Section 19 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act determines the rules of procedure for arbitral proceedings. It provides parties the freedom to agree on procedures, and if they do not agree, allows the arbitral tribunal to determine procedures as appropriate. The tribunal has power to determine evidence admissibility and relevance. Section 19 aims to provide procedural autonomy suitable for international arbitration, while certain provisions still restrict party autonomy. The default procedure under Section 19(3) also follows other Part I provisions and allows the tribunal discretion to address dilatory tactics. Procedures can include traditional, inquisitorial, ad-hoc, or institutional models depending on dispute nature.
Section 19 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act determines the rules of procedure for arbitral proceedings. It provides parties the freedom to agree on procedures, and if they do not agree, allows the arbitral tribunal to determine procedures as appropriate. The tribunal has power to determine evidence admissibility and relevance. Section 19 aims to provide procedural autonomy suitable for international arbitration, while certain provisions still restrict party autonomy. The default procedure under Section 19(3) also follows other Part I provisions and allows the tribunal discretion to address dilatory tactics. Procedures can include traditional, inquisitorial, ad-hoc, or institutional models depending on dispute nature.
Section 19 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act determines the rules of procedure for arbitral proceedings. It provides parties the freedom to agree on procedures, and if they do not agree, allows the arbitral tribunal to determine procedures as appropriate. The tribunal has power to determine evidence admissibility and relevance. Section 19 aims to provide procedural autonomy suitable for international arbitration, while certain provisions still restrict party autonomy. The default procedure under Section 19(3) also follows other Part I provisions and allows the tribunal discretion to address dilatory tactics. Procedures can include traditional, inquisitorial, ad-hoc, or institutional models depending on dispute nature.
Proceedings LL.B. IV Sem and BA LL.B VIII Sem Faculty of Law, BHU.
Dr. Rajnish Kumar Singh
Determination of Rules of Procedure • Section19 — 1. The arbitral tribunal shall not be bound by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) or the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872). 2. Subject to this Part, the parties are free to agree on the procedure to be followed by the arbitral tribunal in conducting its proceedings. 3. Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (2), the arbitral tribunal may, subject to this Part, conduct the proceedings in the manner it considers appropriate. 4. The power of the arbitral tribunal under sub-section (3) includes the power to determine the admissibility, relevance, materiality and weight of any evidence. • It is a two level system • Provides for procedural autonomy • Suitable for circumstances of international cases Determination of Rules of Procedure (Contd…) • Parties can make their own set of rules or can adopt rules of some institution. • Agreement can be found in ‘arbitration clause’ or in ‘the agreement to submit’ • Section 19 attracts disputants towards arbitration. • Restrictionon Party autonomy: Provisions of Part I • Section 18 • Section 23(1) – Statement of claim and defence • Section 24 (2) & (3) – Hearing and written proceedings • Section 27 – Court assistance in taking evidence • Section 30 – Settlement • Section 31 (1), (3), &(4) – Form and content of award • Section 32- Termination of proceedings • Section 33 – Correction and Interpretation of award & additional award • Procedure must be consistent with public policy of India Determination of Rules of Procedure (Contd…) • Default Procedure under Section 19 (3) is also subject to other provisions of part I, as mentioned before. • It is important that the parties must be familiar with the adopted procedure or the procedure must be acceptable to the parties. • The default procedure provides discretion to the tribunal to checkmate the dilatory and unreasonable tactics adopted by a party to retard the progress of arbitration. • There can be many choices: • Traditional or adversarial procedure • Inquisitorial procedure • Ad-hoc procedure depending on the nature of the dispute • Institutional procedure