After a rather long hiatus, Snapdeal is in the news again. Is the PR about a
turnaround true - has Snapdeal really turned the corner or is there more to
this than meets the eye?Snapdea
(Once (and fature?) unicorn
“There was atime not that fog ago when Snapdel ys the proverbial
poste boy of not just Indian e-commerce but of Indian startups in gene
“The pioneer in the e-commere marketplace mode, Snapeal trated
nearly 82 ilo n funding fom blue-chip investors sch as SoRBank,
‘ay, Bessemer, Nexis and Ontario Pension Fund was destined for gest
things, beyond the token startup unicorn ag,
Butin the aftermath ofits failed shotgun marriage o Flip, Snapdeal
Seemingly el off the mapa forgotten startup relic that had no relevance or
‘meaning ina new word dominated by the Walmart/ipkart:
‘Amon dopo
ati no
una Bat
comeback i,
Startup hero
leading media house recently anointed the Soapdea founders, Kunal Bal
td Rohit Banal as comeback kids in thee startup awards shown
award tha purportedly recognised the tenacity of Snapdeal to emerge as
“one ofthe bigest survival stores ofthe Indian startup ecosystems in
The soure of this optimism?
‘Acompany blog ost by Kona Bahl where be elamedthat"in the recent
oneluded financial yar, FY 2018-19, Sapdeal grew its consolidated
revenues 72% YoY, while simltancously reducing loss by 70% YoY and
revenue from operations for Snape (standalone) grew by 8795 Yor"
Revenue 225 v- Loss
reo 7 cate
on.
ae o N
= | >
a
° ° ° °
Fy2017418 FY 2018-49 Fy2017-18 FY 2018-19
‘Bab so daimed that “over the lst wo ears, we have reduced our lass by
amineredible 968" and that SnapdealDeeame the st agescalee
commerce company in nda to achieve the cash-proit milestone by cash
breakeven inthe month of Jne 2048 In anoher post, Bab claimed tata
July 2018, the ompany ut down on “ash bur by 00% and made the
highest-ever net even in its history in Oetober 208°
While these averments might be suicent to convince erdulous media
people ooking toissue big-hang headlines and doe oat startup awards, the
prof ofthe padding is ot in accepting these statements at face value but in
taking Took at the company's ane statements to see the
numbers dlp,
Sapa ing show tht the operating evens ofthe company did seeslglicant up of 84%, fom Re 455 ror ($64 millon) wo Rs 89 core
($185 millon),
But that’s where the good news ends.
‘While the revenue numbers themsches have some curios dsrepancies, 8
farmore important takes that contrary tothe company’s claims of
edaing operating loses by 70%, thee, nat, a 92% YoY nerease in
eto losses. far ery rom the "urnaroun”nareatie being pede
Inthe pres.
ows this possible?
\Weloome to Snape’ Astosreophag Sass.
You are what you eat
Before you reach fora dictionary “autosarophagy"is the term used fo self
cannibaism~the practice of eating ones
ow does thisplay ont inthe case of Sapdeal?
{In Jly 2017, the proposed merger between Saspdea and Fphart was
lly called off The ofl ines that Ba and Bansal aed off the
merger because they wanted to stay independent by choice. However there
have always been whispers tat thease through primarily Because
Fiphart wanted the Sapa! founders to sgn ndemniistion agreement,
{hereby aking esponsibility forsl previous busines decisions and
lesings Something that Bahl and Bansal were loath odo.
‘eta t may, this esson tcl off the merger was on tha linated
‘th Snapdeal founders fom thee investors, most of whom wanted the del
to go through. So while the decison tostay independent as Snapdeal 2.0
ve Bahl and Bansal a chance to continue running the company, the had
to do so without expecting any farther suppor from their investor.
Alege bur rte couple wth sallow funding treasure chest made fora