You are on page 1of 10

Aquaculture Research, 2010, 1^10 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02457.

Protein lipid ratio for the growth and survival of juvenile


crayfish Procambarus acanthophorus (Hobbs 1972)
reared under controlled conditions

Enrique Cervantes-Santiago1, Martha P. HernaŁndez-Vergara1, Carlos I. Pe¤rez-Rostro1 &


Miguel A. Olvera-Novoa2
1
Laboratorio de Nutricio¤n Acu|¤ cola, Divisio¤n de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigacio¤n, Instituto Tecnolo¤gico de Boca del R|¤ o,
Veracruz, Me¤xico
2
Centro de Investigacio¤n y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N., Unidad Me¤rida,YucataŁn, Me¤xico

Correspondence: M P HernaŁndez-Vergara, Laboratorio de Nutricio¤n Acu|¤ cola, Divisio¤n de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigacio¤n.
Instituto Tecnolo¤gico de Boca del R|¤ o, Km. 12 Carr, Veracruz-Cordoba, C.P. 94290, Veracruz, Me¤xico. E-mail: mphv1@yahoo.
com.mx

Abstract Introduction
The in£uence of dietary protein/lipid levels on Commercial aquaculture with crustaceans in Mexi-
growth and survival in juvenile cray¢sh (Procam- co, as in other places around the world, has begun
barus acanthophorus) was evaluated during a12-week with the culture of exotic species. Native organisms
nutritional trial. Twenty experimental diets were for- are rarely used, largely due to the market demand
mulated containing di¡erent protein (200, 250, 300, for large and traditional crustaceans (prawns,
350 and 400 g kg  1) and lipid (60, 80, 100 and shrimp, crabs and lobsters), the short supply informa-
120 g kg  1) levels. A bifactorial model (5  4) was tion on these species and the limited aquaculture fa-
used with three replicates and 15 cray¢sh cilities using them (DOF 2006). These factors may
(0.014  0.006 g) per replicate, in a recirculation sys- have delayed the development of culture biotechnol-
tem with 60^15 L rectangular tanks and a biological ogies for native organisms, but aquaculture requires
¢lter, the culture conditions were a photoperiod of diversi¢cation and Procambarus sp. is a promising op-
12:12 h L:D and temperature 24.7  1.0 1C. Total sur- tion. Some authors promote the diversi¢cation and
vival ranged from 66.6% to 86.6%, with no di¡er- research to develop technologies that allow culture
ences attributed to treatments. Dietary protein of biological and commercial important native spe-
levels had a signi¢cant e¡ect on growth gain and nu- cies instead of introduced ones, which will have irre-
tritional e⁄ciency; in contrast, lipid levels had no ef- versible environmental impacts (AŁlvarez-Torres,
fect on juvenile performance. The 250/120 (protein/ Soto, Avile¤s-Quevedo, D|¤ az-Luna & Trevino-Carrillo
lipid) treatment promoted the most e⁄cient growth 1998; Galvao & Bueno 2000; Rodr|¤ guez-Serna Car-
(¢nal weight: 3.09 g, weight gain: 21995%, speci¢c mona-Osalde, Olvera-Novoa & Arredondo-Figueroa
growth rate: 3.35% day  1); the less e⁄cient growth 2000).
was observed in juveniles fed with 400 g kg  1 pro- A good option for crustacean aquaculture is cray-
tein diets. The quadratic regression model indicated ¢sh, which are cosmopolitan organisms found in all
279 g kg  1 as the optimal protein level for cray¢sh the continents, except Africa, and include about 500
growth, while levels between 211 and 232 g kg  1 species (Fowler, Lorio & Lutz 1994). The cray¢sh in-
could minimize the feeding costs without a¡ecting dustry in the Unites States is an important activity
growth. with good economic yields, but in most countries,
including Mexico, it is only used in small ¢sheries,
Keywords: cray¢sh, Procambarus acanthophorus, for biological and conservation research. Actually,
protein requirements, growth, lipid, survival some cray¢sh species have a huge potential for

r 2010 The Authors


Journal Compilation r 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1
Protein lipid ratio for growth and survival of juvenile cray¢sh E Cervantes-Santiago et al. Aquaculture Research, 2010, 1^10

aquaculture facilies including Procambarus acan- seeking the best diet for the organism in culture. The
thophorus, because of their simple cycle life, and objective of the present study was to determine the
adaptation to di¡erent environments and cavtivity most e⁄cient P/L ratio in diets for juvenile P. acantho-
conditions (Cervantes-Santiago 2008). The culture phorus, to increase growth and survival and promote
of any aquatic species requires knowledge of its biolo- sustainable cray¢sh culture using diets that inte-
gic aspects, environment preferences and feed re- grated their nutritional requirements at the lowest
quirements to develop diets that cover its metabolic cost.
and growth needs. The nutritional requirements in
crustaceans vary widely in relation to the species,
Materials and methods
age and individual physiological condition, feeding
habits, dietary protein components and culture tech- Juvenile cray¢sh P. acanthophorus (initial weight
nique (D’Abramo & Sheen 1994; HernaŁndez-Vergara, 0.014  0.006 g) were selected from a stock main-
Rouse & Olvera-Novoa 2001).Vital roles in crustacean tained in the reproduction area of the Native Crusta-
nutrition are recognized in the protein and lipid le- ceans Laboratory, of the InstitutoTecnologico of Boca
vels because they provide the energy required for del R|¤ o, Veracruz, Mexico, for a 12-week nutritition
maintenance, muscle generation, growth and repro- trial (December 2007 to February 2008) to evaluate
duction (Guillaume 1997; Thompson, Muzinic, Eng- growth and survival under controlled conditions.
ler, Morton, & Webster 2004); for this reason, it is
necessary to know the requirements in crustaceans
Experimental design and system
with aquaculture potential.
In some cray¢sh, the dietary protein requirement A bifactorial (5  4) design was used to evaluate 20
is between 200 and 300 g kg  1 and lipid from 40 to experimental diets formulated containing di¡erent
60 g kg  1 for optimum growth (Jover, FernaŁndez- protein (200, 250, 300, 350 and 400 g kg  1) and lipid
Carmona, Del R|¤ o & Soler 1999; HernaŁndez-Vergara (60, 80, 100 and 120 g kg  1) ratios, with three repli-
et al. 2001; HernaŁndez-Vergara, Rouse, Olvera-Novoa cates and 15 organisms per replicate in a completely
& Davis 2003). The noble cray¢sh Astacus astacus randomized design. The experiment was conduced
need around 200^300 g kg  1 dietary protein with under controlled environmental conditions (12 h
at least150 and 200 g kg  1 animal protein for proper L:12 h D photoperiod, and 24.7  1.0 1C temperature)
growth (Lovell 1989), while red swamp cray¢sh Pro- in a recirculation system with tap water and 60^15 L
cambarus clarkii require between 250 and 350 g kg  1 rectangular plastic tanks with lateral drainage, and a
(Guillaume 1997). In terms of lipid requirements, constant water £ow (1L min  1), mechanical and
white river craw¢sh Procambarus acutus acutus need biological ¢lter and 15 sections of a PVC tube of 4 cm
60 g kg  1 dietary lipid for good growth; in contrast length  1.99 cm diameter for each experimental
with the ¢rst one, cray¢sh Procambarus llamasi re- unit, used for juvenile refuge in the ecdysis period
quire at least a 200/120 g kg  1 [protein/lipid (P/L)] (HernaŁndez-Vergara 2001).
ratio for acceptable growth under controlled culture
conditions, whereas a 100/60 g kg  1 ratio produces
Experimental diets
low growth (Carmona-Osalde, Olvera-Novoa, &
Rodr|¤ guez-Serna 2005). HernaŁndez-Vergara et al. The cray¢sh P. acanthophorus has the ability to digest
(2001) indicated that redclaw cray¢sh Cherax quadri- vegetal source protein in arti¢cial diets (Cervantes-
carinatus larvae and juveniles require between 250 Santiago, HernaŁndez-Vergara & Pe¤rez Rostro 2007);
and 350, and 40 and 80 g kg  1 lipid. A similar pro- for this reason, in the experimental diets, a 75/25
tein requirement was reported by Corte¤s-Jacinto, soy meal/ ¢sh meal ratio as was used the protein
Villarreal-Colmenares, Civera-Cerecedo and Mart|¤ - source, as well as ¢sh and corn oil at a 1:1ratio, wheat
nez-Cordova (2003) for optimum growth in C. quadri- bran, corn starch, vitamins and minerals, soy le-
carinatus (342 g kg  1), but they recommend a cithin, pigment and carboxymethylcellulose as a bin-
310 g kg  1 dietary protein level for juveniles (1g). der (Table 1).
The variations in the protein and lipid requirement Diets were formulated using a spreadsheet (EXCEL,
data are associated with the material source, quality Microsoft) based on the protein, lipid, vitamin, miner-
and inclusion levels, as well as the presence of other al and energy requierements of cray¢sh (HernaŁndez-
energy sources in diet formulations (D’Abramo 1989); Vergara 2001). The dry ingredients were ground to
for this reason, it is important to conduct some trials 0.250 mm, and then mixed for 15^20 min in a mixer

r 2010 The Authors


2 Journal Compilation r 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 1^10
Table 1 Formulation and proximate composition of experimental diets containing di¡erent protein/lipid ratios fed Procambarus acanthophorus

r 2010 The Authors


Diets
1
Ingredients (g kg ) 200/60 200/80 200/100 200/120 250/60 250/80 250/100 200/120 300/60 300/80 300/100 300/120 350/60 350/80 350/100 350/120 400/60 400/80 400/100 400/120

Fish meal 77.1 77.1 77.1 77.1 96.3 96.3 96.3 96.3 115.6 115.6 115.6 115.6 134.8 134.8 134.8 134.8 154.1 154.1 154.1 154.1
Soya mealw 327.9 327.9 327.9 327.9 409.8 409.8 409.8 409.8 491.8 491.8 491.8 491.8 573.8 573.8 573.8 573.8 667 681 695.1 702.6
Wheat branz 58.1 58.1 58.1 58.1 72.6 72.6 72.6 72.6 87.2 87.2 87.2 87.2 101.7 101.7 101.7 101.7 88.3 53.5 18.6 0.0
Fish oil‰ 22.3 32.3 42.3 52.3 20.4 30.4 40.4 50.4 18.4 28.4 38.4 48.4 16.5 26.5 36.5 46.5 14.6 24.6 34.6 44.6
Corn oilz 20.8 30.8 40.8 50.8 18.6 28.6 38.6 48.6 16.3 26.3 36.3 46.3 14 24 34 44 12.4 23.3 34.2 44.7
Corn starch 431.3 411.3 391.3 371.3 319.8 299.8 279.8 259.8 208.3 188.3 168.3 148.3 96.7 76.7 56.7 36.7 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.0
Vitamin and mineral 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
premixk
Carboxymethylcellulose 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0
Soya lecithin 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Pigment 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Vitamin C7 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Proximate composition (g kg  1 dry base)
Moisture 63.1 54.9 63.6 59.4 66.2 61.3 59.4 52.3 92.5 82.4 82.9 79.1 62.7 57.4 75.5 53.7 66.5 75.2 67.4 56.1
Crude protein 217.6 219.6 220.0 227.7 276.9 271.9 271.2 268.2 317.9 316.9 315.4 319.4 377.2 373.0 376.5 381.5 434.4 424.5 425.9 420.9

Journal Compilation r 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 1^10


Ether extract 68.3 95 116.9 134.8 67.5 91.1 114.7 136 62.6 81.4 98.4 112.8 63.4 84.1 110.7 135.1 62.3 86.4 104.9 126.1
Ash 42.3 46.0 44.8 45.9 56.4 55.3 54.8 54.6 65.5 63.9 64.5 64.6 74.1 77.3 74.5 77.3 83.5 83.5 82.1 99.4
Crude fiber 10.7 11.9 11.0 12.3 10.8 16.1 20.4 20.9 25.8 22.9 21.0 20.1 29.3 31.6 34.1 40.8 34.8 36.5 30.4 28.2
NFE 598.0 572.6 543.7 519.9 522.2 504.3 479.5 468.0 435.7 432.5 417.8 404.0 393.3 376.6 328.7 311.6 318.5 293.9 289.3 269.3
Energy (MJ 100 g  1) 18.92 18.83 20.01 17.24 18.42 18.67 18.75 17.24 18.29 18.25 18.46 19.00 18.54 18.92 19.17 18.83 18.08 18.04 17.58 18.46

Fish meal: protein 65.08%; lipids 8.85%, ash 12.5%; moisture 7.6%; and ¢ber 0.2%. Source: El Pedregal Silver Cup balanced feeds.
wSoya meal: protein 42.70%; lipids 2.18%; ash 7.58%; moisture 7.57%; ¢ber 38.32%. Source: (SERCA) Servicios Cient|¤ ¢cos Agropecuarios.
zWheat bran: protein 17.2%; lipid 3.46%; ash 5.40%; moisture 10.81%; ¢bre 41.87%.
‰Shark liver oil.
zCorn oil, Mazola.
kVitamin and mineral premix (Laboratorios Brovel, Me¤xico): Vitamin A 200 000 UI; Vitamin B1 220 mg; Vitamin B2 30 mg; nicotinamide 400 mg; pantothenic acid 100 mg; Vitamin B6 0.5 mg; Vitamin B12;
Vitamin C 120 mg; Vitamin D3 15000 UI; Vitamin E 100 UI; Folic acid 3 mg; calcium 1500 mg; cobalt 3 mg; phosphorous 1150 mg; iron 150 mg; magnesium 200 mg; potassium 25 mg; manganese 25 mg;
selenium 0.1mg; sodium 3000 mg; zinc 400 mg. Vit C (Sigma, Me¤xico).

3
Aquaculture Research, 2010, 1^10 Protein lipid ratio for growth and survival of juvenile cray¢sh E Cervantes-Santiago et al.
Protein lipid ratio for growth and survival of juvenile cray¢sh E Cervantes-Santiago et al. Aquaculture Research, 2010, 1^10

(Crypto JC32 Peerles Rota bowl mixer, Crypto, Lon- Percent weight gain
don, UK); the oils and soy lecithin were also added
and mixed for a further 15 min. The carboxymethyl- WGð%Þ ¼ 100½ðWf =Ni Þ=Wi 
cellulose was pre-gelatinized separately in warm
(60 1C) water and mixed into the mixture until a whereWf is the individual ¢nal weight and Wi is the
homogeneous mass was formed (HernaŁndez-Vergara initial individual weight. Daily weight gain
et al. 2003). The mixture was passed through a 2-mm- (mg day  1), DWG 5 sIWG week days  1. The speci¢c
diameter meat grinder (Moulinex HV8, DKA1, growth rate was estimated as
France) to form pellets, which were dried in a forced- WGð%Þ ¼ 100½ðWf  Wi Þ=Wi 
air oven (RIOS ROCHA S.A., Mexico) at 60 1C for 12 h
until the moisture content was o100 g kg  1. Dried per days, and the feed conversion ratio as FCR 5 IFI/
pellets were stored at  4 1C in zipper plastic bags WG based on the individual feed intake (IFI) (dry
until use. Diets were analysed for proximate compo- matter basis) and total weight gain in all juveniles
sition in the beginning of the experiment following (WG) (wet weight).
standard methods (AOAC 1990). Crude protein
(g Kg  1) and energy content were determined using
an elemental analyzer (CN Flash EA Thermo Quest, Water quality
Basingstoke Haunt, UK). Water quality in the experimental system was moni-
tored twice a day (9:00 and 18:00 hours) during the
trial period. Temperature ( 1C) was measured using a
s
digital thermometer (Lifegard Temp AlertTM, Life-
Experimental procedure gard Aquatic Digital Temp Alert, WI, USA), dissolved
Cray¢sh were fed once daily (15:00 hours). At the be- oxygen (DO) using a YSI556 MPS (Yellow Spring In-
ginning of the trial, feeding rates were 20% of the to- strument, OH, USA) and water hardness (CaCO3
tal biomass and were gradually adjusted downward mg L  1), pH, total ammonium (NH4), N-nitrite
during the ¢rst 2 weeks to 5% of the biomass at the (NO2) and N-nitrate (NO3) using a rapid colorimeter
end of the study (Cervantes-Santiago 2008). At the kit (Hagen, Nutra¢n, Mans¢eld, USA).
beginning and the end of the experiment, the cray-
¢sh were individually measured from the tip of the
Statistical analysis
rostrum to the telson using a vernier, and weighed
in an electronic scale balance (OHAUS, Scout Pro, Results were analysed using a multifactor explora-
CS200, NJ, USA; 0.01g) by placing them beforehand tory analysis to identify the factor with the maxi-
on an absorbent towel to remove excess water, and mum e¡ect on the response parameters. A mixed
then counted. Additionally, every 2 weeks, the juve- multivariate ANOVA (95% con¢dence interval) was ap-
niles in each experimental unit were counted and plied to identify the di¡erences between treatments
their individual wet body weights were determined (protein, lipid) and a possible interaction (pro-
for growth and survival calculations, feeding adjust- tein  lipid). Because there were no di¡erences in
ment and e⁄ciency estimations. On the second day of the lipid content and an interaction was not ob-
the experiment, all organisms died after the initial served, factors were combined in a variable P/L ratio
measurements were replaced with an equal-size ju- as shown in Table 2. A surface response model
venile, with no further replacements made there- and generalized linear models were applied from
after. quadratic regression models: yi 5 a1b1X11b2X221ei.
Diet quality and nutritional e⁄ciency were evalu- The survivance data were arcsine transformed be-
ated in terms of survival, feed e⁄ciency and weight fore statistical analyses. All statistical analyses were
gain by applying standard models (HernaŁndez-Ver- performed using the STATISTICA version 7.0 software.
gara, Olvera-Novoa & Rouse 2004). Percent survival
was expressed as
Results
Sð%Þ ¼ 100ðNf =Ni Þ
Water quality parameters (average  SD) were within
where Nf is the ¢nal number of organisms per treat- the ranges recommended for cray¢sh growth and survi-
ment and Ni is the initial number of organisms. val: temperature: 24.7  1.0 1C; DO: 5.80  0.29

r 2010 The Authors


4 Journal Compilation r 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 1^10
Aquaculture Research, 2010, 1^10 Protein lipid ratio for growth and survival of juvenile cray¢sh E Cervantes-Santiago et al.

Table 2 Results of the mixed multivariate ANOVA for nutritional trial in Procambarusacanthophorus fed experimental diets

Survival Final Weight SGR IWG IFI


Factor (%) weight (g) gain (%) (%.day  1) (g day  1) (g day  1) FCR PER

Protein P 5 0.961735 P 5 0.000000 P 5 0.000000 P 5 0.000000 P 5 0.000000 P 5 0.000001 P 5 0.360972 P 5 0.000000


Lipid P 5 0.444496 P 5 0.666190 P 5 0.666190 P 5 0.648131 P 5 0.666190 P 5 0.102146 P 5 0.728465 P 5 0.428748
Proteinlipids P 5 0.333173 P 5 0.101207 P 5 0.101207 P 5 0.090823 P 5 0.101207 P 5 0.608254 P 5 0.916980 P 5 0.927956

Protein and lipids levels and the interaction protein  lipids (P  0.05).
SGR, speci¢c growth rate; IFI, indicidual feed intake; IWG, individual weigh gain; FCR, food convertion rate; PER, protein e⁄ciency rate.

Table 3 Means of proximate composition (dry matter) of the female and male Procambarus acanthophorus fed with experi-
mental diets containing di¡erent protein/lipid ratios

Females Males

Moisture Protein Lipid Calories Moisture Protein Lipid Calories


P/L (g kg  1) (%) (%) (%) (MJ100 g  1) (%) (%) (%) (MJ100 g  1)

200/60 72.2 11.0 3.5 17.99 75.6 9.8 2.5 16.07


200/80 70.7 16.9 4.2 19.29 73.1 10.9 3.1 17.24
200/100 72.4 10.9 4.3 18.49 73.9 10.5 3.1 17.33
200/120 72.5 14.4 3.9 19.66 74.0 11.5 3.2 18.17
250/60 74.1 11.6 3.1 18.20 74.1 11.9 2.1 17.12
250/80 71.9 12.7 3.5 18.33 72.7 13.8 2.3 18.54
250/100 71.6 13.3 3.2 19.37 73.7 12.8 2.4 18.42
250/120 74.2 12.1 3.5 19.37 72.8 11.9 2.6 15.15
300/60 73.1 13.5 2.5 18.33 74.3 12.2 1.7 18.29
300/80 72.1 12.8 3.0 18.33 74.5 12.7 1.8 17.08
300/100 74.1 11.5 3.0 17.91 76.4 12.1 2.1 17.66
300/120 74.9 13.0 2.9 17.74 75.3 11.8 2.2 17.29
350/60 73.2 12.7 1.9 18.16 77.4 13.2 1.6 19.55
350/80 73.6 13.7 2.9 15.69 74.8 13.0 2.0 17.75
350/100 73.9 15.1 3.3 19.71 76.6 12.6 2.0 16.32
350/120 73.8 12.6 3.6 20.21 75.8 12.2 2.3 17.33
400/60 73.9 11.4 2.1 16.32 76.7 14.2 1.4 16.99
400/80 74.3 10.7 2.3 16.48 75.3 11.7 1.7 16.83
400/100 74.2 11.7 2.7 16.78 77.2 11.4 1.6 16.53
400/120 75.3 12.0 2.3 16.86 78.5 11.4 1.5 16.90

mg L  1; ammonium: 0.06  0.05 mg L  1; N-nitrite: the reproductive behaviour has some e¡ect on the
0.10  0.0 mg L  1; N-nitrate: 5  0.0 mg L  1; pH: growth, and carcass body composition by sex, a prox-
8.67  0.13; and total hardness: 358  103.05 mg L  1 imate composition analysis was performed. The car-
CaCO3. cass body analysis showed no di¡erences by sex or
The nutritional trial was stopped after 84 experi- treatment, although lipid (%) and body caloric en-
mental days because reproductive behaviour was ob- ergy (MJ 100 g  1) contents in females were slightly
served in di¡erent units. The mixed multivariate higher than the males for all treatments, without sig-
analysis of variance to determine whether there were ni¢cant di¡erences; for this reason, the results were
di¡erences between treatments, and a possible inter- analysed as a group (Table 3).
action between factors (protein and lipids), only The cray¢sh survival ranged from 66% to 86%,
showed the e¡ect of the protein (Po0.05) in all vari- without di¡erences between treatments. Because of
ables, except for survival and FCR, with no e¡ect of the lowest survival recorded in the juvenile fed with
lipids, or an interaction between the two factors the 250/12 g kg  1 diet, although this treatment
(Table 2). yielded the most e⁄cient parameters (WG, SGR and
In the treatments 200/120, 250/60 and 400/120 DWG), a correlation analysis was performed between
ovigerous females were found. To determine whether weight gain and survival to determine a possible

r 2010 The Authors


Journal Compilation r 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 1^10 5
Protein lipid ratio for growth and survival of juvenile cray¢sh E Cervantes-Santiago et al. Aquaculture Research, 2010, 1^10

Table 4 Comparation of means between treatments for the di¡erent traits evaluated in Procambarus. acanthophorus fed ex-
perimental diets containing di¡erent protein/lipid ratios

Ratio
Weight SGR IWG Feed Intake
P L Survival (%) Gain (%) (% day  1) (mg day  1) (mg day  1) FCR PER

200 60 82.22 16 448abc 2.64abc 27.41abc 33.45ab 1.23 3.52ab


200 80 68.89 17 686abc 2.68ab 29.48abc 33.55ab 1.15 3.79a
200 100 73.33 15 924abc 2.62abc 26.54abc 31.25ab 1.20 3.61ac
200 120 75.56 17 233abc 2.66abc 28.72abc 33.85ab 1.17 3.54ad
250 60 73.33 19 186ab 2.72ab 31.98ab 36.28ab 1.14 2.97abe
250 80 77.78 20 543ab 2.75ab 34.24ab 33.91ab 1.00 3.47ab
250 100 86.67 19 995ab 2.74ab 33.33ab 33.65ab 1.01 3.48ab
250 120 66.67 21 995a 2.79a 36.66a 39.95a 1.10 3.32ab
300 60 71.11 18 829ab 2.71ab 31.38ab 39.58a 1.28 2.27bde
300 80 77.78 16 067abc 2.62abc 26.78abc 31.25ab 1.21 2.50abe
300 100 71.11 21 376a 2.77a 35.63a 35.35ab 0.99 2.93abe
300 120 73.33 19 186ab 2.72ab 31.98ab 36.43ab 1.16 2.71abe
350 60 77.78 18 495ab 2.70ab 30.83ab 34.70ab 1.13 2.22be
350 80 82.22 16 471abc 2.64abc 27.45abc 29.03ab 1.06 2.41bcde
350 100 71.11 15 567abc 2.61abc 25.94abc 28.97ab 1.12 2.21be
350 120 71.11 18 710ab 2.71ab 31.18ab 33.23ab 1.07 2.33bcde
400 60 68.89 14 186bc 2.56bc 23.64bc 25.61b 1.10 1.98e
400 80 80.00 14 233bc 2.57bc 23.72bc 27.66ab 1.16 1.87e
400 100 80.00 11 662c 2.46c 19.44c 23.08b 1.22 1.84e
400 120 73.33 11 733c 2.47c 19.56c 22.95b 1.17 1.94e

Values with the same letter superscript in the same column are not statistically di¡erent (P  0.05).
SGR, speci¢c growth rate; IWG, individual weigh gain; FCR, food convertion rate; PER, protein e⁄ciency rate.

in£uence of mortality on growth. The weight gain^


survival ratio was not signi¢cant (r2 50.037;
P 5 0.1365), indicating that cray¢sh growth was only
a¡ected in the experimental diets.
The cray¢sh fed with 250,300 and 350 g kg  1 pro-
tein levels showed signi¢cantly better growth than
the organisms fed with the 200 and 400 g kg  1 pro-
tein treatments without any relation to the lipid con-
tent. The lipid levels for all diets had no signi¢cant
e¡ect on cray¢sh growth (Table 4).
Better WG (%), SGR (% day  1) and DWG
(mg day  1) were observed in cray¢sh fed with the
250/120 and 300/100 diets, with no statistical
di¡erence between them, with the being signi¢-
cantly higher (Po0.05) than those with 400/60,
400/80, 400/100 and 400/120 levels. Feed intake of
the experimental cray¢sh in the di¡erent treat-
ments was proportional to biomass increase and Figure 1 Response surface model of the e¡ects of dietary
nutrient assimilation e⁄ciency. Cray¢sh fed with protein and lipid levels on weight gain in Procambarus
the diets 250/120 and 300/60 had signi¢cantly acanthophorus.
higher (Po0.05) IFI values than the 400/60, 400/
100 and 400/120 treatments. No di¡erences were The e¡ect of P/L levels in the cray¢sh weight gain
observed between treatments for cray¢sh FCR, (%) was evaluated using the response surface model.
with the highest e⁄ciency (0.99) in the organisms Data showed a protein level between 200 and
of 300/100 and the lowest (1.28) with the 300/60 300 g kg  1 for the best cray¢sh growth, without an
treatment. e¡ect of the lipid ratio (Fig. 1).

r 2010 The Authors


6 Journal Compilation r 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 1^10
Aquaculture Research, 2010, 1^10 Protein lipid ratio for growth and survival of juvenile cray¢sh E Cervantes-Santiago et al.

26000
WG (%) = –14864.28+251.14x –0.45x2; 0.95 Conf. Int.
24000 r2 = 0.5428; r2 adjusted = 0.5267

22000

20000

Weight gain (%)


18000

16000

14000

12000

10000

8000
180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420
Dietary protein levels (g Kg–1)

Figure 2 Relationship between weight gain and dietary protein level for optimum growth (Xmax) and a lower protein
level (X0) for Procambarus acanthophorus.

The equation for the response surface model was males with the same age. Results were associated
WGð%Þ ¼ 17013:33 þ 277:41x  53:48y with storage of lipid reserves for egg development or
vitellogenesis for all treatments (4%, 8% and 12%
 0:45x2  0:29xy þ 0:81y2 lipid ratio). In the present study, a similar carcass
when composition and growth could be associated with
the age of the cray¢sh. Our observations in the la-
x ¼ Protein level in the diet ðg kg1 Þ and
boratory with the species suggest a reproductive be-
y ¼ Lipid level in the diet ðg kg1 Þ haviour 2 or 3 weeks before the beginning of gonadic
The optimal dietary protein level for the maximum development, a period when females begin to store
growth of P. acanthophorus was 279 g kg  1; these more energy for vitellogenensis. In the 200/120,
data were determined graphically based on the WG 250/60 and 400/120 treatments, ovigerous females
(%) results, using a second-order quadratic regres- were found, but the eggs did not complete their devel-
sion analysis. The 95% con¢dence limits help to de- opment, probably because the females did not have
termine the dietary protein level (between 211 and enough energy store in the eggs.
232 g kg  1) that is able to minimize feed costs with- The survival average in the present trial (66^86%)
out a¡ecting growth (Fig. 2). was similar to previous results under laboratory con-
ditions for P. acanthophorus (Cervantes-Santiago et al.
2007), which could be because the species has a sig-
ni¢cantly less aggressive and territorial behaviour
Discussion
than other cray¢sh. In agreement with these data,
The present reseach combined di¡erent levels of pro- Cruz-Ordonez (2009) indicated no aggressive beha-
tein and lipid to determine the e¡ects on growth, sur- viour in P. acanthophorus did not increase at a density
vival and carcass composition. The carcas body as high as 100 org m  2, without signi¢cantly di¡er-
composition in males and females cray¢sh fed the ex- ences in growth and survival rates. Related data were
perimental diets in the present study was similar, observed by Carmona-Osalde et al. (2005) in P. llamasi
without any e¡ect related to the experimental diets mantained under controlled conditions (87^100%
(P/L ratio). In contrast, HernaŁndez-Vergara et al. survival). In contrast, Webster, Goodgame-Tiu, Tid-
(2003) found a di¡erence between sexes in the lipid well and Rouse (1994) obtained 50^71% survival
metabolic routes in pre-adults C. quadricarinatus, rates for juvenile C. quadricarinatus, when the mortal-
where females had a higher carcas lipid level than ity rate was associated with cannibalism. Jones, De

r 2010 The Authors


Journal Compilation r 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 1^10 7
Protein lipid ratio for growth and survival of juvenile cray¢sh E Cervantes-Santiago et al. Aquaculture Research, 2010, 1^10

Silva and Mitchell (1996) obtained rates of 95^100% ment produces metabolic stress in the organism be-
for ‘Common yabby Cherax destructor Austin, 1996’ cause it expends extra energy in eliminating excess
and 100% for ‘White yabby C. albidus Austin, 1996’ nutrients, thus reducing the feed e⁄ciency and
when individual contained were used in the experi- growth rate. The dietary protein requirement
mental period. found in this research for P. acanthophorus is similar
The lipid ratio tested in the present research (60, to previous reports for other cray¢sh. Jover et al.
80, 100 and 120 g kg  1) had no signi¢cant e¡ect on (1999) reported a minimum protein requirement
the survival, growth or feed e⁄ciency in P. acantho- of 220 g kg  1 for P. clarkii, and recommended a range
phorus, as apparently all energy and essential fatty of 220^260 g kg  1; lower levels decreased the
acid requirements were being met through the lipid growth rates. Ackefors et al. (1992) suggested that
source (1:1 animal/vegetal source). The result sug- commercial diets for A. astacus must contain 300^
gested a speci¢c essential fatty acid requirement, 350 g kg  1 protein, 200^250 g kg  1 carbohydrates
more than the dietary lipid level. Similar data were re- and no more than 100 g kg  1 lipid. For ‘Signal cray-
ported by Davis and Robinson (1986), who estimated ¢sh Pacifastacus leniusculus, Dana, 1852’, Celada, Car-
the dietary lipid requirement level of the White cray- ral, Gaudioso,Temino and FernaŁndez (1989) reported
¢sh P. acutus acutus with no di¡erences in growth a protein requirement between 270 and 330 g kg  1
with a dietary lipid level between 0 and 120 g kg  1; for good growth, which could be improved by supple-
for this, 40 g kg  1 was suggested for diet formula- menting with fresh aquatic plants. Webster et al.
tion. Other authors recommended a lipid level be- (1994) indicated that a 330 g kg  1 protein level is
tween 40 and 120 g kg  1, and no more than adequate for recently enclosed C. quadricarinatus lar-
120 g kg  1 in crustacean diets (D’Abramo, Wright, vae. This agrees with the 330 g kg  1 protein reported
Wright, Bordner & Conklin 1985; New 1987; Corte¤s- as producing the most e⁄cient growth in C. quadri-
Jacinto, Villarreal-Colmenares, Cruz-SuaŁrez, Civera- carinatus juveniles (weight 41g) when compared
Cerecedo, Nolasco-Soria & HernaŁndez-Llamas 2005). with lower levels (Keefe & Rouse 1999). HernaŁndez-
Diets must also be supplemented with 0.5% Vergara et al. (2001) reported protein requirements
cholesterol to promote e⁄cient lipid metabolism ranging from 300 to 350 g kg  1 and a lipid require-
(HernaŁndez-Vergara, Olvera-Novoa & Rouse 2004). ment of 40^80 g kg  1 for good growth rates in larvae
The best growth and survival in A. astacus are ob- and juveniles of C. quadricarinatus. In most cases, the
tained with dietary lipid levels between 55 and protein requirement for some cray¢sh species is
100 g kg  1, with a lower survival rate with a high le- higher than those found for P. acanthophorus; this
vel (160 g kg  1) (Ackefors, Castell, Boston, Rty & could be related to the trophic place of cray¢sh in
Svensson 1992). In intensive and semi-intensive cul- the environment, when detritivore species are at the
tures of C. quadricarinatus, practical diets can contain bottom of the trophic chain with a very low metabolic
42 g kg  1 lipids without adverse e¡ects on the requirement, and consequently the low protein re-
growth, when the natural production of a nutrient quirement observed here is not unexpected.
supplement occurs in the culture tanks (HernaŁndez- The present results indicate that under controlled
Vergara et al. 2003). conditions, the cray¢sh P. acanthophorus requires a
The results of the present research suggested a diet containing 279 g kg  1 protein and 60 g kg  1
dietary protein requirement of P. (A.) acanthophorus lipid for optimum growth, with a protein proportion
between 232 and 279 g kg  1 (minimum 211), with a of 75/25% vegetal/animal source. The low protein
60 g kg  1 lipid ratio. These results suggested good requirement and e⁄cient feed conversion rate of
nutritional e⁄ciency capacity of the species for use P. acanthophorus make it a very promising species for
as energy in the diets from di¡erent sources (P/L). aquaculture. Feed costs can be minimized without
The 250/120 (P/L) treatment provided the best a¡ecting the growth performance with a protein le-
growth and nutritional e⁄ciency, but the data sug- vel as low as 211^232 g kg  1.
gest that it is possible to use di¡erent P/L ratios
without a¡ecting the growth, to improve the feed
costs. Protein levels below 250 g kg  1 and above
Acknowledgements
400 g kg  1 yielded lower growth rates, probably due
to the cray¢sh-speci¢c protein requirement, in which This research was supported by ITBOCA, and the
low levels cover basal metabolic requirements but do Mexican Science and Thechnology Council (CONA-
not allow for growth, while a level above the require- CYT) with a Master’s in Science sholarship 201573.

r 2010 The Authors


8 Journal Compilation r 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 1^10
Aquaculture Research, 2010, 1^10 Protein lipid ratio for growth and survival of juvenile cray¢sh E Cervantes-Santiago et al.

References Tesis de Maestr|¤ a en Ciencias en Acuacultura, Instituto


Tecnolo¤gico de Boca del Rio,Veracruz Me¤xico,70pp.
Ackefors H., Castell J.D., Boston L.D., Rty P. & Svensson M.
D’Abramo L.R. (1989) Lipid requirements of shrimp. Ad-
(1992) Standard experimental diets crustacean nutrition
vances in tropical aquaculture. Aqua cop, Ifremer. Actes
research. II. Growth and survival of juvenile cray¢sh de Colloque 9, 271^185.
Astacus astacus (Linne¤) fed diets containing various D’Abramo L.R. & Sheen S.S. (1994) Nutritional requirements,
amounts of protein, carbohydrate and lipid. Aquaculture feed formulation, and feeding practices for intensive cul-
104, 341^356. ture of the fresh water prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii.
AŁlvarez-Torres P., Soto F., Avile¤s-Quevedo S., D|¤ az-Luna C. & Review Fisheries Science 21, 1^21.
Trevino-Carrillo M. (1998) Panorama de la Investigacio¤n y D’Abramo L.R., Wright J., Wright K.H., Bordner C.E. & Con-
su repercusio¤n sobre la produccio¤n acu|¤ cola en Me¤xico. In: klin D.E. (1985) Sterol requirement of cultured juvenile
Avances en Nutricio¤n Acu|¤ cola III (ed. by L.E. Cruz Suarez, cray¢sh, Pacifastacus leniusculus. Aquaculture 49, 245^
D. Ricque Marie & R. Mendoza), pp. 3–21 Memorias 255.
del Tercer Simposium Internacional de Nutrición Davis D.A. & Robinson H.E. (1986) Estimation of the dietary
Acuı́cola, Monterrey Monterrey, Universidad Autóno- lipid requirement level of the White cray¢sh Procambarus
ma de Nuevo León, Nuevo León, México. acutus acutus. Journal ofWorld Aquactic Society 17, 37^43.
A.O.A.C. (1990) O⁄cial methods of analysis. In: O⁄cial DOF. (2006). Carta Nacional Pesquera. Diario O¢cial de la Fed-
Methods of Analysis of the Association of O⁄cial Analytical eracio¤n. 25 de agosto de 2006. http://www.inp.sagarpa.
Chemists,15th Edition (OMA) (ed. by William Horwitzm & gob.mx/Docs/Carta%20Nacional%20Pesquera%202005/
George Latimer Jr.). AOAC International,Washington, DC, Docs/Sagd08252.pdf
USA.1141pp. Fowler J.F., Lorio W. & Lutz G. (1994) Cray¢sh, damage pre-
Carmona-Osalde C., Olvera-Novoa M.A. & Rodr|¤ guez-Serna vention and control methods. In: Prevention and Control
M. (2005) E¡ect of the protein^lipids ratio on growth and of Wildlife Damage. E.U.A. (ed. by S.E. Hygnstrom,
maduration of the cray¢sh Procambarus (Austrocambarus) R.M. Timm & G.E. Larson), pp. 616–617. University
llamasi. Aquaculture 250, 692^699. of Nebraska Cooperative Extension, Institute of Agri-
Celada J.D., Carral J.M., GaudiosoV.R.,Temino C. & FernaŁndez culture and Natural Resources, Lincoln, NE, USA.
R. (1989) Response of juvenile freshwater cray¢sh (Paci- Galvao R. & Bueno S.L.S. (2000) Population structure and re-
fastacus lenisculus Dana) to several fresh and arti¢cially productive biology of the Camacuto shrimp, Atya scabra (Dec-
compounded diets. Aquaculture 76, 67^78. apod, Caridea, Atyidae), from Sao Sebastiao, Brazil. In: J. C.
Cervantes-Santiago E. (2008) Relacio¤n prote|¤ na-l|¤ pidos y von Vaupel-Klein & F. R. Sccharm (Eds.), Proceedings of
fuentes alternas de prote|¤ na en dietas para el aprovechamiento the Fourth International Crustacean Congress, Amster-
sustentable del acocil Procambarus (austrocambarus) dam. - The Biodiversity and Crustacean. Crustacean Issues
acanthophorus. Tesis de Maestr|¤ a en Ciencias, Instituto 12, 291^299.
Tecnolo¤gico de Boca del R|¤ o, 93pp. Guillaume J. (1997) Protein and amino acids. In: Crustacean
Cervantes-Santiago E., HernaŁndez-Vergara M.P. & Pe¤rez Nutrition, Vol. 6 (ed. by L.R. D’Abramo, D.E. Conklin &
Rostro C.I. (2007) Sustitucio¤n de harina de pescado por D.M. Akiyama), pp. 26^50. World Aquaculture Society.
harina de soya en dietas para crecimiento y supervivencia Advances inWorld Aquaculture Society.
del acocil Procambarus (Austrocambarus) acanthophorus, HernaŁndez-Vergara M.P. (2001) Contribucio¤n al conocimiento
en condiciones de laboratorio. In: Impulso Tecnolo¤gico (ed. de los requerimientos nutricionales de la langosta australiana
by F. Lango-Reynoso & M.R. Castaneda-ChaŁvez), pp. 107^ Cherax quadricarinatus, Tesis PhD. Centro de Investiga-
114. Memorias del Symposium Internacional Aquamar, ciones y Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N. Me¤rida, YucataŁn,
Veracruz, Me¤xico. Edicio¤n especial. Me¤xico,104pp.
Corte¤s-Jacinto E.,Villarreal-Colmenares H., Civera-Cerecedo HernaŁndez-Vergara M.P., Rouse D.B. & Olvera-Novoa M.A.
& Mart|¤ nez-Cordova R. (2003) E¡ect of dietary protein le- (2001) E¡ect of dietary protein^lipid ratios on survival
vel on growth and survival of juvenile freshwater cray¢sh and growth of Australian cray¢sh (Cherax quadricarina-
Cherax quadricarinatus (Decapoda: Parastacidae). Aqua- tus) hatchlings and juveniles. Freshwater Cray¢sh 13,
culture Nutrition 9, 207^213. 97^106.
Corte¤s-Jacinto E., Villarreal-Colmenares H., Cruz-SuaŁrez HernaŁndez-Vergara M.P., Rouse D.B., Olvera-Novoa M.A. &
L.E., Civera-Cerecedo R., Nolasco-Soria H. & HernaŁndez- Davis D.A. (2003) E¡ects of dietary lipid level and source
Llamas A. (2005) E¡ect of di¡erent dietary protein and li- on growth and proximate composition of juvenile red
pid levels on growth and survival of juvenile Australian claw (Cherax quadricarinatus) reared under semi-intensive
redclaw cray¢sh, Cherax quadricarinatus (von Martens). culture conditions. Aquaculture 223, 107^115.
Aquaculture Nutrition 11, 283^291. HernaŁndez-Vergara M.P., Olvera-Novoa M.A. & Rouse D.B.
Cruz-Ordonez S.B. (2009) Cultivo piloto del acocil Procam- (2004) E¡ect of dietary cholesterol on growth and survi-
barus (Astrocambarus) acanthophorus en bicultivo con la ti- val of juvenile redclaw cray¢sh Cherax quadricarinatus
lapia Oreochromis niloticus en un sistema de recirculacio¤n. under laboratory conditions. Aquaculture 236, 405^411.

r 2010 The Authors


Journal Compilation r 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 1^10 9
Protein lipid ratio for growth and survival of juvenile cray¢sh E Cervantes-Santiago et al. Aquaculture Research, 2010, 1^10

Jones P.L., De Silva S.S. & Mitchell D.B. (1996) E¡ect of dietary in aquaculture, Report No. ADCP/REP/87/26. FAO, Rome,
protein content on growth performance, feed utilization pp. 23^45.
and carcass composition in the Australian freshwater Rodr|¤ guez-Serna M., Carmona-Osalde C., Olvera-Novoa
cray¢sh, Cherax albidus Clark and Cherax destructor Clark M.A. & Arredondo-Figueroa J.L. (2000) Fecundity, egg
(Decapoda, Parastacidae). Aquaculture Nutrition 2, 141^ development and growth of juvenile cray¢sh Procam-
150. barus (Austrocambarus) llamasi (Villalobos, 1955)
Jover M., FernaŁndez-Carmona J., Del R|¤ o M.C. & Soler M. under laboratory conditions. Aquaculture Research 31,
(1999) E¡ect of feeding cooked-extruded diets, containing 173^179.
di¡erent levels of protein, lipid and carbohydrate on Thompson K.R., Muzinic L.A., Engler L.S., Morton S. & Web-
growth of red swamp cray¢sh (Procambarus clarkii). Aqua- ster C.D. (2004) E¡ects of feeding practical diets contain-
culture 178,127^137. ing various protein levels on growth, survival, body
Keefe A. & Rouse D. (1999) Protein requirements for juvenile composition, and processing traits of Australian red claw
Australian red claw cray¢sh, Cherax quadricarinatus. cray¢sh Cherax quadricarinatus, and on pond water qual-
Freshwater Cray¢sh 12, 471^477. ity. Aquaculture Research 35, 659^668.
Lovell T. (1989) Nutrition and Feeding of Fish. An Avi Book. Webster C.D., Goodgame-Tiu L.S., Tidwell J.H. & Rouse D.B.
Published by Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA. (1994) Evaluation of practical feed formulations with dif-
260pp. ferent protein levels for juvenile red claw cray¢sh (Cherax
New M.B. (1987) Feed and feeding of ¢sh and shrimp. A manual quadricarinatus). Transactions of KentuckyAcademy Science
on the preparation of compound feed for shrimp and ¢sh 55,108^112.

r 2010 The Authors


10 Journal Compilation r 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 1^10

You might also like