Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2nd Order Transfer Function PDF
2nd Order Transfer Function PDF
ωn2 ωn2
H(ω) = = ejΦ
ωn2 – w2 + 2ζωnw
√ (ωn2 – ω2)2 + 4 ζ2 ωn2 ω2
2ζωn ω
with tanΦ = –
ω n2 – ω 2
The Bode plot is :–
H, dB
1
For ζ = √2 we have the sharpest
10
corner without a maximum. ζ= 0.1
0
1 ζ=2
For ζ < √2 there is a peak in the plot of -10
magnitude ζ= 1
1 -20 √2
|H|max = …5
2ζ √
1–ζ2 -30
Impulse Responses
y(t) 2π/ωn
ζ = 0 Undamped 1/ωn
-1/ωn
Step responses
y(t)
ζ = 0 Undamped 2
t
2 4 6 8 10
y(t)
ζ > 0 Damped
1
1 0.8
y(t) = 1 + [ s2 exp(s1t) – s1 exp(s2t) ]
√ ζ2 – 1 0.6
0.4
0.2 t
10 15
1
y(t) = ( 1 – exp( – ωnt ) [1 + ωnt] )
t
2 4 6 8 10
Perhaps unkindly I leave derivations to the reader. The general response is: –
1 ωn2
Y = H(s) × 2 = 2 2
s s (s + 2ζ ω n s + ω n2 )
ζ = 0 Undamped
y(t)
Y = 2 – 2
1 1
10
s s +ω n
2
8 Response
6
sin(ωnt )
y=t– ω 4
n 2
y=t
t
Plot is for ωn =1; y = t – sin(t) 2 4 6 8 10
Y(t)
ζ = 1 Critically Damped 8
1 ω 2 ωn
Y = ω 2n – s + s+ω +
2 6
n s
b (s+ωn)2 4
Response
2
1 t
y = ω (ωn t – 2 + (2 + ωnt ) e–ωnt) 2 4 6 8 10
n
-2 t- 2
The plot is for ωn = 1. ωn
ζ < 0 Underdamped: ωd = ωn √
1 – ζ2 y(t)
ω
ω 2ζ 2ζ(s+ζω n ) – ωn(1–2ζ2)ωd 8
Y = ω 2n – s +
1 d
(s+ζωn)2s+ωn2(1–ζ2)
Response
n s 6
4
1 t - 2ζ
y= ω × 2 ωn
n t
ωn
ωnt –2ζ+e–ωnζt[2ζcos(ωdt)–ωd (1–2ζ2) sin( ωdt)] 2 4 6 8 10
As an example consider the mass, damper and spring acted on by a force, f(t). We had for
the displacement, y :–
m y" + c y' + k y = f
Take the Laplace transform ( with no initial values ) :–
m s2Y + c s Y + k Y = F
c k
or s2Y +
m s Y + m Y = F/m
√m and
k c
which with ωn = ζ= becomes If we redefine F ≡ F/ωn2m = F/k:–
2√
km
F ωn2
and so H(s) = Y = 2 …1
s + 2ζ ω n s + ω n2
This equation 1 is a standard form for any second order transfer function. Whatever the
physical variables it helps to turn the expression to this format early in the analysis.
Poles
Poles, s1, s2 are the values of s for which the denominator is zero.
–2ζωn ± √
4 ζ2ω n2 – 4 ω n2
s1,s2 =
2
= ωn ( – ζ ± √
ζ2 – 1 ) …3
Cases; jω
Bode Plot
ωn2
From eq. 1 H(s) = 2
s + 2ζ ω n s + ω n2
ωn2
and putting s → jω H(ω) = 2 …4a
ωn – ω2 + j 2ζωnω
ωn2
with |H(ω)| = …4c
√ (ω n2 – ω 2)2 + 4 ζ2 ω n2 ω 2
2ζωn ω
and tanΦ = – …4d
ω n2 – ω 2
ω→0 ω = ωn ω→∞
|H| 1 1 ω 2
2ζ → n2
ω
π
Φ 0 –2 –π
1
For ζ < √2 there is a peak in the | H | curve. It is easier to find the peak of |H|2 which is at
1
the same value of ω as the peak of |H|. And easier still to find the minimum of 2 whic
|H|
occurs at teh same value of ω as the peak in |H|
d 1 d
ωn4 dω 2 = dω ((ω n2 – ω 2)2 + 4 ζ2 ω n2 ω 2) = 2(ωn2 – ω2)(-2ω) + 8ζ2ωn2ω
|H|
= 4ω ( ω2 – ωn2 ( 1–2ζ2))
d 1
so dω 2 = 0 if ω = 0; or if ω = ωn√
1 – 2 ζ2
|H|
1
In the latter case |H| =
√
( 1– 1+ 2ζ2)2 + 4 ζ2( 1–2 ζ2)
1 1
= = …5
√
4 ζ2( 1–ζ2) 2ζ √
1–ζ2
Note that if ζ = 0 then the peak of | H | → ∞. This is the undamped case. Note also that the
1
peak is at a frequency close to but slightly less than ωn. There is no peak if ζ > 2 since then
the frequency is imaginary.
This is illustrated in the next figures with ωn = 1. Note that the frequency scale has been
extended in the phase plot to show the approach to the limits.
In the magnitude plot note (i) the roll of rate is 40 dB per decade.
H, dB
10
ζ= 0.1
0
ζ=2
-10
ζ= 1
-20 √2
-30
-40
-0.1 1 10
Frequency, rad s-1
Phase, Φ
degrees
0
ζ = 0.1
-45
ζ= 1
-90 √2
ζ=2
-135
-180
0.01 0.1 1 10 50
Frequency, rad s-1 ( log scale )
Impulse Responses
f(t)
Consider the Dirac impulse, δ(t), as an input.
ω 2 ω ×ω n δ(t)
ζ = 0. Y = 2 n 2 × 1 = 2n
s + ωn s + ω n2
y(t) 2π/ωn
ωn
-ωn
s1,s2 = ωn ( – ζ ± √
ζ2 – 1 ) ; s1 > s2 …3
ωn2
Thus the response is Y = (s–s )(s-s ) × 1
1 2
ωn2 1 1
s1– s2 s-s1 s–s2
= –
ωn
and y(t) = ( exp(s1t) – exp(s2t))
2√
ζ2 – 1
The response below is for ωn = 1 and ζ = 2. The coefficients of the component exponentials
is omitted in the figure. The formula is :– y = 0·289( e–0·27 t – e–3·7 t)
ωn2 ωn2
ζ=1 Y= × 1 =
(s + ωn)2 (s + ωn)2
ζ < 1 This is a bit more complicated. We need to complete squares in the denominator.
ωn2
Y = H(s) × 1 = 2
s + 2ζ ω n s + ω n2
ωn2
=
(s + ζ ωn)2 – ζ2ωn2 + ωn2
ωn2
= …6
(s + ζ ωn)2 + ωd2
with ωd = ωn √
1 – ζ2 …7
ω2 ωd
Thus Y = ωn ×
d (s + ζ ωn)2 + ωd2
ω2
so, from the tables y(t) = ωn exp(-ζωnt) sin(ωdt) …8a
d
ωn
= exp(-ζωnt) sin(ωdt) …8b
√ 1–ζ2
The response for ωn = 1 and ζ = 0·1 is below. It is an exponentially decaying sine wave.
y(t)
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
10 25 t
5 15 20
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
2π
The period of the oscillation, T = ω . The ratio of succeeding positive peaks is then: –
d
exp(-ζωnt) 2πζω
= exp ω n
2π d
exp–ζωn t + ω
d
2πζωn 2πζωn
The logarithm of this ratio is δ= ωd = ω 1–ζ2
n√
2πζ
so δ= ≈ 2πζ if ζ << 1 …9
√ 1–ζ2
ωn2 1
Y= ×s …10
s + 2ζ ω n s + ω n
2 2
Cases
ωn2 A Bs + C
ζ=0 Y= ≡ + 2
s( s2 + ω n2 ) s s + ω n2
Y = s – 2
1 s
s + ω n
2
and y(t) = ( 1 – cos(ωn t))
t
2 4 6 8 10
ζ > 1 The transfer function is factorisable and the roots are real. As before eq. 3 gives the
roots: –
s1,s2 = ωn ( – ζ ± √
ζ2 – 1 ) ; s1 > s2 …3
ωn2 1
and the response is Y = (s–s )(s-s ) × s
1 2
ω 2` A B B
We have Y = s(s–s n)(s-s ) ≡ s + s-s + s-s
1 2 1 2
1 1 s2 s1
So Y= s + s–s – s–s ) ; since s1 s2 = ωn2 ; s1 – s2 = ωn√
ζ2– 1
ω n√
ζ 2 – 1 1 2
1
and y(t) = 1 + [ s2 exp(s1t) – s1 exp(s2t) ])
ωn√
ζ 2 – 1
noting s1,s2 = ωn ( – ζ ± √
ζ2 – 1 ) ; s1 > s2
y(t)
With ωn =1 and ζ = 2 this becomes
1
y(t) = 1 + 0·077 e–3·73 t – 1·077 e–0·27 t 0.8
0.6
which is illustrated on the right. 0.4
0.2 t
10 15
ωn2 1 ωn2
ζ=1 Y= × =
(s +ωn)2 s s(s + ωn)2
A B C
≡ s + s+ω + , say
n (s+ωn)2
Thus ω n 2 ≡ Α (s + ω n)2 + Bs(s + ω n) + Cs
Put s = 0 : ω n = A ω n ∴ A =1. Put s = – ω n : ω n2 = – C ω n ∴ C = – ω n
2 2
Coeff. s2 : 0=A+B ∴ B = – A = –1
1 1 ωn
Y = s – s+ω –
n (s + ωn)2
y(t)
Thus from the Tables: 1
y(t) = 1 – exp( – ωnt ) [1 + ωnt ]
ζ < 1 The more complicated but more interesting case. From eq. 1 we have
ωn2 1
Y= 2 ×s
s + 2ζ ω n s + ω n 2
ωn2
=
s(s2 + 2ζ ω n s + ω n2 )
A Bs + C
=s + , say.
s2 + 2ζ ω n s + ω n2
1 s + 2ζωn
= s– : completing the square as in eq. 6
(s + ζ ωn)2 + ωd2
ζωn
(s + ζωn) + ω ωd
1 d
= s– : making the numerator to suit the Tables
(s + ζ ωn) + ωd2
2
with ωd = ωn √
1 – ζ2
ζω
Thus y(t) = 1 – exp( – ζωn t) cos( ωd t) + ω n sin(ωd t) …11
d
we have 2
1+ e-t
5 10 15 20
y(t)
MP
Overshoot,
OP
1
δ
Period,
T = 2π
ω t
d
Tp 10 Ts 20
Overshoot
dy ω n2
The derivative = ω exp(–ζωnt) sin(ωdt)
dt d
is remarkably simple. It is equal to the impulse response. Indeed it is generally the case that
the derivative of the step response of any linear system is the impulse response.
dy nπ nπ nT
dt = 0 when ωd t = nπ or when t = ω = = 2
d ωn√
1-ζ2
2π 2π
where the period of the oscillations is T=ω =
d ωn√
1-ζ2
nπ ζ
The value of y at these extrema is Y = 1 + exp –
1–ζ2
√
The first of these when n = 1 gives the peak of the overshoot ( often simply called the
overshoot.
πζ Overshoot, Op
ΜP = 1 + exp –
√ 1–ζ2
1
πζ 0.4
ΟP = y –1 = exp – …12a
1–ζ2
√ 0.2
occurring at 0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
π π T
TP = = ω =2 …12b Damping, ζ
ωn√
1-ζ2 d
We may be interested in the time to reach and stay within a certain 'distance' from the final
value. The deviation of the nth extremum is
nπζ nπ nπ
δ = exp – which occurs at tn = or = tnωn
√
1–ζ 2 ωn√
1 – ζ 2
√ 1 – ζ 2
nπζ
so δ = exp – = exp( – ωn ζ tn)
√ 1–ζ 2
ln(δ)
and Ts = tn = – ζω
n
Strictly tn should be an integral number of half periods but the discrepancy is usually
ignored.
4
For δ = 0·02, i.e., 2% Ts ≈ ζω
n
3
and for δ = 0·05, i.e., 5% Ts ≈ ζω
n
We may also consider an overall expression of deviation from the final value. The root
mean square seems a suitable choice.
y(t) - 1 (y-1)2
1
1
0.8
0.6
t
0.4
5 10 15 20
0.2
t
-1 5 10 15 20
The deviation and its square are illustrated above for the previously shown response. We
take then as a measure of the overall deviation as
=
√
1+4 ζ2
4ωnζ
1.4
1.2
This rather simple expression is
valid for all ζ, i.e., 0 < ζ < ∞. It has 1.0 ζ
1
a minimum value of 1 when ζ = 2 . 1 2 3 4 5
t
5 10 15
There are other measures of the error. To put emphasis on the approach to the final value on
might weight erros by muptiplying by time. The integral of this de-emphasises the initial
approach to the final value.. Thus we have
t (y - 1)2
The root of the integral of time weighted
total square erroe is
0.8
∞ 1/2 0.6
Erts = ∫ t ( y –1)2 dt
0 0.4
0.2
√
t
1 1+ 8 ζ4
= 2ω ζ 5 10 15 20
n 2
The overshoot is
1
This has a minimum of 1/4 when ζπ π
2 ωn exp – = exp – ≈ 9·8%
1 – ζ2 √ 2√2–1
√
1 1/4
ζ = 8 ≈ 0·595
ωd = ωn
√
1–ζ2 = constant. s
σ
So Constant frequency in 1
response
s
Fixed envelope
σ
y =1 – exp( – ζωn t) 1
πζ σ
OP = exp –
√ 1–ζ2
t
Note: ζ = sinθ where θ is
marked in the figure.
1.4
1.2
θ
20 40 60 90