KPI

5-M Element
Number

7
9

10

Model 11

13

14

41

42

20

21
Mitigation 22

23

28

29

30

Monitoring
31

32

34

Measurement 35
(Subset of
36
monitorinq)

KPI
5-M Element
Number
8
15
37
38
Maintenance
43
44
45
46
 KPls Established for External Corrosion Control

KPI Description 5-M Element

Materials of construction

Corrosion allowance (wall thickness)

Potential upset conditions in the upstream sector affecting this sector

Potential upset conditions in this sector affecting downstream sector Model

Mechanisms of corrosion

Maximum corrosion rate (External)

Installation of proper accessories during construction

External corrosion rate, after maintenance activities

Percentage difference between targeted mitigated external corrosion rate or corrosion rate
from monitoring or inspection technique and corrosion rate before maintenance activities
Mitigation
Mitigation to controlexternal corrosion - is it necessary?

Mitigation strategies to controlexternal corrosion

Mitigated external corrosion rate,target

Percentage time efficiency of external corrosion mitigation strategy

External corrosion monitoring techniques

Number of probes per square area to monitor external corrosion Monitoring

External corrosion rate, from monitoring technique

Percentage difference between targeted mitigated external corrosion rate and corrosion
rate from monitorinQ technique

Frequency of inspection Measurement

Percentage difference between targeted mitigated external corrosion rate or corrosion rate (Subset of
from monitorinq techniques and corrosion rate from inspection technique monitorinq)
Measurement data availability

Validity and utilization of measured data

KPls Established for Maintenance Program

KPI Description 5-M Element

Main operating conditions

Commissioning
Procedures for establishing the maintenance schedule
Maintenance activities
Workforce - Capacity, education, and training Management
Workforce - Experience, knowledge, and quality
Data management - Data to database
Data management - Data from database
 KPls Established for Internal Corrosion Control
KPI
KPI Description
Number

6 Materials of construction

7 Corrosion allowance (wall thickness)

9 Potential upset conditions in the upstream sector affecting this sector

10 Potential upset conditions in this sector affecting downstream sector

11 Mechanisms of corrosion
12 Maximum corrosion rate (Internal)

14 Installation of proper accessories during construction

39 Internal corrosion rate,after maintenance activities

40 Percentage difference between targeted and mitigated internal corrosion rate

16 Mitigation to control internal corrosion - is it necessary?

17 Mitigation strategies to control internal corrosion

18 Mitigated internal corrosion rate,target

19 Percentage time efficiency of internal corrosion mitigation strategy

24 Internal corrosion monitoring techniques

25 Number of probes per square area to monitor internal corrosion

26 Internal corrosion rate,from monitoring technique

Percentage difference between targeted mitigated internal corrosion rate and
27
corrosion rate from monitorinq technique
32 Frequency of inspection

Percentage difference between targeted mitigated internal corrosion rate or

33 corrosion rate from monitorinq techniques and corrosion rate from inspection
technique
35 Measurement data availability

36 Validity and utilization of measured data

KPls Established for Management Program

KPI
KPI Description
Number
1 Segmentation of the infrastructure
2 Corrosion risks
3 Location of the infrastructure
4 Overall corrosion risk (Risk times consequence)
5 Life of the infrastructure
47 Internal communication strategy
48 External communication strategy
49 Corrosion management review
50 Failure frequency
 Ranking of KPIs
KPI Status Ranking Score Ranking Color
Not-relevant 0 Blue (N A)

Accounted for adequately 1 Green (good)

Accounted for inadequately 2 to 3 Yellow (fair)

Not adequately accounted for 4 to 5 Red (poor)

Not analyzed 5 White

 Table 2 Summary of KPI for Corrosion Control Context
KPI KP0-KP23 Remarks:

0-1: Segment less than 1 km

1 3 2-3: Segment greater than 1 km

4-5: Variable segmentation or non

0-1: Low or no corrosion risk

2 0 2-3: Secondary corrosion risk

4-5: Main corrosion risk

0-1: Low consequence of failure

3 2 2-3: Medium consequence of failure

4-5: High consequence of failure

0-1: Overall corrosion risk low

4 0 2-3: Overall corrosion risk medium

4-5: Overall corrosion risk high

0-1: Life between 1-5 years

5 5 2-3: Life between 5-10 years

4-5: Life more than 10 years

Table 4 Summary of KPI for Internal Corrosion Mitigation

KPI KP0-KP23 Remarks:

0-1: No mitigation required based on design

16 1 2-3: Mitigation required based on design

4-5: Mitigation required based on current operating conditions

0-1: No mitigation required or properly implemented

17 3 2-3: Mitigation implemented for current operating conditions

4-5: Mitigation improper for current operating conditions

0-1: Mitigated corrosion rate based on baseline

18 1 2-3: No basis for selection of mitigated corrosion rate

4-5: Unknown mitigated corrosion rate

0-1: 99% Availability of mitigation practices

19 3 2-3: 95-99% Availability of mitigation practices

4-5: Less than 95% Availability of mitigation practices

Table 6 Summary of KPI for External Corrosion Mitigation

KPI KP0-KP23 Remarks:

0-1: Proper mitigation strategies from design stage

20 1 2-3: Proper mitigation strategies based on current knowledge

4-5: Mitigation strategies based on outdated knowledge

0-1: Corrosion control and baseline from first year

21 1 2-3: Corrosion control from first year but baseline not

4-5: Corrosion control implemented but unknown baseline

0-1: Mitigated corrosion rate based on baseline

22 1 2-3: No basis for selection of mitigated corrosion rate

4-5: Unknown mitigated corrosion rate

 0-1: 99% Availability of mitigation practices

23 3 2-3: 95-99% Availability of mitigation practices

4-5: Less than 95% Availability of mitigation practices

Table 9 Summary of KPI for Measurement

KPI KP0-KP23 Remarks:

0-1: All corrosion related data is available and usable

35 3 2-3: All corrosion related data is available but not usable

4-5: Not all the corrosion related data is available

0-1: Data validated according to documented procedure

36 1 2-3: Data not properly validated but used for corrosion rate

4-5: Data not properly validated and used to guide corrosion rate
Table 3 Summary of KPI for Internal Corrosion Control Model
KPI KP0-KP23 Remarks:

0-1: Material selection based on corrosion

6 IC 1 2-3: Material adequate with corrosion control

4-5: Unknown suitability of material

0-1: Proper corrosion allowance

7 IC 3 2-3: Corrosion allowance with corrosion control

4-5: Improper corrosion allowance

0-1: Plan to control of upstream segments implemented

9 IC 1 2-3: Plan to control upset upstream not implemented

4-5: No plan to control upset upstream

0-1: Plan to control of downstream segments implemented

10 IC 1 2-3: Plan to control upset downstream not implemented

4-5: No plan to control upset downstream

0-1: Proper knowledge of corrosion mechanisms

11 IC 3 2-3: Some knowledge of corrosion mechanisms

4-5: Improper knowledge of corrosion mechanisms

0-1: Corrosion rate based on model

12 1 2-3: No basis for selection of corrosion rate

4-5: Unknown corrosion rate

0-1: Corrosion professional involved in all stages

14 IC 5 2-3: Corrosion professional involved in some stages

4-5: Corrosion professional not involved

0-1: Corrosion rate reduced after maintenance activities

39 3 2-3: Corrosion rate maintained after maintenance activities

4-5: Corrosion rate increased after maintenance activities

0-1: Corrosion rate within 10% of expected

40 3 2-3: Corrosion rate less than 10% of expected

4-5: Corrosion rate is more than 10% of expected

Table 7 Summary of KPI for External Corrosion Model

KPI KP0-KP23 Remarks:

0-1: Material selection based on corrosion

6 EC 1 2-3: Material adequate with corrosion control

4-5: Unknown suitability of material

0-1: Proper corrosion allowance

7 EC 3 2-3: Corrosion allowance with corrosion control

4-5: Improper corrosion allowance

0-1: Plan to control of upstream segments implemented

9 EC 1 2-3: Plan to control upset upstream not implemented

4-5: No plan to control upset upstream

 0-1: Plan to control of downstream segments implemented

10 EC 1 2-3: Plan to control upset downstream not implemented

4-5: No plan to control upset downstream

0-1: Proper knowledge of corrosion mechanisms

11 EC 3 2-3: Some knowledge of corrosion mechanisms

4-5: Improper knowledge of corrosion mechanisms

0-1: Corrosion rate based on model

13 1 2-3: No basis for selection of corrosion rate

4-5: Unknown corrosion rate

0-1: Corrosion professional involved in all stages

14 EC 3 2-3: Corrosion professional involved in some stages

4-5: Corrosion professional not involved

0-1: Corrosion rate reduced after maintenance activities

41 3 2-3: Corrosion rate maintained after maintenance activities

4-5: Corrosion rate increased after maintenance activities

0-1: Corrosion rate within 10% of expected

42 3 2-3: Corrosion rate less than 10% of expected

4-5: Corrosion rate is more than 10% of expected

Table 5 Summary of KPI for Internal Corrosion Monitoring Table 10 Summary of KP
KPI KP0-KP23 Remarks: KPI

0-1: Two or more complimentary monitoring techniques

24 1 2-3: One monitoring technique proven to be effective 8

4-5: No monitoring or ineffective (not proven) monitoring

0-1: Probes in all critical locations an non-critical

25 1 2-3: Probes in most of the critical locations 15

4-5: Probes in some of the critical locations

0-1: Corrosion rates from two monitoring within 10%

26 1 2-3: Corrosion rates from two monitoring within 11-25% 37

4-5: Corrosion rates from two monitoring within > 25%

0-1: Mitigated corrosion rates from two monitoring within 10%

27 1 2-3: Mitigated corrosion rates from two monitoring within 11-25% 38

4-5: Mitigated corrosion rates from two monitoring within > 25%

0-1: Frequency of inspection based on RBI

32 IC 1 2-3: Frequency of inspection based on engineering processes 43

4-5: More than then 10 without inspection

0-1: Corrosion rate from monitoring and inspection within 10%

33 3 2-3: Corrosion rate from monitoring and inspection within 11-25% 44

4-5: Corrosion rate from monitoring and inspection within >25%

45

46

Table 8 Summary of KPI for External Corrosion Monitoring Table 11 Summary of KP

KPI KP0-KP23 Remarks: KPI

0-1: Two or more complimentary monitoring techniques

28 3 2-3: One monitoring technique proven to be effective 47

4-5: No monitoring or ineffective (not proven) monitoring

0-1: Probes in all critical locations an non-critical

29 1 2-3: Probes in most of the critical locations 48

4-5: Probes in some of the critical locations

0-1: Corrosion rates from two monitoring within 10%

30 3 2-3: Corrosion rates from two monitoring within 11-25% 49

4-5: Corrosion rates from two monitoring within > 25%
 0-1: Mitigated corrosion rates from two monitoring within 10%

31 3 2-3: Mitigated corrosion rates from two monitoring within 11-25% 50

4-5: Mitigated corrosion rates from two monitoring within > 25%

0-1: Frequency of inspection based on RBI

32 EC 1 2-3: Frequency of inspection based on engineering processes

4-5: More than then 10 without inspection

0-1: Corrosion rate from monitoring and inspection within 10%

34 3 2-3: Corrosion rate from monitoring and inspection within 11-25%

4-5: Corrosion rate from monitoring and inspection within >25%

Table 10 Summary of KPI for Maintenance
KP0-KP23 Remarks:

0-1: Operating conditions within range

3 2-3: 10% Outside proper operating conditions

4-5: Frequent inadequate operating conditions

0-1: Proper commissioning and baseline established

1 2-3: Proper commissioning but non baseline established

4-5: Improper commissioning

0-1: Preventive maintenance based on risk before ALARP

3 2-3: Preventive maintenance based on higher risk levels

4-5: Corrective maintenance

0-1: All maintenance activities are adequately planned

3 2-3: Some delays for the implementation of maintenance activities

4-5: Frequent changes to maintenance activities

0-1: Corrosion personnel enough and with proper training

3 2-3: Corrosion personnel is enough and some training

4-5: Insufficient corrosion personnel and training

0-1: All personnel have more than five years of experience

3 2-3: Only key personnel have more than 5 years of experience

4-5: Unknown experience of corrosion personnel

0-1: Automatic collection and storage of corrosion data

1 2-3: Data measured and manually stored

4-5: Not adequate management of data

0-1: Data verified, stored and proactively used

3 2-3: Data verified and stored but not used proactively

4-5: Not adequate management of data

Table 11 Summary of KPI for Management

KP0-KP23 Remarks:

0-1: Proper internal communication

1 2-3: Some internal communication

4-5: Improper internal communications

0-1: Proper external communication

1 2-3: Some external communication

4-5: Improper external communications

0-1: Annual revision of KPIs

3 2-3: Revision of KPIs every 2-5 years

4-5: Not established schedule for KPIs revision

 0-1: Zero failures between KPIs reviews

1 2-3: Less than 5 failures between KPIs reviews

4-5: More than 5 failres between KPIs reviews

 Internal Corrosion 39
15
14
12
11
10
9 19 27
3 8 18 26
2 7 17 25
1 6 16 24 37
Management

Maintenance
Monitoring
Mitigation
Model
Corrosion
(15 %)

4 6 20 28 45
5 7 21 23
49 8 22 30
50 9 23 31
10
11
13
14
External Corrosion 15
41
40
KPI Status
Not-relevant
36 Accounted for adequately

35 Accounted for inadequately

33 Not adequately accounted for

32 Not analyzed
44
43
38

Corrosion
Corrosion %
Control 4.28571428571429
(85 %) 0.909090909090909
1.25
2.5
46 6.25
47 15
48
32
34
35
36

42
Ranking of KPIs
Ranking Score Ranking Color
0 Blue (N A)
1 Green (good)
2 to 3 Yellow (fair)
4 to 5 Red (poor)
5 White

Corrosion Control

85 %