The Abdullah Hamdok government will soon become a war government if it continues to follow its path

a little and will pursue the wanted list of international justice if it does not nullify the military and
political coup in the country.

The Abdullah Hamdok government will be the most failing government in the history of Sudan and the
world if he continues this approach a little and all the evidence and scenes confirm this.

The Abdullah Hamdok government will soon become a war government if it does not retract the military
and political coup in Sudan first.

As I studied alongside law, the media, and mass communication media, international relations and
diplomatic studies, and for the past two decades I have closely followed the Sudanese issue, and is
involved in its events influencing and influencing, but the government of the employee of organizations,
Dr. Hamdock, has neither the ability, the competence nor the understanding to solve any of the
country's crises Sticking and complex.

There is no peace until the situation is seriously preserved in Sudan in general and Darfur in particular,
and Mr. Abdullah Hamdock must be honest. Peace did not and will not come from the failed Juba
platform, on which he based his speech and his request to the UN Security Council.

The political, economic, and security situation did not and will not stabilize except to nullify the military
and political coup first and foremost.

UNAMID forces are a red line. They must remain in Darfur under Chapter VII, thus providing them with
equipment and delegating them with full powers to become rapid intervention forces and repel any
attack or violation that occurs against unarmed civilians in Darfur, because they are forces under
Chapter Seven, and we warn everyone that they unite to keep and consolidate their authority because
they are weak forces. It is a very serious development, and its planned exit next October.

Article text

Freedom is not given in doses, so one is either free or not free.

Nelson Mandela.

Freedom is not given in doses so one is either Free or not Free.

The state of ebb and flow, which has started since I wrote my article under the title (Corona Juba, the
caliphate, the deep state, Gabriel and Arman, and the role of security officer Kamiri, Al-Hadi Idris
Yahya).In which I promised the Sudanese people that we will go to enlightenment as usual in the Sudan
Liberation Movement / Army, by possessing the masses of the Sudanese people who have the stakes
and masters of the podium, the facts are complete, as they revolve against them at all levels, to take a
measure and a historical reaction.

The debate intensified, and the controversy intensified after the intention of the (strong declaration of
freedom and change) to incubate the illegitimate government of Abdullah Hamdouk (the de facto
government), its intention to replace the military rulers of the states with civilian rulers and civilian
governments, which it initiated with the military ruler of the state of Khartoum, and was installed by the
coup Minister of Defense.

The political tensions have increased between the Sudanese political arena, who were gathered by lust
for authoritarianism and conspiracy against the Sudanese people, the kidnapping of their will and the
actions of Al-Afeel so far. The differences and slopes between the two arch-historic people, the Umma
and the Communist Party in particular, and the components of the forces of freedom and change in
general. The Umma Party froze its membership in the forces of declaring freedom and change for two
weeks, in a malicious and cunning tactic of political calculations from the Mazoum party.

The political, economic, social, and security arenas have not and will not be stabilized except to nullify
the military and political coup, and to stop the attempts to kidnap the will of the Sudanese people and
steal their revolution from the military group of Al-Bashir, and conspired with the forces of the
declaration of freedom and change, as (the oud and the shadow are not crooked) as for a full civil and
civilian government from Independents of the Sudanese people, only honorable and honorable people,
and cross the country to safety, political, economic, social, cultural and security stability.

 Or a coup as is the current situation .. Civilians must be in the sovereign council, and the transitional
government first. Then the regions and thus the states and provinces.

1/

The revolutions of the advanced peoples and modern democracies that exist in the countries of the
developed world today, docked after bitter conflicts between the church and the state or what has been
termed them (the struggle between the empire and the papacy) .. and the wars, political, economic,
social, cultural and class conflicts that prevailed in ancient Europe between the Safavid classes of nobles
and men Religion and the blackness of the people, and anchored their application of international
human rights standards, and the articles above the general constitutional that guarantee them public
and private freedoms, including their right - i.e. the people - to isolate and change authoritarian
government, as well as their natural rights T can not be waived, and has the right individuals and groups
resist the government tyrannical.

Among these declarations are the Great Testament (Magna Carta), England 1215 - the American
Independence Declaration 1776 - the French Revolution Declaration 1789 - the Universal Declaration
1948 - and the two covenants 1966 - 1977.

2/

Soucial contact theorists

 (Theorists of the social contract since the first philosophers, Plato, Socrates, Aristotle, and modernists
such as Samuel Pfendorf, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and many other
philosophers). And the theoretical social contract between the state and the people .. that is (the
relationship between the ruler and the ruled), and the philosophy of their presentation has settled ..
And the logic of the theory of the historical development of the social contract they have, that the
popular revolution is the mother of legitimacy at all in the case of a people who revolted against a
dictatorship, and in the case The success of the popular revolution is the people are the government and
the government is the people because A (i.e. government) must derive from their collective will, and
from their agreement (i.e., the revolutionaries) on its components, constitution, systems, laws and
regulations, which is the basis of international legitimacy, and all democratic governments in the
developed world today, i.e. (the world after the French Revolution). Docked the general theory

In that revolutionary legitimacy is legitimate above any statutory law and constitution established by a
group of people. This was demonstrated by the philosopher of the revolutionary model (the French
Revolution) Jean-Jacques Rousseau in that in the case of the popular revolution there is no government
and people, but there is a revolution and revolutionaries whose victory must prevail and dictate their
will in the state's executive, legislative and judicial institutions, and there must be A government
emanating from the people to implement the will of the people and their desire for the desired change.

  This was evident in the revolutionary stance of the Sudanese people, which was summed up in three
fundamental principles: freedom, peace, justice, and revolution, the choice of the people.

When the head of the regime, Omar al-Bashir, fell in a statement broadcast by his deputy and defense
minister Awad bin Auf and installed himself as a military ruler of the country, the Sudanese people said
they have not yet fallen.

And when Ibn Auf fell .. and another transitional military council was formed headed by the army
inspector Abdel-Fattah Al-Burhan, they said .. (civil government ... oh eternal child) and (have not fallen
yet) .. and the Sudanese people continued their sit-in until they were killed in the night beast.

3/

The grave situation of Sudan, the tragic situation of the Sudanese people, and the failure of Abdullah
Hamduk’s government in everything terrible, for the simple reason that it is not in its revolutionary
legitimacy, because its political incubator (the forces of freedom and change) has pounced on the will
and kidnapping of the people, denied it to the revolution and the revolutionaries, and the security
committee of al-Bashir participated in its coup, because The Sudanese revolution, which started in all
villages and cities of Sudan, must derive its legitimacy from itself, and it is not from the forces of
freedom and change that have stripped themselves of the will on the Sudanese people and imposed
their laws and regulations by force of force and arms ... and that by conspiring with militarism and
imposing its hegemony by transfer B and bloody options killed the Sudanese people at night on the
eighth of Ramadan.

4/

The popular revolution is a supra-constitutional and super-legal situation that is not subject to the
rulings of the judiciary nor to any legality other than the legitimacy of the Sudanese people themselves.

The popular uprising, or what is termed it (revolutionary legitimacy), is an expression of the will of the
unified or semi-unified popular masses to overthrow the existing regimes, including the constitutions of
those regimes, and any law that impedes the path of the revolution, and this is what the Sudanese
people in Sudan deservedly made.

However, the circumvention of the will of the people and attempts to kidnap it by the military and the
political ideological forces (the forces of freedom and change) and its rocks that live in it today and the
war of data, intersections, deficits and catastrophic failure in everything in the Sudanese state, is
nothing but concrete evidence.

5/

 The Declaration of Freedom and Change has strengthened partners in ending the sit-in of the Sudanese
people in front of the General Command.

On Monday, June 3, 2019, when armed forces affiliated with Al-Bashir and her security committee,
represented by the Military Council and with the strong support of the Rapid Support Forces and the
security forces, stormed the sit-in using heavy weapons

The light, tear gas and the flames in the flames and the sit-in stations to disperse the peaceful
demonstrators, killing hundreds of protesters and hundreds of wounded.

We said at that time, with the text posted on my Facebook page, haidar elnur Facebook, with the same
date shown above, that /

The Sudan Liberation Movement / Army considers what happened to the unarmed peaceful protestors
today as a war crime and a crime against humanity, in which they bear full responsibility for what has
been called (the Military Council) and (the forces of declaring freedom and change) equally, because
they are legitimate in the right they do not possess by trying to make lost deals and unsuccessful wrap It
is exposed to the victorious and victorious Sudanese revolution, inevitably soon.

The SLA movement will go to international courts and justice to bring immediate war criminals to
justice ... our text has ended.
And that is our steadfast conciliator, which we repeat. We strongly reject attempts to cover up the
killers through the Nabil Adeeb Committee .. We also reject any circumvention, kidnapping or robbery of
the Sudanese people and imposing guardianship over them.

Legitimacy first is to overthrow the coup and topple the government of Abdullah Hamdok, first and
foremost in the center, then civil and civil government flow in all of Sudan.

6/

The situation after Bashir's overthrow must differ completely and in detail, and this is what did not
happen by all criteria .. revolutionary legitimacy must be .. the legitimacy of the Sudanese people
because it is the lady of political affairs in the country .. and in all events of the Sudanese state from a
transitional government with full powers headed by Abd God Hamdouk or Ojddok and from the
government of independent non-partisan and sovereign council and determine the transitional period of
the revolutionaries themselves, and everything because popular legitimacy is the lady of legitimacy as
we have presented.

7/

 The central ideological and Safavid holding parties, like their own, intentionally, intentionally and
vigorously, have reproduced the old Sudanese hellish series, renewed since the dawn of independence,
and the coup deliberately wanted this Sudanese people at the national level.

8/

On the regional level in Darfur, in particular, the group of earthworkers from the Justice and Equality
Movement (JEM) has restored the dangerous hellish series, which led to the separation of the south,
who were their fuel under the pretexts and claims of Islamic Jihad, and that the southerners are infidels,
njos, and dogs must be cut off all of them and arbitration of the alleged law of God.

 The mentality of the military wing of the territorial integrity of the Justice and Equality Movement will
simply lead to the continuation of the state's war against its citizens, and will inevitably lead to the
fragmentation of the Sudanese state, and will make the government of Abdullah Hamdok a government
of war sooner rather than later.

In other words, the Sudanese regime has fallen into a massive popular revolution, and there must be a
revolutionary government that abrogates the constitution, and consequently all unfair laws, such as the
articles of the Sudanese Criminal Law 1991 that make all revolutionaries and armed opposition groups
rule them to death ... as articles authorizing the constitutional system ... which legalized the state's war
against citizen.

The terrorism of the state was practiced most widely in the south, in the Nuba Mountains, and in the
Blue Nile, and in Darfur during the Dawood Bolad and the entire Abid villages. Thousands of people
were executed extrajudicially. The regime and its militias committed atrocities and horrors against the
Sudanese people in Darfur.

As for the beginning of the current millennium, the tragedy of the century was in Darfur, as we all lived
through and we saw the opinion of Al-Ain.

9/

Having studied alongside law, the media, and mass media, international relations and diplomatic
studies, and I have seen most strategic studies and research on the Sudanese issue, and closely followed
what has been happening in Sudan for nearly twenty years and has been involved in its events, a maker
and leader of many of its developments with our comrades in the movement / The Sudan Liberation
Army and the masses of our people are influential and influenced by it

 It goes without saying that the Sudanese problem in general and the problem of Sudan in Darfur,
Southern Kordofan, Blue Nile, and Eastern Sudan have not and will not be resolved .. In the absence of
the role of the international community and its continued support, which in return strongly rejects any
role of the Sudanese Justice and Equality Movement and classifies them openly as a terrorist movement
and obstructing peace In Darfur, its leadership has done what is no secret to those who follow the
course of events, both domestically and internationally.

10 /

This leads us to assert and firmly believe that the de facto government led by the staff member of the
organizations, Dr. Abdullah Hamdouk, will be the best government in the history of Sudan, and the
whole world. Because it is simply a government without powers, mandates, programs and strategies,
the government of Hamdock has neither the ability nor the understanding and the desirable will, and
therefore it will be a government of war, and it will be a cover for genocide and widespread ethnic
cleansing, and will cause the country to be divided into pieces.

I repeat and sound the alarm that the de facto government will be a war government because it is a
government without programs, without a comprehensive national strategy .. a government without
powers and no mandate, and the military side (the sovereign council) will take advantage of the civil city
of Hamdok to provide the expenses of the war against our Sudanese people, especially in areas of
political conflict Armed, and thus will fail miserably in achieving a comprehensive, just and sustainable
peace in the country.

 11
 The comprehensive and just peace that the Sudan Liberation Army seeks to manufacture is a peace that
all the people of Sudan enjoy in an inch of the land of Sudan. . And all parts of Sudan will prevail without
exception .. Peace of the brave .. Peace of the masses, No peace of people .. No peace of the elite and
merchants of war .. No peace of elites and leaders stationed in the heart of the empire of the three cities
Khartoum, Bahri and Omdurman ... No peace of jobs and positions .. And purchase The leaders owe the
peace of the oppressed masses, a peace that extracts the rights of war victims and guarantees their
permanent security and safety.

12 /

 Finally, and it is the most dangerous thing ever on Sudan and its provinces ... The step of Dr. Abdullah
Hamdouk, Prime Minister of the de facto government, who sent two letters to the UN Security Council
within the past few months.

In his first speech on January 27, 2020, published on the website of the United Nations Security Council,
in which he requested the Security Council to establish a peace support operation in the form of a
special political mission that includes a strong peace component under Chapter VI of the Charter of the
United Nations, and Hamdock asked in his speech to cover The mission shall be in the entirety of the
Sudanese territories, provided that the mission is "creative, graceful, coordinated and light", as soon as
possible, provided that the mission begins sending its personnel urgently to assist and facilitate the
peace process in Juba, and to assist Sudan in mobilizing international economic assistance, including
support to organize efforts Donor Conference. He demanded that the assistance in applying the
document of the constitutional declaration and other issues be added to the mission's mandate.

In your last speech, Hamdock also requested the United Nations support for peace negotiations
between the parties to armed conflicts, assistance in mobilizing economic and development assistance,
and coordinating and facilitating humanitarian aid, in addition to assistance and capacity-building in all
matters related to the success of the political and democratic transition in Sudan and others that Mr.
Abdullah Hamdouk requested of UN Security Council .

The important fundamental question is why Abdullah Hamdouk seeks to trade his falsehood in power
legally, politically and morally for the fate of millions of Sudanese people in Darfur and other than
Darfur? !! .

Are the de facto Prime Minister Abdullah Hamdock's estimates that what is going on in Juba will solve a
single village crisis? !!

Is this the opinion of his partners regarding the alleged peace present in Juba? !! ..Does Mr. Abdullah
Hamdock, a prominent official in the organizations, want to go along with the coupists at the will of the
Sudanese people, from the military security committee of al-Bashir to attack the millions of Sudanese
people, so that there is an international mission under his orders to protect himself and reinforce his
usurped power by the United Nations forces like the coupists from the Council The military, which was
called the Sovereign Council after the addition of a bridle of civilians. !! .

The questions are many and the answers are clear. What the prime minister of the putschists offers is
very dangerous, which calls for a decisive stance from the masses of our crushed people before it is too
late.

13 /

I do not want in this hurry, as this is the legal aspect of Mr. Abdullah Hamdock’s strange move in the
light of international humanitarian law and the relevant United Nations charters, as it is affordable for
whoever he wants .. But I just want to send a critical message to Dr. Abdullah Hamdouk that it should
review immediately .. immediately. In this disastrous move before it is too late and before you catch
yourself on the wanted list of international justice in The Hague.

Or immediately address the issue of Darfur and the UNAMID mission that we have been in the Sudan
Liberation Movement / Army, we demand that it support and expand its authority to the force of
imposing peace ... to become forces that have the right to intervene immediately in the event of any
attacks on civilians.

 UNAMID forces must repent

Point out the tasks to catch the perpetrators immediately and respond to any attacks against unarmed
civilians.

 As for the peace that we want, we repeat that it is out of reach in light of the current mentality .. and
the current situation in the country .. There is no peace in the shadow of the military and political coup ..
No peace and death in every inch of the land of Darfur, as happens today and before today ...

What has been going on in Abuja and Doha and Addis Ababa, Juba, salaam, people .. Peace to buy off
receivables ... Peace to bribe individuals ... Peace that many Sudanese people have rejected before and
today is more rejected ... No peace comes from Juba because it has lost the public, moral and legal
bond.

 We will separate in this midst what we want because we have prepared what is required for nearly
twenty years, and the SLA will inevitably be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize with merit and merit very
soon.

Haider Muhammad Ahmad al-Nur

Home News

Sudan from Chapter Seven to Six: Absent Truths “Part One” .. Written by: Ahmed Hussein Adam

May 3, 2020 1:03 PM in News, Free Pens

I promised some honorable friends and friends to write about the subject of the upcoming UN mission
to Sudan, which has caused intense debate and intense political polarization that threatens a dangerous
division in Sudan, in light of the two letters that the Prime Minister of the Transitional Government in
Sudan, Dr. Abdullah Hamdouk, sent to the UN Security Council On January 27, 2020 and February 27,
2020. In his first speech, Hamdock asked for the UN Security Council to send a special political mission
with a strong peacebuilding component under Chapter VI of the UN Charter, while in his second speech
he sent it to the Security Council a month later. From the history of the line Its first, the United Nations
in support of peace negotiations between the parties to armed conflicts and to assist in the mobilization
of economic and development assistance, and the coordination of humanitarian assistance and
facilitation, as well as assistance and capacity building in all matters relating to the success of the
political transition and democratic Sudan.

I do not want to go into detail about the causes and reasons for the polarization, polarization, and acute
political division brought about by a speech made by you to the Security Council - in this part of the
article - because I will discuss this later in the folds of this article, however, I would like to draw the
attention of dear readers to the ongoing debate On the subject of the forthcoming UN mission, it has
distorted and confused many issues, concepts, terms, norms and standards established in international
law, and the texts of the Charter and practices of the United Nations during its long march since the year
1945. Of course, some may have - intentionally or unintentionally - misled and confused papers, and
perhaps this resulted Confused The confusion is the result of the failure of the Hamdock government to
explain the matter of professionalism and the required transparency, or perhaps that was the result of
the method or mechanism through which it was sent to the UN Security Council.

Be that as it may, there are important topics and elements that we would like to highlight. It is a modest
contribution to rationalize and direct the ongoing debate towards its manifestations, trends and goals
beneficial to the homeland, away from superficiality, purpose and political exploitation. The most
prominent of these topics are: what is Chapter VI and Chapter Seven of the Charter of the United
Nations and the difference between them; and do UN peacekeeping missions under Chapter VI mean
international guardianship in any way? The content and goals of Hamdock's speech; and why did all this
controversy and acute political polarization arise in Sudan and abroad? What is the relationship of
UNAMID to the prospective political mission; will the mission have a mandate to protect civilians? Will
the special political mission replace UNAMID? If the special mission does not have a mandate or includes
a military or "police" component to protect civilians, how will it fill the security void in Darfur, and what
force will protect civilians? The army, the police, the Rapid Support Forces, or a joint force that will
emerge from the ongoing peace paths with armed movements? What is happening behind the scenes of
the UN Security Council regarding this matter, especially the positions of the major countries and African
countries represented in the UN Security Council? The dilemma and the director.

Chapters VI and VII of the Charter of the United Nations

As is known, Chapter VI of the Charter relates to resolving disputes in accordance with peaceful means.
It contains six active substances (33 to 38). This chapter relates to interstate disputes, as well as internal
disputes that arise within the territory of the state and threaten international peace and security.
Whereas, the first paragraph of Article 33 in Chapter Six requires the parties to any conflict that
endangers international peace and security to seek its solution in the beginning through negotiation,
investigation, mediation, conciliation, arbitration and judicial settlement, or that they resort to UN
agencies and regional organizations. But if the parties to the conflict fail to resolve the armed conflict by
peaceful means, they must submit it to the Security Council, or recommend automatically to the
Security Council what it deems appropriate if it considers that the continuation of the conflict may
endanger international peace and security. The seventh chapter relates to the use of force in cases of
threats to international peace and security and the occurrence of aggression, and it contains thirteen
articles (39 to 51), beginning with economic and commercial measures and sanctions and the air and sea
blockade leading to the use of armed force.

Do peacekeeping missions mean international custody?

Peacekeeping missions under Chapter VI of the Charter do not mean international custody in any way.
As international guardianship is an international legal concept that means that a particular political
region is subject to the administration of another country, according to special conditions stipulated in
an agreement concluded between them and supervised by the implementation of the "Trusteeship
Council" of the United Nations. The United Nations established the Trusteeship System since its
foundation in 1945, under Chapter 12 of its Charter. This is to supervise some of the regions that were
fighting for independence from the colonial countries, with a view to promoting them politically,
economically and socially and achieving prosperity for their people, in addition to qualifying them for
self-government and self-determination in order to achieve world peace. As is well known, the
guardianship system has replaced the mandate system that was in place during the era of the League of
Nations, which was replaced by the United Nations, as the guardianship system has been applied to
countries without sovereignty. According to this system, the United Nations designated 11 political
territories that were included in the trusteeship system. Whereas, Article 77 of the Charter of the United
Nations stipulates that the guardianship system include territories that fall into the following categories:
territories placed under a mandate established by the United Nations after the First World War;
territories carved out of so-called “enemy states” due to the Second World War; and territories that
place them under guardianship According to the desire of the countries responsible for managing it.
This, and the trusteeship system has completed its historical mission, as there are no longer any
provinces subject to it