Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OA-479/2O19
Applicant(s):
Respondent(s):
Order
2. The applicant has produced as Annexure A2, the true copy of the
minutes of the DPC (H) wherein the reason stated for supersession of the
applicant is that two FIRs were registered against the applicant and are
pending investigation.
3. In fact, the applicant has been included as Sl. No. 1 in the field of choice
for preparation of the select list as evident from Annexure A3.
4. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the registration of two
FIRs cannot be a reason to supersede the applicant and he relied upon
Note to Rule 28(b)(i) 7 of Part II KS&SSR. It is submitted that merely
because the vigilance investigation is pending that cannot be a reason for
non inclusion. So far no final report has been submitted.
Convener of the DPC (H) under Rule 28(b) (8) (a) by Annexure A4.The
learned counsel for the applicant submits that his supersession is totally
illegal and there may be a direction to convene a review DPC for taking a
decision on the review petition. It is also submitted that the applicant has
got only one year service before retirement.
The O.A is disposed of, with a direction to the first respondent to cause
disposal of Annexure A4 representation by convening a meeting of the
review DPC as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of
two months, from the date of production of the certified copy of this
order which will be produced by the applicant along with a copy of this
O.A.
vp
/True copy
APPENDIX
OA-479/2O19
APPLICANT'S ANNEXURES: