Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 1 / 96
Solow Growth Model Solow Growth Model
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 2 / 96
Solow Growth Model Households and Production
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 3 / 96
Solow Growth Model Households and Production
Key Assumption
∂F ( ) ∂F ( )
FK (K , L, A) > 0, FL (K , L, A) > 0,
∂K ∂L
∂2 F ( ) ∂2 F ( )
FKK (K , L, A) < 0, FLL (K , L, A) < 0.
∂K 2 ∂L2
Moreover, F exhibits constant returns to scale in K and L.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 5 / 96
Solow Growth Model Households and Production
Review
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 6 / 96
Solow Growth Model Market Structure, Endowments and Market Clearing
K s (t ) = K d (t )
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 9 / 96
Solow Growth Model Firm Optimization
Firm Optimization I
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 10 / 96
Solow Growth Model Firm Optimization
Firm Optimization II
and
R (t ) = FK [K (t ), L(t ), A(t )]. (5)
Note also that in (4) and (5), we used K (t ) and L (t ), the amount of
capital and labor used by …rms.
In fact, solving for K (t ) and L (t ), we can derive the capital and labor
demands of …rms in this economy at rental prices R (t ) and w (t ).
Thus we could have used K d (t ) instead of K (t ), but this additional
notation is not necessary.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 11 / 96
Solow Growth Model Firm Optimization
Y (t ) = w (t ) L (t ) + R (t ) K (t ) .
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 12 / 96
Solow Growth Model Firm Optimization
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 13 / 96
Solow Growth Model Firm Optimization
Production Functions
F(K, L, A) F(K, L, A)
K K
0 0
Panel A Panel B
Figure: Production functions and the marginal product of capital. The example in
Panel A satis…es the Inada conditions in Assumption 2, while the example in
Panel B does not.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 14 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Fundamental Law of Motion of the Solow Model
K (t + 1) = (1 δ ) K (t ) + I (t ) , (6)
Y (t ) = C (t ) + I (t ) , (7)
Using (1), (6) and (7), any feasible dynamic allocation in this
economy must satisfy
K (t + 1) F [K (t ) , L (t ) , A (t )] + (1 δ ) K (t ) C (t )
for t = 0, 1, ....
Behavioral rule of the constant saving rate simpli…es the structure of
equilibrium considerably.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 15 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Fundamental Law of Motion of the Solow Model
S (t ) = I (t ) = Y (t ) C (t ) .
S (t ) = sY (t ) , (8)
C (t ) = (1 s ) Y (t ) (9)
Implies that the supply of capital resulting from households’behavior
can be expressed as
K s (t ) = (1 δ )K (t ) + S (t ) = (1 δ)K (t ) + sY (t ) .
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 16 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Fundamental Law of Motion of the Solow Model
K (t + 1) = sF [K (t ) , L (t ) , A (t )] + (1 δ ) K (t ) . (10)
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 17 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time De…nition of Equilibrium
De…nition of Equilibrium I
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 18 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Equilibrium
R (t ) = f 0 (k (t )) > 0 and
w (t ) = f (k (t )) k (t ) f 0 (k (t )) > 0. (13)
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 20 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Equilibrium
Y (t ) = F [K (t ) , L (t ) , A (t )]
= AK (t )α L (t )1 α
, 0 < α < 1. (14)
y (t ) = Ak (t )α ,
(1 α )
= αAk (t ) ,
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 22 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Equilibrium
k(t+1)
45°
sf(k(t))+(1–δ)k(t)
k*
k(t)
0 k*
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 24 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Equilibrium
Thick curve represents (22) and the dashed line corresponds to the
45 line.
Their (positive) intersection gives the steady-state value of the
capital-labor ratio k ,
f (k ) δ
= . (16)
k s
There is another intersection at k = 0, because the …gure assumes
that f (0) = 0.
Will ignore this intersection throughout:
1 If capital is not essential, f (0) will be positive and k = 0 will cease to
be a steady state equilibrium
2 This intersection, even when it exists, is an unstable point
3 It has no economic interest for us.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 25 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Equilibrium
k(t+1)
45°
sf(k(t))+(1−δ)k(t)
k*
ε
k(t)
0 k*
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 26 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Equilibrium
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 27 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Equilibrium
output
δk(t)
f(k(t))
f(k*)
consumption
sf(k(t))
sf(k*)
investment
k(t)
0 k*
Proposition Consider the basic Solow growth model and suppose that
Assumptions 1 and 2 hold. Then there exists a unique steady
state equilibrium where the capital-labor ratio k 2 (0, ∞) is
given by (23), per capita output is given by
y = f (k ) (17)
c = (1 s ) f (k ) . (18)
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 29 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Equilibrium
Proof
s f(k(t))+(1–δ)k (t)
k(t+1 ) 45° k(t+1 ) 45°
k(t+1)
45 ° sf(k(t))+(1–δ)k(
sf(k(t))+(1 –δ)k(t)
0
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 31 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Equilibrium
f (k ) = af˜ (k ) ,
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 32 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Equilibrium
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 33 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Equilibrium
∂c (s ) ∂k
= f 0 (k (s )) δ . (20)
∂s ∂s
sgold is such that ∂c (sgold ) /∂s = 0. The corresponding steady-state
golden rule capital stock is de…ned as kgold .
Proposition In the basic Solow growth model, the highest level of
steady-state consumption is reached for sgold , with the
corresponding steady state capital level kgold such that
f 0 kgold = δ. (21)
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 35 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Equilibrium
consumption
(1–s)f(k*gold)
savings rate
0 s*gold 1
Figure: The “golden rule” level of savings rate, which maximizes steady-state
consumption.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 36 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Equilibrium
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 37 / 96
The Solow Model in Discrete Time Equilibrium
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 38 / 96
Transitional Dynamics in the Discrete Time Solow Model Transitional Dynamics
k (t + 1) = sf (k (t )) + (1 δ ) k (t ) . (22)
C (t ) = (1 s ) Y (t ) (24)
R (t ) = f 0 (k (t )) > 0 and
w (t ) = f (k (t )) k (t ) f 0 (k (t )) > 0. (25)
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 39 / 96
Transitional Dynamics in the Discrete Time Solow Model Transitional Dynamics
sf(k(t))+(1–δ)k(t)
k*
k(t)
0 k*
Transitional Dynamics
Equilibrium path: not simply steady state, but entire path of capital
stock, output, consumption and factor prices.
In engineering and physical sciences, equilibrium is point of rest of
dynamical system, thus the steady state equilibrium.
In economics, non-steady-state behavior also governed by optimizing
behavior of households and …rms and market clearing.
Need to study the “transitional dynamics” of the equilibrium
di¤erence equation (22) starting from an arbitrary initial capital-labor
ratio k (0) > 0.
Key question: whether economy will tend to steady state and how it
will behave along the transition path.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 41 / 96
Transitional Dynamics in the Discrete Time Solow Model Transitional Dynamics
x (t + 1) = G (x (t )) , (26)
x (t ) 2 Rn and G : Rn ! Rn .
Let x be a …xed point of the mapping G ( ), i.e.,
x = G (x ) .
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 43 / 96
Transitional Dynamics in the Discrete Time Solow Model Transitional Dynamics
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 44 / 96
Transitional Dynamics in the Discrete Time Solow Model Transitional Dynamics
k = g (k ) . (28)
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 45 / 96
Transitional Dynamics in the Discrete Time Solow Model Transitional Dynamics
g 0 (k ) 2 (0, 1) .
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 46 / 96
Transitional Dynamics in the Discrete Time Solow Model Transitional Dynamics
k (t + 1) k = g (k (t )) g (k )
Z k
= g 0 (k ) dk,
k (t )
< 0
First line follows by subtracting (28) from (27), second line uses the
fundamental theorem of calculus, and third line follows from the
observation that g 0 (k ) > 0 for all k.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 47 / 96
Transitional Dynamics in the Discrete Time Solow Model Transitional Dynamics
Thus far Solow growth model has a number of nice properties, but no
growth, except when the economy starts with k (0) < k .
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 49 / 96
Transitional Dynamics in the Discrete Time Solow Model Transitional Dynamics
k*
k(t)
0 k(0) k* k’(0)
x (t + 1) x (t ) = g (x (t )) . (30)
x (t + ∆t ) x (t ) ' ∆t g (x (t )) ,
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 51 / 96
The Solow Model in Continuous Time Towards Continuous Time
x (t + ∆t ) x (t )
lim = ẋ (t ) ' g (x (t )) , (31)
∆t !0 ∆t
where
dx (t )
ẋ (t )
dt
Equation (31) is a di¤erential equation representing (30) for the case
in which t and t + 1 is “small”.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 52 / 96
The Solow Model in Continuous Time Steady State in Continuous Time
Nothing has changed on the production side, so (25) still give the
factor prices, now interpreted as instantaneous wage and rental rates.
Savings are again
S (t ) = sY (t ) ,
Consumption is given by (24) above.
Introduce population growth,
Recall
K (t )
k (t ) ,
L (t )
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 53 / 96
The Solow Model in Continuous Time Steady State in Continuous Time
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 55 / 96
The Solow Model in Continuous Time Steady State in Continuous Time
output
(δ+n)k(t)
f(k(t))
f(k*)
consumption
sf(k(t))
sf(k*)
investment
k(t)
0 k*
y = f (k )
c = (1 s ) f (k ) .
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 57 / 96
The Solow Model in Continuous Time Steady State in Continuous Time
New result is higher n, also reduces the capital-labor ratio and output
per capita.
means there is more labor to use capital, which only accumulates
slowly, thus the equilibrium capital-labor ratio ends up lower.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 58 / 96
Transitional Dynamics in the Continuous Time Solow Model Dynamics in Continues Time
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 59 / 96
Transitional Dynamics in the Continuous Time Solow Model Dynamics in Continues Time
k(t)
k(t)
0 k(t)
k*
f(k(t))
s –(δ+g+n)
k(t)
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 61 / 96
A First Look at Sustained Growth Sustained Growth
F [K (t ) , L (t ) , A (t )] = AK (t ) , (35)
F [K (t ) , L (t ) , A (t )] = AK (t ) + BL (t ) , (36)
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 62 / 96
A First Look at Sustained Growth Sustained Growth
k̇ (t )
= sA δ n.
k (t )
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 63 / 96
A First Look at Sustained Growth Sustained Growth
and
y (t ) = exp ((sA δ n) t ) Ak (0) .
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 64 / 96
A First Look at Sustained Growth Sustained Growth
(A−δ−n)k(t)
k(t+1)
45°
k(t)
0 k(0)
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 65 / 96
A First Look at Sustained Growth Sustained Growth
Unattractive features:
1 Knife-edge case, requires the production function to be ultimately
linear in the capital stock.
2 Implies that as time goes by the share of national income accruing to
capital will increase towards 1.
3 Technological progress seems to be a major (perhaps the most major)
factor in understanding the process of economic growth.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 66 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Balanced Growth
Balanced Growth I
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 67 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Balanced Growth
100%
90%
Labor and capital share in total value added
80%
70%
60%
50%
Labor
Capital
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1929
1934
1939
1944
1949
1954
1959
1964
1969
1974
1979
1984
1989
1994
Figure: Capital and Labor Share in the U.S. GDP.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 68 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Balanced Growth
Balanced Growth II
Note capital share in national income is about 1/3, while the labor
share is about 2/3.
Ignoring land, not a major factor of production.
But in poor countries land is a major factor of production.
This pattern often makes economists choose AK 1/3 L2/3 .
Main advantage from our point of view is that balanced growth is the
same as a steady-state in transformed variables
i.e., we will again have k̇ = 0, but the de…nition of k will change.
But important to bear in mind that growth has many non-balanced
features.
e.g., the share of di¤erent sectors changes systematically.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 69 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Balanced Growth
K K K
Y
Y Y
Y
Y Y
0 L 0 L 0 L
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 71 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Balanced Growth
F̃ [K (t ) , L (t ) , A (t )] = AH (t ) F [AK (t ) K (t ) , AL (t ) L (t )] , (37)
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 72 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Uzawa’s Theorem
Uzawa’s Theorem I
w (t ) L (t ) R (t ) K (t )
αL (t ) and αK (t ) .
Y (t ) Y (t )
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 73 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Uzawa’s Theorem
Uzawa’s Theorem II
Theorem
(Uzawa I) Suppose L (t ) = exp (nt ) L (0),
Y (t ) = F̃ (K (t ) , L (t ) , Ã (t )),
Y (t ) = F (K (t ) , A (t ) L (t )) ,
Ȧ (t ) /A (t ) = g = gY n.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 74 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Uzawa’s Theorem
(gK + δ) K (t ) = Y (t ) C (t ) .
Then,
for all t τ.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 75 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Uzawa’s Theorem
for all t τ.
This equation can hold for all t τ
1 if gY = gC and Y (τ ) = C (τ ), which is not possible, since gK > 0.
2 or if gY = gK and C (τ ) = 0, which is not possible, since gC > 0 and
C (τ ) > 0.
3 or if gY = gK = gC , which must thus be the case.
Therefore, gY = gK = gC as claimed in the …rst part of the theorem.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 76 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Uzawa’s Theorem
exp gY t τ0 Y (t )
= F̃ exp gK t τ0 K (t ) , exp n t τ0 L (t ) , Ã τ 0
Y (t ) = F̃ K (t ) , exp t τ 0 (gY n) L (t ) , Ã τ 0 .
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 77 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Uzawa’s Theorem
Y (t ) = F [K (t ) , exp ((gY n) t ) L (t )] ,
= F [K (t ) , A (t ) L (t )] ,
with
Ȧ (t )
= gY n
A (t )
establishing the second part of the theorem.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 78 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Uzawa’s Theorem
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 79 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Uzawa’s Theorem
Stronger Theorem
Theorem
(Uzawa’s Theorem II) Suppose that all of the hypothesis in Uzawa’s
Theorem are satis…ed, so that F̃ : R2+ A ! R+ has a representation of
the form F (K (t ) , A (t ) L (t )) with A (t ) 2 R+ and
Ȧ (t ) /A (t ) = g = gY n. In addition, suppose that factor markets are
competitive and that for all t T , the rental rate satis…es R (t ) = R (or
equivalently, αK (t ) = αK ). Then, denoting the partial derivatives of F̃ and
F with respect to their …rst two arguments by F̃K , F̃L , FK and FL , we have
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 80 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Uzawa’s Theorem
Intuition
R (t ) K (t )
αK (t )
Y (t )
K (t ) ∂F [K (t ) , A (t ) L (t )]
=
Y (t ) ∂K (t )
= αK ,
Interpretation
Distressing result:
Balanced growth is only possible under a very stringent assumption.
Provides no reason why technological change should take this form.
But when technology is endogenous, intuition above also works to
make technology endogenously more labor-augmenting than capital
augmenting.
Not only requires labor augmenting asymptotically, i.e., along the
balanced growth path.
This is the pattern that certain classes of endogenous-technology
models will generate.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 83 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Uzawa’s Theorem
Further Intuition
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 85 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Solow Growth Model with Technological Progress
K̇ (t ) = sF [K (t ) , A (t ) L (t )] δK (t ) . (40)
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 86 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Solow Growth Model with Technological Progress
y (t ) = A (t ) ŷ (t ) (43)
= A (t ) f (k (t )) .
Hence use the terms “steady state” and balanced growth path
interchangeably.
Substituting for K̇ (t ) from (40) into (42):
k̇ (t ) sF [K (t ) , A (t ) L (t )]
= (δ + g + n) .
k (t ) K (t )
k̇ (t ) sf (k (t ))
= (δ + g + n) , (44)
k (t ) k (t )
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 89 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Solow Growth Model with Technological Progress
f (k ) δ+g +n
= . (45)
k s
Per capita output and consumption grow at the rate g .
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 90 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Solow Growth Model with Technological Progress
Equation (45), emphasizes that now total savings, sf (k ), are used for
replenishing the capital stock for three distinct reasons:
1 depreciation at the rate δ.
2 population growth at the rate n, which reduces capital per worker.
3 Harrod-neutral technological progress at the rate g .
Now replenishment of e¤ective capital-labor ratio requires
investments to be equal to (δ + g + n) k.
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 91 / 96
Solow Model with Technological Progress Solow Growth Model with Technological Progress
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 92 / 96
Comparative Dynamics Comparative Dynamics
Comparative Dynamics I
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 93 / 96
Comparative Dynamics Comparative Dynamics
k(t)
k(t)
0 k(t)
k* k**
f(k(t))
s’ –(δ+g+n)
k(t)
f(k(t))
s –(δ+g+n)
k(t)
Figure: Dynamics following an increase in the savings rate from s to s 0 . The solid
arrows show the dynamics for the initial steady state, while the dashed arrows
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 94 / 96
Comparative Dynamics Comparative Dynamics
Comparative Dynamics II
One-time, unanticipated, permanent increase in the saving rate from
s to s 0 .
Shifts curve to the right as shown by the dotted line, with a new
intersection with the horizontal axis, k .
Arrows on the horizontal axis show how the e¤ective capital-labor ratio
adjusts gradually to k .
Immediately, the capital stock remains unchanged (since it is a state
variable).
After this point, it follows the dashed arrows on the horizontal axis.
s changes in unanticipated manner at t = t 0 , but will be reversed
back to its original value at some known future date t = t 00 > t 0 .
Starting at t 0 , the economy follows the rightwards arrows until t 0 .
After t 00 , the original steady state of the di¤erential equation applies
and leftwards arrows become e¤ective.
From t 00 onwards, economy gradually returns back to its original
balanced growth equilibrium, k .
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 95 / 96
Conclusions
Conclusions
Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 2 and 3 November 1 and 3, 2011. 96 / 96