Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Article
Research on Gear Shifting Process without Disengaging Clutch
for a Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicle Equipped with AMT
Received 31 October 2013; Revised 13 December 2013; Accepted 13 December 2013; Published 11 February 2014
Copyright © 2014 Hui-Long Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Dynamic models of a single-shaft parallel hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) equipped with automated mechanical transmission (AMT)
were described in different working stages during a gear shifting process without disengaging clutch. Parameters affecting the gear
shifting time, components life, and gear shifting jerk in different transient states during a gear shifting process were deeply analyzed.
The mathematical models considering the detailed synchronizer working process which can explain the gear shifting failure, long
time gear shifting, and frequent synchronizer failure phenomenon in HEV were derived. Dynamic coordinated control strategy
of the engine, motor, and actuators in different transient states considering the detailed working stages of synchronizer in a gear
shifting process of a HEV is for the first time innovatively proposed according to the state of art references. Bench test and real road
test results show that the proposed control strategy can improve the gear shifting quality in all its evaluation indexes significantly.
detailed stages: A unload of the power sources before a 3. Evaluation Indexes of Gear Shifting Quality
gearshift, B switch to neutral gear, C active speed synchro-
nization by the motor, D mechanical speed synchronization 3.1. The Gear Shifting Time. The gear shifting time of the
by the synchronizer, E selection and engagement the new single-shaft parallel hybrid electric vehicle includes the
gears and F torque recovery. unload time 𝑡unload , time of disengaging the gear 𝑡diseng ,
The control in stage A is mainly aimed at reducing the time of active synchronization 𝑡PMSM , time of mechanical
transmitted torque between the engaged gears close to zero, synchronization and gear engaging 𝑡eng , and time of torque
which means that the power sources are not output driving recovery 𝑡recv . The gear shifting time will affect the dynamics
torque and at the meantime are not driven by the output shaft. and comfort performance of the HEV.
Several problems will come out when trying to disengage the
gears transmitting large torque as follows. 𝑡shift = 𝑡unload + 𝑡diseng + 𝑡PMSM + 𝑡eng + 𝑡recv . (1)
(a) It is difficult to disengage the gears or damage the
teeth surface of the gears due to the contact pressure 3.2. The Friction Work. The friction work can reflect the wear
between the meshing teeth. of the friction pair; it is an important index of durability. The
(b) It introduces torsional vibration of the output shaft smaller the friction work is the longer the life of synchronizer
and affects the comfort of the vehicle due to the step can be obtained.
change of torque. The friction work 𝐿 is given as
(c) It increases the difficulty of active synchronization
due to the introduced vibration of output shaft speed.
𝑡𝑠
𝜔𝑖
𝐿 = ∫ 𝑇𝑠 𝜔𝑜 − 𝑑𝑡, (2)
0 𝑖𝑔
A gearshift when incompletely unloaded is shown in
Figure 3. The main control difficulty in stage A is that
there is no sensor to measure the transmission torque where 𝑡𝑠 is the friction time, 𝑇𝑠 is the friction torque, 𝜔𝑖 , 𝜔𝑜 are
between the meshing teeth, so it is easy to unload the power the angular speed of input part and output part of the friction
sources incompletely or excessively and introduce reverse pairs, respectively [12].
torque exerted to the input shaft. This phenomenon becomes
more frequent when the driver needs a snap acceleration 3.3. The Gear Shifting Jerk. The jerk is derivative of longitudi-
or a quick slowdown; it seriously affects the gear shifting nal acceleration; it can reflect the oscillation of driving torque
quality. and can be expressed as
Stag C is the active speed synchronization period; it
needs to adjust the speed of the input shaft to a desired speed
𝑑2 V 𝑟 𝑑2 𝜔𝑜
quickly without overshoot and oscillation; the response of 𝑗= = , (3)
active speed synchronization driven by the PMSM is much 𝑑𝑡2 𝑖0 𝑑𝑡2
faster than that driven by engine [11].
In real driving cycles, stages D and E which were con- where 𝑡 is time, V is the vehicle speed, 𝑖0 is the gear ratio of the
duct at the same time were also crucial to obtain a high quality main retarder, and 𝑟 is the radius of the driving wheel.
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 3
New gear
Initial gear
Gear
Motor speed
Speed
Engine speed
Desired speed
Engine torque
Motor torque
Torque
1 2 3 4 5 6 Time
Driver control Driver control
Gear shifting
To calculate the jerk equation (3) can be discretized as When the system is in a certain gear, the differential equa-
tions are
𝑇𝑟
(𝑇𝑒 + 𝑇𝑚 − 𝑇𝑒𝑚 − 𝑇𝑓 ) 𝑖𝑔 − 𝑇𝑜𝑤 −
𝑟 (𝜔𝑛+2 − 𝜔𝑛+1 ) − (𝜔𝑛+1 − 𝜔𝑛 ) 𝑖𝑜
𝑗 (𝑛) = (5)
𝑖0 Δ𝑡2
(4) = (𝐽𝑒 𝜔̇ 𝑒 + 𝐽𝑚+𝑐 𝜔̇ 𝑚 + 𝐽𝑖 𝜔̇ 𝑖 ) 𝑖𝑔 + 𝐽𝑜 𝜔̇ 𝑜 + 𝐽𝑤 𝜔̇ 𝑤 .
2𝜋𝑟 (𝑛𝑛+2 − 𝑛𝑛+1 ) − (𝑛𝑛+1 − 𝑛𝑛 ) When the system is in neutral gear, the differential equa-
= ,
60𝑖0 Δ𝑡2 tions are
𝑇𝑒 + 𝑇𝑚 − 𝑇𝑒𝑚 − 𝑇𝑓 = 𝐽𝑒 𝜔̇ 𝑒 + 𝐽𝑚+𝑐 𝜔̇ 𝑚 + 𝐽𝑖 𝜔̇ 𝑖 ,
where 𝑛 is the angular speed of the output shaft. The ride 𝑇𝑟 (6)
comfort of the vehicle becomes worse than the increase of the −𝑇𝑜𝑤 − = 𝐽𝑜 𝜔̇ 𝑜 + 𝐽𝑤 𝜔̇ 𝑤 .
𝑖𝑜
jerk. For the quantitative criteria of jerk, the recommended
value of Germany is |𝑗| ≤ 10 m/s3 , the one of former Soviet When the system transforms from neutral gear to a cer-
union is: |𝑗| ≤ 31.36 m/s3 , and the one of China is |𝑗| ≤ tain gear, the differential equations are
17.64 m/s3 [13].
𝑇𝑠
𝑇𝑒 + 𝑇𝑚 − 𝑇𝑒𝑚 − 𝑇𝑓 − = 𝐽𝑒 𝜔̇ 𝑒 + 𝐽𝑚+𝑐 𝜔̇ 𝑚 + 𝐽𝑖 𝜔̇ 𝑖 ,
𝑖𝑔
(7)
4. Power Transmission System Modeling 𝑇
𝑇𝑠 − 𝑇𝑜V − 𝑟 = 𝐽𝑜 𝜔̇ 𝑜 + 𝐽𝑤 𝜔̇ 𝑤 ,
The sketch of power transmission system for the researched 𝑖𝑜
single-shaft parallel hybrid electric vehicle is shown in where
Figure 4. It should be able to find out the main factors
affecting the gear shifting quality in stages A, D, and E. 𝑇𝑒𝑚 = 𝑘𝑒𝑚 (𝜃𝑒 − 𝜃𝑚 ) + 𝑐 (𝜔𝑒 − 𝜔𝑚 ) ,
The rotational inertia of clutch is equaled to the permanent
magnet synchronous motor due to the fact that there is no 𝑇𝑜V = 𝑘𝑜V (𝜃𝑜 − 𝜃V ) + 𝑐 (𝜔𝑜 − 𝜔V ) ,
clutch disengaging in the gear shifting process. To analyze
the torsional vibration of shafts between the driving motor 𝜃𝑥̇ = 𝜔𝑥 , 𝑥 = (𝑒, 𝑚, 𝑜, V) , (8)
and engine, the torsion between gearbox and final drive
𝑇𝑟 𝐶 𝐴V2
is taken into account. The torsion inside the gearbox is = 𝐺 (𝑓road cos 𝜃 + sin 𝜃) + 𝐷 𝑎 ,
ignored. 𝑟𝑤 21.15
4 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
4
800
3
2 600
T (Nm)
1 400
0 200
−1
184.0 184.2 184.4 184.6 184.8 185.0 0
100
Time, t (s) 80 3000
Th 60 2500
Current gear rot 40 2000
tle 1500
(% 20 1000 pm)
) N (r
600
Figure 5: Engine MAP.
540
480
420 the final drive ratio, 𝜔𝑒 is the engine speed, 𝜔𝑚 is the motor
360 speed, 𝜔𝑖 is the transmission input shaft speed, 𝜔𝑜 is the
transmission output shaft speed, 𝜃𝑒 is the engine rotation
300
184.0 184.2 184.4 184.6 184.8 185.0 angle, 𝜃𝑚 is the motor rotation angle, 𝜃𝑜 is the rotation
Time, t (s)
angle of transmission output shaft, 𝜃V is the rotation angle
of final drive, 𝐺 is the vehicle gravity, 𝑓road is the rolling
Displacement of gearshift actuator resistance coefficient, 𝜃 is the road slope angle, 𝐶𝐷 is the air
resistance coefficient, 𝐴 is the face area (m2 ), V𝑎 is the relative
velocity (km/h), which represents wind-free velocity, 𝐽𝑖 is the
1120 equivalent rotational inertia of first-speed gear and second-
speed gear in transmission which is converted to the input
1080
139 rpm end of synchronizer, 𝐽𝑒+𝑐 is the equivalent rotational inertia
1040 of engine crankshaft and clutch pressure plate, and 𝐽𝑚+𝑐 is
the equivalent rotational inertia of motor and driven part of
1000 clutch.
960
184.0 184.2 184.4 184.6 184.8 185.0
Time, t (s)
5. Components Modeling
Speed of output shaft There are two working states of the transmission, in a certain
gear or in neutral gear. When it is in neutral gear, 𝑇𝑠 = 0.
Figure 3: A gearshift when incompletely unloaded. This paper focuses on the research of the switching process
between states 1 and 2. It involves the dynamic process of each
component.
Je , 𝜔e Jm + c , 𝜔m Ji , 𝜔i Jo, 𝜔o Jw , 𝜔w
Tm Ts
Te Tow
Tem Tr 5.1. Engine Modeling. The engine torque 𝑇𝑒 can be obtained
kem kow from the engine MAP as follows:
cem cow
300
60𝜔mech
20 𝑛= . (14)
2𝜋
10 The axial force acting on shift sleeve 𝐹𝑥 can be represented
as
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
𝐹𝑥 = 𝑇eg 𝑖𝑚 𝜂𝑚 , (15)
N (rpm)
Figure 6: Motor MAP. where 𝑖𝑎 , 𝑖𝑏 , 𝑖𝑐 are phase currents, 𝑢𝑎 , 𝑢𝑏 , 𝑢𝑐 are phase voltages,
𝑅𝑠 is the phase resistance of stator, 𝑒𝑎 , 𝑒𝑏 , 𝑒𝑐 are phase
potential, 𝐿 𝑠 is the self-inductance of stator phase, 𝐿 𝑚 is the
mutual-inductor of stator phases, 𝑇𝐿 is the load torque of
the power battery discharges and recharges 𝑇𝑏,dis and 𝑇𝑏,chg , motor, 𝐵 is the damping coefficient, 𝜔mech is the angular speed
the motor torque can be represented as of rotor, 𝐽 is the rotational inertia of motor, 𝑖𝑚 is the speed
ratio between motor and sleeve operating mechanism, and
𝜂𝑚 is the mechanical efficiency between motor and sleeve
max (𝑇𝑚,req , 𝑇𝑚,dis , 𝑇𝑏,dis ) when 𝑇𝑚,req > 0, operating mechanism.
𝑇𝑚 = {
max (𝑇𝑚,req , 𝑇𝑚,chg , 𝑇𝑏,chg ) when 𝑇𝑚,req < 0.
(10) 5.4. Synchronizer Modeling. Synchronizer is one of the most
important parts of transmission. The working process of
synchronizer directly affects the gear shifting quality [14].
The motor MAP is shown in Figure 6. To derive the optimal coordinated control strategy of each
part, the operating process of synchronizer is divided into five
stages.
5.3. Gear Shifting Actuator Modeling. The gear shifting actu-
ator is driven by brushless DC motor (BLDCM). In a gear
5.4.1. First Free Fly. This stage actually includes two pro-
shifting process, parameters including the displacement of
cesses. First, the sleeve moves forward axially without resis-
actuator and gear shifting force should be under control. The
tance and pushes the synchro ring to the target gear. The
displacement should be tuned to a certain position rapidly
resistance axial force is very small in this stage. Second, the
and accurately. The output force of the BLDCM also should
force transfers from sleeve to the sliders, then to the cone
be accurately controlled.
surfaces of synchro ring. The spring of slider here is used to
The mathematical model and torque characteristics of
keep the balance. When the force transferred increases to a
BLDCM can be analyzed with the mode of 3-phase 6-state.
certain extent, the limiting mechanism will lose its balance.
At any moment, only two phases work and the remaining
So the sliders are pushed into grooves of the synchro hub
one shuts down. The motor adopts Y connection with non-
by the radial pressure, and the sleeve can continue sliding
salient pole. Based on the physical structure, we assume that
forward. Then the spline teeth of sleeve is contacted to the
the three phases of stator are completely symmetrical, the air-
spline teeth of synchro ring, and the axial force transfers from
gap magnetic field produced by rotor is square wave, the back
sleeve to the synchro ring. The schematic diagram of this stage
electromotive force of 3-phase winding is trapezoidal wave,
is shown as Figure 7.
the armature reaction of stator winding and eddy current loss
The kinetic equation is
are ignored, and the magnetic circuit is not saturated. So the
balance equation of the 3-phase stator voltage is given as 𝐹𝑥 − 𝐹𝑓 − 𝐹𝑟 = 𝑚𝑠 𝑎𝑠̇ , (16)
where 𝑚𝑠 is the mass of sleeve, 𝑎𝑠̇ is the acceleration of sleeve,
𝑑𝑖𝑘 𝐹𝑓 is the sliding resistance when sleeve moves, and 𝐹𝑟 is the
𝑢𝑘 =𝑅𝑠 𝑖𝑘 + 𝑒𝑘 + (𝐿 𝑠 − 𝐿 𝑚 ) , 𝑘 = 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐. (11)
𝑑𝑡 force acted on sleeve from limiting mechanism.
Leaving out the mechanical loss of rotor and assuming 5.4.2. Angular Velocity Synchronization. The sleeve stops
the electromagnetic power can totally translate to the kinetic sliding, and its axial velocity becomes zero. The friction
energy of rotor, the electromagnetic torque of motor is between mesh teeth of sleeve and mesh teeth of synchro ring
starts to increase while the kinetic energy of sleeve and the
target gear begin to decrease. The angular velocity difference
(𝑒𝑎 𝑖𝑎 + 𝑒𝑏 𝑖𝑏 + 𝑒𝑐 𝑖𝑐 ) between them decreases gradually to zero. The schematic
𝑇eg = . (12)
𝜔mech diagram of this stage is shown in Figure 8.
6 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Spring
Mesh tooth
of sleeve
Synchro hub
Limiting mechanism
Mesh tooth of
synchro ring disappears. The schematic diagram of this stage is shown in
Figure 9.
Ft Before the turning one has
𝜔𝑟0 = 𝜔𝑜 . (19)
Fa
During the turning process one has
Mesh tooth
of sleeve 1 − 𝜇 tan 𝛽
𝐹𝑥 𝑟 − 𝑇loss − 𝑇𝑖 𝑖𝑔 − 𝑇𝑓 = 𝐽𝑟 𝜔̇ 𝑟 , (20)
𝜇 + tan 𝛽 𝑠
𝐽𝑟 = 𝐽𝑒+𝑐 + 𝐽𝑚+𝑐 + 𝐽𝑖 , (21)
𝑇𝑖 = 𝑇𝑒 + 𝑇𝑚 − 𝑇𝑓 − 𝑇𝑒𝑚 . (27)
𝑇𝑖 = 𝑓 (𝛼𝑒 , 𝑇𝑚 , 𝜔𝑖 ) . (28)
equation is similar to the first stage. The schematic diagram
of this stage is shown in Figure 11. Consider Another problem is the coordinated torque control of the
two power sources during the unloading phase. The control
parameters during the unloading phase involved the engine
𝐹𝑥 − 𝐹𝑓 − 𝐹𝑟 = 𝑚𝑠 𝑎𝑠̇ , throttle opening 𝛼𝑒 and motor torque 𝑇𝑚 . Firstly, the torque 𝑇𝑖
should be adjusted linearly instead of step change. Secondly,
(25) the gear shifting time should be as short as possible. Finally,
𝜇𝑔 𝑇𝑖 𝑖𝑔
𝐹𝑓 = , the input torque 𝑇𝑖 should be controlled close to zero.
𝑟𝑠 The engine throttle opening is controlled linearly to zero
without step change. The step change might cause the shaft
torsional vibration between the engine and the driving motor;
where 𝜇𝑔 is the axial dynamic friction coefficient between it also might influence the driving motor.
sleeve and spline teeth of constant mesh gear and 𝑇𝑖 is Bench test showed that if the unloading time of the
the transferred torque. We can get the conclusion from the engine is 0.8 s when the initial throttle opening is 100%,
derived kinetic equations that in the gear shifting process the shaft torsional vibration between the engine and motor
without disengaging clutch for a parallel hybrid vehicle can be negligible. When the hybrid power system starts to
equipped with AMT, the inertia of input shaft, the speed unload linearly from the maximum torque 1200 Nm and the
control precision of driving motor, and the input torque unload speed is 15 Nm/10 ms, the shaft torsional vibration of
of transmission can directly affect the synchronization time the transmission system can be negligible as well. So 0.8s
and friction work. The control of shifting force is also very is the maximum unloading time. The PMSM can respond
important. An ideal control of each component in each stage much faster than engine; it can be controlled to compensate
can improve the quality of gear shifting and increase the life the resistance torque and adjust the input torque 𝑇𝑖 to zero
of synchronizer. linearly during the process of the engine unloading.
8 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
PMSM and gear shifting force. The basic principle is shown Start to unlock the
in Figure 13. synchro ring
(4) Turning the Target Gear. This stage is almost the same as
the last one except that the synchro ring is unlocked. The Y
actual wriggled components are still in the sleeve side; the Unlock?
control algorithm can be learned from the previous stage.
N
(5) Final Free Fly. In this stage, the gear shift actuator is
controlled to the desired position and the engaging process Desired motor speed
is finished. +10 rpm for 200 ms
8. Conclusions Y
Start
Shift
schedule
N
Gearshift?
Y
Unload
control
Figure 16: The test bench.
N
|Ti | < 10
Y
Disengage the
gears
Active
synchronization
N
|ReqNm − Nm| < 10
Y
Engage the
new gears Figure 17: The test HEV.
Y
Engage?
process and active unlock control of the synchronizer on a
N HEV are proposed.
N By the dynamic coordinated control of the engine, motor
|ReqNm − Nm| < 10 and actuators in unloading process, the net input torque
of the gearbox can be controlled more closely to zero, and
Y
it is easy to disengage the gears smoothly and quickly. By
Synchro ring the dynamic coordinated control of the engine, motor, and
N unlock control actuators in every working stage of the synchronizer during
a gear shifting process, the gears can be controlled to engage
more quickly and successfully with less friction.
Engage?
According to the statistical data of the evaluation indexes
Y in Table 2, the whole gear shifting time is controlled within
1.5 s. And the time consuming for stage 1 (disengaging the
Torque recovery gears) and stage 2 (recovering the torque) takes about 50%
control
of the whole gear shifting time, which is determined by the
gearshift points and the driver’s demand of torque. The power
Gearshift fnish interrupt time is controlled within 0.5 s and the dynamic
property of the HEV is ensured. The jerk of gear shifting
Figure 15: Gear shifting control algorithm for a single-shaft parallel without disengaging clutch is controlled within 15 m/s3 and
HEW without disengaging clutch. the ride comfort of the HEV is ensured.
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 11
80 800
Tm (Nm)
Te (%)
60 600
40 400
20 200
0 0
62.0 62.5 63.0 63.5 64.0 61.0 61.2 61.4 61.6 61.8 62.0
t (s) t (s)
80 500
Tm-Req (Nm)
Te-Req (%)
60 400
40 300
20 200
100
0 0
62.0 62.5 63.0 63.5 64.0 61.0 61.2 61.4 61.6 61.8 62.0
t (s) t (s)
200
Tm (Nm)
0 30
Te (%)
−200 20
−400 10
−600 0
62.0 62.5 63.0 63.5 64.0 61.0 61.2 61.4 61.6 61.8 62.0
t (s) t (s)
Tm-Req (Nm)
200 40
Te-Req (%)
30
100 20
10
0 0
62.0 62.5 63.0 63.5 64.0
61.0 61.2 61.4 61.6 61.8 62.0
t (s)
t (s)
6
6
Gear
4
4
Gear
2 2
0 0
62.0 62.5 63.0 63.5 64.0
61.0 61.2 61.4 61.6 61.8 62.0
t (s)
t (s)
1800
n2 (rpm)
60
Te −d (%)
1500 40
1200 1 2 3 4
20
0
62.0 62.5 63.0 63.5 64.0 61.0 61.2 61.4 61.6 61.8 62.0
t (s) t (s)
1800
n1 (rpm)
Tm−d (Nm)
400
1500
1200 200
References
Conflict of Interests
[1] M. Pettersson and L. Nielsen, “Gear shifting by engine control,”
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 8, no. 3,
regarding the publication of this paper. pp. 495–507, 2000.
12 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
International
Journal of Journal of
Mathematics and
Mathematical
Discrete Mathematics
Sciences