Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s10854-016-5379-3
Abstract The CeO2 nanocubes with rough surface have would result in a wide range of electrical, optical, or
been successfully synthesized by a facile hydrothermal magnetic properties and open a new domain of theoretical
technique. The reaction temperature was systematically and technological interest [1–4]. Therefore, considerable
investigated. X-ray diffractometer, scanning electron efforts have been focused on the fabrication of nanomate-
microscope, transmission electron microscope, X-ray pho- rials with various morphology structures owning to stim-
toelectron spectroscopy, Raman scattering, ultraviolet–vis- ulated by the fantastic and remarkable properties.
ible and Photoluminescence spectra, and magnetization As one of the most important rare earth oxides, CeO2
hysteresis (M–H) curves were employed to characterize the with remarkable properties due to its abundant oxygen
samples. The results showed that all the CeO2 nanocubes vacancy defects, high oxygen storage capacity and ability
owned a fluorite cubic structure and there are Ce3? ions and to uptake and release oxygen via the transformation
oxygen vacancies in surface of samples. Although the mor- between Ce3? and Ce4?, has been the subject of intense
phology had a slight difference for the samples synthesized interest and widely used in oxygen storage capacity [5],
at different temperature and the average edge length of the catalyst [6], fuel cells [7], gas sensors [8], dye removal
nanocubes increased from *150 to *250 nm, then to treatments [9], and optical properties [10] and magnetic
*350 nm with the enhancement of temperature, the cube- properties [11]. Recent advances in the morphology-con-
like morphology remained unchanged. The synthesized trolled synthesis of the nanomaterials offer new opportu-
CeO2 samples show excellent room temperature optical nities of developing novel CeO2 functional materials with
properties. The M–H curves of CeO2 nano-octahedrons desired structural properties. CeO2 with various mor-
exhibit excellent room-temperature ferromagnetism, which phologies such as nanospheres [12], nanoflowers [13],
is likely attributed to the effects of the different morphology nanoplates [14], nanoshuttles [15], nano-octahedrons [16],
of samples, Ce3? ions and oxygen vacancies. nanowires [17], nanotubes [18], nanorods [19] and other
morphologies [3, 4] has been synthesized in recent years.
Although significant progress in the synthesis approaches
1 Introduction for CeO2 with various morphologies has been achieved, the
higher synthesis cost, larger energy consumption and more
In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the complicated manufacturing procedures are usually
controlled synthesis of higher ordered inorganic crystals unavoidable. Among these methods, the hydrothermal
with specific dimensions and well-defined shapes because synthesis technique has been regarded as one of the most
of the unique shape-dependent materials properties, which effective and attractive routes, due to its own merits of high
powder reactivity, versatile shape control, and a large-scale
industrialization. As is well-known, it is difficult to syn-
& Lei Qin thesize materials with nanostructures in solution-phase,
tougao1216@126.com
especially materials with a face-centered cubic structure
1
Anhui Key Laboratory of Spintronics and Nanomaterials (for example CeO2), since there is no intrinsic driving force
Research, Suzhou University, Suzhou 234000, China to form an anisotropic morphology.
123
J Mater Sci: Mater Electron
In this paper, we reported facile, smart and low-cost spectrophotometer (Hitachi F-4500) using excitation light
hydrothermal route to synthesize CeO2 nanocubes with a of 330 nm. The M–H curves were measured at room
rough surface using CeCl37H2O as cerium source, NH4- temperature by a vibrating sample magnetometer (BHV-
HCO3 as precipitator. The morphology of CeO2 can be 55).
controlled by adjusting the reaction temperature. The CeO2
nanocubes show excellent room temperature optical and
magnetic properties. Our method is an effective approach 3 Results and discussion
to controlling CeO2 morphology and size which may be
extended to synthesis of other nanomaterials. 3.1 XRD characterization
2.2 Characterization
(111)
(220)
(311)
(200)
2000
(311)
(400)
o
X-ray diffractometer (XRD, XD-3) with Cu Ka radiation 160 C
Intensity (a.u.)
123
J Mater Sci: Mater Electron
Fig. 2 SEM images of products synthesized at a 100 °C, b 120 °C, c 160 °C for 48 h, d the products synthesized at 160 °C for 48 h doped 0 mL
ethylenediamine
Fig. 2a, one can note that the nanocubes have a loosened chemical state of the CeO2 nanocubes synthesized at
body and crude surface which is covered by wrinkles 160 °C for 48 h. The Ce 3d spectra and corresponding peak
completely. These wrinkled surfaces result in a high fitted deconvolutions are given in Fig. 3a. Eight peaks
specific surface area for the nanocubes, which would be associated with the 3d electrons of Ce correspond to four
beneficial for enhancing their physical and chemical pairs of spin–orbit doublets [20]. From Fig. 3a, it can be
properties. Increasing the reaction temperature to 120 °C, seen that six Ce 3d BE peaks, at 916.51, 908.20, 899.44,
as shown in Fig. 2b, the average edge length of the nano- 898.22, 888.29 and 882.05 eV are attributed to 3d3/2 and
cubes increased from *150 to *250 nm, while overall 3d5/2 for Ce4? final states [21], while two weak peaks at
outline of the nanocubes remained unchanged. Further- 901.24 and 883.21 eV are the present for 3d3/2 and 3d5/2 for
more, the nanocubes not have a loosened body and crude Ce3? 3d final states [22]. This result indicates that the main
surface, but a cube-like structure composed of numerous valence of cerium in the sample was ?4, and a small
small nanocubes as the building block with an average amount of Ce3? distributes around oxygen vacancies on the
edge length of about 60 nm, which orderly stack together CeO2 surfaces [23], regardless of the valence of the starting
to form a cube-like structure with many pores. When the cerium salts. Figure 3b shows The O1s spectra of the CeO2
reaction temperature is up to 160 °C, the average edge nanocubes. It can be seen that three BE peaks at binding
length of the nanocubes increased from *250 to energy 528.82, 529.81 and 531.11 eV can be attributed to
*350 nm, while the cube-like morphology and crude lattice oxygen ions in CeO2, absorbed oxygen and lattice
surface remained unchanged, as shown in Fig. 2c. When oxygen ions in Ce2O3 [24–26], respectively.
1 mL ethanediamine was added into solution and reaction
temperature was keeped at 160 °C, the spherical particles 3.4 Optical properties
with a smooth but irregular surface while the size remained
unchanged, as shown in Fig. 2d. To understand the defect induced changes in the local
structure of CeO2 nanocrystals and to characterize oxygen
3.3 Composition and chemical state vacancies, a very facile and nonvolatile technique, Raman
spectroscopy was carried out. Figure 4 shows the recorded
To further characterize the product, XPS analysis was Raman spectra of the as-obtained products under different
carried out to investigate the surface composition and hydrothermal temperature. As we have seen from Fig. 4,
123
J Mater Sci: Mater Electron
80000
(a) o
160 C
462 cm-1
o
120 C
o
100 C
5000
256 cm-1
160oC
Intensity (a.u.)
Intensity (a.u.)
120oC
100oC
Intensity (a.u.)
589 cm-1
1173 cm-1
1068 cm-1
0
500 1000 1500
-1
wavelength (cm )
0
400 800 1200
-1
920 910 900 890 880 wavelength (cm )
Binding Energy (eV)
Fig. 4 Raman spectra of CeO2 nanocubes obtained at 100, 120 and
160 °C for 48 h, respectively
(b) 4+
Ce -O
123
J Mater Sci: Mater Electron
123
J Mater Sci: Mater Electron
different excitation wavelengths (290 and 340 nm). The Table 1 The parameters of Ms, Mr and Hc for CeO2 nanocubes
two peaks at 415 and 435 nm can be found from the obtained at 100, 120 and 160 °C for 48 h, respectively
flowerlike CeO2 [40], while three emission peaks located at Temperature Ms (emu/g) Mr (emu/g) Hc (Oe)
370, 414 and 468 nm have been reported for the rod-like
100 °C 0.31 0.69 285
CeO2 [41]. The weak emission band centered on 540 and
564 nm may be induced by the oxygen vacancies in the 120 °C 0.24 0.55 249
pole-like nanostructures [2]. The investigation showed that 160 °C 0.35 0.80 295
the emission bands ranging from 400 to 500 nm for CeO2
sample are attributed to the hopping from different defect
levels to valence band, and can be partly certificated by can see that all samples exhibit a very well defined hys-
comparing the relationship of peak intensity and band gap teresis loop and the nanocubes synthesized at 160 °C have
[40, 42]. The weak emission band centered on 532 nm may a higher coercivity than that of others. The parameters of
be attributed to the oxygen vacancies in the crystal with Ms, Mr and Hc for all CeO2 cube-like samples are shown in
defect energy levels below the Ce 4f band [22]. Table 1. All the parameters decrease with the enhancement
The magnetic properties of CeO2 nanocubes were of reaction temperature, and then increase. Interestingly,
characterized by measuring the field dependence of mag- these values of Ms are larger than those previous reports in
netization at room temperature. Figure 7a shows the M– which the pure CeO2 [43, 44] and CeO2 nanoparticles were
H curves of all the CeO2 nanocubes at room temperature doped with magnetic element, such as Ni, Co and Cu
and Fig. 7b is the magnetization of the central part. As we [45–47]. From those reports, it can be concluded that
magnetic not only from doped elements, but a part of CeO2
itself becomes magnetic, although bulk CeO2 with a face-
4 centered cubic structure is paramagnetic. Firstly, according
(a)
to the results of XPS and Raman analyses, it can be con-
cluded that Ce3? and oxygen vacancy existed in the surface
Magnetization (×10-1 emu/g)
2
of CeO2 samples. When the valence of Ce changes from
?4 to ?3, the electron orbits (Ce4?–O2-–Ce3?) are no
longer symmetrical and an uncoupled spins in the Ce
0
4f orbit are generated. Therefore, the room-temperature
ferromagnetism (RTFM) might consequently arise from a
o nearest-neighbor interaction: double exchange (Ce4?–
-2 160 C
o O2-–Ce3?) [48]. Secondly, from experimental and theo-
120 C
o retical studies, oxygen vacancies were supposed to give
100 C
rise to the RTFM. In addition, Bernardi et al. [49] has
-4
-5000 0 5000 confirmed that the presence of substantial oxygen vacan-
Magnetic field (Oe) cies would lead to magnetic order. Wang et al. [50] also
believed that the FM of CeO2 samples is related to the
2
(b) concentration of Ce3? and oxygen deficiencies. From the
above, the RTFM of the CeO2 samples may be ascribed to
the effects of the different morphology of samples, Ce3?
Magnetization (×10-1 emu/g)
1
ions and oxygen vacancies.
0
4 Conclusions
-1 160 C
o In summary, we have demonstrated a facile approach to the
o
120 C synthesis of CeO2 with cube-like nanostructures only using
o
100 C simple starting materials in a hydrothermal system.
-2 Although the CeO2 nanocubes obtained at different tem-
-800 -400 0 400 800 perature have similar morphology, the higher the temper-
Magnetic field (Oe) ature, the more conducive to increase the size of
nanocubes. It was found that the nanocubes have a fluorite
Fig. 7 M–H curves of CeO2 nanocubes obtained at 100, 120 and
160 °C for 48 h, respectively and the inset figure presents the spectra cubic structure and and there are Ce3? ions and oxygen
in a suitable scale vacancies existing in surface of samples. Although the
123
J Mater Sci: Mater Electron
visible luminescence exhibits similar emission peaks, the 20. E. Paparazzo, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 105, 248 (2011)
emission intensity is diverse from each other and the 21. C.R. Li, M.Y. Cui, Q.T. Sun, W.J. Dong, Y.Y. Zheng, K. Tsu-
kamoto, B.Y. Chena, W.H. Tang, J. Alloys Compd. 504, 498
emission intensity of the samples obtained at 160 °C is (2010)
highest. The ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) absorption 22. G.F. Wang, Q.Y. Mu, T. Chen, Y.D. Wang, J. Alloys Compd.
spectra of the all CeO2 samples show the excellent ultra- 493, 202 (2010)
violet shelter ability and red-shift compared with the bulk 23. W. Gao, Z.Y. Zhang, J. Li, Y.Y. Ma, Y.Q. Qu, Nanoscale 7,
11686 (2015)
CeO2. All the nanocubes exhibit excellent behavior of 24. F.L. Liang, Y. Yu, W. Zhou, X.Y. Xu, Z.H. Zhu, J. Mater. Chem.
ferromagnetism, especially the samples obtained at 160 °C, A 3, 634 (2015)
which may be attributed to the effects of the change of 25. A. Younis, D. Chu, Y.V. Kaneti, S. Li, Nanoscale 8, 378 (2016)
morphology, Ce3? ions and oxygen vacancies. The con- 26. C. Zhang, F.M. Meng, L.N. Wang, Mater. Lett. 119, 1 (2014)
27. H. Li, A. Petz, H. Yan, J.C. Nie, S. Kunsagi-Mate, J. Phys. Chem.
trollable morphology, excellent optical properties and C 115, 1480 (2011)
RTFM should make the CeO2 nanocubes as an excellent 28. H.R. Tan, J.P.Y. Tan, C. Boothroyd, T.W. Hansen, Y.L. Foo, M.
candidate for nano particles application in related areas. It Lin, J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 242 (2012)
is anticipated that this work can shed new light on the 29. A.C. Cabral, L.S. Cavalcante, R.C. Deus, E. Longo, A.Z. Simões,
F. Moura, Ceram. Int. 40, 4445 (2014)
synthesis of nanomaterials. 30. X.D. Li, J.G. Li, D. Huo, Z.M. Xiu, X.D. Sun, J. Phys. Chem. C
113, 1806 (2009)
Acknowledgments This work was supported by the National Natural 31. I. Kosacki, V. Petrovsky, H.U. Anderson, P.J. Colomban, Am.
Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51072002 and 51272003), Out- Ceram. Soc. 85, 2646 (2002)
standing Young Talents Funded Projects of Suzhou University (Grant 32. J. Zdravković, B. Simović, A. Golubović, D. Poleti, I. Veljković,
Nos. 2014XQNRL010), and the Natural Science Research Fund of M. Šćepanović, G. Branković, Ceram. Int. 41, 1970 (2015)
Anhui Provincial Department of Education (KJ2016A775). 33. W.H. Weber, K.C. Hass, J.R. Mabride, Phys. Rev. B 48, 178
(1993)
34. Y.J. Lee, G.H. He, A.J. Akey, R. Si, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos,
References I.P. Herman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 12952 (2011)
35. H.L. Lin, C.Y. Wu, R.K. Chiang, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 341, 12
(2010)
1. J. Li, H.Q. Fan, X.H. Jia, J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 14684 (2010) 36. X. Lu, X. Li, F. Chen, C. Ni, Z. Chen, J. Alloys Compd. 476, 958
2. L.N. Wang, F.M. Meng, K.K. Li, F. Lu, Appl. Surf. Sci. 286, 269 (2009)
(2013) 37. B. Choudhury, A. Choudhury, Mater. Chem. Phys. 131, 666
3. B. Xu, Q.T. Zhang, S.S. Yuan, M. Zhang, T. Ohno, Chem. Eng. J. (2012)
260, 126 (2015) 38. S. Maensiri, C. Masingboon, P. Laokul, W. Jareonboon, V.
4. R.C. Rao, M. Yang, C.S. Li, H.Z. Dong, S. Fang, A.M. Zhang, J. Promarak, P.L. Anderson, S. Seraphin, Cryst. Growth Des. 7, 950
Mater. Chem. A 3, 782 (2015) (2007)
5. J. Zhang, H. Kumagai, K. Yamamura, S. Ohara, S. Takami, A. 39. D. Jiang, W.Z. Wang, E. Gao, S.M. Sun, L. Zhang, Chem.
Morikawa, H. Shinjoh, K. Kaneko, T. Adschiri, A. Suda, Nano Commun. 50, 2005 (2014)
Lett. 11, 361 (2011) 40. C.W. Sun, H. Li, L.Q. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 68, 1785
6. C.T. Campbell, C.H.F. Peden, Science 309, 713 (2005) (2007)
7. P. Bera, A. Gayen, M.S. Hegde, N.P. Lalla, L. Spadaro, F. 41. C.W. Sun, H. Li, H.R. Zhang, Z.X. Wang, L.Q. Chen, Nan-
Frusteri, F. Arena, J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 6122 (2003) otechnology 16, 1454 (2005)
8. N. Izu, T. Itoh, M. Nishibori, I. Matsubara, W. Shin, Sens. Actuat. 42. F. Lu, F.M. Meng, L.N. Wang, Y. Sang, J.J. Luo, Micro Nano
B Chem. 171, 350 (2012) Lett. 7, 624 (2012)
9. H. Li, G.F. Wang, F. Zhang, Y. Cai, Y.D. Wang, I. Djerd, RSC 43. S.Y. Chen, Y.H. Lu, T.W. Huang, D.C. Yan, C.L. Dong, J. Phys.
Adv. 2, 12413 (2012) Chem. C 114, 19576 (2010)
10. Z.L. Wang, Z.W. Quan, J. Lin, Inorg. Chem. 46, 5237 (2007) 44. J.H. Chen, Y.J. Lin, H.C. Chang, Y.H. Chen, L. Horng, C.C.
11. R.K. Singhal, S. Kumar, A. Samariya, M. Dhawan, S.C. Sharma, Chang, J. Alloys Compd. 548, 235 (2013)
Y.T. Xing, Mater. Chem. Phys. 132, 534 (2012) 45. A. Thurber, K.M. Reddy, V. Shutthanandan, M.H. Engelhard, C.
12. Z. Yang, D. Han, D. Ma, H. Liang, L. Liu, Y. Yang, Cryst. Wang, J. Hays, A. Punnoose, Phys. Rev. B 76, 165206 (2007)
Growth Des. 10, 291 (2010) 46. A. Tiwari, V.M. Bhosle, S. Ramachandran, N. Sudhakar, J.
13. J. Wei, Z. Yang, H. Yang, T. Sun, Y. Yang, CrystEngComm 13, Narayan, S. Budak, A. Gupta, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 142511
4950 (2011) (2006)
14. H. Imagawa, S.H. Sun, J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 2761 (2012) 47. P. Slusser, D. Kumar, A. Tiwari, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 142506
15. Z. Guo, F. Du, G. Li, Z. Cui, Cryst. Growth Des. 8, 2674 (2008) (2010)
16. X.H. Lu, X. Huang, S.L. Xie, D.Z. Zheng, Z.Q. Liu, C.L. Liang, 48. S.Y. Chen, C.H. Tsai, M.Z. Huang, D.C. Yan, T.W. Huang, A.
Y.X. Tong, Langmuir 26, 7569 (2010) Gloter, C.L. Chen, H.J. Lin, C.T. Chen, C.L. Dong, J. Phys.
17. X.H. Lu, D.Z. Zheng, J.Y. Gan, Z.Q. Liu, C.L. Liang, P. Liu, Chem. C 116, 8707 (2012)
Y.X. Tong, J. Mater. Chem. 20, 7118 (2010) 49. M.I.B. Bernardi, A. Mesquita, F. Beron, K.R. Pirota, A.O. de
18. G.Z. Chen, C.X. Xu, X.Y. Song, W. Zhao, Y. Ding, S.X. Sun, Zevallos, A.C. Doriguetto, H.B. de Carvalho, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Inorg. Chem. 47, 723 (2008) Phys. 17, 3072 (2015)
19. K.B. Zhou, X. Wang, X.M. Sun, Q. Peng, Y.D. Li, J. Catal. 229, 50. L.N. Wang, F.M. Meng, Mater. Res. Bull. 48, 3492 (2013)
206 (2005)
123