Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/236634215
CITATIONS READS
2 152
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Study of molecular and crystalline structure of new nitrogen‐sulphur pro‐ligands with application in biomimetic chemistry View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Gerzon E. Delgado on 02 June 2014.
Abstract Potassium iron oxalate trihydrate [K3Fe(C2O4)3·3H2O] has been synthesized and its
crystal structure was refined by the Rietveld method using X-ray powder diffraction data collected
with a conventional diffractometer. The crystal structure consists of discrete Fe(C2O4)33- anions, K+
cations and water molecules, held together by electrostatic interactions.
Introduction
Experimental
A solution of 25 mL H2C2O4 1.0M was added slowly at room temperature to a solution of 5.0 g
Fe(NH4)2(SO)4·6H2O in 15 mL water. Yellow crystals of FeC2O4·2H2O precipitate were washed
and added to a solution of 10 mL K2C2O4 in 20 mL water at 333K. Then, to this solution 20 mL
H2O2 (3%) were added slowly with continued agitation at the same temperature. Green crystals of
K3Fe(C2O4)3·3H2O precipitated and were separated by filtration and air-dried at room temperature.
The crystals were investigated under the polarised light microscope, which revealed that they were
twinned.
A small quantity of the green precipitate, K3Fe(C2O4)3·3H2O, was ground with an agate pestle and
mortar, and then loaded into a flat sample holder, 25 mm in diameter and 2 mm deep. A powder
diffraction pattern was measured with Ni-filtered CuKα radiation at room temperature in θ/θ
reflection mode using a Bruker D5005 diffractometer working in step-scanning mode and equipped
656 Seventh European Powder Diffraction Conference EPDIC 7
with a scintillation counter. The sample was scanned from 7–80° 2θ, with a step size of 0.02° and
counting time of 40 s.
A thermogravimetry study was performed to examine the dehydration of the complex. This
analysis was carried out using a Perkin-Elmer TGA-7 instrument, with a sample mass of 4.739 g.
Table 1. Unit cell parameters for compounds with formula MI3 MIII (C2O4)3·3H2O
(MI= K, Rb, NH4, K0.9Na0.1 and MIII= Al, Cr, Ga, Fe, Mn)
MI3 MIII Ref S. G. a(Å) b(Å) c(Å) β(°) V(Å3) PDF[11] F30[17]
Results
The Bruker analytical software EVA [13] was used to establish the positions of the peaks from the
α1 component and to strip mathematically the α2 component from each reflection. The first 20 peak
positions were measured from the pattern and input to the auto-indexing program DICVOL91 [14].
A unique solution was readily obtained in a monoclinic system, a = 7.757(3) Å, b = 19.944(4) Å, c
= 10.353(2) Å, β= 107.76(2)° and M20 = 25.2, F20 = 58.9 (0.0064, 53).
An analysis of the systematically absent reflections showed the space group to be P21/c (C52h,
Nº14). From the review of the whole diffraction pattern using the program NBS*AIDS83 [15],
better cell parameters were obtained: a = 7.762(1) Å, b = 19.937(3) Å, c = 10.353(1) Å, β
= 107.75(1)°, with figures of merit M20 = 30.3 [16] and F30 = 62.1 (0.0078, 62) [17].
The Rietveld refinement [18] was carried out using the program WinRIETVELD [19]. The initial
model of K3Fe(C2O4)3·3H2O was obtained from the isostructural compound K3Cr(C2O4)3·3H2O [6].
The final refinement involved 95 parameters, including scale factor, zero shift, asymmetry, the U,
V, W, and mixing parameters of the pseudo-Voigt peakshape function, four coefficients for the
polynomial of the background, four unit cell parameters, 75 positional parameters and 5 isotropic
temperature factors. The final figures of merit were: RP = 11.61%, Rwp = 4.50%, Rp = 3.44%, Rexp =
3.06% and χ2 = 1.47. The final Rietveld plot is shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows a view of the
metal complex plotted using the program DIAMOND [20].
Materials Science Forum Vols. 378-381 657
Figure 1. Observed (·), calculated (-), and difference plot of the final Rietveld refinement of
K3Fe(C2O4)3·3H2O.
The crystal structure consists of discrete Fe(C2O4)33- anions, K+ cations and water molecules. The
disorder among the water molecules observed in the related compounds was not refined in our
model. The structure of the tri(bidentate) Fe(C2O4)33- complex show a distorted octahedral
coordination with O(1)-Fe-O(2)= 82.74(1)º, O(3)-Fe-O(4)= 81.03(1)º, O(5)-Fe-O(6)= 82.74(1)º,
and an average Fe-O distance of 1.99(1) Å. This distortion is similar to those observed in the
isostructural compounds reported in Table 1. Six oxygen atoms surround each of the K+ atoms
from water molecules and oxalate anions, at distances varying from 2.6(6) to 2.9(9) Å.
The water molecules have 9 short contacts with other water molecules and the oxygens from the
Fe(C2O4)33- moiety, and also show electrostatic interactions with the K+ cations. Although there are
three crystallographically distinct water molecules in the structure, the analysis of contacts and
electrostatic interactions shows that water molecule O2w has weaker interactions than the other
two.
This result is in perfect agreement with the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) carried out on this
compound. Figure 3 shows the TGA curve for K3Fe(C2O4)3·3H2O. At 113.0 °C the compound loses
3.67% weight corresponding to one water molecule presumably O2w. Then, at 136.5 °C the
compound loses 11.0% in weight corresponding to the other two water molecules.
658 Seventh European Powder Diffraction Conference EPDIC 7
References
[1] Louër, D., Boultif, A. Gotor, F.J. and Criado, J.M. Powder Diffr. 5, 162 (1990).
[2] Louër, D., Louër, M., Gotor, F.J. and Criado, J.M. J. Solid State Chem. 92, 565 (1991).
[3] Bataille, T. and Louër, D. Acta Cryst. C552, 1760 (1999).
[4] Bataille, T., Auffredic, J.P. and Louër, D. Chem. Mater. 11, 1559 (1999).
[5] Bataille, T., Louër, M., Auffredic, J.P. and Louër, D. J. Solid State Chem. 150, 81 (2000).
[6] Taylor, D. Aust. J. Chem. 31, 1455 (1978).
[7] Merrachi, E.H., Mentzen, B.F., Chassagneux, F. and Bouix, J. Rev. Chim. Miner. 24, 56
(1987).
[8] Merrachi, E.H., Mentzen, B.F. and Chassagneux, F. Rev. Chim. Miner. 24, 427 (1987).
[9] Lis, T. and Matuszewski, J. Acta Cryst. B36, 1938 (1980).
[10] Wartchow, R. Z. Kristallogr New Cryst Struc. 212, 83 (1997).
[11] Powder Diffraction File (PDF-2, Set 1-49), International Center for Diffraction Data (1999).
[12] Bulc, N., Golic, L. and Siftar, J. Acta Cryst. C40, 1829 (1984).
[13] EVA, Bruker AXS, Sigma-C GmbH. Version 4.0 (1998).
[14] Boultif, A. and Louër, D. J. Appl. Cryst. 24, 987 (1991).
[15] Mighell, A.D, Hubbard, C.R., Stalick, J.K. NBS Tech. Note 1141 (1981).
[16] de Wolff, P.M. J. Appl. Cryst. 1, 108 (1968).
[17] Smith, G.S. and Snyder, R.L. J. Appl. Cryst. 12, 60 (1979).
[18] Rietveld, H.M. J. Appl. Cryst. 2, 65 (1969).
[19] WinRIETVELD, Bruker AXS, Sigma-C GmbH. Version 3.0 (1998).
[20] Branderburg, K. DIAMOND Visual Crystal Structure Information System, v.2.0h, Crystal
Impact GbR. (1998).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by CDCHT-ULA and CONICIT, Grant LAB-97000821, for the
establishment of the “Laboratorio Nacional de Difracción de Rayos-X”, and the computer facilities
of CeCalcULA.