ.
»ÃVzÁÝUÀÆå C£ÉÃPÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À°è Cw «¼ÀA§ªÁUÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ
§A¢zÉ. ¢£ÁAPÀ: 28.6.2001gÀ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è FUÁUÀ¯ÉÃ w½¹gÀÄªÀAvÉ PÁ®«Äw PÀÄjvÀ
F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èAX¹gÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀvÀðªÀå¯ÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄPÉÌ
UÀÄj¥Àr¸À¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ w½¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
©.J¸ï. ¥ÁnÃ¯ï

¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 10 ¸ÉÃE« 2003 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 12£ÉÃ £ÀªÉA§gï 2003
«µÀAiÀÄ : PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ
CrAiÀÄ°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛzÁÝUÀ, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ªÀÄøvÀ£ÁzÁUÀ, E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄA¢£À PÀæªÀÄzÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ
8(iv) gÀ GzsÀøvÀ ¨sÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß F PÉ¼ÀUÉ GzÀÞj¹zÉ.
''(i) xxxxx
(ii) xxxxx
(iii) xxxxx
(iii-a) xxxxx
(iv) gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ CxÀªÁ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁjUÉ JgÀªÀ®Ä PÉÆqÀ¯ÁVvÉÆÛÃ D PÉÃAzÀæ
¸ÀPÁðgÀ, AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ EvÀgÀ gÁdåzÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ, AiÀiÁgÉÃ ªÀåQÛ, ¸ÀA¸ÉÜ CxÀªÁ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÉ, D
C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ¤®ðPÀë å¢AzÀ CxÀªÁ DeÉÕUÀ¼À G®èAWÀ£É¬ÄAzÀ GAmÁzÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ºÀt
gÀÆ¥ÀzÀ £ÀµÀÖªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇtðªÁV CxÀªÁ ¨sÁUÀ±ÀB ªÉÃvÀ£À¢AzÀ ªÀ¸ÀÆ° ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.''
2. ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹zÀAvÉ, DyðPÀ £ÀµÀÖªÀ£ÀÄß DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀjAzÀ ªÀ¸ÀÆ®Ä ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÁzÀ°è,
¸ÀzÀj ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½AiÀÄ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 11 CxÀªÁ 12gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß dgÀÄV¹ ªÀ¸ÀÆ®Ä ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
F jÃw ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹zÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀAvÉ, DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ E¯ÁSÁ
«ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄwÛzÁÝUÀ, DgÉÆÃ¦vÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ªÀÄgÀt ºÉÆA¢zÁUÀ, CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è
AiÀiÁªÀ jÃwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄA¢£À PÀæªÀÄ PÉÊUÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉA§ §UÉÎ C£ÉÃPÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸Àà¶ÖÃPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß PÉÃ½ªÉ.
3. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ GZÀá £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ ¸ÉÖÃmï ¨ÁåAPï D¥sï ªÉÄÊ¸ÀÆgÀÄ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²æÃªÀÄw ¸ÀgÉÆÃd
²æÃ¤ªÁ¸À£ï (LJ¯ïDgï 1997, KAR, 2791) ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ ¥ÀnÖzÉ.
''If any money has been misappropriated by an employee who dies during the
pendency of inquiry, we cannot say that monetary liability arises thereto cannot be
determined even after the death of the delinquent employee, the employer should have
the liberty to assess such financial liability which is to be recoverable out of the
amounts due to the deceased employee on notice being given to the concerned heirs
and i.e. the only way by which the proceedings can be concluded. The respondents
must co-operate with the appellants in the enquiry to enable in establishing guilt or
innocence of the deceased employee and the charge against him. On conclusion of
such Inquiry, though no action can be taken against the deceased, still his monetary
liability can be determined. In taking such action, the appellant will have to take into
consideration the question of amount misappropriated by the deceased employee, the
time lapse between the date of misappropriation and the enquiry and the fact that the
deceased employee is no longer available to defend himself and such other factors. If
they come to the conclusion that still the proceedings should be continued to recover
the amount from out of the amounts due to the said deceased employee, such steps
will have to be taken. Otherwise, any action taken by the appellants can be criticised
as one done arbitrarily without applying the principles of natural justice. Therefore,
we direct the respondents to Inquire into the matter before making any deductions out
of the Provident Fund, Gratuity or any other amounts due to the deceased employee
appropriately one way or the other after issuing notice to the respondents. If a finding
is recorded that there is any monetary liability as-far-as the deceased employee is
concerned, appropriate deductions can be made from the amounts payable to the
respondents otherwise the amounts due to the deceased employee will have to be
disbursed to the respondents.''
4. ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀjAzÀ DyðPÀ £ÀµÀÖ GAmÁVzÀÄÝ, D DgÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ
£ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛzÁÝUÀ, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ªÀÄgÀt ºÉÆA¢zÁUÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄªÀÅ ªÉÄÃ¯É C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ¥ÀlÖAvÉ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ
²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß dgÀÄV¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
5. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ,
ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß J¯Áè ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ PÉÆÃgÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
JZï. Dgï. £ÁUÉÃAzÀæ

¦Dgï. 1453 ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üÃ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðŠ2
(¸ÉÃªÁ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ).
«zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ,
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É
«µÀAiÀÄ : ¢£ÀUÀÆ° DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ ¹§âA¢AiÀÄ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛPÀæªÀÄ
dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
¢£ÀUÀÆ° DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ºÉÆA¢ ¸ÉÃªÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀÄªÀ ºÀ®ªÁgÀÄ
£ËPÀgÀgÀÄ PÀvÀðªÀå ¯ÉÆÃ¥À, ºÀt zÀÄgÀÄ¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀ, ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß J¸ÀVzÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ
UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢zÉ. F £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀiÁªÀ½AiÀÄ£ÀéAiÀÄ PÀæªÀÄ PÉÊUÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀAw®è KPÉAzÀgÉ EªÀgÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ®è. EªÀgÀ
«gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ «zsÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß w½¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ C£ÉÃPÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ
¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉÆÃjªÉ.
F «µÀAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¯ÁVzÉ. ¢£ÀUÀÆ° DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÉÃªÀÄPÁw ºÉÆA¢zÀ, ¹§âA¢AiÀÄÄ
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ J¸ÀVzÁUÀ ªÉÆzÀ°UÉ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉAiÀÄ «ªÀgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤Ãr, D zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ J¸ÀVzÀÝPÁÌV
¸ÀA§A¢üvÀ £ËPÀgÀjUÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ²PÉëAiÀÄ£ÀÄß KPÉ ¤ÃqÀ¨ÁgÀzÉAzÀÄ PÉÃ½ MAzÀÄ £ÉÆÃnÃ¸À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ. ¸ÀzÀj
£ÉÆÃnÃ¹UÉ CªÀgÀÄ ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ GvÀÛgÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÀbÉÃj ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ ¥Àj²Ã°¹ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ wÃªÀiÁð£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÀÄ. MAzÀÄ ªÉÃ¼É, PÀbÉÃj ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ°£À DgÉÆÃ¥ÀªÀÅ ¸Á©ÃvÁVzÉ JA§
wÃªÀiÁð£ÀPÉÌ §AzÀ°è, MAzÀÄ «ªÀgÀªÁzÀ DzÉÃ±À (Speaking Order) ªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¹ vÀPÀÌzÁzÀ
zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ. «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÁzÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÉAzÀgÉ dÄ¯Áä£É (fine), ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ £ÀµÀÖ GAlÄ
ªÀiÁrzÀÝ°è D £ÀµÀÖªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀ¸ÀÆ®Ä ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ, ¢£ÀUÀÆ° ¸ÉÃªÉ¬ÄAzÀ vÉUÉzÀÄºÁPÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
¸Á©ÃvÁVzÉAiÉÄAzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ§AzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ UÀA©üÃgÀvÉUÉ C£ÀÄUÀÄtªÁzÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÁVzÉ.
JZï.Dgï. £ÁUÉÃAzÀæ
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 5 ¸ÉÃE« 2004, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 19£ÉÃ dÆ£ï 2004
«µÀAiÀÄ: PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ,
1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 10PÉÌ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr.
G¯ÉèÃR: 1. C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: r¦JDgï 13 J¸ïrE 85, ¢£ÁAPÀ 3.7.1985.
2. C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: r¦JDgï 24 ¸ÉÃE« 88, ¢£ÁAPÀ 6.6.1988.
4. C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: r¦JDgï 3 J¸ïrE 94, ¢£ÁAPÀ 26.2.1994.
5. ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 16 ¸ÉÃE« 96, ¢£ÁAPÀ 21.4.1997.
6. C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 2 ¸ÉÃE« 97, ¢£ÁAPÀ 8.7.1997.
10. C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå: r¦JDgï 4 J¸ïrE 2000, ¢£ÁAPÀ 15.4.2002.
G¯ÉèÃR (1)gÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 3.7.85gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß
AiÀiÁªÀ AiÀiÁªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è Ej¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ JA§ §UÉÎ ºÁUÀÆ vÀ¤SÉ/«ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¨ÁQ¬ÄlÄÖ F CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß JµÀÄÖ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄªÀgÉUÉ ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀgÉ¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ JA§ §UÉÎ «ªÀj¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
2. G¯ÉèÃR (2)gÀ°ègÀÄªÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 6.6.1988gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ
UÀÄgÀÄvÀgÀªÁzÀ D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ½®èzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èlÄÖ DzÉÃ±À ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß ¢£ÁAPÀ
3.7.1985gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è£À ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À CrAiÀÄ°è ¥Àj²Ã°¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ EAvÀºÀ £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß
¨ÉÃgÉ ¸ÀÜ¼ÀPÉÌ ªÀUÁð¬Ä¸ÀÄªÀ ¸ÁzsÀåvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¸ÀÄªÀAvÉ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
3. G¯ÉèÃR (3)gÀ°ègÀÄªÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 26.6.1989gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ®AZÀ ¤ªÀÄÆð®£À
C¢ü¤AiÀÄªÀÄzÀ CrAiÀÄ°è CxÀªÁ E£ÁßªÀÅzÉÃ «µÀAiÀÄPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ vÀ¤SÉUÉ M¼ÀUÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÆtð vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÁ¬ÄÝj¹ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀAvÉ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ, E£ïì¥ÉPÀÖgï
d£ÀgÀ¯ïgÀªÀjAzÀ §gÀÄªÀ ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄìUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DzÀåvÉ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¥Àj²Ã°¹ JgÀqÀÄ ªÁgÀUÀ¼ÉÆ¼ÀUÁV ¸ÀÆPÀÛ PÀæªÀÄ
PÉÊUÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
4. G¯ÉèÃR (4)gÀ°è£À ¢£ÁAPÀ 26.2.1994gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÉÃªÉUÉ C£À¢üPÀÈvÀªÁV
UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄzÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. F
C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ PÀArPÉ 6gÀ G¥À PÀArPÉ (3) ªÀÄvÀÄÛ (4)gÀ°è C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ UÉÊgÀÄºÁdgÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ w½¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
5. G¯ÉèÃR (5)gÀ°è£À ¢£ÁAPÀ 21.4.1997gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è J¯Áè ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀÄ£Àgï £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ DVAzÁUÉÎ ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀÄªÀ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ£ÀzÀ°èlÄÖPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀAvÉ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
6. G¯ÉèÃR (6)gÀ°è£À ¢£ÁAPÀ 8.7.1997gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ®AZÀ
¤gÉÆÃzsÀ PÁAiÉÄÝ 1988gÀ CrAiÀÄ°è Qæ«Ä£À¯ï C¥ÀgÁzsÀzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ°è CxÀªÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ°èzÁÝUÀ
CAvÀºÀ £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è EqÀ¨ÁgÀzÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ¨sÁ«¹zÀ°è AiÀiÁªÀ jÃwAiÀÄ PÀæªÀÄ
PÉÊUÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
7. G¯ÉèÃR (7)gÀ°è£À ¢£ÁAPÀ 5.8.1998gÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÕÁ¥À£À, G¯ÉèÃR (8) ªÀÄvÀÄÛ (9) gÀ°è£À
¢£ÁAPÀ: 29.8.2000gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞzÀ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¥ÀÆtðUÉÆ½¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ ZÁeïð ¶Ãl£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è zÁR°¸ÀÄªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðj
£ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ ¨Áj CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è EqÀ§ºÀÄzÉÃ JA§ §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï
£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è zÀAqÀ£ÉUÉ M¼ÀUÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ zÀAqÀ£É DzÉÃ±ÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ vÀqÉAiÀiÁeÉÕ
¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÁUÀ¯ÁUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À« EvÀåxÀðzÀ°ègÀÄªÁUÀ eÁ«ÄÃ¤£À ªÉÄÃ¯É
©qÀÄUÀqÉAiÀiÁzÁUÀ¯ÁUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ C¥ÀgÁzsÀ ¤tðAiÀÄ vÀqÉ»rzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄzÀ
PÀÄjvÀÄ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
8. G¯ÉèÃR (10)gÀ°è£À ¢£ÁAPÀ 15.4.2002gÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¹«¯ï ¸ÉÃªÁ
(ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃ®ä£À«) ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1957gÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄPÉÌ wzÀÄÝ¥ÀrAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
»ÃUÉ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁVgÀÄªÀ ¤AiÀÄªÀÄ 10 gÀ ¸ÀÄ¸ÀA§zÀÞ ¨sÁUÀ F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀAwzÉ:-
"10 (1) The Appointing Authority or any authority to which it is sub-ordinate or any other
authority empowered by the Government in this behalf may place a Government servant under
suspension-
(a) Where there is prima facie evidence to show that he was caught red-handed while
accepting gratification other than legal remuneration by the persons authorised to
investigate under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 or under
any other law;
(b) where a charge sheet is filed before the competent Court against him for any offence
involving moral turpitude committed in the course of his duty; or
(c) where a charge sheet is filed before the competent Court against him on charges of
corruption, embezzlement or criminal misappropriation of Government money;
(d) where there is prima facie evidence of gross dereliction of duty against him."
(2) A Government servant shall be deemed to have been placed under suspension by an
order of appointing authority-
(a) with effect from the date of his detention, if he is detained in custody, whether on a
criminal charge or otherwise, for a period exceeding forty-eight hours;
(b) with effect from the date of his conviction, if in the event of a conviction for an
offence, he is sentenced to a term of imprisonment exceeding forty-eight hours and is
not forthwith dismissed or removed or compulsorily retired consequent to such
conviction.
Explanation:- The period of forty-eight hours referred to in clause (b) of this sub-rule
shall be computed from the commencement of the imprisonment after the conviction and for this
purpose, intermittent periods of imprisonment if any, shall be taken into account."
ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀð / ¸À¤ßªÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À®èzÉ ¨ÉÃgÉ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀð / ¸À¤ßªÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß
CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èj¸À®Ä CªÀPÁ±À«gÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.
9. DzÀÝjAzÀ, AiÀiÁªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀð:¸À¤ßªÉÃ±ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èj¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ JA§
§UÉÎ ªÉÄÃ¯É (1) jAzÀ (9) gÀªÀgÉUÉ G¯ÉèÃT¹gÀÄªÀ C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÕÁ¥À£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À°è K£ÉÃ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÀÝgÀÆ CªÀÅ G¯ÉèÃR (10)gÀ°è£À ¢£ÁAPÀ 15.4.2002gÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è£À
wzÀÄÝ¥Àr¬ÄAzÁV ¤gÀxÀðPÀªÁVªÉ. DzÀÝjAzÀ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 15.4.2002gÀ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è w½¹gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è ªÀiÁvÀæ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è Ej¸À§ºÀÄzÁVzÉ.
10. ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è EqÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁgÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ J¯Áè ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ F
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ£ÀzÀ°èj¹PÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
PÉ.gÀWÀÄgÁªÀiï ¨sÀAqÁj
¦.Dgï. 701 ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 1 ¸ÉÃE« 2005 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 9£ÉÃ ¥sÉ§æªÀj 2005
«µÀAiÀÄ : E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É ¸À°è¸ÀÄªÀ°è C¥ÀÇtð ªÀiÁ»w/ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¸À°è¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ.
G¯ÉèÃR : 1. ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 9 ¸ÉÃE« 98 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 3.8.98.
2. ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 7 ¸ÉÃE« 2003 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 12.5.2003.
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄªÀ ««zsÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ
PÀæªÀÄ/ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ dgÀÄV¸ÀÄªÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ½AzÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É ¸À°è¸ÀÄªÀ
¥ÀÇªÀðzÀ°è C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À §UÉÎ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 3.8.98 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 12.5.2003gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À°è
PÉ®ªÉÇAzÀÄ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVvÀÄÛ. CzÀgÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è
PÀÆ®APÀÄµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹ ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÁægÀA©ü¸À¨ÉÃPÉ, ¨ÉÃqÀªÉÃ JA§ÄzÀgÀ §UÉÎ E¯ÁSÁ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ
C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£É ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ §UÉÎ MAzÀÄ ¤¢üðµÀÖ wÃªÀiÁð£ÀPÉÌ §AzÀÄ ¸ÀàµÀÖ ºÁUÀÆ ¤¢üðµÀÖ
DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ¼Àî ¥Àj¥ÀÇtðªÁzÀ zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C£ÀÄ§AzsÀ 1 jAzÀ 4 ¹zÀÞ¥Àr¹, F
zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼À°è D¥Á¢vÀ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ¬ÄAzÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ GAmÁVgÀÄªÀ £ÀµÀÖ,
G®èAX¹gÀÄªÀ PÁAiÉÄÝ, PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ, ¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀàµÀÖªÁV C¼ÀªÀr¹ ªÀÄÆ® zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ
¥Àj¥ÀÇtðªÁzÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ
ªÀAiÉÆÃ ¤ªÀøwÛ CAa£À°ègÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞzÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄzÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ
ªÀÄÄAavÀªÁVAiÉÄÃ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVvÀÄÛ.
2. »ÃUÉ ºÀ®ªÁgÀÄ ¨Áj ¸ÀàµÀÖ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÀÝgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DqÀ½vÀ
E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥Á°¸ÀzÉ PÉÃªÀ® ¥ÀvÀæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß/ zÀÆgÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß AiÀÄxÁªÀvÁÛV ¹D¸ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄwÛgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ
PÀAqÀÄ §A¢zÉ. ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À°è£À ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ UÀA©üÃgÀªÁV
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîwÛ®è. F jÃw UÀA©üÃgÀªÁV vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀîzÉ ºÁUÀÆ C£ÀUÀvÀåªÁV ¢ÃWÀð PÁ®zÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ªÀåªÀºÁgÀ
£ÀqÉ¸ÀÄªÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀPÁ®zÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÉ ºÀÆqÀ®Ä vÉÆqÀPÁUÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ D¥Á¢vÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞzÀ
zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼ÀÄ zÀÄ§ð®UÉÆ¼ÀÄîwÛªÉ. F »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è ªÉÄÃ®ÌAqÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À°è w½¹gÀÄªÀ
¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÀÄZÀÑj¸ÀÄvÁÛ F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À §UÉÎ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ UÀªÀÄ£À ºÀj¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ
ºÁUÀÆ EzÀ£ÀÄß ¥Á°¸ÀzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ £ÉÃgÀªÁV dªÁ¨ÁÝgÀgÁVgÀÄvÁÛgÉAzÀÄ CAvÀºÀªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ
PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß dgÀÄV¸À¯ÁUÀÄªÀÅzÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀàµÀÖ¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ. C£ÀUÀvÀå ¥ÀvÀæ ªÀåªÀºÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ DUÀ§ºÀÄzÁzÀ
«¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÉUÀlÄÖªÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV ªÉÄÃ°£ÀAvÉ ¥ÀÇtð ¸ÀégÀÆ¥ÀzÀ°è PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹PÉÆqÀÄªÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁvÀæ
¹éÃPÀj¸À®Ä wÃªÀiÁð¤¹zÉ.
3. DzÀÝjAzÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¹D¸ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É ¸À°è¸ÀÄªÁUÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 3.8.98 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
12.5.2003gÀ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉUÀ¼À°è w½¹gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Á°¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ F PÉ¼ÀPÀAqÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
1. DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ ¤¢ðµÀÖ/RavÀªÁzÀ zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼À PÀgÀqÀ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹ CzÀgÀ°è
C¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ J¸ÀVgÀÄªÀ zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀàµÀÖ «ªÀgÀuÉ, ¸ÀzÀj zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ¬ÄAzÀ AiÀiÁªÀ
¤AiÀÄªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß/ PÁ£ÀÆ£À£ÀÄß G®èAX¸À¯ÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀàµÀÖªÁV w½¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
2. DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¹D¸ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀaªÀgÀ
C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
3. zÀÆgÀÄ EvÁå¢ ¦üAiÀiÁðzÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß AiÀÄxÁªÀvÁÛV ¹D¸ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÁgÀzÀÄ. CAvÀºÀ
zÀÆgÀÄUÀ¼À §UÉÎ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀ ªÀgÀ¢/ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ DqÀ½vÀ
E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀàµÀÖ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄzÉÆA¢UÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
4. ¤ªÀøwÛAiÀÄ CAa£À°ègÀÄªÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄªÀ°è E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ «¼ÀA§ªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÁgÀzÀÄ. »ÃUÉ PÉÆ£ÉUÀ½UÉAiÀÄ°è ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¹.D.¸ÀÄ. E¯ÁSÉUÉ
PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹zÀ°è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CAvÀºÀ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄÄ PÁ®«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ÄÃjzÁÝzÀ°è «¼ÀA§PÉÌ dªÁ¨ÁÝgÀgÁzÀ
£ËPÀgÀgÀÄ/ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀÄgÀÄw¹ CªÀgÀÄUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À¯ÁUÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ.
5. ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀiÁzÀ ¹.D.¸ÀÄ. E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ PÀÄjvÀAvÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¤tðAiÀÄ CxÀªÁ
¸Àà¶ÖÃPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀÝ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è CAvÀºÀ PÀæªÀÄzÀ §UÉÎ DqÀ½vÀ
E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤zÉðÃ±À£À ¤ÃqÀÄªÀÅzÁUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ ¹.D.¸ÀÄ. E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ PÀæªÀÄªÀ£ÀÄß
¥Àæ²ß¸ÀÄªÀ/nÃQ¸ÀÄªÀ jÃwAiÀÄ°è n¥ÀàtÂUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹ «ZÁgÀuÁ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¼ÀA§
ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß UÀA©üÃgÀªÁV ¥ÀjUÀtÂ¹ dªÁ¨ÁÝgÀgÁzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀæªÀÄ
dgÀÄV¸À¯ÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
6. ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ºÀAvÀzÀ°è ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É/ ¸Àà¶ÖÃPÀgÀt/GvÀÛgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¹D¸ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÉ
PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß vÀ¥ÀàzÉÃ E¯ÁSÁ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀÄªÀgÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
7. DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¹D¸ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀÄªÁUÀ zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉAiÀÄ
C£ÀÄ§AzsÀ 3 gÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄªÀ J¯Áè ªÀÄÆ® zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. ºÁUÀÆ EAvÀºÀ
zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À MAzÀÄ ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ G½¹PÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ. ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀÅ
CAwªÀÄUÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ vÀ£ÀPÀ ªÀÄÆ® zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ½UÉ »AwgÀÄV¸À¯ÁUÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.
4. F ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹zÀ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C£ÀÄ¸Àj¸ÀzÉ C¥ÀÇtðªÁzÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄzÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹zÀÄÝ PÀAqÀÄ §AzÀ°è CAvÀºÀ C¥ÀÇtðªÁzÀ
¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ ªÀÄlÖzÀ C¢üPÁj¬ÄAzÀ ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉUÉ
PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À®ànÖzÉAiÉÆÃ CAvÀºÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð/ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð/ C¥ÀgÀ
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð/ ¸ÀºÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð/ G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð/ C¢üÃ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÆ ¸ÉÃjzÀAvÉ £ÉÃgÀªÁV
²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄ ¥ÁægÀA©ü¸À®àqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ JA§ÄzÁV F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖªÀgÉ®èjUÀÆ w½¹zÉ.
5. F ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ£Àå ªÀÄÄRå ªÀÄAwæAiÀÄªÀgÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£É ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
PÉ. PÉ. «Ä±Àæ
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore, dated: 9th February 2005.
CIRCULAR
Sub:- Furnishing incomplete information/records while recommending for initiating
Departmental Enquiries-reg.
Ref:-(i) Circular No. DPAR 9 SDE 98 dated 3-8-98.
(ii) Circular No. DPAR 7 SDE 2003 dated 12-5-2003.
In the Circulars dated 3-8-1998 and 12-5-2003 cited above, certain guidelines were
issued indicating the procedure to be followed by the Administrative Departments
concerned before sending proposals for initiating disciplinary action/departmental enquiry
against the officers coming under the purview of DPAR. As per these instructions the
departments with the approval of the Ministers concerned should come to a conclusion as
to whether departmental enquiry should be initiated or not; thereafter articles of charges
with Annexures I to IV including specific and definite articles of charges should be
prepared; these articles of charges should clearly indicate the loss caused to Government
as a result of the misconduct of the accused officer, the Act/Law/Rule violated should be
clearly mentioned and the complete proposal with all the original documents should be
sent to DPAR. It was also indicated in these circulars that proposals for taking
disciplinary action against officers who are on the verge of retirement should be sent well
in advance.
2. Inspite of repeated and clear instructions as above, it is found that the
administrative departments are not complying with these instructions but are sending
papers/allegations to the DPAR without examining them. The administrative departments
have not taken the above mentioned circulars seriously. Consequently there is protracted
correspondence between the departments and departmental enquires are not initiated in
time; the charges against the officers also get weakened. In this background, while
reiterating the above mentioned circulars, the attention of the administrative departments
is drawn to the following instructions and it is clarified that disciplinary action will be
taken against those officers who do not comply with these instructions. With a view to
prevent unnecessary correspondence and to avoid delay, it has been decided to receive
only such proposals which are complete in all respects as indicated above.
3. Therefore, while sending the proposals regarding disciplinary cases to DPAR in
addition to complying with the instructions contained in the Circulars dated 3-8-98 and 12-
5-2003, the following instructions also should be adhered to:
1. The administrative departments should prepare specific/definite articles of
charges indicating therein a clear statement of the misconduct, the Rule/Law
which has been violated as a result of the misconduct.
2. The administrative departments should obtain the approval of the Ministers
concerned before sending proposals to DPAR.
3. Complaints or allegations against the officers should not be sent to DPAR
without examination. Such allegations/complaints should be sent to DPAR
after obtaining the report/opinion of the Head of the Department concerned and
with the definite opinion of the Department.
4. The departments should not delay the proposals relating to the officers who are
about to retire. If such proposals are sent to DPAR at the last moment and the
enquiry becomes time-barred, the officers/officials responsible for delay will
have to be identified and action will be taken against them.
5. In cases where the DPAR conveys a decision or seeks clarifications from the
departments, the administrative departments should not send notes to DPAR
questioning or commenting on the stand of DPAR or giving direction to DPAR
thereby delaying the process. Action will have to be taken against the officers
responsible for such notes/replies and consequent delays.
6. At any stage of the enquiry, before sending proposals/clarifications/replies to
DPAR the approval of the Secretary of the Department concerned should
invariably be obtained.
7. While sending the disciplinary cases to the DPAR the departments should send
all the documents mentioned in Annexure-III in original. The departments
should keep a copy of the documents with them. The original documents may
not be returned to the departments until the departmental enquiry is completed.
4. If it is noticed that incomplete proposals are sent to DPAR in violation of the above
mentioned instructions, disciplinary action will have to be taken against the officers
including Principal Secretary/Secretary/ Addl. Secretary/ Joint Secretary/ Deputy
Secretary/ Under Secretary who send such incomplete proposals to DPAR.
5. This Circular is issued with the approval of the Hon'ble Chief Minister.
K.K. Misra
Chief Secretary.
¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, ¸ÀPÁðj PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀÄÄzÀæuÁ®AiÀÄ, ¦Ãtå, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ

karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

IMPORTANT GOVERNMENT ORDERS/

From 1956 upto 9-2-2005

DPAL 44 RASAPRA 2006

From 1956 upto 9-2-2005

DPAL 44 RASAPRA 2006

1 Cir. AD 19181-94 SE (AC) Procedure in Anti - Corruption cases.

2 G.O. GAD 18 PHS 57 20.3.1957 Prompt transmission of appeals of

3 O.M. GAD (S-1) 80 RSR 57 Notifying the dismissal of Government

4 O.M. OSD 2 SMR 57 Procedure for consulting the Public Service

5 G.O. RD 185-RGP 57/2023-26A Departmental enquiries-Instuctions for

6 Cir. GAD (S-1) 25 SSR 57 Anti-Corruption cases-punishment.

7 O.M. GAD (OM) 9 SMR 57 Procedure for submission of

8 O.M. GAD (OM) 3 CAR 57 Procedural instructions regarding the

9 O.M. GAD (S-1) 80 RSR 57 Preparation and submission of quarterly

10 O.M. GAD (S-1) 80 RSR 57 Quarterly statements of dismissals of

19 O.M. GAD 8 OSR 59 Supply of copies of evidence, etc. to

20 O.M. GAD (S-1) 23 SSR 59 "Warning" and "Censure" Distinction

21 O.M. GAD (S-1) 44 SSR 59 Imposition of penalty of reduction

22 O.M. GAD (S-1) 56 SSR 59 Promotion of Government servants whose

23 O.M.6400/58-15 States Reorganisation-Appeals against

24 O.M. GAD 49 DIF 59 Procedure in respect of Disciplinary

25 G.O. GAD 21 OSR 60. 28.7.1960. Departmental enquiries-Taking the

26 O.M. GAD 35 SSR 60 15.10.1960. Dismissal of Government servants in Public

27 O.M. GAD 92 SRS 60 1.12.1960 Clarification regarding Rule 59, Mysore

35 O.M. GAD 31 SRR 64 Instructions regarding preparation and

36 O.M. GAD 21 SSR 65 Public service-circumstances under which a

37 O.M. GAD 105 SRR 64, Public services-Departmental proceedings

38 O.M. GAD 129 SRR 65 Preparation and submission of half yearly

39 O.M. GAD 171 SSR 65 Departmental enquiries under Rule 14 of

40 Cir. GAD 18 SSR 66 Instructions to officers to offer cooperation

41 O.M.GAD 80 SSR 65 dt. 11.4.1966 Promotion of Government servants involved

42 Cir. ED 34 RPS 67 Letter No. G 6598 dated 15.12.1996 from

43 O.M. GAD 42 PVC 66 Stipulation of time limit for completing the

47 O.M. GAD 47 SSR 68 Publication of notices in respect of

48 O.M. GAD 57 PVC 68 Disposal of cases received from the State

50 O.M. GAD 7 SSR 69 Penalty of reduction-specifying the period

53 O.M. GAD 26 SSR 72 Departmental Enquiries-failure to follow the

54 Cir. GAD 29 SSR 72 State Vigilance Commission Nature of

55 O.M. GAD 1 SSR 73 Government servants involved in the

56 O.M. GAD 18 SSR 73 Withholding of increment (s) with

57 G.O. GAD 4 SSR 74 Departmental Enquiry Proceedings

63 G.O. GAD 6 SSR 75 Procedure for drawing remuneration by the

64 Cir. GAD 14 SSR 75 Instructions regarding Disciplinary

65 D.O. GAD 23 IPN 75 Cases of Vigilance Commission

66 O.M. FD 213 SRS 71 Rule 59 of the Karnataka Civil Services

67 No. GAD 24 SSR 75, Powers of Deputy Commissioners inrespect

68 O.M. GAD 2 SSR 76 Appeal petitions/Review petitions to the

69 Cir. DPAR 70 SSR 76 Karnataka Civil Services (Classification,

70 O.M. DPAR 18 SSR 77, Disciplinary proceedings against

71 O.M. DPAR 11 SSR 77 Suspension of Government servants

72 Cir. DPAR 28 SSR 77 Clarification regarding 'mis-appropriation'

74 Cir. DPAR 24 SSR 78 Imposition of penalty of withholding of

79 Cir. DPAR 18 SSR 79 Departmental enquiries-cases to be referred

80 Cir. DPAR 30 SSR 79 Un-authorised absence of Government

81 Cir. DPAR 46 SSR 79 Appointment of Presenting Officers in

82 Cir. DPAR 2 SIN 79 Communications to be addressed to the

83 Cir. DPAR 71 PVC 78 Reinstatement of Government servants

84 Cir. DPAR 56 SSR 78 Karnataka Civil Services (Classification,

85 Cir. DPAR 80 SSR 79 Clarification regarding sanction of

86 Cir. DPAR 17 SSR 80 Avoiding unnecessary references to Govt. in

87 Cir. DPAR 61 SSR 80 Service of order, notices etc. under Rule 28

88 Cir. DPAR 17 SSR 79 Suspension of Government servants-further