‘THE PUBLIC DOMAIN
WHAT IS
PU
BLIC?
THE CASE FOR A
“RICH CO
T
MMON”
Alongside the UK publication of his provocative book, Common
as Air, Lewis Hyde takes a look at Golan v Holder, a copyright
case recently decided by the US Supreme Court.(On January 18 of this year the US Supreme
Court decided a copyright exte, Golan v Holder,
in which the key question was whether Congress
ie ever allowed to ‘restore’ copyrights for works
that, for one reason or another, have fallen into
the public domain, ‘The court decided that yes
indeed, Congress may do 40. Nothing in the US
Constitution, neither the Copyright Clause nor
the
First Amendment, they ruled, "makes the
www.worldipreview.com
public domain, in any and all case, 2 territory
that works may never exif.
In October 2011, just before this case was argued,
1 sought to frame the historical rationale by
which the opposite opinion might be argued. 1
here reproduce a version of that argument and
follow i wth a comment on
he courts contrary
Intellectual Property Re
THE PUBLIC DOMAIN
In 1948, Twentieth-Century Fox released
fone of the Cold Wark first anti-communist
films, tron Curtain, the soundtrack of which
featured music by Russlan composer Daiti
Shostakovich, Shostskovich himself probably
never saw the fim, soit was presumably under
‘orders from Stains regime that his name soon
appeared on a copyright infringement suit filed
in the US. Had the suit succeeded it would have
effectively prevented. moviegoers
from seeing Iron Curtain. Bo
in America
{didnot succeed
Shostakovich music then lay in our public
domain and, once there, ts rights holders had no
say in hve itcould be used
The public domain is @ valuable guarantor of
both fee tade and fee expression, which is
why there was much at stake in the Galan case
the plaintifs inthis litigation were challenging
hat has allowed foreiga authors
ic copyrights, removing from the
public domain hundreds
21994 law
Lawyers call thie ‘Copyright restoration’ but it
might better be called ‘