You are on page 1of 7

Cordillera Career Development College

Buyagan, Poblacion, La Trinidad, Benguet


College of Law

Course Syllabus

Course Title : Public International Law


Number of Units : 3 Units
Course Description : A study of the basic principles of international law and an overview of the legal principles governing international relations based,
among others, on the United Nations Charter, the doctrines of well-known and recognized publicists, and the decisions of
international tribunals and bodies.

Teaching Methodology:

Class time will be used for a combination of lectures, discussions, and research exercises. Students will be asked to explain readings and concepts, to offer analysis
of cases and to express their opinion.

References:
 Bernas S.J.; Introduction to Public International Law; 2009 Edition.
 Cruz, I.; International Law; 2003 Edition.
 Nachura, A.;Outline Reviewer in Political Law; 2009 Edition.
 Bjorge, E. and Miles C.; Landmark Cases in Public International Law; 2017 edition.
 Boas, Gideon; Public International Law, Contemporary Principles and Perspectives; 2012 edition.

SCHED TOPICS LEARNING OUTCOMES/ KEYWORDS/CONCEPTS CASES/LAWS/ TREATIES


ULE GUIDE QUESTIONS READINGS
Week 1 General Principles1 For the students to be able to:  Public International Law  Section 2, Art. II, Philippine
01/17/20  Definitions  Define certain terms in relation  Private International Law Constitution
 Relationship between to international law.  Obligations erga omnes  Article VII, Section 21 of the
international law and municipal  Differentiate between Public  Jus cogens Constitution
law International Law from Private  Ex aequo et bono  Kuroda v Jalandoni, 53 Phil 171.
 Historical development of International Law  Borovsky v Commissioner of
 Conflict Laws
International Law  Relate the historical immigration, G.R. No. L 4362 (1951).
 Dualism vs Monism

1
Cruz, Pp 1-19.

Syllabus: Public International Law/Atty. Miller E. Quintin, Jr. Page 1 of 7


development of international  Doctrine of Incorporation and the  https://opinion.inquirer.net/126630/do-
law. Doctrine of Transformation great-powers-comply-with-arbitral-
 Distinguish between Monist  rulings
and Dualist theories of
international law.
 Is “International Law” law?
 In case of conflict between
municipal law and
international law, which
should prevail?
Week 2 Sources of obligations in For the students to be able to:  Treaties and Conventions  Article 38(1) of the ICJ Statute
01/25/20 international law2  Identify and expound on the  International Agreements  Armed Activities on the Territory of the
 Consensual Basis of International sources of obligations in  International customs Congo, ICJ Rep 168.
Law international law.  General principles of law  Philippines v. China (PCA case number
 The Obligatory Nature of  Differentiate between a  Judicial decisions 2013–19)
International Law subject and an object of  States
 Sources of International Law international law.
 International Organizations
 Subjects and Objects of  Distinguish between the
 Individuals
International law doctrine of incorporation and
 The International Community the doctrine of transformation

Week 3 The concept of the state in For the student to be able to:  Elements of a state  Oetjen v Central Leather Co, 246 US
2/01/20 International Law  Identify the elements of a  The Right of Existence and Self 2974
 Recognition of States state. Defense
 Recognition of Government  State whether recognition is  The Right of Independence
 Concept of State Continuity an element of statehood.  The Drago Doctrine 3
 Fundamental Rights of States  Discuss the fundamental rights  The Right of Equality
 Succession or Continuity of States of states.  The Right to Peaceful Co-existence

Week 4 Territory in International Law For the student to be able to:  terra nullius  Philippines v. China (PCA case number
2/08/20  Define territory under  Archipelagic doctrine 2013–19)
international law.  Patrimonial Sea  Western Sahara Case, Advisory

2
Boas, et.al Pp 47-118
3
Cruz, Pp 105.
4
Cruz, Pp 89.

Syllabus: Public International Law/Atty. Miller E. Quintin, Jr. Page 2 of 7


 Territory: Land, Air, Outer Space 5  Determine the extent of  The High Seas Opinion ICJ (1975)
jurisdiction and authority  Baselines  Eastern Greenland Case, PCIJ 1933.
which a state exercises over a  Archipelagic states  The Island of Palmas Case
territory.  Internal waters  1967 Treaty on the Exploration and Use
 Territory: Law of the Sea6  Distinguish the rights of the  Territorial sea of Outer Space.
coastal state in the territorial  Contiguous zone  Convention on the Law of the Sea
sea, the contiguous zone, the  RA 3046
 Exclusive economic zone
exclusive economic zone, and  RA 5446
the continental shelf.  Continental shelf and extended
 What is the doctrine of continental shelf
innocent passage?  International Tribunal for the Law of
 What are the five freedoms in the Sea
a state’s aerial domain?  The Philippine claim to the Spratlys.
 The Philippine claim to Sabah

Week 5 Jurisdiction of states7 For the student to be able to:  Nationality principle and  Blackmer v United States, 284 US 421,
2/15/20  Basis of jurisdiction  Define the general principles statelessness Bernas, S.J., Pp 140-141
 Exemptions from jurisdiction concerning extradition.  Effects Doctrine  The Lotus Case, France v Turkey, PCIJ
 Extradition  Territoriality principle (1927)
 Protective principle  Mejoff v Director of Prisons, 90 Phils 70
 Universality principle (1951)
 Passive personality principle  Filartiga v Pena-Irala, 630 F.2D 876
 International organizations and its (1980)
officers  Attorney General of Israel v Eichmann,
Trial Court of Decision

Week 6 Immunity from Jurisdiction 8  What is the act of state  Act of State doctrine  The Pinochet Case
2/22/20  State Immunity doctrine?  Immunity of International  Republic v Vinzon, GR No. 154705,
 Diplomatic Immunities  When may a state be held Organizations June 26, 2003.
 Consul and Consular Immunities liable for acts committed  Diplomats  The Schooner Exchange v MacFaddon,
against another state?  Consuls 11 US 116. (Cruz, Pp 195)
 What immunities are enjoyed  United States of America v Hon. V.M.
by diplomatic and consular Ruiz, GR No. L 35645, May 22, 1985.

5
Bernas, pp 103-116.
6
Bernas, Pp 120-131.
7
Bernas, S.J., Pp 133-190
8
Bernas Pp 192-219.

Syllabus: Public International Law/Atty. Miller E. Quintin, Jr. Page 3 of 7


officers? (Cruz, Pp 196)
 United States v Ho. Luis Reyes, GR No.
79253, March 1, 1993. (Cruz, Pp. 197)
 Holy See v. Eriberto Rosario, Jr. GR No
101949, Dec. 1, 1994. (Cruz Pp, 197)
 US Diplomatic and Consular Staff in
Iran Case
Week 7 General principles of treaty law For the student to be able to:  Treaty  Article VII, Section 21 of the
2/29/20  Interpretation of Treaties  Discuss the function and  Conventions Constitution
 Amendment and Termination of purpose of treaties.  Protocols  Tanada v Angara, 272 SCRA 18.
Treaties.  Explain the treaty making  http://cilj.co.uk/2018/06/21/was-
process. president-dutertes-unilateral-
 What are the requisites of a withdrawal-of-the-philippines-from-
valid treaty under the the-rome-statute-legally-valid/
constitution?

Week 8 Nationality and Statelessness For the student to be able to:  Repatriation  Labo v Comelec, 176 SCRA 1.
3/7/20 Doctrine of state responsibility  Distinguish between  Multiple Nationality  Caire Claim, France v Mexico (1929),
nationality and citizenship.  Statelessness Bernas Pp 230-232.
 Discuss and illustrate the  Rebus sic stantibus  Air France v Saks, 470 US 392
responsibilities of states in  Aliens  Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (United
regards the treatment of aliens Kingdom v Iceland.
in their jurisdiction.  Namibia Case, ICJ REP 1971 16
 How does one lose and  Danube Dam Case, Hungary vs
reacquire citizenship? Slovakia, 37 ILM 162
 Who are Filipino Citizens?

Week 9  Review of the Topics and discussions during the first half of the term
3/14/20  Submission of the required term papers
Week 10
3/21/20 MIDTERM EXAMINATIONS

Week 11  Extradition For the student to  Extradition  The Refugee Convention of 1951
3/28/20  Principles on Asylum  Distinguish extradition  Asylum  2016 Rohingya persecution in Myanmar
 Refugees from deportation  Deportation
Week 12 International Disputes For the students to:  International dispute  Philippines v. China (PCA case number
4/4/20

Syllabus: Public International Law/Atty. Miller E. Quintin, Jr. Page 4 of 7


 Peaceful Settlement of  Define International Disputes  Non-judicial or diplomatic methods 2013–19)
International Disputes  Identify and discuss the  Quasi-Judicial methods  Nicaragua v. The United States of
different modes of settlement  Judicial methods America (1986) ICJ 1.
of international disputes.  War  https://opinion.inquirer.net/126630/do-
 The Use of Force  Identify and discuss the  Traditionally Allowable Coercive great-powers-comply-with-arbitral-
different circumstances where Measures rulings
force may be employed in
international disputes.

Week 13 The Law of War For the students to:  Jus in Bello  Kim Chan v Valdez Tan Keh, 75 Phil 113.
4/11/20 International Humanitarian Law  Discuss the effects of the  Neutrality  The Hague Law
outbreak of war.  Neutralization  The Geneva Conventions of 1949
 Who are the participants  Postliminium  2016 Rohingya persecution in Myanmar
in war?  Armistice

 Truce
Week 14 International Criminal Law  Why is the Nuremberg  Genocide  Rome Statute of the ICC
4/18/20  Trial Before the International Trial considered a  Crimes against Peace  Yamashita v Styer, 75 Phil 563.
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg9 landmark case in  Crimes against Humanity
international law?
 What are the distinctions
between genocide crimes
against humanity and
against peace?
Week 15  International Trade Law For the student to discuss:  WTO  Tanada v Angara, GR No. 118295, May
4/25/20  Some basic principles in  Environment 2, 1997,(Bernas pp 337)
the different specialized  Human Rights  GATT 1947 and 1994
 International Environmental areas in international law.  The Kyoto Protocol
Law  1963 Declaration of Legal Principles
Governing the Activities of States in the
Exploration and Use of Outer Space
(GAR 1962)
 1966 Treaty on Principles Governing the
Activities of States in the Exploration
and Use of Outer Space, including the
Moon

9
Bjorge et. al., Pp 189-219

Syllabus: Public International Law/Atty. Miller E. Quintin, Jr. Page 5 of 7


and Other Celestial Bodies
 Oposa v. Factoran, G.R. No. 101083, July
30, 1993
 MMDA v. Concerned Residents of
Manila Bay, G.R. Nos. 171947-48,
December 18, 2008

Week 16 International Human Rights Law For the student to discuss:   UDHR 1948
5/2/20  Some basic principles in  2016 Rohingya persecution in
the different specialized Myanmar
areas in international law.
Week 17 Reporting on the Term Papers
5/9/20
Week 18 Reporting on the Term Paper
5/16/20
Week 19 FINAL EXAMS
5/22/20

Course Requirements and Grading System:

Term Paper Format and Instructions:

Font Name: Californian FB Font Size: 12


Minimum Number of Words: 2000 Margins: L=3.5 cm, T= 2.5 cm, T=2.5 cm, T=2.5 cm.
Paper size: A4
 The student must submit a term paper before the midterm examinations, otherwise no grade shall be credited to the student.

 An electronic copy (PDF or word document) shall likewise be submitted on or before the deadline to the following email address: abintew@gmail.com

Plagiarism rule: Submission of any plagiarized work shall be subject to an administrative penalty of a failing mark in the Final Grade. Such penalty
shall be imposed only after the student has been given the opportunity to be heard.

Midterm Grade

1. Class participation/attendance/recitation/assignments: (40%)

Syllabus: Public International Law/Atty. Miller E. Quintin, Jr. Page 6 of 7


Students are required to participate in class discussions, hence personal involvement and their preparation by reading the material assigned
for the particular schedule of the course.

2. Examination (Essay type) (60%)

Final Term Grade

1. Class participation/attendance/recitation/ (10%)


Students are required to participate in class discussions, hence personal involvement and their preparation by reading the material assigned
for the particular schedule of the course.
2. Term paper presentation and defense. (30%)

The student shall be given 15 minutes to present the term paper and its conclusions before the class. The class shall propound questions to the
student in relation to the paper presented. Comments and suggestions will be given during and after the presentation. The student will be
graded according to his/her communication skills/articulations skills, confidence, argument and synthesis, and content of the report and
reliability of the source or references.

3. Final Term Examination (Essay Type) (60%)

Final Grade

Final Grade= Midterm Grade (40%)+ Final Term Grade (60%)

Prepared and submitted by:

MILLER E. QUINTIN, JR.

Syllabus: Public International Law/Atty. Miller E. Quintin, Jr. Page 7 of 7

You might also like