Page 500 Conference Proceeding..

Top Roof Displacement of Elevated Water Tank

Over Alternate Column Proportionality
Chirag N. Patel1, Shashi N. Vaghela2, H. S. Patel3
1
Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Engineering Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research University,
Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.,
2
Associate Professor, Applied Mechanics Department, L. D. College of Engineering Ahmedabad,
Gujarat, India
*
P.G. Student, Applied Mechanics Department, L. D. College of Engineering, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

1
cnpatel.693@gmail.com
2
shashi_vghl@yahoo.com
3
dr.hspatel@yahoo.com

Abstract—Elevated water tanks are commonly used for storing
water in public water distribution system and it should be
competent of keeping the expected performance during and after
earthquake. It has large mass concentrated at the top of slender
supporting structure and hence extremely vulnerable against
horizontal forces due to earthquake. They must be functional
even after earthquakes to ensure water supply is available in
earthquake-affected regions. A dynamic analysis of such tanks
must take into account the motion of the water relative to the
tank as well as the motion of the tank relative to the ground.
Therefore, an understanding of the earthquake damage, or
survival, of elevated water tanks requires an understanding of
the effect of dynamic forces at each level from bottom to top. For
certain proportions of the tank and the structure the
displacement of the tank may be the dominant factor, whereas
for other proportions the displacement of tank may have small
effect. The main aim of this study is to understand the seismic
behaviour of the elevated water tank under alternate column
proportionality under different time history records using finite
element software SAP 2000. The present work aims at checking
the adequacy of water tank for the seismic excitations. The result
shows that the structure responses are exceedingly influenced by
different column proportionality and earthquake characteristics.
The responses include displacement of elevated water tank at
each level from bottom to top under the four different time
history have been compared and contrasted.
Keywords—Water tank; Seismic Analysis; Sloshing
displacement; Staging; Fluid structure interaction; SAP 2000.
I. INTRODUCTION
Water is essential to humans and other life forms. Supply of
drinking water is essential immediately after destructive
earthquakes. Without assured water supply, the uncontrolled
fires subsequent to major earthquakes may cause more
damage than the earthquakes themselves. So the water supply
system should be designed as seismic resistant and seismic
performance of water tanks draws special significance in the
design. Generally, to store the water different types of
structures are used like; underground, ground supported and
elevated water tanks. Elevated water tank is a structure which
is constructed at a sufficient height to cover a large area for
the supply of water. The performance of elevated water tanks
during earthquakes is of much interest to engineers, not only
because of the importance of these tanks in controlling fires,
but also because the simple structure of an elevated tank is
relatively easy to analyse and, hence, the study of tanks can
be informative as to the behaviour of structures during
earthquakes. In the past earthquakes including Bhuj
earthquake of 26 January 2001, damages had been observed
widely in the support structures, which is typical of the
damage sustained to a large number of water tanks of
capacities ranging from 80 m3 to 1,000 m3 and as far away as
125 km from the epicentre (Rai, 2001). During the Chilean
earthquakes of May, 1960 a number of elevated water tanks
were badly damaged (K. V. Steinbrugge and R. Flores). Other
elevated water tanks survived without damage (W. K. Cloud).
Most of the previous studies were focused on the tank
containing liquid considering only one mass and it does not
cover important aspect for analysis and design of water tanks
related to the effect of hydrodynamic pressure of the water,
which produce due to vibration of tank when earthquake
strikes. But after the Bhuj earthquake, revision of current
Indian code became inevitable. Hence, it was decided to
develop guidelines under the project “Review of Building
codes and preparation of Commentary and Handbooks”
assigned by the Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority
(GSDMA), Gandhinagar to the Indian Institute of Technology
Kanpur in 2003 [1]. The stimulus of the present study is to
understand the behaviour of different supporting system of
elevated water tank, under alternate column proportionality
and acceleration time history records of different
characteristics. Also, impulsive and convective water masses
inside the container are taking in to consideration and
modelled with FE software SAP2000 [3].
II. MODAL PROVISIONS
A satisfactory spring mass analogue to characterize basic
dynamics for two mass model of elevated tank was proposed

NCIET-2013, SRPEC ISBN 978-81-925650-0-2

 Conference Proceeding..
by Housner (1963) after the chileane earthquake of 1960,
which is more appropriate and is being commonly used in
most of the international codes including GSDMA guideline.
During lateral mode of shaking of the water tank, a upper part
of the water moves in a long period sloshing motion, while the
rest part moves rigidly with the tank wall. The former one is
recognized as convective mass of water which exerts
convective hydrodynamic pressure on tank wall and base,
while the latter part is known as impulsive mass of water
which accelerates along with the wall and induces impulsive
hydrodynamic pressure on tank wall. The impulsive mass of
water experiences the same acceleration as the tank container
and contributes predominantly to the base shear and
overturning moment. In spring mass model convective mass
(mc) is attached to the tank wall by the spring having stiffness
(Kc), whereas impulsive mass (mi) is rigidly attached to tank
wall. For elevated tanks two-mass model is considered, which
consists of two degrees of freedom system. Spring mass
model can also be applied on elevated tanks, but two-mass
model idealization is closer to reality. The two- mass model is
shown in Figure 1.
Fig.1 Two mass model
The two-mass model was first proposed by G. M. Housner
(1963) and is being commonly used in most of the
international codes. However, for most of elevated tanks it is
observed that both the time periods are well separated. Hence,
the two-mass idealization can be treated as two uncoupled
single degree of freedom system as shown in Figure 1 (b). The
stiffness (Ks) is lateral stiffness of staging. The mass (ms) is
the structural mass and shall comprise of mass of tank
container and one-third mass of staging as staging will acts
like a lateral spring. Staging part of elevated water tanks
follows the provisions given by Criteria for design of RCC
staging for overhead water tanks (First revision of IS 11682):
Draft Code [2].
III. FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION
During lateral base excitation seismic ground acceleration
causes hydrodynamic pressure on the tank wall which depends
ISBN 978-81-925650-0-2
Page 501
on the geometry of tank, height of liquid, properties of liquid
and fluid-tank interaction. Proper estimation of hydrodynamic
pressure requires a rigorous fluid-structure interaction analysis.
In the mechanical analogue of tank-liquid system, the liquid is
divided in two parts as, impulsive liquid and convective liquid.
The impulsive liquid moves along with the tank wall, as it is
rigidly connected and the convective and sloshing liquid
moves relative to tank wall as it under goes sloshing motion.
This mechanical model is quantified in terms of impulsive
mass, convective mass, and flexibility of convective liquid.
Housner (1963) developed the expressions for these
parameters of mechanical analogue for circular and
rectangular tanks. Some researchers have attempted numerical
study for tanks of other shapes (Joshi, 2000 and Damatty,
2000). There are some experimental studies on the effect of
obstructions on the sloshing frequency (Kimura et al. 1995,
Armenio 1996, and Reed et al. 1998). Fluid–structure
interaction problems can be investigated by various
approaches such as added mass approach (Westergaard, 1931
[5]; Barton and Parker, 1987), the Eulerian approach
(Zienkiewicz and Bettes, 1978), the Lagrangian approach
(Wilson and Khalvati, 1983; Olson and Bathe, 1983) or the
Eulerian–Lagrangian approach (Donea et al., 1982). The
simplest method of these is the added mass approach as shown
in Figure 2, can be investigated using some of conventional
FEM software such as SAP2000, STAAD Pro and LUSAS.
The general equation of motion for a system subjected to an
earthquake excitation can be written as,
. . . . . . . . (1)
In which M, C and K are mass, damping and stiffness
matrices, , and u are the acceleration, velocity and
displacement respectively, and is the ground acceleration. In
the case of added mass approach the form of equation (1)
become as below:
. . . . . . . . . (2)
In which M* is the new mass matrix after adding
hydrodynamic mass to the structural mass, while the damping
and stiffness matrices are same as in equation (1).
Fig 2. FEM model for fluid-strucutre-interaction added mass approach
Westergaard Model’s method was originally developed for
the dams but it can be applied to other hydraulic structure,
under earthquake loads i.e. tank. In this paper the impulsive
mass has been obtained according to GSDMA guideline
NCIET-2013, SRPEC
 Page 502 Conference Proceeding..

technique and is added to the tanks walls according to different type of column on outer periphery of staging with
Westergaard Approach as shown in Figure 3 using equation 3. variation in panel is shown in Table II.
Where, ρ is the mass density, h is the depth of water and Ai is
the area of curvilinear surface. TABLE I
Structural Data for Basic Frame Type Staging
b
Capacity of Rise of Concal
1000 m3 2.35 m
the tank dome
Tank Wall
Unit weight Thickness of
25 kN/m3 0.5 m
Ai of concrete Conical shell
h
yi
z Thickness of
0.15 m
Rise of Bottom
1.6 m
Ai Top Dome dome
y Thickness of
Rise of Top
Hydrostatic Hydrodynamic 2.2 m Bottom dome 0.2 m
Dome
shell
(a) (b)
Size of Top 0.35 m × Number of
8
Fig 3. (a) Westergaard added mass concept (b) normal and cartesian Ring Beam 0.35 m Columns
directions. Diameter of 0.5 m ×
13.6 m Size of Bracing
tank 0.5 m
Height of
. . . . . . . . (3) Size of Bottom 1m×
Cylindrical 6.8 m
Circular Girder 1.2 m
wall
Distance
IV. PROBLEM DESCRIPTION Thickness of
between
The frame type is the most commonly used staging in Cylindrical 0.33 m 4m
intermidiate
practice. The main components of frame type of staging are wall
bracing
columns and braces. In frame staging, columns are arranged Size of Height of
on the periphery and it is connected internally by bracing at 1.2 m ×
Middle Ring Staging above 16 m
various levels. The staging is acting like a bridge between 0.6 m
Beam Foundation
container and foundation for the transfer of loads acting on the
tank. In elevated water tanks, head requirement for
distribution of water is satisfied by adjusting the height of the
staging portion. Different types of column pattern are used for
water tank .The geometry of column is also the important part
to understand the behaviour of tank. A reinforced elevated
water tank with different types of column system with full
water level in the container has been considered for the
present study. The storage capacity of water tank is 1000 m3. Circular column Square column
Finite element model of elevated water tank is prepared in
SAP 2000. Columns and bracings in the frame type support
system are modelled as frame elements (with six degrees of
freedom per node). Conical part, bottom and top domes and
container walls are modelled with thin shell elements (with
four nodes and six degrees of freedom per node). Other Rect_deep column Rect_wide column
dimensions of the elevated tanks are illustrated in Table I.
The configuration of staging is nothing but the Fig 4. Arrangement of different type of column on outer periphery of staging
arrangements of columns and bracings in particular pattern.
The orientation and section of column is also important in Total four numbers of earthquake records were used; the
deciding the configuration for staging [4]. Several types of maximum PGA on the basis of acceleration gravity for
configuration can generate by changing the arrangement and Imperial Valley (El Centro) (1979), Northridge (1994), Kobe
pattern of columns. In the present study three types of shapes (1995) and Loma Prieta (1989) are 0.314, 0.410, 0.509 and
have been considered like circular, square and rectangle. In 0.644 respectively. Properties of recorded earthquakes are as
rectangular type of column different two type of arrangement shown in Table 3.
are considered in line of outer periphery and perpendicular to
outer periphery named as rect_wide and rect_deep
respectively. The arrangement of column on outer periphery
of staging is as shown in Figure 4. The dimension of the

NCIET-2013, SRPEC ISBN 978-81-925650-0-2

 Conference Proceeding.. Page 503

TABLE II
Column dimension considering different panel and pattern

Column size
Number of Column Height of Model
panel pattern Diameter Depth Width Staging No.
(m) (m) (m)
3-panel Circular 0.75 - - 12 1
Square - 0.665 0.665 12 2
Rect_deep - 0.5 0.8 12 3
Rect_wide - 0.5 0.8 12 4
4-panel Circular 0.75 - - 16 5
Square - 0.665 0.665 16 6
Rect_deep - 0.5 0.8 16 7
Rect_wide - 0.5 0.8 16 8
5-panel Circular 0.75 - - 20 9
Square - 0.665 0.665 20 10
Rect_deep - 0.5 0.8 20 11
Rect_wide - 0.5 0.8 20 12

TABLE III
Properties of Earthquake records
Imperial Valley (El North Ridge, Kobe, Loma Prieta,
Record
Centro), (1979) (1994) (1995) (1989)
Canyon country
Station EC Meloland overpass Nishi-Akashi Corralitos
-w cost cany
IMPVALL NORTHR KOBE LOMAP
Component
/H-EMO000 /LOS000 /NIS000 /CLS000
PGA(g) 0.314 0.410 0.509 0.644
PGV(cm/s) 71.7 43.0 37.2 55.2
PGD(cm) 25.53 11.75 9.52 10.88
Magnitude 6.5 6.7 6.9 6.9

Fig.6 shows the graphical notification for different column patterns

ISBN 978-81-925650-0-2 NCIET-2013, SRPEC

Page 504 Conference Proceeding..

Fig.7 Displacement variation of 3-panel tank under four time history records

Fig.8 Displacement variation of 4-panel tank under four time history records

NCIET-2013, SRPEC ISBN 978-81-925650-0-2

 Conference Proceeding.. Page 505

Fig.9 Displacement variation of 5-panel tank under four time history records

V. RESULT AND CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES

In this study, a reinforced elevated water tank with 1000 m3
capacity and supported by fixed base frame type staging
system with different column proportionality has been
considered. With considering two-mass water model, seismic
responses including displacement of tank at various locations
from bottom to top were assessed under four earthquake
records. The seismic responses of tank have been determined
using time history analysis in three cases, i.e. 3-panel, 4-panel,
5-panel. Figure 6 shows the graphical representation for
different column patterns. Displacement variation of 3, 4 and
5 –panel tank for different column proportionality and time
history records are shown in figure 7, 8 and 9 respectively.
The obtained results are summarized as follows:
[1] IITK-GSDMA Guidelines for Seismic Design of Liquid Storage Tanks
Provisions with commentary and explanatory examples, 2003.
[2] Preliminary Draft code IS 11682:1985, “Criteria for Design of RCC
Staging for Overhead Water Tanks”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New
Delhi, June 2011.
[3] “Structural Analysis Program SAP2000. “ User’s manual, Computers
and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, Calif.
[4] R.K.Ingle,” Proportioning of columns for water tank supported
structures”, The Indian Concrete Journal, April 1999, pg. 255-257.
[5] Gareane A. I. Algreane et al., “Behaviour of Elevated Concrete Water
Tank Subjected to Artificial Ground Motion”, EJGE, Vol. 16,

• The critical response depends on the earthquake

characteristics and particularly frequency content of
earthquake records.
• Top roof displacement is increased with the increase in
the panel number and increase against high frequency
earthquake.
• Roof top displacement has been increase towards higher
number of panels, and it is in majority cases higher in
rect_deep type of staging pattern.
• Amongst all type of column proportionality, rect_deep
has been prove highly competitive to with stand against
structural responses like base shear, Overturning moment and
roof top displacement under different earthquake
characteristics.

ISBN 978-81-925650-0-2 NCIET-2013, SRPEC