Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com/baseliv
Basel IV
Revisions to the
securitisation framework
We give you an overview of
the latest Basel proposals.
Contents
Preface................................................................................................................ 5
Foreword............................................................................................................... 6
Motivation and Context......................................................................................... 9
Our Services........................................................................................................ 25
Preface
The major weaknesses identified within the existing securitisation regime were a
mechanistic reliance on external ratings when determining capital requirements,
insufficient risk-sensitivity due to the negligence of certain risk drivers and the
existence of cliff-effects with pro-cyclical impact. So the goal was to enhance risk
sensitivity, recalibrate risks in a more prudent way, improve consistency with the
underlying credit risk framework and enhance simplicity. All adjustments made in
the final framework, including the criteria for simple, transparent and comparable
securitisations can be mapped to these goals.
PwC is constantly developing solution sets, tools and supporting material to inform
and prepare our clients on the upcoming regulatory changes.
This brochure is designed to provide you with an overview of the individual topics
in the context of Basel IV. For further information on single topics, separate
documents have been prepared and will be updated regularly.
Kind regards,
The Committee also incorporated the criteria for “Simple, Transparent and Comparable” (STC) securitisations
and their capital treatment into the revised framework. Compliance with the expanded set of STC criteria
provides additional confidence in the performance of the transactions and a reduction in the capital charges for
such securitisations is suggested.
Capital Counter
Securiti Market Operational Interest Other
require- Credit risk party CVA risk
sation risk risk rate risk topics
ments credit risk
IRBA (BCBS 305) (BCBS 291) (BCBS 325) (BCBS 319) Step-in risk
(BCBS 306) (BCBS 362) (BCBS 303) (BCBS 279) (BCBS 352) (BCBS 355) (BCBS 362) (BCBS 368) (BCBS 349)
Objectives Improvements
RW 1250%
𝐾𝐾𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 − 𝐴𝐴 𝐷𝐷 − 𝐾𝐾𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼
𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 = ∙ 12,5 + ∙ 12,5 ∙ 𝐾𝐾𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆(𝐾𝐾𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 )
𝐷𝐷 − 𝐴𝐴 𝐷𝐷 − 𝐴𝐴
𝑥𝑥 = 0.5 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠
𝑝𝑝 = max[0,3; (A + B ∙ 1/𝑁𝑁 + C ∙ 𝐾𝐾𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 + D ∙ 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 + E ∙ 𝑀𝑀𝑇𝑇 ) ∗ x]
𝑥𝑥 = 1 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 − 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠
𝐾𝐾𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆(𝐾𝐾𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 ) = (e𝑎𝑎∙𝑢𝑢 − 𝑒𝑒 𝑎𝑎∙𝑙𝑙 )/𝑎𝑎(𝑢𝑢 − 𝑙𝑙) A, B, C, D, E: Technical Parameters for calibration of p(dependent on granularity of portfolio)
1 ≤ MT ≤ 5
RWTranche= RWTranche MT 1 / MT 5 after adjusment of maturities >1 and <5 years through linear interpolation
u = 𝐷𝐷 − KA
KA ≤ A < KA < D ≤ KA
a = −(1/(p ∙ KA))
RW = KSSFA(KA) ∙ 12,5 RW = 1,250 % l = max(𝐴𝐴 − KA; 0)
𝑊𝑊 = 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
𝐾𝐾𝐴𝐴 − 𝐴𝐴 𝐷𝐷 − 𝐾𝐾A
𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 = ∙ 12,5 + ∙ 12,5 ∙ 𝐾𝐾𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆(𝐾𝐾𝐴𝐴 )
𝐷𝐷 − 𝐴𝐴 𝐷𝐷 − 𝐴𝐴
𝐾𝐾𝐴𝐴 = 1 − 𝑊𝑊 ∙ 𝐾𝐾𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 + 𝑊𝑊 ∙ 0,5 A, B, C, D, E: Technical Parameters for calibration of p(dependent on granularity of portfolio)
1
Completion of securitization Help all parties to a securitization in evaluating ist risks &
framework by adding specific own returns by comparing different products within an asset class
funds requirements for STC
securitisations Foster simplicity by setting incentives to use
STC Criteria
The supervisory
Theparameter
supervisory p depends
parameter on factor
p depends onxfactor
fixedx at 0,5is fixed at 0,5
which
1
𝑝𝑝 = max[0,3; (𝐴𝐴 + 𝐵𝐵 ∗ + 𝐶𝐶 ∗ 𝐾𝐾𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 + 𝐷𝐷 ∗ 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 + 𝐸𝐸 ∗ 𝑀𝑀𝑇𝑇 ) ∗ 𝐱𝐱]
𝑁𝑁
SEC-External
SEC-External Ratings Based
Ratings Approach
Based Approach
10% floor for risk weights for senior exposures and in general lower risk weights
compared to the consultation phase
10% floor for risk weights for senior exposures and in general lower risk weights compared to
consultation phase
SEC-Standardised Approach
SEC-Standardised
The supervisory parameter p fixed at 0.5 Approach
Conclusion
✓
Significant increase of risk weights Incentives for STC securitisations Increased data requirements
and capital requirements through through preferential capital compared to the current
the establishment of the new treatment. Yet, new risk weights approaches
approaches are still higher compared to those
under CRR
✓ • P wC has developed an Access-based tool to calculate capital requirements using the current and the new
approaches also for STC securitisations
• Test calculations for SEC-IRBA, SEC-ERBA, SEC-SA and EU propositions
• Integration of graphical results in the project documentation and presentation
• Extensive practical trials of the tool in various preliminary studies
PwC’s Global Basel IV Initiative was established to support you in all aspects
of getting compliant with the new regulatory requirements to the securitisation
framework.
CEE
Jock Nunan
Tel: +381 113302-120
jock.nunan@rs.pwc.com
Denmark France
Janus Mens Marie-Hélène Sartorius
Tel: +45 3945-9555 Tel: +33 1 56575-646
janus.mens@dk.pwc.com marie-helene.sartorius@fr.pwc.com
www.pwc.com