Sukahati Chicken Processing currently uses a conventional method to allocate overhead costs proportionally across products, leading to cost distortions. This study aims to 1) analyze production costs for each product using activity-based costing, 2) compare costs to the company's current method, 3) identify value-adding and non-value-adding activities, and 4) analyze overhead cost allocation and efficiency. The results found that whole chicken, parts, and boneless products were overvalued by 0.02-0.32% while some other products were undervalued by 0.02-4.18%, indicating a cross-subsidy of overhead costs. Activity-based costing should be implemented to properly determine costs since non-unit
Sukahati Chicken Processing currently uses a conventional method to allocate overhead costs proportionally across products, leading to cost distortions. This study aims to 1) analyze production costs for each product using activity-based costing, 2) compare costs to the company's current method, 3) identify value-adding and non-value-adding activities, and 4) analyze overhead cost allocation and efficiency. The results found that whole chicken, parts, and boneless products were overvalued by 0.02-0.32% while some other products were undervalued by 0.02-4.18%, indicating a cross-subsidy of overhead costs. Activity-based costing should be implemented to properly determine costs since non-unit
Sukahati Chicken Processing currently uses a conventional method to allocate overhead costs proportionally across products, leading to cost distortions. This study aims to 1) analyze production costs for each product using activity-based costing, 2) compare costs to the company's current method, 3) identify value-adding and non-value-adding activities, and 4) analyze overhead cost allocation and efficiency. The results found that whole chicken, parts, and boneless products were overvalued by 0.02-0.32% while some other products were undervalued by 0.02-4.18%, indicating a cross-subsidy of overhead costs. Activity-based costing should be implemented to properly determine costs since non-unit
The Cost of Sukahati Chicken Processing Product Analysis
with Activity-Based Costing
Jaenudin
Sukahati Chicken Processing is a company which produces processed broil chicken
including: whole chicken, chicken parts, parting Wendy’s, parting KFC, boneless and Marinated (spicy and mild). At present, Sukahati Chicken Processing implements the conventional method to calculate the overhead cost of each product by dividing the overhead cost proportionally which leads to a distortion in cost. The purpose of this study is to: (1) analyze the cost of production of each product by activity-based costing; (2) compare the cost of production with company’s method; (3) analyze those activities which give added values, and non-added activities also activities which has no contribution at all in the production and (4) analyse the allocation of the overhead cost and the level of cost efficiency of the company. The data consist of primary and secondary data, which are of qualitative and quantitative obtained from internal and external sources. The method used to analyze the data is Activity- Based Costing. The results of this study indicate that the whole chicken, parting and boneless products are overvalued by 0.02 – 0.32 % whereas the product of parting Wendy’s , KFC (ABOB and HCC), marinated (spicy and mild) and chicken leg parting are undervalued by 0.02 – 4.18 %. This indicates that there has been a cross-subsidy of overhead cost between the products. The Activity-Based Costing method should be implemented in the Sukahati Chicken Processing to determine the cost of product because the overhead cost which is allocated based on non-unit cost has a significant percentage towards the total overhead cost.