UNIVERSITY OF GARYOUNIS agg ld dealy FACULTY OF ENGINEERING Aawaigh! Aus CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPT. Ash Lat Ref. No 28 /2020 Date 12 /02/2020 gM) Lab g Akal) AY sla g wall anapall AS ys RESULT OF LABORATORY TESTS Dear Sir , In accordance with your request letter Ref. no 266 ¢ ¢ Ut dated 03/02/2020 to test the attached sub-grade sub-grade sample for suitability for pavement construction: We are pleased to provide you with the tests result as follow . TEST RESULT C.B.R. Test for sub-grade at natural moisture content ( unsoaked &undisturbed ) Force / penetration table gg | 2 [0036] ot | ots] o2s ae | 022 0.40 | 0.44 f2ical +o | ~ 2°) ee a}s}r]}se]fofule | . |_| | 5% | ae |. EE | £ | os |i fis! 2 |as| 3 | as Bs, chi h be | | |force penetration 08 07 0.6 05 04 03 02 01 | Se force on planger KN 0 225 4 5 6 8 10 penetration of planger (mm) C.B.R. value = 2.27 % Discussion of the obtained result T.RRL. Transport and Road Researely Laboratory (U.K. ) clearly stated in the TECHNNNICAL MEMORANDOM NO. H6/ 78 [ A capping layer are to be included in the road pavement design whenever the C.B.R. of the normal sub-grade soil is likely to be less than 5%]. In this case the C.B.R. is 2.27 % which far less than 5% , then as a conclusion of that a capping layer should be provided Limitations 1- It should be noted that the above test were performed on sample collected and delivered to our laboratory by the project owner under the supervision of our lab .technician 2. The persons signed below are merely responsible for conducting the test and for technical data in this report, they are in no way responsible for method of selecting. and sampling the material . Checked by FS at By, \ Tested by: Moharfed Abdelsalam M Bjorn (associated professor L \ \\ Department of civil Engineering